Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 06:35:20 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Hye-Shik Chang <perky@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Adding CONFLICTS to ports (Re: cvs commit: ports/databases/zodb3 Makefile distinfo pkg-plist) Message-ID: <20031011133520.GA812@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <200310111144.h9BBiRD5094613@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200310111144.h9BBiRD5094613@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 04:44:27AM -0700, Hye-Shik Chang wrote: > perky 2003/10/11 04:44:27 PDT >=20 > FreeBSD ports repository >=20 > Modified files: > databases/zodb3 Makefile distinfo pkg-plist=20 > Log: > - Update to 3.2. > - Assign maintainership to me. > - Add an CONFLICTS entry against zodb-1*. A lot of people seem to be adding CONFLICTS entries to their ports lately, which is a good thing, but only if they're added to _all_ of the conflicting ports. In this case, the zodb port also needs a corresponding directive so that it conflicts with zodb3. Is there some other reason that people aren't doing this? Kris --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/iAcYWry0BWjoQKURAi7nAJ4/BFTmfIDQoJIaer4sq1KopPzc5ACcDF6t nk2N7Vlsiovu65BiRYRjE+U= =3j4l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031011133520.GA812>