Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 06 May 2011 16:38:00 +0300
From:      Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.org, multimedia@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: dsp mmap change
Message-ID:  <4DC3F9B8.3030505@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110506133204.GE48734@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
References:  <4DC3B764.4030801@FreeBSD.org> <20110506133204.GE48734@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 06/05/2011 16:32 Kostik Belousov said the following:
> On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 11:55:00AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>> I would like to ask for a review and/or testing of the following patch:
>> http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/dev_dsp_mmap.diff
>>
>> It's supposed to fix an issue described here:
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-multimedia/2011-February/011691.html
>>
>> In short, the following pseudo-code should do the right thing:
>> fd = open(/dev/dsp, O_RDWR);
>> mmap(PROT_READ, fd);
>> mmap(PROT_WRITE, fd);
>>
>> Thank you!
> 
> I think that you have to call PCM_GIANT_LEAVE() when returning
> EINVAL on the vm_pager_alloc() failure.

Yes, thank you.

> Your patch hardcodes an assumption that sndbufs are always
> contiguous. I was unable to convince myself that this is true.

I think that this should be true for the case when DMA is used?
But, yes, very good point.

-- 
Andriy Gapon



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4DC3F9B8.3030505>