From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 29 08:30:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B56DF1065670; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 08:30:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net) Received: from mail.droso.net (koala.ipv6.droso.net [IPv6:2001:6c8:6:c:20d:56ff:fe6f:f935]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A4A38FC28; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 08:30:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.droso.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id BA6981CC5F; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:30:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:30:56 +0200 From: Erwin Lansing To: Peter Pentchev Message-ID: <20100329083056.GA93874@droso.net> References: <201003221056.o2MAu4D5001930@repoman.freebsd.org> <20100326192300.25171ab9.stas@FreeBSD.org> <20100329074634.GA1315@straylight.m.ringlet.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FCuugMFkClbJLl1L" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100329074634.GA1315@straylight.m.ringlet.net> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/i386 7.2-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Stanislav Sedov , cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/dns/c-ares Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/dns/c-ares/files ares-config-info.patch patch-Makefile.in X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 08:30:58 -0000 --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:46:34AM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: >=20 > Am I wrong in assuming that any automatically-built packages would > have BATCH and/or PACKAGE_BUILDING defined at build time, and that That's an "and". http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/ports/Tools/portbuild/scri= pts/buildenv?rev=3D1.29;content-type=3Dtext%2Fplain Cheers, -erwin > the code in bsd.port(.pre).mk would use the default value for all > options in that case? Or is there some defined symbol - or some other > combination of symbols - that would result in WITH_HIDE_SYMBOLS > *not* being defined, even though the option's default is "yes"? >=20 > Of course, I could be missing something, in which case I'd be thankful > for a correction in my worldview :) >=20 > G'luck, > Peter >=20 > --=20 > Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@space.bg roam@FreeBSD.org > PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc > Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13 > If there were no counterfactuals, this sentence would not have been parad= oxical. --=20 Erwin Lansing http://droso.org Prediction is very difficult especially about the future erwin@FreeBSD.org --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFLsGU/qy9aWxUlaZARAiZBAKCCPbI2Ndk9vwck1Dw6o2WYMuE0BwCg1bba FpbgeWUp28uj52A4IwSH9bw= =g+be -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L--