Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 11:30:53 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: build tools as separate distribution Message-ID: <200008301730.LAA17118@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 30 Aug 2000 10:01:26 PDT." <20000830100126.D45710@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20000830100126.D45710@dragon.nuxi.com> <xzp3djn9h2o.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20000830100126.D45710@dragon.nuxi.com> "David O'Brien" writes: : On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 12:30:39PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: : > What would the good people think of moving gcc, gas, ld etc., as well : > as include files and static libraries out of the bin dist and into a : > separate distribution, called e.g. prog or devel? There are a lot of : : You need to convince JKH (as release engineer). I was going to do this : for 4.2, but he said no. I think we can do this for 5.0, however, since I think we can convince him that it is a good idea. However, I think that someone will need to come up with patches to sysinstall. Also, there's likely some UI issues with minimal changing from "complete for a hosting system" to "incomplete for a hosting system, but complete for a target system." Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200008301730.LAA17118>