Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 14:38:59 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 193183] [STAGE] net/beacon: Request MAINTAINERship, pkg-descr cleanup Message-ID: <bug-193183-13-0ptlh6Z4L6@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-193183-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-193183-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193183 --- Comment #26 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to C Hutchinson from comment #25) > (In reply to John Marino from comment #23) > > can you tell use what perllocal.pod.gz does and why we need it? > > Or why it's bad that it's compressed instead of plain text? > > > > Why do we care about this file? > > I (we) don't. But check-plist, and the port do. :) This is a completely bogus answer. If I don't want perllocal.pod.gz in the port, then I simply remove it in the post-install target. I'm not forced to keep it. As the maintainer, you should know exactly why this file is needed, or if it's needed. If it's not, then just remove it and be done with it. > I only learned about MANCOMPRESSED from the porters documentation, when > I ran up against this issue. However. I became frustrated, when it > didn't work as anticipated/documented. It wasn't until I discovered > that the documentation omitted compress-man: as a prerequisite. That > it worked as intended. I have never ever seen "compress-man" before. I've never used it. The documentation omits it because you aren't supposed to use it is my guess. If I haven't seen it before, where are you getting told to use it? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-193183-13-0ptlh6Z4L6>