From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Jun  2 18:01:17 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id SAA08777
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 2 Jun 1995 18:01:17 -0700
Received: from cs.weber.edu (cs.weber.edu [137.190.16.16])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id SAA08771
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 2 Jun 1995 18:01:16 -0700
Received: by cs.weber.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1.1)
	id AA28926; Fri, 2 Jun 95 18:54:27 MDT
From: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert)
Message-Id: <9506030054.AA28926@cs.weber.edu>
Subject: Re: Size of SIOCGIFCONF ioctl data structure
To: peter@haywire.DIALix.COM (Peter Wemm)
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 95 18:54:26 MDT
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SV4.3.91.950603082739.20848B-100000@haywire.DIALix.COM> from "Peter Wemm" at Jun 3, 95 08:33:15 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4dev PL52]
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> > 1)	Do it via sysctl anyway.
> 
> Just as a BTW: Is this method fairly consistant across the 4.4BSD type 
> machines? Or are there variations on the way it has been implemented?

Uh, it's more advanced in FreeBSD than elsewhere, from what I've seen
recently.  I know, that's bad for portability.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@cs.weber.edu
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.