From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jun 2 17:05:49 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA10365 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 17:05:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from fly.HiWAAY.net (root@fly.HiWAAY.net [208.147.154.56]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA10329 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 17:05:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dkelly@n4hhe.ampr.org) Received: from nospam.hiwaay.net (tnt2-85.HiWAAY.net [208.147.148.85]) by fly.HiWAAY.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) with ESMTP id TAA12851; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 19:05:33 -0500 (CDT) Received: from n4hhe.ampr.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nospam.hiwaay.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA02950; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 19:05:31 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dkelly@n4hhe.ampr.org) Message-Id: <199806030005.TAA02950@nospam.hiwaay.net> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Julian Elischer cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG From: David Kelly Subject: Re: ddp_route error In-reply-to: Message from Julian Elischer of "Tue, 02 Jun 1998 11:04:40 PDT." <35743EB8.167EB0E7@whistle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 02 Jun 1998 19:05:30 -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Julian Elischer writes: > Abdellah Djebli wrote: > > We have a box running FreeBSD 2.2.5-STABLE. > > It is running fine, except that we have this error: > > /kernel: ddp_route: still have no valid route. > > We could not find the source for this error. > > Do you have any idea where this is coming from. > > I presume, since you have it running that you applied the 2.2.5 > ERRATA patches.. > > basically the routing in appletalk can be quite complicated. > there is a case where an outgoing packet discovers that it's route > to a destination is wrong, and invalidates it. > then it tries to find a replacement, and if it can't, that message is > produced.. > however appletalk is quite robust, and I don't think you will see any > failures because of it. As I mentioned in an earlier post all my systems with "options NETATALK" bellyached about ddp_route when booting. Only quieted after afpd & family got started and inialized somethink in the kernel. I keep fairly current in -stable. Was only this week that I first built a 2.2.6 kernel that didn't complain about ddp_route when it booted. Only booted once so I don't know if its a fluke. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net ===================================================================== The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message