Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 04:27:55 -0400 From: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/elf2aout elf2aout.c Message-ID: <20020521042755.B56179@espresso.q9media.com> In-Reply-To: <20020521074034.GB53675@sunbay.com>; from ru@FreeBSD.org on Tue, May 21, 2002 at 10:40:34AM %2B0300 References: <200205200756.g4K7ueM28492@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020520125748.E8089@espresso.q9media.com> <20020521074034.GB53675@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> writes: > On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 12:57:48PM -0400, Mike Barcroft wrote: > > Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> writes: > > > ru 2002/05/20 00:56:40 PDT > > > > > > Modified files: > > > usr.bin/elf2aout elf2aout.c > > > Log: > > > s/u_int/u_int32_t/ > > > > > > Revision Changes Path > > > 1.3 +9 -8 src/usr.bin/elf2aout/elf2aout.c > > > > Can we take this a step further and use the proper spelling: > > s/u_int32_t/uint32_t/ > > > You'll have to fix <sys/elf32.h> first. Also make sure this > still can be bootstrapped from the old versions. Well it looks like the structure you changed is for aout information, so I don't see how <sys/elf32.h> would be significant. But even if it were, u_int32_t and uint32_t will always be compatible with each other. The only difference being that the latter is portable, which is a positive attribute for cross-tools. Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020521042755.B56179>