From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 00:34:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 723BE16A417 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 00:34:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@rucci.org) Received: from mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.4.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49EC713C46E for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 00:34:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@rucci.org) Received: from izer.warganizer.com (ool-182dc652.dyn.optonline.net [24.45.198.82]) by mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTP id <0JUK000TR49NBC60@mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:34:36 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:34:35 -0500 From: Daniel Rucci In-reply-to: <47894E87.2020300@chrismaness.com> To: Chris Maness Message-id: <47895C9B.1040002@rucci.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 References: <47894E87.2020300@chrismaness.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080112) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: index.php not automatically displaying X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 00:34:37 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Chris Maness wrote: | I have two web servers -- one old, and another I have just set up. I have tried to set up the new http.conf the same for php files, but the new one does not automatically parse index.php like index.html. This works on the old server, but not the new. I have AddType application/x-httpd-php .php and ~ DirectoryIndex index.html index.php -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHiVya35WRARjlw0YRAm2HAJ44kEEO3oSg31AP6iLZY57UHJYJXwCdE1nN kSohV1xCrGQdW/yJALS+7TI= =pEo7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 01:27:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF4F16A418 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 01:27:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hamilton@pobox.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8741813C457 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 01:27:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hamilton@pobox.com) Received: from woodstock.nethamilton.net ([72.135.240.24]) by hrndva-omta01.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20080113012729.PNUI11942.hrndva-omta01.mail.rr.com@woodstock.nethamilton.net>; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 01:27:29 +0000 Received: by woodstock.nethamilton.net (Postfix, from userid 500) id 43D9525C5554; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:27:29 -0600 (CST) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:27:29 -0600 From: Jon Hamilton To: Jeffrey Goldberg Message-ID: <20080113012729.GI1965@woodstock.nethamilton.net> References: <47879080.6040208@gmail.com> <53AFE19A-173F-43AC-BF68-972FFD12029E@goldmark.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53AFE19A-173F-43AC-BF68-972FFD12029E@goldmark.org> Cc: Andy Greenwood , User questions Subject: Re: syslogd not reading messages from a remote machine X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 01:27:30 -0000 Jeffrey Goldberg , said on Sat Jan 12, 2008 [03:50:45 PM]: } On Jan 11, 2008, at 9:51 AM, Andy Greenwood wrote: } } >I have recently set up a Fortigate-60 to run as a firewall/vpn on my } >home network. I have a FreeBSD 7.0-prerelease machine sitting behind } >it in the DMZ which is running ssh/web/etc. I'm trying to get the FG } >to log to the BSD box's syslog. I have set up the necessary stuff on } >the FG, and can send test logs from there to the bsd box. Running } >tcpdump on the bsd [...] } } >So I know that the packets are getting to the machine. I've set up } >syslogd to accept packets from 10.10.10.1/32 in rc.conf, and } >confirmed that the FG's IP should be accepted [...] } } } >I've restarted syslogd after every change I've made, but no dice. } >Can anyone shed some light on why these messages aren't logging and } >what I need to do to fix it? I didn't see the original thread, but I recently went through this myself. It turns out that syslogd assumes/requires by default that the originating packets come *from* port 514 as well as arriving *on* port 514. In my case, the remote device was sending from a high numbered port. To disable that behavior, just put -a 10.10.10.1/32:* in your syslogd_flags and you should be good to go (if your problem was the same as mine :) -- Jon Hamilton hamilton@pobox.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 02:11:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E3616A418 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 02:11:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from mx-out.forthnet.gr (mx-out.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62BF013C448 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 02:11:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from mx-av-03.forthnet.gr (mx-av.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.27]) by mx-out-02.forthnet.gr (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m0D2Axmj016376; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 04:10:59 +0200 Received: from MX-IN-01.forthnet.gr (mx-in-01.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.23]) by mx-av-03.forthnet.gr (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m0D2Ax9E014547; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 04:10:59 +0200 Received: from kobe.laptop (ppp43-253.adsl.forthnet.gr [62.1.60.253]) by MX-IN-01.forthnet.gr (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0D2Av0a016403; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 04:10:57 +0200 Authentication-Results: MX-IN-01.forthnet.gr smtp.mail=keramida@ceid.upatras.gr; spf=neutral Authentication-Results: MX-IN-01.forthnet.gr header.from=keramida@ceid.upatras.gr; sender-id=neutral Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0D2Auer001827; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 04:10:56 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m0D2AuAJ001826; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 04:10:56 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 04:10:55 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Jeffrey Goldberg Message-ID: <20080113021055.GA1667@kobe.laptop> References: <47879080.6040208@gmail.com> <53AFE19A-173F-43AC-BF68-972FFD12029E@goldmark.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53AFE19A-173F-43AC-BF68-972FFD12029E@goldmark.org> Cc: Andy Greenwood , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: syslogd not reading messages from a remote machine X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 02:11:05 -0000 On 2008-01-12 15:50, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote: > On Jan 11, 2008, at 9:51 AM, Andy Greenwood wrote: >> I have recently set up a Fortigate-60 to run as a firewall/vpn on my >> home network. I have a FreeBSD 7.0-prerelease machine sitting behind >> it in the DMZ which is running ssh/web/etc. I'm trying to get the FG >> to log to the BSD box's syslog. I have set up the necessary stuff on >> the FG, and can send test logs from there to the bsd box. Running >> tcpdump on the bsd [...] >> >> So I know that the packets are getting to the machine. I've set up >> syslogd to accept packets from 10.10.10.1/32 in rc.conf, and >> confirmed that the FG's IP should be accepted [...] >> >> I've restarted syslogd after every change I've made, but no dice. Can >> anyone shed some light on why these messages aren't logging and what >> I need to do to fix it? > > I'm sure that there is a simple answer for getting syslogd to work > properly. But after similar experiences to yours (on other systems), I now > use syslog-ng (in ports) for any system that is going to be a remote syslog > server. To the original poster, since I missed the message which started the thread... Andy, the default mode of syslogd in FreeBSD is `secure mode', because the -s option is enabled in `/etc/defaults/rc.conf': % root@kobe:/root# grep '^syslogd_' /etc/defaults/rc.conf % syslogd_enable="YES" # Run syslog daemon (or NO). % syslogd_program="/usr/sbin/syslogd" # path to syslogd, if you want a different one. % syslogd_flags="-s" # Flags to syslogd (if enabled). % root@kobe:/root# The -s flag in the default options means that syslogd will *not* log messages from remote hosts. Quoting the syslogd manpage: -s Operate in secure mode. Do not log messages from remote machines. If specified twice, no network socket will be opened at all, which also disables logging to remote machines. I'm using the following in `/etc/rc.conf': % root@kobe:/root# grep '^syslogd_' /etc/rc.conf % syslogd_enable="YES" % syslogd_flags="" % root@kobe:/root# and the syslogd on the system where this message is typed properly logs messages from my DSL modem: % root@kobe:/root# fgrep ' fire ' /var/log/messages | head -1 % Jan 12 22:04:26 fire kernel: Intrusion -> IN=ppp_8_35_1 OUT= MAC= \ % SRC=62.1.173.240 DST=62.1.60.253 LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 \ % TTL=126 ID=39175 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=2213 DPT=445 WINDOW=16384 \ % RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 % root@kobe:/root# NOTE: If you are also using a firewall, you will have to make sure that incoming UDP messages for the `syslog' service are allowed. This is the `pf.conf' snippet from my home network setup: pass in proto udp from 192.169.1.0/24 to any port = syslog HTH, Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 02:13:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6347A16A418 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 02:13:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nsayer@kfu.com) Received: from quack.kfu.com (unknown [IPv6:2002:478d:4001::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C55213C442 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 02:13:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nsayer@kfu.com) Received: from bacchus.kfu.com (bacchus.kfu.com [IPv6:2002:478d:4001:1:216:cbff:fea9:7b6f]) (authenticated bits=0) by quack.kfu.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0D2DQXu076225 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:13:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nsayer@kfu.com) Message-Id: <86B81ED1-B584-490B-9F06-2BF983601BB8@kfu.com> From: Nick Sayer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:13:26 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (quack.kfu.com [IPv6:2002:478d:4001:0:207:e9ff:fe39:59ce]); Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:13:29 -0800 (PST) X-Filter-Version: 1.15 (quack.kfu.com) Subject: GPT support? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 02:13:30 -0000 I've got a 7.0-RC1 system and am setting up a 1TB USB drive on it. I'd like to set the drive up with a GUID partition table. I've used the GPT utility to create the GPT label and the partition, but though GPT says that there's now a da0p1 partition, I don't see a /dev node for it. I'd assume that I'd need to load a GEOM module for GPT.... but I don't see one. It hardly seems possible that GPT support isn't there... What do I have to do? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 02:32:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C03516A419 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 02:32:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from ns1.kq6up.org (adsl-76-238-148-145.dsl.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [76.238.148.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47EDA13C442 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 02:32:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([192.168.1.2]) by ns1.kq6up.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m0D2W69K027952; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:32:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Message-ID: <47897821.2020707@chrismaness.com> Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:32:01 -0800 From: Chris Maness User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Rucci References: <47894E87.2020300@chrismaness.com> <47895C9B.1040002@rucci.org> In-Reply-To: <47895C9B.1040002@rucci.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: index.php not automatically displaying X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 02:32:08 -0000 Daniel Rucci wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Chris Maness wrote: > | I have two web servers -- one old, and another I have just set up. > I have tried to set up the new http.conf the same for php files, but > the new one does not automatically parse index.php like index.html. > This works on the old server, but not the new. > I have > AddType application/x-httpd-php .php > > and > > > ~ DirectoryIndex index.html index.php > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFHiVya35WRARjlw0YRAm2HAJ44kEEO3oSg31AP6iLZY57UHJYJXwCdE1nN > kSohV1xCrGQdW/yJALS+7TI= > =pEo7 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > I added this to my httpd.conf, but it still does not automatically parse. I have to click on index.php Thanks -- Chris Maness (909) 223-9179 http://www.chrismaness.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 02:52:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A41916A419 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 02:52:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: from mail.digitalfreaks.org (arbitor.digitalfreaks.org [216.151.95.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E47613C45D for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 02:52:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: by mail.digitalfreaks.org (Postfix, from userid 1022) id EC053172A5; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 21:52:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.digitalfreaks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAC4A171F0; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 21:52:43 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 21:52:43 -0500 (EST) From: "Brian A. Seklecki" X-X-Sender: lavalamp@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org To: Dennis Glatting In-Reply-To: <1200013948.42497.0.camel@btw.pki2.com> Message-ID: <20080112214949.I66279@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org> References: <200712270548.lBR5m0HT004974@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <20080109112208.G66279@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org> <1199901272.85209.71.camel@btw.pki2.com> <20080110142459.R66279@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org> <1200013948.42497.0.camel@btw.pki2.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Olivier Nicole , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dell Power Edge 2950 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 02:52:45 -0000 > > No idea. The systems are remote to me, so I can't check. > BTW it's called "patrol read". I was just having a particularly cynical day. The PR confirms that manually initiating one with megacli causes a hard lock. It could be a linux32 compat issue sending the command or it could be the driver interacting with the feature ... either way, I blame Dell. I guess I'm still bitter. ~BAS From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 03:14:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D54716A419 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 03:14:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfalang.bob@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.154]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A8C813C45D for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 03:14:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfalang.bob@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so1868226fgg.35 for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:14:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=map+IIYkucupYQT5CiiNOptPHizieziLz6dzkLEc93w=; b=a5Gd8v9e0lbR1G+l14NtMJGFtdDS1K9jjNUY/WqLH8+/pzseqfWSoJuGUfrcHOcvEmA1rIu6jROw2vp1YwzwTkhPECq0LvhXsLLXeG5FmrSwMxWnOOdGQo1jLjSwyQWrNpvdgNoP7bEzKIdkPxdrSd0aN4f6bAogxmie5AEtMsU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tYHk3QgmxktD9bLLvQ/My8f3Kwb2WX78umU973wTtRfjC13OjoBrV9Ls3KJarDqP0zVw0pwi3G5+oC81IYPr+IyvcRDuHeuZ6LZcYqgIoNteAWj2LA7vcKABV/IaeuV8UqeSoT5R2c5nHtKe42vE4Lg5lfxAZZ9mzfaDVkmgsIE= Received: by 10.86.1.1 with SMTP id 1mr4730632fga.2.1200194066955; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:14:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.86.59.15 with HTTP; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:14:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <58d1e8d30801121914l3779e8f8qb2b3ced5d7e55faa@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 22:14:26 -0500 From: "Bob Falanga" To: "Manolis Kiagias" In-Reply-To: <4786F95F.4050201@otenet.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <58d1e8d30801101905i2b9ab707w56baf9c8942d2b05@mail.gmail.com> <4786F95F.4050201@otenet.gr> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: configure printers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 03:14:29 -0000 I am sorry but I don't know what you are talking about, what/where is DesktopBSD Package Manager? I don't know what it is or where to find it. HELP Thank you, Bob Falanga On 1/11/08, Manolis Kiagias wrote: > Bob Falanga wrote: > > I would like to configure a HP laserjet 1018 USB on freebsd. So far I have > > had no luck. During the boot cycle I can see the Laserjet 1018 listed as a > > peripheral (ulpt0 HP LaserJet 1018 address 3 rev 9.00/1.00 iclass 7/1 > using > > bi directional niods). when I go to settings in the pop-down menu then to > > printers, change to administrator, freebsd doesn't show any printers > > connected to the computer. > > > > HELP > > > > thank you, > > Bob > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > I happen to have a Laserjet 1015 that works perfectly. I believe they > are quite similar. > I suggest you use CUPS to operate this. A quick guide specific to > FreeBSD can be found in DesktopBSD's site here: > > http://desktopbsd.net/wiki/doku.php?id=doc:printing > > Install all the ports mentioned (you may have some already installed > and others will be pulled as dependencies) and then follow the rest of > the instructions for setting device permissions and so on. You will have > the printer running in no time. > > Manolis > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 03:41:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5516B16A417 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 03:41:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nsayer@kfu.com) Received: from quack.kfu.com (unknown [IPv6:2002:478d:4001::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 192DC13C458 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 03:41:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nsayer@kfu.com) Received: from bacchus.kfu.com (bacchus.kfu.com [IPv6:2002:478d:4001:1:216:cbff:fea9:7b6f]) (authenticated bits=0) by quack.kfu.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0D3fhdM002414 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:41:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nsayer@kfu.com) Message-Id: From: Nick Sayer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <86B81ED1-B584-490B-9F06-2BF983601BB8@kfu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:41:43 -0800 References: <86B81ED1-B584-490B-9F06-2BF983601BB8@kfu.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (quack.kfu.com [IPv6:2002:478d:4001:1:207:e9ff:fe39:59cf]); Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:41:46 -0800 (PST) X-Filter-Version: 1.15 (quack.kfu.com) Subject: Re: GPT support? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 03:41:47 -0000 Never mind. I figured it out. option GEOM_GPT got renamed to GEOM_PART_GPT in 7.0. With a new, corrected kernel, it's working. :) On Jan 12, 2008, at 6:13 PM, Nick Sayer wrote: > I've got a 7.0-RC1 system and am setting up a 1TB USB drive on it. > I'd like to set the drive up with a GUID partition table. I've used > the GPT utility to create the GPT label and the partition, but > though GPT says that there's now a da0p1 partition, I don't see a / > dev node for it. > > I'd assume that I'd need to load a GEOM module for GPT.... but I > don't see one. It hardly seems possible that GPT support isn't > there... What do I have to do? > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 03:54:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3566916A417; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 03:54:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd.alaskaparadise.com (freebsd.alaskaparadise.com [208.79.80.117]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ECED13C455; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 03:54:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@freebsd.org) Received: from 137-42-178-69.gci.net (137-42-178-69.gci.net [69.178.42.137]) by freebsd.alaskaparadise.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EDA22383675; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 03:54:11 +0000 (UTC) From: Beech Rintoul To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200801120640.02582.rpj911@cinci.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <200801120640.02582.rpj911@cinci.rr.com> X-Face: jC2w\k*Q1\0DA2Q0Eh&BrP/Rt2M,^2O#R07VoT98m*>miQF9%Bi9vy`F6cPjwEe?m,)=?iso-8859-1?q?2=0A=09X=3FM=5C=3AOE9QgZ?="xT3/n3,3MJ7N=Cfkmi%f(w^~X"SUxn>; 27NO; C+)g[7J`$G*SN>{<=?iso-8859-1?q?O=3Bg7=7C=0A=09o=7D=265A=5D4?=@7D`=Eb@Zs1Ln814?]|k@'bG=.Ca"[|8+_.OsNAo8!#?4u MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:54:03 -0900 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200801121854.07024.beech@freebsd.org> Cc: rpj911 , Beech Rintoul Subject: Re: Request for a package or port... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Beech Rintoul List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 03:54:12 -0000 On Friday 11 January 2008, rpj911 said: > Hello, > > I've been using Linux for a few years and just switched to > DesktopBSD, very nice. If it's not too much trouble, could you guys > port or create a package for the Mnemosyne Project. It's a > flashcard program... > > Thanks. > > Bob > Cincinnati, Ohio Done, update your ports tree and it's at /usr/ports/games/py-mnemosyne. Enjoy, Beech -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - beech@FreeBSD.org /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 04:29:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 811CF16A417 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 04:29:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from punosevac@math.arizona.edu) Received: from smtp-gs.math.arizona.edu (math051.cs.arizona.edu [150.135.82.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B91913C447 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 04:29:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from punosevac@math.arizona.edu) Received: from Debian-exim by smtp-gs.math.arizona.edu with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JDuTm-0004ye-Ji for questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 21:29:51 -0700 Received: from 71-220-164-236.tcsn.qwest.net ([71.220.164.236] helo=oko.bagdala.net) by smtp-gs.math.arizona.edu with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JDuTm-0004yW-Cy for questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 21:29:50 -0700 Message-ID: <47893259.7080108@math.arizona.edu> Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 14:34:17 -0700 From: Predrag Punosevac User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070818) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ACL-Warn: The HELO/EHLO greeting oko.bagdala.net is invalid X-Outgoing-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) Cc: Subject: ps2pdf problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 04:29:59 -0000 Dear All, I was wondering if you could give me little help with Ghostscript. I am using powerdot package to create presentation slides. For those unfamiliar with the package one needs to go through .tex --> .dvi --> .ps --> .pdf for graphics to display properly (pdflatex is not an option nor it is dvipdfm) Latex (actually TeXLive) and dvips do their job properly and I am getting beautiful landscape slides (.ps). However, when I pass the .ps file through the ghostcript with ps2pdf slides gets trimmed. Is there some more advanced option for ps2pdfwr which will enable me to conserve the proper width of slides? Giving the presentation in .ps format is not an option since interactive links on slides are active only if the slides are in .pdf format. GSview (Ghostscript) for Windows has capability to act as ps2pdf filter and does the job correctly but I am stamped by the fact that GV nor gs nor ghostview have similar capabilities. I read carefully man pages for ps2pdf and ps2pdfwr but I am not getting anywhere. I am sure that I am not the only one who is using LaTeX for presentations (with the landscape layout). What are other people experiences with the slides and the Ghostscript. Best, Predrag P. S. I am aware of Beamer, Prosper, and ppower4. None of these classes comes even close to the perfect layout, capability, and simplicity of the Powerdot class so I really want to resolve the problem. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 05:10:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 831CD16A419 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 05:10:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@nyi.unixathome.org) Received: from nyi.unixathome.org (nyi.unixathome.org [64.147.113.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7568413C43E for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 05:10:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@nyi.unixathome.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nyi.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B805099E for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 05:10:03 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at unixathome.org Received: from nyi.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nyi.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jnrxmzIPuDx6 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 05:10:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: by nyi.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 098D050992; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 05:10:01 +0000 (GMT) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20080113051002.098D050992@nyi.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 05:10:01 +0000 (GMT) Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2007-12-23 - 2008-01-12 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 05:10:06 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 06:11:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DEA616A502 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 06:11:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from ns1.kq6up.org (adsl-76-238-148-145.dsl.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [76.238.148.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A75713C448 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 06:11:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([192.168.1.2]) by ns1.kq6up.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m0D6Axee028726; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 22:11:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Message-ID: <4789AB6E.5050408@chrismaness.com> Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 22:10:54 -0800 From: Chris Maness User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Erik Cederstrand , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <47894E87.2020300@chrismaness.com> <47899AFD.80800@cederstrand.dk> In-Reply-To: <47899AFD.80800@cederstrand.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: index.php not automatically displaying X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 06:11:08 -0000 Erik Cederstrand wrote: > Chris Maness wrote: >> I have two web servers -- one old, and another I have just set up. I >> have tried to set up the new http.conf the same for php files, but >> the new one does not automatically parse index.php like index.html. >> This works on the old server, but not the new. >> >> Here are what I think the relevant lines in http.conf: >> >> # >> # DirectoryIndex: Name of the file or files to use as a pre-written HTML >> # directory index. Separate multiple entries with spaces. >> # >> >> >> >> DirectoryIndex index.php index.php3 index.html >> >> >> DirectoryIndex index.php3 index.html >> >> >> >> >> DirectoryIndex index.php index.html >> >> >> DirectoryIndex index.html >> >> >> >> >> DirectoryIndex index.php index.html >> >> >> DirectoryIndex index.html >> >> >> >> # >> >> AddType application/x-httpd-php .php >> AddType application/x-httpd-php-source .phps >> > > Your email is void of any verison numbers, but are you using mod_php5? > If so, the way I read that Apache config is: > > -> True > -> True > DirectoryIndex index.html > > (and no other paths followed) > > which would explain your situation. > > Erik I am using mod_php5. What is the correct configuration. Chris -- Chris Maness (909) 223-9179 http://www.chrismaness.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 06:18:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5287A16A420 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 06:18:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=johnl=0891ec7ce6@iecc.com) Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [208.31.42.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0F8613C448 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 06:18:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=johnl=0891ec7ce6@iecc.com) Received: (qmail 39784 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2008 05:51:20 -0000 Received: from simone.iecc.com (208.31.42.47) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 13 Jan 2008 05:51:20 -0000 Date: 13 Jan 2008 05:51:28 -0000 Message-ID: <20080113055128.23509.qmail@simone.iecc.com> From: John Levine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <47893259.7080108@math.arizona.edu> Organization: X-Headerized: yes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: punosevac@math.arizona.edu Subject: Re: ps2pdf problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 06:18:02 -0000 >However, when I pass the .ps file through the ghostcript with ps2pdf >slides gets trimmed. > >Is there some more advanced option for ps2pdfwr which will enable >me to conserve the proper width of slides? It sounds like your pages are formatted as landscape and are being translated as portrait. See http://ghostscript.com/doc/current/Ps2pdf.htm There are also options for larger page size which might be what you want. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 06:56:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E55916A41B for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 06:56:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from ns1.kq6up.org (adsl-76-238-148-145.dsl.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [76.238.148.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62DF513C459 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 06:56:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([192.168.1.2]) by ns1.kq6up.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m0D6tu8l028894; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 22:55:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Message-ID: <4789B5F7.7000302@chrismaness.com> Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 22:55:51 -0800 From: Chris Maness User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Erik Cederstrand References: <47894E87.2020300@chrismaness.com> <47899AFD.80800@cederstrand.dk> <4789AB6E.5050408@chrismaness.com> <4789B4BA.9060507@cederstrand.dk> In-Reply-To: <4789B4BA.9060507@cederstrand.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: index.php not automatically displaying X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 06:56:00 -0000 Erik Cederstrand wrote: > Chris Maness wrote: >> Erik Cederstrand wrote: >>> Chris Maness wrote: >>>> I have two web servers -- one old, and another I have just set up. >>>> I have tried to set up the new http.conf the same for php files, >>>> but the new one does not automatically parse index.php like >>>> index.html. This works on the old server, but not the new. >>>> >>>> Here are what I think the relevant lines in http.conf: >>>> >>>> # >>>> # DirectoryIndex: Name of the file or files to use as a pre-written >>>> HTML >>>> # directory index. Separate multiple entries with spaces. >>>> # >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> DirectoryIndex index.php index.php3 index.html >>>> >>>> >>>> DirectoryIndex index.php3 index.html >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> DirectoryIndex index.php index.html >>>> >>>> >>>> DirectoryIndex index.html >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> DirectoryIndex index.php index.html >>>> >>>> >>>> DirectoryIndex index.html >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> # >>>> >>>> AddType application/x-httpd-php .php >>>> AddType application/x-httpd-php-source .phps >>>> >>> >>> Your email is void of any verison numbers, but are you using >>> mod_php5? If so, the way I read that Apache config is: >>> >>> -> True >>> -> True >>> DirectoryIndex index.html >>> >>> (and no other paths followed) >>> >>> which would explain your situation. >>> >> I am using mod_php5. What is the correct configuration. > > I just have > > > DirectoryIndex index.html index.php > > > in mine. If you really want the extra IfModule checks, try > > > > DirectoryIndex index.html index.php > > > DirectoryIndex index.html > > > > Both php3 and php4 have reached EOL, so keep them out of the config > file unless you're actually using them. > > Erik It works, but I still have to click on index.php for it to come up. Even after refreshing the page. Chris -- Chris Maness (909) 223-9179 http://www.chrismaness.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 07:06:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABABD16A417 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 07:06:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F8F313C442 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 07:06:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from TEDSDESK (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id m0D76c5g016111; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 23:06:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Tommy Scheunemann" , Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 23:07:44 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1914 In-Reply-To: <20080111130111.q4ujmd20gs80c8oc@theseus.arrishq.net> Importance: Normal X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]); Sat, 12 Jan 2008 23:06:39 -0800 (PST) Cc: Subject: RE: FreeBSD 6.2 complete freeze X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 07:06:57 -0000 Your hardware is bad. I've seen this sort of thing dozens of times before. Likely it's bad ram, but it could be something else. Of course, I don't expect you to believe me. Load Windows on it and run some stuff on it and I'll bet it will freeze too. The very first step you need to do on troubleshooting this kind of thing is to build a second system - make sure it's not from the same vendor, not the same motherboard, not the same CPU, etc. - and build the software on it exactly like the first. Then swap it out and see if the freezing starts on the new system. I would bet that it will not. Ted > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Tommy > Scheunemann > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 5:01 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: FreeBSD 6.2 complete freeze > > > Hello everyone, > > I'm running a server with FreeBSD 6.2 installed. Since some time the > machine freezes completely, following the replies by the hoster even > the keyboard won't react so a hard reset is required. There're no > error messages like a Kernel Panic on the screen, just a freeze. > Once the machine is up again, there's also nothing in the logs which > points to a failure. > A dmesg dump: > > Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. > Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 > The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. > FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. > FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p9 #3: Fri Jan 11 13:35:14 CET 2008 > root@www.angelwings.ws:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ANGELWINGS > ACPI APIC Table: > Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 > CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz (2813.53-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf29 Stepping = 9 > > Features=0xbfebfbff RR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HT > T,TM,PBE> > Features2=0x4400> > real memory = 1072627712 (1022 MB) > avail memory = 1040654336 (992 MB) > Security auditing service present > BSM auditing present > ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard > kbd1 at kbdmux0 > acpi0: on motherboard > acpi0: Power Button (fixed) > cpu0: on acpi0 > acpi_throttle0: on cpu0 > acpi_button0: on acpi0 > acpi_button1: on acpi0 > pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff,0x4000-0x40bf on acpi0 > pci0: on pcib0 > agp0: mem > 0xe0000000-0xe7ffffff,0xe8100000-0xe817ffff irq 16 at device 2.0 on pci0 > agp0: detected 892k stolen memory > agp0: aperture size is 128M > uhci0: port 0xd800-0xd81f > irq 16 at device 29.0 on pci0 > uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > usb0: on uhci0 > usb0: USB revision 1.0 > uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > uhci1: port 0xd000-0xd01f > irq 19 at device 29.1 on pci0 > uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] > usb1: on uhci1 > usb1: USB revision 1.0 > uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > uhci2: port 0xd400-0xd41f > irq 18 at device 29.2 on pci0 > uhci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] > usb2: on uhci2 > usb2: USB revision 1.0 > uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > ehci0: mem > 0xe8180000-0xe81803ff irq 23 at device 29.7 on pci0 > ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > usb3: EHCI version 1.0 > usb3: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2 > usb3: on ehci0 > usb3: USB revision 2.0 > uhub3: Intel EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub3: 6 ports with 6 removable, self powered > pcib1: at device 30.0 on pci0 > pci1: on pcib1 > rl0: port 0xc000-0xc0ff mem > 0xe8000000-0xe80000ff irq 21 at device 5.0 on pci1 > miibus0: on rl0 > rlphy0: on miibus0 > rlphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto > rl0: Ethernet address: 00:0d:61:18:38:3e > isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 > isa0: on isab0 > atapci0: port > 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xf000-0xf00f at device 31.1 on pci0 > ata0: on atapci0 > ata1: on atapci0 > pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) > fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq > 2 on acpi0 > fdc0: [FAST] > sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags > 0x10 on acpi0 > sio0: type 16550A > ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on acpi0 > ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode > ppbus0: on ppc0 > plip0: on ppbus0 > lpt0: on ppbus0 > lpt0: Interrupt-driven port > ppi0: on ppbus0 > atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 > atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 > kbd0 at atkbd0 > atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > pmtimer0 on isa0 > sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 > sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> > vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 > sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > sio1: port may not be enabled > Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2813534500 Hz quality 800 > Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec > ad0: 152627MB at ata0-master UDMA100 > Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a > rl0: link state changed to UP > arplookup xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx failed: host is not on local network > > The arplookup problem was fixed by setting a static route via: > > route add -host xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx -interface rl0 > > and adding an entry in the ARP table. > > vmstat -i > > interrupt total rate > irq6: fdc0 3 0 > irq14: ata0 4391 4 > irq21: rl0 21161 23 > cpu0: timer 1823817 1999 > Total 1849372 2027 > > The server is running Apache 2.2.x in a Chroot Environment, MySQL in a > Master <- -> Master replication Mode and PF as Firewall. > > Except the self-compiled Kernel the Base System is still the default > one from R9 updated via freebsd-update. > The difference to the GENERIC Kernel is the added PF Support and Auditing. > > Any help would be welcome > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 07:20:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D707116A41B for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 07:20:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mahdieh.saeed@yahoo.com) Received: from n6.bullet.re3.yahoo.com (n6.bullet.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.237.91]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A8A7513C4DB for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 07:20:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mahdieh.saeed@yahoo.com) Received: from [68.142.237.87] by n6.bullet.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Jan 2008 07:07:17 -0000 Received: from [216.252.122.216] by t3.bullet.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Jan 2008 07:07:17 -0000 Received: from [69.147.84.107] by t1.bullet.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Jan 2008 07:07:17 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp202.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Jan 2008 07:07:17 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 13.90310.bm@omp202.mail.sp1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 59537 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Jan 2008 07:07:16 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=ELk/EabQ6VuszjfG4n/hWAI4fYJuFQh7gJ1G0p8Vg2uCr+Cg1DSPZbTpCKYAZlZ9NTl86DFRv7j08SKqa01zah7pYAXXoOK7yd3yiEqjdPdTddoYwSZBofIlkFa5j0nz/jN5v9oPMy7ym5SpctB0bv6RL23aw39BgpuLl+m0AlA=; X-YMail-OSG: 5iIf.DEVM1myT1jiu8a538DjRXsg55HtM4ck2sXK9CmbknujmNeCEXRxeyY60v8WyQ3LZsQihH7vjL2gY0fMNJ5Tpg-- Received: from [91.184.77.147] by web45904.mail.sp1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 23:07:16 PST Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 23:07:16 -0800 (PST) From: mahdieh Saeed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <802024.58831.qm@web45904.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: recovery FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 07:20:50 -0000 Hi, I have a question about recovery. I removed one directory with "rm -r ".Is there any way to restore information that removed with "rm -r". Please help me, Regards, Saeed --------------------------------- Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 07:26:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7398816A468 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 07:26:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.4.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74DF513C43E for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 07:26:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from flosoft.no-ip.biz (ool-435559b8.dyn.optonline.net [67.85.89.184]) by mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTP id <0JUK000V4NBS12D0@mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 02:26:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from flosoft.no-ip.biz (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by flosoft.no-ip.biz (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0D7QFo6048761; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 02:26:15 -0500 Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 02:26:15 -0500 From: "Aryeh M. Friedman" In-reply-to: <802024.58831.qm@web45904.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> To: mahdieh Saeed Message-id: <4789BD17.2020604@gmail.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 References: <802024.58831.qm@web45904.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080104) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: recovery FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 07:26:17 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 mahdieh Saeed wrote: > Hi, I have a question about recovery. I removed one directory > with "rm -r ".Is there any way to restore information that removed > with "rm -r". > Short answer: no Long answer: If you have not written anything else to the disk since you can probally use a raw sector editor attempt to reconstruct it - -- Aryeh M. Friedman FloSoft Systems, Java Developer Tools. http://www.flosoft-systems.com Developer, not business, friendly. "Free software != Free beer" Blog: http://www.flosoft-systems.com/flosoft_systems_community/blogs/aryeh/index.php -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHib0XjRvRjGmHRgQRAlEqAJ9/2Lb3b8d7wKzntGNI6p5OKiHD1QCfUoi0 qky06PBLHjx3ZFmHBlYFxUo= =BUcU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 07:28:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F09216A46D for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 07:28:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4001313C507 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 07:28:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from aquarius.dyndns.org (athedsl-165978.home.otenet.gr [85.75.191.248]) by aiolos.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m0D7S23B031649; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:28:02 +0200 Message-ID: <4789BD82.6010907@otenet.gr> Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:28:02 +0200 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071231) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bob Falanga References: <58d1e8d30801101905i2b9ab707w56baf9c8942d2b05@mail.gmail.com> <4786F95F.4050201@otenet.gr> <58d1e8d30801121914l3779e8f8qb2b3ced5d7e55faa@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <58d1e8d30801121914l3779e8f8qb2b3ced5d7e55faa@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: configure printers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 07:28:05 -0000 Bob Falanga wrote: > I am sorry but I don't know what you are talking about, what/where is > DesktopBSD Package Manager? I don't know what it is or where to find > it. HELP > > Thank you, > Bob Falanga > > On 1/11/08, Manolis Kiagias wrote: > >> Bob Falanga wrote: >> >>> I would like to configure a HP laserjet 1018 USB on freebsd. So far I have >>> had no luck. During the boot cycle I can see the Laserjet 1018 listed as a >>> peripheral (ulpt0 HP LaserJet 1018 address 3 rev 9.00/1.00 iclass 7/1 >>> >> using >> >>> bi directional niods). when I go to settings in the pop-down menu then to >>> printers, change to administrator, freebsd doesn't show any printers >>> connected to the computer. >>> >>> HELP >>> >>> thank you, >>> Bob >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> >>> >> I happen to have a Laserjet 1015 that works perfectly. I believe they >> are quite similar. >> I suggest you use CUPS to operate this. A quick guide specific to >> FreeBSD can be found in DesktopBSD's site here: >> >> http://desktopbsd.net/wiki/doku.php?id=doc:printing >> >> Install all the ports mentioned (you may have some already installed >> and others will be pulled as dependencies) and then follow the rest of >> the instructions for setting device permissions and so on. You will have >> the printer running in no time. >> >> Manolis >> >> > > You don't need the DesktopBSD package manager (this is specific to DesktopBSD, though it can be installed in FreeBSD) you just need to install the ports mentioned in the howto using the standard FreeBSD method, i.e: To install cups-base: # whereis cups-base cups-base: /usr/ports/print/cups-base # cd /usr/ports/print/cups-base # make install clean and so on with the rest of the ports. Some of the ports listed will already be installed, and trying to reinstall them will get you an "already installed" message. You can safely ignore it and continue with the next port. After you complete the ports installation, you should follow closely the instructions in the "Configuration" section of the howto. P.S. Make sure you have an updated ports tree before you start installing the ports. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 08:40:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF05A16A417 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:40:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B676613C458 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:40:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JDyNu-0002HP-Jl for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:40:02 +0000 Received: from 78-107-205-25.broadband.corbina.ru ([78.107.205.25]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:40:02 +0000 Received: from swell.k by 78-107-205-25.broadband.corbina.ru with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:40:02 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: swell.k@gmail.com (swell k.) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 11:35:54 +0300 Lines: 6 Message-ID: <86odbq3yxh.fsf@gmail.com> References: <802024.58831.qm@web45904.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 78-107-205-25.broadband.corbina.ru User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (berkeley-unix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:a5v81POzrQYo8VKgqDENhe/UaJA= Sender: news Subject: Re: recovery FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:40:06 -0000 mahdieh Saeed writes: > I have a question about recovery. > I removed one directory with "rm -r ". > Is there any way to restore information that removed with "rm -r". You might want to look at photorec(1) in sysutils/testdisk. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 08:42:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E3E16A469 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:42:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from punosevac@math.arizona.edu) Received: from smtp-gs.math.arizona.edu (math051.cs.arizona.edu [150.135.82.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A2513C4D5 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:42:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from punosevac@math.arizona.edu) Received: from Debian-exim by smtp-gs.math.arizona.edu with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JDyQ2-00058h-Ru for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 01:42:16 -0700 Received: from 71-220-164-236.tcsn.qwest.net ([71.220.164.236] helo=oko.bagdala.net) by smtp-gs.math.arizona.edu with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JDyGp-000581-5i; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 01:32:43 -0700 Message-ID: <47896B8D.9080500@math.arizona.edu> Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:38:21 -0700 From: Predrag Punosevac User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070818) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Levine References: <20080113055128.23509.qmail@simone.iecc.com> In-Reply-To: <20080113055128.23509.qmail@simone.iecc.com> X-ACL-Warn: The HELO/EHLO greeting oko.bagdala.net is invalid X-Outgoing-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ps2pdf problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:42:16 -0000 John Levine wrote: >> However, when I pass the .ps file through the ghostcript with ps2pdf >> slides gets trimmed. >> >> Is there some more advanced option for ps2pdfwr which will enable >> me to conserve the proper width of slides? >> > > It sounds like your pages are formatted as landscape and are being > translated as portrait. See http://ghostscript.com/doc/current/Ps2pdf.htm > > There are also options for larger page size which might be what you want. > It is well-documented bug. http://tug.org/texlive/bugs.html But patch didn't fix problems for me:-( I will have to investigate more. Best, Predrag From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 09:33:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 215D616A421 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:33:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wahjava@gmail.com) Received: from po-out-1718.google.com (po-out-1718.google.com [72.14.252.154]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1DFF13C4D5 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:33:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wahjava@gmail.com) Received: by po-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id y22so464881pof.3 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 01:33:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:to:cc:subject:x-face:references:x-pgp-fp:x-pgp:x-mailer:x-attribution:pgp:organization:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:face:mime-version:content-type; bh=XKo6nJ3H0CL/gH4dibHwby/ozXIqJk0ow/yvXXI7zDc=; b=Gb6RUkNPfxduviMsXreFa2xuiWRbn//GHHvwB+WAfNmidTqw1wqzk4WutfIZyaecoUriyoKEHHEjUYMShYaCemuY/vhyEtrbR/NtJTpxVnSJ6wuA7ccD2RtI1lYg+2+x2Ig5GE9QkYF1oHwJJ1X/dlSmrOy8JjTF+DvovDCQGUU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=to:cc:subject:x-face:references:x-pgp-fp:x-pgp:x-mailer:x-attribution:pgp:organization:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:face:mime-version:content-type; b=S67JCMIaunqpuuhzuGMoDOjYtasOfFcLMcUtU6n1lgIOhjIwWTGFEQSHtA+igYDeDdn3Fw5dLgC2T3Z/f3Yf938c+ro718Yf4dLefN4kiIUvYOzVvEvEi/EUoIZPRpcTPMSsXyTmy1lDYsOB6khhgr6WyplLDs0q56+/WM7JhmE= Received: by 10.115.22.1 with SMTP id z1mr5894965wai.33.1200216784254; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 01:33:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from chateau.d.lf ( [122.162.54.180]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m40sm13106512wag.0.2008.01.13.01.33.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 13 Jan 2008 01:33:04 -0800 (PST) To: =?utf-8?B?4KSF4KSo4KWB4KScIEFudWogU2luZ2g=?= X-Face: "\:nMpJ)EA!j>2nEu-[(+&o:N+CtL^AS\, Jv*LO5qBr#W2.\=d <14989d6e0712300849k58d23055kf32ab529eda9b52@mail.gmail.com> <3120c9e30712300933m4ebbfecbudef3a1120b0c3539@mail.gmail.com> <4778851F.7020006@korn.net> <3120c9e30712301933o5792709bw68afd5db469a3d31@mail.gmail.com> <20071231075952.GA6687@chateau.d.lf> <3120c9e30712310546j19df56f6k3bc6b794c8150df3@mail.gmail.com> <87myrq7hd2.fsf@chateau.d.lf> <3120c9e30801060533g6e5d8767u3b4a0de7697bdc32@mail.gmail.com> X-PGP-FP: 1E00 4679 77E4 F8EE 2E4B 56F2 1F2F 8410 762E 5E74 X-PGP: 762E5E74 X-Mailer: Gnus/5.11 (Oort 5.11) Emacs/22.1.50.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Attribution: =?utf-8?B?4KSG4KS24KWA4KS3?= PGP: 762E5E74 Organization: /\/0/\/3 From: wahjava@gmail.com (Ashish Shukla =?utf-8?B?4KSG4KS24KWA4KS3IOCktg==?= =?utf-8?B?4KWB4KSV4KWN4KSy?=) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:02:48 +0530 In-Reply-To: <3120c9e30801060533g6e5d8767u3b4a0de7697bdc32@mail.gmail.com> (=?utf-8?B?IuCkheCkqOClgeCknA==?= Anuj Singh"'s message of "Sun\, 6 Jan 2008 19\:03\:28 +0530") Message-ID: <87abnadq9r.fsf@chateau.d.lf> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEVfX1/8/PwTExMDAwO0 tLSampr////f398oKCi/v78MDAwICAihq32EAAACU0lEQVQ4jW3UvWvbQBQA8LOJsJIsOajtZAtH Aqq8FLQUvNjhCex2UYpE7XYytPJalxJnFMImqrOkIJfcZtwGgrqEhELQ/XN9p+jLbc+Drfvx7r17 9jNxszXCV2mR9P3ACoKAOM5bugn1hRBRFAnxeErLMN4RIpbwYKwmZfgkMGDNol8PhlFrFDDalQcx BMMwXpwV8KElYqYzpmOA0a4UsC/EmrEU4ptGDq9kghTabP09g9EuFiSpJQOYXslgrEd6Aj8Q7pl+ kcFH3NRlUTIFfvyZwV4sEzwV20a4y2A/BWEYLxdYwk0Gn+Mohfa2X4bXsn8StC0uYdVI4T02cK0F is15ArcZYKeER5Q+f4JofZZHiPshJPt8BwtPrp4kF+KOp+sdpjvOjqpf3n+1bD6dTjk3ySKuZVU1 ezcdpm3h/pL4h9eP3Rw6R5bqa9t86a/1W3OVd7dpzgBMx8YAxVFgvgmqDTwEdQignOVgI1ggoQMA x40CFHzmCHgXcEoAig39MOSATTGt5znQL4qDIRIgNK2LAqYWAl47lBGDSgHNjoOt6vdDkNAtQc9E wN0EJgXQN7aMSABIGU7mMiI5CtQJzX9w9PwQYOApVqBwCMqwp9lmkKzh0qM5uPTAn/Vw0ogazK9m JRjR6pHqEVyqd1XbgPPfKkgAddClxRi49NmKcNMh+JV4T7mzqW1e2jwk3pAPjugGuCfHPLRIP/Qr tLEB9daW7HrvcLIx55i/9zjkfMlO//pnwLHyPcupzrL9AtxrFgTaN/dfGFcjreb+B9wmnzaKpz8p dKsBFjzeRQAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: installing linux after freebsd (multi-boot) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:33:05 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> "=E0=A4=85=E0=A4=A8=E0=A5=81=E0=A4=9C" =3D=3D =E0=A4=85=E0=A4=A8=E0= =A5=81=E0=A4=9C Anuj Singh writes: =E0=A4=85=E0=A4=A8=E0=A5=81=E0=A4=9C> hi, =E0=A4=85=E0=A4=A8=E0=A5=81=E0=A4=9C> Today I removed partitions from F= edora 7 installation , (kept /home =E0=A4=85=E0=A4=A8=E0=A5=81=E0=A4=9C> partition from FC7). Again went t= hrew installation I faced no problem =E0=A4=85=E0=A4=A8=E0=A5=81=E0=A4=9C> this time. Fedora 7 was installed= without using LVM. on free space I =E0=A4=85=E0=A4=A8=E0=A5=81=E0=A4=9C> installed Ubntu7. server for test= purpose. No error. =E0=A4=85=E0=A4=A8=E0=A5=81=E0=A4=9C> Sequence was Freebsd6.2 , Fedora = Core 7 then RHEL4. =E0=A4=85=E0=A4=A8=E0=A5=81=E0=A4=9C> When I tried installation with de= selecting many packages (minimal =E0=A4=85=E0=A4=A8=E0=A5=81=E0=A4=9C> installation) for RHEL5 =E0=A4=85=E0=A4=A8=E0=A5=81=E0=A4=9C> without using LVM , I faced no pr= oblem, rebooted in mid to use =E0=A4=85=E0=A4=A8=E0=A5=81=E0=A4=9C> LVM+minimal RHEL5 again same erro= r. Repetation with minimal What is LVM+minimal RHEL5, you installed RHEL5 (without using LVM), right... or you tried activating existing LVM partitions in your RHEL5 installation (on non-LVM partitions), and got into some error, hmm...? If thats you get, I think is some kind of bug, better post it to some RHEL list or check out (and post it to) Red Hat = Bugzilla, and see if someone has already similar oblem. =E0=A4=85=E0=A4=A8=E0=A5=81=E0=A4=9C> installation+ no LVM could not co= ntinued (found same error again). =E0=A4=85=E0=A4=A8=E0=A5=81=E0=A4=9C> Most likely it was due to partiti= on table. Your partition table looks fine to me. HTH =2D-=20 Ashish Shukla =E0=A4=86=E0=A4=B6=E0=A5=80=E0=A4=B7 =E0=A4=B6=E0=A5=81=E0=A4= =95=E0=A5=8D=E0=A4=B2 http://wahjava.wordpress.com/ =C2=B7-- =C2=B7- =C2=B7=C2=B7=C2=B7=C2=B7 =C2=B7--- =C2=B7- =C2=B7=C2=B7=C2= =B7- =C2=B7- =C2=B7--=C2=B7-=C2=B7 --=C2=B7 -- =C2=B7- =C2=B7=C2=B7 =C2=B7-= =C2=B7=C2=B7 =C2=B7-=C2=B7-=C2=B7- -=C2=B7-=C2=B7 --- -- --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHidrDHy+EEHYuXnQRAnFWAJ9bPkiOH+jamNKm+yCGpc4cY0tLpgCfcJFp bTChf5XTPIuQrGnqQbMoUwg= =lzBh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 10:05:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 989CA16A417 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 10:05:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc5-cmbg1-0-0-cust497.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [86.6.1.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3BA813C457 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 10:05:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@slightlystrange.org) Received: from torus.slightlystrange.org (torus.slightlystrange.org [10.1.3.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by catflap.slightlystrange.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5449F64D0 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:46:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: (from danielby@localhost) by torus.slightlystrange.org (8.14.2/8.13.4/Submit) id m0D9kDQT044782 for questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:46:13 GMT (envelope-from freebsd-questions@slightlystrange.org) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:46:12 +0000 From: Daniel Bye To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080113094612.GA1041@torus.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-PGP-Fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A Cc: Subject: clamav under 6.2-RELEASE/SPARC64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 10:05:17 -0000 --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, I have found that under 6.2-RELEASE/SPARC64, security/clamav is not building correctly - specifically, clamd and clamdscan are not getting compiled. Everything else is built and installed as expected, just not=20 these two rather key components... The same is true of the development snapshot version as well. It works fine on 6.2-RELEASE/I386 and 7.0-RC1/I386. Before going any deeper, has anyone else noticed this? Thanks for your time, Dan --=20 Daniel Bye _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHid3kixf5fBYiFmoRAtHuAJ9S2UZh2VjLPFMra8g3XuZS0Z0G6ACghf6S GEeOXJ+LAkd1mKDAqk6FuHo= =L33N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 10:45:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0716C16A46B for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 10:45:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bunchou@googlemail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E657B13C45B for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 10:45:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bunchou@googlemail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l15so1760123rvb.43 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 02:45:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=3He30PBiY1CxaLc8MPh41vEI0vdTTWwqTub3YtJqcZg=; b=Q4anGQR4GJVAhi/gzomr1euW8mJQSJ8zdV/ZrsVgE8mcI+XTo+1GBmhgYnSF/JVB4UUTRxo0f6Ew05mMFszT2EqV8SVByOkQaElp/k880o7GE7oniDEj+hX51/ENpy7AhYun+9LAKIb+i4y3AvQqlhwUPpZJ5bZamGEVd3j5y4g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=CG947zPEo5JQcVRYcSBRoRLbMP/uMUER5gw4F0N1a8wS9cjpFski+qktQeiMZC1d8TGZDyOL6yGIsj+44tXzc98+EmP0HsrUzQxNyQFQdlo8YfPf/Xf2yOPhl06JAQAsegFXJqa0FpjXZhoHYQWoarhogqB272B0ODonAXX0QZQ= Received: by 10.141.48.10 with SMTP id a10mr3116776rvk.35.1200219433521; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 02:17:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.128.21 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 02:17:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 11:17:13 +0100 From: "=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCSjhEOxsoQg==?=" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Secure update of /usr/src X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 10:45:56 -0000 Hello all, is there any way to securely follow the STABLE branch of FreeBSD, e.g. a cryptographically signed distribution method like portsnap? Afaik, the usual update methods (CVSup, etc.) do not include any authentication / integrity checking. Am I missing something here? Thanks in advance From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 12:02:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2243016A418 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:02:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from move@inbox.lv) Received: from shark4.inbox.lv (shark4.inbox.lv [89.111.3.84]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB14F13C474 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:02:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from move@inbox.lv) Received: by shark4.inbox.lv (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4A3A118345; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:41:50 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost (w20 [10.0.1.30]) by shark4-plain-b64d2.inbox.lv (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163DE182F5 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:41:50 +0200 (EET) Received: from 159.148.227.140 ( [159.148.227.140]) as user move@10.0.1.1 by www.inbox.lv with HTTP; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:41:50 +0200 X-LOCAL: 1 X-Compose: web=www.inbox.lv, node=w20, l=lv, prefs=HTML, sess=unset, fck=Compatible, compose=HTML X-REMOTE-ADDR: 159.148.227.140 X-HTTP-USER-AGENT: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071127 Firefox/2.0.0.11 Message-ID: <1200224510.4789f8fe22c7a@www.inbox.lv> Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:41:50 +0200 From: Matiss To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: inbox.lv Webmail X-Cyrus-Size: 3931 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: (bez temata) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:02:20 -0000 Hey all=0A=0AHope this is more or less right place to ask. =0A=0AWhat I not= iced on my FreeBSD 6.2 installation, that =0Apkg_add -r ImageMagick results= in a file not found error.=0A=0ADTG864# pkg_add -r ImageMagick=0AError: FT= P Unable to get=0Aftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-s= table/Latest/ImageMagick.tbz:=0AFile unavailable (e.g., file not found, no = access)=0A=0Asame with pkg_add -r ImageMagick-nox11.=0A=0Aand sure enough, = indeed there is no ImageMagick.tbz on freebsd ftp=0Aserver for freebsd vers= ion 6. Browsed the net, but couldn't find any=0Ainfo on this. =0A=0AOf cour= se I could compile from ports, but that takes too much time.=0A=0ASo, any i= deas, why there is no ImageMagick.tbz, and what shall one=0Ado? :)=0AMatiss= =0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 12:09:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C4CB16A417 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:09:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B62913C442 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:09:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0DC9pY8032223; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:09:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D088EB8FC; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:09:50 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:09:50 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: mahdieh Saeed Message-ID: <20080113120950.GA52835@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: mahdieh Saeed , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <802024.58831.qm@web45904.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DocE+STaALJfprDB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <802024.58831.qm@web45904.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: recovery FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:09:54 -0000 --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 11:07:16PM -0800, mahdieh Saeed wrote: > Hi, > I have a question about recovery. > I removed one directory with "rm -r ".Is there any way to restore > information that removed with "rm -r". In short, everything that is part of the base system or ports can be restored with some effort. If it is a subdirectory of /usr/src/, you can restore it with csup(1). If it is a subdirectory of /usr/ports you can restore it by updating your ports tree. Other directories under /usr (except /usr/local) can be restored by rebuilding and reinstalling the base system as described in the handbook. If you have removed /usr/local or a subdirectory of it you could reinstall all your ports. If you removed (part of) your home directory or any other non-system data directory, you'd better have a backup.=20 If you have never made a backup of your own data, start now! Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHif+OEnfvsMMhpyURAnGLAJ9lS03wqCX4jufwDeqgux7J05JCdgCgpJq1 MrGATG0D3y3J2kohbNQlNzE= =KV+v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DocE+STaALJfprDB-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 12:14:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41E2316A421 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:14:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bunchou@googlemail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EF2613C455 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:14:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bunchou@googlemail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l15so1778110rvb.43 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 04:14:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=4tkgi+87dwk4pRbDzpeeci5A1DVjPeV9Y4FbFUYq/Ss=; b=KXOkoGVIwZ6EH7Fp4nsIuo7mWcig/b3To6q3F3HIVJ2IaqyGzq+0LUGe+xqvxozYY+6q3RXTcTHy/VYJZLmWPdegkvfGhXsVnwFk96gpw5u6SiVM6T9ss9Ob7xakVYKP5GKLqARi9eDhVWRCywCRw0ed33yoABaXCXif1+/SyXI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=QjHZ/otPK5V5f5/uqIPlPb9aw/u667prD3HakptrVDVeQSq83hrKkK7bJDno0u2mpwVSDlZ1rA0Al0NfyVl5rAc2BHcT84chbUR37uEpZpLeY1CGWjjgDRtJfNuRQyb3Y1izC0plrDrm8WzkPOkkxUBfZ0xGkdeR3Ds6hk9lkwI= Received: by 10.141.98.13 with SMTP id a13mr3129804rvm.222.1200226447596; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 04:14:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.128.21 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 04:14:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:14:07 +0100 From: "=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCSjhEOxsoQg==?=" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Erik Cederstrand" In-Reply-To: <4789F7DE.9090905@cederstrand.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4789F7DE.9090905@cederstrand.dk> Cc: Subject: Re: Secure update of /usr/src X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:14:09 -0000 2008/1/13, Erik Cederstrand : > $BJ8D;(B wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > is there any way to securely follow the STABLE branch of FreeBSD, e.g. > > a cryptographically signed distribution method like portsnap? Afaik, > > the usual update methods (CVSup, etc.) do not include any > > authentication / integrity checking. Am I missing something here? > > freebsd-update(8) is portsnap for the base system. However, you can only > follow RELEASE branches, not STABLE. > > Erik > Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately, I need to follow STABLE and (to be policy-compliant) at the same time make sure that the code has not been tampered with by, for example, checking the signature. Is there a way to do this for STABLE? Best regards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 12:21:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A34816A419 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:21:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from quakenet1@optusnet.com.au) Received: from mail35.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail35.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.133.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A459213C461 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:21:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from quakenet1@optusnet.com.au) Received: from [10.0.0.3] (c220-239-172-188.belrs4.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.239.172.188]) by mail35.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m0DCKwgj024038 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:20:59 +1100 Resent-Message-Id: <200801131220.m0DCKwgj024038@mail35.syd.optusnet.com.au> Resent-To: FreeBSD Questions Message-Id: <0305B94E-7CA3-4176-BF69-83C10233B39B@optusnet.com.au> From: Jerahmy Pocott To: BUGS - Generic chat Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:21:29 +1100 Resent-From: Jerahmy Pocott Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 02:03:50 +1100 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915) Cc: Subject: Problem with rsync to smbfs over vpn X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:21:01 -0000 Hello all, I'm getting a lot of time out problems using rsync between a local filesystem and a remote smb filesystem that is mounted with mount_smbfs over an encrypted wan tunnel. The following are the most common error messages: rsync: recv_generator: failed to stat "somefile": Operation timed out (60) rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write x bytes [sender]: Broken pipe (32) io timeout after 30 seconds -- exiting rsync error: timeout in data send/receive (code 30) at io.c(180) [sender=2.6.8] rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write x bytes [generator]: Broken pipe (32) rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(1124) [generator=2.6.8] rsync error: error in file IO (code 11) at receiver.c(253) [receiver=2.6.8] rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (x bytes received so far) [generator] What would be the likely cause of these? I'm thinking it is either some issue with the wan or tunneling, as I'v had no issues with the exact same set up over lan.. Also these errors are intermittent (though regular) and sometimes it works. The longer it takes to sync the greater the chance for errors it would seem. Thanks, Jerahmy. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 12:31:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD5416A417 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:31:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from move@inbox.lv) Received: from shark3.inbox.lv (shark3.inbox.lv [89.111.3.83]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51FA913C459 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:31:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from move@inbox.lv) Received: by shark3.inbox.lv (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E3FA53321; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:31:04 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost (w10 [10.0.1.144]) by shark3-plain-b64d2.inbox.lv (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85373DB1 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:31:04 +0200 (EET) Received: from 159.148.227.140 ( [159.148.227.140]) as user move@10.0.1.1 by www.inbox.lv with HTTP; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:31:04 +0200 X-LOCAL: 1 X-Compose: web=www.inbox.lv, node=w10, l=lv, prefs=HTML, sess=unset, fck=Compatible, compose=HTML X-REMOTE-ADDR: 159.148.227.140 X-HTTP-USER-AGENT: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071127 Firefox/2.0.0.11 Message-ID: <1200227464.478a0488cfda1@www.inbox.lv> Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:31:04 +0200 From: Matiss To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1200224510.4789f8fe22c7a@www.inbox.lv> In-Reply-To: <1200224510.4789f8fe22c7a@www.inbox.lv> User-Agent: inbox.lv Webmail X-Cyrus-Size: 4758 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: RE: ImageMagick problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:31:06 -0000 So sorry, didn't noticed I don't have a subject in original mail.=0AHey all= =0A Hope this is more or less right place to ask. =0A What I noticed on my = FreeBSD 6.2 installation, that =0A pkg_add -r ImageMagick results in a file= not found error.=0A DTG864# pkg_add -r ImageMagick=0A Error: FTP Unable to= get=0A=0Aftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/La= test/ImageMagick.tbz:=0A File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access)= =0A same with pkg_add -r ImageMagick-nox11.=0A and sure enough, indeed ther= e is no ImageMagick.tbz on freebsd ftp=0A server for freebsd version 6. Bro= wsed the net, but couldn't find any=0A info on this. =0A Of course I could = compile from ports, but that takes too much time.=0A So, any ideas, why the= re is no ImageMagick.tbz, and what shall one=0A do? :)=0A Matiss=0A _______= ________________________________________=0A freebsd-questions@freebsd.org m= ailing list=0A http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions= =0A To unsubscribe, send any mail to=0A"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freeb= sd.org"=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 12:58:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E7B16A418 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:58:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danger@FreeBSD.org) Received: from virtual.micronet.sk (smtp.micronet.sk [84.16.32.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C14F13C44B for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:58:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danger@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by virtual.micronet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D9A10E6C8; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:32:19 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at virtual.micronet.sk Received: from virtual.micronet.sk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (virtual.micronet.sk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JaquactCbZdn; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:32:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from DANGER-PC (danger.mcrn.sk [84.16.37.254]) by virtual.micronet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id D73F810E6C5; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:32:17 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:33:16 +0100 From: Daniel Gerzo X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.99.3) Professional Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <47897289.20080113133316@rulez.sk> To: =?utf-8?B?5paH6bOl?= In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Secure update of /usr/src X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Gerzo List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:58:06 -0000 Hello ??, Sunday, January 13, 2008, 11:17:13 AM, you wrote: > Hello all, > is there any way to securely follow the STABLE branch of FreeBSD, e.g. I am afraid that this isn't currently possible with -STABLE branches. -- Best regards, Daniel mailto:danger@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 13:27:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C11616A418 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:27:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.78.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6986313C448 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:27:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from Lowell-Desk.lan (Lowell-Desk.lan [172.30.250.6]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEA4D2842F; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:27:15 -0500 (EST) Received: by Lowell-Desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 39C231CC1D; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:27:01 -0500 (EST) To: Matiss References: <1200224510.4789f8fe22c7a@www.inbox.lv> <1200227464.478a0488cfda1@www.inbox.lv> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:27:01 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1200227464.478a0488cfda1@www.inbox.lv> (Matiss's message of "Sun\, 13 Jan 2008 14\:31\:04 +0200") Message-ID: <44ejclkg9m.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ImageMagick problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:27:21 -0000 Matiss writes: > So sorry, didn't noticed I don't have a subject in original mail. > Hey all > Hope this is more or less right place to ask. > What I noticed on my FreeBSD 6.2 installation, that > pkg_add -r ImageMagick results in a file not found error. > DTG864# pkg_add -r ImageMagick > Error: FTP Unable to get > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/Latest/ImageMagick.tbz: > File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) > same with pkg_add -r ImageMagick-nox11. > and sure enough, indeed there is no ImageMagick.tbz on freebsd ftp > server for freebsd version 6. Browsed the net, but couldn't find any > info on this. > Of course I could compile from ports, but that takes too much time. > So, any ideas, why there is no ImageMagick.tbz, and what shall one > do? :) The current state of the port: http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=graphics&portname=ImageMagick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 14:38:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C422D16A468 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:38:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from takhoos@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc1-s19.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc1-s19.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.91]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1CCB13C455 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:38:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from takhoos@hotmail.com) Received: from BAY124-W15 ([207.46.11.178]) by bay0-omc1-s19.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 13 Jan 2008 06:38:22 -0800 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [75.127.192.172] From: To: Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:38:21 -0500 Importance: Normal Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jan 2008 14:38:22.0174 (UTC) FILETIME=[F25D4FE0:01C855F1] Subject: Switching username using SFTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:38:22 -0000 When I ssh into a system which has different login name from the system I'm= on I use this syntax:=20 ssh -l host.domain.com. =20 How does one do this with SFTP on the command line? The -l switch doesn't = work. The man pages on SFTP makes no mention of this. -- Joe _________________________________________________________________ Put your friends on the big screen with Windows Vista=AE + Windows Live=99. http://www.microsoft.com/windows/shop/specialoffers.mspx?ocid=3DTXT_TAGLM_C= PC_MediaCtr_bigscreen_012008= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 14:51:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 330D016A417 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:51:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcs@draenor.org) Received: from mx.unseen.co.za (mx.unseen.co.za [192.96.96.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2AEF13C442 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:51:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcs@draenor.org) Received: from marcs by aztec.co.za with local (Exim 4.34) id 1JE4Bm-0007do-Uc; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:51:54 +0200 Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:51:54 +0200 From: Marc Silver To: takhoos@hotmail.com Message-ID: <20080113145154.GD29976@draenor.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-PGP-Key: http://draenor.org/pubkey.asc Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Switching username using SFTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:51:58 -0000 Hi there, You can simply enter a command such as: $ sftp username@hostname.domain.com Cheers, Marc On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 09:38:21AM -0500, takhoos@hotmail.com wrote: > > When I ssh into a system which has different login name from the > system I'm on I use this syntax: ssh -l host.domain.com. > > How does one do this with SFTP on the command line? The -l switch > doesn't work. The man pages on SFTP makes no mention of this. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 14:53:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E9A516A417 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:53:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from hs-out-2122.google.com (hs-out-0708.google.com [64.233.178.247]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D708B13C43E for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:53:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by hs-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id h53so1894906hsh.11 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 06:53:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.151.11.17 with SMTP id o17mr1967300ybi.120.1200236033003; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 06:53:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio ( [67.189.206.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 34sm9305819wra.23.2008.01.13.06.53.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 13 Jan 2008 06:53:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:53:41 -0500 From: Gerard To: FreeBSD Question Message-ID: <20080113095341.4e34f42e@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20080113082515.19316v8x3pbs3tcs@intranet.encontacto.net> References: <64c038660801040516u5c42a6cpadb475ad67fb4730@mail.gmail.com> <20080104174955.52aa33fd@gumby.homeunix.com> <64c038660801041029t1a9662bayed3ca02fd46c7ece@mail.gmail.com> <64c038660801041226k1d350bc6p727e4666ea295727@mail.gmail.com> <477FFE14.1010704@monkeybrains.net> <477FFF63.50004@gmail.com> <47801D54.8050709@gmail.com> <47803E3F.2080005@monkeybrains.net> <47804901.6090007@gmail.com> <4786BF45.8030602@monkeybrains.net> <4786CEDC.3050009@chuckr.org> <20080111170711.t6wxj1bc68cgwwk4@webmail.leidinger.net> <4787E597.9040902@chuckr.org> <20080112213747.443a4833@deskjail> <20080113082515.19316v8x3pbs3tcs@intranet.encontacto.net> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.5; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Face: 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 X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q User-Agent: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.3; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/hFA7_cI0yCnF4itfD9FiIcp"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Subject: Re: Another question based on: Re: HOW-TO get Flash7 working! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD Question List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:53:59 -0000 --Sig_/hFA7_cI0yCnF4itfD9FiIcp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:25:15 -0600 eculp wrote: [snip] =20 > Flash is becoming more dominate daily and there are many sites that =20 > are basically unusable without it. Some banking, telco, etc. sites, =20 > etc. That are difficult if not impossible too use for account > access without flash and don't pay much attention to end user > requests based on the installed base of Flash[89]. That brings up > another detail, many sites now require Flash[89] even though they > don't actually need it probably to impress their customers with their > being on the technological, bleeding edge. Unfortunately, the poor support for Flash, as well as other common web features under FBSD, is a prime reason that I continue to keep my WinXP PC operational. At least Window's Internet Explorer, despite its real or alleged problems, can correctly access virtually any site I want or need to visit. As the above poster stated, being able to correctly and expeditiously navigate through a banking site is an important criteria. I belong to a state 'Officials Association' that deals with officiating High School sports. Their site is written in such a way that Flash with either Windows Media Player or QuickTime are required to properly view the site. Try as I might, I have never gotten either Opera or Firefox using FBSD to correctly view that site. I basically just gave up on it. The same problem exists with many sites sponsored by Google for instance. If this was 1990, perhaps I could understand it. However, considering the present state of computing, the fact that plug-ins like Flash are not simple drop-in applets, similar to the way Internet Explorer handles them, is simply not acceptable. Just my 2=A2. --=20 Gerard gerard@seibercom.net The next unpopular group to have its rights taken away should be illegal aliens. --Sig_/hFA7_cI0yCnF4itfD9FiIcp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkeKJfUACgkQ6DWTaTcTwMmRlgCginGIKWuU5zunNb7/wJOM8w9J 4E4AoNiSkhgiHIT6VQtycHDguGuU2V8R =OJqi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/hFA7_cI0yCnF4itfD9FiIcp-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 14:56:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED74116A420 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:56:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erik@cepheid.org) Received: from mail.cepheid.org (aleph.cepheid.org [72.232.60.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB9413C457 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:56:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erik@cepheid.org) Received: by mail.cepheid.org (Postfix, from userid 1006) id 3DD269B4058; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:56:12 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:56:12 -0600 From: Erik Osterholm To: takhoos@hotmail.com Message-ID: <20080113145612.GA6298@aleph.cepheid.org> Mail-Followup-To: Erik Osterholm , takhoos@hotmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Switching username using SFTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:56:13 -0000 On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 09:38:21AM -0500, takhoos@hotmail.com wrote: > > When I ssh into a system which has different login name from the > system I'm on I use this syntax: ssh -l host.domain.com. > > How does one do this with SFTP on the command line? The -l switch > doesn't work. The man pages on SFTP makes no mention of this. > > -- Joe The man page implies the correct use at the top: sftp [[user@]host[:dir[/]]] So sftp user@host.example.com works. Lower down in the file, it also mentions using options, and it turns out that this works as well: sftp -o User=username host.example.com Erik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 15:15:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B98416A419 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:15:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36BB013C45A for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:15:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0DFFOuL002810 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:15:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0DFFMfH002807 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:15:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:15:22 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080113161334.V2806@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: BUGGY growfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:15:46 -0000 anyone can fix it completely? i patched it so it DO works when sectorsize!=512 bytes. but when growing to 1.3TB it prints negative values due to overflow but it works. but would it work on larger partitions? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 16:11:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B19D916A41B for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:11:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dead_line@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc1-s15.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc1-s15.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4EA513C45B for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:11:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dead_line@hotmail.com) Received: from BAY104-W29 ([65.54.175.129]) by bay0-omc1-s15.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 13 Jan 2008 07:59:04 -0800 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [62.150.204.104] From: Dead Line To: Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:59:04 +0000 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jan 2008 15:59:04.0875 (UTC) FILETIME=[38D6D7B0:01C855FD] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1256" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: ports download speed! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:11:05 -0000 Hello People.. I recently have noticed something! Im installing FreeBSD 6.2R fresh install, When im downloading anything using the ports, The download speed appear as it is 33 K or 32 K! In fact im on DSL 512 K. Im a missing something silly here? is it the actual download speed ? or the estimated? or? Thanks. Sultan. _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 16:37:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA6816A417 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:37:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF5813C457 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:37:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0DGbdu7085896; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:37:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1EAE6B8FC; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:37:38 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:37:38 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: FreeBSD Question Message-ID: <20080113163738.GA64921@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Question , eculp References: <47801D54.8050709@gmail.com> <47803E3F.2080005@monkeybrains.net> <47804901.6090007@gmail.com> <4786BF45.8030602@monkeybrains.net> <4786CEDC.3050009@chuckr.org> <20080111170711.t6wxj1bc68cgwwk4@webmail.leidinger.net> <4787E597.9040902@chuckr.org> <20080112213747.443a4833@deskjail> <20080113082515.19316v8x3pbs3tcs@intranet.encontacto.net> <20080113095341.4e34f42e@scorpio> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080113095341.4e34f42e@scorpio> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: eculp Subject: Re: Another question based on: Re: HOW-TO get Flash7 working! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:37:48 -0000 --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 09:53:41AM -0500, Gerard wrote: > I belong to a state 'Officials Association' that deals with officiating > High School sports. Their site is written in such a way that Flash with > either Windows Media Player or QuickTime are required to properly view > the site. So their message is, "We're not interested in people who don't use windows". There is not anything that the FreeBSD community can do about that.=20 > Try as I might, I have never gotten either Opera or Firefox > using FBSD to correctly view that site. I basically just gave up on it. > The same problem exists with many sites sponsored by Google for > instance. >=20 > If this was 1990, perhaps I could understand it. However, considering > the present state of computing, the fact that plug-ins like Flash are > not simple drop-in applets, similar to the way Internet Explorer > handles them, is simply not acceptable. Then go and complain to the people who wrote flash. If they want to release plugins for Firefox on FreeBSD they can do so.=20 Since Flash is closed-source, there isn't a lot people in the FreeBSD community can do about it. There are several groups working on open-source implementations of Flash, but these efforts are incomplete due to lack of documentation and possibly volunteers. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHij5SEnfvsMMhpyURAkOoAJ48m1Mq5fvOiaBkQb6WsIrbBpLXCQCgrlOY nNgFw91+pXPMy5aUnzrj8RU= =aM9w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 16:38:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1603216A419 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:38:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from move@inbox.lv) Received: from shark4.inbox.lv (shark4.inbox.lv [89.111.3.84]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9022713C458 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:38:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from move@inbox.lv) Received: by shark4.inbox.lv (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9587F1844F; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:38:54 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost (w15 [10.0.1.166]) by shark4-plain-b64d2.inbox.lv (Postfix) with ESMTP id 701AC1843C; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:38:54 +0200 (EET) Received: from 159.148.227.140 ( [159.148.227.140]) as user move@10.0.1.1 by www.inbox.lv with HTTP; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:38:54 +0200 X-LOCAL: 1 X-Compose: web=www.inbox.lv, node=w15, l=lv, prefs=HTML, sess=unset, fck=Compatible, compose=HTML X-REMOTE-ADDR: 159.148.227.140 X-HTTP-USER-AGENT: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071127 Firefox/2.0.0.11 Message-ID: <1200242334.478a3e9fbe22e@www.inbox.lv> Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:38:55 +0200 From: Matiss To: Lowell Gilbert References: <1200224510.4789f8fe22c7a@www.inbox.lv> <1200227464.478a0488cfda1@www.inbox.lv> <44ejclkg9m.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> In-Reply-To: <44ejclkg9m.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> User-Agent: inbox.lv Webmail X-Cyrus-Size: 3203 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ImageMagick problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:38:57 -0000 Thanks!=0A=0AI guess I should just wait then, and compile from ports for no= w.=0AThanks :)=0A Quoting Lowell Gilbert : =0A The current state of the po= rt:=0A=0Ahttp://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=3Dgraphics&po= rtname=3DImageMagick=0A =0A=0ALinks:=0A------=0A[1] mailto:freebsd-question= s-local@be-well.ilk.org=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 17:00:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76F9016A417 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:00:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tkopets@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC2D13C45D for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:00:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tkopets@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l15so1845026rvb.43 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:00:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=fZPPF1eKi4ubm52wCacO5XIA3NxAEAWGlnnXZe/kxdM=; b=FMHCpOnkx+NDoW3M4/u9swJ9eWoxP/picenBZPufuGu7YEUfFrnRi1dPJzwhvWYXL3Jmg3MfO+/NU1MzkRskk0gGdO2QH2Amla79Xzx1wydBcrq8Drh/o8Ucxg7tBFG8W1FnI9d3Vdo/asF+tbzZ0shrLm5e/WJA/ExZae42M6A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Lvj3OGyYG6S5zYikz6s+r4JLdzLmexVSSgbukdfnVHIIcOUuV3tQNWZVVsphzEX1GbkKREhNFVfQB9wemmCxMb/8/1DR11E8YwJW1cljF/ksCKeDh9jowWf9u4CBpnMJmsP7F09l/LxM/PosN7LJgEuuXcjlcSk+JDe30yy8CSU= Received: by 10.141.79.12 with SMTP id g12mr3255516rvl.29.1200241992133; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:33:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.251.21 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:33:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:33:12 +0200 From: "Taras Kopets" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: pccard problem - old toshiba 440cdx X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:00:16 -0000 Hi list! I'm trying to make my PCMCIA ethernet card (3C589D-TP) to work, but with no luck. At boot time I get: CIS is too long -- truncating pccard1: Card has no functions! cbb1: PC Card card activation failed I've tried to google this problem on the web, but no solutions found, so I've decided to look at source of pccard. The origin of my problem comes from src/sys/dev/pccard/pccard_cis.c. I'm not expert in C, but the code I see in this file seems to be strange: --------------- CODE ------------- .................... #define PCCARD_CIS_SIZE 4096 .................... .................... int pccard_scan_cis(device_t bus, device_t dev, pccard_scan_t fct, void *arg) { .................... struct pccard_tuple tuple; .................... .................... tuple.memt = rman_get_bustag(res); tuple.memh = rman_get_bushandle(res); tuple.ptr = 0; DPRINTF(("cis mem map 0x%x (resource: 0x%lx)\n", (unsigned int) tuple.memh, rman_get_start(res))); tuple.mult = 2; .................... .................... if (tuple.mult * tuple.ptr >= PCCARD_CIS_SIZE - 1 - 32 /* ad hoc value */ ) { printf("CIS is too long -- truncating\n"); tuple.code = CISTPL_END; } else { /* get the tuple code */ tuple.code = pccard_cis_read_1(&tuple, tuple.ptr); } --------------- END OF CODE ------------- The strange thing is this: if (tuple.mult * tuple.ptr >= PCCARD_CIS_SIZE-1- 32) >From the code we have this values: tuple.mult=2 tuple.ptr=0 PCCARD_CIS_SIZE=4096 So we will always get to the "CIS is too long -- truncating" piece of code: if (0*2 >= 4096-1-32). Can this be the cause of problems? Please someone tell me I'm wrong. Thanks in advance, Sorry for my English, Taras Kopets From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 17:20:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D577916A418 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:20:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd08@dfwlp.com) Received: from pollux.dfwlp.com (rrcs-64-183-212-244.sw.biz.rr.com [64.183.212.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A53F713C45D for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:20:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd08@dfwlp.com) Received: from athena.dfwlp.com (athena.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.82]) (authenticated bits=0) by pollux.dfwlp.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0DHKhoh040454 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 11:20:43 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from freebsd08@dfwlp.com) From: Jonathan Horne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 11:20:42 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801131120.43141.freebsd08@dfwlp.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on pollux.dfwlp.com Subject: using restore to recover a freebsd system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:20:45 -0000 ive been practicing using dump and restore. the dumping is easy... i think. my dump command is as such: dump -0uLaf /opt/backups/athena-root-0 / /opt is an NFS mounted share from another server. the dump completed without errors. however, when i restore, i do this: 1) install a new drive in the system 2) boot to livefs cd, use the sysinstaller to fdisk and label the new drive 3) use configure to activate the network interface 4) drop to fixit shell 5) mount my nfs share via its IP (no resolv seems to be working, even if i make a resolv.conf) at this point, i have tried restoring the automatically mounted slices that label made, and i have also tried unmounting everything, and remounting single slices (ie, instead of /mnt, and then usr mounted under /mnt/usr, having them all non-tree-like mounted to /mnt/root /mnt/usr /mnt/var, etc). every time, restore begins by complaining that it expected file xxxx, but got file yyyy. it goes for a bit, and then dumps. it also complains that file system is full, but i ahve checked and rechecked that i have the right file systems mounted to each mount (ie, not mounting a 500mb temp to where usr needs to be). my restore command was as such: cd /mnt/usr restore /opt/backups/athena-usr-0 root actually does complete, but usr dumps, and bombs out. can anyone give me some pointers for successfully using restore to reload a dump? im trying to nail this process down from a total disaster recovery point of view. thanks, -- Jonathan Horne http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org freebsd08 _@_ dfwlp.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 17:26:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D1A616A41B for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:26:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bunchou@googlemail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E351A13C44B for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:26:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bunchou@googlemail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l15so1852806rvb.43 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:26:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=ip46wScUQTd2zLaDR8O7+8Bvtvi9nAAdn16nSJzN9Sg=; b=rKApEryZ/Eu5ZS2vcRz/GpiVDLelWJ1ZyYMgvhORFy1FiTTnYzor00cbeNW7+Gchay6EoErvhfsYHJ4QBzzEq1EVJWYvCw5D0dQczJ6EuRgMp7PCc8aXlQIGuryhZVcmjUrjG+Tax2O5oK2WBQ13bN53SgaCqHg9VDYnh5BTNE0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NkUIMhQHfoqjJ7JrNJmXaAAHwoC+B4G3bO5NH88gny6JK3qcVE5s6BLsECHgc2p06hkMIs4iId+8OfZu27iqRqU4QJuwnTXgEfC7NPT4Cl/6OhPgR1zfBYyHYFYmT5Wj7HMqdw0O+VD8QPEh4vh9aaMAKXhsU65RoJJtISklweI= Received: by 10.141.74.17 with SMTP id b17mr3268750rvl.123.1200245201481; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:26:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.128.21 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:26:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:26:41 +0100 From: "=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCSjhEOxsoQg==?=" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Erik Cederstrand" In-Reply-To: <478A238A.4060106@cederstrand.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4789F7DE.9090905@cederstrand.dk> <478A238A.4060106@cederstrand.dk> Cc: Subject: Re: Secure update of /usr/src X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:26:42 -0000 08/01/13 $B$K(B Erik Cederstrand $B$5$s$O=q$-$^$7$?(B: > $BJ8D;(B wrote: > > 2008/1/13, Erik Cederstrand : > >> $BJ8D;(B wrote: > >>> Hello all, > >>> > >>> is there any way to securely follow the STABLE branch of FreeBSD, e.g. > >>> a cryptographically signed distribution method like portsnap? Afaik, > >>> the usual update methods (CVSup, etc.) do not include any > >>> authentication / integrity checking. Am I missing something here? > >> freebsd-update(8) is portsnap for the base system. However, you can only > >> follow RELEASE branches, not STABLE. > >> > >> Erik > >> > > Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately, I need to follow STABLE and (to > > be policy-compliant) at the same time make sure that the code has not > > been tampered with by, for example, checking the signature. Is there a > > way to do this for STABLE? > > Just making sure; you are aware that STABLE only means "stable API" and > is in fact the cutting edge for the 6.x line, right? If you want to > follow a stable release branch, as in "is tested, supported by security > team, and will not break in interesting ways", RELEASE is the branch to > follow. freebsd-update(8) will fetch the security updates for you as > they are applied to the RELEASE branch. > > Erik > Yes, I am aware of that fact. However, 7.x STABLE is the only version apart from CURRENT that I was able to get working reliably on the hardware in question. And alas, even though the system in question is used for testing only,I am still bound by the company security policy in this matter... Guess I will have to wait until 7.0 is released. Thanks for your help in this matter. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 18:58:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3CD716A46E for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:58:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from unsane.co.uk (www.unsane.co.uk [85.233.185.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E96113C44B for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:58:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from crab.unsane.co.uk (crab.unsane.co.uk [10.0.0.111]) (authenticated bits=0) by unsane.co.uk (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m0DIQWha005802 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:26:32 GMT (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Message-ID: <478A5769.8000904@unsane.co.uk> Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:24:41 +0000 From: Vince User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071121) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCSjhEOxsoQg==?= References: <4789F7DE.9090905@cederstrand.dk> <478A238A.4060106@cederstrand.dk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Erik Cederstrand Subject: Re: Secure update of /usr/src X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:58:54 -0000 Hi, $BJ8D;(B wrote: > 08/01/13 $B$K(B Erik Cederstrand $B$5$s$O=q$-$^$7$?(B: >> $BJ8D;(B wrote: >>> 2008/1/13, Erik Cederstrand : >>>> $BJ8D;(B wrote: >>>>> Hello all, >>>>> >>>>> is there any way to securely follow the STABLE branch of FreeBSD, e.g. >>>>> a cryptographically signed distribution method like portsnap? Afaik, >>>>> the usual update methods (CVSup, etc.) do not include any >>>>> authentication / integrity checking. Am I missing something here? >>>> freebsd-update(8) is portsnap for the base system. However, you can only >>>> follow RELEASE branches, not STABLE. >>>> >>>> Erik < >> Erik >> > Yes, I am aware of that fact. However, 7.x STABLE is the only version > apart from CURRENT that I was able to get working reliably on the > hardware in question. And alas, even though the system in question is > used for testing only,I am still bound by the company security policy > in this matter... Guess I will have to wait until 7.0 is released. > Thanks for your help in this matter. > I'm not suer how often its updated but you can to a limited degree follow the RELENG_7_0 branch via freebsd-update already (see http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2007-11-11-freebsd-major-version-upgrade.html) However I'd say overall you may be better waiting for the release. Vince _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 19:30:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B13716A417 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 19:30:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+SD=a103e584@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from turtle-out.mxes.net (turtle-out.mxes.net [216.86.168.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0947613C465 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 19:30:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+SD=a103e584@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by turtle-in.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10C69163F5F for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:11:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44DBED05B8 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:11:36 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 19:11:29 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080113191129.7b56c32f@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.5; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Secure update of /usr/src X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 19:30:21 -0000 On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 11:17:13 +0100 "=E6=96=87=E9=B3=A5" wrote: > Hello all, >=20 > is there any way to securely follow the STABLE branch of FreeBSD, e.g. > a cryptographically signed distribution method like portsnap? Afaik, > the usual update methods (CVSup, etc.) do not include any > authentication / integrity checking. Am I missing something here? I guess you could use anonymous cvs over ssh. The servers and their fingerprints are listed in the Handbook. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 20:49:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA94816A41A for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:49:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D8113C478 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:49:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0DKn8Ge001464 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:49:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0DKn6dg001461 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:49:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:49:06 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: FreeBSD Question In-Reply-To: <20080113095341.4e34f42e@scorpio> Message-ID: <20080113213851.S1458@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <64c038660801040516u5c42a6cpadb475ad67fb4730@mail.gmail.com> <20080104174955.52aa33fd@gumby.homeunix.com> <64c038660801041029t1a9662bayed3ca02fd46c7ece@mail.gmail.com> <64c038660801041226k1d350bc6p727e4666ea295727@mail.gmail.com> <477FFE14.1010704@monkeybrains.net> <477FFF63.50004@gmail.com> <47801D54.8050709@gmail.com> <47803E3F.2080005@monkeybrains.net> <47804901.6090007@gmail.com> <4786BF45.8030602@monkeybrains.net> <4786CEDC.3050009@chuckr.org> <20080111170711.t6wxj1bc68cgwwk4@webmail.leidinger.net> <4787E597.9040902@chuckr.org> <20080112213747.443a4833@deskjail> <20080113082515.19316v8x3pbs3tcs@intranet.encontacto.net> <20080113095341.4e34f42e@scorpio> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: Another question based on: Re: HOW-TO get Flash7 working! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:49:39 -0000 > > Unfortunately, the poor support for Flash, as well as other common web > features under FBSD, is a prime reason that I continue to keep my WinXP flash is a proprietary feature, which doesn't run FreeBSD. you may try to use linux browsers under emulation, you may use windows or do whatever else. using windows could be even better as most crappy sites are designed having only windows in mind and (w)internet explorer. or - like me, you may simply don't use it. i have a lot of choices about what bank to use, and the usability of web banking on MY (html/http compatible anyway) system was important. the bank i chose doesn't only run without flash and java, it just have best of all webservice, and have best bank offer anyway. i do EVERYTHING through internet, being actually once in their office. i think there is something similar in your country. if others require flash7, java or other craps, they just don't want me to be their client. same with every other sites. nothing wrong if they use flash to make some animation, but with site completely usable without this. if it's unusable - it means they don't like people like me to use/read that page. so i don't read and say "no thanks" to tell you the truth - such site are usually not useful even without flash :) so - while i've tested linux-opera port working with flash7, i just don't use it, and use native opera (and links-gui). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 20:53:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A752616A421 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:53:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C4D013C4D5 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:52:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0DKqbYf001497; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:52:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0DKqWdK001494; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:52:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:52:32 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: mahdieh Saeed In-Reply-To: <802024.58831.qm@web45904.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20080113215156.G1478@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <802024.58831.qm@web45904.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: recovery FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:53:01 -0000 > Hi, > I have a question about recovery. > I removed one directory with "rm -r ".Is there any way to restore information that removed with "rm -r". simply use your backups, or if it was system data - reread it from install CD/DVD/FTP > > Please help me, > > Regards, > Saeed > > > --------------------------------- > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 20:56:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B9916A419 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:56:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0DF813C459 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:56:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0DKtuZU001514; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:55:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0DKtnxx001511; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:55:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:55:49 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Predrag Punosevac In-Reply-To: <47893259.7080108@math.arizona.edu> Message-ID: <20080113215519.K1510@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <47893259.7080108@math.arizona.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ps2pdf problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:56:20 -0000 > For those unfamiliar with the package one needs to go through > > .tex --> .dvi --> .ps --> .pdf > > for graphics to display properly (pdflatex is not an option nor it is > dvipdfm) are you sure about .ps stage? there is pdflatex, makes perfect pdfs From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 21:18:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4FE716A417 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:18:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from punosevac@math.arizona.edu) Received: from smtp-gs.math.arizona.edu (math051.cs.arizona.edu [150.135.82.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AAF713C442 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:18:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from punosevac@math.arizona.edu) Received: from Debian-exim by smtp-gs.math.arizona.edu with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JEADP-00066j-Ef for questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:18:00 -0700 Received: from 71-220-164-236.tcsn.qwest.net ([71.220.164.236] helo=oko.bagdala.net) by smtp-gs.math.arizona.edu with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JEADH-00066D-9s; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:17:51 -0700 Message-ID: <478A1F10.70201@math.arizona.edu> Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 07:24:16 -0700 From: Predrag Punosevac User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070818) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wojciech Puchar References: <47893259.7080108@math.arizona.edu> <20080113215519.K1510@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20080113215519.K1510@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ACL-Warn: The HELO/EHLO greeting oko.bagdala.net is invalid X-Outgoing-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ps2pdf problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:18:01 -0000 Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> For those unfamiliar with the package one needs to go through >> >> .tex --> .dvi --> .ps --> .pdf >> >> for graphics to display properly (pdflatex is not an option nor it is >> dvipdfm) > > are you sure about .ps stage? there is pdflatex, makes perfect pdfs > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Yes, I am sure:-). Powerdot class of presentations is designed to use PS tricks and can not be compiled with pdflatex or should I say you can compile but you will lose most of graphics and colors. If you want to try let me know of the mailing list and I will send you a file for you to try. By the way powerdot class is not included in the standard teTeX distribution and has never been ported to FreeBSD. That is way, I use TeXLive. On the same note teTeX port of FreeBSD doesn't contain the fonts necessary for building the package from the source(which is trivial), actually even worse it contains the older version of fonts with lots of dependencies. teTeX is dead and the efforts of the community should be directed towards porting TeXLive to FreeBSD. Best, Predrag Punosevac From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 22:26:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E385416A41A for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:26:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+SD=a103e584@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFFC413C46E for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:26:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+SD=a103e584@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D11C7D04FF for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:26:48 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:26:45 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080113222645.5b7a15d3@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.5; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: ports download speed! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:26:51 -0000 On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:59:04 +0000 Dead Line wrote: > > Hello People.. > > I recently have noticed something! > Im installing FreeBSD 6.2R fresh install, When im downloading > anything using the ports, The download speed appear as it is 33 K or > 32 K! In fact im on DSL 512 K. > Im a missing something silly here? is it the actual download > speed ? or the estimated? or? 32kBytes/s * 8bits/Bytes = 256kbit/s You are getting 50% of your nominal speed, that's not particularly unusual. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 22:38:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C86F16A468 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:38:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aldenpease963@peaseenterprises.com) Received: from outbound-mail-31.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-31.bluehost.com [69.89.18.151]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5248013C457 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:38:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aldenpease963@peaseenterprises.com) Received: (qmail 23534 invoked by uid 0); 13 Jan 2008 22:11:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO host125.hostmonster.com) (74.220.207.125) by mailproxy2.bluehost.com with SMTP; 13 Jan 2008 22:11:32 -0000 Received: from d233090.tidewater.net ([12.148.233.90] helo=HomeComputer) by host125.hostmonster.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JEB3E-0006hA-Al for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:11:32 -0700 Message-ID: From: "Alden Pease" To: Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:10:32 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6000.16480 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6000.16545 X-Identified-User: {727:host125.hostmonster.com:peaseent:peaseenterprises.com} {sentby:smtp auth 12.148.233.90 authed with aldenpease963@peaseenterprises.com} Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Realtek RTL8139 Family Fast Eithernet Adapter Plugin X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:38:12 -0000 Can you release a pack sometime in the future, like in version 8.0, with = a Realtek RTL8139 Family Fast Eithernet Adapter plugin? Please email me = back. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 22:47:33 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1410B16A417 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:47:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9490413C45D for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:47:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0DMlUnP082256; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:47:30 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 05015B8FC; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:47:30 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:47:29 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: Alden Pease Message-ID: <20080113224729.GA74507@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Alden Pease , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Realtek RTL8139 Family Fast Eithernet Adapter Plugin X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:47:33 -0000 --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 05:10:32PM -0500, Alden Pease wrote: > Can you release a pack sometime in the future, like in version 8.0, > with a Realtek RTL8139 Family Fast Eithernet Adapter plugin? This chip is already supported by the re(4) driver. See http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=3Dre&apropos=3D0&sektion=3D4&manpa= th=3DFreeBSD+6.2-RELEASE&format=3Dhtml Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHipUBEnfvsMMhpyURAh8hAJ9Rp/7i6xpxHGtKlyKsf+pQfmU4fACgld7j VsOMyXf1PrVANevem/gja/s= =ghtM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 22:47:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED2516A498 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:47:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D597013C44B for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:47:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0DMlMjv001382; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:47:22 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0DMlJJg001379; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:47:21 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:47:19 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Predrag Punosevac In-Reply-To: <478A1F10.70201@math.arizona.edu> Message-ID: <20080113234637.G1368@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <47893259.7080108@math.arizona.edu> <20080113215519.K1510@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <478A1F10.70201@math.arizona.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ps2pdf problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:47:45 -0000 >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Yes, I am sure:-). Powerdot class of presentations is designed to use PS > tricks and can not be compiled with pdflatex or should I say you can compile > but you will lose most of graphics and colors. > ok sorry i dodn't read carefully. i just use standard latex from tetex port, nothing more. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 22:48:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C6816A41A for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:48:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B5DB13C447 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:48:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0DMmA67001389; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:48:10 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0DMm8bF001386; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:48:10 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:48:08 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Alden Pease In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080113234745.A1368@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Realtek RTL8139 Family Fast Eithernet Adapter Plugin X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:48:29 -0000 adapter plugin? what do you mean. rtl8139 driver works fine in 6.* and 7.* On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Alden Pease wrote: > Can you release a pack sometime in the future, like in version 8.0, with a Realtek RTL8139 Family Fast Eithernet Adapter plugin? Please email me back. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 23:30:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2864A16A41A for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:30:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net) Received: from dd17730.kasserver.com (dd17730.kasserver.com [85.13.138.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D69B813C45D for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:30:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net) Received: from nermal.rz1.convenimus.net (sub87-230-112-211.he-dsl.de [87.230.112.211]) by dd17730.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE33218843D68 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:30:30 +0100 (CET) Received: by nermal.rz1.convenimus.net (Postfix, from userid 8) id B40D515217; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:57:55 +0100 (CET) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Path: not-for-mail From: Christian Baer Newsgroups: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:57:55 +0100 (CET) Organization: Convenimus Projekt Lines: 36 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: sunny.rz1.convenimus.net X-Trace: nermal.rz1.convenimus.net 1200265075 29850 192.168.100.5 (13 Jan 2008 22:57:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@convenimus.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:57:55 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD/6.2-RELEASE-p9 (sparc64)) Subject: Changing the output of uname -m or -p X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:30:32 -0000 Hello Folks! This may be a bit of a hacker's question, but I'll just go for it in here - at least for starters. I want to play a prank on a friend of mine. He does a csup at least once a day and also makes a new world at least once a day. He is pretty nutty about that which is ok for some -CURRENT system, but he also does that on production systems. Now I don't want to judge him about that, but he is a bit sensitive about the output of uname. The version is very important to him. :-) The prank I want to pull is to somehow change the output of uname -m to read something different. The best thing would be to change that to something ancient like C-64, i286, i8086. Or, if only plattforms that FreeBSD supports are allowed, then mips, alpha or sparc64 on an i386. That should keep him thinking for a while. :-) I don't want to do any damage, so I just want to screw up the output of uname and the system should work normally apart from that. I realise that I may have to change some of the OS's code and that's not a problem. I just don't know where to look for this kind of thing and I don't really want to do too much reading just for a little prank. This guy is a really good friend of mine but sometimes get up my neck because I am much more conservative about updating my production systems. As you can see on this machine, I go along the lines of RELENG_6_2 which he can't understand. This should buy me a little peace and quite for a week or two. Getting access to his machines is no problem as I am often at his place. Can this even be done and if so how? Regards, Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 00:03:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B8C16A421 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:03:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA2A713C459; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:03:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <478AA6DE.2080905@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 01:03:42 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christian Baer References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Changing the output of uname -m or -p X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:03:45 -0000 Christian Baer wrote: > Hello Folks! > > This may be a bit of a hacker's question, but I'll just go for it in here > - at least for starters. > > I want to play a prank on a friend of mine. He does a csup at least once a > day and also makes a new world at least once a day. He is pretty nutty > about that which is ok for some -CURRENT system, but he also does that on > production systems. > > Now I don't want to judge him about that, but he is a bit sensitive about > the output of uname. The version is very important to him. :-) > > The prank I want to pull is to somehow change the output of uname -m to > read something different. The best thing would be to change that to > something ancient like C-64, i286, i8086. Or, if only plattforms that > FreeBSD supports are allowed, then mips, alpha or sparc64 on an i386. That > should keep him thinking for a while. :-) > > I don't want to do any damage, so I just want to screw up the output of > uname and the system should work normally apart from that. I realise that > I may have to change some of the OS's code and that's not a problem. I > just don't know where to look for this kind of thing and I don't really > want to do too much reading just for a little prank. > > This guy is a really good friend of mine but sometimes get up my neck > because I am much more conservative about updating my production systems. > As you can see on this machine, I go along the lines of RELENG_6_2 which > he can't understand. This should buy me a little peace and quite for a > week or two. Getting access to his machines is no problem as I am often at > his place. > > Can this even be done and if so how? See the manpage, and the UNAME_* variables. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 00:22:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0238816A418 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:22:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net) Received: from dd17730.kasserver.com (dd17730.kasserver.com [85.13.138.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B642113C43E for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:22:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net) Received: from nermal.rz1.convenimus.net (sub87-230-112-211.he-dsl.de [87.230.112.211]) by dd17730.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F9BB18843D6D for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 01:22:30 +0100 (CET) Received: by nermal.rz1.convenimus.net (Postfix, from userid 8) id 77D2315217; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:49:59 +0100 (CET) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Path: not-for-mail From: Christian Baer Newsgroups: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:49:59 +0100 (CET) Organization: Convenimus Projekt Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <478AA6DE.2080905@FreeBSD.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: sunny.rz1.convenimus.net X-Trace: nermal.rz1.convenimus.net 1200268199 29850 192.168.100.5 (13 Jan 2008 23:49:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@convenimus.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:49:59 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD/6.2-RELEASE-p8 (sparc64)) Subject: Re: Changing the output of uname -m or -p X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:22:30 -0000 On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 01:03:42 +0100 Kris Kennaway wrote: >> Can this even be done and if so how? > See the manpage, and the UNAME_* variables. I already did that once and it didn't work out. I just found the reason: I'm too thick. :-/ I though all the letters had to be capitals, so I set UNAME_M instead of UNAME_m. The days my brain leaves me... :-) Thanks for the help! Regards, Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 02:24:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69E2016A418 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 02:24:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LukeD@pobox.com) Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com [208.72.237.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D06B13C447 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 02:24:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LukeD@pobox.com) Received: from a-sasl-quonix (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2455E217F for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:05:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from lukas.is-a-geek.org (pool-71-113-98-97.sttlwa.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.113.98.97]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2942217E for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:05:27 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:05:23 -0800 (PST) From: Luke Dean X-X-Sender: lukas@border.lukas.is-a-geek.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080113175319.K1468@border.lukas.is-a-geek.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: RAID mirror really worked X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Luke Dean List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 02:24:07 -0000 This isn't really a question, just a testimonial and a thank you to the people who make this work. I've got a Promise TX2300 SATA Raid controller that I use on my FreeBSD fileserver at home. It uses ataraid. I've set up a simple two-drive mirror. One of the drives has been sending me intermittent failure messages in the nightly emails for nearly a year - no more than one or two a month. Last night it finally croaked. The mirror broke, but it went into "degraded" mode and kept right on chugging along with no service interruption. Today I took down the system, replaced the bad drive, rebuilt the array using Promise's BIOS tools (since that's how I built it originally), and everything is back to normal. This was my first real drive failure with an inexpensive RAID card, and I'd always wondered if they could ease the pain of a hard drive failure. It looks like they can. I should add that before this, on another system, I had a RAID controller failure. A controller failure is a completely different scenario... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 02:40:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D215B16A468 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 02:40:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from osastw3@yahoo.com) Received: from web63409.mail.re1.yahoo.com (web63409.mail.re1.yahoo.com [69.147.97.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 86C7E13C44B for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 02:40:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from osastw3@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 67548 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Jan 2008 02:14:12 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=GvEanJb25T0hwS0aBEzUFmNoPJ8+Gob79pNGGZh9HNwTqyKEH9ZxsYc06dsVqdHWnPHkZHQPl+UzY6kKsIkpAcjJTwJ1LDeJ7CywWcr1TQBe2NJsciKDFLZa+hcbs5sAmVrYwcncuRxkEWGnGidUaH3L2metMVQsJvRBx91mfFA=; X-YMail-OSG: 2jmo0VEVM1lwT63lUWrLR9WlIMS6a93iclmWYGomykmorMQhXyYFOmKHvlN0rl78cNcx1tO09ptGe98shBxZaWeYnjKRtRaqtk67oqJkCV.lnu7.jDv3vNiAtni1uA-- Received: from [24.88.100.27] by web63409.mail.re1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:14:12 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/818.31 YahooMailWebService/0.7.160 Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:14:12 -0800 (PST) From: Oscar Delay To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <627653.65153.qm@web63409.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Missing /dev entries on SCSI drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 02:40:54 -0000 Hi, I've a disk partition on an old system which I cannot mount because the device entry under /dev is missing. This is a mostly unused machine that hasn't been backed up in a while but I'd like to recover the partition if possible. The SCSI adaptor is an Adaptec 2940U2W, the only device entries in /dev related to the drive are da0 and da0s1. The major,minor device numbers are 0,93 for da0 and 0,94 for da0s1. What would my mknod arguments be for da0s1d. It's a 6.1 release box. Thanks for any help. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 02:43:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C142216A4C0 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 02:43:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from modulok@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D41D13C4F7 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 02:43:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from modulok@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so1012133wxd.7 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:43:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=JtCRtQoQewbtrCea2u9GldRlZ9HrK8EcWl9miPPEwNM=; b=HLjsmj8PGgNGquYavNa7g/82AsB/8K2QU/v+6dQFNCW6XryjIe25CAxO3Qvc0nRGFty45lL+zMen4XICzPA191296t1sHWS33M7vLsY33tMaymlvlCq5zKoYfA5YHHTQy6u28lDjnAV03mmkLNGsEHeJakBvk+ODGriS6YyyXh0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=dbiOws34q2H+eDYySgzeArYNIXKK0jkQTUfUHbqOy4DbGg5V2OvxmnQGAnvmLz0lnqst3JlX/sni0FnCpZoVeG8kVyw2u22/RkUhYlV7dU62jxclHj5WqcWsS988te6O7RN+unu+1H1qUlvD84i+R4EBVdLyI123b3olFao3s7I= Received: by 10.70.135.3 with SMTP id i3mr4085506wxd.36.1200278591522; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:43:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.50.8 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:43:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <64c038660801131843x6ebd405bi9b75f1232371b604@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 19:43:11 -0700 From: Modulok To: "Wojciech Puchar" In-Reply-To: <20080113213851.S1458@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <64c038660801040516u5c42a6cpadb475ad67fb4730@mail.gmail.com> <47804901.6090007@gmail.com> <4786BF45.8030602@monkeybrains.net> <4786CEDC.3050009@chuckr.org> <20080111170711.t6wxj1bc68cgwwk4@webmail.leidinger.net> <4787E597.9040902@chuckr.org> <20080112213747.443a4833@deskjail> <20080113082515.19316v8x3pbs3tcs@intranet.encontacto.net> <20080113095341.4e34f42e@scorpio> <20080113213851.S1458@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Another question based on: Re: HOW-TO get Flash7 working! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 02:43:12 -0000 > > Unfortunately, the poor support for Flash, as well as other common web > > features under FBSD, is a prime reason that I continue to keep my WinXP > > or - like me, you may simply don't use it. ... > if others require flash7, java or other craps, they just don't want me to > be their client. ... I cannot express the extent of my loathing for Flash (and JavaScript). Unfortunately, as has been stated, many businesses employ such evils. In some cases it is nice to tell them to piss off, in others that is beyond the realm of possibility. -Modulok- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 03:37:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38FB216A418 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 03:37:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F68D13C455 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 03:37:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) id m0E3bATD017917; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:37:10 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:37:09 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Oscar Delay Message-ID: <20080114033709.GC97708@dan.emsphone.com> References: <627653.65153.qm@web63409.mail.re1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <627653.65153.qm@web63409.mail.re1.yahoo.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Missing /dev entries on SCSI drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 03:37:12 -0000 In the last episode (Jan 13), Oscar Delay said: > I've a disk partition on an old system which I cannot mount because > the device entry under /dev is missing. This is a mostly unused > machine that hasn't been backed up in a while but I'd like to recover > the partition if possible. The SCSI adaptor is an Adaptec 2940U2W, > the only device entries in /dev related to the drive are da0 and > da0s1. > > The major,minor device numbers are 0,93 for da0 and 0,94 for da0s1. > What would my mknod arguments be for da0s1d. It's a 6.1 release box. 6.x uses devfs and GEOM, which means that device nodes are automatically created based on the existence of partition and disklalbel data on disk. Minor numbers are allocated dynamically every time disks are probed, so manually creating a devoce node with mknod would be useless. If there is a da0s1 but no da0s1d, then the disklabel header on da0s1 must be damaged or missing. If you remember the layout, you can run disklabel and recreate it. Another option is to use the sysutils/scan_ffs or sysutils/ffs2recov ports to determine the original disklabel settings. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 04:35:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E8FB16A418 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:35:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4B913C4F4 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:35:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.182]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2736B11FDCFA; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:35:02 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 69699-10; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:35:01 -0400 (AST) Received: from fserv.hub.org (blk-7-245-234.eastlink.ca [71.7.245.234]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757F811FDCE4; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:35:01 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [192.168.1.2]) by fserv.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA0B78CD17; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:34:59 -0400 (AST) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:34:24 -0400 From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <18CC5A4A2AC36D7FF57615EE@ganymede.hub.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: AFS ... or equivalent ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:35:04 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi ... I recently started working for a company that is using AFS to mirror their data between various data centers, in the US, Asia and the EU ... the idea is that the several thousand servers that are being run have access to identical information .. Now, depressingly enough, it looks like OpenAFS works on everything *but* BSD ... :( IBM AFS for AIX, Version 3.6 IBM AFS for Digital Unix, Version 3.6 IBM AFS for HP-UX, Version 3.6 IBM AFS for Linux, Version 3.6 IBM AFS for SGI IRIX, Version 3.6 IBM AFS for Solaris, Version 3.6 Does anyone know if there is any serious work being done to get AFS working under FreeBSD? I have a large project that I'm working on that AFS (or something equivalent) would be *very* useful for, but we're trying to keep it as FreeBSD-pure as possible ... Thoughts? Pointers? - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHiuZQ4QvfyHIvDvMRAlRMAJ9mcK6kOCdkudVlTFzzoPuAqgMOWQCfTY9k QRN/4A2GvUni6jNsDX8Du/U= =Mtrv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 05:44:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9171E16A419 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 05:44:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from gaia.nimnet.asn.au (nimbin.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.45.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EBC413C4EF for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 05:44:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (smithi@localhost) by gaia.nimnet.asn.au (8.8.8/8.8.8R1.5) with SMTP id QAA27738; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:44:37 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:44:36 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: RW In-Reply-To: <20080114043515.577E016A4CF@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Dead Line Subject: Re: ports download speed! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 05:44:52 -0000 On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:26:45 +0000 RW wrote: > On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:59:04 +0000 > Dead Line wrote: > > > > > Hello People.. > > > > I recently have noticed something! > > Im installing FreeBSD 6.2R fresh install, When im downloading > > anything using the ports, The download speed appear as it is 33 K or > > 32 K! In fact im on DSL 512 K. > > Im a missing something silly here? is it the actual download > > speed ? or the estimated? or? > > 32kBytes/s * 8bits/Bytes = 256kbit/s > > You are getting 50% of your nominal speed, that's not particularly > unusual. Actually if you figure at 10 bits/byte you'll get a much closer estimate of true maximum speed. On a 512kbps link you'll rarely see more than ~ 51.2Kbytes/s even on download tests, similarly ~150Kbytes/s @ 1500kbps. So 33Kbytes/s is closer to 64% of maximum, and as you say is not unusual on a heavily loaded site, or over international links. K being 1024, of course, which is what fetch reports, with k (bps, bits/s) being 1000. cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 06:32:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7B0116A419 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 06:32:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.4.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC90013C447 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 06:32:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from flosoft.no-ip.biz (ool-435559b8.dyn.optonline.net [67.85.89.184]) by mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTP id <0JUM00HU5FHRHDF0@mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 01:32:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from flosoft.no-ip.biz (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by flosoft.no-ip.biz (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0E6WET6047350; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 01:32:14 -0500 Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 01:32:14 -0500 From: "Aryeh M. Friedman" In-reply-to: <20080113234745.A1368@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Wojciech Puchar Message-id: <478B01EE.20202@gmail.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 References: <20080113234745.A1368@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080104) Cc: Alden Pease , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Realtek RTL8139 Family Fast Eithernet Adapter Plugin X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 06:32:17 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Wojciech Puchar wrote: > adapter plugin? what do you mean. > > rtl8139 driver works fine in 6.* and 7.* If he is on 6.2 and talking about random dropouts/hangs all he needs to do is add -txcsum (and -rxcsum is paranoid) the ifconfig args... if he is talking about slowly decaying performence in 6.3, 7.x or current there is an yet to be committed patch (do a search for it) by Pyun for this - -- Aryeh M. Friedman FloSoft Systems, Java Developer Tools. http://www.flosoft-systems.com Developer, not business, friendly. "Free software != Free beer" Blog: http://www.flosoft-systems.com/flosoft_systems_community/blogs/aryeh/index.php -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHiwHujRvRjGmHRgQRAtabAKCijAmIuVMCycmXucCb5WM36SDukACfZI0M dAH2NADZ8KS05ygXNSfq65E= =/18K -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 06:50:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF33116A46B for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 06:50:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D3C13C43E for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 06:50:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0E6mIYF001306; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:48:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0E6m9QD001303; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:48:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:48:09 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Luke Dean In-Reply-To: <20080113175319.K1468@border.lukas.is-a-geek.org> Message-ID: <20080114074736.L1166@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20080113175319.K1468@border.lukas.is-a-geek.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RAID mirror really worked X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 06:50:40 -0000 > > I've got a Promise TX2300 SATA Raid controller that I use on my FreeBSD > fileserver at home. It uses ataraid. I've set up a simple two-drive mirror. > One of the drives has been sending me intermittent failure messages in the > nightly emails for nearly a year - no more than one or two a month. Last > night it finally croaked. The mirror broke, but it went into "degraded" mode > and kept right on chugging along with no service interruption. > Today I took down the system, replaced the bad drive, rebuilt the array using > Promise's BIOS tools (since that's how I built it originally), and everything > is back to normal. gmirror works too very good without any hardware :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 07:28:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CBC016A417 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:28:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gergely.czuczy@harmless.hu) Received: from marvin.harmless.hu (marvin.harmless.hu [195.56.55.204]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAF9E13C457 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:27:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gergely.czuczy@harmless.hu) Received: from localhost (marvin-mail [192.168.0.2]) by marvin.harmless.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEE717C0C25; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:03:48 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.4.2 (20060627) (Debian) at harmless.hu Received: from marvin.harmless.hu ([192.168.0.2]) by localhost (marvin.harmless.hu [192.168.0.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 580Fqtm2iOUC; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:03:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from marvin.harmless.hu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by marvin.harmless.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 520E17C0AF6; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:03:46 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:03:46 +0100 From: Gergely CZUCZY To: "Marc G. Fournier" Message-ID: <20080114070346.GA97105@harmless.hu> References: <18CC5A4A2AC36D7FF57615EE@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=x-unknown; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18CC5A4A2AC36D7FF57615EE@ganymede.hub.org> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AFS ... or equivalent ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:28:00 -0000 --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, Check out coda, it's also a distributed filesystem, and has an updated kernel module in 7-STABLE. The bits in 6.x are out-of-date, but it will be back in business from 7. On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 12:34:24AM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 >=20 >=20 > Hi ... >=20 > I recently started working for a company that is using AFS to mirror th= eir=20 > data between various data centers, in the US, Asia and the EU ... the ide= a is=20 > that the several thousand servers that are being run have access to ident= ical=20 > information .. >=20 > Now, depressingly enough, it looks like OpenAFS works on everything *bu= t* BSD=20 > ... :( >=20 > IBM AFS for AIX, Version 3.6 > IBM AFS for Digital Unix, Version 3.6 > IBM AFS for HP-UX, Version 3.6 > IBM AFS for Linux, Version 3.6 > IBM AFS for SGI IRIX, Version 3.6 > IBM AFS for Solaris, Version 3.6 >=20 > Does anyone know if there is any serious work being done to get AFS wor= king=20 > under FreeBSD? I have a large project that I'm working on that AFS (or= =20 > something equivalent) would be *very* useful for, but we're trying to kee= p it=20 > as FreeBSD-pure as possible ... >=20 > Thoughts? Pointers? >=20 > - ---- > Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.or= g) > Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org > Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) >=20 > iD8DBQFHiuZQ4QvfyHIvDvMRAlRMAJ9mcK6kOCdkudVlTFzzoPuAqgMOWQCfTY9k > QRN/4A2GvUni6jNsDX8Du/U=3D > =3DMtrv > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 Sincerely, Gergely Czuczy mailto: gergely.czuczy@harmless.hu --=20 Weenies test. Geniuses solve problems that arise. --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) owGVVk9vG0UUD62QYCWQekagp16apt71nzh2YuSmTuzYLrUTxzZtQQLN7o7tqXdn NjOzdh3uCLUcEEc40A9QJJD4CJyRuPEl4NoDF97s2kloKyL2sNqZee/33vu9P7Pf vHN17cq133765dNbX3/7/Rs/vvWdmwljrfnYDomcMW7nc7m8vVPO57bs/JZdzhUL ReqWN0clsuOVys2nb/f2BdeUa3uwiGgFNH2ss1FAGP8QvAmRiupqrEf2trWSqzMV CcU0E7wCjAeM07OzgSRcjai0G9wTPuPjCpzEQlPfjiTjmrgBtawWDQKRsaz9CfWm IGINKEsywPQNBSRQAgj4TGnJ3BhVYcQCqhZK0zADhPswISjGIY58gsfWlEpOAwiF HwcUHYKy3R/U9u41HBhMKLhMK7Nbch4DkdTYs8XINroZQANoFuYsCCwXZQk6hLJu rDAqpWAkRQhlx7IOOXQEz8BdNJwvZqCQy20D0ZAvVDaLlUKx1gE7V8zlMtAh0oOm AwcilpxRCXOJBFSs22CbZ6/RbHfhqHkE/Xaz26hDp9Hv15qN5BCFWkRNKtBv1fLW 7Woht3xBi4HjOKsVQBsk9ZDxYAFKE2lomgs5RcZhJCQS6IkwInwBeoJeMgUmojHU DvqgBYRMSpTSk6pFmUwxkRACLtVzSjnMiGQiVummsUOlyhhmNDI67GegphhJkmE2 GkPjXPLJfFq1CBpMQRPrZl/RGZUkwG+ENXqKStxRqYTJi0uNgzLmmN8ZBeJ5JgHo LEJyXbWYR4IUlHEMMSSmAOEiJ10xz4BPI4mKiIXUUC7i8cRUFgRCTBUEbErhMKLc EGEIU4AgxreFnhj7G25ctfQG7PXrKawJrLJ+bgSp3+skPBqea+0HGfgY4zC+bDql 14jU2ZhpjHzI2ePLZFtH9vBSwHuMx5ci9ZttaB9f7l1fBJhq9ZLYKti6oKbVFoJT mHIxBzYy2cRssWTfZDGpE0PlMoO+Eca0jamGJctVyxRmChpzH3viQFKKFO+aQk7T DejHmEIkxSPq6bQs2jfCs6oWPN0zkOsGMoVTIqRp5uhJzGYkwFq5iUpx4KM/sGEy u4HFT0dxYAJOW35Ob2AMWi6MIvo6pVi1EZZJCorzZemgHcUoiGuceIrh9Pp3Fw4m pr60wjiOBEu6ZHd1asOyo18ZCOdPK3adQzmGLrbdMs4+9gXD0of1idZRJZudz+fO BOVMzOObiNcICQvAAeVJEkWLO+nhGP7z6fS7r6og2EMyEQJPFsujl9T60+RSeMlE e7+HKuVSfqtUKr5+sNUGw+OzmbasrQo0eXzUhFnByTlFWF9yfHPFGKtv1/d6By0W f9Ir9majRas9q886x7XguFO7uxN6H5Wmh/v+NPY/DgYHp6fiKK6djDuH93v7o8HD nSlC9I672WKt0Jxht5UedVX9wXY9zg6rm3U8xHdHy9nK4Ua3/lp3U2c+/38Paoww HFf59kjdWX4mnJlsmcQGeKOh1DKrZqWcC3JZIxcSnpyYCZc9x0O1gcDOUbGLaWIu XlyK4gw1HZgUA5bw9XNx+4LkRVeup7FZfcY97OFggXdwk2LX4aTcP42904Vl0LSo YPMm246XbN/B/4AQ72CFhWhZtm1Q7uM1wbBMNVXagSYusMkU9mMwS7oYeyU8m+5M Ucf6avfqm2vmh2P1u3LtyuzJ2rNnlZ13P3v/51t/btZePCcbvwe/7j5a++Hkr+fv /T18sfXHWqb49IPn7Sf0iy//AQ== =zhAa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 07:35:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AC0D16A418 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:35:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from move@inbox.lv) Received: from shark3.inbox.lv (shark3.inbox.lv [89.111.3.83]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E15D813C468 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:35:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from move@inbox.lv) Received: by shark3.inbox.lv (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7B11545BC; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:35:41 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost (w19 [10.0.1.29]) by shark3-plain-b64d2.inbox.lv (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4694A3DB1 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:35:41 +0200 (EET) Received: from 159.148.227.140 ( [159.148.227.140]) as user move@10.0.1.1 by www.inbox.lv with HTTP; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:35:41 +0200 X-LOCAL: 1 X-Compose: web=www.inbox.lv, node=w19, l=lv, prefs=HTML, sess=unset, fck=Compatible, compose=HTML X-REMOTE-ADDR: 159.148.227.140 X-HTTP-USER-AGENT: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071127 Firefox/2.0.0.11 Message-ID: <1200296141.478b10cd53c0f@www.inbox.lv> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:35:41 +0200 From: Matiss To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: inbox.lv Webmail X-Cyrus-Size: 2774 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Which environment variable? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:35:43 -0000 Is there such environment variable, which changes window title for=0Aputty?= I mean, MC is able to change it to working dir I think.. How=0Ado I change= that title to let's say server name for my shell?=0A=0AThanks :)=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 07:42:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6312816A41A for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:42:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christopher.illies@ki.se) Received: from smtp2.ki.se (smtp2.ki.se [130.237.98.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C44E13C45B for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:42:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christopher.illies@ki.se) Received: from smtp2.ki.se (smtp2.ki.se [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id A8AF7534B22 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:12:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from Klabautermann.ks.se (unknown [136.155.136.187]) by smtp2.ki.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71AF6534B9E for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:12:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from Klabautermann.ks.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Klabautermann.ks.se (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0E7CpfQ030361 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:12:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from chris@Klabautermann.ks.se) Received: (from chris@localhost) by Klabautermann.ks.se (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m0E7Cpms030360 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:12:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from chris) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:12:51 +0100 From: Christopher Illies To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080114071251.GA11712@Klabautermann.ks.se> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704, Antispam-Engine: 2.6.0.325393, Antispam-Data: 2008.1.13.225748 X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='BODY_SIZE_300_399 0, __CD 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Reinterpret gamepad input as keyboeard input X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:42:43 -0000 I have a gamepad and would like to make certain gamepad actions to be seen as regular keyboard input. Is this possible? I tried out usbhidaction with something like: Generic_Desktop:Game_Pad.Button:Button_1 1 1 /bin/echo -n ls Obviously, this approach does not work as I hoped. "ls" is echoed in a shell window, but it is not interpreted as input. Christopher From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 08:53:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF9516A420 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:53:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from wmail.teledomenet.gr (wmail.teledomenet.gr [213.142.128.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01AC113C45A for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:53:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: by wmail.teledomenet.gr (Postfix, from userid 1002) id CBF881C8093; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:53:20 +0200 (EET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on wmail.teledomenet.gr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.7-deb Received: from iris (unknown [192.168.1.71]) by wmail.teledomenet.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C0F1C8093; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:53:16 +0200 (EET) From: Nikos Vassiliadis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:53:04 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <1200296141.478b10cd53c0f@www.inbox.lv> In-Reply-To: <1200296141.478b10cd53c0f@www.inbox.lv> X-NCC-RegID: gr.telehouse MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801141053.05543.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Cc: Matiss Subject: Re: Which environment variable? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:53:22 -0000 On Monday 14 January 2008 09:35:41 Matiss wrote: > Is there such environment variable, which changes window title for > putty? No there is no such variable, that I am aware of. You just have to send some control characters to the terminal to change its title. How to send these characters really depends on your shell. > How do I change that title to let's say server name for my shell? You could use something like this in your ~/.bash_profile if you use bash. echo -en "\033]0;`hostname`\007" The above sends: 1) ASCII \033 2) ] 3) 0 4) ; 5) the_hostname 6) ASCII \007 The idea is that you should initiliaze the xterm's title at login time. Check the page below for your favorite shell. There are even two workaround in Perl and C in case your shell has no easy way to send the control characters. http://tldp.org/HOWTO/text/Xterm-Title HTH, Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 10:29:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B23AA16A468 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:29:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dread@aceweb.com) Received: from smtp107.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp107.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.206]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7086613C457 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:29:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dread@aceweb.com) Received: (qmail 79913 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2008 10:02:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (donread@sbcglobal.net@68.92.118.237 with login) by smtp107.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Jan 2008 10:02:37 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: W0U1HDUVM1mJl4UlpqQEk8OcKeIIE6pPcYMzF7Wdr1tN5LiS7E3O5gavnNd3sb1Il2.HeadjKg-- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:02:35 +0000 From: Don Read To: Matiss Message-ID: <20080114100235.1be0efa3@aceweb.com> In-Reply-To: <1200296141.478b10cd53c0f@www.inbox.lv> References: <1200296141.478b10cd53c0f@www.inbox.lv> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.5; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which environment variable? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:29:19 -0000 On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:35:41 +0200 Matiss said: > Is there such environment variable, which changes window title for > putty? I mean, MC is able to change it to working dir I think.. How > do I change that title to let's say server name for my shell? > > Thanks :) man xprop Or for the terminally lazy, cat xtitle #!/bin/sh # # gets/sets xterm title # me=`basename $0` usage="Usage : $me [pwd | new title ... ] ('pwd' sets it to the current directory)"; Adjective='Current' while [ $# -gt 0 ] do case "$1" in --help | -help | -h | -\?) echo; echo $usage; exit 0;; -*) echo "$me: Unrecognized switch: $1 ($me -help to show valid options)"; exit 1;; pwd) Adjective='New'; Title=`pwd`;; *) Adjective='New'; Title=$1; while [ $# -gt 1 ] do shift;Title="$Title $1"; done;; esac shift done if [ -n "$Title" ] then xprop -id $WINDOWID -set WM_NAME "$Title"; fi Title=`xprop -id $WINDOWID | grep WM_NAME | cut -d= -f2` echo $Adjective 'title :' $Title exit 0 -- Don Read dread@aceweb.com -- It's always darkest before the dawn. So if you are going to steal the neighbor's newspaper, that's the time to do it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 11:43:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 105A416A419 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:43:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net) Received: from dd17730.kasserver.com (dd17730.kasserver.com [85.13.138.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D441E13C47E for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:43:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net) Received: from nermal.rz1.convenimus.net (sub87-230-112-53.he-dsl.de [87.230.112.53]) by dd17730.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0A4518703FB7 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:43:44 +0100 (CET) Received: by nermal.rz1.convenimus.net (Postfix, from userid 8) id 3751415217; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:11:07 +0100 (CET) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Path: not-for-mail From: Christian Baer Newsgroups: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:11:07 +0100 (CET) Organization: Convenimus Projekt Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: <478AA6DE.2080905@FreeBSD.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: sunny.rz1.convenimus.net X-Trace: nermal.rz1.convenimus.net 1200309067 32851 192.168.100.5 (14 Jan 2008 11:11:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@convenimus.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:11:07 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD/6.2-RELEASE-p8 (sparc64)) Subject: Re: Changing the output of uname -m or -p X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:43:46 -0000 On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 01:03:42 +0100 Kris Kennaway wrote: >> Can this even be done and if so how? > See the manpage, and the UNAME_* variables. One other thing: Will that change the way the system reacts in any way? Apps should run normally (well, a browser may give a wrong plattform information but that should be it). But what happens if you try to compile something? Will a wrong plattform or CPU variable screw up what the compiler spits out? Could be rather unhealthy if the compiler optimizes code for a sun4u on an i386. :-) Regards, Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 11:44:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E299616A548 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:44:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net) Received: from dd17730.kasserver.com (dd17730.kasserver.com [85.13.138.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B032313C45A for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:44:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net) Received: from nermal.rz1.convenimus.net (sub87-230-112-53.he-dsl.de [87.230.112.53]) by dd17730.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61425187081A8 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:44:41 +0100 (CET) Received: by nermal.rz1.convenimus.net (Postfix, from userid 8) id 3E81615217; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:12:04 +0100 (CET) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Path: not-for-mail From: Christian Baer Newsgroups: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:12:04 +0100 (CET) Organization: Convenimus Projekt Lines: 8 Message-ID: References: <20080113175319.K1468@border.lukas.is-a-geek.org> <20080114074736.L1166@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> NNTP-Posting-Host: sunny.rz1.convenimus.net X-Trace: nermal.rz1.convenimus.net 1200309124 32851 192.168.100.5 (14 Jan 2008 11:12:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@convenimus.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:12:04 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD/6.2-RELEASE-p8 (sparc64)) Subject: Re: RAID mirror really worked X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:44:42 -0000 On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:48:09 +0100 (CET) Wojciech Puchar wrote: > gmirror works too very good without any hardware :) Yes, but a hardware RAID works without the OS having to know about it. :-) Regards, Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 05:44:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D64116A417 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 05:44:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from mx1.highperformance.net (dsl081-163-122.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.163.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D862813C448 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 05:44:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from w16.stradamotorsports.com (w16.stradamotorsports.com [192.168.1.16]) by mx1.highperformance.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0E5iSSX021665; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:44:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Message-ID: <478AF6BC.8050604@highperformance.net> Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:44:28 -0800 From: "Jason C. Wells" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Marc G. Fournier" , rees@umich.edu, openafs-devel@openafs.org, freebsd-afs@freebsd.org, port-freebsd@openafs.org References: <18CC5A4A2AC36D7FF57615EE@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <18CC5A4A2AC36D7FF57615EE@ganymede.hub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=2.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=failed version=3.1.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.6 (2006-10-03) on s4.stradamotorsports.com X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:14:07 +0000 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, rra@stanford.edu, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, matt@linuxbox.com Subject: Re: AFS ... or equivalent ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 05:44:35 -0000 Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > Does anyone know if there is any serious work being done to get AFS working > under FreeBSD? I have a large project that I'm working on that AFS (or > something equivalent) would be *very* useful for, but we're trying to keep it > as FreeBSD-pure as possible ... Yes. Please get in touch with any of the people CC'ed in this list. I believe Matt Benjamin is the one who is actually getting serious on this project. Patches were even mentioned in a recent email. I recall Jim Rees is knowledgeable on AFS. I also think one Derrick J. Brashear was interested/knowledgeable too, but I don't have his address handy. If I misrepesented anyone please feel free to correct me. Matt, if you do not know Marc, look up Postgresql. Marc is the port maintainer for postgresql as well as a postgres developer. (iirc) Me, I am just a user who put together an ugly, ugly little FreeBSD port a long time ago in the hope that it would inspire some people who were qualified to do real work to pick it up and run with it. There are a couple mailing lists suitable for FreeBSD porting discussions. One is run by the OpenAFS people and the other is run by FreeBSD people. Sorry for the spam and cross posts. It seems like the interest in OpenAFS on FreeBSD is building. I hope that this message will put the right people in touch with each other and that maybe a concerted effort to port OpenAFS to FreeBSD will arise. Later, Jason From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 12:17:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18DDD16A417 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:17:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net) Received: from dd17730.kasserver.com (dd17730.kasserver.com [85.13.138.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF5AB13C44B for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:17:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net) Received: from nermal.rz1.convenimus.net (sub87-230-112-53.he-dsl.de [87.230.112.53]) by dd17730.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94DD11866B8A7 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:17:02 +0100 (CET) Received: by nermal.rz1.convenimus.net (Postfix, from userid 8) id B035315217; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:44:24 +0100 (CET) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Path: not-for-mail From: Christian Baer Newsgroups: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:44:24 +0100 (CET) Organization: Convenimus Projekt Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: <20080114071251.GA11712@Klabautermann.ks.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: sunny.rz1.convenimus.net X-Trace: nermal.rz1.convenimus.net 1200311064 32851 192.168.100.5 (14 Jan 2008 11:44:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@convenimus.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:44:24 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD/6.2-RELEASE-p8 (sparc64)) Subject: Re: Reinterpret gamepad input as keyboeard input X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:17:03 -0000 On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:12:51 +0100 Christopher Illies wrote: > I tried out usbhidaction with something like: > Generic_Desktop:Game_Pad.Button:Button_1 1 1 /bin/echo -n ls > > Obviously, this approach does not work as I hoped. "ls" is echoed in a > shell window, but it is not interpreted as input. Then use the command directly: /bin/sh -c ls Regards, Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 12:35:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E7816A41A for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:35:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from susanthoffline@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.245]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F6413C47E for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:35:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from susanthoffline@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so538797anc.13 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:35:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:x-google-sender-auth; bh=6JAYrOlu8KJ0+ULDSVusj0l1Alc9+CE3mwdq+oPVT0E=; b=FAEde8bEKT6b+NKJOtyV1TcRPLdFJTHZEBlrIqbMX8f1EeLe5LZtn36YZlZIkJpNJ6HK+UQdhfrfP4PwYZtdxLKQUTU2sIE8+s69PrGopg4vnRc3AA00RMT1Q9p6FNeKYlq/Uy39R3z4RPxrFJZPoSbLJ0nBMdkBkFKEVqzuTk8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:x-google-sender-auth; b=PMRWVcmqgyIFWNF9EO10+pNny6gqYoU4Gg3Bmi8kWX5tfmYBVsflXCFGiVYu/FiSe3PZmIwAOJGyGsR4xIhJzVq/ggffOCfJ7RqLKLpoOQ2vvRGeS3aJJm93t2l/p8/yJkI2uWprISlGe+xYupTbouSKTykt2XwAE9eTKFRohJU= Received: by 10.100.247.14 with SMTP id u14mr13961661anh.79.1200314155557; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:35:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.6.10 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:35:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6faf55220801140435u12963e89k70531ae963542f64@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:05:55 +0530 From: "Susanth K" Sender: susanthoffline@gmail.com To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2919595b2a6cc7b8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Which is the Latest Clustering Tools for FreeBSD7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:35:56 -0000 Dear Friends, Am Interested to know more about the Latest Clustering tools available in FreeBSD 7.0 What am looking for is Load Balancing cluster + High Availability cluster Is SG Cluster Still active project ? [http://turtle.ee.ncku.edu.tw/sgcluster/ ] The Pico BSD mentioned in this page is very very old one. Features of SG Attracted me : { Manageable - It is very simple to install and a friendly web user interface is available to ease the administration. Single Image - It transparently clusters back-end servers running different platforms into a single system that appears as a single server to the client Scalable - The system service capacity can be increased by adding new servers to the cluster Load Balancing - It automatically routes incoming requests to the least loaded servers for optimal performance. Fault Tolerant - SG load balancer monitors the availability of back-end servers and only routes client's requests to those alive ones. More than one load balancers can be setup to avoid the single point of failure in the whole system. High Availability - SG cluster can mask the faults on load balancer or back-end servers if there are sufficient redundancies. It also keeps service available when doing system upgrad } But the package mentioned to setup is very very old. Any one having experience in Latest Clustering, please point me the Right URL. (Am very beginner) Applications am Willing to run in Very Large Scale are : Apache + PHP + MySQL + FastCGI + C++ Based Custom Web Based Application + PostgreSQL on Top of FreeBSD 7.0 Thanks in advance. -- // // Susanth K // // Knowledge is the only treasure that increase on sharing // From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 13:05:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB64816A468; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:05:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rees@citi.umich.edu) Received: from citi.umich.edu (unknown [IPv6:2001:468:e9c:3060::4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E0113C45D; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:05:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rees@citi.umich.edu) Received: from citi.umich.edu (dsl093-001-248.det1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.1.248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Jim Rees", Issuer "CITI Production KCA" (verified OK)) by citi.umich.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB914774; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:05:03 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:05:10 -0500 From: Jim Rees To: "Marc G. Fournier" Message-ID: <20080114130509.GA8223@citi.umich.edu> References: <18CC5A4A2AC36D7FF57615EE@ganymede.hub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18CC5A4A2AC36D7FF57615EE@ganymede.hub.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AFS ... or equivalent ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:05:05 -0000 The server runs on FreeBSD as far as I know. There is a client, and I think it still builds if you apply Matt's patches, which are in the OpenAFS bug tracking system. But it doesn't run. No one is actively maintaining the FreeBSD port. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 14:06:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40CF216A418 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:06:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jalmberg@identry.com) Received: from mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.4.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2080013C45A for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:06:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jalmberg@identry.com) Received: from [192.168.1.110] (ool-4b7f8e42.static.optonline.net [75.127.142.66]) by mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTP id <0JUN00CUW0ILUPS0@mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:06:21 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:06:20 -0500 From: John Almberg To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <87A9631B-EAC5-41B8-B4C2-001C3ADBA486@identry.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: No spam??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:06:22 -0000 Last week I set up a brand new mail server with a combination of pf/ spamassassin/maildrop for spam filtering... Everything seems to work great. All real mail seems to be getting through. I monitored the spamd and maildrop logs during the first few days to make sure my very conservative spam settings (spamd marks email that scored higher than 5 as spam, and maildrop drops spam that scores higher than 12) to make sure that real mail isn't getting dropped. At the beginning of the week, I was getting a few spam a day in my spam folder. What has me spooked is that this whole weekend I got exactly one spam in my spam folder (a false positive, in fact). This is down from around 500 that I normally get per day (which is why I was keen to get an up-to-date mailserver!) I know this is an odd thing to worry about, but is this normal? Since the spam doesn't even seem to be reaching spamd, I'm guessing that the real hero is pf, which must be blocking 99.99% of spam at the packet level. Is this normal? TIA: John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 14:56:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0F6516A41B for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:56:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from liettneff@bk.ru) Received: from cny.innet.yaroslavl.su (cny.innet.yaroslavl.su [217.15.134.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3318A13C43E for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:56:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from liettneff@bk.ru) Received: from tac.innet.yaroslavl.su (tac.innet.yaroslavl.su [217.15.135.68]) by cny.innet.yaroslavl.su (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id m0EEu9a43281; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:56:09 +0300 (MSK) Received: from reaper.yaroslavl.ru (reaper.yaroslavl.ru [85.113.202.195]) by tac.innet.yaroslavl.su (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id m0EEu6bP025741; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:56:06 +0300 (MSK) Received: from comp-reaper (comp-reaper [10.19.1.3]) by reaper.yaroslavl.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F5B32281E; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:56:06 +0300 (MSK) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:56:18 +0300 From: Michael Lednev X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.99.29) Professional Organization: none X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <33530618.20080114175618@bk.ru> To: Christian Baer In-Reply-To: References: <20080113175319.K1468@border.lukas.is-a-geek.org> <20080114074736.L1166@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RAID mirror really worked X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Michael Lednev List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:56:14 -0000 Hello, Christian. On 14 2008 ., 14:12:04 you wrote: CB> On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:48:09 +0100 (CET) Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> gmirror works too very good without any hardware :) CB> Yes, but a hardware RAID works without the OS having to know about it. :-) ...and its failures? ;) -- Best regards, Michael mailto:liettneff@bk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 15:20:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9173C16A419 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:20:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from closure@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B31413C44B for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:20:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from closure@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l15so2185184rvb.43 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:20:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=oQ/uHoMYnHGRqRiT4PPjmVNBgys3treW5OlBFbbuI5M=; b=RnbhY7+bIPbn4lLgLTtvydbf0F0QMjKXU1AhJc7WyytZ/xPdv24k/eHl0xGKczMj7hsrM8hANJchNPYycHuLGPaLntTbjKZurBxe3nne9LuuMyDxw29nGUNhBUjC+Km66FBPZdOOrbEut5dUaz+fZqZPJTrAWSHv0eshM90+6zo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=lySm0YBF/P4hOJcRmi3l7g3X9EVXG6B7ZduKFQPDXdedBXaXkdTeqHl6nqwf0eY3sbuo+ZnpEwD3+ah0ljC7nxB9324t54B1uvUVONhrE44FKeikt3GADDR0JBUoj8xgVl1PKeRNosN3YKnzsD16ZFnbbZSE9l8nXhniOgpjnLE= Received: by 10.140.161.11 with SMTP id j11mr3838879rve.134.1200322491008; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 06:54:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.28.3 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 06:54:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:54:50 +0000 From: jdta To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: pfctl on wireless interfaces X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:20:03 -0000 I'm running tests on a few congestion control schemes which use pfctl to activate the respective queue controller. This works fine on interfaces with a fixed capacity as altq sets up the respective queue taking the bandwidth into consideration. On wireless interfaces however this capacity varies over time. an so altq's use of the declared capacity is overly optimistic (in my case, 54Mbps). This results in pfctl not queueing packets until this capacity has been met: the packets are queued at the interface as pfctl has no indication of the varying signal level. Is there anyway of either extracting the queue level directly from the interface card or, alternatively, forcing altq to take into consideration the signal level at any given time? The first seems more plausible, but I'm not really sure if the second would have other uses (priority queueing etc). Thanks in advance. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 14:23:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26AA916A41B; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:23:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [209.31.154.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE2AE13C4DD; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:23:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 784FD46B51; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:23:47 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:23:47 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: "Jason C. Wells" In-Reply-To: <478AF6BC.8050604@highperformance.net> Message-ID: <20080114142124.Y55696@fledge.watson.org> References: <18CC5A4A2AC36D7FF57615EE@ganymede.hub.org> <478AF6BC.8050604@highperformance.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:22:04 +0000 Cc: rra@stanford.edu, rees@umich.edu, port-freebsd@openafs.org, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, matt@linuxbox.com, freebsd-afs@freebsd.org, "Marc G. Fournier" , openafs-devel@openafs.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AFS ... or equivalent ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:23:48 -0000 On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Jason C. Wells wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > >> Does anyone know if there is any serious work being done to get AFS working >> under FreeBSD? I have a large project that I'm working on that AFS (or >> something equivalent) would be *very* useful for, but we're trying to keep >> it as FreeBSD-pure as possible ... > > Yes. Please get in touch with any of the people CC'ed in this list. I > believe Matt Benjamin is the one who is actually getting serious on this > project. Patches were even mentioned in a recent email. I recall Jim Rees > is knowledgeable on AFS. I also think one Derrick J. Brashear was > interested/knowledgeable too, but I don't have his address handy. If I > misrepesented anyone please feel free to correct me. > > Matt, if you do not know Marc, look up Postgresql. Marc is the port > maintainer for postgresql as well as a postgres developer. (iirc) > > Me, I am just a user who put together an ugly, ugly little FreeBSD port a > long time ago in the hope that it would inspire some people who were > qualified to do real work to pick it up and run with it. > > There are a couple mailing lists suitable for FreeBSD porting discussions. > One is run by the OpenAFS people and the other is run by FreeBSD people. > > Sorry for the spam and cross posts. It seems like the interest in OpenAFS on > FreeBSD is building. I hope that this message will put the right people in > touch with each other and that maybe a concerted effort to port OpenAFS to > FreeBSD will arise. Arla, which is just an AFS client, runs on some versions of FreeBSD, although typically not really recent ones. I spent a little time this summer looking at getting it updated to 7, but ran out of time. I'd like very much to get at least the kernel parts of an AFS client into the base system, as otherwise any AFS port (be it Arla, OpenAFS, etc) will constantly be falling behind and breaking as the base tree moves forward. Our VFS tends to change with moderate speed, and having it in the base tree will allow it to be updated as part of regular changes to our KPI by the author of the changes, rather than watching more and more ifdefs appear in a third-party tree. I'm happy to lend a hand with this, but I don't have the time (apparently) to drive a port forward myself right now. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 15:55:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA98B16A41A for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:55:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.robillard@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66ABE13C4CC for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:55:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.robillard@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id l8so894545nzf.13 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:55:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=ymCy9OhwvuUQ1HcC/X3Il2q5o2SQjYTydX8MQZ1UINA=; b=mBUEyMnUshVkad3PxTHpZ/5whzYIlfJpIJAPTKnT07HW3n4CyiDYDVGv00KPA2zAubBErr+Bm1+vUEKntNFuxT39W7W0md4ZQ6assYe2rI/GemIiw3wBS02DXykDTy53NYWhs0gGBZldHJoJoTGm7wRNpLq8nHmcJ0Be3NZt95c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=M8bTpCQauuuhXezs82ahgikiU83F6/IvCDDzi0obubhPsNnFvF9HIRDR5dH95uMYR6hv61i8Z2vvwTf73K/XMbaBwQmMux+q3yH9VVyzTZUsxZk4s3XvrQi0HnvtV4WvnJUy/6npz+h9fwxSmLlA4f5IpoOsA3BjjD82utERzQI= Received: by 10.141.172.6 with SMTP id z6mr3891885rvo.80.1200326130732; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:55:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.186.16 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:55:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <226ae0c60801140755h154f0a96r1f50ab88a02a7193@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:55:30 -0500 From: "David Robillard" To: Albert.Shih@obspm.fr MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: How backup huge pgsql ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:55:32 -0000 > I want to known how can I make backup of huge postgresql database (huge mean ~ 2To). > > I can stop the access of the database during N>>1 hours. > > Any idea about this ? I came around this particular problem by setting up a read only mirror of an Oracle instance using Oracle DataGuard. Of course the product is Oracle-specific, but the idea should apply to PostgreSQL databases as well and it"s what we're in the process of installing here. The idea is to setup an identical but read-only copy of the production database on a seperate machine. This read-only copy is kept in sync with the production database using the various PostgreSQL High-Availability features (discussed here postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/high-availability.html) Such as a Master-Slave Replication or a Synchronous Multi-Master Replication. Say you're using a Master-Slave Replication. With this setup, you can stop the Master-Slave replication before running the backup on the read-only copy on the slave machine. This way you have a consistent view of your data while you backup and the production database is still online. Once your backup is over, you simply turn on the replication again to update your slave's data with what has changed on the master while the replication was offline. Simple and effective. Beware, you will take a performance hit when you turn replication on. What's more, since you now have a read-only database, you can use it in your pre-production and test environments without any impact on your production systems. HTH, David -- David Robillard UNIX systems administrator & Oracle DBA CISSP, RHCE & Sun Certified Security Administrator Montreal: +1 514 966 0122 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 16:05:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D5F16A417 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:05:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4DD13C455 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:05:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0EG2aY6002466; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:02:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0EG2Tot002463; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:02:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:02:29 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Michael Lednev In-Reply-To: <33530618.20080114175618@bk.ru> Message-ID: <20080114170016.N2442@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20080113175319.K1468@border.lukas.is-a-geek.org> <20080114074736.L1166@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <33530618.20080114175618@bk.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Christian Baer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RAID mirror really worked X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:05:23 -0000 >>> gmirror works too very good without any hardware :) > > CB> Yes, but a hardware RAID works without the OS having to know about it. :-) > > ...and its failures? ;) > :) for mirroring there is almost no CPU overhead so buying extra hardware doesn't make sense at all. not mentioning that most of such hardware are actually normal disk controllers with extra soft in BIOS. these are supported by ataraid driver. much better is to use gmirror so it will be completely portable. and - with gmirror you DO NOT have to mirror/stripe/concat whole drives. and that's what i do most often - mirror important data but store unimportant data without it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 16:13:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC7916A417; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:13:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Peter.Ross@alumni.tu-berlin.de) Received: from qsrv03ps.mx.bigpond.com (qsrv03ps.mx.bigpond.com [144.140.82.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 083CE13C467; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:13:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Peter.Ross@alumni.tu-berlin.de) Received: from oaamta05ps.mx.bigpond.com ([121.220.97.65]) by omta03ps.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20080114130255.CORG2997.omta03ps.mx.bigpond.com@oaamta05ps.mx.bigpond.com>; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:02:55 +0000 Received: from klein.bigpond.com ([121.220.97.65]) by oaamta05ps.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20080114130254.HSRZ14439.oaamta05ps.mx.bigpond.com@klein.bigpond.com>; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:02:54 +0000 Received: from klein.bigpond.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by klein.bigpond.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m0ED2fbF003213; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:02:41 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from Peter.Ross@alumni.tu-berlin.de) Received: from localhost (petros@localhost) by klein.bigpond.com (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) with ESMTP id m0ED2dup003210; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:02:41 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from Peter.Ross@alumni.tu-berlin.de) X-Authentication-Warning: klein.bigpond.com: petros owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:02:39 +1100 (EST) From: Peter Ross X-X-Sender: petros@klein.bigpond.com To: Susanth K In-Reply-To: <6faf55220801140435u12963e89k70531ae963542f64@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080114235230.A3145@klein.bigpond.com> References: <6faf55220801140435u12963e89k70531ae963542f64@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which is the Latest Clustering Tools for FreeBSD7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:13:15 -0000 Hi Susanth, On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Susanth K wrote: > Am Interested to know more about the Latest Clustering tools available in > FreeBSD 7.0 Me too;-) > Is SG Cluster Still active project ? [http://turtle.ee.ncku.edu.tw/sgcluster/ I don't know.. and have not used it. Sorry. > Applications am Willing to run in Very Large Scale are : > Apache + PHP + MySQL + FastCGI + C++ Based Custom Web Based Application + > PostgreSQL on Top of FreeBSD 7.0 At my work place we have (FreeBSD based) Juniper DXes as a frontend to Red Hat boxes. With "vanilla" FreeBSD I could think of CARP/VRRP and pf incl. pfsync for redundancy on packet layer and pound as a web frontend (does reverse proxy, loadbalancing and heart-beat to mark failed servers). I did this before. I never run MySQL and PostgreSQL clustered, just in master/slave replication mode. Clustering at my workplace is done using MS SQL. We start a bigger Drupal project I am keen to know what PostgreSQL and MySQL offer in this regard these days (the MS SQL support in Drupal is a bit dubious) Regards Peter From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 16:16:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99F3B16A468 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:16:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C05213C43E for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:16:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m0EGDokt077437; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:13:50 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m0EGDooZ077436; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:13:50 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:13:50 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: "Marc G. Fournier" Message-ID: <20080114161350.GA77355@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <18CC5A4A2AC36D7FF57615EE@ganymede.hub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18CC5A4A2AC36D7FF57615EE@ganymede.hub.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AFS ... or equivalent ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:16:01 -0000 On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 12:34:24AM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > Hi ... > I recently started working for a company that is using AFS to mirror their > data between various data centers, in the US, Asia and the EU ... the idea is > that the several thousand servers that are being run have access to identical > information .. > > Now, depressingly enough, it looks like OpenAFS works on everything *but* > BSD ... :( > > IBM AFS for AIX, Version 3.6 > IBM AFS for Digital Unix, Version 3.6 > IBM AFS for HP-UX, Version 3.6 > IBM AFS for Linux, Version 3.6 > IBM AFS for SGI IRIX, Version 3.6 > IBM AFS for Solaris, Version 3.6 > > Does anyone know if there is any serious work being done to get AFS working > under FreeBSD? I have a large project that I'm working on that AFS (or > something equivalent) would be *very* useful for, but we're trying to keep it > as FreeBSD-pure as possible ... Well, there is a client-only AFS project called Arla. I have been using it for about 1 1/2 years with no problem. But, it tends to be some versions behind in the FreeBSD it supports. Whoever supports it apparently doesn't have the time or other resources to keep up to the most recent FreeBSD versions. I have been told by persons who have done an AFS port here to a proprietary BSD based UNIX (but not any of the current free ones), that the difficuly part is the client and that the server is relatively easy to port. The reason being that the client has to reach deep in to the kernel, but the server does not - is pretty much sufficient unto itself. I know that one of the impediments in the past was the politics with the AFS group that was spun out of CMU, vs IBM vs some other interests and whose pocketbook was going to get gored all confounded with some claims for a newer, more wonderful thing called DFS which was supposed to obsolete AFS and also be integrated with a distrubuted queueing system, but which now seems like will never become real. But those issues are fairly ancient and mostly settled. OpenAFS seems to be the result and it runs well on the systems listed in the OP. So it would seem like folks could just ignore all that and move on to getting a good working OpenAFS port -- if only enough people could spare the resources for doing the necessary work. I would sure like to see both a good AFS client and an AFS server become well supported. OpenAFS has some new big technical issues to solve. Maybe having the smarts of FreeBSD contributing to the thinking, it would help those issues come to reasonable solutions too. ////jerry > > Thoughts? Pointers? > > - ---- > Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) > Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org > Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) > > iD8DBQFHiuZQ4QvfyHIvDvMRAlRMAJ9mcK6kOCdkudVlTFzzoPuAqgMOWQCfTY9k > QRN/4A2GvUni6jNsDX8Du/U= > =Mtrv > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 15:54:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D239B16A418; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:54:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from mx1.highperformance.net (dsl081-163-122.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.163.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 893B113C457; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:54:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from w16.stradamotorsports.com (w16.stradamotorsports.com [192.168.1.16]) by mx1.highperformance.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0EFsY2e024760; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:54:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Message-ID: <478B85BB.8000707@highperformance.net> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:54:35 -0800 From: "Jason C. Wells" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Watson References: <18CC5A4A2AC36D7FF57615EE@ganymede.hub.org> <478AF6BC.8050604@highperformance.net> <20080114142124.Y55696@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20080114142124.Y55696@fledge.watson.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=2.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=failed version=3.1.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.6 (2006-10-03) on s4.stradamotorsports.com X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:23:34 +0000 Cc: rra@stanford.edu, rees@umich.edu, port-freebsd@openafs.org, freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, matt@linuxbox.com, freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.org, "Marc G. Fournier" , openafs-devel@openafs.org, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: AFS ... or equivalent ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:54:46 -0000 For those of you who haven't seen this. Here is my rudimentary port. It is nothing more than the FreeBSD parts wrapped around the OpenAFS source. I think I was working on version 5 of FreeBSD but I don't recall for sure. This was version OpenAFS 1.4.2. It compiled. The kernel module loaded. I was able to get tokens using the system heimdal. I even got a directory listing via the client. Attempting to manipulate files resulted in an immediate panic. http://www.stradamotorsports.com/~jcw/openafs/ I would advise those who are interested to discuss and choose a mailing list for continuing the effort. We are currently writing four different lists in this thread. I'll test whatever you guys come up with. I'll be running FreeBSD-6.3 real soon now. Later, Jason From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 16:38:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A31D116A420 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:38:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lreid@cs.okstate.edu) Received: from a.cs.okstate.edu (a.cs.okstate.edu [139.78.113.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 653DA13C4E3 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:38:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lreid@cs.okstate.edu) Received: from [172.18.0.232] (showcase.tulsatech.com [70.168.226.150]) by a.cs.okstate.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C24E154CC7; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:08:09 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <478B885E.20505@cs.okstate.edu> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:05:50 -0600 From: Reid Linnemann User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070926) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rudy References: <64c038660801040516u5c42a6cpadb475ad67fb4730@mail.gmail.com> <20080104174955.52aa33fd@gumby.homeunix.com> <64c038660801041029t1a9662bayed3ca02fd46c7ece@mail.gmail.com> <64c038660801041226k1d350bc6p727e4666ea295727@mail.gmail.com> <477FFE14.1010704@monkeybrains.net> <477FFF63.50004@gmail.com> <47801D54.8050709@gmail.com> <47803E3F.2080005@monkeybrains.net> <47804901.6090007@gmail.com> <4786BF45.8030602@monkeybrains.net> In-Reply-To: <4786BF45.8030602@monkeybrains.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HOW-TO get Flash7 working! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:38:43 -0000 Written by Rudy on 01/10/08 18:58>> > Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > >>> rm /usr/ports/distfiles/flashplugin/fp7_archive.zip >>> >> >> An other way to fix it in some ways is to run a make makesum to update >> the distfile checksums > > The fp7_archive.zip was an odd case were I felt more comfortable > deleting it -- hadn't see that error before (and didn't save it to cut > and paste). I thought it was only my system, but apparently, others had > this same issue with the fp7_archive.zip file. Maybe a new one was > released with the same filename on adobe? > > Would "makesum" would blindly use what is in the /usr/ports/distfiles -- > corrupt, man-in-the-middled, or whatever was there? I've never used > makesum... I will RTFM. :) > > Rudy > I haven't been following this thread, but FWIW make sure you disable the Composite extension on your X server, or the plugin will not work correctly. I'm not sure why, but without disabling Composite I've only gotten gray windows where the player should be. In xorg.conf: Section "Extensions" Option "Composite" "Off" EndSection From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 17:01:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 965E216A4AB for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:01:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D5F13C474 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:01:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m0EGwsUH077576; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:58:54 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m0EGwrnO077575; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:58:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:58:53 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Matiss Message-ID: <20080114165853.GB77355@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <1200296141.478b10cd53c0f@www.inbox.lv> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1200296141.478b10cd53c0f@www.inbox.lv> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which environment variable? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:01:05 -0000 On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 09:35:41AM +0200, Matiss wrote: > Is there such environment variable, which changes window title for > putty? I mean, MC is able to change it to working dir I think.. How > do I change that title to let's say server name for my shell? I think what you are referring to is the Xterm title so you need to do that using Xterm stuff. I set the titles in my xinitrc file. There is probably something you can do on the fly too, but I have never tried it. But, anyway, look at setting Xterm window titles. ////jerry > > Thanks :) > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 19:00:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9159816A417 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:00:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swb@grasslake.net) Received: from accord.grasslake.net (accord.grasslake.net [209.98.56.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217F513C447 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:00:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swb@grasslake.net) Received: from [192.168.1.44] (quattro.grasslake.net [192.168.1.44]) by accord.grasslake.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0EIvIEb058182 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:57:18 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from swb@grasslake.net) Message-ID: <478BB12E.3030302@grasslake.net> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:59:58 -0600 From: Shawn Barnhart Organization: Managed Chaos User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Trendnet TEG-PCITXR hw rev 3.0 & re driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:00:01 -0000 Went looking for a cheap GigE PCI card to use with a 6.2 (6.3-PRERELEASE) stable system, and brought this home due to Microcenter not stocking Intel cards and me not wanting to wait for Newegg to ship one to me. I have the re driver built into the kernel, but this particular card is not recognized even though its supposed to be based on the Realtek 8169 chipset. Realtek has a linux driver download (of unknown quality) and that source has a mod time of 2/06, so I'm guessing it's not a reinvention of the wheel or a super-significant change. Anyone track these things close enough to know if there's something significant changed in this chipset family? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 19:39:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0133416A417 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:39:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex.rudyk@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA17913C44B for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:39:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex.rudyk@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 68so670204wra.13 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:39:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=QHy5vmK9Ziva6IIQNrZt5+U5L2MoiR2QyNcjpYvpKgs=; b=pgJpiPdWeW/zHs41DoJoB4HsDfZ3Dn369f+jHGLirRLG1YdZKIVfNzRrVR9FS5OrXYlMSJToE+QDgeGUBSNxW6lhmpx6c6Cxew8NUeljuquMnlSBLMqNRVs924LAXo8zX0aq9NXKAAWcG9uDCpJ1T83OXYHSbHtIjJW2A0pLJZY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=uVVcjxzg6FfCIBMQJ7pALXUaejqC5MMCrhjqmWsSXDwujIkVXfPMLTfMrK4H0i/WrVOoD1IqZPfO0vk7KTAs0eEEEflcW5NxMuyhxbKpVzDEaFbykuR8VcR2wxBWvyxW+lUTdXethh8F2OFKSXA1bzjeFv+hztRTmYoBFGpoRDM= Received: by 10.150.134.7 with SMTP id h7mr2572223ybd.97.1200337857352; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:10:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.212.2 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:10:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6e9d2bb40801141110v8f833b8v86ba21aa1d8fb258@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:10:57 -0800 From: "Oleksandr Rudyk" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: 7.0 RC1 snd_hda headset sound only X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:39:56 -0000 Hi all I have installed 7.0 RC1 on my Dell XPS m1330 with Sigmatel HDA sound. snd_hda driver was patched with this http://people.freebsd.org/~ariff/READMEinstructions. But still have audio only in headset and no sound on internal speakers. Any suggestions Thx From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 20:03:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A3A16A41A for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:03:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tbourke@triptrop.cse.unsw.edu.au) Received: from fallbackmx08.syd.optusnet.com.au (fallbackmx08.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE87D13C459 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:03:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tbourke@triptrop.cse.unsw.edu.au) Received: from mail03.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail03.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.184]) by fallbackmx08.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m0EBCNuT029164 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:12:23 +1100 Received: from triptrop.cse.unsw.edu.au (blaax11-a009.dialup.optusnet.com.au [203.164.190.9]) by mail03.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m0EBCIQf025346 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:12:20 +1100 Received: from triptrop.cse.unsw.edu.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by triptrop.cse.unsw.edu.au (8.14.1/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m0EB9UrB001874 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:09:30 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from tbourke@triptrop.cse.unsw.edu.au) Received: (from tbourke@localhost) by triptrop.cse.unsw.edu.au (8.14.1/8.13.6/Submit) id m0EB9UwK001873 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:09:30 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from tbourke) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:09:30 +1100 From: Timothy Bourke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080114110929.GB887@triptrop.cse.unsw.EDU.AU> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20080114071251.GA11712@Klabautermann.ks.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8NvZYKFJsRX2Djef" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080114071251.GA11712@Klabautermann.ks.se> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-PGP-Key: http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~tbourke/pubkey.txt Subject: Re: Reinterpret gamepad input as keyboeard input X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:03:32 -0000 --8NvZYKFJsRX2Djef Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Jan 14 at 08:12 +0100, Christopher Illies wrote: > I have a gamepad and would like to make certain gamepad actions to be > seen as regular keyboard input. Is this possible? >=20 > I tried out usbhidaction with something like: > Generic_Desktop:Game_Pad.Button:Button_1 1 1 /bin/echo -n ls >=20 > Obviously, this approach does not work as I hoped. "ls" is echoed in a > shell window, but it is not interpreted as input. Would vkbd(4) do the trick? Tim. --8NvZYKFJsRX2Djef Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHi0LptKVK1sFb0ecRAj0NAJ0XlOfWKZN30ygFQuQfH4efu2ffVgCfbN/N cS6U/EmZe8/wuPX+yGUCSs4= =wf+E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8NvZYKFJsRX2Djef-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 20:12:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 781DC16A418 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:12:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jackbarnett@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ACA513C458 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:12:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jackbarnett@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so3251102pyb.10 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:12:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mj5ddsmklHj7PBBFbumnll0oCmxcgOoFgdYt+3B/Rac=; b=M8lGFS5DiEWfEMsx4CcC4fg5EAgYzBi73jojfJtWQ7/wk4ZvbXgJvQr1JG1RwRqssCF1fa2ffuBDO+3Ub060euU7drbrF9D9P3ermfeAVVVbghc8+wA7YD0l4c2kZBo2ArK48jHkQu+9JO2coWv7jNndBt9QbwNwisI0qEjjQGI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=PVqQ8p5HpOEpGgv3RkDK2h68GzHnhqCw//MG3ZbBC3PXRzS42J4qouWV+7KM/vh2PLPHngy73xSpFlcWL+TrFfO88etPSW78lxWvoN2ZGcmtksdMZoj3NnX4JEJgMVV2F1RcXJVzLRO7qGQNwj0wnT7YaH00W8jI7qpxFJccti0= Received: by 10.35.63.2 with SMTP id q2mr7279312pyk.49.1200341538518; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:12:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.17.10? ( [67.190.229.42]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n63sm16425339pyh.44.2008.01.14.12.12.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:12:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <478BC21F.5040307@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:12:15 -0600 From: Jack Barnett User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Almberg References: <87A9631B-EAC5-41B8-B4C2-001C3ADBA486@identry.com> In-Reply-To: <87A9631B-EAC5-41B8-B4C2-001C3ADBA486@identry.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No spam??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jackbarnett@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:12:19 -0000 John Almberg wrote: > Last week I set up a brand new mail server with a combination of > pf/spamassassin/maildrop for spam filtering... Everything seems to > work great. All real mail seems to be getting through. I monitored the > spamd and maildrop logs during the first few days to make sure my very > conservative spam settings (spamd marks email that scored higher than > 5 as spam, and maildrop drops spam that scores higher than 12) to make > sure that real mail isn't getting dropped. > > At the beginning of the week, I was getting a few spam a day in my > spam folder. What has me spooked is that this whole weekend I got > exactly one spam in my spam folder (a false positive, in fact). This > is down from around 500 that I normally get per day (which is why I > was keen to get an up-to-date mailserver!) > > I know this is an odd thing to worry about, but is this normal? Since > the spam doesn't even seem to be reaching spamd, I'm guessing that the > real hero is pf, which must be blocking 99.99% of spam at the packet > level. > > Is this normal? > > TIA: John > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" How did you setup pf? You just have a 'generic' blacklist? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 20:19:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92C7816A41B for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:19:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F9213C442; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:19:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <478BC3CA.8010307@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:19:22 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christian Baer References: <478AA6DE.2080905@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Changing the output of uname -m or -p X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:19:24 -0000 Christian Baer wrote: > On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 01:03:42 +0100 Kris Kennaway wrote: > >>> Can this even be done and if so how? >> See the manpage, and the UNAME_* variables. > > One other thing: Will that change the way the system reacts in any way? > Apps should run normally (well, a browser may give a wrong plattform > information but that should be it). But what happens if you try to compile > something? Will a wrong plattform or CPU variable screw up what the > compiler spits out? Could be rather unhealthy if the compiler optimizes > code for a sun4u on an i386. :-) It will confuse some things, yes. e.g. buildworld and ports, and maybe some things at runtime. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 20:26:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B36B16A421 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:26:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from modulok@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0AD813C46A for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:26:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from modulok@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id l8so962812nzf.13 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:26:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=hfxdrMzyf2ZVh+qwEM/Drfa/yT7bYnPdFNrwRlNNf1U=; b=f57/Z++FOtM8YSMPPEfQTxHNAxpGUE9Y0lGsxysO55/FhqmMtlifd2GpQw8tEae1VIxy6qX/9xih1FHFRXnogYE+SRYRS2qebozv3f/a9sxLb5a0ysEdplnJdqXe8wakaLKU/kQYpMmPP14d2N4Rc5emNti54rdNm2gBxT06vSI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=suomJiW0WBDKqaPyRf1xSJx1iFp+8OzTgkm75AjHGGB2blAq6c7m8za+zHpmti8rDE0QPi3sXkY/kqkJsx1vReQ3GBIqTB9dRSqw0kiZlTihMdwC4GAZkKmjdnxEqK77KkLsYdhu6jQujwEwRshW0H/hca+D4k1e09/ddhrmdUg= Received: by 10.110.41.17 with SMTP id o17mr2312883tio.29.1200342383677; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:26:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.50.8 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:26:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <64c038660801141226w6616789apb2e539a42c7ac454@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:26:23 -0700 From: Modulok To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <478B885E.20505@cs.okstate.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <64c038660801040516u5c42a6cpadb475ad67fb4730@mail.gmail.com> <64c038660801041029t1a9662bayed3ca02fd46c7ece@mail.gmail.com> <64c038660801041226k1d350bc6p727e4666ea295727@mail.gmail.com> <477FFE14.1010704@monkeybrains.net> <477FFF63.50004@gmail.com> <47801D54.8050709@gmail.com> <47803E3F.2080005@monkeybrains.net> <47804901.6090007@gmail.com> <4786BF45.8030602@monkeybrains.net> <478B885E.20505@cs.okstate.edu> Subject: Re: HOW-TO get Flash7 working! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:26:26 -0000 Does anyone else have audio/video sync issues with linux-flashplugin7? Following the general procedure outlined in this thread, linux-flashplugin7 does work...sort of. The video proceeds the audio. This holds true for linux-opera and linux-firefox. The synch gap widens as time progresses. In a 5 minute clip, the offset is probably 5-10 seconds or more. Anyone else? -Modulok- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 20:26:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4BA16A41A for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:26:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F251913C44B for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:26:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m0EKOLCA078481; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:24:21 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m0EKOLIL078480; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:24:21 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:24:21 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Patrick Baldwin Message-ID: <20080114202421.GA78451@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <475F1727.8050501@studsvik.com> <5ea5cca50712121718j5a5c1964hc7da09a72924bc5b@mail.gmail.com> <47615582.9060202@studsvik.com> <20071213160229.GB15976@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071213160229.GB15976@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Mounting Western Digital USB drive? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:26:39 -0000 On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:02:29AM -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 10:53:38AM -0500, Patrick Baldwin wrote: > > > > > I'm wondering if I need to format the USB drive for use with FreeBSD? > > I think you will have to use something to divide the disk in to more > than one slice, each of which can be what you want - fat32, FreeBSD, etc. > or maybe upgrade to a more recent FreeBSD. > > I tried it with Partition Magic, but it failed because it wouldn't > recognize USB disks - not even the 8.0 version which claims it will. > > I haven't had time to try gparted or any others. Will do so soon. Just a followup. I finally got around to downloading the gparted boot disk and it worked just fine. I was able to muck with my external USB drive all I wanted. Not as pretty a display as Partition Magic but close and has the advantage that it works. ////jerry > > ////jerry > > > > > > > >On 12/12/07, Patrick Baldwin wrote: > > >>Hi, I'm trying to mount a 160 GB Western Digital USB 2.0 drive on a > > >>FreeBSD 6.2 system. This seemed like it should be relatively simple, > > >>but: > > >> > > >>webmail# mount /dev/da0s1 /mnt/usbdrive > > >>mount: /dev/da0s1 on /mnt/usbdrive: incorrect super block > > >> > > >>OK, it seemed a good chance the USB drive was formatted with NTFS, so I > > >>tried: > > >> > > >>webmail# mount_ntfs /dev/da0s1 /mnt/usbdrive > > >>mount_ntfs: /dev/da0s1: Invalid argument > > >> > > >>Further reading on mount_ntfs suggested that even if I got it to > > >>work, it's not quite what I want: I want read & write access > > >>with compressed files supported. > > >> > > >>dmesg: > > >>umass0: Western Digital External HDD, rev 2.00/1.04, addr 2 > > >>da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > > >>da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-4 device > > >>da0: 40.000MB/s transfers > > >>da0: 152627MB (312581808 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 19457C) > > >> > > >> usbdevs -v > > >>Controller /dev/usb0: > > >>addr 1: full speed, self powered, config 1, UHCI root hub(0x0000), > > >>Intel(0x0000), rev 1.00 > > >> port 1 powered > > >> port 2 powered > > >>Controller /dev/usb1: > > >>addr 1: full speed, self powered, config 1, UHCI root hub(0x0000), > > >>Intel(0x0000), rev 1.00 > > >> port 1 powered > > >> port 2 powered > > >>Controller /dev/usb2: > > >>addr 1: high speed, self powered, config 1, EHCI root hub(0x0000), > > >>Intel(0x0000), rev 1.00 > > >> port 1 addr 2: high speed, self powered, config 1, External > > >>HDD(0x0702), Western Digital(0x1058), rev 1.04 > > >> port 2 powered > > >> port 3 powered > > >> port 4 powered > > >> > > >>Any help appreciated. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>_______________________________________________ > > >>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > >>"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 20:41:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3932F16A418 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:41:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from mail.monochrome.org (b4.ebbed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.235.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D7B13C457 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:41:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from [192.168.1.11] ([192.168.1.11]) by mail.monochrome.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0EKfstw098454; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:41:54 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:41:32 -0500 (EST) From: Chris Hill To: John Almberg In-Reply-To: <87A9631B-EAC5-41B8-B4C2-001C3ADBA486@identry.com> Message-ID: <20080114154006.H13053@tripel.monochrome.org> References: <87A9631B-EAC5-41B8-B4C2-001C3ADBA486@identry.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No spam??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:41:56 -0000 On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, John Almberg wrote: [...] > At the beginning of the week, I was getting a few spam a day in my > spam folder. What has me spooked is that this whole weekend I got > exactly one spam in my spam folder (a false positive, in fact). This > is down from around 500 that I normally get per day (which is why I > was keen to get an up-to-date mailserver!) > > I know this is an odd thing to worry about, but is this normal? Since > the spam doesn't even seem to be reaching spamd, I'm guessing that the > real hero is pf, which must be blocking 99.99% of spam at the packet > level. > > Is this normal? I don't know if it's normal or not, but it sounds like a great result. Would you mind sharing your pf config? -- Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 22:08:25 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C6016A419 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:08:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swb@grasslake.net) Received: from accord.grasslake.net (accord.grasslake.net [209.98.56.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D7613C469 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:08:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swb@grasslake.net) Received: from [192.168.1.44] (quattro.grasslake.net [192.168.1.44]) by accord.grasslake.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0EM5fTq081284 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:05:41 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from swb@grasslake.net) Message-ID: <478BDD57.5050104@grasslake.net> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:08:23 -0600 From: Shawn Barnhart Organization: Managed Chaos User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <478BB12E.3030302@grasslake.net> In-Reply-To: <478BB12E.3030302@grasslake.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Trendnet TEG-PCITXR hw rev 3.0 & re driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:08:25 -0000 Shawn Barnhart wrote: > Went looking for a cheap GigE PCI card to use with a 6.2 > (6.3-PRERELEASE) stable system, and brought this home due to > Microcenter not stocking Intel cards and me not wanting to wait for > Newegg to ship one to me. Card works after switching slots on the motherboard, but I got "re0: watchdog timer" errors on reboot and no traffic on the card. I unplugged and replugged the NIC cable at the switch end and I get traffic now, but I have a proper Intel card on order from Newegg. I don't trust this one. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 22:37:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DE9916A41B for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:37:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from walt@wump.org) Received: from mtai05.charter.net (mtai05.charter.net [209.225.8.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C303413C447 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:37:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from walt@wump.org) Received: from aarprv06.charter.net ([10.20.200.76]) by mtai05.charter.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.00 201-2186-121-20061213) with ESMTP id <20080114223717.REJS28056.mtai05.charter.net@aarprv06.charter.net>; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:37:17 -0500 Received: from [10.0.0.10] (really [68.116.98.9]) by aarprv06.charter.net with ESMTP id <20080114223717.PMSE14098.aarprv06.charter.net@[10.0.0.10]>; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:37:17 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <1200224510.4789f8fe22c7a@www.inbox.lv> References: <1200224510.4789f8fe22c7a@www.inbox.lv> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:36:54 -0800 To: Matiss , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Walt Pawley Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Chzlrs: 0 Cc: Subject: Re: (bez temata) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:37:29 -0000 At 1:41 PM +0200 1/13/08, Matiss wrote: > >Hey all > >Hope this is more or less right place to ask. > >What I noticed on my FreeBSD 6.2 installation, that >pkg_add -r ImageMagick results in a file not found error. > >DTG864# pkg_add -r ImageMagick >Error: FTP Unable to get >ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/Latest/ImageMagick.tbz: >File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) > >same with pkg_add -r ImageMagick-nox11. > >and sure enough, indeed there is no ImageMagick.tbz on freebsd ftp >server for freebsd version 6. Browsed the net, but couldn't find any >info on this. > >Of course I could compile from ports, but that takes too much time. > >So, any ideas, why there is no ImageMagick.tbz, and what shall one >do? :) I've run into this sort of thing myself. IMHO, the problem is perhaps a bit of overzealousness on the part of developers to get people to "upgrade". Apparently 6.0 is considered too obsolete to maintain on mainstream servers, not that I really know as I have nothing to do with any of that. If you want to run the package that was released with 6.0, apparently ImageMagick-6.2.2.1.tbz, you can try the URL . -- Walter M. Pawley Wump Research & Company 676 River Bend Road, Roseburg, OR 97470 541-672-8975 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 01:04:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B5FD16A41A for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 01:04:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lveax.m@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E1613C43E for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 01:04:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lveax.m@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so604328anc.13 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:04:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=Ku4wsEnuAZ+7xqiQVS8WUFWX7UVIZE+NYAM07ooucnI=; b=UBt7NV3SRgMXEXiOB1UN4fUgXHPbKWg7rf6Q93pFiPR4tatdvQjH9AkZ1NlTXFVUtokLYkiHb0GSKUS7LeqFxihkNBK4Atk36BZ0wLaLnD+mxFGrxdyhUZuLs0JWUMaixkJF48bw6X1Y7E/tG70Jpf0/Gx13n97Rrf0aYXvZqe4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=s73R18Myy3N1xQtaIXLiTdAeZat6s7LXBfGmIqPsCsPKnuEYCo7bSky2vEBtmQJ6Bv12484bLu+m7dILfct9NoftrC3DR/4Mkb9COkTa9wRJzyWdj2qODRHwiPn3s2UlTj62CCdPIcJKRvDtGwcWdomoAef8dxZJ+nCYyEI5L+w= Received: by 10.100.232.13 with SMTP id e13mr15496757anh.21.1200359089126; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:04:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.32.1 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:04:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <576dcbc20801141704h48f349b3n1bd10394c0b8a1a3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:04:49 +0800 From: lveax To: "Oleksandr Rudyk" In-Reply-To: <6e9d2bb40801141110v8f833b8v86ba21aa1d8fb258@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <6e9d2bb40801141110v8f833b8v86ba21aa1d8fb258@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 7.0 RC1 snd_hda headset sound only X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 01:04:50 -0000 On Jan 15, 2008 3:10 AM, Oleksandr Rudyk wrote: > Hi all > > I have installed 7.0 RC1 on my Dell XPS m1330 with Sigmatel HDA sound. > snd_hda driver was patched with this > http://people.freebsd.org/~ariff/READMEinstructions. > > But still have audio only in headset and no sound on internal speakers. > > Any suggestions > try to add hint.pcm.0.config="gpio0" to your /boot/loader.conf that w From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 02:37:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6862216A4A1 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 02:37:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA8B013C447 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 02:37:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m0F2bufs078657 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:37:56 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.6/8.12.11) id m0F2bqEg000116; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:37:52 +0700 (ICT) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:37:52 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200801150237.m0F2bqEg000116@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: jalmberg@identry.com In-reply-to: <87A9631B-EAC5-41B8-B4C2-001C3ADBA486@identry.com> (message from John Almberg on Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:06:20 -0500) References: <87A9631B-EAC5-41B8-B4C2-001C3ADBA486@identry.com> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No spam??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 02:37:59 -0000 > I know this is an odd thing to worry about, but is this normal? Since > the spam doesn't even seem to be reaching spamd, I'm guessing that > the real hero is pf, which must be blocking 99.99% of spam at the > packet level. I don't know how you configured pf, but since I use the black list fromhttp://www.sa-blacklist.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/sa-blacklist.current.sendmail-access, I reduced drastically the spam that reaches SpamAssassin. The key point with such black list is that you must trust the list, as there is no place for false positive. Bests, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 03:11:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B99A816A4C5 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:11:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A9C113C458 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:11:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so2771074fgg.35 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:11:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=WkegO7fhwYHcPBfetr4akCye8+HzIwtbOqkvVPWZGaY=; b=ruG5L4rjqzdgYvly3FzflExA7OQCH+FtlEoZ+w8BBzC6MYuy+NR1ZKiSHlHT3KIROlTDrwHyL09rEbxoY54nisGw8Fm5CdAe5PE2Y/CQ1pa5XaiJO0rdfY2IxB+tCnMcbc7MckqN2MYC9nx+ZNqVRz9HMRoF+yHAq+8VDjwKnow= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=dY6Efknji1OpYm0tMM/hLljODA755Vbb94nZjbH0VOxINI5JLOQTpRX5lAjqvMAhrhLJGIxfSsYlZJSpKdJxEjAAIUW9ylrHH5a9fVJwdzX8IqgBLV6LGd45B52+t7kiLUekkoSjEdakmM+xUeJppICqXMp0rNTEHqiCG5iM+Ws= Received: by 10.82.140.20 with SMTP id n20mr12242826bud.27.1200365186056; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:46:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.180.16 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:46:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <560f92640801141846u319f8bbduc1ecd4be656ebf1c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:46:26 -0800 From: "Nerius Landys" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Mouse sensitivity X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:11:28 -0000 I'm wondering if it's possible to adjust the sensitivity of the mouse - that is, the amount of physical distance I have to move my mouse before 'moused' moves the cursor by one unit. I'm not talking about acceleration here. Purely a linear scaling is what I mean. I think we can leave Xorg out of this discussion for now - I am talking about console here. In '/etc/rc.conf', I can specify 'moused_flags="-a 2.0"' for example. However, what this does is make the tick of the mouse be in 2 unit increments. So, where the '-a 1.0' flag would move the cursor one unit at a time, '-a 2.0' moves the cursor two units at a time, and as a result, we lose some fine-grain mouse resolution. OK, now maybe I'll mention Xorg. I have a dual boot with Linux. In other words, it's all the same hardware - the mouse and everything. If I set 'moused_flags="-a 2.0"' in FreeBSD, the mouse cursor starts moving in two pixel increments (in Xorg) and thus loses resolution (note: also moves in two unit increments in console). So I'm leaving 'moused_flags' out of my config. Now, in both Linux and FreeBSD the cursor is able to move one pixel at a time in the X and Y directions (verified this with a magnifying glass). However, in Linux, I need to move the mouse half as much to get the cursor to move one pixel. Is there a way to speed up the mouse on the FreeBSD side as well? Would this way of speeding up the mouse also speed it up in the console? Because my Xorg uses /dev/sysmouse, I believe that the console pointer and the Xorg pointer are related. I'm aware of the 'xset' utility, but this does not seem to do anything for linear scaling, only acceleration. Also, it [of course] has no effect on the console pointer. I'm pretty new to FreeBSD, but I'm liking it! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 03:32:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA7B516A418 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:32:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A22413C44B for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:32:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JEcWp-0007co-Jb for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:31:55 +0000 Received: from 78-107-203-47.broadband.corbina.ru ([78.107.203.47]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:31:55 +0000 Received: from swell.k by 78-107-203-47.broadband.corbina.ru with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:31:55 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: swell.k@gmail.com Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:34:34 +0300 Lines: 8 Message-ID: <867iib92yd.fsf@gmail.com> References: <560f92640801141846u319f8bbduc1ecd4be656ebf1c@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 78-107-203-47.broadband.corbina.ru User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (berkeley-unix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:w/Ci2PjfSrV13s3oUj+NV6M7UAE= Sender: news Subject: Re: Mouse sensitivity X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:32:00 -0000 "Nerius Landys" writes: > I'm aware of the 'xset' utility, but this does not seem to do anything for > linear scaling, only acceleration. Also, it [of course] has no effect on > the console pointer. Linear? Do you mean threshold 0, like `xset m 3/2 0'? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 03:39:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E06E416A417 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:39:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noc@hdk5.net) Received: from guam10.hdk5.net (guam10.hdk5.net [66.180.132.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC8C213C45A for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:39:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noc@hdk5.net) Received: from [192.168.1.29] (unknown [66.180.149.18]) by guam10.hdk5.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 579BC5C22; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:42:10 -1000 (HST) Message-ID: <478C2B00.9020304@hdk5.net> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:39:44 -1000 From: NetOpsCenter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061211 FreeBSD/i386 SeaMonkey/1.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Shawn Barnhart References: <478BB12E.3030302@grasslake.net> In-Reply-To: <478BB12E.3030302@grasslake.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Trendnet TEG-PCITXR hw rev 3.0 & re driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: noc@hdk5.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:39:49 -0000 Shawn Barnhart wrote: > Went looking for a cheap GigE PCI card to use with a 6.2 > (6.3-PRERELEASE) stable system, and brought this home due to > Microcenter not stocking Intel cards and me not wanting to wait for > Newegg to ship one to me. > > I have the re driver built into the kernel, but this particular card > is not recognized even though its supposed to be based on the Realtek > 8169 chipset. Realtek has a linux driver download (of unknown > quality) and that source has a mod time of 2/06, so I'm guessing it's > not a reinvention of the wheel or a super-significant change. > > Anyone track these things close enough to know if there's something > significant changed in this chipset family? > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I have 5 of the nic cards TEG PCI TXR running on Various versions of 7. * and 8.* of FreeBSD. There was somebody on the weekind also having trouble with version 6.* Same as your problem. Try switch to 7.* ~Al Plant - Honolulu, Hawaii - Phone: 808-284-2740 + http://hawaiidakine.com + http://freebsdinfo.org + noc@hdk5.net + + http://aloha50.net - Supporting - FreeBSD 6.* - 7.* + "All that's really worth doing is what we do for others."- Lewis Carrol From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 04:00:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C92816A419 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:00:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jlehman@digitalguy.net) Received: from QMTA06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.56]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44CB313C458 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:00:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jlehman@digitalguy.net) Received: from OMTA14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.60]) by QMTA06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id dCrx1Y00H1HzFnQ050KX00; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:00:41 +0000 Received: from abby.digitalguy.net ([67.190.229.227]) by OMTA14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id dG0L1Y00H4v1K1P3a00000; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:00:21 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=yybSYV7XAAAA:8 a=dllmIRal47J8mvQ-A5AA:9 a=MFyKxQX5ioPfa-l9D95uxgHVOPIA:4 a=b8hG5vVbyAkA:10 a=GFD01CUaZadTdFSSJSgA:9 a=b6QzwDZuiniQSGzzIYv7BoqTRgIA:4 a=rPt6xJ-oxjAA:10 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by abby.digitalguy.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8AD67F66 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:00:40 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.5.3 (20071212) at digitalguy.net Received: from abby.digitalguy.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (abby.digitalguy.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nEX+nXCCCHza for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:00:23 -0600 (CST) Received: by abby.digitalguy.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B8B927F61; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:00:23 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:00:23 -0600 From: Jeffrey Lehman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080115040023.GA23399@abby.digitalguy.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND" Content-Disposition: inline X-PGP-Key: http://digitalguy.net/gnupg/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Subject: Ntop install error related to net-snmp X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:00:42 -0000 --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello all, I'm attempting to install Ntop 3.3_1 from ports and I'm hitting = a snag during compilation. =20 Here is the error: In file included from /usr/local/include/net-snmp/utilities.h:54, from /usr/local/include/net-snmp/net-snmp-includes.h:78, from iface.c:766: /usr/local/include/net-snmp/library/container.h: In function 'CONTAINER_FRE= E': /usr/local/include/net-snmp/library/container.h:416: error: lvalue required= as left operand of assignment I've got the latest version of net-snmp installed - 5.3.2. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks! --=20 Jeffrey Lehman http://digitalguy.net GPG Key fingerprint =3D 3087 CED0 57F7 3BD3 14E7 969B EE14 BADA D619 8CF5 --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHjC/W7hS62tYZjPURAlIaAKCDBwXMcYAktH/upk/3tNHcV3jl2ACfSggD o7r243bxRhMxKEpv36EwtCc= =uMh0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 05:10:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AF7716A419 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:10:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.157]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0801713C44B for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:10:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so2804974fgg.35 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:10:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=gY6Ro5hAnTAst4q99LhMoHDMEFML5i8ElzXVs+zavF0=; b=OMecGVwGpMGHBqSQiDdsfBCXLQg9Iw34iiMtuogAi6PDJtui27G3/6eFHkXdW0ymOLIpfYLsAiLAn75GTnp80WqLq88W7HbFzBiCfg0JVMBr3KuJt0ey0FsPk2Bxdt+/IXxo9tn/tFvHYk4Yef2vXoZ3kV9i1HK4pSsU39H2qh4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=kXNxxYwD/8FyDJH08R04x+sgRZginzbhYYnP0X/6EYAtMhRWZiGEsJJwT7ZCA+V7J18MJrqBaE1FI1juFDocfftKsUtHrj3fSph8PG5sTO159HXSWNm830C02HQg8lx7xlVEsj0Q2GgcjT7tYQAAFm2TlW9jgE8qyWMP9W8Qvec= Received: by 10.82.105.13 with SMTP id d13mr12385360buc.30.1200373844314; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:10:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.180.16 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:10:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <560f92640801142110x290cac6s7a3aa8893a60a5fa@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:10:44 -0800 From: "Nerius Landys" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <867iib92yd.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <560f92640801141846u319f8bbduc1ecd4be656ebf1c@mail.gmail.com> <867iib92yd.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Mouse sensitivity X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:10:46 -0000 > > I'm aware of the 'xset' utility, but this does not seem to do anything > for > > linear scaling, only acceleration. Also, it [of course] has no effect > on > > the console pointer. > > Linear? Do you mean threshold 0, like `xset m 3/2 0'? > 'xset' is indeed what I want. Err, `xset', not 'xset'. I'm learning the FreeBSD lingo. When I do `xset q' it gives me the defaults, and I get a line: Pointer Control: acceleration: 2/1 threshold: 4 So think what I want is something along the lines of `xset 3/1 3'. Thanks for the help. I didn't think `xset' would do what I wanted, but it does. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 05:57:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0764B16A507 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:57:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.154]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F82513C46E for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:57:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so2818190fgg.35 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:57:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=6P3Gkhz10kMKWOzx2uwr2YtZQylkAXnU7zvQvz8ThHA=; b=AiGPN96n8FrZEgPFtpMDGHq3Xw8VR5W7OjILThD9yJDkgqtMGX41WCYZjN+2JJ8UFlQieFsZNfpLadPSSASZg8PwLVe6xHA6djY5uo7ugFnR9EIyVDvhP/Ds/c1F9Lmj/9kth+xH+lO+Q9eAEZhb0IwF1pSBo6exyvHTt94KkGM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=CYc1/GaxKpY9kxAmJM7vBaLQ3oiKSxUIn5/YAc8C2Edj8csOcdqmXC4LoNSVO7jhG22zm7jGJ8VA9iRPo4eAnuinO1wQ3JOPkqZhIJBxDSoXXnmOXmxEg9vdjLckIEdKChHu4F1Ty1hAha0akEDFcx13ASF5IlrBKgejY2Jds+g= Received: by 10.82.184.2 with SMTP id h2mr12452594buf.22.1200376669937; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:57:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.180.16 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:57:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <560f92640801142157n7194be23u8c4eac084ed474c9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:57:49 -0800 From: "Nerius Landys" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: sysinstall and bsdlabel/boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:57:52 -0000 I was trying to install 7.0RC1 (hope it's OK to post this here, because I believe that older versions of FreeBSD have this same limitation) and came across a gotcha. I had an MBR on disk that I wanted to keep. It was Lilo and all it did was boot a selected slice, it was configured to function the same as FreeBSD's `boot0'. So, the install of FreeBSD came to the area where it asks what to do with the MBR. There are three choices: 1) boot manager, 2) simple MBR, and 3) do nothing. I chose to do nothing because I wanted to keep Lilo in the MBR. But, by choosing this option, I expected sysinstall to install the /boot/boot code to the beginning of the FreeBSD slice. Well, no such boot code was installed, apparently, unless I totally missed something. Basically, after the install, when I delegated Lilo to boot the chosen [FreeBSD] slice, it did not find any boot code on that slice. My workaround for this was to choose option 1) boot manager. I ended up using boot0 (the boot manager) which I feel is superior to Lilo because it is more modular, simpler. However, some users may not want this. I didn't find any option in sysinstall to install just the /boot/boot code to the beginning of the FreeBSD slice. Am I missing something? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 06:03:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B256B16A41A for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:03:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbigniew@szalbot.homedns.org) Received: from lists.lc-words.com (lists.lc-words.com [83.19.156.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7754B13C442 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:03:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbigniew@szalbot.homedns.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.szalbot.homedns.org [127.0.0.1]) by lists.lc-words.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27E013F442 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:03:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from lists.lc-words.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (szalbot.homedns.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10026) with ESMTP id 01004-01 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:03:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.11.4] (unknown [192.168.11.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.lc-words.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E30233F405 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:03:05 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <478C4C94.8080504@szalbot.homedns.org> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:03:00 +0100 From: zbigniew szalbot User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: newest security patch and custom kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:03:09 -0000 Hello, Using freebsd-update I applied the latest security patches which were announced yesterday. However, I then notice this message: The following files will be updated as part of updating to 6.2-RELEASE-p10: /boot/GENERIC/kernel My question is whether my update missed the point because I have a custom kernel? If so, do I need to apply it manually as described in the security advisory? If I still want to go down the binary road, how can I make sure my custom kernel gets patched, too? Thank you very much! Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 06:18:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24BFD16A41B for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:18:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norman@apache.org) Received: from vs159071.vserver.de (hiphopcorner.de [62.75.159.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0619413C44B for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:18:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norman@apache.org) Received: from [10.99.0.2] (unknown [213.188.107.182]) by vs159071.vserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 303ECBE848E; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:18:15 +0000 (UTC) From: Norman Maurer To: zbigniew szalbot In-Reply-To: <478C4C94.8080504@szalbot.homedns.org> References: <478C4C94.8080504@szalbot.homedns.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:18:06 +0100 Message-Id: <1200377886.6647.3.camel@norman-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: newest security patch and custom kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:18:17 -0000 Hi, the /usr/src/sys* stuff should be patched anyway. But you need to build your kernel again and install it to reflect the changes. Even if i think it only update the -p10 label in the case of -p10 patch set. cheers Norman Am Dienstag, den 15.01.2008, 07:03 +0100 schrieb zbigniew szalbot: > Hello, > > Using freebsd-update I applied the latest security patches which were > announced yesterday. However, I then notice this message: > > The following files will be updated as part of updating to 6.2-RELEASE-p10: > /boot/GENERIC/kernel > > My question is whether my update missed the point because I have a > custom kernel? If so, do I need to apply it manually as described in the > security advisory? If I still want to go down the binary road, how can I > make sure my custom kernel gets patched, too? > > Thank you very much! > > Zbigniew Szalbot > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 06:24:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA63A16A417 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:24:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbigniew@szalbot.homedns.org) Received: from lists.lc-words.com (lists.lc-words.com [83.19.156.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8093413C458 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:24:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbigniew@szalbot.homedns.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.szalbot.homedns.org [127.0.0.1]) by lists.lc-words.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE3AE3F442; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:24:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from lists.lc-words.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (szalbot.homedns.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10026) with ESMTP id 01006-03; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:24:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.11.4] (unknown [192.168.11.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.lc-words.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67CED3F405; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:24:08 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <478C5183.7090509@szalbot.homedns.org> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:24:03 +0100 From: zbigniew szalbot User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Norman Maurer References: <478C4C94.8080504@szalbot.homedns.org> <1200377886.6647.3.camel@norman-laptop> In-Reply-To: <1200377886.6647.3.camel@norman-laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: newest security patch and custom kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:24:10 -0000 Hello, Norman Maurer pisze: > Hi, > > the /usr/src/sys* stuff should be patched anyway. But you need to build > your kernel again and install it to reflect the changes. Even if i think > it only update the -p10 label in the case of -p10 patch set. > OK. So this page applies to me now? http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-building.html 1. Change to the /usr/src directory: # cd /usr/src 2. Compile the kernel: # make buildkernel KERNCONF=/MYKERNEL/ 3. Install the new kernel: # make installkernel KERNCONF=/MYKERNEL/ *Note:* It is required to have full FreeBSD source tree to build the kernel. I am interested if I need to download latest FBSD sources then? I have not touched them since I built a custom kernel. Thank you! Zbigniew Szalbot > cheers > Norman > > > Am Dienstag, den 15.01.2008, 07:03 +0100 schrieb zbigniew szalbot: > > Hello, > > > > Using freebsd-update I applied the latest security patches which were > > announced yesterday. However, I then notice this message: > > > > The following files will be updated as part of updating to 6.2-RELEASE-p10: > > /boot/GENERIC/kernel > > > > My question is whether my update missed the point because I have a > > custom kernel? If so, do I need to apply it manually as described in the > > security advisory? If I still want to go down the binary road, how can I > > make sure my custom kernel gets patched, too? > > > > Thank you very much! > > > > Zbigniew Szalbot > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 06:50:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69AD016A419 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:50:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norman@apache.org) Received: from vs159071.vserver.de (hiphopcorner.de [62.75.159.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2582713C4CE for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:50:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norman@apache.org) Received: from [10.99.0.2] (unknown [213.188.107.182]) by vs159071.vserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECF61BE85F8; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:50:45 +0000 (UTC) From: Norman Maurer To: zbigniew szalbot In-Reply-To: <478C5183.7090509@szalbot.homedns.org> References: <478C4C94.8080504@szalbot.homedns.org> <1200377886.6647.3.camel@norman-laptop> <478C5183.7090509@szalbot.homedns.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:50:37 +0100 Message-Id: <1200379837.6647.6.camel@norman-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: newest security patch and custom kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:50:47 -0000 It should be enough to just building and installing the kernel. The freebsd-update should have patched the kernel src files anyway. bye Norman Am Dienstag, den 15.01.2008, 07:24 +0100 schrieb zbigniew szalbot: > Hello, > > > Norman Maurer pisze: > > Hi, > > > > the /usr/src/sys* stuff should be patched anyway. But you need to build > > your kernel again and install it to reflect the changes. Even if i think > > it only update the -p10 label in the case of -p10 patch set. > > > OK. So this page applies to me now? > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-building.html > > 1. > > Change to the /usr/src directory: > > # cd /usr/src > > > 2. > > Compile the kernel: > > # make buildkernel KERNCONF=/MYKERNEL/ > > > 3. > > Install the new kernel: > > # make installkernel KERNCONF=/MYKERNEL/ > > > *Note:* It is required to have full FreeBSD source tree to build the > kernel. > > > I am interested if I need to download latest FBSD sources then? I have > not touched them since I built a custom kernel. > > Thank you! > > Zbigniew Szalbot > > > cheers > > Norman > > > > > > Am Dienstag, den 15.01.2008, 07:03 +0100 schrieb zbigniew szalbot: > > > Hello, > > > > > > Using freebsd-update I applied the latest security patches which were > > > announced yesterday. However, I then notice this message: > > > > > > The following files will be updated as part of updating to 6.2-RELEASE-p10: > > > /boot/GENERIC/kernel > > > > > > My question is whether my update missed the point because I have a > > > custom kernel? If so, do I need to apply it manually as described in the > > > security advisory? If I still want to go down the binary road, how can I > > > make sure my custom kernel gets patched, too? > > > > > > Thank you very much! > > > > > > Zbigniew Szalbot > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 07:46:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B1616A417 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:46:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crapsh@monkeybrains.net) Received: from ape.monkeybrains.net (ape.monkeybrains.net [208.69.40.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD52413C44B for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:46:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crapsh@monkeybrains.net) Received: from monchichi.monkeybrains.net (adsl-76-199-27-208.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net [76.199.27.208]) (authenticated bits=0) by ape.monkeybrains.net (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m0F7kV0D084887 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:46:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from crapsh@monkeybrains.net) Message-ID: <478C64D2.8030906@monkeybrains.net> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:46:26 -0800 From: Rudy User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071122) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Modulok References: <64c038660801040516u5c42a6cpadb475ad67fb4730@mail.gmail.com> <64c038660801041029t1a9662bayed3ca02fd46c7ece@mail.gmail.com> <64c038660801041226k1d350bc6p727e4666ea295727@mail.gmail.com> <477FFE14.1010704@monkeybrains.net> <477FFF63.50004@gmail.com> <47801D54.8050709@gmail.com> <47803E3F.2080005@monkeybrains.net> <47804901.6090007@gmail.com> <4786BF45.8030602@monkeybrains.net> <478B885E.20505@cs.okstate.edu> <64c038660801141226w6616789apb2e539a42c7ac454@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <64c038660801141226w6616789apb2e539a42c7ac454@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.92, clamav-milter version 0.92 on pita.monkeybrains.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HOW-TO get Flash7 working! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:46:31 -0000 Modulok wrote: > Does anyone else have audio/video sync issues with linux-flashplugin7? > Following the general procedure outlined in this thread, > linux-flashplugin7 does work...sort of. The video proceeds the audio. > This holds true for linux-opera and linux-firefox. The synch gap > widens as time progresses. In a 5 minute clip, the offset is probably > 5-10 seconds or more. I have audio lag as well. Never heard of turning off COMPOSITE mode in the xorg.conf... will try right now! Also, I got this update from Alexander Leidinger: "2.6.x emulation is not available in 6.x or 5.x (2.6.20 is totally wrong, the only 2.6 kernel version we are targeting ATM is 2.6.16). It is also not stable yet, there are known bugs. linux_base-f7 is also only useable with 2.6 emulation, installing it is not recommended for non-developers." so, set your linuxemu to a lower kernel version than I blindly recommended before: echo "compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.16" >> /etc/sysctl.conf I say, push forward and get 2.6.16 stable and forget 2.4.2 on the FreeBSD 7 branch! People want old linux emulation? Use FreeBSD 6! Time to restart X, Rudy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 07:53:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07D2F16A475 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:53:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbigniew@szalbot.homedns.org) Received: from lists.lc-words.com (lists.lc-words.com [83.19.156.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ACF813C4F5 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:53:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbigniew@szalbot.homedns.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.szalbot.homedns.org [127.0.0.1]) by lists.lc-words.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684163F406; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:53:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from lists.lc-words.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (szalbot.homedns.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10026) with ESMTP id 01016-01; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:53:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.11.4] (unknown [192.168.11.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.lc-words.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66573F404; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:53:04 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <478C665B.3060608@szalbot.homedns.org> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:52:59 +0100 From: zbigniew szalbot User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Norman Maurer References: <478C4C94.8080504@szalbot.homedns.org> <1200377886.6647.3.camel@norman-laptop> <478C5183.7090509@szalbot.homedns.org> <1200379837.6647.6.camel@norman-laptop> In-Reply-To: <1200379837.6647.6.camel@norman-laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: newest security patch and custom kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:53:08 -0000 Hello again, Norman Maurer pisze: > It should be enough to just building and installing the kernel. The > freebsd-update should have patched the kernel src files anyway. > Thank you for very helpful advice. One last question, is it necessary to restart the machine? Or can I keep it online after building and installing the kernel? I don't care about uname -a details not being updated unless the machine needs restarting to include the updates. Thank you! Zbigniew Szalbot > bye > Norman > > > Am Dienstag, den 15.01.2008, 07:24 +0100 schrieb zbigniew szalbot: > > Hello, > > > > > > Norman Maurer pisze: > > > Hi, > > > > > > the /usr/src/sys* stuff should be patched anyway. But you need to build > > > your kernel again and install it to reflect the changes. Even if i think > > > it only update the -p10 label in the case of -p10 patch set. > > > > > OK. So this page applies to me now? > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-building.html > > > > 1. > > > > Change to the /usr/src directory: > > > > # cd /usr/src > > > > > > 2. > > > > Compile the kernel: > > > > # make buildkernel KERNCONF=/MYKERNEL/ > > > > > > 3. > > > > Install the new kernel: > > > > # make installkernel KERNCONF=/MYKERNEL/ > > > > > > *Note:* It is required to have full FreeBSD source tree to build the > > kernel. > > > > > > I am interested if I need to download latest FBSD sources then? I have > > not touched them since I built a custom kernel. > > > > Thank you! > > > > Zbigniew Szalbot > > > > > cheers > > > Norman > > > > > > > > > Am Dienstag, den 15.01.2008, 07:03 +0100 schrieb zbigniew szalbot: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > Using freebsd-update I applied the latest security patches which were > > > > announced yesterday. However, I then notice this message: > > > > > > > > The following files will be updated as part of updating to 6.2-RELEASE-p10: > > > > /boot/GENERIC/kernel > > > > > > > > My question is whether my update missed the point because I have a > > > > custom kernel? If so, do I need to apply it manually as described in the > > > > security advisory? If I still want to go down the binary road, how can I > > > > make sure my custom kernel gets patched, too? > > > > > > > > Thank you very much! > > > > > > > > Zbigniew Szalbot > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 08:33:44 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D7C16A41A for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:33:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norman@apache.org) Received: from vs159071.vserver.de (hiphopcorner.de [62.75.159.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 992D913C469 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:33:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norman@apache.org) Received: from [10.99.0.2] (unknown [213.188.107.182]) by vs159071.vserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82194BE85F8; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:33:42 +0000 (UTC) From: Norman Maurer To: zbigniew szalbot In-Reply-To: <478C665B.3060608@szalbot.homedns.org> References: <478C4C94.8080504@szalbot.homedns.org> <1200377886.6647.3.camel@norman-laptop> <478C5183.7090509@szalbot.homedns.org> <1200379837.6647.6.camel@norman-laptop> <478C665B.3060608@szalbot.homedns.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:33:34 +0100 Message-Id: <1200386014.6647.7.camel@norman-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: newest security patch and custom kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:33:44 -0000 The -p10 includes no kernel updates so restarting is not neccesarry. bye Norman Am Dienstag, den 15.01.2008, 08:52 +0100 schrieb zbigniew szalbot: > Hello again, > > Norman Maurer pisze: > > It should be enough to just building and installing the kernel. The > > freebsd-update should have patched the kernel src files anyway. > > > Thank you for very helpful advice. One last question, is it necessary > to restart the machine? Or can I keep it online after building and > installing the kernel? I don't care about uname -a details not being > updated unless the machine needs restarting to include the updates. > > Thank you! > > Zbigniew Szalbot > > bye > > Norman > > > > > > Am Dienstag, den 15.01.2008, 07:24 +0100 schrieb zbigniew szalbot: > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > Norman Maurer pisze: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > the /usr/src/sys* stuff should be patched anyway. But you need to build > > > > your kernel again and install it to reflect the changes. Even if i think > > > > it only update the -p10 label in the case of -p10 patch set. > > > > > > > OK. So this page applies to me now? > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-building.html > > > > > > 1. > > > > > > Change to the /usr/src directory: > > > > > > # cd /usr/src > > > > > > > > > 2. > > > > > > Compile the kernel: > > > > > > # make buildkernel KERNCONF=/MYKERNEL/ > > > > > > > > > 3. > > > > > > Install the new kernel: > > > > > > # make installkernel KERNCONF=/MYKERNEL/ > > > > > > > > > *Note:* It is required to have full FreeBSD source tree to build the > > > kernel. > > > > > > > > > I am interested if I need to download latest FBSD sources then? I have > > > not touched them since I built a custom kernel. > > > > > > Thank you! > > > > > > Zbigniew Szalbot > > > > > > > cheers > > > > Norman > > > > > > > > > > > > Am Dienstag, den 15.01.2008, 07:03 +0100 schrieb zbigniew szalbot: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > Using freebsd-update I applied the latest security patches which were > > > > > announced yesterday. However, I then notice this message: > > > > > > > > > > The following files will be updated as part of updating to 6.2-RELEASE-p10: > > > > > /boot/GENERIC/kernel > > > > > > > > > > My question is whether my update missed the point because I have a > > > > > custom kernel? If so, do I need to apply it manually as described in the > > > > > security advisory? If I still want to go down the binary road, how can I > > > > > make sure my custom kernel gets patched, too? > > > > > > > > > > Thank you very much! > > > > > > > > > > Zbigniew Szalbot > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > > > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 09:12:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C56E916A419 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:12:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wundram@beenic.net) Received: from mail.beenic.net (mail.beenic.net [83.246.72.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3AE13C465 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:12:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wundram@beenic.net) Received: from [192.168.1.32] (a89-182-2-100.net-htp.de [89.182.2.100]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.beenic.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF398A44529 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:05:24 +0100 (CET) From: "Heiko Wundram (Beenic)" Organization: Beenic Networks GmbH To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:13:19 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801151013.20051.wundram@beenic.net> Subject: OT: Greylisting and Yahoo Mailinglists X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:12:35 -0000 Hey all! A colleague of mine tracks a Yahoo mailing list, but always gets mails from them with a large delay (or not at all) due to our mailserver doing greylisting. This comes from the fact that the triplet that represents a message sent from a Yahoo mailing list changes with every message (because the envelope-sender _always_ contains a unique ID to do bounce detection). Additionally, I can't seem to make out a set of "subnets" from which the messages arrive; I've so far identified at least five subnets that Yahoo uses to send messages out (and I'm hesitant to add five subnets to the whitelist, especially when they're not closely related in any way as Yahoos subnets seem to be: 66.94.237, 66.163.168, 66.163.169, 69.147.103 and 209.131.38 is what I've seen so far from old messages at a quick glance). Anybody here have the same problem, and has rules for whitelisting Yahoo mailing lists properly? Thanks! -- Heiko Wundram Product & Application Development From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 09:52:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B31C516A418 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:52:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@nicoelro.net) Received: from smtp19.orange.fr (smtp19.orange.fr [80.12.242.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C4913C458 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:52:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@nicoelro.net) Received: from smtp19.orange.fr (mwinf1903 [172.22.129.25]) by mwinf1915.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 706CF5C1B521 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:54:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1903.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 4628E1C000E5 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:54:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (ALyon-252-1-61-148.w82-122.abo.wanadoo.fr [82.122.171.148]) by mwinf1903.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id EE9DB1C0008A for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:54:12 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20080115085412977.EE9DB1C0008A@mwinf1903.orange.fr Message-ID: <478C74B4.4070408@nicoelro.net> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:54:12 +0100 From: Nicolas Letellier User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Very bad performances with wpi driver and 7.0-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nicolas@nicoelro.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:52:03 -0000 Hello, I use FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 with my laptop (Asustek A6000 Series). Performances with wpi are very very bad: in my LAN, I download a file at 4 k/s. In Internet, I would believe I use a 56 k connection :-) In this laptop, I have a NIC (chipset re), and I don't have any problem with. The connection is very very stable. The problem is juste with wpi and my Wireless NIC. I test OpenBSD-current, and I didn't have any problem with wpi. The problem is juste with FreeBSD 7.0-RC1. I have any firewalls, nothing. All is perfect with my NIC re. I test with GENERIC, and I build my own kernel (with wpi support build into kernel). The problem is the same. See more informations here: numenor# cat /boot/loader.conf nvidia_load="YES" wpifw_load="YES" legal.intel_wpi.license_ack=1 numenor# cat /etc/rc.conf defaultrouter="192.168.1.249" hostname="numenor.********" ifconfig_wpi0="inet 192.168.1.4 ssid Nicoelro_Wifi" numenor# ifconfig wpi0 wpi0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 ether 00:13:02:dd:05:5f inet 192.168.1.4 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (OFDM/36Mbps) status: associated ssid Nicoelro_Wifi channel 10 (2457 Mhz 11g) bssid 00:0f:b5:b9:9f:cc authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpower 50 bmiss 7 scanvalid 60 protmode CTS Sometimes, I see this message: wpi0: discard frame w/o packet header numenor# sysctl -a | grep wpi net.wlan.0.%parent: wpi0 debug.wpi: 0 dev.wpi.0.%desc: Intel(R) PRO/Wireless 3945ABG dev.wpi.0.%driver: wpi dev.wpi.0.%location: slot=0 function=0 handle=\_SB_.PCI0.P0P7.WLAN dev.wpi.0.%pnpinfo: vendor=0x8086 device=0x4222 subvendor=0x8086 subdevice=0x1001 class=0x028000 dev.wpi.0.%parent: pci3 numenor# dmesg *Copyright (c) 1992-2008 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 #1: Mon Jan 14 18:12:58 CET 2008 root@numenor.nicoelro.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NUMENOR Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Genuine Intel(R) CPU T2300 @ 1.66GHz (1662.52-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6e8 Stepping = 8 Features=0xbfe9fbff Features2=0xc189 AMD Features=0x100000 Cores per package: 2 real memory = 1073545216 (1023 MB) avail memory = 1032773632 (984 MB) ACPI APIC Table: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard kbd1 at kbdmux0 hptrr: HPT RocketRAID controller driver v1.1 (Jan 14 2008 18:12:38) acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: [ITHREAD] acpi0: Power Button (fixed) acpi0: reservation of 0, a0000 (3) failed acpi0: reservation of 100000, 3ff00000 (3) failed Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x808-0x80b on acpi0 acpi_ec0: port 0x62,0x66 on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 est0: on cpu0 est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized. est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr 6130a2c06000613 device_attach: est0 attach returned 6 p4tcc0: on cpu0 cpu1: on acpi0 ACPI Warning (tbutils-0243): Incorrect checksum in table [SSDT] - D6, should be 9C [20070320] est1: on cpu1 p4tcc1: on cpu1 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: irq 16 at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 nvidia0: mem 0xfd000000-0xfdffffff,0xc0000000-0xcfffffff,0xfc000000-0xfcffffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1 nvidia0: [GIANT-LOCKED] nvidia0: [ITHREAD] pcm0: mem 0xfebfc000-0xfebfffff irq 21 at device 27.0 on pci0 pcm0: [ITHREAD] pcib2: irq 16 at device 28.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 re0: port 0xc800-0xc8ff mem 0xfe0ff000-0xfe0fffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci2 re0: Using 2 MSI messages miibus0: on re0 rgephy0: PHY 1 on miibus0 rgephy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX, auto re0: Ethernet address: 00:18:f3:5b:f6:31 re0: [FILTER] re0: [FILTER] pcib3: irq 19 at device 28.3 on pci0 pci3: on pcib3 wpi0: mem 0xfe1ff000-0xfe1fffff irq 19 at device 0.0 on pci3 bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. wpi0: Ethernet address: 00:13:02:dd:05:5f wpi0: [ITHREAD] wpi0: 11a rates: 6Mbps 9Mbps 12Mbps 18Mbps 24Mbps 36Mbps 48Mbps 54Mbps wpi0: 11b rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps wpi0: 11g rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps 6Mbps 9Mbps 12Mbps 18Mbps 24Mbps 36Mbps 48Mbps 54Mbps uhci0: port 0xec00-0xec1f irq 23 at device 29.0 on pci0 uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] uhci0: [ITHREAD] usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: on usb0 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: port 0xe880-0xe89f irq 19 at device 29.1 on pci0 uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] uhci1: [ITHREAD] usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: on usb1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2: port 0xe800-0xe81f irq 18 at device 29.2 on pci0 uhci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] uhci2: [ITHREAD] usb2: on uhci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: on usb2 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci3: port 0xe480-0xe49f irq 22 at device 29.3 on pci0 uhci3: [GIANT-LOCKED] uhci3: [ITHREAD] usb3: on uhci3 usb3: USB revision 1.0 uhub3: on usb3 uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci0: mem 0xfebfbc00-0xfebfbfff irq 23 at device 29.7 on pci0 ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] ehci0: [ITHREAD] usb4: EHCI version 1.0 usb4: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2 usb3 usb4: on ehci0 usb4: USB revision 2.0 uhub4: on usb4 uhub4: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered ugen0: on uhub4 pcib4: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci4: on pcib4 pci4: at device 1.0 (no driver attached) pci4: at device 1.1 (no driver attached) pci4: at device 1.2 (no driver attached) pci4: at device 1.3 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xffa0-0xffaf at device 31.1 on pci0 ata0: on atapci0 ata0: [ITHREAD] ata1: on atapci0 ata1: [ITHREAD] acpi_lid0: on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 acpi_button1: on acpi0 acpi_tz0: on acpi0 acpi_acad0: on acpi0 battery0: on acpi0 atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] atkbd0: [ITHREAD] psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: [ITHREAD] psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3 pmtimer0 on isa0 orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xcefff pnpid ORM0000 on isa0 ppc0: parallel port not found. sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 ums0: on uhub0 ums0: 3 buttons and Z dir. Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec hptrr: no controller detected. ad0: 95396MB at ata0-master UDMA100 acd0: DVDR at ata0-slave UDMA33 pcm0: pcm0: SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! GEOM_LABEL: Label for provider ad0s1 is msdosfs/RECOVERY. GEOM_LABEL: Label for provider ad0s2 is ntfs/Syst\M-hme. GEOM_LABEL: Label for provider ad0s5 is msdosfs/ . Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s3a * Am is alone with this performance problem? I cannot use wpi driver in these conditions, so I use re driver for my NIC. Nicolas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 10:37:44 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A493E16A419 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:37:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jimbow@darq.net) Received: from farnborough.darq.net (fab.darq.net [82.136.41.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A5513C458 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:37:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jimbow@darq.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by farnborough.darq.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB9A21D0DF for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:38:03 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at darq.net Received: from farnborough.darq.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (farnborough.darq.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8x+iR8sbjnnH for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:37:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from troop.darq.net (hackney.darq.net [78.86.112.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zygis@darq.net) by farnborough.darq.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952F91D0E5 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:37:57 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <478C8CEF.9090409@darq.net> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:37:35 +0000 From: Jim Bow User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071004) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: mail from: field question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:37:44 -0000 Ian Smith wrote: > paqi# alias um > tty;id -p;who am i > paqi# um > /dev/ttyp3 > login smithi > uid root > groups wheel operator network > root ttyp3 Jan 11 14:09 > > Note 'id -p' showing 'login smithi'; see id(1) .. I gather that sendmail > must also use getlogin(2) - which value does not appear in `env` - when > sending mail from an su'd session, as opposed to an original root login, Yes, I think you've hit the nail on the head there. > > The actual thing Im trying to do is to email something from a script > > that runs as root from devd, but I run into the same problem of the > > email arriving from somebody other than root, hence trying this manually > > on the command line. > > Is 'somebody other than root' consistent, and someone who's logged in, > perhaps before su'ing and then starting the session that invokes devd? 'somebody other than root' is the same user each time. They are not logged in at the time the script runs, but do own some active processes (most notably screen). > > There is definitely something that I am overlooking, but what is it? I'm > > extremely curious to work-out why I'm seeing such behavior as its > > defeating all my expectations so far. > I noticed later that Paul gets a different result .. maybe postfix as > mentioned Postfix doesn't seem to be affected by the same issue and works as one would expect when run from command line and devd. I've also tried using nullmailer and that works ok too. Seems that sendmail's workings were responsible for the confusion. I'm going to be replacing it with nullmailer on all machines. Thanks for all your help, Jim Bow From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 11:07:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6309B16A419 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:07:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mneumann@ntecs.de) Received: from core.ntecs.de (213-239-223-123.clients.your-server.de [213.239.223.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B18B213C442 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:07:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mneumann@ntecs.de) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by core.ntecs.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C47D532134; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:34:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from core.ntecs.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (core.ntecs.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 95139-01; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:34:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.24] (krlh-4dbd0dfc.pool.einsundeins.de [77.189.13.252]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by core.ntecs.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665EB2DF82; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:34:42 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <478C8D24.70406@ntecs.de> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:38:28 +0100 From: Michael Neumann User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071203) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: gmane.os.freebsd.questions To: nicolas@nicoelro.net References: <478C74B4.4070408@nicoelro.net> In-Reply-To: <478C74B4.4070408@nicoelro.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntecs.de Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Very bad performances with wpi driver and 7.0-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:07:37 -0000 Nicolas Letellier wrote: > Hello, > > I use FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 with my laptop (Asustek A6000 Series). > Performances with wpi are very very bad: in my LAN, I download a file at > 4 k/s. In Internet, I would believe I use a 56 k connection :-) > > In this laptop, I have a NIC (chipset re), and I don't have any problem > with. The connection is very very stable. The problem is juste with wpi > and my Wireless NIC. > > I test OpenBSD-current, and I didn't have any problem with wpi. The > problem is juste with FreeBSD 7.0-RC1. I have any firewalls, nothing. > All is perfect with my NIC re. > > I test with GENERIC, and I build my own kernel (with wpi support build > into kernel). The problem is the same. > > See more informations here: > > numenor# cat /boot/loader.conf nvidia_load="YES" > wpifw_load="YES" > legal.intel_wpi.license_ack=1 > > numenor# cat /etc/rc.conf defaultrouter="192.168.1.249" > hostname="numenor.********" > ifconfig_wpi0="inet 192.168.1.4 ssid Nicoelro_Wifi" > numenor# ifconfig wpi0 > wpi0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 > ether 00:13:02:dd:05:5f > inet 192.168.1.4 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (OFDM/36Mbps) > status: associated > ssid Nicoelro_Wifi channel 10 (2457 Mhz 11g) bssid 00:0f:b5:b9:9f:cc > authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpower 50 bmiss 7 scanvalid 60 > protmode CTS > > > Sometimes, I see this message: > wpi0: discard frame w/o packet header > > numenor# sysctl -a | grep wpi > net.wlan.0.%parent: wpi0 > debug.wpi: 0 > dev.wpi.0.%desc: Intel(R) PRO/Wireless 3945ABG > dev.wpi.0.%driver: wpi > dev.wpi.0.%location: slot=0 function=0 handle=\_SB_.PCI0.P0P7.WLAN > dev.wpi.0.%pnpinfo: vendor=0x8086 device=0x4222 subvendor=0x8086 > subdevice=0x1001 class=0x028000 > dev.wpi.0.%parent: pci3 > > > numenor# dmesg > *Copyright (c) 1992-2008 The FreeBSD Project. > Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 > The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. > FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. > FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 #1: Mon Jan 14 18:12:58 CET 2008 > root@numenor.nicoelro.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NUMENOR > Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 > CPU: Genuine Intel(R) CPU T2300 @ 1.66GHz (1662.52-MHz > 686-class CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6e8 Stepping = 8 > > Features=0xbfe9fbff > > Features2=0xc189 > AMD Features=0x100000 > Cores per package: 2 > real memory = 1073545216 (1023 MB) > avail memory = 1032773632 (984 MB) > ACPI APIC Table: > FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs > cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 > cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 > ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard > kbd1 at kbdmux0 > hptrr: HPT RocketRAID controller driver v1.1 (Jan 14 2008 18:12:38) > acpi0: on motherboard > acpi0: [ITHREAD] > acpi0: Power Button (fixed) > acpi0: reservation of 0, a0000 (3) failed > acpi0: reservation of 100000, 3ff00000 (3) failed > Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 > acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x808-0x80b on acpi0 > acpi_ec0: port 0x62,0x66 on acpi0 > cpu0: on acpi0 > est0: on cpu0 > est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized. > est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr 6130a2c06000613 > device_attach: est0 attach returned 6 > p4tcc0: on cpu0 > cpu1: on acpi0 > ACPI Warning (tbutils-0243): Incorrect checksum in table [SSDT] - D6, > should be 9C [20070320] > est1: on cpu1 > p4tcc1: on cpu1 > pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 > pci0: on pcib0 > pcib1: irq 16 at device 1.0 on pci0 > pci1: on pcib1 > nvidia0: mem > 0xfd000000-0xfdffffff,0xc0000000-0xcfffffff,0xfc000000-0xfcffffff irq 16 > at device 0.0 on pci1 > nvidia0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > nvidia0: [ITHREAD] > pcm0: mem > 0xfebfc000-0xfebfffff irq 21 at device 27.0 on pci0 > pcm0: [ITHREAD] > pcib2: irq 16 at device 28.0 on pci0 > pci2: on pcib2 > re0: port 0xc800-0xc8ff mem > 0xfe0ff000-0xfe0fffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci2 > re0: Using 2 MSI messages > miibus0: on re0 > rgephy0: PHY 1 on miibus0 > rgephy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, > 1000baseT-FDX, auto > re0: Ethernet address: 00:18:f3:5b:f6:31 > re0: [FILTER] > re0: [FILTER] > pcib3: irq 19 at device 28.3 on pci0 > pci3: on pcib3 > wpi0: mem 0xfe1ff000-0xfe1fffff irq 19 > at device 0.0 on pci3 > bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. > bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. > bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. > bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. > bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. > bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. > bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. > bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. > bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. > bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. > bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. > bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. > bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. > bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. > bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. > bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. > bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. > bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. > bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. > bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. > bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. > bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. > bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. > bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. > bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. > bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. > bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. > bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. > bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. > bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. > bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly. > wpi0: Ethernet address: 00:13:02:dd:05:5f > wpi0: [ITHREAD] > wpi0: 11a rates: 6Mbps 9Mbps 12Mbps 18Mbps 24Mbps 36Mbps 48Mbps 54Mbps > wpi0: 11b rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps > wpi0: 11g rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps 6Mbps 9Mbps 12Mbps 18Mbps > 24Mbps 36Mbps 48Mbps 54Mbps > uhci0: port 0xec00-0xec1f irq 23 at > device 29.0 on pci0 > uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > uhci0: [ITHREAD] > usb0: on uhci0 > usb0: USB revision 1.0 > uhub0: on usb0 > uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > uhci1: port 0xe880-0xe89f irq 19 at > device 29.1 on pci0 > uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] > uhci1: [ITHREAD] > usb1: on uhci1 > usb1: USB revision 1.0 > uhub1: on usb1 > uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > uhci2: port 0xe800-0xe81f irq 18 at > device 29.2 on pci0 > uhci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] > uhci2: [ITHREAD] > usb2: on uhci2 > usb2: USB revision 1.0 > uhub2: on usb2 > uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > uhci3: port 0xe480-0xe49f irq 22 at > device 29.3 on pci0 > uhci3: [GIANT-LOCKED] > uhci3: [ITHREAD] > usb3: on uhci3 > usb3: USB revision 1.0 > uhub3: on usb3 > uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > ehci0: mem > 0xfebfbc00-0xfebfbfff irq 23 at device 29.7 on pci0 > ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > ehci0: [ITHREAD] > usb4: EHCI version 1.0 > usb4: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2 usb3 > usb4: on ehci0 > usb4: USB revision 2.0 > uhub4: on usb4 > uhub4: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered > ugen0: on uhub4 > pcib4: at device 30.0 on pci0 > pci4: on pcib4 > pci4: at device 1.0 (no driver attached) > pci4: at device 1.1 (no driver attached) > pci4: at device 1.2 (no driver attached) > pci4: at device 1.3 (no driver attached) > isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 > isa0: on isab0 > atapci0: port > 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xffa0-0xffaf at device 31.1 on pci0 > ata0: on atapci0 > ata0: [ITHREAD] > ata1: on atapci0 > ata1: [ITHREAD] > acpi_lid0: on acpi0 > acpi_button0: on acpi0 > acpi_button1: on acpi0 > acpi_tz0: on acpi0 > acpi_acad0: on acpi0 > battery0: on acpi0 > atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 > atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 > kbd0 at atkbd0 > atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > atkbd0: [ITHREAD] > psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 > psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > psm0: [ITHREAD] > psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3 > pmtimer0 on isa0 > orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xcefff pnpid ORM0000 on isa0 > ppc0: parallel port not found. > sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 > sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> > vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 > ums0: on > uhub0 > ums0: 3 buttons and Z dir. > Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec > hptrr: no controller detected. > ad0: 95396MB at ata0-master UDMA100 > acd0: DVDR at ata0-slave UDMA33 > pcm0: > pcm0: > SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! > GEOM_LABEL: Label for provider ad0s1 is msdosfs/RECOVERY. > GEOM_LABEL: Label for provider ad0s2 is ntfs/Syst\M-hme. > GEOM_LABEL: Label for provider ad0s5 is msdosfs/ . > Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s3a > * > > Am is alone with this performance problem? I cannot use wpi driver in > these conditions, so I use re driver for my NIC. I had similar problems. *Very* slow and unstable connection using wpi0. And WPA never worked. I tried it with NetBSD 4.0 (just out of curiosity) and it was working very stable and fast (even WPA)! I was running FreeBSD-7.0 RC3 and now -CURRENT. In both cases no success, so that I don't use wpi0 at all right now. Regards, Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 11:47:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D7616A420 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:47:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gahr@gahr.ch) Received: from cpanel03.rubas-s03.net (cpanel03.rubas-s03.net [195.182.222.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 484A813C46E for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:47:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gahr@gahr.ch) Received: from 80-218-191-236.dclient.hispeed.ch ([80.218.191.236] helo=gahrtop.localhost) by cpanel03.rubas-s03.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JEkGe-0007CQ-7S; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:47:44 +0100 Message-ID: <478C9D2D.40106@gahr.ch> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:46:53 +0100 From: Pietro Cerutti User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071121) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Neumann References: <478C74B4.4070408@nicoelro.net> <478C8D24.70406@ntecs.de> In-Reply-To: <478C8D24.70406@ntecs.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 OpenPGP: id=9571F78E; url=http://www.gahr.ch/pgp Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig96C73A89E12084A123261CA4" X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cpanel03.rubas-s03.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - gahr.ch X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: nicolas@nicoelro.net, FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Very bad performances with wpi driver and 7.0-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:47:46 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig96C73A89E12084A123261CA4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Michael Neumann wrote: >=20 > I had similar problems. *Very* slow and unstable connection using wpi0.= > And WPA never worked. I tried it with NetBSD 4.0 (just out of curiosity= ) > and it was working very stable and fast (even WPA)! >=20 > I was running FreeBSD-7.0 RC3 and now -CURRENT. In both cases no > success, so that I don't use wpi0 at all right now. I also had problems with WPA using the -CURRENT and -STABLE versions. Try out the 20071102 perforce snapshot, available from [1]. It works fine here (including WPA). [1] http://people.freebsd.org/~benjsc/downloads/wpi/ >=20 > Regards, >=20 > Michael --=20 Pietro Cerutti PGP Public Key: http://gahr.ch/pgp --------------enig96C73A89E12084A123261CA4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHjJ0xwMJqmJVx944RCsgoAJ4xHNhuXKeGzNN6KXyS+5eoZZZVnQCfeXzw RsP1aNmT753Ae8EKuLG5dHw= =LnOI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig96C73A89E12084A123261CA4-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 12:00:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E8916A4BF for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:00:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dzalewski@open-craft.com) Received: from srv.open-craft.com (srv.open-craft.com [205.209.147.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA6313C45D for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:00:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dzalewski@open-craft.com) Received: from [196.218.200.202] (helo=[10.0.0.11]) by srv.open-craft.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JEk6c-0004D1-Nv for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:37:24 -0500 From: Dominik Zalewski To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: OpenCraft Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:37:15 +0200 Message-Id: <1200397035.5681.22.camel@polonium.opencraft.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - srv.open-craft.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - open-craft.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: FreeBSD 6.1 php5 cli core dumped X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dzalewski@open-craft.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:00:11 -0000 Dear All, I'm using FreeBSD 6.1 i386 and I'm having problem with php5-cli . When I try to run php myscript.php I'm getting: Segmentation fault: 11 (core dumped) Script runs fine under a web browser. The problem is only when running php from command line. Some people suggested that I should change module order in extensions.ini . I played a bit but it didn't help. Here is my extensions.ini : extension=session.so extension=json.so extension=php_mapscript.so extension=ctype.so extension=ldap.so extension=curl.so extension=ftp.so extension=gd.so extension=iconv.so extension=mbstring.so extension=mysql.so extension=pcre.so extension=simplexml.so extension=tokenizer.so extension=xml.so extension=zlib.so Installed php5 ports: php5-5.2.5 PHP Scripting Language php5-ctype-5.2.5 The ctype shared extension for php php5-curl-5.2.5 The curl shared extension for php php5-ftp-5.2.5 The ftp shared extension for php php5-gd-5.2.5 The gd shared extension for php php5-iconv-5.2.5 The iconv shared extension for php php5-ldap-5.2.5 The ldap shared extension for php php5-mbstring-5.2.5 The mbstring shared extension for php php5-mysql-5.2.5 The mysql shared extension for php php5-pcre-5.2.5 The pcre shared extension for php php5-session-5.2.5 The session shared extension for php php5-simplexml-5.2.5 The simplexml shared extension for php php5-tokenizer-5.2.5 The tokenizer shared extension for php php5-xml-5.2.5 The xml shared extension for php php5-zlib-5.2.5 The zlib shared extension for php Regards, Dominik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 12:20:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E707616A417 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:20:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@boosten.org) Received: from smtpq1.groni1.gr.home.nl (smtpq1.groni1.gr.home.nl [213.51.130.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C028D13C4CC for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:20:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@boosten.org) Received: from [213.51.130.190] (port=57596 helo=smtp1.groni1.gr.home.nl) by smtpq1.groni1.gr.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JEkmB-000159-E1 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:20:19 +0100 Received: from cp268254-a.landg1.lb.home.nl ([84.25.65.88]:4873 helo=ra.egypt.nl) by smtp1.groni1.gr.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JEkmA-0001Co-7o for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:20:19 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (xp.egypt.nl [192.168.13.35]) by ra.egypt.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4316C39885 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:20:17 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <478CA500.5040302@boosten.org> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:20:16 +0100 From: Peter Boosten User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080114-3, 01/14/2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Subject: My local time seems to be out of sync X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:20:21 -0000 Anyone seen this (the date...)? /usr/ports/UPDATING: 20080118: p10 FreeBSD-SA-08:01.pty, FreeBSD-SA-08:02.libc Fix issues which allow snooping on ptys. [08:01] Fix an off-by-one error in inet_network(3). [08:02] Peter -- http://www.boosten.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 12:42:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBCDA16A418 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:42:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swb@grasslake.net) Received: from accord.grasslake.net (accord.grasslake.net [209.98.56.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B1B713C442 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:42:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swb@grasslake.net) Received: from [192.168.1.44] (quattro.grasslake.net [192.168.1.44]) by accord.grasslake.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0FCdrc6088369 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:39:53 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from swb@grasslake.net) Message-ID: <478CAA3C.3030802@grasslake.net> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:42:36 -0600 From: Shawn Barnhart Organization: Managed Chaos User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD References: <478BB12E.3030302@grasslake.net> <478C2B00.9020304@hdk5.net> In-Reply-To: <478C2B00.9020304@hdk5.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Trendnet TEG-PCITXR hw rev 3.0 & re driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:42:38 -0000 NetOpsCenter wrote: > I have 5 of the nic cards TEG PCI TXR running on Various versions of > 7. * and 8.* of FreeBSD. > There was somebody on the weekind also having trouble with version 6.* > Same as your problem. > Try switch to 7.* At this point, switching to 7.* isn't really an option and its loads easier to just switch to a better NIC. Out of curiosity, what does the 7.* driver do that the 6.* doesn't and why hasn't it been backported? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 12:45:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3651216A469 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:45:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA4413C461 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:45:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so3637841pyb.10 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:45:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=YYTV05y6ddB6NVqAUrLn9uhrLNBGLcmjPHgW/QpY9CU=; b=g7aawvuz1uFjDC4L3AnQklP6YE3DXa4W9rR7JxwE/IERMh/uEkViQruBVt3t1G9VygftLQ7b1r98GcWaDcd+ocneMr9MgDnIMZbg96XZlfhbf1LfJ0r55P9C6FTGlIpiItk0Mm8JrHhjAP96cBMZavFpgMnc+g6tmUAovTRAcrw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=IeWq4t+wXm3NXoaBh4X9iDK461lfQRaBxTn4L61kOVEH+T4XM9BpRAHh4P3AI/IkIiMGXCDCiFcb8ID5hshfoKl18zTHRuROtALqrzswXDdrqLmtpgIr6xmifP8AfibDxjK/p/5vUwv024Q/MLkMjPCoQJBEG99ZdRK+8bIsuD8= Received: by 10.64.196.9 with SMTP id t9mr17162795qbf.78.1200401157490; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:45:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.112.7 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:45:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:45:57 -0500 From: "Aryeh Friedman" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Shrinking a partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:45:59 -0000 After installing FreeBSD and Vista (463 GB and 30 GB respectivally) I found out I don't have enough free space on my 500 GB drive on the vista partition. How do I determine how much I can shrink the FreeBSD partition by safely (by just moving the end sector in fdisk(1))? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 13:28:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0812916A41A for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:28:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trey@fastmail.fm) Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com (out3.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0460813C467 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:28:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trey@fastmail.fm) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.internal [10.202.2.42]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A3289F6A for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:10:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from web5.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.214]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:10:58 -0500 Received: by web5.messagingengine.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 2AB165FE28; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:10:58 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1200402658.23101.1231331249@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: fyW/U8kXgrPQTWwu7ESNiAIXLN6dyfUrzKlD7GTTHVdG 1200402658 From: "Trey Sizemore" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:10:58 -0500 Subject: Downloading ports tree again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:28:02 -0000 I have used portsnap to download the ports tree. Recently, I've removed /usr/ports/* and now need to download the ports tree again. However, running portnap fetch results in: "Ports tree hasn't changed since last snapshot No updates needed" How can I 'reset' portsnap and get the ports tree again? Thanks! -- Trey Sizemore trey@fastmail.fm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 13:39:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D09816A41A for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:39:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.77]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 161E313C45B for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:39:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from joshua.ath.cx (athedsl-323623.home.otenet.gr [85.72.119.197]) (authenticated bits=0) by kane.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m0FDdEP6027043; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:39:14 +0200 Message-ID: <478CB781.5040809@otenet.gr> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:39:13 +0200 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080108) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Trey Sizemore References: <1200402658.23101.1231331249@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <1200402658.23101.1231331249@webmail.messagingengine.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Downloading ports tree again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:39:19 -0000 Trey Sizemore wrote: > I have used portsnap to download the ports tree. Recently, I've removed > /usr/ports/* and now need to download the ports tree again. > > However, running portnap fetch results in: > "Ports tree hasn't changed since last snapshot > No updates needed" > > How can I 'reset' portsnap and get the ports tree again? > > Thanks! > I would first try a "portsnap extract" and see if this extracts the whole ports tree again (from what I understand from the man page, it will) Otherwise, portsnap saves its state in /var/db/portsnap. You could try deleting the files in there. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 13:45:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EF6D16A41B for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:45:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikola.lecic@anthesphoria.net) Received: from anthesphoria.net (anthesphoria.net [200.46.204.219]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 597A413C45B for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:45:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikola.lecic@anthesphoria.net) X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.4.1 anthesphoria.net m0FDj81O063791 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=anthesphoria.net; s=phero; t=1200404719; bh=Nbo9x1vl0PedSg3eQxMr9L9jZqUtHgtDhl8FhXGRA 5Y=; l=2099; h=X-Bogosity:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:X-Face:X-Operating-System: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=tCnHxGknYt4 g0LGlhP+U7hvW9oR54l+3FDKSdD6IoeJlolEfUyItHvnr1qOhSDws4XbBzBdgYLrTIN WR9smKhUCx9Q1ulpzbc7Mf/LVs/UmPGg0eDrFsCeDGcxGtJlX8wc1tFntMnfyahD2rX NOUrEkx1OjtzdMDOjtC3CeGZuA= Received: from anthesphoria.net (adsl-198-212.eunet.yu [213.198.198.212]) (authenticated bits=0) by anthesphoria.net (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0FDj81O063791 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:45:13 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from nikola.lecic@anthesphoria.net) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:45:08 +0100 From: Nikola =?UTF-8?B?TGXEjWnEhw==?= To: "Nerius Landys" Message-ID: <20080115144508.204f0c77@anthesphoria.net> In-Reply-To: <560f92640801142157n7194be23u8c4eac084ed474c9@mail.gmail.com> References: <560f92640801142157n7194be23u8c4eac084ed474c9@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.1.0 (GTK+ 2.12.4; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) X-Face: pbl6-.[$G'Fi(Ogs2xlXP-V6{3||$Y[LOYs&~GJoikj'cVjcFC[V7du;;0~6nO= [Vi2?uU1Pq~,=Adj@,T:|"`$AF~il]J.Nz#2pU',Y7.{B;m/?{#sO^Dvo$rnmY6] X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p8 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: sysinstall and bsdlabel/boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:45:20 -0000 On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:57:49 -0800 "Nerius Landys" wrote: > I was trying to install 7.0RC1 (hope it's OK to post this here, > because I believe that older versions of FreeBSD have this same > limitation) and came across a gotcha. I had an MBR on disk that I > wanted to keep. It was Lilo and all it did was boot a selected > slice, it was configured to function the same as FreeBSD's `boot0'. > So, the install of FreeBSD came to the area where it asks what to do > with the MBR. There are three choices: 1) boot manager, 2) simple > MBR, and 3) do nothing. I chose to do nothing because I wanted to > keep Lilo in the MBR. But, by choosing this option, I expected > sysinstall to install the /boot/boot code to the beginning of the > FreeBSD slice. Well, no such boot code was installed, apparently, > unless I totally missed something. Basically, after the install, > when I delegated Lilo to boot the chosen [FreeBSD] slice, it did not > find any boot code on that slice. Have you configured lilo properly? In the past, I used to use something like this: other=/dev/hda2 table=/dev/hda loader=/boot/chain.b label=FreeBSD (Actually, you can delete "loader=/boot/chain.b" since FreeBSD and Linux share the same disk in your case -- and I assume you use lilo to dual-boot Linux and FreeBSD.) > My workaround for this was to choose option 1) boot manager. I ended > up using boot0 (the boot manager) which I feel is superior to Lilo > because it is more modular, simpler. However, some users may not > want this. I didn't find any option in sysinstall to install just > the /boot/boot code to the beginning of the FreeBSD slice. Am I > missing something? You don't have to go through sysinstall. Just for the case, reinstall bootstrap code of your FreeBSD slice (say, ad0s1): # bsdlabel -B /dev/ad0s1 (the code will come from /boot/boot by default), and then reinstall lilo from Linux, with the aforementioned configuration. Best regards. -- Nikola Lečić :: Никола Лечић From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 13:49:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6EAE16A417 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:49:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jalmberg@identry.com) Received: from mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.4.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4F313C474 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:49:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jalmberg@identry.com) Received: from [192.168.1.110] (ool-4b7f8e42.static.optonline.net [75.127.142.66]) by mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTP id <0JUO00HNXUD5XOH0@mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:48:43 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:48:32 -0500 From: John Almberg In-reply-to: <200801150237.m0F2bqEg000116@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <360AB6AE-B3C1-4CA6-AFC1-378B48B3C6DF@identry.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <87A9631B-EAC5-41B8-B4C2-001C3ADBA486@identry.com> <200801150237.m0F2bqEg000116@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Subject: Re: No spam??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:49:03 -0000 I've been doing some more digging since my last post, and have figured out that the spam is not being blocked by pf, as I suspected (since it wasn't showing up in my spam folder), but by spamassassin blacklists. The smtp log file has lots of entries like: 2008-01-14 09:30:37.074087500 rblsmtpd: 123.20.89.67 pid 72121: 451 http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=123.20.89.67 2008-01-14 09:31:05.271514500 rblsmtpd: 58.227.241.97 pid 72122: 451 Dynamic IP Addresses See: http://www.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml? 58.227.241.97 2008-01-14 09:31:17.404943500 rblsmtpd: 41.196.155.56 pid 72123: 451 http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=41.196.155.56 2008-01-14 09:31:18.304682500 rblsmtpd: 123.20.89.67 pid 72124: 451 http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=123.20.89.67 So raises the same point that Oliver makes: how trustworthy are these blacklists? -- John On Jan 14, 2008, at 9:37 PM, Olivier Nicole wrote: >> I know this is an odd thing to worry about, but is this normal? Since >> the spam doesn't even seem to be reaching spamd, I'm guessing that >> the real hero is pf, which must be blocking 99.99% of spam at the >> packet level. > > I don't know how you configured pf, but since I use the black list > fromhttp://www.sa-blacklist.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/sa- > blacklist.current.sendmail-access, > I reduced drastically the spam that reaches SpamAssassin. > > The key point with such black list is that you must trust the list, as > there is no place for false positive. > > Bests, > > Olivier > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Websites for On-line Collectible Dealers ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Identry, LLC John Almberg (631) 546-5079 jalmberg@identry.com www.identry.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 13:52:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD8916A41A for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:52:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from borafael@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB1813C45B for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:52:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from borafael@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so3674718pyb.10 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:52:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=mx+CPY4jqufts5+Ij0N2FaqCmnUDJJLr3QuSDLGpY5s=; b=qHiQb2cumapJfexQdSce0jXhKfIIpGYaVLFP+/AiR4OGFlrZQRJNJcSJZrzrFT06gEWewcmT48cgu1aIt3FeTSgp+vhnf7kMJ5Zoa4q5uNce3s70z3GDcWc0YLSxK1+TFQxFRvcmwO5ARoQ++2iP3Cvc/t79PVK4XoXHLAA9jo0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=rciFo7V6f/5FCTpnYJ3JmBOemuwOmw0+93Od0KkwvXEwPF5J8dK3SdlCAnIhY6K7ZYWV8mypn/WX7Jweg2TRDWBeNiwAT+i1fd5JOIcLktPdCEnq0kwNBqof15kBachoSKsPhuBBMnIhMK1MlbapIm3khn8cW9YaVksr6Y/DSxw= Received: by 10.65.233.16 with SMTP id k16mr17181830qbr.43.1200403543336; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:25:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.152.11 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:25:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:25:43 -0300 From: "Rafael Barrera Oro" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Upgrading Bind9 safely using portupgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:52:27 -0000 Which is the best way to upgrade bind9 using portupgrade without setting anything on fire? I have two FreeBSDs which act as master and slave DNS (not installed by me), should i upgrade both bind's before they can work again? should i kill bind before upgrading? I'm sorry if any of my questions has an obvoius answer but i really don't know the first thing about FreeBSD and really want to get to know it better. Thanks in advance Rafael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 14:04:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7915616A421 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:04:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikola.lecic@anthesphoria.net) Received: from anthesphoria.net (anthesphoria.net [200.46.204.219]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DB9613C4E9 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:04:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikola.lecic@anthesphoria.net) X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.4.1 anthesphoria.net m0FE4iuf073442 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=anthesphoria.net; s=phero; t=1200405889; bh=/+YW6fFVxQ8OPkbK52ZB+wMXdEZ6SJH+S2p/u+PU8 +U=; l=1165; h=X-Bogosity:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:X-Face:X-Operating-System: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=acQglYJvuak SGFRNj9ahDYCP73E8vmGt/nNRLdXUA2Xa4D+Tvp/X+vk0cuv0MNmcxBb3evggdT8ogG w4X4NysfdkLdXAFCyYQl2N8TROrHorFn0SIo5UdkaTIXTMKf18nrD9EA4TFc8n5phCM eTZs2YrGeb3bI/2e6al7Rpqmec= Received: from anthesphoria.net (adsl-198-212.eunet.yu [213.198.198.212]) (authenticated bits=0) by anthesphoria.net (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0FE4iuf073442 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:04:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from nikola.lecic@anthesphoria.net) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:04:44 +0100 From: Nikola =?UTF-8?B?TGXEjWnEhw==?= To: John Almberg Message-ID: <20080115150444.6ae88e33@anthesphoria.net> In-Reply-To: <360AB6AE-B3C1-4CA6-AFC1-378B48B3C6DF@identry.com> References: <87A9631B-EAC5-41B8-B4C2-001C3ADBA486@identry.com> <200801150237.m0F2bqEg000116@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <360AB6AE-B3C1-4CA6-AFC1-378B48B3C6DF@identry.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.1.0 (GTK+ 2.12.4; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) X-Face: pbl6-.[$G'Fi(Ogs2xlXP-V6{3||$Y[LOYs&~GJoikj'cVjcFC[V7du;;0~6nO= [Vi2?uU1Pq~,=Adj@,T:|"`$AF~il]J.Nz#2pU',Y7.{B;m/?{#sO^Dvo$rnmY6] X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p8 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: No spam??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:04:52 -0000 On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:48:32 -0500 John Almberg wrote: > The smtp log file has lots of entries like: > > 2008-01-14 09:30:37.074087500 rblsmtpd: 123.20.89.67 pid 72121: 451 > http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=123.20.89.67 > 2008-01-14 09:31:05.271514500 rblsmtpd: 58.227.241.97 pid 72122: 451 > Dynamic IP Addresses See: http://www.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml? > 58.227.241.97 > 2008-01-14 09:31:17.404943500 rblsmtpd: 41.196.155.56 pid 72123: 451 > http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=41.196.155.56 > 2008-01-14 09:31:18.304682500 rblsmtpd: 123.20.89.67 pid 72124: 451 > http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=123.20.89.67 > > So raises the same point that Oliver makes: how trustworthy are > these blacklists? Search this lists' archives, you'll find that FreeBSD mail servers used to be blacklisted by Sorbs on several occasions in the past... In May 2007, after intervention, Sorbs man eventually admitted that they blacklisted FreeBSD server "by accident": http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2007-May/041520.html Very trustworthy. :-) -- Nikola Lečić :: Никола Лечић From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 14:56:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5155916A468 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:56:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamesh@lanl.gov) Received: from mailwasher.lanl.gov (mailwasher.lanl.gov [204.121.3.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB2E13C459 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:56:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamesh@lanl.gov) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mailwasher.lanl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3587EEC8464; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:56:02 -0700 (MST) X-CTN5-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mailwasher.lanl.gov Received: from mailwasher.lanl.gov (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mailwasher.lanl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B77EC8462; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:56:02 -0700 (MST) Received: from mailrelay1.lanl.gov (mailrelay1.lanl.gov [128.165.4.101]) by mailwasher.lanl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19595EC83AC; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:56:02 -0700 (MST) Received: from oppie-mail.lanl.gov (oppie-mail.lanl.gov [128.165.4.123]) by mailrelay1.lanl.gov (8.13.8/8.13.8/(ccn-5)) with ESMTP id m0FEu1WZ003860; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:56:01 -0700 Received: from [128.165.86.60] (p25dual1.lanl.gov [128.165.86.60]) by oppie-mail.lanl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 296001F8002; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:55:57 -0700 (MST) From: James Harrison To: Aryeh Friedman In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Los Alamos National Labs Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:55:56 -0700 Message-Id: <1200408956.619.59.camel@p25dual1.lanl.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.0 (2.8.0-33.0.1.el5) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CTN-5-MailScanner-Information: Please see http://network.lanl.gov/email/virus-scan.php X-CTN-5-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CTN-5-MailScanner-From: jamesh@lanl.gov X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shrinking a partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jamesh@lanl.gov List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:56:03 -0000 On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 07:45 -0500, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > After installing FreeBSD and Vista (463 GB and 30 GB respectivally) I > found out I don't have enough free space on my 500 GB drive on the > vista partition. How do I determine how much I can shrink the > FreeBSD partition by safely (by just moving the end sector in > fdisk(1))? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I'd imagine that you could use the output of df -h to see how much you're using on the /usr partition and then shrink appropriately. Best James From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 15:21:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B5816A419 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:21:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swb@grasslake.net) Received: from accord.grasslake.net (accord.grasslake.net [209.98.56.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00D5413C4E7 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:21:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swb@grasslake.net) Received: from [192.168.1.44] (quattro.grasslake.net [192.168.1.44]) by accord.grasslake.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0FFIMpY007901 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:18:22 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from swb@grasslake.net) Message-ID: <478CCF61.3060404@grasslake.net> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:21:05 -0600 From: Shawn Barnhart Organization: Managed Chaos User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <478BB12E.3030302@grasslake.net> <478C2B00.9020304@hdk5.net> In-Reply-To: <478C2B00.9020304@hdk5.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Trendnet TEG-PCITXR hw rev 3.0 & re driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:21:07 -0000 NetOpsCenter wrote: > I have 5 of the nic cards TEG PCI TXR running on Various versions of > 7. * and 8.* of FreeBSD. > There was somebody on the weekind also having trouble with version 6.* > Same as your problem. > Try switch to 7.* Now I see why -- the code looks way overhauled recently (like hours ago) and the RELENG_6 version doesn't have any of these fixes. Anyone know if or when they will be MFC'd? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 15:45:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBEEE16A473 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:45:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BF8613C4D5 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:45:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from epia-2.farid-hajji.net (epia-2 [192.168.254.11]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 327B5DFD13; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:45:28 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:45:27 +0100 From: cpghost To: John Almberg Message-ID: <20080115154527.GA15932@epia-2.farid-hajji.net> References: <87A9631B-EAC5-41B8-B4C2-001C3ADBA486@identry.com> <200801150237.m0F2bqEg000116@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <360AB6AE-B3C1-4CA6-AFC1-378B48B3C6DF@identry.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <360AB6AE-B3C1-4CA6-AFC1-378B48B3C6DF@identry.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No spam??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:45:31 -0000 On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 08:48:32AM -0500, John Almberg wrote: > I've been doing some more digging since my last post, and have figured out > that the spam is not being blocked by pf, as I suspected (since it wasn't > showing up in my spam folder), but by spamassassin blacklists. > > The smtp log file has lots of entries like: > > 2008-01-14 09:30:37.074087500 rblsmtpd: 123.20.89.67 pid 72121: 451 > http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=123.20.89.67 > 2008-01-14 09:31:05.271514500 rblsmtpd: 58.227.241.97 pid 72122: 451 > Dynamic IP Addresses See: http://www.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?58.227.241.97 > 2008-01-14 09:31:17.404943500 rblsmtpd: 41.196.155.56 pid 72123: 451 > http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=41.196.155.56 > 2008-01-14 09:31:18.304682500 rblsmtpd: 123.20.89.67 pid 72124: 451 > http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=123.20.89.67 > > So raises the same point that Oliver makes: how trustworthy are these > blacklists? YMMV, of course! I'm using spamhaus.org's blacklists for quite some time (many years) to block spam in postfix and they've been VERY trustworthy so far. But I can't say the same for the others, which seem occasionally a little bit too eager/aggressive and accumulate way too many false positives. -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 16:04:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8951716A421 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:04:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.78.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1813613C465 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:04:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id A98702844C; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:04:20 -0500 (EST) To: cpghost References: <87A9631B-EAC5-41B8-B4C2-001C3ADBA486@identry.com> <200801150237.m0F2bqEg000116@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <360AB6AE-B3C1-4CA6-AFC1-378B48B3C6DF@identry.com> <20080115154527.GA15932@epia-2.farid-hajji.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:04:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20080115154527.GA15932@epia-2.farid-hajji.net> (cpghost@cordula.ws's message of "Tue\, 15 Jan 2008 16\:45\:27 +0100") Message-ID: <44bq7noz23.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: John Almberg , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No spam??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:04:22 -0000 cpghost writes: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 08:48:32AM -0500, John Almberg wrote: >> I've been doing some more digging since my last post, and have figured out >> that the spam is not being blocked by pf, as I suspected (since it wasn't >> showing up in my spam folder), but by spamassassin blacklists. >> >> The smtp log file has lots of entries like: >> >> 2008-01-14 09:30:37.074087500 rblsmtpd: 123.20.89.67 pid 72121: 451 >> http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=123.20.89.67 >> 2008-01-14 09:31:05.271514500 rblsmtpd: 58.227.241.97 pid 72122: 451 >> Dynamic IP Addresses See: http://www.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?58.227.241.97 >> 2008-01-14 09:31:17.404943500 rblsmtpd: 41.196.155.56 pid 72123: 451 >> http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=41.196.155.56 >> 2008-01-14 09:31:18.304682500 rblsmtpd: 123.20.89.67 pid 72124: 451 >> http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=123.20.89.67 >> >> So raises the same point that Oliver makes: how trustworthy are these >> blacklists? > > YMMV, of course! > > I'm using spamhaus.org's blacklists for quite some time (many years) > to block spam in postfix and they've been VERY trustworthy so far. > > But I can't say the same for the others, which seem occasionally a > little bit too eager/aggressive and accumulate way too many false > positives. The OP was using spamassassin, which can score a mail as more likely to be spam based on an RBL. This makes even an untrustworthy RBL useful while still protecting yourself against its mistakes. For example, I use spamhaus blacklists in postfix myself, but I let messages come in from SORBS-blacklisted sites. Then the messages will get a point or two (of 4 or 5 needed to be marked as spam) as a result of the SORBS blacklist. At least, I think I've got the list names correct; I haven't touched my configurations for either postfix or spamassassin in quite a while. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 16:15:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0952616A420 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:15:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.152]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9127013C4D9 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:15:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so3028111fgg.35 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:15:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=Yv7viLdAJlnsBiKxqYnEIb3uIsTXII8CDUitgUI2gNQ=; b=fOcbYN8A7VvYoK18OzYt3DwkpTgG6Wu7wh8hDkI1oYIKJ80WX7TxtarT6xI9ffMIkwIRdGYu44iBzQdfnD+EB9A7AVGOYKFDHGpuPYL4jjJQOaGAFEiggoP83C5ayNcsU6ewWYACVdIHCzFW32KnQuCr/31wwhQFIfyJ8HR0V1Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=dcApCwePG0hf7LWCizpl2L03CaN+Q5uDVDX7EgWank2rvF9dIzZNLbSEYCWSn8+6UNOSwTcFcyWwxBbnNzg4i0rjMmR07ERZZlR9OPiM8xk/YYcdwfK201hjbctbJ9mpdYt78b2XaP9psqlhiD3TrDIE2RDltN45cOKwyn7a/Zo= Received: by 10.82.134.12 with SMTP id h12mr13330424bud.29.1200413749958; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:15:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.159.19 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:15:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <14989d6e0801150815h3e006d45kaa7d3b91c2ae4cd0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:15:49 +0000 From: "Christian Walther" To: jamesh@lanl.gov In-Reply-To: <1200408956.619.59.camel@p25dual1.lanl.gov> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1200408956.619.59.camel@p25dual1.lanl.gov> Cc: Aryeh Friedman , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shrinking a partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:15:52 -0000 On 15/01/2008, James Harrison wrote: > On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 07:45 -0500, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > > After installing FreeBSD and Vista (463 GB and 30 GB respectivally) I > > found out I don't have enough free space on my 500 GB drive on the > > vista partition. How do I determine how much I can shrink the > > FreeBSD partition by safely (by just moving the end sector in > > fdisk(1))? > > I'd imagine that you could use the output of df -h to see how much > you're using on the /usr partition and then shrink appropriately. > AFAIK UFS (as well as other Unix FS) don't simply start writing at the beginning of a filesystem and continue until the end is reached. It's possible that data is written near the end of a filesystem nearly instantly after the first mount. To make sure that you don't loose any data I'd dump the FS to a save place and restore it afterwards using a LiveCD. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 16:17:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9569316A419 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:17:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.154]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A1DA13C468 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:17:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so3028701fgg.35 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:17:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=ukSVMGjfB8+QQQZV0JWQxhcirijGUCt6I1ykpT8MX+o=; b=i/Q4AhzWZGBH1Y/Ndp7K4aXcp678iHSd4QYAniDgGgZ+IdbT/YFfhtaLdK+uoJZmBDyg0WdYSxgXQMDWkyg9cjoP0Dz61NW83mNoLAlrLgmnBElnc2B+mTpsM0etoMIpDMUPgw/FtnN80m8AkpvveopAimufYg1eAOwPkg4gYBQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tUHPz65+JWxLKZpZU5/t0dwHaPd1oMcvnjzczQoRiGlh3keIEMN5W17Z5UuIWanj/d6XmhprM/xZ3DKmCJHhDQsgOIYJtUr1I8STdSjis5aq8+T673KMfpEvg3pwAwfiyRU53KjayVcI1Hn3wzqfQXUIjTulnfPk7v7q5q2/FGg= Received: by 10.82.159.15 with SMTP id h15mr13396075bue.36.1200413849609; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:17:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.159.19 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:17:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <14989d6e0801150817y745c396h33ed08007c4a0db2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:17:29 +0000 From: "Christian Walther" To: jamesh@lanl.gov In-Reply-To: <14989d6e0801150815h3e006d45kaa7d3b91c2ae4cd0@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1200408956.619.59.camel@p25dual1.lanl.gov> <14989d6e0801150815h3e006d45kaa7d3b91c2ae4cd0@mail.gmail.com> Cc: Aryeh Friedman , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shrinking a partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:17:31 -0000 Quoting myself: [...] > AFAIK UFS (as well as other Unix FS) don't simply start writing at the [...] Sorry, I ment FFS of course. But in fact matters are the same on both filesystems. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 16:52:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D28D16A418 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:52:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D282F13C4DD for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:52:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b2so227520nfb.33 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:52:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=RnZRwn0YMIkHqcYfZAKRnGtVaCdzAwcC4bZfMcYZx0g=; b=mOpj6M/u+Djz8U/uYgKNAN/IcnmcG4XSSmWSE8dd7QMA3S6Y4+7zXfuQZzT/LsaGV+K7fL3f/MQRkn8VY+JWZ7dHFrA5e5tzODyGGII/JKbn9Ha5o8HP/6Zz5P+5NwkR18FnYpt+Ont1bQDis8NyvRiL7fF0wCoEhbeDEDTXFm8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Tp5Jf0CGNPA8LXU80ptNsbakhS9VXwDnCfNOQuO6qsCYLjAgYKxI3WY/bIoPt/2/025320H2HM5ITkdoJ0vZ+vUxaem6CTFSA6QdpxTcw5VmQDxZZd/iRlaqkOVR44ejiXnaBMCmuYq22E0+RPrJXvMTwXpSGUwX4Lsn1rTpirk= Received: by 10.82.140.20 with SMTP id n20mr13474763bud.27.1200415946212; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:52:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.180.16 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:52:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <560f92640801150852s32ee4b24ud6b19ad8b8211f0c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:52:26 -0800 From: "Nerius Landys" To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20080115144508.204f0c77@anthesphoria.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <560f92640801142157n7194be23u8c4eac084ed474c9@mail.gmail.com> <20080115144508.204f0c77@anthesphoria.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: sysinstall and bsdlabel/boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:52:28 -0000 > > > I was trying to install 7.0RC1 (hope it's OK to post this here, > > because I believe that older versions of FreeBSD have this same > > limitation) and came across a gotcha. I had an MBR on disk that I > > wanted to keep. It was Lilo and all it did was boot a selected > > slice, it was configured to function the same as FreeBSD's `boot0'. > > So, the install of FreeBSD came to the area where it asks what to do > > with the MBR. There are three choices: 1) boot manager, 2) simple > > MBR, and 3) do nothing. I chose to do nothing because I wanted to > > keep Lilo in the MBR. But, by choosing this option, I expected > > sysinstall to install the /boot/boot code to the beginning of the > > FreeBSD slice. Well, no such boot code was installed, apparently, > > unless I totally missed something. Basically, after the install, > > when I delegated Lilo to boot the chosen [FreeBSD] slice, it did not > > find any boot code on that slice. > > Have you configured lilo properly? In the past, I used to use something > like this: > > other=/dev/hda2 > table=/dev/hda > loader=/boot/chain.b > label=FreeBSD > My complete lilo.conf was this: ===== boot=/dev/hda prompt timeout=50 other=/dev/hda1 table=/dev/hda label=Ubuntu other=/dev/hda2 table=/dev/hda label=FreeBSD ===== I have Grub installed at the beginning of /dev/hda1, and Lilo [when I had it installed before changing it to `boot0'] passed control to Grub just fine when booting ``Ubuntu''. You can see that the logic for ``FreeBSD'' is identical except for the slice it uses. When choosing ``FreeBSD'' from the boot menu, nothing happened. This led me to conclude that /boot/boot as not installed at the beginning of /dev/hda2. > > (Actually, you can delete "loader=/boot/chain.b" since FreeBSD and > Linux share the same disk in your case -- and I assume you use lilo to > dual-boot Linux and FreeBSD.) > > > My workaround for this was to choose option 1) boot manager. I ended > > up using boot0 (the boot manager) which I feel is superior to Lilo > > because it is more modular, simpler. However, some users may not > > want this. I didn't find any option in sysinstall to install just > > the /boot/boot code to the beginning of the FreeBSD slice. Am I > > missing something? > > You don't have to go through sysinstall. Just for the case, reinstall > bootstrap code of your FreeBSD slice (say, ad0s1): > > # bsdlabel -B /dev/ad0s1 > > (the code will come from /boot/boot by default), and then reinstall > lilo from Linux, with the aforementioned configuration. > Yes, I figured using `bsdlabel' would install /boot/boot to the beginning of the slice. However, I cannot [easily] run `bsdlabel' without being booted into the FreeBSD OS. I can't run the OS without /boot/boot being installed to the beginning of the FreeBSD slice. Chicken and egg problem. Actually, I could probably run `bsdlabel' from the live disc, but a newbie [like myself] would probably have a hard time figuring this out. P.S. I hope I'm doing the quoting thing ``properly'', not "incorrectly". From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 18:00:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948BC16A419 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:00:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex.rudyk@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E8113C4DD for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:00:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex.rudyk@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so1446536wxd.7 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:00:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=4Src3tVeh+RX924rWwu63bOi6DNS464fhlGBPNOIc+A=; b=GosFYmCjE5a8lnME/eRpbu8HxwR8bTYRb7Kaz1FJ/nXt++kAHVMrFlwGi35J6OmtOdp2o9A8otEMzmbzz0lvmMt0ogMKNlhTdwgI3Jwnzuz6TAZdIHVB5XjDDmqa9FsJXPHQY0jMYMKk/1j5cutRbo1xTxc/vJ8Iimx0sJVHERg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=FDydBoBbwaGx5ld1boWcBk2vhrJcjqnlLGCXVSDur/bcsZioDApcVq2TzOwQpS678/Gh61jjMJWpyh3gC/qWqHC9MrNYzsEt2Y81DQhbYccJu/8QuVE43yS/GtBGyBbytCB1X9qgh5+PWw+1kBzxF5+Ku/HPZvlAnPPfGQw0OEg= Received: by 10.142.99.21 with SMTP id w21mr3303541wfb.55.1200420025873; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:00:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.88.18 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:00:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6e9d2bb40801151000n3ac57e41x32d36ab83a5aaa3d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:00:25 -0800 From: "Oleksandr Rudyk" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <6e9d2bb40801150958m1251de1dwc70b555f7606c927@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6e9d2bb40801141110v8f833b8v86ba21aa1d8fb258@mail.gmail.com> <576dcbc20801141704h48f349b3n1bd10394c0b8a1a3@mail.gmail.com> <6e9d2bb40801150958m1251de1dwc70b555f7606c927@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: 7.0 RC1 snd_hda headset sound only X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:00:27 -0000 I added hint.pcm.0.config="gpio0 gpio1 gpio2 gpio3 gpio4" to /boot/device.hints and sound work with internal speakers. But now plugin headset doesnt mute speakers, but this is another problem and I already found how to fix it 2008/1/14, lveax : > > On Jan 15, 2008 3:10 AM, Oleksandr Rudyk wrote: > > Hi all > > > > I have installed 7.0 RC1 on my Dell XPS m1330 with Sigmatel HDA sound. > > snd_hda driver was patched with this > > http://people.freebsd.org/~ariff/README > instructions. > > > > But still have audio only in headset and no sound on internal speakers. > > > > Any suggestions > > > try to add > hint.pcm.0.config="gpio0" > > to your /boot/loader.conf > > that w > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 18:08:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44AAE16A417 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:08:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3653913C461 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:08:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay14.apple.com (relay14.apple.com [17.128.113.52]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 254D11EFB15B; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:08:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay14.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay14.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 0C56928087; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:08:40 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 11807134-a36d1bb00000731a-46-478cf6a75812 Received: from cswiger1.apple.com (cswiger1.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay14.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id DDE4D28083; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:08:39 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <410A0115-E23C-4163-B46F-826F8DC9FCBA@mac.com> From: Chuck Swiger To: Heiko Wundram (Beenic) In-Reply-To: <200801151013.20051.wundram@beenic.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:08:39 -0800 References: <200801151013.20051.wundram@beenic.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: Greylisting and Yahoo Mailinglists X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:08:40 -0000 On Jan 15, 2008, at 1:13 AM, Heiko Wundram (Beenic) wrote: > Additionally, I can't seem to make out a set of "subnets" from which > the > messages arrive; I've so far identified at least five subnets that > Yahoo uses > to send messages out (and I'm hesitant to add five subnets to the > whitelist, > especially when they're not closely related in any way as Yahoos > subnets seem > to be: 66.94.237, 66.163.168, 66.163.169, 69.147.103 and 209.131.38 > is what > I've seen so far from old messages at a quick glance). > > Anybody here have the same problem, and has rules for whitelisting > Yahoo > mailing lists properly? You didn't mention which mailserver or greylist software you are using, but the postgrey implementation (for use with Postfix) has this in postgrey_whitelist_clients: # greylisting.org: Yahoo Groups servers (no retry) scd.yahoo.com ...and you could choose to whitelist all of yahoo.com just as easily. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 18:09:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B568816A46E for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:09:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikola.lecic@anthesphoria.net) Received: from anthesphoria.net (anthesphoria.net [200.46.204.219]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D5D513C4D5 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:09:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikola.lecic@anthesphoria.net) X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.4.1 anthesphoria.net m0FI8wYH091961 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=anthesphoria.net; s=phero; t=1200420544; bh=25hp5O07pfTFMSyzJjXeHiF6KDOt6yQsdVkvDDudp 1g=; l=1476; h=X-Bogosity:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:X-Face:X-Operating-System: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=rPK+wutNJhc oN+WqUs0WmlIX0tMydg/NQWeKf446+6wHSq/OSUhG1z7zdoohYq+w7qy0t6qdNgHIsc DcTjGqKOO0ypBpOqgqdQTTHwCsCJGB4yHOT3A2qT+7mXcrtSkP/I81fEnkwriy6aHSY EHjF9PJy1fB1ttVJMUYtu8HNkg= Received: from anthesphoria.net (adsl-198-212.eunet.yu [213.198.198.212]) (authenticated bits=0) by anthesphoria.net (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0FI8wYH091961 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:09:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from nikola.lecic@anthesphoria.net) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:08:49 +0100 From: Nikola =?UTF-8?B?TGXEjWnEhw==?= To: "Nerius Landys" Message-ID: <20080115190849.622c2ab9@anthesphoria.net> In-Reply-To: <560f92640801150852s32ee4b24ud6b19ad8b8211f0c@mail.gmail.com> References: <560f92640801142157n7194be23u8c4eac084ed474c9@mail.gmail.com> <20080115144508.204f0c77@anthesphoria.net> <560f92640801150852s32ee4b24ud6b19ad8b8211f0c@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.1.0 (GTK+ 2.12.4; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) X-Face: pbl6-.[$G'Fi(Ogs2xlXP-V6{3||$Y[LOYs&~GJoikj'cVjcFC[V7du;;0~6nO= [Vi2?uU1Pq~,=Adj@,T:|"`$AF~il]J.Nz#2pU',Y7.{B;m/?{#sO^Dvo$rnmY6] X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p8 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: sysinstall and bsdlabel/boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:09:06 -0000 On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:52:26 -0800 "Nerius Landys" wrote: > I have Grub installed at the beginning of /dev/hda1, and Lilo [when I > had it installed before changing it to `boot0'] passed control to > Grub just fine when booting ``Ubuntu''. You can see that the logic > for ``FreeBSD'' is identical except for the slice it uses. When > choosing ``FreeBSD'' from the boot menu, nothing happened. This led > me to conclude that /boot/boot as not installed at the beginning > of /dev/hda2. I'd try adding loader=/boot/chain.b as well, just for the case... > Yes, I figured using `bsdlabel' would install /boot/boot to the > beginning of the slice. However, I cannot [easily] run `bsdlabel' > without being booted into the FreeBSD OS. I can't run the OS > without /boot/boot being installed to the beginning of the FreeBSD > slice. Chicken and egg problem. Actually, I could probably run > `bsdlabel' from the live disc, but a newbie [like myself] would > probably have a hard time figuring this out. Yes, you can run in from live CD... > P.S. I hope I'm doing the quoting thing ``properly'', not > "incorrectly". IMHO there is neither FreeBSD- nor Linux-specific mails, and there shouldn't be such thing. These mails are written in English, so it seems that neither of us is right: quotes should be “like this”, not "like this" or ``like this''. Best regards. -- Nikola Lečić :: Никола Лечић From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 18:15:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 975D716A418 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:15:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from benfell@lupin.parts-unknown.org) Received: from lupin.parts-unknown.org (lupin.cybernude.org [66.93.170.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE22613C474 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:15:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from benfell@lupin.parts-unknown.org) Received: (qmail 4894 invoked by uid 501); 15 Jan 2008 18:15:14 -0000 Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:15:14 -0800 From: David Benfell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080115181514.GA2952@parts-unknown.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rS8CxjVDS/+yyDmU" Content-Disposition: inline X-gnupg-public-key: http://www.parts-unknown.org/gnupg/export-0DD1D1E3 X-stardate: [-29]8818.76 X-moon: The Moon is Waxing Crescent (50% of Full) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Subject: trouble with authpf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:15:16 -0000 --rS8CxjVDS/+yyDmU Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7" Content-Disposition: inline --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello all, I had authpf working successfully with a much simpler pf setup. But with a hardware failure, I had to collapse the services I run onto a single system. And I haven't successfully gotten authpf running on this. Attached is my pf.conf in all its ugliness. I don't really know what I'm doing there and this has undoubtedly accumulated some cruft over the several years I've been using it (originally on OpenBSD before it was really working on FreeBSD). authpf itself seems to think it is working. When I ssh into that account, it prints the message of the day and the message I expect about how I'm authenticated from some IP address. And it sits there waiting for me to decide I'm going elsewhere -- all entirely what I've come to expect. What I haven't come to expect is that the access I'm attempting is being blocked. And I'm certain the problem is with my pf setup since a tcpdump of pflog shows the packets being blocked. So I haven't got this right. Any help would be much appreciated. --=20 David Benfell, LCP benfell@parts-unknown.org --- Resume available at http://www.parts-unknown.org/ NOTE: I sign all messages with GnuPG (0DD1D1E3). --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="pf.conf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable # $OpenBSD: pf.conf,v 1.19 2003/03/24 01:47:28 ian Exp $ # # See pf.conf(5) and /usr/share/pf for syntax and examples. # Required order: options, normalization, queueing, translation, filtering. # Macros and tables may be defined and used anywhere. # Note that translation rules are first match while filter rules are last m= atch. # Macros: define common values, so they can be referenced and changed easil= y. #ext_if=3D"ext0" # replace with actual external interface name i.e., dc0 ext_if=3D"sf0" #int_if=3D"int0" # replace with actual internal interface name i.e., dc1 int_if=3D"sf1" voip_cfg_if=3D"vr0" pub_if=3D"sf3" local_if=3D"lo0" #lupin_if=3D"sf1" #internal_net=3D"10.1.1.1/8" internal_net=3D"192.168.18.1/24" external_addr=3D"66.93.170.242" internal_addr=3D"192.168.18.1" routable_subnet=3D"66.93.170.241/28" voip_cfg=3D"192.168.102.1" voip_local=3D"192.168.102.2" mta_ad =3D "192.168.19.242" mta_pt =3D "25" dhcp_net=3D"192.168.20.0/24" #lupin_net=3D"192.168.100.0/24" public_admin_net=3D"192.168.17.0/24" starshine=3D"216.240.40.160/27" #allowed_nets=3D"{ $starshine, $internal_net }" trusted_external=3D"{ 12.22.55.0/24 64.0.0.0/4 134.154.0.0/16 216.240.40.16= 1/27 70.7.71.0/24 }" # Doubletree Local CSU Hayward starshine.org S= print earth_ext=3D"66.93.170.243" earth_int=3D"192.168.18.43" dnscache=3D"192.168.19.4" kindling_ext=3D"66.93.170.244" kindling_int=3D"192.168.19.244" home_ext=3D"66.93.170.245" home_int=3D"192.168.18.44" raven_ext=3D"66.93.170.246" raven_int=3D"192.168.18.45" lair_ext=3D"66.93.170.247" lair_int=3D"192.168.18.46" thunder_ext=3D"66.93.170.248" thunder_int=3D"192.168.18.47" voip_ext=3D"66.93.170.254" #lupin_ext=3D"66.93.170.254" non_routable=3D"{ 10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16, 169.254.0.0/16= }" macintoshes=3D"{ $lair_ext, $lair_int, $thunder_ext, $thunder_int }" linux_pcs=3D"{ $dnscache, $kindling_ext, $kindling_int, $home_ext, $home_in= t, $raven_ext, $raven_int }" auth_local=3D"{ $lair_ext, $lair_int, $thunder_ext, $thunder_int \ $earth_ext, $dnscache, $kindling_ext, $kindling_int, $home_ext, $home_int,= $raven_ext, $raven_int }" #lupin_router=3D"192.168.100.1" #lupin_net=3D"192.168.100.0/24" tcp_udp=3D"proto { tcp, udp }" in_out=3D"{ in, out }" # Tables: similar to macros, but more flexible for many addresses. #table { 10.0.0.0/8, !10.1.0.0/16, 192.168.0.0/24, 192.168.1.18 } table persist table persist table persist { 201.6.117.62, 125.88.102.22, 200.225.217.114, 6= 7.64.167.243, 212.203.9.64, 202.111.157.144, 217.64.100.162, 217.64.100.162= , 217.64.100.162 } # Options: tune the behavior of pf, default values are given. #set timeout { interval 30, frag 10 } #set timeout { tcp.first 120, tcp.opening 30, tcp.established 86400 } #set timeout { tcp.closing 900, tcp.finwait 45, tcp.closed 90 } #set timeout { udp.first 60, udp.single 30, udp.multiple 60 } #set timeout { icmp.first 20, icmp.error 10 } #set timeout { other.first 60, other.single 30, other.multiple 60 } #set limit { states 10000, frags 5000 } #set loginterface none #set optimization normal set block-policy drop #set block-policy return #set require-order yes # Normalization: reassemble fragments and resolve or reduce traffic ambigui= ties. #scrub in from any to any scrub in all # Queueing: rule-based bandwidth control. #altq on $ext_if bandwidth 2Mb cbq queue { dflt, developers, marketing } #altq on $ext_if bandwidth 1.5Mb cbq queue { dflt, tor } #queue dflt bandwidth 5% cbq(default) #queue developers bandwidth 80% #queue marketing bandwidth 15% #queue dflt bandwidth 85% cbq(default) priority 3 #queue tor bandwidth 15% priority 1 # Translation: specify how addresses are to be mapped or redirected. # nat: packets going out through $ext_if with source address $internal_net = will # get translated as coming from the address of $ext_if, a state is created = for # such packets, and incoming packets will be redirected to the internal add= ress. no rdr inet proto tcp from to any port smtp no rdr inet proto tcp from $starshine to any port smtp rdr pass inet proto tcp from any to any port smtp -> 127.0.0.1 port spamd rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from to any port smtp -> 127.0.0.1 port 80= 25 # block SMTP from Hotmail and other spammer networks # hotmail.com rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from 65.54/16 to any port smtp -> 127.0.0.1 port 8= 025 rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from 64.4/16 to any port smtp -> 127.0.0.1 port 80= 25 # prod-infinitum.com.mx rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from 201.153.0.0/16 to any port smtp -> 127.0.0.1 = port 8025 # voyager.net rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from 216.93.66.0/24 to any port smtp -> 127.0.0.1 = port 8025 rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from 71.6.163.0/24 to any port smtp -> 127.0.0.1 p= ort 8025 rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from 74.8.221.0/24 to any port smtp -> 127.0.0.1 p= ort 8025 rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from 172.16.0.0/8 to any port smtp -> 127.0.0.1 po= rt 8025 rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from 195.238.2.0/24 to any port smtp -> 127.0.0.1 = port 8025 #rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to any port smtp -> $mta_ad port $mta_pt # FTP #rdr on { $int_if,$pub_if } proto tcp from any to any port ftp -> 127.0.0.1 #binat-anchor "authpf/*" binat-anchor "authpf/*" #nat on $ext_if from $internal_net to any -> ($ext_if) #binat on $ext_if from $home_int to any -> $home_ext #binat on $ext_if from $raven_int to any -> $raven_ext #binat on $ext_if from $lair_int to any -> $lair_ext #binat on $ext_if from $thunder_int to any -> $thunder_ext #binat on $ext_if from $lupin_router to any -> 66.93.170.253 nat-anchor "authpf/*" nat on $ext_if from $internal_net to any -> $external_addr nat on $ext_if from $dhcp_net to any -> $external_addr nat on $voip_cfg_if from $internal_net to any -> 192.168.102.2 #nat on $ext_if from $lupin_net to any -> $lupin_ext # rdr: packets coming in on $ext_if with destination $external_addr:1234 wi= ll # be redirected to 10.1.1.1:5678. A state is created for such packets, and # outgoing packets will be translated as coming from the external address. #rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to $external_addr/32 port 1234 -> 10.1.1= =2E1 port 5678 # rdr NTP for the GPS time source to the internal network. Hopefully, this= way, # the time source will answer. # rdr outgoing FTP requests to the ftp-proxy #rdr on $int_if proto tcp from any to any port ftp -> 127.0.0.1 port 8021 # spamd-setup puts addresses to be redirected into table . table persist no rdr on { lo0, lo1 } from any to any rdr inet proto tcp from to any port smtp -> 127.0.0.1 port 8025 # redirect connections from spammers to spamd, all legitimate # connections will not be redirected #rdr on $ext_if inet proto tcp \ #from to ($ext_if) port 25 -> 127.0.0.1 port 8025 rdr-anchor "authpf/*" # block IPv6 block in log quick inet6 all antispoof log quick for { $ext_if, $pub_if } pass in log quick on lo0 from any to any # enable authpf rules anchor "authpf/*" # pass redirected connections to spamd listening on the local # loop interface (lo0) pass in log quick on lo0 inet proto tcp \ =66rom to 127.0.0.1 port 8025 #allow SMTP, DNS, ICMP, HTTP #pass in log quick on $int_if inet proto tcp from any to any port { smtp, d= omain } flags S/SA synproxy state #pass in log quick on $int_if inet proto tcp from any to any port { smtp, d= omain } keep state pass in log quick inet proto tcp from any to any port { smtp, domain, http = } keep state pass in log quick inet proto udp from any to any port domain pass log quick proto icmp all #block the outside world unless... block in log on { $ext_if, $pub_if } all #allow access to the outside world unless... pass out log on { $ext_if, $pub_if } all # protect VOIP configuration #pass out log quick on $voip_cfg_if proto tcp from $internal_net to any fla= gs S/SA synproxy state pass out log quick on $voip_cfg_if proto tcp from $internal_net to any keep= state #allow ssh, printing from trusted networks #pass log quick on $ext_if proto tcp from $trusted_external to any port ssh= flags S/SA synproxy state #pass log quick on $ext_if proto tcp from $trusted_external to any port ssh= keep state block log quick on $ext_if proto tcp from to any port ssh pass log quick on { $int_if, $pub_if } proto tcp from any to any port { ssh= , 515, 631 } keep state #pass in log quick on $ext_if proto tcp from $trusted_external to 192.168.1= 8.20 port { 515, 631 } flags S/SA synproxy state pass in log quick on $ext_if proto tcp from $trusted_external to 192.168.18= =2E20 port { 515, 631 } keep state #allow ssh from anywhere (trust sshguard to keep out the riff-raff) pass log quick on $ext_if proto tcp from any to any port ssh keep state #allow NFS within site #sunrpc 111/tcp rpcbind #SUN Remote Procedure Call #sunrpc 111/udp rpcbind #SUN Remote Procedure Call #nfsd-status 1110/tcp #Cluster status info #nfsd-keepalive 1110/udp #Client status info #nfsd 2049/tcp nfs # NFS server daemon #nfsd 2049/udp nfs # NFS server daemon block log quick on { $ext_if, $pub_if } inet $tcp_udp from any to any port = { rpcbind, nfsd-status, nfsd-keepalive, nfsd } pass log quick inet $tcp_udp from any to any port { rpcbind, nfsd-status, n= fsd-keepalive, nfsd } keep state #block ports used by W32.Blaster.Worm, per Speakeasy alert 12 Aug 2003 block in log quick on { $ext_if, $pub_if } inet $tcp_udp from any to any po= rt 134 >< 140 block in log quick on { $ext_if, $pub_if } inet $tcp_udp from any to any po= rt 445 block in log quick on { $ext_if, $pub_if } inet $tcp_udp from any to any po= rt 593 #block ports recommended by CERT block in log quick on { $ext_if, $pub_if } inet proto udp from any to any p= ort 69 block in log quick on { $ext_if, $pub_if } inet proto tcp from any to any p= ort 87 block in log quick on { $ext_if, $pub_if } inet $tcp_udp from any to any po= rt 111 block in log quick on { $ext_if, $pub_if } inet proto tcp from any to any p= ort 511 >< 516 block in log quick on { $ext_if, $pub_if } inet proto tcp from any to any p= ort 540 block in log quick on { $ext_if, $pub_if } inet $tcp_udp from any to any po= rt 2000 block in log quick on { $ext_if, $pub_if } inet $tcp_udp from any to any po= rt 2049 block in log quick on { $ext_if, $pub_if } inet $tcp_udp from any to any po= rt 5999 >< 6064 #block ports recommended by Felix von Leitner block in log quick on { $ext_if, $pub_if } inet $tcp_udp from any to any po= rt 5000 block in log quick on { $ext_if, $pub_if } inet $tcp_udp from any to any po= rt 1025 #LDAP stuff block in log quick on { $ext_if, $pub_if } inet $tcp_udp from any to any po= rt ldap block in log quick on { $ext_if, $pub_if } inet $tcp_udp from any to any po= rt ldaps #pass in log quick on $int_if inet $tcp_udp from any to any port ldap #pass in log quick on $int_if inet $tcp_udp from any to any port ldaps #allow non-privileged ports anywhere #pass log quick $tcp_udp from any to any port>1023 flags S/SA synproxy state pass log quick $tcp_udp from any to any port>1023 keep state #allow Tor services to router #pass in $tcp_udp from any to { $external_addr, $internal_addr } port { 90= 01, 9030 } flags S/SA synproxy state pass in $tcp_udp from any to { $external_addr, $internal_addr } port { 900= 1, 9030 } keep state #allow FTP to ftp-proxy #pass in on $ext_if inet proto tcp from port ftp-data to 127.0.0.1 user pro= xy flags S/SA synproxy state #pass in on $ext_if inet proto tcp from port ftp-data to 127.0.0.1 user pro= xy keep state #allow internal access to and from DMZ #allow Internet access here pass in log quick on { $int_if, $pub_if } $tcp_udp from { $internal_net, $d= hcp_net } to any keep state # pass incoming ports for ftp-proxy #pass in on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to $ext_if user proxy keep stat= e queue dflt # assign packets to a queue. #pass out on $ext_if from 192.168.0.0/24 to any keep state queue developers= queue dflt #pass out on $ext_if from 192.168.1.0/24 to any keep state queue marketing = queue dflt --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7-- --rS8CxjVDS/+yyDmU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHjPgyUd+dMw3R0eMRAiHBAJ9+zWqaziNEDCurwafiUmuelAyzugCffbka p1SUO+W1MhW1kMOvw62ObOg= =oKg/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rS8CxjVDS/+yyDmU-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 18:20:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7762516A421 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:20:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65DC013C469 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:20:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay13.apple.com (relay13.apple.com [17.128.113.29]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 545791EFB60A; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:20:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay13.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay13.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 4106028098; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:20:23 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 1180711d-9cbecbb000001e9b-59-478cf967d053 Received: from cswiger1.apple.com (cswiger1.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay13.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 205C22808F; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:20:23 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <780F066B-1F42-479C-800F-3A9895E6DE62@mac.com> From: Chuck Swiger To: =?UTF-8?Q?Nikola_Le=C4=8Di=C4=87?= In-Reply-To: <20080115190849.622c2ab9@anthesphoria.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:20:22 -0800 References: <560f92640801142157n7194be23u8c4eac084ed474c9@mail.gmail.com> <20080115144508.204f0c77@anthesphoria.net> <560f92640801150852s32ee4b24ud6b19ad8b8211f0c@mail.gmail.com> <20080115190849.622c2ab9@anthesphoria.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org, Nerius Landys Subject: Re: sysinstall and bsdlabel/boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:20:23 -0000 On Jan 15, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Nikola Le=C4=8Di=C4=87 wrote: >> P.S. I hope I'm doing the quoting thing ``properly'', not >> "incorrectly". > > IMHO there is neither FreeBSD- nor Linux-specific mails, and there > shouldn't be such thing. These mails are written in English, so it > seems that neither of us is right: quotes should be =E2=80=9Clike = this=E2=80=9D, =20 > not > "like this" or ``like this''. While I would agree with the above, Unix shells make a distinction =20 between different types of quote characters, and if you are talking =20 about command-line programming or scripts, there is an advantage to =20 quoting things in a fashion that the shell will be happy with. Double-quotes (") permit variable, history, and alias expansion of the =20= quoted terms, whereas single forward quotes (') give you a string =20 literal and disable expansion. Backquotes (`) are used to perform =20 command substitution and are a synonym for "$(command)" syntax; =20 something like "echo `ls`" would be a simple example. Regards, --=20 -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 18:24:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A173216A417 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:24:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norman@apache.org) Received: from vs159071.vserver.de (hiphopcorner.de [62.75.159.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A58913C43E for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:24:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norman@apache.org) Received: from [192.168.0.29] (IP-213157018232.static.heagmedianet.de [213.157.18.232]) by vs159071.vserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1FCDBE85F8; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:24:39 +0000 (UTC) From: Norman Maurer To: John Clement In-Reply-To: <5B88B3834A330D4280D10517A4B7C586F290@dst-ex-01.readingroom.local> References: <478C4C94.8080504@szalbot.homedns.org> <1200377886.6647.3.camel@norman-laptop> <478C5183.7090509@szalbot.homedns.org> <1200379837.6647.6.camel@norman-laptop> <478C665B.3060608@szalbot.homedns.org> <1200386014.6647.7.camel@norman-laptop> <5B88B3834A330D4280D10517A4B7C586F290@dst-ex-01.readingroom.local> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:24:29 +0100 Message-Id: <1200421469.7320.0.camel@norman-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: zbigniew szalbot , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: newest security patch and custom kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:24:41 -0000 Well it depends ... If you know it only change the version string i whould say no on a production server. bye Norman Am Dienstag, den 15.01.2008, 16:57 +0000 schrieb John Clement: > > The -p10 includes no kernel updates so restarting is not neccesarry. > > Would it not be advisable to reboot after installing a new kernel > anyway, to make sure it restarts ok... better that than finding out it > doesn't boot next time to reboot... > > > > bye > > Norman > > > > Am Dienstag, den 15.01.2008, 08:52 +0100 schrieb zbigniew szalbot: > > > Hello again, > > > > > > Norman Maurer pisze: > > > > It should be enough to just building and installing the kernel. > The > > > > freebsd-update should have patched the kernel src files anyway. > > > > > > > Thank you for very helpful advice. One last question, is it > necessary > > > to restart the machine? Or can I keep it online after building and > > > installing the kernel? I don't care about uname -a details not being > > > updated unless the machine needs restarting to include the updates. > > > > > > Thank you! > > > > > > Zbigniew Szalbot > > > > bye > > > > Norman > > > > > > > > > > > > Am Dienstag, den 15.01.2008, 07:24 +0100 schrieb zbigniew szalbot: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Norman Maurer pisze: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > the /usr/src/sys* stuff should be patched anyway. But you need > > to build > > > > > > your kernel again and install it to reflect the changes. Even > > if i think > > > > > > it only update the -p10 label in the case of -p10 patch set. > > > > > > > > > > > OK. So this page applies to me now? > > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859- > > 1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-building.html > > > > > > > > > > 1. > > > > > > > > > > Change to the /usr/src directory: > > > > > > > > > > # cd /usr/src > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. > > > > > > > > > > Compile the kernel: > > > > > > > > > > # make buildkernel KERNCONF=/MYKERNEL/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3. > > > > > > > > > > Install the new kernel: > > > > > > > > > > # make installkernel KERNCONF=/MYKERNEL/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Note:* It is required to have full FreeBSD source tree to > > build the > > > > > kernel. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am interested if I need to download latest FBSD sources then? > I > > have > > > > > not touched them since I built a custom kernel. > > > > > > > > > > Thank you! > > > > > > > > > > Zbigniew Szalbot > > > > > > > > > > > cheers > > > > > > Norman > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Am Dienstag, den 15.01.2008, 07:03 +0100 schrieb zbigniew > > szalbot: > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Using freebsd-update I applied the latest security patches > > which were > > > > > > > announced yesterday. However, I then notice this message: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The following files will be updated as part of updating to > > 6.2-RELEASE-p10: > > > > > > > /boot/GENERIC/kernel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My question is whether my update missed the point because I > > have a > > > > > > > custom kernel? If so, do I need to apply it manually as > > described in the > > > > > > > security advisory? If I still want to go down the binary > > road, how can I > > > > > > > make sure my custom kernel gets patched, too? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you very much! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Zbigniew Szalbot > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 18:33:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3926216A418 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:33:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dzalewski@open-craft.com) Received: from srv.open-craft.com (srv.open-craft.com [205.209.147.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2B913C457 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:33:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dzalewski@open-craft.com) Received: from [196.218.200.202] (helo=[10.0.0.11]) by srv.open-craft.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JEqbO-00011O-Bq for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:33:35 -0500 From: Dominik Zalewski To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1200397035.5681.22.camel@polonium.opencraft.local> References: <1200397035.5681.22.camel@polonium.opencraft.local> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: OpenCraft Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:33:32 +0200 Message-Id: <1200422012.5681.61.camel@polonium.opencraft.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - srv.open-craft.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - open-craft.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.1 php5 cli core dumped X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dzalewski@open-craft.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:33:35 -0000 I disabled php_mapscript.so extension and PHP CLI doesn't seem to core dump anymore. Problem is that I really need mapscript. I tried to recompile mapserver but it didn't help. Any ideas? On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 13:37 +0200, Dominik Zalewski wrote: > Dear All, > > I'm using FreeBSD 6.1 i386 and I'm having problem with php5-cli . > > When I try to run php myscript.php I'm getting: Segmentation fault: 11 > (core dumped) > > Script runs fine under a web browser. The problem is only when running > php from command line. > > Some people suggested that I should change module order in > extensions.ini . I played a bit but it didn't help. > > Here is my extensions.ini : > > extension=session.so > extension=json.so > extension=php_mapscript.so > extension=ctype.so > extension=ldap.so > extension=curl.so > extension=ftp.so > extension=gd.so > extension=iconv.so > extension=mbstring.so > extension=mysql.so > extension=pcre.so > extension=simplexml.so > extension=tokenizer.so > extension=xml.so > extension=zlib.so > > Installed php5 ports: > > php5-5.2.5 PHP Scripting Language > php5-ctype-5.2.5 The ctype shared extension for php > php5-curl-5.2.5 The curl shared extension for php > php5-ftp-5.2.5 The ftp shared extension for php > php5-gd-5.2.5 The gd shared extension for php > php5-iconv-5.2.5 The iconv shared extension for php > php5-ldap-5.2.5 The ldap shared extension for php > php5-mbstring-5.2.5 The mbstring shared extension for php > php5-mysql-5.2.5 The mysql shared extension for php > php5-pcre-5.2.5 The pcre shared extension for php > php5-session-5.2.5 The session shared extension for php > php5-simplexml-5.2.5 The simplexml shared extension for php > php5-tokenizer-5.2.5 The tokenizer shared extension for php > php5-xml-5.2.5 The xml shared extension for php > php5-zlib-5.2.5 The zlib shared extension for php > > Regards, > > Dominik > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 18:38:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2937916A469 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:38:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA9513C457 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:38:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay14.apple.com (relay14.apple.com [17.128.113.52]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D8D1EFBBCD; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:38:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay14.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay14.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id ED72928087; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:38:00 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 11807134-a66d7bb00000731a-05-478cfd88e67d Received: from cswiger1.apple.com (cswiger1.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay14.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id D0E2728083; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:38:00 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <7736594F-5CFD-4C5E-AD7A-19058007F188@mac.com> From: Chuck Swiger To: dzalewski@open-craft.com In-Reply-To: <1200422012.5681.61.camel@polonium.opencraft.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:38:00 -0800 References: <1200397035.5681.22.camel@polonium.opencraft.local> <1200422012.5681.61.camel@polonium.opencraft.local> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.1 php5 cli core dumped X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:38:01 -0000 On Jan 15, 2008, at 10:33 AM, Dominik Zalewski wrote: > I disabled php_mapscript.so extension and PHP CLI doesn't seem to core > dump anymore. Problem is that I really need mapscript. > > I tried to recompile mapserver but it didn't help. > > Any ideas? Yes, change the order that particular module is listed in your extensions.ini file. Try moving it to the last position, for example.... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 18:50:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C115916A41A for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:50:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.155]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78EAA13C457 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:49:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so3079673fgg.35 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:49:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=atGzq33n+Ox62Hg2CIdCxwEIk7+mc1f0acSjXWrJ0Cg=; b=q1nhIPLFlCJ5O3sZTM2VmzIvGl6bZQKMuD2XBCTepoNAMZL73c5ws7ZkBuMaCx5+C944FxmV4Rc7NrDzcL4z8bwz0un7nkxtrXLt2y6QhTgqwSDQ+cBX7xEdVhUDz0cybHH4NtAt/X6kwN7V2w4BL9WPAJq7ERChk85znvybqX8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=h6UfO4mlK41PJ36AvXhjY94a5IMZdwSJJ5TSCCZk2ZZ+uGGXGPUGvlGMHis8HLmAvIG030w9eCpmHiiFpOS8gvISs/oAGYe+YMidx0AcQn6/EYT6WB6XrnvPiS4qqiQjEt7k0FQKYw+njojWDI1yVtlt6Oh+Dj9d1Vvq25iytBA= Received: by 10.82.148.7 with SMTP id v7mr13735429bud.10.1200422996185; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:49:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.180.16 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:49:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <560f92640801151049t32fe1c23r8aa8e503b53a9581@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:49:56 -0800 From: "Nerius Landys" To: "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Nikola_Le=E8i=E6?=" In-Reply-To: <20080115190849.622c2ab9@anthesphoria.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <560f92640801142157n7194be23u8c4eac084ed474c9@mail.gmail.com> <20080115144508.204f0c77@anthesphoria.net> <560f92640801150852s32ee4b24ud6b19ad8b8211f0c@mail.gmail.com> <20080115190849.622c2ab9@anthesphoria.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysinstall and bsdlabel/boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:50:03 -0000 > > Yes, I figured using `bsdlabel' would install /boot/boot to the > > beginning of the slice. However, I cannot [easily] run `bsdlabel' > > without being booted into the FreeBSD OS. I can't run the OS > > without /boot/boot being installed to the beginning of the FreeBSD > > slice. Chicken and egg problem. Actually, I could probably run > > `bsdlabel' from the live disc, but a newbie [like myself] would > > probably have a hard time figuring this out. > > Yes, you can run in from live CD... > > Let's assume that my theory is correct (I could verify this by installing again, but I don't want to clobber over again). Theory: When I install 7.0 FreeBSD, and I choose to leave the MBR alone (when I am presented with the three choices about what to do with the MBR). then no boot code is installed to any FreeBSD slice (much of the time there will be just one FreeBSD slice). Now, imagine I'm a new user who doesn't have a clue. If I choose not to install MBR code, then there will be no obvious way to boot into FreeBSD. The installation will be unusable to the inexperienced user. I suggest adding some menu option or something during install to allow a user installing FreeBSD to write boot code to the beginning of the FreeBSD slice that has the kernel. Or maybe even do this automatically under certain circumstances. I would be able to verify my theory only after I get my test computer set up, which won't be in a few days. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 19:57:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07D616A417 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:57:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nullpt@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 794E413C442 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:57:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nullpt@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id l8so1255204nzf.13 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:57:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=FLscZ2jTqO1KVSJLDec5qLostHShsH52e40aEjmZrzk=; b=CqXzVtOGEcme7fXPDXMz2Rwd17Pwb37z3PnBB9xkryae/FJygjPVn/htAVCqrSknfIDAEHY0SAKbDmSAIeiJWCeqPzumT2uNRS3ZS9A7G9+ODCxbITGvWOU4RAXP7zVWrSs20SWjJgm+zlD1g8qi5Usrk8+IxuMoBHI1nOrFXQI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=S2M4OOP4VwgpCjCbdO3GoP9qBLcdajOa06ORLx2ZxGHXoLbrpmPUtPOXgfTgD1vXZ/hzMi9Lie6i1PpIZcVTiCC3h4axMB28Hn4RTc0l8Nal/4+/f2iLa6V4hm4LZONVaWGGCQgXsqqvYvsq24+NEPQEctBLg2I13NlSZahWPG8= Received: by 10.114.150.1 with SMTP id x1mr5235313wad.46.1200425361657; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:29:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.240.9 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:29:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <755cb9fc0801151129h6e519557g7ea33e4190196fed@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:29:21 +0000 From: "Alexandre Vieira" To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Relayd (former hoststated) status for freebsd 7.0RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:57:45 -0000 Hello all, I remember that there was a port (net/hoststated) where I could install hoststated to use with PF. Anyone can shed a light on what is the status of this software implementation on 7.0? TIA -- Alexandre Vieira - nullpt@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 20:07:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56DDC16A418 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:07:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1665E13C442 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:07:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0FK71Qn005341; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:07:01 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m0FK71sR005338; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:07:01 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:07:01 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: cpghost In-Reply-To: <20080115154527.GA15932@epia-2.farid-hajji.net> Message-ID: <20080115130137.R5255@wonkity.com> References: <87A9631B-EAC5-41B8-B4C2-001C3ADBA486@identry.com> <200801150237.m0F2bqEg000116@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <360AB6AE-B3C1-4CA6-AFC1-378B48B3C6DF@identry.com> <20080115154527.GA15932@epia-2.farid-hajji.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:07:01 -0700 (MST) Cc: John Almberg , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No spam??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:07:15 -0000 On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, cpghost wrote: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 08:48:32AM -0500, John Almberg wrote: >> >> So raises the same point that Oliver makes: how trustworthy are these >> blacklists? > > YMMV, of course! > > I'm using spamhaus.org's blacklists for quite some time (many years) > to block spam in postfix and they've been VERY trustworthy so far. > > But I can't say the same for the others, which seem occasionally a > little bit too eager/aggressive and accumulate way too many false > positives. "Trustworthy" is entirely subjective in this case. I've seen people complain about high false positives with a DNSBL that has been extremely trustworthy for me, and then turn around and recommend one that had a very high false positive rate. In general, people should check a DNSBL's blocking criteria and reputation before using it. They should also realize that's it's not an exact science, and be willing to manually whitelist and otherwise adjust things from time to time. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 20:29:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A60A316A46C; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:29:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brad@comstyle.com) Received: from mail.comstyle.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:16d8:ffe8:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29CFA13C474; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:29:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brad@comstyle.com) Received: from [192.168.3.30] (toronto-hs-216-138-195-228.s-ip.magma.ca [216.138.195.228]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: brad) by mail.comstyle.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F7982D2F; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:29:36 +0100 (CET) From: Brad To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:29:32 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <755cb9fc0801151129h6e519557g7ea33e4190196fed@mail.gmail.com> <478D1694.8010906@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <478D1694.8010906@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801151529.32312.brad@comstyle.com> X-comstyle-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: 24F7982D2F.E1AC8 X-comstyle-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-comstyle-MailScanner-From: brad@comstyle.com X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Relayd (former hoststated) status for freebsd 7.0RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:29:56 -0000 On Tuesday 15 January 2008 15:24:52 Bruce M. Simpson wrote: > Alexandre Vieira wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I remember that there was a port (net/hoststated) where I could install > > hoststated to use with PF. Anyone can shed a light on what is the status of > > this software implementation on 7.0? > > > > Perhaps ports/net/ifstated is the answer? > > BMS ifstated and relayd (used to be hoststated) are for totally different purposes. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 20:43:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E75F416A417 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:43:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com (out3.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C89C413C4E9 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:43:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73EA28A5B2; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:24:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:24:58 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: f+RIxgWQUf8h+Z2/rNcoiWpz/0zHocnMRs3QAGcBqyHq 1200428698 Received: from empiric.lon.incunabulum.net (82-35-112-254.cable.ubr07.dals.blueyonder.co.uk [82.35.112.254]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C07E2A5B6; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:24:56 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <478D1694.8010906@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:24:52 +0000 From: "Bruce M. Simpson" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070928) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexandre Vieira References: <755cb9fc0801151129h6e519557g7ea33e4190196fed@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <755cb9fc0801151129h6e519557g7ea33e4190196fed@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Relayd (former hoststated) status for freebsd 7.0RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:43:03 -0000 Alexandre Vieira wrote: > Hello all, > > I remember that there was a port (net/hoststated) where I could install > hoststated to use with PF. Anyone can shed a light on what is the status of > this software implementation on 7.0? > Perhaps ports/net/ifstated is the answer? BMS From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 21:52:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 969AE16A419 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:52:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trey@fastmail.fm) Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com (out3.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 732E313C44B for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:52:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trey@fastmail.fm) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E828AB6F for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:52:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:52:09 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: 2aYnjMfzkQvGs7Sw1vV+9PFgruogKYpczJ4uPCeETwzJ 1200433928 Received: from localhost (unknown [98.18.50.179]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AE31105A3 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:52:08 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:52:07 -0500 From: Trey Sizemore To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080115215207.GA25385@valkyrie> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1200402658.23101.1231331249@webmail.messagingengine.com> <478CB781.5040809@otenet.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <478CB781.5040809@otenet.gr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17cvs (2008-01-14) Subject: Re: Downloading ports tree again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:52:09 -0000 --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue Jan 15, 2008 03:39PM, Manolis Kiagias wrote: > Trey Sizemore wrote: >> I have used portsnap to download the ports tree. Recently, I've removed >> /usr/ports/* and now need to download the ports tree again. >> >> However, running portnap fetch results in: >> "Ports tree hasn't changed since last snapshot >> No updates needed" >> >> How can I 'reset' portsnap and get the ports tree again? >> >> Thanks! >> =20 > I would first try a "portsnap extract" and see if this extracts the =20 > whole ports tree again (from what I understand from the man page, it=20 > will) > > Otherwise, portsnap saves its state in /var/db/portsnap. You could try = =20 > deleting the files in there. > Thanks, using "portsnap extract" did it. --=20 Cheers, Trey ---- =20 Do not seek death; death will find you. But seek the road which makes death a fulfillment. --Dag Hammarskjold =20 Linux valkyrie 2.6.22.13-0.3-bigsmp i686 GNU/Linux 4:51pm up 9:34, 5 users, load average: 0.33, 0.88, 1.00 --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHjSsHhvrdIlvmiVURAjMXAJ9Df7vLXfma2PFYv/5/Bj1EofgrOgCfTPB+ nWFYKvPQwvmFSQTepDNkeHg= =9JAr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 21:59:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C20F716A41A for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:59:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nullpt@gmail.com) Received: from ro-out-1112.google.com (ro-out-1112.google.com [72.14.202.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62DFF13C45A for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:59:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nullpt@gmail.com) Received: by ro-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m6so3302006roe.13 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:59:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=Ym8y8GH5UcmxbUZ8yVwvuDfB5grWG6G/zhpNqt4L1cQ=; b=akqqTReflPUeXz9AlkIsnj/u9twVmwcL3XWP/dLRCgxWTSSf5IKKOCDPlhwzqI1cit7DgtlsR45aUJuufCgNo83OSyoIYRnnCTwzvrHkcePW3XDRnAFJZlUh+pR2zQTb/tw2c2Piyh0WBKCmtRYT3Kibg80lPBDDzggCmPQLWqY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Q3mAzUSVIsfMeiUuYF9xeOEFcpjXD8Zaa7UCaQeRxCtKegVreerMnf49ZMYQj/1Www7PHWIi3kfiVkiXVaO3tBxGlauwy+gNjfjzrLfbydpacMKJckQA6QUVjQW8mU4jq/4yHBJwZuPjHJYmE/XQF1Oy4i7s7LuqfqEwpIxP4WY= Received: by 10.114.53.1 with SMTP id b1mr5510078waa.134.1200434339413; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:58:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.240.9 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:58:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <755cb9fc0801151358k35cdd267x7500767925e5f3cc@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:58:59 +0000 From: "Alexandre Vieira" To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200801151529.32312.brad@comstyle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <755cb9fc0801151129h6e519557g7ea33e4190196fed@mail.gmail.com> <478D1694.8010906@FreeBSD.org> <200801151529.32312.brad@comstyle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: flz@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Relayd (former hoststated) status for freebsd 7.0RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:59:01 -0000 On Jan 15, 2008 8:29 PM, Brad wrote: > On Tuesday 15 January 2008 15:24:52 Bruce M. Simpson wrote: > > Alexandre Vieira wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > > > I remember that there was a port (net/hoststated) where I could > install > > > hoststated to use with PF. Anyone can shed a light on what is the > status of > > > this software implementation on 7.0? > > > > > > > Perhaps ports/net/ifstated is the answer? > > > > BMS > > ifstated and relayd (used to be hoststated) are for totally different > purposes. > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Hi, I meant hostated aka hoststated aka relayd. It's in Obsd base system and had there was a port for freebsd not long ago. I've found the old port structure: http://people.freebsd.org/~flz/local/ports/hoststated/ which stands for ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/local-distfiles/flz/hoststated/hoststated-20070131.tgz. Many changes were commited since 07/01/31: http://kho.bonghongxanh.vn/pub/.disk0/ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/cvs/src/usr.sbin/relayd/Makefile,v Added flz@ to the loop. TIA for any effort to get this working. Kind Regards -- Alexandre Vieira - nullpt@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 23:01:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4CB216A418 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:01:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CE3E13C467 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:01:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu ([151.77.240.163]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0FN5smR022737 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:06:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0FN3vL7022558 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:03:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <478D3B40.3000509@netfence.it> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:01:20 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 212.31.247.179 Subject: Limit on number of groups a user can join X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:01:34 -0000 Today I added an user to a new group and suddenly he reported he could not use this server anymore: he could not login via ssh or access Samba shares. I tried (as root) "su username" and it failed. I removed it from that group and everything worked fine again. I made some tries removing him from other groups and I got to the conclusion that it works as long as he is in no more than 15 groups, but breaks when he join the 16th. Is this an hard limit? Can it be extended? Why this? bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 23:13:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94BB716A418 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:13:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 441A913C43E for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:13:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay13.apple.com (relay13.apple.com [17.128.113.29]) by mail-out3.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38FDD1E2550B; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:13:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay13.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay13.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 1D9CA28087; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:13:05 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 1180711d-99be6bb000001e9b-cc-478d3e01b2ab Received: from cswiger1.apple.com (cswiger1.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay13.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 0022328084; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:13:04 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <5B919738-51BD-4319-A112-BC322FD7904F@mac.com> From: Chuck Swiger To: Andrea Venturoli In-Reply-To: <478D3B40.3000509@netfence.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:13:04 -0800 References: <478D3B40.3000509@netfence.it> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Limit on number of groups a user can join X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:13:05 -0000 On Jan 15, 2008, at 3:01 PM, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > I made some tries removing him from other groups and I got to the > conclusion that it works as long as he is in no more than 15 groups, > but breaks when he join the 16th. Is this an hard limit? Can it be > extended? Why this? This limit is somewhat historical but cannot easily be changed because this max # is hard-coded into the NFS protocol, which needs to describe which groups a user belongs to. If you're not using NFS, you might try changing the declaration of KI_NGROUPS in /usr/src/sys/ user.h and build a new kernel, I believe.... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 23:37:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B14F316A420 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:37:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nick.rout@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 859B913C455 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:37:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nick.rout@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so64465waf.3 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:37:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=wCy9MgtKVZEUedvvfBxzI8YEF6LDEQEFKc97HFnZB2g=; b=uw+qicMnDj8yakOK8gHN14/TVtY6+YvtmSJfRegbRi6deFRluRvrSzE3SBrTS/uagBLiPfM2IsrZ9X4wzndvNbAem7/n0AZZrvzjZ4ShNPWSyss0e64+dSyhP95GEy7+Zf+lEoh+ptuE3FBaC9fMIDvZMGb7itwlFouyKLYkFps= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=q0e9ffifvxwXUXpyz1ilGK3DpM72efEmnTWOgR4yEQXSR1a7q4MMRvUegqf5MKn1oWPIRCkt8BV1VGtIhJy+UJYXXQQmb5HE0hZuP8IEfyxsI17FeSt7iKvXUo3f7Fgc4GpRscIkBmf0PpVGpe0tfnXX0NI6/Kfh0MpPCSaw4XM= Received: by 10.114.137.2 with SMTP id k2mr48628wad.104.1200438538844; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:08:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.115.90.20 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:08:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52bd4a780801151508t723fe51dw2554bfa8c504a42d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:08:58 +1300 From: "Nick Rout" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Trouble compiling php5-xml X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:37:37 -0000 I am trying to compile php5-xml (as a dependency to rtgui). I get this error: cc -I. -I/usr/ports/textproc/php5-xml/work/php-5.2.5/ext/xml -DPHP_ATOM_INC -I/usr/ports/textproc/php5-xml/work/php-5.2.5/ext/xml/include -I/usr/ports/textproc/php5-xml/work/php-5.2.5/ext/xml/main -I/usr/ports/textproc/php5-xml/work/php-5.2.5/ext/xml -I/usr/local/include/php -I/usr/local/include/php/main -I/usr/local/include/php/TSRM -I/usr/local/include/php/Zend -I/usr/local/include/php/ext -I/usr/local/include/libxml2 -I/usr/local/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -c /usr/ports/textproc/php5-xml/work/php-5.2.5/ext/xml/xml.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/xml.o /usr/ports/textproc/php5-xml/work/php-5.2.5/ext/xml/xml.c:74: warning: parameter names (without types) in function declaration /usr/ports/textproc/php5-xml/work/php-5.2.5/ext/xml/xml.c:160: error: `xml' undeclared here (not in a function) /usr/ports/textproc/php5-xml/work/php-5.2.5/ext/xml/xml.c:160: error: initializer element is not constant /usr/ports/textproc/php5-xml/work/php-5.2.5/ext/xml/xml.c:160: error: (near initialization for `xml_module_entry.post_deactivate_func') /usr/ports/textproc/php5-xml/work/php-5.2.5/ext/xml/xml.c:161: error: initializer element is not constant /usr/ports/textproc/php5-xml/work/php-5.2.5/ext/xml/xml.c:161: error: (near initialization for `xml_module_entry.globals_id') /usr/ports/textproc/php5-xml/work/php-5.2.5/ext/xml/xml.c:162: warning: initialization makes integer from pointer without a cast /usr/ports/textproc/php5-xml/work/php-5.2.5/ext/xml/xml.c:163: warning: initialization makes integer from pointer without a cast /usr/ports/textproc/php5-xml/work/php-5.2.5/ext/xml/xml.c:164: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/ports/textproc/php5-xml/work/php-5.2.5/ext/xml/xml.c:164: warning: (near initialization for `xml_module_entry') /usr/ports/textproc/php5-xml/work/php-5.2.5/ext/xml/xml.c:164: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/ports/textproc/php5-xml/work/php-5.2.5/ext/xml/xml.c:164: warning: (near initialization for `xml_module_entry') /usr/ports/textproc/php5-xml/work/php-5.2.5/ext/xml/xml.c:165: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/ports/textproc/php5-xml/work/php-5.2.5/ext/xml/xml.c:165: warning: (near initialization for `xml_module_entry') /usr/ports/textproc/php5-xml/work/php-5.2.5/ext/xml/xml.c: In function `PHP_GINIT_FUNCTION': /usr/ports/textproc/php5-xml/work/php-5.2.5/ext/xml/xml.c:187: error: invalid type argument of `->' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/php5-xml/work/php-5.2.5/ext/xml. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/php5-xml. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/php5-xmlrpc. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net-p2p/rtgui. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net-p2p/rtgui. Can anyone help me in sorting this out? Cheers (new to the list by the way :-) ) Nick. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 02:07:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 640ED16A46C for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:07:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=VVro=SG=claro.com.br=mensagem@srs.kundenserver.de) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E098A13C4D5 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:07:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=VVro=SG=claro.com.br=mensagem@srs.kundenserver.de) Received: from infong387.kundenserver.de (infong387.kundenserver.de [212.227.127.182]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu3) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MKxQS-1JExU30mpP-0004vS; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:54:27 +0100 Received: from 201.86.240.124 (IP may be forged by CGI script) by infong387.kundenserver.de with HTTP id 4AgGcx-1JExU30ZRz-00010o; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:54:27 +0100 X-Sender-Info: <150899874@infong387.kundenserver.de> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:54:27 +0100 Message-Id: <4AgGcx-1JExU30ZRz-00010o@infong387.kundenserver.de> Precedence: bulk To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org From: X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+8NZFMSYCoBC9u9GPUptFUV0JCgtpVojyeRTA knzW/ssLhY/IoLm0WDwB+uHvZOz1VTsinr94fxJx56TNmi7JxP tz0rAiyeU79/XsNCaC6YQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Que 2008 seja de paz e harmonia ( me liga felicidades) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:07:02 -0000 Que 2008 seja de paz e harmonia ( me liga felicidades) [tit_grupo_video_download.gif] [logo_claro.jpg] Voc recebeu um Claro Vdeo Download! Claro Vdeo Download enviado do nmero 0XX 92645433 [1]Visualizar Claro Vdeo Download (90kb / tempo estimado: 0:50seg) Importante: Claro Vdeo Download ficar disponvel na Web durante 7 dias. Claro. A vida na sua mo. [2]Site da Claro | [3]Termos de uso | [4]Poltica de Privacidade Copyright Claro 2006 References 1. http://216.133.246.52/clarovideomensagem/video.scr 2. http://www.claroideias.com.br/portal/site/CIdeias/menuitem.7df34df2cc1d8a7933d1593b22dc10a0/&idlocal=56 3. http://www.claroideias.com.br/portal/site/CIdeias/menuitem.7df34df2cc1d8a7933d1593b22dc10a0/&idlocal=56 4. http://www.claroideias.com.br/portal/site/CIdeias/menuitem.7df34df2cc1d8a7933d1593b22dc10a0/&idlocal=56 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 02:54:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D60D16A417 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:54:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 890C913C45A for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:54:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m0G2sor3035381 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:54:50 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.6/8.12.11) id m0G2skn2022882; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:54:46 +0700 (ICT) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:54:46 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200801160254.m0G2skn2022882@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: jalmberg@identry.com In-reply-to: <360AB6AE-B3C1-4CA6-AFC1-378B48B3C6DF@identry.com> (message from John Almberg on Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:48:32 -0500) References: <87A9631B-EAC5-41B8-B4C2-001C3ADBA486@identry.com> <200801150237.m0F2bqEg000116@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <360AB6AE-B3C1-4CA6-AFC1-378B48B3C6DF@identry.com> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No spam??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:54:53 -0000 Hi, > 2008-01-14 09:30:37.074087500 rblsmtpd: 123.20.89.67 pid 72121: 451 > http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=123.20.89.67 Just one comment, in my installation of SpamAssassin, it reports in syslog as spamd, not at rblsmtpd. This looks like logs from the rblsmtpd program that is not SpamAssasin. As some one mentionned, one way to prevent false positive and too agressive black lists is to use them through SpamAssassin only, where the black list score is only part of the spaminess. The draw back is that it puts more load the server and SpamAssassin that has to scrutinize every email, while dropping at the SMTP level is fast and uses very low resources. Bests, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 03:01:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C05A16A468 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 03:01:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B38713C447 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 03:01:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so140253pyb.10 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:01:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=A6uj3fWB9mLSReshC76qtnt79236tE64rROxrNWGe64=; b=vsqjZgI/CGCcopYcBc76uWAinx5RcBPxejUQgg2xTdV44NawjhX8qKhSVc1Q7wNOeVDGMVh0+1KKP0U27EdLtffT4tMh1ALPoh7hLIbrb+iTElwPYckpCUpPYrzBIyNsZ5XGOF8fNycXOcKBHW3Grm0bpYv7VgARP6fqstyBfP8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=qEM4DoDKBxP0K5mOhn1px09hkE4gAX4QmlHDnGwuV1UIBt+kC7YSCKZ+SU6+I3GlzPofgHPApOrL5POJ52DHZ6U5wZbJHVFS16pPnJWpPVaOPAAex0i5HnlwN7/i9rwY0+azD2mmn6n5jS47Q4rC+braGzdTBMsFRSuY6T+1K3k= Received: by 10.142.240.9 with SMTP id n9mr128537wfh.136.1200452455751; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:00:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.72.20 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:00:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:00:55 -0800 From: "Kurt Buff" To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Anyone out there using SSL-Explorer? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 03:01:01 -0000 I've been trying to install it on a box I've thrown together (FreeBSD it-kbuff-fbsd1.mycompany.com 6.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.3-PRERELEASE #0) and have followed the directions as best I could in the following documents: /usr/src/sslexplorer/README (from the src install package at http://internap.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/sslexplorer/sslexplorer-1.0.0_RC13-src.zip) http://n3ncy.com/UNIX/FreeBSD/SSLExplorer.htm (which seems not to be for the source install, and with which I had no luck) and http://3sp.com/kb/idx/21/088/article/How_do_I_install_the_source_code.html (the PDF they link to is so obscured by a huge DRAFT stamp that it's pretty much unusable.) I've installed Java and apache-ant, and execute '# ant install', which churns and produces lots of output - It's supposed to launch an install wizard, which I never see, then it finally states install: [java] Java Result: 1 BUILD SUCCESSFUL Total time: 1 minute 10 seconds then I execute '# ant run', which produces lots of similar output, but then it exits with console: [echo] [echo] Service wrapper not currently supported on this platform (FreeBSD), so falling back to [echo] generic method. You will not have restart ability from the user interface and [echo] beware of using CTRL+C, it may leave processes running [echo] console-using-java: [java] Java Result: 1 BUILD SUCCESSFUL Total time: 54 seconds and nothing is running that I would expect to see. If anyone on this list has experience with it, I'd appreciate a bit of advice. Thanks, Kurt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 07:20:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E6616A417 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:20:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from outbound-mail-04.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-04.bluehost.com [69.89.21.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C748113C4E3 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:20:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 24718 invoked by uid 0); 16 Jan 2008 07:20:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box183.bluehost.com) (69.89.25.183) by mailproxy1.bluehost.com with SMTP; 16 Jan 2008 07:20:42 -0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=apotheon.net) by box183.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JF2Zm-0002GW-EH for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:20:42 -0700 Received: from 24.9.123.251 ([24.9.123.251]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user perrin@apotheon.com) by apotheon.net with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:20:42 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <60194.24.9.123.251.1200468042.squirrel@apotheon.net> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:20:42 -0700 (MST) From: perrin@apotheon.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.9a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Identified-User: {737:box183.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.net} {sentby:program running on server} Subject: ssmtp configuration for server authorization X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:20:43 -0000 I seem to be having some authorization problems with an SMTP server using ssmtp. I want to make sure the configuration is correct before I blame the problem on something else (like the company that runs the server). In the following ssmtp.conf file contents, assume these values for anything to the right of an equals sign: "user" is the mail account name "domain" is the domain for the SMTP server "password" is my password for the "user" mail account "laptop" is the hostname of my laptop, where I'm running ssmtp "local" is the local network name "mail" is the hostname of the SMTP server (and mail.domain.org is the FQDN) This is my ssmtp.conf: root=user@domain.org mailhub=mail.domain.org AuthUser=user@domain.org AuthPass=password rewriteDomain=domain.org hostname=laptop.local FromLineOverride=YES Is something missing or mis-specified? Did I misunderstand the purpose of one of those variables? Are some of those unusable with the FreeBSD version of ssmtp? Is there something else I should be doing for authorization on the SMTP server? Is something in the wrong order? Note that on the SMTP server the complete login name for that mail account is "user@domain.org", not just "user", according to the people managing the server. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 07:23:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A3616A417 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:23:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wundram@beenic.net) Received: from mail.beenic.net (mail.beenic.net [83.246.72.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D411E13C45A for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:23:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wundram@beenic.net) Received: from [192.168.1.32] (a89-182-2-100.net-htp.de [89.182.2.100]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.beenic.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C8E2A44529; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:15:49 +0100 (CET) From: "Heiko Wundram (Beenic)" Organization: Beenic Networks GmbH To: Chuck Swiger Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:23:47 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200801151013.20051.wundram@beenic.net> <410A0115-E23C-4163-B46F-826F8DC9FCBA@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <410A0115-E23C-4163-B46F-826F8DC9FCBA@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801160823.48265.wundram@beenic.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: Greylisting and Yahoo Mailinglists X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:23:02 -0000 Am Dienstag, 15. Januar 2008 19:08:39 schrieb Chuck Swiger: > You didn't mention which mailserver or greylist software you are > using, but the postgrey implementation (for use with Postfix) has this > in postgrey_whitelist_clients: > > # greylisting.org: Yahoo Groups servers (no retry) > scd.yahoo.com > > ...and you could choose to whitelist all of yahoo.com just as easily. I am using Postfix, but not postgrey, rather postfix-policyd, which does whitelisting of hosts based on IPs of the connecter. postfix-policyd comes with three blocks of IPs for the Yahoo Groups mailservers in the default whitelist, but none of the IPs I mentioned in my original mail falls into those groups. Sorry for underspecifying my requirements, but that's the reason I was asking specifically. I knew about the postgrey whitelist entry you mentioned. Thanks! -- Heiko Wundram Product & Application Development From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 07:34:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C0A16A421 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:34:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D7113C458 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:34:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from TEDSDESK (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id m0G7YLPL047226; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:34:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Heiko Wundram \(Beenic\)" , Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:35:21 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1914 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <200801151013.20051.wundram@beenic.net> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]); Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:34:22 -0800 (PST) Cc: Subject: RE: Greylisting and Yahoo Mailinglists X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:34:32 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Heiko Wundram > (Beenic) > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 1:13 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: OT: Greylisting and Yahoo Mailinglists > > > Hey all! > > A colleague of mine tracks a Yahoo mailing list, but always gets > mails from > them with a large delay (or not at all) due to our mailserver doing > greylisting. > > This comes from the fact that the triplet that represents a > message sent from > a Yahoo mailing list changes with every message (because the > envelope-sender > _always_ contains a unique ID to do bounce detection). > > Additionally, I can't seem to make out a set of "subnets" from which the > messages arrive; I've so far identified at least five subnets > that Yahoo uses > to send messages out (and I'm hesitant to add five subnets to the > whitelist, > especially when they're not closely related in any way as Yahoos > subnets seem > to be: 66.94.237, 66.163.168, 66.163.169, 69.147.103 and > 209.131.38 is what > I've seen so far from old messages at a quick glance). > > Anybody here have the same problem, and has rules for whitelisting Yahoo > mailing lists properly? > whois -h whois.arin.net xx.xx.xx.xx will tell you who the subnet is assigned to. If it is Yahoo then whitelist them, that's what the whitelist mechanism is there for. Yahoo has lots of subnets. You will have to find and add to your whitelist based on where the attempts come from. It is easy to write a simple awk/grep script that will give you those numbers all formatted up and ready to paste into your whitelist. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 07:39:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5497316A418 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:39:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from outbound-mail-04.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-04.bluehost.com [69.89.21.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A35F13C467 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:39:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 13182 invoked by uid 0); 16 Jan 2008 07:39:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box183.bluehost.com) (69.89.25.183) by mailproxy1.bluehost.com with SMTP; 16 Jan 2008 07:39:00 -0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=apotheon.net) by box183.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JF2rU-000590-M7 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:39:00 -0700 Received: from 24.9.123.251 ([24.9.123.251]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user perrin@apotheon.com) by apotheon.net with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:39:00 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <60390.24.9.123.251.1200469140.squirrel@apotheon.net> In-Reply-To: <60194.24.9.123.251.1200468042.squirrel@apotheon.net> References: <60194.24.9.123.251.1200468042.squirrel@apotheon.net> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:39:00 -0700 (MST) From: perrin@apotheon.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.9a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Identified-User: {737:box183.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.net} {sentby:program running on server} Subject: Re: ssmtp configuration for server authorization X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:39:01 -0000 > > This is my ssmtp.conf: (yadda yadda) I probably should have included a tail of my /var/log/maillog file: Jan 16 00:08:00 laptop sSMTP[6976]: Unable to connect to \ "mail.domain.org" port 25. Jan 16 00:08:00 laptop sSMTP[6976]: Cannot open mail.domain.org:25 As with the previous message, the server name and local hostname have been sanitized thus: "laptop" is the local machine using ssmtp "domain" is the domain of the email address and SMTP server From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 08:39:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC0C16A418 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:39:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bedekar.nilesh@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0375913C461 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:39:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bedekar.nilesh@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l15so159960rvb.43 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:39:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=8G+PnU32aCAmBrKEMQtZwJ5j24KNIUeym2O7B3zxBEU=; b=HrkQJhj+2rX/GbOLvcIQKVR4lTc1xQgL15cgQVbWdgbxX1QP+3JCpAn9MjP2irzHTlq/R8ebw5tiaRLmewZvDP28mnkEiwMTBlI/GoY1ilc1lk2OaakbvPMA8evwUQYLMQcd2zsaT1RQQ2G+G+vrWSxjyxz/HWVerjf2nqZ8xfA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=tP9yQ1esGkcnfBTAp43QmeV+ipYydamomMLp4UhD8CfCHz11JVFs2XaDTolNffrRjx1+pfsoha98HZtiaMcXakbydJGCYw0h/dbGST6gye/qOYijc3dpbzw82p+QrCkuHrdysv05CwghImYoW/ZoH6SNguj+KCPh3/6OD4bizeg= Received: by 10.141.18.14 with SMTP id v14mr330556rvi.252.1200471093523; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:11:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.134.5 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:11:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:41:33 +0530 From: "Nilesh Bedekar" To: questions@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Installation freezes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:39:58 -0000 I am trying to install FreeBSD 6.2 on my system with the following configuration : Intel Core2Duo 2.00 GHz Intel 945 Mother Board 1GB DDR2 Ram (Transcend) 160 GB SATA Western Digital Hard Drive Sony DVD-RW (IDE) Realtek RTL 8168 10/100 On-Board Ethernet Controller Realtek High Definition Audio (On-Board) When I boot using the FreeBSD_Install disc (Disc-1) the system goes to Welcome to FreeBSD and if I let it take the default choice of 1 then it goes through the Device Probing and then freezes at the following line md0:Preloaded Image 4423680 bytes at a hex address. Nothing happens after this and the system comes to a stand still. I would be really greatful if you resolve my issue or give me any advise that would help me to get around this issue. Thanks & Regards, Nilesh Bedekar. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 09:39:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C6016A418 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:39:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christopher.illies@ki.se) Received: from smtp2.ki.se (smtp2.ki.se [130.237.98.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F3D813C43E for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:39:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christopher.illies@ki.se) Received: from smtp2.ki.se (smtp2.ki.se [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 196B0534C8F; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:39:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from Klabautermann.ks.se (unknown [136.155.136.187]) by smtp2.ki.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A36C534E57; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:39:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from Klabautermann.ks.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Klabautermann.ks.se (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0G9ddCs092539; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:39:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from chris@Klabautermann.ks.se) Received: (from chris@localhost) by Klabautermann.ks.se (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m0G9dcDA092522; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:39:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from chris) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:39:38 +0100 From: Christopher Illies To: Timothy Bourke Message-ID: <20080116093938.GB3852@Klabautermann.ks.se> Mail-Followup-To: Timothy Bourke , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20080114110929.GB887@triptrop.cse.unsw.EDU.AU> <20080115105832.GA14265@Klabautermann.ks.se> <20080115114809.GA851@triptrop.cse.unsw.EDU.AU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080115114809.GA851@triptrop.cse.unsw.EDU.AU> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704, Antispam-Engine: 2.6.0.325393, Antispam-Data: 2008.1.16.12657 X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CD 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Reinterpret gamepad input as keyboeard input X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:39:15 -0000 On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:48:09PM +1100, Timothy Bourke wrote: > On Jan 15 at 11:58 +0100, Christopher Illies wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 10:09:30PM +1100, Timothy Bourke wrote: > > > On Jan 14 at 08:12 +0100, Christopher Illies wrote: > > > > I have a gamepad and would like to make certain gamepad actions to be > > > > seen as regular keyboard input. Is this possible? > > > > > > > > I tried out usbhidaction with something like: > > > > Generic_Desktop:Game_Pad.Button:Button_1 1 1 /bin/echo -n ls > > > > > > > > Obviously, this approach does not work as I hoped. "ls" is echoed in a > > > > shell window, but it is not interpreted as input. > > > > > > Would vkbd(4) do the trick? > > > > Thank you, vkbd sounds interesting. It looks like that there are no > > shell commands to create input to a virtual keyboard, so I will have > > to write my own. > > I don't know about that part of it. I looked at vkbd a long time ago > when trying to make a Super Nintendo controller driver work as a > keyboard. Vkbd almost did the trick, but it's intended to work from > user mode. > > It occurred to me, after my post, that if your script need only work > under X-windows, there are probably have more options for generating > keyboard events. You could, for example, look at x11/padkey, > particularly the doXKey() call. > > Best regards, > > Tim. Thanks for thank hint. I looked a bit into vkbd now and I also came across your post from February 2007. I agree, the fact that /dev/vkbdctl does not appear by default is confusing. Christopher From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 11:51:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92BEF16A41A for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:51:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from teemu.korhonen@mbnet.fi) Received: from hyatt.suomi.net (hyatt.suomi.net [82.128.152.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B10413C447 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:51:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from teemu.korhonen@mbnet.fi) Received: from taku.suomi.net ([82.128.154.66]) by hyatt.suomi.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JUQ00H7QI7JBZ30@hyatt.suomi.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:21:19 +0200 (EET) Received: from spam2.suomi.net (spam2.suomi.net [212.50.131.166]) by mailstore.suomi.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-4.01 (built Aug 3 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0JUQ00HZFI7J7340@mailstore.suomi.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:21:19 +0200 (EET) Received: from veneficus.koti.lan (85-23-19-26-Korvensuora-TR1.suomi.net [85.23.19.26]) by spam2.suomi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CC2C3394 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:20:45 +0200 (EET) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:20:44 +0200 From: Teemu Korhonen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <478DCC6C.8010605@mbnet.fi> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-OPOY-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the OPOY for more information X-OPOY-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-OPOY-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-0.866, required 5, autolearn=not spam, AWL -0.00, BAYES_00 -1.00, FORGED_RCVD_HELO 0.14) X-OPOY-MailScanner-From: teemu.korhonen@mbnet.fi User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071208) Subject: growfs and soft updates X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:51:49 -0000 I'm merging my ext2-partition with my /usr by shrinking ext2 and doing growfs on the free space. I did it with soft updates enabled and it seemed to work until I tried to use /usr which resulted in kernel panic (ffs_valloc: dup alloc). After plenty of 'fcsk -y' I got it fixed while losing few random files. :( The errors were mostly related to soft updates. Should soft updates be disabled before using growfs? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 08:10:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B6416A417 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:10:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from battah@msspal.com) Received: from mail.msspal.com (mail.msspal.com [217.66.233.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8348313C4E1 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:10:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from battah@msspal.com) Received: from shammout2f4c6f ([192.168.2.58]) by mail.msspal.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m0G6mt6C001316 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:48:55 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from battah@msspal.com) Message-Id: <200801160648.m0G6mt6C001316@mail.msspal.com> From: "Moazzar Battah" To: Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:46:02 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: AchYE9dsu6Nv2uDxRJuZvQASbNeUVw== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:16:50 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: some help please X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:10:24 -0000 Dear Sir, I need some help , I am a new user for Linux and freebsd so I need your help I need to know how to install the freebsd in the best way and how I can install the ports like gnome and openmail interface ? also I will be thankful if you send me the commands and what every command mean and how I can use it ? I already get in the directory /usr/ports/gnome2 & /usr/ports/www and make install and its start downloading but nothing happened after that installation done ??? I also need to now how to configure the hostname and ip addresses like local ip and fixed ip to trait the local lan and I real lan in the same way.. Thank u very much --------------------------------------------- Regards, Moazzer Battah IT Support Medical Supply & Services. Fax: 02-2959375 Tel : 02-2959372/1 Jawwal : 0598-919658 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 12:42:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A24CF16A477 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:42:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norman@apache.org) Received: from vs159071.vserver.de (hiphopcorner.de [62.75.159.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC6013C4E1 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:42:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norman@apache.org) Received: from [10.99.0.2] (unknown [213.188.107.182]) by vs159071.vserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90CF3BE85F8; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:22:32 +0000 (UTC) From: Norman Maurer To: Moazzar Battah In-Reply-To: <200801160648.m0G6mt6C001316@mail.msspal.com> References: <200801160648.m0G6mt6C001316@mail.msspal.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:22:25 +0100 Message-Id: <1200486145.28933.0.camel@norman-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: some help please X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:42:45 -0000 Hi, please reread the handbook.... I think all you need is explained there in detail bye Norman Am Mittwoch, den 16.01.2008, 09:46 +0200 schrieb Moazzar Battah: > Dear Sir, > > I need some help , I am a new user for Linux and freebsd so I need your help > I need to know how to install the freebsd in the best way and how I can > install the ports like gnome and openmail interface ? also I will be > thankful if you send me the commands and what every command mean and how I > can use it ? > > I already get in the directory /usr/ports/gnome2 & /usr/ports/www and make > install and its start downloading but nothing happened after that > installation done ??? > > I also need to now how to configure the hostname and ip addresses like local > ip and fixed ip to trait the local lan and I real lan in the same way.. > > Thank u very much > > > > --------------------------------------------- > > Regards, > > Moazzer Battah > > IT Support > > Medical Supply & Services. > > Fax: 02-2959375 > > Tel : 02-2959372/1 > > Jawwal : 0598-919658 > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 13:51:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA48616A468 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:51:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B653213C469 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:51:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A591EBC3B; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:51:48 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:51:47 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: "Moazzar Battah" Message-Id: <20080116085147.5be98c0a.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <200801160648.m0G6mt6C001316@mail.msspal.com> References: <200801160648.m0G6mt6C001316@mail.msspal.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: some help please X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:51:50 -0000 Everyone on this list is asking for help. If you use a more descriptive subject for your email, you'll get better answers. See: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/freebsd-questions/article.html In response to "Moazzar Battah" : > > I need some help , I am a new user for Linux and freebsd so I need your help > I need to know how to install the freebsd in the best way and how I can > install the ports like gnome and openmail interface ? also I will be > thankful if you send me the commands and what every command mean and how I > can use it ? The handbook has everything you need. If you get hung up on a specific step, please feel free to ask on this list. Unfortunately, it's impractical to present an entire walkthrough on the mailing list. Note that the FreeBSD handbook has many translations. Check to see if there is one in your native language: http://www.freebsd.org/docproj/translations.html There are also non-english mailing lists. One in your native language may make things easier for you, if it exists: http://www.freebsd.org/community/mailinglists.html > I already get in the directory /usr/ports/gnome2 & /usr/ports/www and make > install and its start downloading but nothing happened after that > installation done ??? You've got it installed, so that step is complete. Now you need to configure it. This section of the handbook should be helpful: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/x11-wm.html > I also need to now how to configure the hostname and ip addresses like local > ip and fixed ip to trait the local lan and I real lan in the same way.. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/config-network-setup.html -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 15:04:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 953BA16A417 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:04:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Albert.Shih@obspm.fr) Received: from mesiob.obspm.fr (mesiob.obspm.fr [145.238.2.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1734513C457 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:04:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Albert.Shih@obspm.fr) Received: from localhost (pcjas.obspm.fr [145.238.184.233]) by mesiob.obspm.fr (8.13.4/8.13.4/SIO Observatoire de Paris) with ESMTP id m0GF4tZe032688 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:04:57 +0100 Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:04:54 +0100 From: Albert Shih To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080116150454.GP89314@pcjas.obspm.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (mesiob.obspm.fr [145.238.2.2]); Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:04:57 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.92, clamav-milter version 0.92 on mesiob.obspm.fr X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: How manu swap ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Albert.Shih@obspm.fr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:04:59 -0000 Hi all I known it's classic question. Long time ago when I install a FreeBSD x86 32 bits when I have N Go of Ram the installer take 2xN Go for the swap partition. Now I just install two machine with FreeBSD amd64 version with 8Go of Ram and FreeBSD installer take 4 Go of swap. Is a bug in the installer or now FreeBSD don't need 2xRam of swap ? Regards. -- Albert SHIH Observatoire de Paris Meudon SIO batiment 15 Heure local/Local time: Mer 16 jan 2008 16:03:16 CET From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 15:33:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D445F16A41B for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:33:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from teemu.korhonen@mbnet.fi) Received: from astana.suomi.net (astana.suomi.net [82.128.152.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84FF513C469 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:33:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from teemu.korhonen@mbnet.fi) Received: from taku.suomi.net ([82.128.154.66]) by astana.suomi.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JUQ00C32RWD8WB0@astana.suomi.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:50:37 +0200 (EET) Received: from spam3.suomi.net (spam3.suomi.net [212.50.131.167]) by mailstore.suomi.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-4.01 (built Aug 3 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0JUQ0011ORWCFOF0@mailstore.suomi.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:50:37 +0200 (EET) Received: from veneficus.koti.lan (82-128-201-63-Korvensuora-TR1.suomi.net [82.128.201.63]) by spam3.suomi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DFF922FAB0 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:34:31 +0200 (EET) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:34:27 +0200 From: Teemu Korhonen In-reply-to: <478DCC6C.8010605@mbnet.fi> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <478E15F3.7090809@mbnet.fi> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-DNA-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DNA-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DNA-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (SpamAssassin rebuilding) X-DNA-MailScanner-From: teemu.korhonen@mbnet.fi References: <478DCC6C.8010605@mbnet.fi> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071208) X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Re: growfs and soft updates X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:33:22 -0000 Teemu Korhonen wrote: > I'm merging my ext2-partition with my /usr by shrinking ext2 and doing > growfs on the free space. I did it with soft updates enabled and it > seemed to work until I tried to use /usr which resulted in kernel > panic (ffs_valloc: dup alloc). After plenty of 'fcsk -y' I got it > fixed while losing few random files. :( The errors were mostly related > to soft updates. > > Should soft updates be disabled before using growfs? > False alarm. It's all the same with soft updates disabled.. I guess growfs needs some work. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 15:43:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB1A116A417 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:43:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wodfer@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E81613C459 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:43:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wodfer@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so440682pyb.10 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:43:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=DE7ffa0x6oWFi2tweECf/M9bimXWPR8Vx8WR/qhpJMo=; b=gza4FakKC1R4Z9TcuwvQekUU7TuokJT7CVQzgO1k0CP5Fk09CSxa52PufaD/B9jO+YwXpTlU+Ad4OzTQQejHSodk3cO3/KrWGTbGHDATR7EOXMq9plSei9vsU+wjye4Jvl69fom+70Dr67WxdSc8QCf+hKaAQfifqsjBLxHSIIc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=QHdOQODgzbXWrlTxsdXHP/OQ0dZJ2xE74lC2NAZoXYo7Z3q8vT/L+5of13sGyf6O2+rmWq+Kd75Tbhjwer0agStGCuWeB2r5u2oeN5XXpwwVbxmw/130jdQjMwCSnwTWUAxDqnpvdulqEaAifppXURS6n7DyJ5LicsfjVL487rs= Received: by 10.141.18.14 with SMTP id v14mr604854rvi.252.1200496437046; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:13:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.87.7 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:13:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <23ed14b80801160713q10606d2es21e869f935b22257@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:13:57 +0100 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_Wider=F8e_Andersen?=" To: "Valerio Daelli" In-Reply-To: <27dbfc8c0711210555h1a862f5drccb1a6f5bcb1a837@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <23ed14b80711210539w4bed1enc180f8e32ec76881@mail.gmail.com> <27dbfc8c0711210555h1a862f5drccb1a6f5bcb1a837@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Need help with backup shell script X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:43:01 -0000 On Nov 21, 2007 2:55 PM, Valerio Daelli wrote: > On Nov 21, 2007 2:39 PM, Andreas Wider=F8e Andersen > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm working on a shell script that will let me attach (mount) an > > external USB 2.0 harddrive and to my FreeBSD 6.2 server and perform a > > full backup of /backup on my server (all files and subfolders) once or > > twice a week (whenever I run the cronjob). The script must be able to > > run through a cronjob and the drive must be mounted and unmounted > > after each job (I will swap between two drives of the same type and > > size). The script must also remove folders/files older than 30 days. > > > > Does anyone use a script like this today that they can share? I'm not > > a shell scripter myself so any help is highly appreciated. > > > > Here's my rough idea/sketch: > > > > #! /bin/sh > > > > $MOUNT =3D /external > > $DATE=3D date_today > > > > mount usb_drive $MOUNT > > cd /$MOUNT > > rm all files forlders older than 30 days > > mkdir /$DATE > > cp -fr /backup to /$MOUNT/$DATE > > cd > > unmount > > > > > --- > #!/bin/sh > > MOUNT=3D/external > DATE=3D`date +%Y%m%d%H%M` > > mount /dev/da2 $MOUNT #Change device name > find $MOUNT -mtime +30 -delete > mkdir $MOUNT/$DATE > cp -rp /backup/* $MOUNT/$DATE > umount /external > --- > > Bye > > Valerio Daelli > Hi again and thanks for the replies to my question. I have finally rebuilt world and compiled a new kernel since I didn't have USB support and SCSI/da support in my previous kernel. I have also used you= r suggestion and created this script that I can run from command line or as a cronjob: #!/bin/sh MOUNT=3D/external DATE=3D`date +%Y%m%d%H%M` mount /dev/da0 $MOUNT #Change device name find $MOUNT -mtime +30 -delete mkdir $MOUNT/$DATE rsync -rlpgoD /backup/ $MOUNT/$DATE umount /external dmesg shows: umass0: Generic USB Storage Device, rev 2.00/0.00, addr 2 umass0: Get Max Lun not supported (TIMEOUT) da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da0: 1.000MB/s transfers da0: 476940MB (976773168 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 60801C) When I try to run my script I get this prompt back: mount: /dev/da0 on /external: incorrect super block (allthough the script seems to continue to run). Am I doing something wrong here or do I need to I need to use one of the other from /dev: ls -la /dev [snip] crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 92 Jan 12 03:42 da0 crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 93 Jan 12 03:28 da0s1 crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 98 Jan 12 03:28 da0s1c crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 99 Jan 12 03:28 da0s1d Thanks for any help here! Best regards, Andreas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 15:53:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0937B16A468 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:53:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jalmberg@identry.com) Received: from mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.4.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D323513C45B for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:53:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jalmberg@identry.com) Received: from [192.168.1.110] (ool-4b7f8e42.static.optonline.net [75.127.142.66]) by mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTP id <0JUQ00MEXUSDQNY0@mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:53:04 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:53:01 -0500 From: John Almberg In-reply-to: <200801160254.m0G2skn2022882@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <6FF7BE89-140E-4D61-9FB3-247F88A42998@identry.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <87A9631B-EAC5-41B8-B4C2-001C3ADBA486@identry.com> <200801150237.m0F2bqEg000116@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <360AB6AE-B3C1-4CA6-AFC1-378B48B3C6DF@identry.com> <200801160254.m0G2skn2022882@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Subject: Re: No spam??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:53:05 -0000 >> 2008-01-14 09:30:37.074087500 rblsmtpd: 123.20.89.67 pid 72121: 451 >> http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=123.20.89.67 > > Just one comment, in my installation of SpamAssassin, it reports in > syslog as spamd, not at rblsmtpd. This looks like logs from the > rblsmtpd program that is not SpamAssasin. > > As some one mentionned, one way to prevent false positive and too > agressive black lists is to use them through SpamAssassin only, where > the black list score is only part of the spaminess. The draw back is > that it puts more load the server and SpamAssassin that has to > scrutinize every email, while dropping at the SMTP level is fast and > uses very low resources. > Ah... I see. Yes, you are correct. It is rblsmtpd that is doing the filtering. One of my goals with this mail server set up (primarily pf, qmail, spamassassin, maildrop, courier) was to minimize processing, since my last set up got totally bogged down handling my, and my client's email, frequently running with a load of 8 or more with several spam per second. A real drag. This set up runs at a much lower load, and seems to do a better job filtering spam. -- John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 16:21:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B913D16A417 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:21:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78AC713C455 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:21:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m0GGIvvx087250; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:18:57 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m0GGIvJ1087249; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:18:57 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:18:57 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Albert Shih Message-ID: <20080116161856.GD86844@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20080116150454.GP89314@pcjas.obspm.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080116150454.GP89314@pcjas.obspm.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How manu swap ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:21:14 -0000 On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 04:04:54PM +0100, Albert Shih wrote: > Hi all > > I known it's classic question. > > Long time ago when I install a FreeBSD x86 32 bits when I have N Go of Ram > the installer take 2xN Go for the swap partition. > > Now I just install two machine with FreeBSD amd64 version with 8Go of Ram > and FreeBSD installer take 4 Go of swap. > > Is a bug in the installer or now FreeBSD don't need 2xRam of swap ? Hmmmm. I doubt that it is a "bug" per se. I wonder if there is a maximum size for swap compiled in somewhere. Is your system set up correctly to actually access all 8GB of ram? Anyway, you can get by with less than 2Xram. It depends a lot on what you are running and how many processes. I would like to have more than 1Xram though - at least 1.25xram. So with 8GB, I would want to have at least 10GB swap. Hopefully someone else will be able to answer with something more specific and helpful. ////jerry > > Regards. > > -- > Albert SHIH > Observatoire de Paris Meudon > SIO batiment 15 > Heure local/Local time: > Mer 16 jan 2008 16:03:16 CET > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 16:28:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D67016A420 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:28:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D941113C455 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:28:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) id m0GGS6it028317; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:28:06 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:28:06 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Albert Shih Message-ID: <20080116162805.GH97708@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20080116150454.GP89314@pcjas.obspm.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080116150454.GP89314@pcjas.obspm.fr> X-OS: FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How manu swap ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:28:08 -0000 In the last episode (Jan 16), Albert Shih said: > Hi all > > I known it's classic question. > > Long time ago when I install a FreeBSD x86 32 bits when I have N Go > of Ram the installer take 2xN Go for the swap partition. > > Now I just install two machine with FreeBSD amd64 version with 8Go of > Ram and FreeBSD installer take 4 Go of swap. > > Is a bug in the installer or now FreeBSD don't need 2xRam of swap ? When was the last time you saw your swap partition with more than 2GB in use? On an 8GB system, you probably will either never have enough processes to require swapping at all, or you will have one or two processes so big that if they ever swap, it's a sign you need more RAM, not more swap :) In systems with that much RAM, swap is pretty much only used for crashdumps, and with minidumps enabled by default, you don't need much. On small systems, the 2x-swap rule was because once you allocated enough processes to require that much swap, you were pretty much thrashing your system anyway. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 16:35:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4895F16A418 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:35:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Albert.Shih@obspm.fr) Received: from mesiob.obspm.fr (mesiob.obspm.fr [145.238.2.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1A3413C457 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:35:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Albert.Shih@obspm.fr) Received: from localhost (pcjas.obspm.fr [145.238.184.233]) by mesiob.obspm.fr (8.13.4/8.13.4/SIO Observatoire de Paris) with ESMTP id m0GGZdl2031815; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:35:40 +0100 Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:35:39 +0100 From: Albert Shih To: Jerry McAllister Message-ID: <20080116163539.GU89314@pcjas.obspm.fr> References: <20080116150454.GP89314@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20080116161856.GD86844@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20080116161856.GD86844@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (mesiob.obspm.fr [145.238.2.2]); Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:35:40 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.92, clamav-milter version 0.92 on mesiob.obspm.fr X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How manu swap ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Albert.Shih@obspm.fr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:35:42 -0000 Le 16/01/2008 11:18:57-0500, Jerry McAllister a crit > On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 04:04:54PM +0100, Albert Shih wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > I known it's classic question. > > > > Long time ago when I install a FreeBSD x86 32 bits when I have N Go of Ram > > the installer take 2xN Go for the swap partition. > > > > Now I just install two machine with FreeBSD amd64 version with 8Go of Ram > > and FreeBSD installer take 4 Go of swap. > > > > Is a bug in the installer or now FreeBSD don't need 2xRam of swap ? > > Hmmmm. I doubt that it is a "bug" per se. I wonder if there is > a maximum size for swap compiled in somewhere. Is your system set > up correctly to actually access all 8GB of ram? Yes... Mem: 8064K Active, 6076K Inact, 68M Wired, 8896K Buf, 7829M Free Swap: 4096M Total, 4096M Free and the second machine Mem: 12M Active, 561M Inact, 322M Wired, 12K Cache, 214M Buf, 15G Free Swap: 4096M Total, 4096M Free Regards. JAS -- Albert SHIH Observatoire de Paris Meudon SIO batiment 15 Heure local/Local time: Mer 16 jan 2008 17:34:40 CET From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 16:37:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC4C016A475 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:37:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Albert.Shih@obspm.fr) Received: from mesiob.obspm.fr (mesiob.obspm.fr [145.238.2.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 710F713C4EC for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:37:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Albert.Shih@obspm.fr) Received: from localhost (pcjas.obspm.fr [145.238.184.233]) by mesiob.obspm.fr (8.13.4/8.13.4/SIO Observatoire de Paris) with ESMTP id m0GGb1Fi032292; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:37:01 +0100 Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:37:01 +0100 From: Albert Shih To: Dan Nelson Message-ID: <20080116163701.GV89314@pcjas.obspm.fr> References: <20080116150454.GP89314@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20080116162805.GH97708@dan.emsphone.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20080116162805.GH97708@dan.emsphone.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (mesiob.obspm.fr [145.238.2.2]); Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:37:01 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.92, clamav-milter version 0.92 on mesiob.obspm.fr X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How manu swap ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Albert.Shih@obspm.fr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:37:17 -0000 Le 16/01/2008 10:28:06-0600, Dan Nelson a crit > In the last episode (Jan 16), Albert Shih said: > > Hi all > > > > I known it's classic question. > > > > Long time ago when I install a FreeBSD x86 32 bits when I have N Go > > of Ram the installer take 2xN Go for the swap partition. > > > > Now I just install two machine with FreeBSD amd64 version with 8Go of > > Ram and FreeBSD installer take 4 Go of swap. > > > > Is a bug in the installer or now FreeBSD don't need 2xRam of swap ? > > When was the last time you saw your swap partition with more than 2GB > in use? On an 8GB system, you probably will either never have enough > processes to require swapping at all, or you will have one or two > processes so big that if they ever swap, it's a sign you need more RAM, > not more swap :) In systems with that much RAM, swap is pretty much > only used for crashdumps, and with minidumps enabled by default, you OK. I never need this because FreeBSD never crash....well more specific : I never see FreeBSD crash and event it's crash I not qualify to use crashdumps ;-) > don't need much. On small systems, the 2x-swap rule was because once > you allocated enough processes to require that much swap, you were > pretty much thrashing your system anyway. OK. Thanks for your answer. Regards. -- Albert SHIH Observatoire de Paris Meudon SIO batiment 15 Heure local/Local time: Mer 16 jan 2008 17:35:44 CET From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 16:42:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EDFD16A41B for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:42:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jimbow@darq.net) Received: from farnborough.darq.net (fab.darq.net [82.136.41.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D66113C468 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:42:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jimbow@darq.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by farnborough.darq.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 039231D04E for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:43:10 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at darq.net Received: from farnborough.darq.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (farnborough.darq.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S4boWoZX7r9H for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:43:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from troop.darq.net (hackney.darq.net [78.86.112.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zygis@darq.net) by farnborough.darq.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C4C41CF2E for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:43:05 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <478E3403.6040609@darq.net> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:42:43 +0000 From: Jim Bow User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071004) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions References: <23ed14b80711210539w4bed1enc180f8e32ec76881@mail.gmail.com> <27dbfc8c0711210555h1a862f5drccb1a6f5bcb1a837@mail.gmail.com> <23ed14b80801160713q10606d2es21e869f935b22257@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <23ed14b80801160713q10606d2es21e869f935b22257@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Need help with backup shell script X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:42:50 -0000 Andreas Widere Andersen wrote: > #!/bin/sh > > MOUNT=/external > DATE=`date +%Y%m%d%H%M` > > mount /dev/da0 $MOUNT #Change device name > find $MOUNT -mtime +30 -delete > mkdir $MOUNT/$DATE > rsync -rlpgoD /backup/ $MOUNT/$DATE > umount /external > > When I try to run my script I get this prompt back: > > mount: /dev/da0 on /external: incorrect super block This fails because you are trying to mount the raw(?) drive and mount is unable to detect what file system it is (by looking at the partition's super block). > Am I doing something wrong here or do I need to I need to use one of the > other from /dev: You want to use /dev/da0s1d - the main partition on slice 1 on the drive. Sorry, I dont remember the explanation as to why you must use da0s1d instead of da0s1c, but it goes something along the lines of c partition being a shorthand notation for the entire slice, whereas letter d marks the first partition on the slice. Maybe someone here can clarify this? Hope this helps. Jim Bow From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 16:45:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2954516A418 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:45:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79EC513C469 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:45:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0GGiAtm001445; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:44:10 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0GGi6sb001442; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:44:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:44:06 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Albert Shih In-Reply-To: <20080116150454.GP89314@pcjas.obspm.fr> Message-ID: <20080116174300.V1425@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20080116150454.GP89314@pcjas.obspm.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How manu swap ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:45:59 -0000 none if your ram will always fit all apps (with 8GB is more than likely), or at least size of your memory, more if needed. but you can't give too much swap! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 16:54:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 976B516A41A for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:54:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5745C13C474 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:54:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B267EBC3B; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:54:41 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:54:40 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: Albert.Shih@obspm.fr Message-Id: <20080116115440.6510872c.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20080116163701.GV89314@pcjas.obspm.fr> References: <20080116150454.GP89314@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20080116162805.GH97708@dan.emsphone.com> <20080116163701.GV89314@pcjas.obspm.fr> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Dan Nelson , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How manu swap ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:54:42 -0000 In response to Albert Shih : > Le 16/01/2008 =E0 10:28:06-0600, Dan Nelson a =E9crit > > In the last episode (Jan 16), Albert Shih said: > > > Hi all > > >=20 > > > I known it's classic question.=20 > > >=20 > > > Long time ago when I install a FreeBSD x86 32 bits when I have N Go > > > of Ram the installer take 2xN Go for the swap partition. > > >=20 > > > Now I just install two machine with FreeBSD amd64 version with 8Go of > > > Ram and FreeBSD installer take 4 Go of swap. > > >=20 > > > Is a bug in the installer or now FreeBSD don't need 2xRam of swap ? > >=20 > > When was the last time you saw your swap partition with more than 2GB > > in use? On an 8GB system, you probably will either never have enough > > processes to require swapping at all, or you will have one or two > > processes so big that if they ever swap, it's a sign you need more RAM, > > not more swap :) In systems with that much RAM, swap is pretty much > > only used for crashdumps, and with minidumps enabled by default, you This is really a pretty narrow view of things. * Swap _can_ be used to extend a systems usability beyond what it was originally designed for. If you don't exceed the physical RAM by too great a margin, allowing a few little-used processes to page out while heavy use processes use all available memory is not a big performance hit. * The idea that an 8G system will never use all that RAM is laughable to me. I can easily create applications that eat up 8G of RAM, legitimately. * In the event that something unexpected happens, having a lot of swap can save your ass by causing the system to slow down instead of kill processe= s. * Disk space is cheap. 16G of swap costs what? 15G of 15,000 RPM SCSI hard drive space costs $40 -- not much for piece of mind. * Of course, the crash dumps that are mentioned. I agree, though, that swap isn't what it used to be. Nobody uses it as supplemental RAM any more as far as I can tell. It's pretty much just a safety net nowadays. --=20 Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 16:55:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA26D16A41A for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:55:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1F5C13C458 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:55:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m0GGrCmi087770; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:53:12 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m0GGrCWV087769; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:53:12 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:53:12 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Dan Nelson Message-ID: <20080116165312.GC87571@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20080116150454.GP89314@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20080116162805.GH97708@dan.emsphone.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080116162805.GH97708@dan.emsphone.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Albert Shih , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How manu swap ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:55:31 -0000 On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 10:28:06AM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Jan 16), Albert Shih said: > > Hi all > > > > I known it's classic question. > > > > Long time ago when I install a FreeBSD x86 32 bits when I have N Go > > of Ram the installer take 2xN Go for the swap partition. > > > > Now I just install two machine with FreeBSD amd64 version with 8Go of > > Ram and FreeBSD installer take 4 Go of swap. > > > > Is a bug in the installer or now FreeBSD don't need 2xRam of swap ? > > When was the last time you saw your swap partition with more than 2GB > in use? On an 8GB system, you probably will either never have enough > processes to require swapping at all, or you will have one or two > processes so big that if they ever swap, it's a sign you need more RAM, > not more swap :) In systems with that much RAM, swap is pretty much > only used for crashdumps, and with minidumps enabled by default, you > don't need much. On small systems, the 2x-swap rule was because once > you allocated enough processes to require that much swap, you were > pretty much thrashing your system anyway. Don't forget that the system uses swap space to do paging too and that frequently used processes can end up in swap and be run from there faster than from regular disk. But, yes, the 2X rule was generally a combination of space for crash-dump plus room to run more than memory can hold. ////jerry > > -- > Dan Nelson > dnelson@allantgroup.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 17:02:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB4316A419 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:02:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bv@bilver.wjv.com) Received: from wjv.com (fl-65-40-24-38.sta.embarqhsd.net [65.40.24.38]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA7DA13C4E7 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:02:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bv@bilver.wjv.com) Received: from bilver.wjv.com (localhost.wjv.com [127.0.0.1]) by wjv.com (8.14.2/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m0GH2qrA071928 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:02:52 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bv@bilver.wjv.com) Received: (from bv@localhost) by bilver.wjv.com (8.14.2/8.13.1/Submit) id m0GH2lJY071927 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:02:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bv) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:02:47 -0500 From: Bill Vermillion To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080116170247.GB71078@wjv.com> References: <20080116120019.6796316A47E@hub.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080116120019.6796316A47E@hub.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Organization: W.J.Vermillion / Orlando - Winter Park ReplyTo: bv@wjv.com X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on bilver.wjv.com Subject: Re: Limit on number of groups a user can join X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bv@wjv.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:02:56 -0000 Even though on Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:00 freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org realized that everything he says should be taken 'cum grano salis', he unhesitatingly continued with this missive: > Message: 4 > Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:13:04 -0800 > From: Chuck Swiger > Subject: Re: Limit on number of groups a user can join > On Jan 15, 2008, at 3:01 PM, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > > I made some tries removing him from other groups and I got to > > the conclusion that it works as long as he is in no more than > > 15 groups, but breaks when he join the 16th. Is this an hard > > limit? Can it be extended? Why this? > This limit is somewhat historical but cannot easily be changed > because this max # is hard-coded into the NFS protocol, which > needs to describe which groups a user belongs to. If you're not > using NFS, you might try changing the declaration of KI_NGROUPS > in /usr/src/sys/ user.h and build a new kernel, I believe.... > -Chuck I don't know if this will work in FreeBSD as I don't have anyone in that many gruops. I did run across this limit in a commercail System V a few years back.. As I recall I added another line to the group file using the same group number and that fixed that problem. It may be worth a try. Bill -- Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 17:03:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D54C16A46B for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:03:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joeyea323@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.246]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04BA713C447 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:03:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joeyea323@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so79791anc.13 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:03:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=Iq4uaAFLPbnFIbfcjOEMEUpcv9wS6/SLsVHX3dYY/FA=; b=MmU2fOEb+iaOcdEl54XiBNn91Jf7SVRPcu8gtdyQ6HTJb9n1ihT/9vyDCPg3EILBe98e6txoEddC0XFQKi0iqsV+zULeDzX8qHBwDIafcD/pacde6+MRti6YmkM3sgauATHT6BuZzyCNgdl0YWSGQduYPd41JgsYseZUQqlihq8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=TG7Df5SPgPT/NzPyoibxCw+TdVynXDoYfBp0XqWn2kF18w8s/tTaeJ03pJO5c7ciR6pyPpICPIum8mygmueXR/1f6OLTcewk7DhDZPV14BH3FFunEHzEcmUedRq1l4n4fLhmes+7ulxC5rymhYJXbhPi0wNTGAcVkgOEbr+qn6s= Received: by 10.100.202.9 with SMTP id z9mr2093685anf.16.1200501442280; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:37:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.196.13 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:37:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <44f12db00801160837w4e8987e2jb87d7d60c2704788@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:37:22 -0500 From: "Joseph Yeager" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: FreeBSD 6.2 Frequent Lockups X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:03:55 -0000 Hello, I'm experiencing daily lockups on a FreeBSD 6.2 machine thats currently being used as a gateway for a local church school. I have installed and/or configured the following services which are running on it right now: Quagga (only using the Zebra daemon), DHCP (via the isc-dhcp3-server port), BIND, and PF. Everything runs as expected except for the fact that the machine will completely freeze (console included) quite often. Its recently gotten as bad as freezing every 3-5 hours. I don't have any custom cron jobs running and the only job I see that operates at that frequency is daily maintenance. Thinking it could be a heat problem originating from sitting on top of a switch, I put a few blocks under and now it runs a good bit cooler. Last night, I had the windows open and it never got hotter then luke warm and I witnessed, first hand, it completely freeze for no apparent reason. Despite that seemingly pointing to it NOT being a heat problem, I'll be moving it to a shelf by itself. I will also be swapping out the RAM in a few hours when I get up there to see if that is the problem, but I still have a feeling (after reading other similar problems like this) that that may not be the answer. I have a similar setup running at my home which uses the exact same motherboard but different RAM and HD. The only difference on my home router is that I have split horizon DNS setup for my domain and am using IPFW as opposed to PF. My home router has been rock solid every since I got it (several months ago) and my email and webserver, which both run FreeBSD 6.2, have never been down except for extended power outages. I will update you on how the RAM swap goes, but if there are any other suggestions you have I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks, Joe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 17:20:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7122B16A421 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:20:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 953EC13C43E for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:20:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0GGolHR001479 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:50:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0GGmiuv001453; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:50:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:48:44 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Teemu Korhonen In-Reply-To: <478E15F3.7090809@mbnet.fi> Message-ID: <20080116174455.H1425@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <478DCC6C.8010605@mbnet.fi> <478E15F3.7090809@mbnet.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: growfs and soft updates X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:20:24 -0000 >> (ffs_valloc: dup alloc). After plenty of 'fcsk -y' I got it fixed while >> losing few random files. :( The errors were mostly related to soft updates. >> >> Should soft updates be disabled before using growfs? >> > > False alarm. It's all the same with soft updates disabled.. I guess growfs > needs some work. ALWAYS fsck after growfs. growfs is crappy at least, zero out the new space before growfs, but just if you can - simply backup data somewhere and use newfs. growfs is for people that like challenges ;) i have to use it growing 800GB filesystem to 1400GB, finally (after patching it a bit) i did it, but root directory was destroyed (no idea why). all subdirs appeared in lost+found so it wasn't a big problem then+i've got zero sized file in lost+found that i was unable to delete until i took off all strange flash with chflags. but i did it ONLY because i had no way to back it up. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 17:28:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E5D16A41A for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:28:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.bluestop.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:41c8:1:548a::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34DE913C442 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:28:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from [IPv6:2a01:348:10f:0:213a:ffc2:e142:33d9] (unknown [IPv6:2a01:348:10f:0:213a:ffc2:e142:33d9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.bluestop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C583031E; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:28:19 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <478E3E98.10001@cran.org.uk> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:27:52 +0000 From: Bruce Cran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Nelson References: <20080116150454.GP89314@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20080116162805.GH97708@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20080116162805.GH97708@dan.emsphone.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Albert Shih , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How manu swap ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:28:21 -0000 Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Jan 16), Albert Shih said: > >> Hi all >> >> I known it's classic question. >> >> Long time ago when I install a FreeBSD x86 32 bits when I have N Go >> of Ram the installer take 2xN Go for the swap partition. >> >> Now I just install two machine with FreeBSD amd64 version with 8Go of >> Ram and FreeBSD installer take 4 Go of swap. >> >> Is a bug in the installer or now FreeBSD don't need 2xRam of swap ? >> > > When was the last time you saw your swap partition with more than 2GB > in use? On an 8GB system, you probably will either never have enough > processes to require swapping at all, or you will have one or two > processes so big that if they ever swap, it's a sign you need more RAM, > not more swap :) In systems with that much RAM, swap is pretty much > only used for crashdumps, and with minidumps enabled by default, you > don't need much. On small systems, the 2x-swap rule was because once > you allocated enough processes to require that much swap, you were > pretty much thrashing your system anyway I've read that the VM system in FreeBSD is optimized such that if you do start swapping it'll work best if your swap space is at least 2x RAM. Is that still valid on recent releases of FreeBSD? -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 17:43:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7498716A418 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:43:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greenwood.andy@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 295D313C4D5 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:43:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greenwood.andy@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so553061waf.3 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:43:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=hNEvOasqvhgBlJqkrUrFqFKYiCU+mpOgJqmcBaAplao=; b=l/6AN18WopdaPxUEk2DJA9vZ2QSRVYcecjhO4XGzYAhdo+gVyZiRoCQSHf29Htogi8obzbHKnqQKRMzUEaKib5G34gW0Sl0epz7OsWJZVUlKTLMNoKfS7RLFVo+rAyjmSXK1xXTvNpef8Zs0C23EuTMCIwxatRNSfUKzFBxMTLg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=nnsJw2XwVbi3JdvNmCD5sbsEDGOpTNn+hO+/Us50G/cI+DfT4HnXgE86VtqYRjqW12ds2Ehk+y6tBzliKujk5chFOLYliSCoQ4D7gAhFrzcyq2UnpzU82VSQLQY4Xts5Qr3qHQ7kcbmlzv2Wm2b0nj7EOqrsuzkowOoj8c4zDwo= Received: by 10.114.158.1 with SMTP id g1mr1173132wae.97.1200503894816; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:18:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.94.13 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:18:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3ee9ca710801160918y510770d2vd74565fedfd1e14@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:18:14 -0500 From: "Andy Greenwood" To: "FreeBSD Questions" In-Reply-To: <20080113012729.GI1965@woodstock.nethamilton.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <47879080.6040208@gmail.com> <53AFE19A-173F-43AC-BF68-972FFD12029E@goldmark.org> <20080113012729.GI1965@woodstock.nethamilton.net> Cc: Jon Hamilton Subject: Re: syslogd not reading messages from a remote machine X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:43:43 -0000 [snip] > To disable that behavior, just put -a 10.10.10.1/32:* in your syslogd_flags > and you should be good to go (if your problem was the same as mine :) > Thanks, that helped a lot. for the record, I had to set the syslogd_flags as Jon described, as well as adding "+@" and "+fortigate" lines to syslog.conf above the local and remote sections respectively. Leaving those lines out resulted in the logs getting appended to /var/log/messages in addition to the logfile I wanted them to go to. Thanks again everyone! -- -- I'm nerdy in the extreme and whiter than sour cream From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 17:48:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE4A616A469 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:48:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B361B13C4D9 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:48:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay11.apple.com (relay11.apple.com [17.128.113.48]) by mail-out3.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DCE71E3AE8F; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:48:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay11.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay11.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 58E9A28057; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:48:22 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 11807130-a3c39bb0000028a7-9c-478e43660ddd Received: from cswiger1.apple.com (cswiger1.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay11.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 3254528080; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:48:22 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <288C5238-D420-4E52-953F-20E532748CFD@mac.com> From: Chuck Swiger To: Heiko Wundram (Beenic) In-Reply-To: <200801160823.48265.wundram@beenic.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:48:21 -0800 References: <200801151013.20051.wundram@beenic.net> <410A0115-E23C-4163-B46F-826F8DC9FCBA@mac.com> <200801160823.48265.wundram@beenic.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: Greylisting and Yahoo Mailinglists X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:48:22 -0000 On Jan 15, 2008, at 11:23 PM, Heiko Wundram (Beenic) wrote: > Am Dienstag, 15. Januar 2008 19:08:39 schrieb Chuck Swiger: >> You didn't mention which mailserver or greylist software you are >> using, but the postgrey implementation (for use with Postfix) has >> this >> in postgrey_whitelist_clients: >> >> # greylisting.org: Yahoo Groups servers (no retry) >> scd.yahoo.com >> >> ...and you could choose to whitelist all of yahoo.com just as easily. > > I am using Postfix, but not postgrey, rather postfix-policyd, which > does > whitelisting of hosts based on IPs of the connecter. postfix-policyd > comes > with three blocks of IPs for the Yahoo Groups mailservers in the > default > whitelist, but none of the IPs I mentioned in my original mail falls > into > those groups. OK. I use policy-weightd also; it doesn't greylist entries precisely, but instead does RBL lookups and some checking of forward and reverse DNS lookups, and then caches those results for a while. It will do a good job of rejecting people claiming to send mail from a Yahoo account if they do not use a mailserver in the yahoo.com domain: Jan 16 03:21:52 pi postfix/smtpd[47289]: connect from unknown[201.210.144.157] Jan 16 03:21:54 pi postfix/policyd-weight[4912]: decided action=450 temporarily blocked because of previous errors - retrying too fast. penalty: 30 seconds x 0 retries.; delay: 0s Jan 16 03:21:54 pi postfix/smtpd[47289]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[201.210.144.157]: 450 : Recipient address rejected: temporarily blocked because of previous errors - retrying too fast. penalty: 30 seconds x 0 retries.; from=< tequila301@yahoo.com> to= proto=ESMTP helo= Jan 16 03:21:55 pi postfix/smtpd[47289]: lost connection after DATA from unknown[201.210.144.157] ...but almost always, this is forged email being sent as spam to accounts which don't exist in my local domain, so it seems to be doing the right thing here. > Sorry for underspecifying my requirements, but that's the reason I > was asking > specifically. I knew about the postgrey whitelist entry you mentioned. Right. Well, if you have some sample log lines from a known legit sender which were being blocked, that would be helpful... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 18:14:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33A0416A418 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:14:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@stigascorp.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD75713C43E for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:14:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@stigascorp.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so502760pyb.10 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:14:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.212.3 with SMTP id o3mr2308516qbq.30.1200505819115; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:50:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.105.12 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:50:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <75988d070801160950h5a256927y6415f154114767be@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:50:19 -0500 From: "FreeBSD User" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: When is 7.0 being released? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:14:22 -0000 Hello, Does anybody have an idea when 7.0 will be released? It looks like the schedule hasn't been updated, and it was scheduled for January 14th. Where can I find additional information? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 18:37:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7B216A418 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:37:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+SG=f5d1ccb8@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from turtle-out.mxes.net (turtle-out.mxes.net [216.86.168.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7106C13C469 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:37:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+SG=f5d1ccb8@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by turtle-in.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F382A164668 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:15:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF2DD05B8 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:15:49 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:15:44 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080116181544.787f2d17@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20080116174455.H1425@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <478DCC6C.8010605@mbnet.fi> <478E15F3.7090809@mbnet.fi> <20080116174455.H1425@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.5; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: growfs and soft updates X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:37:01 -0000 On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:48:44 +0100 (CET) Wojciech Puchar wrote: > growfs is for people that like challenges ;) > > i have to use it growing 800GB filesystem to 1400GB, finally (after > patching it a bit) i did it, but root directory was destroyed (no > idea why). all subdirs appeared in lost+found so it wasn't a big > problem then+i've got zero sized file in lost+found that i was unable > to delete until i took off all strange flash with chflags. > > but i did it ONLY because i had no way to back it up. Personally I don't think it's worth the risk, unless the data is disposable like a squid cache. What I normally do is create a new partition and symlink things into it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 18:46:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC9F16A41A for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:46:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp3.utdallas.edu (smtp3.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DDAE13C447 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:46:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp3.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9675765507 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:46:02 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:46:02 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <60390.24.9.123.251.1200469140.squirrel@apotheon.net> References: <60194.24.9.123.251.1200468042.squirrel@apotheon.net> <60390.24.9.123.251.1200469140.squirrel@apotheon.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: ssmtp configuration for server authorization X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:46:03 -0000 --On Wednesday, January 16, 2008 00:39:00 -0700 perrin@apotheon.com wrote: >> >> This is my ssmtp.conf: > > (yadda yadda) > > I probably should have included a tail of my /var/log/maillog file: > > Jan 16 00:08:00 laptop sSMTP[6976]: Unable to connect to \ > "mail.domain.org" port 25. > Jan 16 00:08:00 laptop sSMTP[6976]: Cannot open mail.domain.org:25 > > As with the previous message, the server name and local hostname have been > sanitized thus: > > "laptop" is the local machine using ssmtp > "domain" is the domain of the email address and SMTP server > This might give you a clue: smtp 25/tcp mail #Simple Mail Transfer smtp 25/udp mail #Simple Mail Transfer smtps 465/tcp #smtp protocol over TLS/SSL (was ssmtp) smtps 465/udp #smtp protocol over TLS/SSL (was ssmtp) Unless you've configured your MTA in a non-standard way, smtps is on port 465 not 25. -- Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 18:58:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD5616A418 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:58:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from p26a@yahoo.com) Received: from web90405.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web90405.mail.mud.yahoo.com [216.252.100.157]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7438013C461 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:58:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from p26a@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 37234 invoked by uid 60001); 16 Jan 2008 18:58:11 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=XqgGI28Z2Hb0i50hjRuLvVSwKV1q1jK+v0iU1s34Qi3Jvz8KxQJJhwlkaXX6bOUzaZ0/Ay3ZR0BtbigQIaYE6Ek9igVH1n36h+IoFYesAcN5F2g7Nsd2cBBGh0Zgb+RR/q6UYwKCFLw8gX1yDdsnagt7/P3hQoNPJJYjYVWTw68=; X-YMail-OSG: LEWHoCcVM1kOOzcfb9KWIZ2eRXAaJtxqejDXn78YXjTHhxwzbnMzK_1CXIcmSINltr1Zbz5DSNiS56Wxg0QTEoRmKpUDQLeEy7htWFdRqeTCJp6yG2D4DqQR1b9U5A-- Received: from [64.235.97.59] by web90405.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:58:11 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/818.31 YahooMailWebService/0.7.160 Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:58:11 -0800 (PST) From: Arun Paneri To: FreeBSD User , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <771039.36759.qm@web90405.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Cc: Subject: Pls help: regarding gdb internals X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:58:12 -0000 Hi All, I am new to gdb code and trying to learn more. i need help regarding gdb internals. Can anyone write few lines about how does gdb internally works. I went to "Gdb internals guide" but couldn't find much information specifically which i am looking for. I want information like when we give command "$gdb test.exe" then how internaly it works. Does it start reading symbols and start making symbol table with this command? Does it start creating stack frames as we give command "run" or before even that? I am basically interested to know about creation of frames and how does gdb read them back when we give "backtrace" command? Thanks in advance. Regards, Arun ----- Original Message ---- From: FreeBSD User To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 12:50:19 PM Subject: When is 7.0 being released? Hello, Does anybody have an idea when 7.0 will be released? It looks like the schedule hasn't been updated, and it was scheduled for January 14th. Where can I find additional information? _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 19:09:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 957A116A419 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:09:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0695F13C447 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:09:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0GJ5xFj001934; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:05:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0GJ5lsT001929; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:05:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:05:47 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Bill Moran In-Reply-To: <20080116115440.6510872c.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Message-ID: <20080116200452.P1891@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20080116150454.GP89314@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20080116162805.GH97708@dan.emsphone.com> <20080116163701.GV89314@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20080116115440.6510872c.wmoran@potentialtech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Albert.Shih@obspm.fr, Dan Nelson , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How manu swap ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:09:28 -0000 > * Disk space is cheap. 16G of swap costs what? 15G of 15,000 RPM SCSI not mentioning IDE disks, on 4GB RAM+6 SATA disk system i allocated 2GB swap on each disk. most of the time little is used, but when it will be needed - it is From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 19:10:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70EA716A41A for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:10:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6730713C43E for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:09:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0GJ86FG001941; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:08:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0GJ82jl001938; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:08:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:08:02 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: RW In-Reply-To: <20080116181544.787f2d17@gumby.homeunix.com.> Message-ID: <20080116200616.V1891@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <478DCC6C.8010605@mbnet.fi> <478E15F3.7090809@mbnet.fi> <20080116174455.H1425@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080116181544.787f2d17@gumby.homeunix.com.> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: growfs and soft updates X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:10:12 -0000 >> problem then+i've got zero sized file in lost+found that i was unable >> to delete until i took off all strange flash with chflags. >> >> but i did it ONLY because i had no way to back it up. > > Personally I don't think it's worth the risk, unless the data is > disposable like a squid cache. What I normally do is create a new > partition and symlink things into it. it was network users shared directory for movies music etc. i already told them that i will probably remove it unless they will back it up. so i don't have to worry in case growfs would screw it up completely. anyway where to send patches? i patched it to support sector size >512 bytes (i have geli with 4k sectors). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 19:15:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0FED16A417 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:15:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF79D13C474 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:14:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0GJD9Sq001956; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:13:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0GJD78J001953; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:13:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:13:07 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: FreeBSD User In-Reply-To: <75988d070801160950h5a256927y6415f154114767be@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080116201218.B1891@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <75988d070801160950h5a256927y6415f154114767be@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: When is 7.0 being released? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:15:01 -0000 > Hello, > > Does anybody have an idea when 7.0 will be released? It looks like the > schedule hasn't been updated, and it was scheduled for January 14th. > > Where can I find additional information? when it will be ready, stable and tested. if you need to have "the latest" NOW, consider installing -current. you will help developers then, reporting any bugs that may happen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 19:19:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 129EC16A420 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:19:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 536E513C45B; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:19:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <478E58AC.6020305@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:19:08 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joseph Yeager References: <44f12db00801160837w4e8987e2jb87d7d60c2704788@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <44f12db00801160837w4e8987e2jb87d7d60c2704788@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2 Frequent Lockups X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:19:11 -0000 Joseph Yeager wrote: > Hello, > I'm experiencing daily lockups on a FreeBSD 6.2 machine thats currently > being used as a gateway for a local church school. I have installed and/or > configured the following services which are running on it right now: Quagga > (only using the Zebra daemon), DHCP (via the isc-dhcp3-server port), BIND, > and PF. Everything runs as expected except for the fact that the machine > will completely freeze (console included) quite often. Its recently gotten > as bad as freezing every 3-5 hours. I don't have any custom cron jobs > running and the only job I see that operates at that frequency is daily > maintenance. Thinking it could be a heat problem originating from sitting > on top of a switch, I put a few blocks under and now it runs a good bit > cooler. Last night, I had the windows open and it never got hotter then > luke warm and I witnessed, first hand, it completely freeze for no apparent > reason. Despite that seemingly pointing to it NOT being a heat problem, > I'll be moving it to a shelf by itself. I will also be swapping out the RAM > in a few hours when I get up there to see if that is the problem, but I > still have a feeling (after reading other similar problems like this) that > that may not be the answer. I have a similar setup running at my home which > uses the exact same motherboard but different RAM and HD. The only > difference on my home router is that I have split horizon DNS setup for my > domain and am using IPFW as opposed to PF. My home router has been rock > solid every since I got it (several months ago) and my email and webserver, > which both run FreeBSD 6.2, have never been down except for extended power > outages. I will update you on how the RAM swap goes, but if there are any > other suggestions you have I would greatly appreciate it. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug.html Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 19:30:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33A9216A41A for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:30:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schiz0phrenic21@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0626A13C448 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:30:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schiz0phrenic21@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so602657waf.3 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:30:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=1sykQy/A3RVcFZaNNuQmsDaViXiuTdnajwd0BtC6dK8=; b=HpBnUgxCv/8W4JhRvopoCRbCMK7ZAdCsbySoG9gN6e1+NheaxjGFNXU9LmJauanl8aqIGAgzX2MZ+qu4Vxmp7ZIN3JMv/UmkrP+fniggLHnKFN6KjTyhQtxKIsAuZC8weC+g6U0UeRBPiMg23E3Ae/Vd/hlW0uI6LhbUfcg/HrU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=L4mBkLkLuEKXCsPhhowhApp4PPEXoTLJQR94tEuGVHQOS7w8Q4pBesA73PgixnB7IgGxSL75WM1C6QvY95hSofz1SyOA7xbdwkLMI6A31UeK3fyZguKZexuRhfA638xzCsRBkzw5L389pKjV7lAgYsJdEKTxriLfum+p9N609G4= Received: by 10.115.78.1 with SMTP id f1mr1329995wal.100.1200511815697; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:30:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.52.14 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:30:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8d23ec860801161130k4de62ecbkefb2640ebd057c62@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:30:15 -0500 From: Schiz0 To: "Wojciech Puchar" In-Reply-To: <20080116201218.B1891@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <75988d070801160950h5a256927y6415f154114767be@mail.gmail.com> <20080116201218.B1891@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: FreeBSD User , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: When is 7.0 being released? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:30:16 -0000 On Jan 16, 2008 2:13 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Does anybody have an idea when 7.0 will be released? It looks like the > > schedule hasn't been updated, and it was scheduled for January 14th. > > > > Where can I find additional information? > > when it will be ready, stable and tested. > > if you need to have "the latest" NOW, consider installing -current. > you will help developers then, reporting any bugs that may happen > > _______________________________________________ Or you could install -stable. You don't have to use the releases. Stable is...pretty stable. I just recently upgraded to RELENG_7 from the RELENG_6 branch. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/current-stable.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 19:31:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D9A16A469 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:31:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from colin.brace@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.153]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EFA413C461 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:31:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from colin.brace@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so424643fgg.35 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:31:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; bh=2vxRY3yA5M/Vykv306xLEswUlXt7Az7ITnUKXrULwAc=; b=hvRNMSO8nEhcd7480WBUponlEfG+WOcJkaAdtUUEK+eLe+WFh5UNuFY7+6XdPAvvy7s+dQO4tESyIKRWJk4Cp4uVBxcKqPoMB4QTJfQpv0Unbk9+Cdos2xORpnmx4Nx8bGuGAyDCYUm9suxSZQd48zrTv557uzwoBYetr6CX/yw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=dA7DDsNVQfvNSSxpc+e7Le3VXOUm2q1q+t8swzBEM9avT7sAo0UNJm6O4XgyZuJRk8EE0wt7Cx/A2ufWOppdvtBATfdwcqcGcWisX889KZa+VoQqlPuQM2xeAkB9QOz7r/7nfcYxOQKA8ytjfYbfQzXS4LrrM0+orRpuYFn4n64= Received: by 10.82.150.20 with SMTP id x20mr2112982bud.5.1200511871268; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:31:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.108.2 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:31:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:31:11 +0100 From: "Colin Brace" Sender: colin.brace@gmail.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: 091637e3831138fa Subject: pkg_add: remote install (-r) broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:31:13 -0000 Hi all, At some point after my original installation of v.7-BETA3 in late November and a subsquent upgrade to BETA4 with Colin Percival's freebsd-update, installing packages remotely with pkg_add on my system broke. For example: $ sudo pkg_add -vr rtorrent scheme: [ftp] user: [] password: [] host: [ftp.freebsd.org] port: [0] document: [/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-current/Latest/rtorrent.tbz] ---> ftp.freebsd.org:21 looking up ftp.freebsd.org connecting to ftp.freebsd.org:21 <<< 220 ftp.FreeBSD.org NcFTPd Server (licensed copy) ready. >>> USER anonymous <<< 331 Guest login ok, send your complete e-mail address as password. >>> PASS colin@venus.lim.nl <<< 230-You are user #181 of 1000 simultaneous users allowed. <<< 230- <<< 230 Logged in anonymously. >>> PWD <<< 257 "/" is cwd. >>> CWD pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-current/Latest <<< 250 "/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-current/Latest" is new cwd. >>> MODE S <<< 200 Mode okay. >>> TYPE I <<< 200 Type okay. binding data socket >>> PORT 172,19,3,3,209,68 <<< 200 PORT command successful. initiating transfer >>> RETR rtorrent.tbz <<< 550 Cannot connect to 78.27.2.208:53572 - Unknown error: 0. Error: FTP Unable to get ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-current/Latest/rtorrent.tbz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) pkg_add: unable to fetch 'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-current/Latest/rtorrent.tbz' by URL pkg_add: 1 package addition(s) failed Now, I *know* the package and host are online; I can copy and paste the URL from the screen to grab it with wget: wget ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-current/Latest/rtorrent.tbz This works. What could be going wrong with add_pkg here? As I indicate above, I am currently at 7.0-BETA4 Thanks. -- Colin Brace Amsterdam http://lim.nl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 19:41:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0CB416A468 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:41:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D5A13C4CE; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:41:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <478E5DD8.5090706@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:41:12 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Colin Brace References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg_add: remote install (-r) broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:41:14 -0000 Colin Brace wrote: > Hi all, > > At some point after my original installation of v.7-BETA3 in late > November and a subsquent upgrade to BETA4 with Colin Percival's > freebsd-update, installing packages remotely with pkg_add on my system > broke. For example: > <<< 550 Cannot connect to 78.27.2.208:53572 - Unknown error: 0. I guess that is your IP. You have a firewall and are not using passive mode FTP? It should be the default unless you edited your login.conf. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 19:56:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 924DD16A417 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:56:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7865413C455 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:56:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay8.apple.com (relay8.apple.com [17.128.113.38]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C8DC1F1DC0A; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:56:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay8.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay8.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 579FD402E7; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:56:38 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 11807126-9cdecbb000005025-13-478e61763108 Received: from cswiger1.apple.com (cswiger1.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay8.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 29B5F400DA; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:56:38 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <2C402693-DD71-4B3A-A3C1-3685F8A130E0@mac.com> From: Chuck Swiger To: Arun Paneri In-Reply-To: <771039.36759.qm@web90405.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:56:36 -0800 References: <771039.36759.qm@web90405.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: FreeBSD User , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pls help: regarding gdb internals X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:56:38 -0000 On Jan 16, 2008, at 10:58 AM, Arun Paneri wrote: > Can anyone write few lines about how does gdb internally works. I > went to "Gdb internals guide" but couldn't find much information > specifically which i am looking for. I'm not familiar with the document you mentioned, but the canonical documentation for GDB is available via "info gdb". > I want information like when we give command "$gdb test.exe" then > how internaly it works. Does it start reading symbols and start > making symbol table with this command? Binary objects such as executable programs, shared libraries, etc contain symbol tables; GDB does a quick load of this symbol data to identify all of the sources of symbols for the program, and then will look up the details when needed. > Does it start creating stack frames as we give command "run" or > before even that? The program being debugged does not exist as a process until you run it, so there isn't an address space or stack until then. When the target program is run, it creates it's own stack frames according to the local architecture's machine calling conventions. > I am basically interested to know about creation of frames and how > does gdb read them back when we give "backtrace" command? Well, the calling conventions are different for every particular CPU architecture; but if you want to see the code that GDB uses, start with: /usr/src/contrib/gdb/gdb/frame-base.c /usr/src/contrib/gdb/gdb/frame-base.h /usr/src/contrib/gdb/gdb/frame-unwind.c /usr/src/contrib/gdb/gdb/frame-unwind.h /usr/src/contrib/gdb/gdb/frame.c /usr/src/contrib/gdb/gdb/frame.h ...but I suspect that something like these two articles are closer to what you are looking for: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calling_convention http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86_calling_conventions -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 20:26:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C2CE16A417 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:26:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29BD713C43E for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:26:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: (qmail 1307 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2008 20:00:12 -0000 Received: from april.chuckr.org (chuckr@[66.92.151.30]) (envelope-sender ) by mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 16 Jan 2008 20:00:12 -0000 Message-ID: <478E6185.1020305@chuckr.org> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:56:53 -0500 From: Chuck Robey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071107) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Norman Maurer References: <200801160648.m0G6mt6C001316@mail.msspal.com> <1200486145.28933.0.camel@norman-laptop> In-Reply-To: <1200486145.28933.0.camel@norman-laptop> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Moazzar Battah Subject: Re: some help please X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:26:54 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Norman Maurer wrote: > Hi, > > please reread the handbook.... I think all you need is explained there > in detail > > bye > Norman > > Am Mittwoch, den 16.01.2008, 09:46 +0200 schrieb Moazzar Battah: >> Dear Sir, >> >> I need some help , I am a new user for Linux and freebsd so I need your help >> I need to know how to install the freebsd in the best way and how I can >> install the ports like gnome and openmail interface ? also I will be >> thankful if you send me the commands and what every command mean and how I >> can use it ? >> >> I already get in the directory /usr/ports/gnome2 & /usr/ports/www and make >> install and its start downloading but nothing happened after that >> installation done ??? >> >> I also need to now how to configure the hostname and ip addresses like local >> ip and fixed ip to trait the local lan and I real lan in the same way.. >> >> Thank u very much Actually, I don't think that the names (or even a template that the names couold be derived from) of the actual cd images that you should use to install freebsd from. I know that there is more than a single choice. I know that I personally, just downloaded the biggest one, as a guess, and that worked, but I don't know what the smaller ones would have done, if they might have been better to install from (I have networking sufficent to install from the net alone, which is what I did). Somewhere, the descriptions of what the different ISO images do should show up, mostlikely in the manual. Am I wrong? Give a pointer, if you think I'm wrong. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHjmGFz62J6PPcoOkRAtlpAJ0fA65R/TiUgLX1iml3I4fal2KI5gCePk/z SYowLgDoezj0Zelm/wbQRDE= =4+BH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 20:31:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 347F616A419 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:31:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from p26a@yahoo.com) Received: from web90410.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web90410.mail.mud.yahoo.com [216.252.100.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F08C913C45A for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:31:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from p26a@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 60264 invoked by uid 60001); 16 Jan 2008 20:31:53 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=UChcrDUk3D3hcjkNAJSc77vLtYzoQgfYVkStuUFxS7zRwwf3Q5lUCdHJ/VAn6xlPWKDQzY4tIbJl9K07eZ7qYI4qCLeVCuJIfrtsOnmTutDsB/RaTH+a5nUlahfddhCKFa3mTruefHy2Ih2plnK9J3kYvJTcg4sBaRw2r1DDSN4=; X-YMail-OSG: nRNY6acVM1klIWsis7zqB.YFpiWKRydC5LpcCub2egJ1en0lXIiyEDQ.D2C6hMsyrzPU1QZ8Wd7pZPM8KuTUuONEZ96yMHDIDSwr3FjRNSOgzQ_y1NU0s9TVbKA_ZCwR7sQX5w-- Received: from [64.235.97.59] by web90410.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:31:53 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/818.31 YahooMailWebService/0.7.160 Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:31:53 -0800 (PST) From: Arun Paneri To: Chuck Swiger MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <461735.58767.qm@web90410.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Cc: FreeBSD User , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pls help: regarding gdb internals X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:31:54 -0000 Thanks a ton. I got some idea to start with. Regards, ----- Original Message ---- From: Chuck Swiger To: Arun Paneri Cc: FreeBSD User ; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 2:56:36 PM Subject: Re: Pls help: regarding gdb internals On Jan 16, 2008, at 10:58 AM, Arun Paneri wrote: > Can anyone write few lines about how does gdb internally works. I > went to "Gdb internals guide" but couldn't find much information > specifically which i am looking for. I'm not familiar with the document you mentioned, but the canonical documentation for GDB is available via "info gdb". > I want information like when we give command "$gdb test.exe" then > how internaly it works. Does it start reading symbols and start > making symbol table with this command? Binary objects such as executable programs, shared libraries, etc contain symbol tables; GDB does a quick load of this symbol data to identify all of the sources of symbols for the program, and then will look up the details when needed. > Does it start creating stack frames as we give command "run" or > before even that? The program being debugged does not exist as a process until you run it, so there isn't an address space or stack until then. When the target program is run, it creates it's own stack frames according to the local architecture's machine calling conventions. > I am basically interested to know about creation of frames and how > does gdb read them back when we give "backtrace" command? Well, the calling conventions are different for every particular CPU architecture; but if you want to see the code that GDB uses, start with: /usr/src/contrib/gdb/gdb/frame-base.c /usr/src/contrib/gdb/gdb/frame-base.h /usr/src/contrib/gdb/gdb/frame-unwind.c /usr/src/contrib/gdb/gdb/frame-unwind.h /usr/src/contrib/gdb/gdb/frame.c /usr/src/contrib/gdb/gdb/frame.h ...but I suspect that something like these two articles are closer to what you are looking for: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calling_convention http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86_calling_conventions -- -Chuck ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 20:51:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E957316A41A for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:51:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from krinklyfig@speakeasy.net) Received: from mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C319B13C459 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:51:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from krinklyfig@speakeasy.net) Received: (qmail 28483 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2008 20:24:44 -0000 Received: from 209-188-117-232.taosnet.com (HELO smogmonster.local) (krinklyfig@[209.188.117.232]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 16 Jan 2008 20:24:44 -0000 Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:24:41 -0700 From: Joshua Tinnin To: "Aryeh M. Friedman" Message-ID: <20080116202441.GA40521@smogmonster.local> References: <64c038660801040516u5c42a6cpadb475ad67fb4730@mail.gmail.com> <20080104174955.52aa33fd@gumby.homeunix.com> <64c038660801041029t1a9662bayed3ca02fd46c7ece@mail.gmail.com> <64c038660801041226k1d350bc6p727e4666ea295727@mail.gmail.com> <477FFE14.1010704@monkeybrains.net> <477FFF63.50004@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <477FFF63.50004@gmail.com> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Rudy Subject: Re: HOW-TO get Flash7 working! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: krinklyfig@speakeasy.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:51:25 -0000 On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 05:06:27PM -0500, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Rudy wrote: > > > > With all this talk about FLASH, I found something out by trial and > > error and want to post again to the list so that others searching > > can get the FLASH player working in their brower: > > > > THIS STEP IS NEEDED OR FLASH WILL NOT WORK: > > > > sysctl compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.20 > > I am using 8-current (amd64) and found all I needed to do was install > www/linux-flashplugin7 then do a nspluginwrapper -v -a -i and flash > works fine (as far I can tell)... Hot damn, that worked. I now have Flash in native Firefox. I never really paid much attention to the commands for nspluginwrapper or knew they were necessary. I have also never really gotten Flash to work but didn't try very hard at it, either. Thanks. - jt does this add any functionality I > am not aware of? (namely some sites seem to partially load like the > graphs at whos.among.us [the easiest way to test this is go to the > site in my signature then click on the 3rd icon at the bottom and then > click on graphs]) > > > > Better yet, add this to your /etc/sysctl.conf file and reboot: > > compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.20 > > > > NOTE: I just picked 2.6.20 kinda at random... seems like that is > > the linux kernel number (which I know nothing about) for the Fedora > > 7 release. Oh, and I installed Fedora 7 instead of the default > > Fedora Core 4 on my desktop. > > > > Why does the linux emulation pick 2.4.2 as the kernel version > > number to report (by default) and not 2.6.11 (their kernel version > > shipped with Fedora 4)? Seems like the ports should and linux > > module should be updated... > > > > Rudy _______________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 21:06:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 393DB16A41A for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:06:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hartmut.obst@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 86DD413C448 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:06:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hartmut.obst@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2008 20:40:06 -0000 Received: from e180064030.adsl.alicedsl.de (EHLO ic.obst.local) [85.180.64.30] by mail.gmx.net (mp035) with SMTP; 16 Jan 2008 21:40:06 +0100 X-Authenticated: #20457454 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/SUURNPSzSZS5JFtCsTeR8VpxuUbMn2XYawGl8KT bXQieXQk0GSZjn Message-ID: <478E6B9E.8040008@gmx.net> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:39:58 +0100 From: Hartmut Obst User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071231) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Robey References: <200801160648.m0G6mt6C001316@mail.msspal.com> <1200486145.28933.0.camel@norman-laptop> <478E6185.1020305@chuckr.org> In-Reply-To: <478E6185.1020305@chuckr.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Moazzar Battah , Norman Maurer Subject: Re: some help please X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:06:50 -0000 > Somewhere, the descriptions of what the different ISO images do > should show up, mostlikely in the manual. Do you mean this? > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-diff-media.html#AEN3259 -- http://www.hartmut-obst.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 20:33:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D2B16A494; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:33:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhutz@cmu.edu) Received: from jackfruit.srv.cs.cmu.edu (JACKFRUIT.SRV.CS.CMU.EDU [128.2.201.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D7F413C455; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:33:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhutz@cmu.edu) Received: from atlantis.pc.cs.cmu.edu (ATLANTIS.PC.CS.CMU.EDU [128.2.216.110]) (authenticated bits=0) by jackfruit.srv.cs.cmu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m0GImqOi012702 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:48:53 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:48:52 -0500 From: Jeffrey Hutzelman To: Robert Watson , "Jason C. Wells" Message-ID: <876FB8E38251C27B14CCCA29@atlantis.pc.cs.cmu.edu> In-Reply-To: <20080114142124.Y55696@fledge.watson.org> References: <18CC5A4A2AC36D7FF57615EE@ganymede.hub.org> <478AF6BC.8050604@highperformance.net> <20080114142124.Y55696@fledge.watson.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:09:54 +0000 Cc: rra@stanford.edu, rees@umich.edu, port-freebsd@openafs.org, freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, matt@linuxbox.com, freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.org, "Marc G. Fournier" , openafs-devel@openafs.org, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, jhutz@cmu.edu Subject: Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Re: AFS ... or equivalent ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:33:11 -0000 --On Monday, January 14, 2008 02:23:47 PM +0000 Robert Watson wrote: > I'd like very much to get at least the kernel parts of an AFS client into > the base system. That may well be realistic for arla, though I believe there was a period for a while where the kernel/arlad interface was evolving to support features like chunking. I pay only superficial attention to arla-drinkers, so I don't know what the status of any of that is; for that, you'd have to ask someone who is actively involved in arla development (I believe there are some such people on this list). It is unlikely ever to happen for OpenAFS, in which virtually all of the cache manager code is in-kernel and most of it is cross-platform. Trying to pull the OpenAFS cache manager into the FreeBSD kernel would be equivalent to forking OpenAFS; what you'd get would work and would keep up with FreeBSD, but it would be unlikely to keep up with OpenAFS. The "let's just slurp everything into the main distribution so we don't have to worry about stable interfaces" approach is really poor. It encourages bad engineering practice among people maintaining the main distribution, discourages innovation and extension by others, and generally doesn't scale. It's far better to either attempt to maintain stable external interfaces to the VFS and VM subsystems, or else admit that you don't have the resources to do so given the relatively small number of external users, in which case you almost certainly also don't have the resources to keep on top of updates to something like OpenAFS. In the long run, I'm guessing that the OpenAFS cache manager evolves more quickly than FreeBSD's VFS interface, which makes pulling the CM into the kernel tree a losing battle. If you disagree, by all means fork that part of AFS (or get someone else to do so) and see what happens (AFS's user/kernel and RPC interfaces are both fairly stable, so forking just the kernel parts should be mostly feasible). -- Jeff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 21:14:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB8316A417 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:14:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bhattr@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF7C13C46A for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:14:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bhattr@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so459243fgg.35 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:14:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=DLC1mH8HYMVMVoE+9vM+rntduHSiSS5RXZ/F7E4SAOo=; b=S3DKglqox2nuUfPhHpr1j3/d9veJNIUpjRtrhJ8g7S+5Bx4uEvjXmYayOfbC29U9cvb9JifhwcIP4/fyRCinkp8lwScxLuFvommPA/Uqu+FuFLORVKoJpxkitgHe+MFTZcOkpYlhFzVwZua2DLcVnjUkiqdYgpMZ1TYoZlU45ew= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=oRI7QJHTZ/L6c7enxsu2j3eytDR0tLLQJ9ngpjGPc5kXHzYEkxcJ39p3O0QrplkSBb7nJaK7x+Ns039H4PN5ngAZawrn5/WDT0KZtoGWHXFn8LARqtJ8WDKnnP9cK70grJjiVMbQP/VNXBZRXhM8myfCxCW54E+GcIMWFrUK26w= Received: by 10.82.174.20 with SMTP id w20mr2220775bue.21.1200516527990; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:48:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.105.3 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:48:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6efa8680801161248r4ef067a8u5d6480d996e37f9e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:48:47 -0500 From: "Radheshyam Bhatt" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: how to be *nix programmer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:14:03 -0000 Hello People, How's it going? I am interested in to developing drivers for FreeBSD. How do I go about start learning program for that? What books & resources I should look in to. I know C, and I am learning about processes, and system calls. Also where would I take my questions to if I don't get something and need help for something in system's programming... Please email me back.. thanks in advance, Good Day, Radheshyam bhattr@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 21:24:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CE2C16A417 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:24:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from p26a@yahoo.com) Received: from web90409.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web90409.mail.mud.yahoo.com [216.252.100.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1FBA513C455 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:24:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from p26a@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 63227 invoked by uid 60001); 16 Jan 2008 21:24:14 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=ceLgA4rG7uoTd432Nevp8Y7b1mEYaXX2WtktdhUzVBgXBtHDSPqetJz+DQ6rmARUktS4LGf6YYBPFkuybtBbYGsgFlG3mflaZC/+O7hOUV6OvVEHidTF/c6Hk93DeWYxPl+ZiacUry0WuUrmCBw+H98Jf/SwNjCiAx8xAm0yMQA=; X-YMail-OSG: Av_yz8cVM1m2R2FnkSAAtnLxERsRlY47JaJm9Ve_aZ2QQeBQQXmRLDdHnTzJbzoQKIXADBkuc_4HtdSbUwAXwv95ja1efrokH6vlYafRnSixLei72EvQccSX4I.j0g-- Received: from [64.235.97.59] by web90409.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:24:14 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/818.31 YahooMailWebService/0.7.160 Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:24:14 -0800 (PST) From: Arun Paneri To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <320867.62493.qm@web90409.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Cc: FreeBSD User , Aryeh Friedman Subject: Re: Pls help: regarding gdb internals X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:24:15 -0000 Thanks Aryeh & Chuck. Well, I am trying to solve issues related to GDB. Like, gdb prints wrong values of few parameteres eg "this" pointer, when we give "backtrace" or "x/10x $ebp" command in core of our company product. I think it reads wrong value from symbol table or stack frame. So i am trying to put a break point and see what exactly gdb reads for that perticuler frame when it shows a wrong data. But dont know where exactly it reads data from the symbol table or stack frame. If you have a specific idea regarding this pls give some more info. Regards. ----- Original Message ---- From: Chuck Swiger To: Arun Paneri Cc: FreeBSD User ; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 2:56:36 PM Subject: Re: Pls help: regarding gdb internals On Jan 16, 2008, at 10:58 AM, Arun Paneri wrote: > Can anyone write few lines about how does gdb internally works. I > went to "Gdb internals guide" but couldn't find much information > specifically which i am looking for. I'm not familiar with the document you mentioned, but the canonical documentation for GDB is available via "info gdb". > I want information like when we give command "$gdb test.exe" then > how internaly it works. Does it start reading symbols and start > making symbol table with this command? Binary objects such as executable programs, shared libraries, etc contain symbol tables; GDB does a quick load of this symbol data to identify all of the sources of symbols for the program, and then will look up the details when needed. > Does it start creating stack frames as we give command "run" or > before even that? The program being debugged does not exist as a process until you run it, so there isn't an address space or stack until then. When the target program is run, it creates it's own stack frames according to the local architecture's machine calling conventions. > I am basically interested to know about creation of frames and how > does gdb read them back when we give "backtrace" command? Well, the calling conventions are different for every particular CPU architecture; but if you want to see the code that GDB uses, start with: /usr/src/contrib/gdb/gdb/frame-base.c /usr/src/contrib/gdb/gdb/frame-base.h /usr/src/contrib/gdb/gdb/frame-unwind.c /usr/src/contrib/gdb/gdb/frame-unwind.h /usr/src/contrib/gdb/gdb/frame.c /usr/src/contrib/gdb/gdb/frame.h ...but I suspect that something like these two articles are closer to what you are looking for: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calling_convention http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86_calling_conventions -- -Chuck ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 20:52:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D718716A419; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:52:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [209.31.154.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70ED613C478; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:52:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1EB646C05; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:52:55 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:52:55 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Jeffrey Hutzelman In-Reply-To: <876FB8E38251C27B14CCCA29@atlantis.pc.cs.cmu.edu> Message-ID: <20080116203521.K15541@fledge.watson.org> References: <18CC5A4A2AC36D7FF57615EE@ganymede.hub.org> <478AF6BC.8050604@highperformance.net> <20080114142124.Y55696@fledge.watson.org> <876FB8E38251C27B14CCCA29@atlantis.pc.cs.cmu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:28:07 +0000 Cc: rra@stanford.edu, rees@umich.edu, port-freebsd@openafs.org, freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, matt@linuxbox.com, freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.org, "Jason C. Wells" , "Marc G. Fournier" , openafs-devel@openafs.org, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Re: AFS ... or equivalent ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:52:57 -0000 On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote: > --On Monday, January 14, 2008 02:23:47 PM +0000 Robert Watson > wrote: > >> I'd like very much to get at least the kernel parts of an AFS client into >> the base system. > > That may well be realistic for arla, though I believe there was a period for > a while where the kernel/arlad interface was evolving to support features > like chunking. I pay only superficial attention to arla-drinkers, so I > don't know what the status of any of that is; for that, you'd have to ask > someone who is actively involved in arla development (I believe there are > some such people on this list). > > It is unlikely ever to happen for OpenAFS, in which virtually all of the > cache manager code is in-kernel and most of it is cross-platform. Trying to > pull the OpenAFS cache manager into the FreeBSD kernel would be equivalent > to forking OpenAFS; what you'd get would work and would keep up with > FreeBSD, but it would be unlikely to keep up with OpenAFS. I chatted with Darrick for a while on IM yesterday (or was it the day before) to try and get a better understanding of the OpenAFS parts, and now that I know a little more, agree. My primary experience until now has been with Arla, which has a very stable interface between its relatively static kernel module and the userspace cache manager, so the main on-going engineering for the kernel module is tracking changes in the FreeBSD VFS rather than tracking Arla changes. > The "let's just slurp everything into the main distribution so we don't have > to worry about stable interfaces" approach is really poor. It encourages > bad engineering practice among people maintaining the main distribution, > discourages innovation and extension by others, and generally doesn't scale. > It's far better to either attempt to maintain stable external interfaces to > the VFS and VM subsystems, or else admit that you don't have the resources > to do so given the relatively small number of external users, in which case > you almost certainly also don't have the resources to keep on top of updates > to something like OpenAFS. Right now we maintain a relatively stable VM/VFS KPI withing a major release (i.e, FreeBSD 6.0 -> 6.1 -> 6.2 -> 6.3), but see fairly significant changes between major releases (5.x -> 6.x -> 7.x, etc). I expect to see further changes in VFS for 8.x (and some of the locking-related ones have already started going in). The historic problem for Arla has been that instead of tracking these VFS changes as they are made, they had to catch up every once in a while. Normally that "every once in a while" has been at the point where a FreeBSD branch is coming to the end of support rather than when it is new and shiny. The result has been that Arla is pretty hard to use with FreeBSD as you either have to run a relatively old version of FreeBSD, or update the Arla kernel parts yourself (neither exciting prospects). In particular, if you are a FreeBSD kernel developer, you will never be running Arla as you are almost certainly running something on the development HEAD and not an aging branch. This leads to a bit of a chicken-and-egg problem, in which FreeBSD developers never use AFS, and this almost certainly an obstacle to it getting much use in the wider FreeBSD community. If there's sufficient interest in the AFS community to create and maintain a port of OpenAFS to FreeBSD, I think that would be wonderful. However, in light of the fact that it hasn't really happened to date, I've been trying to think of ways to help support that community a bit better. In the case of Arla, there's a quite logical path: if we import the nnpfs kernel module (but not cache manager), then it will track FreeBSD development and almost certainly work with little or no trouble on new major releases, as sweeps to various KPIs will happen "for free". If that doesn't work with OpenAFS due to structural differences from Arla, that's a shame (because it is easy in the case of Arla), but life. So let's turn the question around: to get the OpenAFS client up and running on FreeBSD, do you have any technical requirements not yet met by FreeBSD, or is it really about finding someone willing to spend some time doing the bulk of the technical work and track bugs for a while? Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 21:45:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD51C16A41A for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:45:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC1413C45B for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:45:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m0GLgmaw089200; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:42:48 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m0GLgmbY089199; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:42:48 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:42:48 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Radheshyam Bhatt Message-ID: <20080116214248.GB89024@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <6efa8680801161248r4ef067a8u5d6480d996e37f9e@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6efa8680801161248r4ef067a8u5d6480d996e37f9e@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to be *nix programmer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:45:06 -0000 On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 03:48:47PM -0500, Radheshyam Bhatt wrote: > Hello People, > > > How's it going? I am interested in to developing drivers > for FreeBSD. How do I go about start learning program for that? What > books & resources I should look in to. I know C, and I am learning about > processes, and system calls. Also where would I take my questions to if I > don't get something and need help for something in system's programming... > Please email me back.. Learning C and probably C++ and maybe some Assembly is good. After that, you might want to absorb the McKusic books: 'Design and Implementaiton of the (4.3 and) 4.4 BSD Operating System. There is also some online documentation on writing drivers. I don't have the address at hand, but a little searching on the FreeBSD web site should turn it up. ////jerry > > > thanks in advance, > > Good Day, > Radheshyam > bhattr@gmail.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 21:46:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25FAF16A41B for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:46:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from hs-out-2122.google.com (hs-out-0708.google.com [64.233.178.247]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C291C13C4CC for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:46:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: by hs-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id h53so261080hsh.11 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:46:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=9KCR7aY6L97abWsxjPWguYkUAhEknwjkAwosYPNhVZ8=; b=jcEHd7Rh2z9lxKFxCH9GHQmXd21qY0HmRoyUsNyFxWve+5eIuu5ptFX9fuF5BJwMabbnxIqLsq9/ffGa3of9XM7VcpQg2SrBqDdggr9dK+OfP1JZqvqHfdkyGMiy5f871oqD4riFY9mvzKbzFSeN88qTLjgJuV8kjpGgftFISo4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=l5WMXS9UjvBA3yYrRhrIuQD8mNxXNAevVUAgtcd8CknhfRDr+JujZkpA5bVJsYNCznoyTb8XFOFDI2rss1b0rEdGu69QZe92DKLiYjdGBaQq/6yUxtkXkRHFsOV2xfrO57tGseNS9wA6aVpkLFNNV6hSyCAJwIb01096CgdwHMA= Received: by 10.142.126.17 with SMTP id y17mr812431wfc.170.1200519977579; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:46:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.72.20 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:46:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:46:17 -0800 From: "Kurt Buff" To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: Subject: Re: Anyone out there using SSL-Explorer? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:46:21 -0000 On Jan 15, 2008 7:00 PM, Kurt Buff wrote: > I've been trying to install it on a box I've thrown together (FreeBSD > it-kbuff-fbsd1.mycompany.com 6.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.3-PRERELEASE #0) > and have followed the directions as best I could in the following > documents: > > /usr/src/sslexplorer/README (from the src install package at > http://internap.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/sslexplorer/sslexplorer-1.0.0_RC13-src.zip) > > http://n3ncy.com/UNIX/FreeBSD/SSLExplorer.htm (which seems not to be > for the source install, and with which I had no luck) > > and > > http://3sp.com/kb/idx/21/088/article/How_do_I_install_the_source_code.html > (the PDF they link to is so obscured by a huge DRAFT stamp that it's > pretty much unusable.) > > I've installed Java and apache-ant, and execute '# ant install', which > churns and produces lots of output - It's supposed to launch an > install wizard, which I never see, then it finally states > > install: > [java] Java Result: 1 > > BUILD SUCCESSFUL > Total time: 1 minute 10 seconds > > then I execute '# ant run', which produces lots of similar output, but > then it exits with > > console: > [echo] > [echo] > Service wrapper not currently supported on this platform (FreeBSD), so > falling back to > [echo] > generic method. You will not have restart ability from the user > interface and > [echo] > beware of using CTRL+C, it may leave processes running > [echo] > > console-using-java: > [java] Java Result: 1 > > BUILD SUCCESSFUL > Total time: 54 seconds > > and nothing is running that I would expect to see. > > If anyone on this list has experience with it, I'd appreciate a bit of advice. > > Thanks, > > Kurt Per a private message (thanks, Peter) I learned that 'ant run' is deprecated, and I should instead use 'ant start'. This seems to have no effect, as the output is the same. The README does talk about a wizard, which, after pondering all of this overnight, seems to mean some GUI component that guides you through setup. There is no window manager on this machine, and I don't have X installed, except for what Java/Ant libraries were installed. So, I'm still left with the questions above. Any takers? Kurt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 22:00:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430AA16A417 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:00:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@boosten.org) Received: from smtpq2.groni1.gr.home.nl (smtpq2.groni1.gr.home.nl [213.51.130.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F4B13C448 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:00:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@boosten.org) Received: from [213.51.130.189] (port=37341 helo=smtp2.groni1.gr.home.nl) by smtpq2.groni1.gr.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JFGIs-0004MB-SA; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:00:10 +0100 Received: from cp268254-a.landg1.lb.home.nl ([84.25.65.88]:4852 helo=ra.egypt.nl) by smtp2.groni1.gr.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JFGIr-00087N-FK; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:00:10 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (xp.egypt.nl [192.168.13.35]) by ra.egypt.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A62173989A; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:00:08 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <478E7E67.5090307@boosten.org> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:00:07 +0100 From: Peter Boosten User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kurt Buff References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080116-0, 01/16/2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone out there using SSL-Explorer? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:00:13 -0000 Kurt Buff wrote: > > > Per a private message (thanks, Peter) I learned that 'ant run' is > deprecated, and I should instead use 'ant start'. > > This seems to have no effect, as the output is the same. > > The README does talk about a wizard, which, after pondering all of > this overnight, seems to mean some GUI component that guides you > through setup. There is no window manager on this machine, and I don't > have X installed, except for what Java/Ant libraries were installed. > > So, I'm still left with the questions above. > Kurt, We spoke briefly about 'ant install' opening port 28080... when this happens, you can connect your browser to that port (http://yourhost:28080 -> this is the wizard the readme is talking about). There seems to be some timegap between the installer reporting it's ready and the actual opening of the port (I tried last night). You don't need X (I don't have it), just some patience. When you've completed the install (with your browser), the ant will shutdown and you can start then sslexplorer with 'ant start'. Again there will be a timegap between the ending of the startup script and the opening of the port. Peter -- http://www.boosten.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 22:03:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 157D716A417 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:03:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C522613C447 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:03:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so601630pyb.10 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:03:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=a4nDQSlA0Go+7cW3PFWuvoU9kK7zC9E739rmGHqmvD8=; b=A8BU3qzMNlSMXleiwHd0svFWwxm6JaAIhPpPn+tXnkMi1eshYjS6QDkledJFKkKtmOLUyG/CVX9gPc9zU5KqoRtGCqvFI30HcRWAMEnUQ7JOU6nASDCL9+qGmfZ13lCwIRMVDv5RYYzBB8Z3OCSQKNOF0kNQcxBmI6FMpgN9NPs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UnamOFEF87F2pwsSS7BuiLxWNKgn2lJXBkKxvcuX3dML9ZQ3F8a3oDLmfJNgLqIU9VFlCUUm1SyUKmwxLYzaFGS1WEHWuXClbNLmNJBPX89kuJ5SJGdwCfgSQGjgcTXpIL8SwdF5eQFyj1zBz6tsP3fkUdnODgESbekHqkfcsNk= Received: by 10.65.224.11 with SMTP id b11mr2764431qbr.93.1200520995547; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:03:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.112.7 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:03:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:03:15 -0500 From: "Aryeh Friedman" To: "Arun Paneri" In-Reply-To: <320867.62493.qm@web90409.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <320867.62493.qm@web90409.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Cc: FreeBSD User , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pls help: regarding gdb internals X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:03:23 -0000 On Jan 16, 2008 4:24 PM, Arun Paneri wrote: > Thanks Aryeh & Chuck. > Well, I am trying to solve issues related to GDB. Like, gdb prints wrong values of few parameteres eg "this" pointer, when we give "backtrace" or "x/10x $ebp" command in core of our company product. It should be the first param (i.e. starts on byte 12 of the frame)... $ebp points the next stack frame (i.e. where the next push will happen) so to really understand you need to look 12 bytes "below" edp... For example I used the following loop to find what func a call came from (since I don't have the orginal code any more this is psedo): do ptr=(*edb) +4 // gives you the return addr for the current frame while ptr!=desired frame addr the edb+12 has be done with inline asm when the loop is done ptr-4 is the start of the frame your intrested in thus ptr-4+12 is the this param. A small caution here doing this kind of in stack ptr math can lead to some very bizzare bugs... for example the above loop combined with a param ptr deref (i.e. treat the param of intrest as a ptr) lead to the strangest bug I have seen in my 20 year career... essencially lets say I had a loop to go through params to see which one of interest (I was using this as a way of automating some aspects of a OO RDBMS), which in my case was the first param of a ptr type whose value was -1 [the db would then do some db magic and replace it with a ptr to a real instance read from disk]... now that being said lets say "a" is the offset of the current param and "b" is the offset of current param we are testing such that: while(b > I think it reads wrong value from symbol table or stack frame. So i am trying to put a break point and see what exactly gdb reads for that perticuler frame when it shows a wrong data. But dont know where exactly it reads data from the symbol table or stack frame. > > If you have a specific idea regarding this pls give some more info. > > > Regards. > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Chuck Swiger > To: Arun Paneri > Cc: FreeBSD User ; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 2:56:36 PM > Subject: Re: Pls help: regarding gdb internals > > On Jan 16, 2008, at 10:58 AM, Arun Paneri wrote: > > Can anyone write few lines about how does gdb internally works. I > > went to "Gdb internals guide" but couldn't find much information > > specifically which i am looking for. > > I'm not familiar with the document you mentioned, but the canonical > documentation for GDB is available via "info gdb". > > > I want information like when we give command "$gdb test.exe" then > > how internaly it works. Does it start reading symbols and start > > making symbol table with this command? > > Binary objects such as executable programs, shared libraries, etc > contain symbol tables; GDB does a quick load of this symbol data to > identify all of the sources of symbols for the program, and then will > look up the details when needed. > > > Does it start creating stack frames as we give command "run" or > > before even that? > > The program being debugged does not exist as a process until you run > it, so there isn't an address space or stack until then. When the > target program is run, it creates it's own stack frames according to > the local architecture's machine calling conventions. > > > I am basically interested to know about creation of frames and how > > does gdb read them back when we give "backtrace" command? > > Well, the calling conventions are different for every particular CPU > architecture; but if you want to see the code that GDB uses, start with: > > /usr/src/contrib/gdb/gdb/frame-base.c > /usr/src/contrib/gdb/gdb/frame-base.h > /usr/src/contrib/gdb/gdb/frame-unwind.c > /usr/src/contrib/gdb/gdb/frame-unwind.h > /usr/src/contrib/gdb/gdb/frame.c > /usr/src/contrib/gdb/gdb/frame.h > > ...but I suspect that something like these two articles are closer to > what you are looking for: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calling_convention > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86_calling_conventions > > -- > -Chuck > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > > Looking for last minute shopping deals? > Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 22:22:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 814D816A41A for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:22:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wahjava@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3412313C442 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:22:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wahjava@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l15so377900rvb.43 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:22:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-face:x-attribution:x-os:x-os-version:x-os-architecture:x-uptime:face:organization:pgp:x-pgp:x-pgp-fp:user-agent:sender; bh=idOre3zCVJTlhh6xd66KEEJd7HNz5f8+nFcVrvNL/rU=; b=L+V2x9fl65f6pmV/fGtzG0I3lWoPNhNDLsdqfG5/g2RHbG5+pZ2fb56XX5Rp1UHqWci4CqCK8d53QvUt2C4hsFojIR/4ZbwKNIzfTdCLbcwoQo1dJkAdsS/xBmvkWuilma+RiVluK6ydCl00jE6j5VICzHTji53JFTbPE9V1/uY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-face:x-attribution:x-os:x-os-version:x-os-architecture:x-uptime:face:organization:pgp:x-pgp:x-pgp-fp:user-agent:sender; b=ghBCKlIk9pex18/a3eNPjHJAYv7s8qH2sQHE/J5JcPBlq6RSND+tChGnFsBHxDCbQS0W0AOTIak1t70NC0bEfItGLhMbI9p22d4AK1fHXYPJg+12wBXK/kQ0swxiHjIJYfD3OsL2AGM42tOkKdBhL2SBm3QBRcnglWXqm7E9KJM= Received: by 10.141.22.1 with SMTP id z1mr915060rvi.282.1200522153334; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:22:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from chateau.d.lf ( [122.162.237.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l32sm3575694rvb.2.2008.01.16.14.22.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:22:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 03:52:33 +0530 From: =?utf-8?B?4KSG4KS24KWA4KS3IOCktuClgeCkleCljeCksg==?= Ashish Shukla To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080116222233.GA7938@chateau.d.lf> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <320867.62493.qm@web90409.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <320867.62493.qm@web90409.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Face: "\:nMpJ)EA!j>2nEu-[(+&o:N+CtL^AS\, Jv*LO5qBr#W2.\=d Subject: Re: Pls help: regarding gdb internals X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:22:35 -0000 --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ,--[ On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 01:24:14PM -0800, Arun Paneri wrote: | Thanks Aryeh & Chuck.=20 | Well, I am trying to solve issues related to GDB. Like, gdb prints wrong = values of few parameteres eg "this" pointer, when we give "backtrace" or "x= /10x $ebp" command in core of our company product.=20 The passing of 'this' pointer depends on the C++ calling convention in use. | =20 | I think it reads wrong value from symbol table or stack frame. So i am tr= ying to put a break point and see what exactly gdb reads for that perticule= r frame when it shows a wrong data. But dont know where exactly it reads da= ta from the symbol table or stack frame. AFAIK, symbol table simply stores symbols and their addresses, not data. Data you'll find in Data Section (readonly/static allocation), Stack (runti= me-static allocation), or Heap (runtime-dynamic allocation). HTH --=20 Ashish Shukla =E0=A4=86=E0=A4=B6=E0=A5=80=E0=A4=B7 =E0=A4=B6=E0=A5=81=E0=A4= =95=E0=A5=8D=E0=A4=B2 http://wahjava.wordpress.com/ =C2=B7-- =C2=B7- =C2=B7=C2=B7=C2=B7=C2=B7 =C2=B7--- =C2=B7- =C2=B7=C2=B7=C2= =B7- =C2=B7- =C2=B7--=C2=B7-=C2=B7 --=C2=B7 -- =C2=B7- =C2=B7=C2=B7 =C2=B7-= =C2=B7=C2=B7 =C2=B7-=C2=B7-=C2=B7- -=C2=B7-=C2=B7 --- -- --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHjoOpHy+EEHYuXnQRAtUcAKCnGIN9xX7A7pDQDhBxcxhOLm0jXwCgoJ7h PyPbYl6KXGP3eiw7Q0jut58= =5XxL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 22:30:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2426316A417 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:30:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE0313C448 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:30:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0GMTt4G097522; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:29:56 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20080116162638.02528c68@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:29:41 -0600 To: "Joseph Yeager" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <44f12db00801160837w4e8987e2jb87d7d60c2704788@mail.gmail.co m> References: <44f12db00801160837w4e8987e2jb87d7d60c2704788@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2 Frequent Lockups X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:30:08 -0000 At 10:37 AM 1/16/2008, Joseph Yeager wrote: >Hello, > I'm experiencing daily lockups on a FreeBSD 6.2 machine thats currently >being used as a gateway for a local church school. I have installed and/or >configured the following services which are running on it right now: Quagga >(only using the Zebra daemon), DHCP (via the isc-dhcp3-server port), BIND, >and PF. Everything runs as expected except for the fact that the machine >will completely freeze (console included) quite often. Its recently gotten >as bad as freezing every 3-5 hours. I don't have any custom cron jobs >running and the only job I see that operates at that frequency is daily >maintenance. Thinking it could be a heat problem originating from sitting >on top of a switch, I put a few blocks under and now it runs a good bit >cooler. Last night, I had the windows open and it never got hotter then >luke warm and I witnessed, first hand, it completely freeze for no apparent >reason. Despite that seemingly pointing to it NOT being a heat problem, >I'll be moving it to a shelf by itself. I will also be swapping out the RAM >in a few hours when I get up there to see if that is the problem, but I >still have a feeling (after reading other similar problems like this) that >that may not be the answer. I have a similar setup running at my home which >uses the exact same motherboard but different RAM and HD. The only >difference on my home router is that I have split horizon DNS setup for my >domain and am using IPFW as opposed to PF. My home router has been rock >solid every since I got it (several months ago) and my email and webserver, >which both run FreeBSD 6.2, have never been down except for extended power >outages. I will update you on how the RAM swap goes, but if there are any >other suggestions you have I would greatly appreciate it. > >Thanks, >Joe Lockups are usually hardware related. You should run diagnostics on all your motherboard, RAM, drives, and NIC's. Check that your system BIOS settings are correct, and you are not "over-clocking" your CPU or RAM. I would run the generic kernel if you have a custom kernel. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 00:25:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CDC916A46D for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:25:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from modulok@gmail.com) Received: from hs-out-2122.google.com (hs-out-0708.google.com [64.233.178.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4828313C4CC for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:25:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from modulok@gmail.com) Received: by hs-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id h53so306665hsh.11 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:25:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=ZctXRXJ7CUlXRGUW6ybW8LXbBNA9fByyl4Rj3mcN9JA=; b=I5WaxR5fo7oYWC4uCOadTSQY+5G3uzBzLx2M8Mg7dPLVrSpgvNUwoLqdiqpp5TvJLpbWJU4GZ9d6QMnKNmEvqHryqZzQmQB6+p4Dc2dAfrAPKqpryadsIl6FlwCoHBUJz2Kia9RYqn3FIoUfybVj+BgFWAB70KOrqAxh76+UZ8A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FBy2ZAnbY8bUCOamUgpMnRREPWr7Eqw3eJlXdKUKm25aFM4NPfbqXSxRAdRZle25nmKfSCKoTtSOdwOW/j8nZ7Y7jR4bNCtnTx08WKGLdLMKqmAs3+X8O0M1kC48Mlru16rmVzXbdRSONqeKbG3hsujaG4QXTEcmuOWFBH7SMx0= Received: by 10.142.155.4 with SMTP id c4mr894265wfe.208.1200529525493; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:25:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.50.8 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:25:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <64c038660801161625j1330035fn8c084498e01998a4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:25:25 -0700 From: Modulok To: joeyea323@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20080116162638.02528c68@mail.computinginnovations.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <44f12db00801160837w4e8987e2jb87d7d60c2704788@mail.gmail.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20080116162638.02528c68@mail.computinginnovations.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2 Frequent Lockups X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:25:27 -0000 >>Lockups are usually hardware related. You should run diagnostics on all >>your motherboard, RAM, drives, and NIC's. Check that your system BIOS >>settings are correct, and you are not "over-clocking" your CPU or RAM. >> >>I would run the generic kernel if you have a custom kernel. Don't overlook the power. If it's not on an uninterruptible power supply, you might consider this. Even if it is, if the power supply unit itself is faulty, very weird things can happen. In any case, if you do track down the exact cause, report back to the list. -Modulok- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 00:32:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 167DE16A46B for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:32:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from outbound-mail-103.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-103.bluehost.com [69.89.22.13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E62D813C442 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:32:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 7623 invoked by uid 0); 17 Jan 2008 00:32:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box183.bluehost.com) (69.89.25.183) by xmail.bluehost.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2008 00:32:54 -0000 Received: from c-24-9-123-251.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.9.123.251] helo=demeter.hydra) by box183.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JFIgg-0006g9-Am for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:32:54 -0700 Received: by demeter.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:32:53 -0700 Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:32:53 -0700 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080117003253.GB55628@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <60194.24.9.123.251.1200468042.squirrel@apotheon.net> <60390.24.9.123.251.1200469140.squirrel@apotheon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {737:box183.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.com} {sentby:smtp auth 24.9.123.251 authed with perrin@apotheon.com} Subject: Re: ssmtp configuration for server authorization [solved] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:32:55 -0000 On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:46:02PM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote: > > This might give you a clue: > > smtp 25/tcp mail #Simple Mail Transfer > smtp 25/udp mail #Simple Mail Transfer > smtps 465/tcp #smtp protocol over TLS/SSL (was ssmtp) > smtps 465/udp #smtp protocol over TLS/SSL (was ssmtp) > > Unless you've configured your MTA in a non-standard way, smtps is on port > 465 not 25. I was testing the configuration without TLS or SSL because I wanted to eliminate encryption issues as variables while trying to nail down the problem. However . . . I have discovered that the problem has nothing to do with my config file's syntax and everything to do with the fact that the guys running the remote SMTP server changed the authentication procedure and started using a nonstandard port. After getting the new information I needed, and changing my configuration to suit, everything works like a charm. Sorry about the unnecessary list noise. -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] MacUser, Nov. 1990: "There comes a time in the history of any project when it becomes necessary to shoot the engineers and begin production." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 00:35:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DED216A418 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:35:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D027613C4E1 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:35:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id l8so346376nzf.13 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:35:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=Pd7wUHu9q8BdH+Km11fT6JkQWZShvrMrkI5qjlN9zys=; b=LUW9kLnwYyQW1so9Q2W3tmo0vtKrhGo1qfvl68+9jkiRTuKbiVEH8cBijYzbZNbgo6sHECmnAn0OBAfAugnq91el0lrUMZhAooDL5t305ncGTMK6dmZHYE5VHnalWNGpVYjcb8xrMyeiJWiUCW0C8ucaBfSe05HgxCn90VqUZYo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ppAsFTJFzum+Hhhgdqmfh7VWCCLpVkZrqaBBDwVIFZ0J8ZE3C66VcQRJBmfMblBaN4q4tYUG8NLZU1QF+23uv5Zk2gU6Vu4m5RF3wpJXbkAmQQAHLps7bRlpJOnAd0byh9J3M7Z/2chL7kXrYrNcwL/PCRCqtoDw34/qCwZzZ6M= Received: by 10.142.225.11 with SMTP id x11mr905069wfg.175.1200530157584; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:35:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.72.20 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:35:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:35:57 -0800 From: "Kurt Buff" To: "Peter Boosten" In-Reply-To: <478E7E67.5090307@boosten.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <478E7E67.5090307@boosten.org> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone out there using SSL-Explorer? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:35:59 -0000 On Jan 16, 2008 2:00 PM, Peter Boosten wrote: > Kurt Buff wrote: > > > > > > Per a private message (thanks, Peter) I learned that 'ant run' is > > deprecated, and I should instead use 'ant start'. > > > > This seems to have no effect, as the output is the same. > > > > The README does talk about a wizard, which, after pondering all of > > this overnight, seems to mean some GUI component that guides you > > through setup. There is no window manager on this machine, and I don't > > have X installed, except for what Java/Ant libraries were installed. > > > > So, I'm still left with the questions above. > > > > Kurt, > > We spoke briefly about 'ant install' opening port 28080... when this > happens, you can connect your browser to that port > (http://yourhost:28080 -> this is the wizard the readme is talking > about). There seems to be some timegap between the installer reporting > it's ready and the actual opening of the port (I tried last night). > > You don't need X (I don't have it), just some patience. When you've > completed the install (with your browser), the ant will shutdown and you > can start then sslexplorer with 'ant start'. Again there will be a > timegap between the ending of the startup script and the opening of the > port. > > > Peter OK - I'll buy that the wizard is the GUI used through a web browser - that makes sense. However, I executed 'ant start' within the directory at the console as root, while tracking processes in a putty ssh terminal with top during that execution. I noticed that java was running, but then the ant process stopped on the console, and in top the java entry disappeared. Testing after that, with netstat -a, revealed no port open other than the usual smtp/ssh/ntp ports that I use on any machine. Trying to connect with Firefox is unsuccessful at that point. As you might surmise, I'm not familiar with ant or java, so am just bashing about looking for clues. Lastly for the moment, I noticed that I didn't have the JRE installed, so I took the time to download that file and 'make install clean', then execute 'ant install' and 'ant run', with the same results. I have output from both 'ant install' and 'ant run' should anyone care to take a look. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 23:48:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D36B16A417; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:48:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhutz@cmu.edu) Received: from minbar.fac.cs.cmu.edu (MINBAR.FAC.CS.CMU.EDU [128.2.185.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C833E13C467; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:48:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhutz@cmu.edu) Received: from minbar.fac.cs.cmu.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by minbar.fac.cs.cmu.edu id aa12622; 16 Jan 2008 16:47 EST Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:47:14 -0500 (EST) From: Jeffrey Hutzelman X-X-Sender: To: Robert Watson In-Reply-To: <20080116203521.K15541@fledge.watson.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:37:51 +0000 Cc: rra@stanford.edu, rees@umich.edu, port-freebsd@openafs.org, freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, matt@linuxbox.com, freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.org, "Jason C. Wells" , "Marc G. Fournier" , openafs-devel@openafs.org, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Re: AFS ... or equivalent ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:48:54 -0000 On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Robert Watson wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote: > > > The "let's just slurp everything into the main distribution so we don't have > > to worry about stable interfaces" approach is really poor. It encourages > > bad engineering practice among people maintaining the main distribution, > > discourages innovation and extension by others, and generally doesn't scale. > > It's far better to either attempt to maintain stable external interfaces to > > the VFS and VM subsystems, or else admit that you don't have the resources > > to do so given the relatively small number of external users, in which case > > you almost certainly also don't have the resources to keep on top of updates > > to something like OpenAFS. > > Right now we maintain a relatively stable VM/VFS KPI withing a major release > (i.e, FreeBSD 6.0 -> 6.1 -> 6.2 -> 6.3), but see fairly significant changes > between major releases (5.x -> 6.x -> 7.x, etc). I expect to see further > changes in VFS for 8.x (and some of the locking-related ones have already > started going in). Yup; that's a reasonable process. > The historic problem for Arla has been that instead of tracking these VFS > changes as they are made, they had to catch up every once in a while. Normally > that "every once in a while" has been at the point where a FreeBSD branch is > coming to the end of support rather than when it is new and shiny. Yes, that's a problem you're likely to run into unless you have a community of developers who are interested in keeping current versions working for their own use. For example, we tend to have relatively little trouble getting people to spend time making OpenAFS work on Linux or Solaris (sometimes we have trouble _getting_ it to work, but that's a different story). > In the case of > Arla, there's a quite logical path: if we import the nnpfs kernel module (but > not cache manager), then it will track FreeBSD development and almost > certainly work with little or no trouble on new major releases, as sweeps to > various KPIs will happen "for free". Yes. In fact, I think NetBSD has already done that. > So let's turn the question around: to get the OpenAFS client up and running on > FreeBSD, do you have any technical requirements not yet met by FreeBSD I don't think we know the answer to that... > , or is > it really about finding someone willing to spend some time doing the bulk of > the technical work and track bugs for a while? because this _is_ a significant part of the problem. So for starters, I think we're looking for someone who has some familiarity with OpenAFS and/or with FreeBSD's VFS layer, or thinks they can fake it, and who has cycles they're interested in spending on this. I'm sure such a person would be welcome on the openafs-devel list. -- Jeff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 01:03:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C549816A420 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 01:03:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from njt@ayvali.org) Received: from starfish.geekisp.com (mail.geekisp.com [216.168.135.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A1F13C467 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 01:03:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from njt@ayvali.org) Received: (qmail 3266 invoked by uid 1003); 17 Jan 2008 01:04:30 -0000 Received: from clam.int.geekisp.com (HELO clam.geekisp.com) (192.168.4.38) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 17 Jan 2008 01:04:30 -0000 Received: from clam.geekisp.com (njt@localhost.geekisp.com [127.0.0.1]) by clam.geekisp.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m0H13TXi020703 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:03:29 -0500 (EST) Received: (from njt@localhost) by clam.geekisp.com (8.14.0/8.14.0/Submit) id m0H13TsS003118 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:03:29 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: clam.geekisp.com: njt set sender to njt@ayvali.org using -f Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:03:29 -0500 From: "N.J. Thomas" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080117010329.GD6007@ayvali.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Subject: lockfile -- posix compliant? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 01:03:30 -0000 Can someone tell me if lockfile(1) is a POSIX-defined utility? I couldn't tell from the man page or the source code, and I seem to be having trouble locating info on the web. Jens Schweikhardt's excellent page on FreeBSD POSIX Compliance: http://people.freebsd.org/~schweikh/posix-utilities-APR-02.html doesn't list it, so I am inclined to say that it is not, but I wanted to be sure. thanks, Thomas -- N.J. Thomas njt@ayvali.org Etiamsi occiderit me, in ipso sperabo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 01:25:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7656116A417 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 01:25:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3430A13C442 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 01:25:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from c83-253-25-183.bredband.comhem.se ([83.253.25.183]:63289 helo=falcon.midgard.homeip.net) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JFJVK-0007Jo-6N for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 02:25:19 +0100 Received: (qmail 97489 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2008 02:25:11 +0100 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with ESMTP; 17 Jan 2008 02:25:11 +0100 Received: (qmail 74912 invoked by uid 1001); 17 Jan 2008 02:25:11 +0100 Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 02:25:11 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson To: "N.J. Thomas" Message-ID: <20080117012511.GA74669@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: "N.J. Thomas" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20080117010329.GD6007@ayvali.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080117010329.GD6007@ayvali.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Originating-IP: 83.253.25.183 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1JFJVK-0007Jo-6N. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1JFJVK-0007Jo-6N 48438cfc2bfa3f821eb9df9d61294302 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lockfile -- posix compliant? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 01:25:20 -0000 On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 08:03:29PM -0500, N.J. Thomas wrote: > Can someone tell me if lockfile(1) is a POSIX-defined utility? I > couldn't tell from the man page or the source code, and I seem to be > having trouble locating info on the web. > > Jens Schweikhardt's excellent page on FreeBSD POSIX Compliance: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~schweikh/posix-utilities-APR-02.html > > doesn't list it, so I am inclined to say that it is not, but I wanted to > be sure. > Considering that lockfile(1) is usually installed as part of procmail, and is not part of the base system of FreeBSD, NetBSD, Solaris or Linux, it seems fairly safe say that lockfile(1) is not defined by POSIX. It might be that you meant lockf(1) though, which is part of the FreeBSD base system. It is not part of either NetBSD, Linux or Solaris though and the FreeBSD manpage makes no mention of standard compliance, which means it is most likely not defined by POSIX either. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 01:50:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E65E616A417 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 01:50:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+SH=d40c5a0b@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from turtle-out.mxes.net (turtle-out.mxes.net [216.86.168.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA5F13C458 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 01:50:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+SH=d40c5a0b@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by turtle-in.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 253A21641E9 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:25:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A30B3D05A7 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:25:40 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 01:25:38 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080117012538.68249b0c@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <8d23ec860801161130k4de62ecbkefb2640ebd057c62@mail.gmail.com> References: <75988d070801160950h5a256927y6415f154114767be@mail.gmail.com> <20080116201218.B1891@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <8d23ec860801161130k4de62ecbkefb2640ebd057c62@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.5; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: When is 7.0 being released? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 01:50:21 -0000 On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:30:15 -0500 Schiz0 wrote: > On Jan 16, 2008 2:13 PM, Wojciech Puchar > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > Does anybody have an idea when 7.0 will be released? It looks > > > like the schedule hasn't been updated, and it was scheduled for > > > January 14th. > > > > > > Where can I find additional information? > > > > when it will be ready, stable and tested. > > > > if you need to have "the latest" NOW, consider installing -current. > > you will help developers then, reporting any bugs that may happen > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Or you could install -stable. You don't have to use the releases. > Stable is...pretty stable. I just recently upgraded to RELENG_7 from > the RELENG_6 branch. Actually the RELENG_7_0 branch already exists. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 01:54:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3142816A468 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 01:54:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougs@dawnsign.com) Received: from mailfilter.dawnsign.com (cetus.dawnsign.com [216.70.250.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C9FB13C455 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 01:54:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougs@dawnsign.com) Received: from cetus.dawnsign.com (cetus.dawnsign.com [192.168.1.5]) by mailfilter.dawnsign.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2985395818 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:32:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by cetus.dawnsign.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:32:24 -0800 Message-ID: <9DE6EC5B5CF8C84281AE3D7454376A0D6D020C@cetus.dawnsign.com> From: Doug Sampson To: "'questions@freebsd.org'" Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:32:24 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Cc: Subject: 3Ware 9650SE with 4 disk array X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 01:54:50 -0000 Hi, We've received a server containing 3Ware 9650SE controller with 4 ports and it comes with 4 WD7500AYYS drives with the following drive parameters of LBA 1465149168 (sectors?). I'm using FBSD 7.0 RC-1 which provides the necessary drivers for that controller card. The array is created using RAID5. The problem arises when I fdisk the drive array. The sysinstall installation routine complains that the drive parameters provided by the BIOS is incorrect. When I ask to see the drive info using fdisk, I am given the following information: # fdisk parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are: cylinders=273542 heads=255 sectors/tracks=63 (16065 blks/cyl) Media sector size is 512 Warning: BIOS sector numbering starts with sector 1 Information from BIOS bootblock is: The data for partition 1 is: sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) start 63, size 88484871 (48576 Meg), flag 80 (active) beg: cyl 0/ head 1/ sector 1; end: cyl 1023/ head 165/ sector 59 The data for partition 2 is: The data for partition 3 is: The data for partition 4 is: # I see that when I am finished setting up the drive array, I am getting a much smaller use of the entire array. Using the "Auto Defaults" option inside bsdlabel, I end up with /dev/da0s1f (/usr) in the range of 40 GB. I should be seeing something in the order of 2 TB. I've tried fdisking and bsdlabeling for 2 Tb to no avail several times. What am I doing wrong? ~Doug From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 02:11:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6274E16A41A for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 02:11:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougs@dawnsign.com) Received: from mailfilter.dawnsign.com (cetus.dawnsign.com [216.70.250.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE9013C46A for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 02:11:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougs@dawnsign.com) Received: from cetus.dawnsign.com (cetus.dawnsign.com [192.168.1.5]) by mailfilter.dawnsign.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AE829582C for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:38:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by cetus.dawnsign.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:38:28 -0800 Message-ID: <9DE6EC5B5CF8C84281AE3D7454376A0D6D020D@cetus.dawnsign.com> From: Doug Sampson To: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:38:28 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: 3Ware 9650SE with 4 disk array X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 02:11:29 -0000 Hi, We've received a server containing 3Ware 9650SE controller with 4 ports and it comes with 4 WD7500AYYS drives with the following drive parameters of LBA 1465149168 (sectors?). I'm using FBSD 7.0 RC-1 which provides the necessary drivers for that controller card. The array is created using RAID5. The problem arises when I fdisk the drive array. The sysinstall installation routine complains that the drive parameters provided by the BIOS is incorrect. When I ask to see the drive info using fdisk, I am given the following information: # fdisk parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are: cylinders=273542 heads=255 sectors/tracks=63 (16065 blks/cyl) Media sector size is 512 Warning: BIOS sector numbering starts with sector 1 Information from BIOS bootblock is: The data for partition 1 is: sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) start 63, size 88484871 (48576 Meg), flag 80 (active) beg: cyl 0/ head 1/ sector 1; end: cyl 1023/ head 165/ sector 59 The data for partition 2 is: The data for partition 3 is: The data for partition 4 is: # I see that when I am finished setting up the drive array, I am getting a much smaller use of the entire array. Using the "Auto Defaults" option inside bsdlabel, I end up with /dev/da0s1f (/usr) in the range of 40 GB. I should be seeing something in the order of 2 TB. I've tried fdisking and bsdlabeling for 2 Tb to no avail several times. What am I doing wrong? ~Doug From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 02:36:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2602D16A418 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 02:36:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E2913C45D for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 02:36:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id l8so376306nzf.13 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:36:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=Pct94lEB5puBAGpoGOnotQFEK+efR94nPrJw3RIZMSk=; b=WCYMG/MPQOVjJvhWTv5q3QpZ3LTrqqLoSiGQcY3FWCMKy0Dydv/0qUuP4eUPgE5L81lLDDvl5eGKArVFmfGlB5+6UB86I7sRu5xqdwnev7UkqopT2uZMM4nZk/himIL1gLo2Lw/i8YqmkT06QUyhKrMoaq0aroqAn60pMteA+Qk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=DYFYq8fQEkZcNVvs8Zpj50ncL9Yewj3hKBBstiCF3hUZk+ydIxS/8Jssl+1dVO/rGRzOHVmggbEFe3GOGkqvulbiWDPLTYjalMtWBPgrtdLuqIM82Q1qBzIeHo6bUPQlgLm4sslB60gb7Uvh9H9xNCEpdOBZpvDPmqXJrbrs+yQ= Received: by 10.142.229.4 with SMTP id b4mr949376wfh.158.1200537366597; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:36:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.72.20 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:36:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:36:06 -0800 From: "Kurt Buff" To: "Peter Boosten" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <478E7E67.5090307@boosten.org> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone out there using SSL-Explorer? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 02:36:08 -0000 On Jan 16, 2008 4:35 PM, Kurt Buff wrote: > > On Jan 16, 2008 2:00 PM, Peter Boosten wrote: > > Kurt Buff wrote: > > > > > > > > > Per a private message (thanks, Peter) I learned that 'ant run' is > > > deprecated, and I should instead use 'ant start'. > > > > > > This seems to have no effect, as the output is the same. > > > > > > The README does talk about a wizard, which, after pondering all of > > > this overnight, seems to mean some GUI component that guides you > > > through setup. There is no window manager on this machine, and I don't > > > have X installed, except for what Java/Ant libraries were installed. > > > > > > So, I'm still left with the questions above. > > > > > > > Kurt, > > > > We spoke briefly about 'ant install' opening port 28080... when this > > happens, you can connect your browser to that port > > (http://yourhost:28080 -> this is the wizard the readme is talking > > about). There seems to be some timegap between the installer reporting > > it's ready and the actual opening of the port (I tried last night). > > > > You don't need X (I don't have it), just some patience. When you've > > completed the install (with your browser), the ant will shutdown and you > > can start then sslexplorer with 'ant start'. Again there will be a > > timegap between the ending of the startup script and the opening of the > > port. > > > > > > Peter > > OK - I'll buy that the wizard is the GUI used through a web browser - > that makes sense. > > However, I executed 'ant start' within the directory at the console as > root, while tracking processes in a putty ssh terminal with top during > that execution. I noticed that java was running, but then the ant > process stopped on the console, and in top the java entry disappeared. > Testing after that, with netstat -a, revealed no port open other than > the usual smtp/ssh/ntp ports that I use on any machine. > > Trying to connect with Firefox is unsuccessful at that point. > > As you might surmise, I'm not familiar with ant or java, so am just > bashing about looking for clues. > > Lastly for the moment, I noticed that I didn't have the JRE installed, > so I took the time to download that file and 'make install clean', > then execute 'ant install' and 'ant run', with the same results. > > I have output from both 'ant install' and 'ant run' should anyone care > to take a look. > OK - this is seriously strange. I used the command line # ant -debug -logfile /root/antdebuginstall.txt install and the process now does not exit, and I'm able to bring up the wizard in FF. I'm getting errors trying to authenticate against Active Directory, but I can work through that. Thoughts? Kurt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 03:59:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1860416A418 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 03:59:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rjhjr@cox.net) Received: from eastrmmtao103.cox.net (eastrmmtao103.cox.net [68.230.240.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB3D13C457 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 03:59:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rjhjr@cox.net) Received: from eastrmimpo02.cox.net ([68.1.16.120]) by eastrmmtao101.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20080117033053.SBYL129.eastrmmtao101.cox.net@eastrmimpo02.cox.net> for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:30:53 -0500 Received: from localhost ([68.230.186.138]) by eastrmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id e3WC1Y00F2zbV0s0000000; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:30:12 -0500 Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:30:53 -0500 From: Bob Hall To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080117033053.GA14728@kongemord.krig.net> Mail-Followup-To: Bob Hall , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <6efa8680801161248r4ef067a8u5d6480d996e37f9e@mail.gmail.com> <20080116214248.GB89024@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080116214248.GB89024@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: how to be *nix programmer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 03:59:05 -0000 On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 04:42:48PM -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 03:48:47PM -0500, Radheshyam Bhatt wrote: > > > Hello People, > > > > > > How's it going? I am interested in to developing drivers > > for FreeBSD. How do I go about start learning program for that? What > > books & resources I should look in to. I know C, and I am learning about > > processes, and system calls. Also where would I take my questions to if I > > don't get something and need help for something in system's programming... > > Please email me back.. > > Learning C and probably C++ and maybe some Assembly is good. > > After that, you might want to absorb the McKusic books: 'Design and > Implementaiton of the (4.3 and) 4.4 BSD Operating System. Actually, McKusic's 'Design and Implementaion of the FreeBSD Operating System' might be more useful. It's based on FBSD 5.2, but it's still more up to date. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 04:07:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B63E16A418 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:07:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mtericjl7@yahoo.com) Received: from n4b.bullet.ukl.yahoo.com (n4b.bullet.ukl.yahoo.com [217.146.183.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DEEC413C45B for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:07:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mtericjl7@yahoo.com) Received: from [217.12.4.215] by n4.bullet.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Jan 2008 03:55:20 -0000 Received: from [216.252.122.219] by t2.bullet.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Jan 2008 03:55:20 -0000 Received: from [69.147.65.156] by t4.bullet.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Jan 2008 03:55:20 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp404.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Jan 2008 03:55:20 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 352450.51294.bm@omp404.mail.sp1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 69170 invoked by uid 60001); 17 Jan 2008 03:55:20 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=5L5dLmgbBD72ZXOtAh2IakRkwFYnQBacdjtkgG3ONIppUW+RTnV+OsKw4/TlKBuB8CZhu5Ir+zxQ8bj9Uc6+mvjdqXLpAKN9y+7A/hl/b0UVfypqf/KnJ116aRUv0bBmOi2esnbRJoPsDQFvuVZR8QFweNbUmHzT0oq/0xvasyw=; X-YMail-OSG: UN3NTOMVM1mZBGL.qruLZRDag93zFm5IUXAUmVdUGKR7s3n28g4debyYVjy1diVH9QZCYSWfczvWJajDpIP0tIoZ9ts6KZsdxY3FbBI.uL8m5_yLpYGXklgV9nb9sQ-- Received: from [65.203.56.131] by web45105.mail.sp1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:55:20 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/818.31 YahooMailWebService/0.7.160 Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:55:20 -0800 (PST) From: Eric LaVoie To: questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <160593.63098.qm@web45105.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: external hard drive for mobile pc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:07:47 -0000 Will FreeBSD work if I install it on an external hard drive, connected to a mobile PC via USB or FireWire, as a partition ( the two partitions being the mobile PC's internal Hardrive and this external hard drive which I am asking about.)? If the answer is yes: can you provide me with links to some documentation covering how I would create the partition on the external hard drive ( this partition would cover as much of this drive as possible with the internal one being used for Windows Vista.); and how I can burn bootable DVD-RWs from the .iso image files of FreeBSD which I downloaded from your site? Thank-you for your time, Eric ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 05:49:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D74E016A421 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 05:49:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from per-olof.nilsson2@comhem.se) Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 979FD13C4CC for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 05:49:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from per-olof.nilsson2@comhem.se) Received: from c83-249-36-53.bredband.comhem.se ([83.249.36.53]:62370) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JFNcl-0007Dc-4Y for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 06:49:11 +0100 From: tesolarisc To: FreeBSD quest-list Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-xpKuRGsb7cdaXNZC2FEp" Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 06:49:31 +0100 Message-Id: <1200548971.2924.14.camel@zeus.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Originating-IP: 83.249.36.53 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1JFNcl-0007Dc-4Y. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1JFNcl-0007Dc-4Y 03daf342643969167ddddc3ff9a992e9 Subject: recomendations for webb shop software X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 05:49:12 -0000 --=-xpKuRGsb7cdaXNZC2FEp Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear listmembers. I want to learn about the "webb shop thing". Are there someone that can recomend software worth having a look at. I think of a webb site with forms that's connected to a database with order and update mecanisms. I will only use the software to learn. Cincerely --=20 /peo ---------------------------------------------- - PGP signed/encrypted emails is prefered -=20 ---------------------------------------------- =20 [novice about this? ~> visit: www.gnupg.org] --=-xpKuRGsb7cdaXNZC2FEp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkeO7GYACgkQgWSfflYlIbz/7wCg7UWjD/vGv1WaSn1HnqOT3Wah qpYAn0ruLhZehm8oy+TtB5KbmkRajAOM =nUHa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-xpKuRGsb7cdaXNZC2FEp-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 08:10:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757F816A41B for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:10:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from mx1.highperformance.net (dsl081-163-122.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.163.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3363C13C4CC for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:10:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from w16.stradamotorsports.com (w16.stradamotorsports.com [192.168.1.16]) by mx1.highperformance.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0H89xtu043487 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:09:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Message-ID: <478F0D5A.9090107@highperformance.net> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:10:02 -0800 From: "Jason C. Wells" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd general questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=2.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_05 autolearn=failed version=3.1.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.6 (2006-10-03) on s4.stradamotorsports.com Subject: Gutman Method on Empty Space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:10:01 -0000 Can anyone recommend a utility for the secure overwriting of unused disc space? I am a satisfied customer of "Eraser" for Windows. I'm looking for the same thing for FreeBSD. Thanks, Jason C. Wells From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 08:14:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60E3016A419 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:14:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcs@draenor.org) Received: from mx.unseen.co.za (mx.unseen.co.za [192.96.96.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E3A13C457 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:14:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcs@draenor.org) Received: from marcs by aztec.co.za with local (Exim 4.34) id 1JFPt8-0003Hp-7D; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:14:14 +0200 Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:14:14 +0200 From: Marc Silver To: "Jason C. Wells" Message-ID: <20080117081414.GB12470@draenor.org> References: <478F0D5A.9090107@highperformance.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <478F0D5A.9090107@highperformance.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-PGP-Key: http://draenor.org/pubkey.asc Cc: freebsd general questions Subject: Re: Gutman Method on Empty Space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:14:16 -0000 Hi there, Check out /usr/ports/security/wipe/ - It should meet your requirements. Cheers, Marc On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 12:10:02AM -0800, Jason C. Wells wrote: > Can anyone recommend a utility for the secure overwriting of unused > disc space? I am a satisfied customer of "Eraser" for Windows. I'm > looking for the same thing for FreeBSD. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 08:22:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1677116A417 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:22:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@boosten.org) Received: from smtpq2.tilbu1.nb.home.nl (smtpq2.tilbu1.nb.home.nl [213.51.146.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E7B13C478 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:22:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@boosten.org) Received: from [213.51.146.190] (port=42186 helo=smtp1.tilbu1.nb.home.nl) by smtpq2.tilbu1.nb.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JFQ1D-0007M5-Pz; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:22:35 +0100 Received: from cp268254-a.landg1.lb.home.nl ([84.25.65.88]:4974 helo=ra.egypt.nl) by smtp1.tilbu1.nb.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JFQ1D-0002Iy-3x; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:22:35 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (xp.egypt.nl [192.168.13.35]) by ra.egypt.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A26839877; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:22:34 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <478F1049.3000706@boosten.org> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:22:33 +0100 From: Peter Boosten User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marc Silver References: <478F0D5A.9090107@highperformance.net> <20080117081414.GB12470@draenor.org> In-Reply-To: <20080117081414.GB12470@draenor.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080116-1, 01/16/2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Cc: "Jason C. Wells" , freebsd general questions Subject: Re: Gutman Method on Empty Space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:22:38 -0000 Marc Silver wrote: > Hi there, > > Check out /usr/ports/security/wipe/ - It should meet your requirements. > Or always 'rm -P' :-) Peter -- http://www.boosten.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 08:38:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3280B16A419 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:38:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcs@draenor.org) Received: from mx.unseen.co.za (mx.unseen.co.za [192.96.96.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D1B13C43E for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:38:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcs@draenor.org) Received: from marcs by aztec.co.za with local (Exim 4.34) id 1JFQGj-00045A-89; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:38:37 +0200 Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:38:37 +0200 From: Marc Silver To: Peter Boosten Message-ID: <20080117083837.GC12470@draenor.org> References: <478F0D5A.9090107@highperformance.net> <20080117081414.GB12470@draenor.org> <478F1049.3000706@boosten.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <478F1049.3000706@boosten.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-PGP-Key: http://draenor.org/pubkey.asc Cc: "Jason C. Wells" , freebsd general questions Subject: Re: Gutman Method on Empty Space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:38:46 -0000 Hi there, On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 09:22:33AM +0100, Peter Boosten wrote: > Or always 'rm -P' :-) Nice... never knew about this. That said, this won't satisfy the Gutmann requirement as far as I understand it and overwriting a file three times is not considered a true secure wipe of data. This data would still be theoretically recoverable. Cheers, Marc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 08:47:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 383C216A418 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:47:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66FEC13C442 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:47:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0H8hD7g001605; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:43:13 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0H8h7om001602; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:43:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:43:07 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: "Jason C. Wells" In-Reply-To: <478F0D5A.9090107@highperformance.net> Message-ID: <20080117094305.R1563@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <478F0D5A.9090107@highperformance.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd general questions Subject: Re: Gutman Method on Empty Space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:47:45 -0000 man dd On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Jason C. Wells wrote: > Can anyone recommend a utility for the secure overwriting of unused disc > space? I am a satisfied customer of "Eraser" for Windows. I'm looking for > the same thing for FreeBSD. > > Thanks, > Jason C. Wells > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 08:53:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED3D16A421 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:53:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from assarix@pandora.be) Received: from yergi.telenet-ops.be (yergi.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A42A13C457 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:53:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from assarix@pandora.be) Received: from hoboi3bl4.telenet-ops.be (unknown [195.130.137.79]) by yergi.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3256B5CA055 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:43:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from hoboe3bl6.telenet-ops.be (hoboe3bl6.telenet-ops.be [195.130.136.42]) by hoboi3bl4.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04EB013C008; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:42:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from nocme1bl6.telenet-ops.be (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hoboe3bl6.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F9C2FA9E4; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:42:59 +0100 (CET) From: "Tom Van Looy" To: "Radheshyam Bhatt" Importance: Normal Sensitivity: Normal Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [81.83.46.237] X-Forwarded-For: [10.10.1.191] Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:42:58 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to be *nix programmer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: assarix@pandora.be List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:53:42 -0000 This is a very good book: http://www.informit.com/store/product.aspx?isbn=0201702452&rl=1 Also these are very nice resources, it know it's NetBSD: http://www.netbsd.org/docs/kernel/index.html http://www.netbsd.org/docs/internals/en/index.html Kind regards, Tom >----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- >Van: Radheshyam Bhatt [mailto:bhattr@gmail.com] >Verzonden: woensdag, januari 16, 2008 09:48 PM >Aan: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Onderwerp: how to be *nix programmer > >Hello People, > > > How's it going? I am interested in to developing drivers >for FreeBSD. How do I go about start learning program for that? What >books & resources I should look in to. I know C, and I am learning about >processes, and system calls. Also where would I take my questions to if I >don't get something and need help for something in system's programming... >Please email me back.. > > >thanks in advance, > >Good Day, >Radheshyam >bhattr@gmail.com >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 09:02:18 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3225316A419 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:02:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcs@draenor.org) Received: from mx.unseen.co.za (mx.unseen.co.za [192.96.96.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF75313C461 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:02:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcs@draenor.org) Received: from marcs by aztec.co.za with local (Exim 4.34) id 1JFQdW-0005Lo-AQ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:02:10 +0200 Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:02:10 +0200 From: Marc Silver To: Wojciech Puchar Message-ID: <20080117090210.GD12470@draenor.org> References: <478F0D5A.9090107@highperformance.net> <20080117081414.GB12470@draenor.org> <478F1049.3000706@boosten.org> <20080117083837.GC12470@draenor.org> <20080117094332.K1563@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080117094332.K1563@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-PGP-Key: http://draenor.org/pubkey.asc Cc: "Jason C. Wells" , freebsd general questions , Peter Boosten Subject: Re: Gutman Method on Empty Space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:02:18 -0000 Hi there, On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 09:43:46AM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > how? even single write is enough Not according to the paper that Gutmann wrote: http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/sec96/full_papers/gutmann/ In short, he says that if you know how the data itself was overwritten it can be recovered. If I recall, the DoD standard for the deletion of data is to overwrite it 3 times. Obviously it all comes down to how important the data is that you're removing, but a single write is not enough if the data needs to be disposed of 'securely'. Cheers, Marc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 09:02:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E72A16A468 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:02:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F0E13C47E for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:02:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0H8hocp001612; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:43:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0H8hkI2001609; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:43:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:43:46 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Marc Silver In-Reply-To: <20080117083837.GC12470@draenor.org> Message-ID: <20080117094332.K1563@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <478F0D5A.9090107@highperformance.net> <20080117081414.GB12470@draenor.org> <478F1049.3000706@boosten.org> <20080117083837.GC12470@draenor.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: "Jason C. Wells" , freebsd general questions , Peter Boosten Subject: Re: Gutman Method on Empty Space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:02:40 -0000 > That said, this won't satisfy the Gutmann requirement as far as I > understand it and overwriting a file three times is not considered a > true secure wipe of data. This data would still be theoretically > recoverable. how? even single write is enough From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 09:59:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40B2516A41B for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:59:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from valerio.daelli@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E0913C4E5 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:59:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from valerio.daelli@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so993609waf.3 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 01:59:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=ruqh3d6FpBVYX3IdyQqFp8rVZgqhlVVhfM1iS5iO9A8=; b=bMV/neywK7WRGrH//l4Xs3yf7uXZcdy6ICZbRy2I+k20y8dBo39bmelLT00fao7Ia1YYGr6TmE3emsg46eFFx4Uh/Ex2aa9mxgMkBZCyFmR+akAkKWywI4P0eG04boma5vm1NEnUTfkq0CwDT2t0ROFAPfaNrztq/lu9fJsKEmo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=GBub73oiZA9UEFnpUHP5rpaI9suZ3bnvLAdp7jOQpFtdCWUcF61I3FH5eC6NxmQ8hiFSScSMh+ohjT5m7hEWgYDbHy8EFFMxXKAFUUIieFpvTj/fFliIuoF+sPv/RuMAAanyCpDMIvkFVGcfVjASnBLSdXxkrfUpZ5VSzRhzwnw= Received: by 10.114.53.1 with SMTP id b1mr2177069waa.134.1200563988237; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 01:59:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.12.11 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 01:59:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <27dbfc8c0801170159v3f72ad6cg9f8bd6e8a19735de@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:59:48 +0100 From: "Valerio Daelli" To: freebsd-questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: nfsv4: strange things happen X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:59:50 -0000 Hi we have a Solaris 10 NFS server and a FreebSD 7.0 NFS client. We have a couple of NFSv4 mounted filesystem on the client. nest.ifom-ieo-campus.it:/data/exports/obj/bsd7.ifom-ieo-campus.it/obj /mnt/nest nfs rw,-r=16384,-w=16384,tcp,-4 2 0 nest.ifom-ieo-campus.it:/data/exports/jails/bsd7.ifom-ieo-campus.it/jails /jails nfs rw,-r=16384,-w=16384,tcp,-4 2 0 We are having strange issues: for example - we cannot execute binaries on the mounted filesystems - if we umount one of the two filesystem from the client, the other filesystem must be remounted, otherwise a process the is writing on it exit with errors. For example we have a iozone running on /mnt/nest and we umount /jails, the iozoine exits with: Can not open temp file: iozone.tmp open: Unknown error: 10011 root@bsd7:/mnt/nest/iozone/nfs4 Is anybody using nfsv4 between a Solaris 10 server and a FreebSD 7.0 client? Are you having problems on it? This is our FreeBSD version: root@bsd7:~ uname -a FreeBSD bsd7.ifom-ieo-campus.it 7.0-RC1 FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 #0: Fri Jan 11 19:22:50 CET 2008 root@bsd7.ifom-ieo-campus.it:/mnt/nest/usr/src/sys/BSD7 i386 (everything si running fine on nfsv3). Bye and thanks for your help Valerio Daelli From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 10:34:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98A7916A418 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:34:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wtf.jlaine@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D5613C44B for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:34:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wtf.jlaine@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so148419anc.13 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 02:34:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=8MYFHxVI3bVwwe8wPqoyKQyDZcVM40IibHfvGcDG7gk=; b=sGowKcqirZH2nskNHaGzetiLhsatWV7fhlvLmvVapyPsYvV+5bjb4WpPj5iE6PYbW1TbVv56HScRNsz5Wlgudm1jkQqc4fIL6ieDJLf88PM6ofDelf9moPTurTLAKbQNMtvRLJlX8Fd1LyqFMvMJrQptdKRz+CPxquMi2eDLnGY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=RBw0plCs2fjnmD0ZfzAogKRclFilrkhN+eBsBrnCpI1H/fwFgH0dObzcdu2weiLsjLbR0/CcN0+QCTSPU4gFRBzOKqNiDT+4DMn7azOd9dasaPMD172FFVqefSkcabMlOjnqc/yPYn/r3mogaHmLIGEcS2DFQgSfMN8kjH5C/NM= Received: by 10.100.120.15 with SMTP id s15mr4046757anc.62.1200566065685; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 02:34:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.163.5 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 02:34:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2b98f2f70801170234n36652af2jb63f64ab24950f36@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:34:25 +0500 From: "Jeff Laine" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: release or rc? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:34:26 -0000 Hi to all. Stupid question here ) I've cvsup'ed recently from 6.1 to RELENG_6_3. All seems to works pretty well right now. There are plenty of new drivers and fixes that I needed so much! Many thanks to developers! But now "uname -a" says it's 6.3-RELEASE. I thought it would be 6.3-RC2 . Is it still "release candidate" or not? Thanks, --Jeff-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 11:03:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B479516A419 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:03:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from netslists@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 416C513C458 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:03:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from netslists@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so711151fgg.35 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 03:03:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rSgOY0IjfNAz6Xdggoq6K0QbNbjs487UNeJZyYTBVq8=; b=v51eDKLlupBhuJfxlI3/pAYe5jrr1oqN7CaIKNZAZ9CwStnNN/7mGa63yvUKt8ddDYeOtVabC2fmudM6cH8DPvZcSil85KwBU4tmemMoAfRDufGd/h2Ulv8HmTyhV4/5/ECtq8uh+RBsqAYbQVjz6Pk5572XDhjjdwFBV6+W9ZM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ZgZyh+lEuQtGZOd4pCinPab9NW3YIRv5nbAHtkl4Rl23Y059TDsRZ5HGEXm5/hy9yeR/rlEKWYcE7qpnqpUJ+K0GgK61wrB0G1+r+kqwBlnVzyssn3MevWO13h44Y3gFZR3LIEMOsyQgaHE8Sth61TqfOJ8w5vw3MyJh106HmzU= Received: by 10.86.51.2 with SMTP id y2mr1796206fgy.17.1200567784166; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 03:03:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.9.8? ( [91.135.49.10]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e20sm2974725fga.1.2008.01.17.03.03.02 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 17 Jan 2008 03:03:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <478F35E4.2090606@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:03:00 +0100 From: Sten Daniel Soersdal User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Radheshyam Bhatt References: <6efa8680801161248r4ef067a8u5d6480d996e37f9e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6efa8680801161248r4ef067a8u5d6480d996e37f9e@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to be *nix programmer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:03:05 -0000 Radheshyam Bhatt wrote: > Hello People, > > > How's it going? I am interested in to developing drivers > for FreeBSD. How do I go about start learning program for that? What > books & resources I should look in to. I know C, and I am learning about > processes, and system calls. Also where would I take my questions to if I > don't get something and need help for something in system's programming... > Please email me back.. > I would recommend reading: "The Design and Implementation of the FreeBSD Operating System" by by Marshall Kirk McKusick (Author), George V. Neville-Neil (Author) The questions go where they are appropriate (scsi driver? perhaps freebsd-scsi@ or freebsd-hackers@ ?). -- Sten Daniel Soersdal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 12:15:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6DD016A41B for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:15:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nec556@retena.com) Received: from s21sec.com (mail.s21sec.com [212.31.206.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A78813C45A for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:15:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nec556@retena.com) Received: from inv-008.s21sec.com (unknown [83.175.204.210]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by s21sec.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F005B219D for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:45:37 +0100 (CET) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:56:15 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Eduardo Morras In-Reply-To: <478F35E4.2090606@gmail.com> References: <6efa8680801161248r4ef067a8u5d6480d996e37f9e@mail.gmail.com> <478F35E4.2090606@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Message-Id: <20080117114537.7F005B219D@s21sec.com> Subject: Re: how to be *nix programmer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:15:55 -0000 At 12:03 17/01/2008, you wrote: >Radheshyam Bhatt wrote: >>Hello People, >> >> How's it going? I am interested in to developing drivers >>for FreeBSD. How do I go about start learning program for that? What >>books & resources I should look in to. I know C, and I am learning about >>processes, and system calls. Also where would I take my questions to if I >>don't get something and need help for something in system's programming... >>Please email me back.. > >I would recommend reading: >"The Design and Implementation of the FreeBSD Operating System" >by by Marshall Kirk McKusick (Author), George V. Neville-Neil (Author) > >The questions go where they are appropriate (scsi driver? perhaps >freebsd-scsi@ or freebsd-hackers@ ?). But there is no maillist for general programming FreeBSD, only specific ones. Perhaps a list for newbies FreeBSD programmers can fill the gap. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Useful Acronyms : FAQ = Frecuently Answered Questions From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 12:30:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE8A916A419 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:30:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from viefep34-int.chello.at (viefep18-int.chello.at [213.46.255.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42E1813C43E for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:30:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from [192.168.1.103] (really [80.99.119.201]) by viefep34-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.08.02.00 201-2186-121-20061213) with ESMTP id <20080117123024.ELGL6701.viefep34-int.chello.at@[192.168.1.103]>; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:30:24 +0100 Message-ID: <478F4A5F.6070804@shopzeus.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:30:23 +0100 From: Laszlo Nagy User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Laine , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <2b98f2f70801170234n36652af2jb63f64ab24950f36@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2b98f2f70801170234n36652af2jb63f64ab24950f36@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: release or rc? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:30:27 -0000 Jeff Laine wrote: > Hi to all. > > Stupid question here ) > I've cvsup'ed recently from 6.1 to RELENG_6_3. All seems to works pretty > well right now. There are plenty of new drivers and fixes that I needed so > much! Many thanks to developers! > But now "uname -a" says it's 6.3-RELEASE. I thought it would be 6.3-RC2 . > Is it still "release candidate" or not? > Usually it means that this is a new RELEASE, but it is not announced until all mirrors and ftp sites have the right thing up. Whew, so now we have 7.0 release? :-) Laszlo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 13:25:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B2B816A419 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:25:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA01F13C4D9 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:25:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from c83-253-25-183.bredband.comhem.se ([83.253.25.183]:55615 helo=falcon.midgard.homeip.net) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JFUkT-0006hl-8M for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:25:37 +0100 Received: (qmail 1853 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2008 14:25:29 +0100 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with ESMTP; 17 Jan 2008 14:25:29 +0100 Received: (qmail 79258 invoked by uid 1001); 17 Jan 2008 14:25:29 +0100 Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:25:29 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson To: Laszlo Nagy Message-ID: <20080117132529.GA79238@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: Laszlo Nagy , Jeff Laine , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <2b98f2f70801170234n36652af2jb63f64ab24950f36@mail.gmail.com> <478F4A5F.6070804@shopzeus.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <478F4A5F.6070804@shopzeus.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Originating-IP: 83.253.25.183 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1JFUkT-0006hl-8M. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1JFUkT-0006hl-8M 413479c3402fc6888941ac0dcd0daa50 Cc: Jeff Laine , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: release or rc? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:25:39 -0000 On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 01:30:23PM +0100, Laszlo Nagy wrote: > Jeff Laine wrote: >> Hi to all. >> >> Stupid question here ) >> I've cvsup'ed recently from 6.1 to RELENG_6_3. All seems to works pretty >> well right now. There are plenty of new drivers and fixes that I needed so >> much! Many thanks to developers! >> But now "uname -a" says it's 6.3-RELEASE. I thought it would be 6.3-RC2 . >> Is it still "release candidate" or not? >> > Usually it means that this is a new RELEASE, but it is not announced until > all mirrors and ftp sites have the right thing up. But sometimes there is a last minute bug found that means things have to be rebuilt again. It should be considered a release candidate until the official announcement has been made. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 14:09:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37A6716A417 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:09:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darryl@osborne-ind.com) Received: from ws2.cnweb.com (ws2.cnweb.com [69.50.194.62]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12C3313C442 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:09:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darryl@osborne-ind.com) Received: (qmail 7241 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2008 08:09:14 -0600 Received: from p245n23.ruraltel.net (HELO Europa) (24.225.23.245) by ws2.cnweb.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2008 08:09:14 -0600 From: "Darryl Hoar" To: Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:08:29 -0600 Message-ID: <99124A853AFF41EFB4326AE342D51F10@Europa> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6000.16545 Importance: Normal Subject: CPu Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: darryl@osborne-ind.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:09:19 -0000 Greetings, Looking to purchase a server that I will run Freebsd on. It will be a FAMP server. I am trying to decide buying used or new. Used server has (2) Xeon 2.8GHZ processors with 512K cache. New server has Dual Core Xeon 1.6Ghz with 4MB cache and 1066 front side bus. In a smaller environment (50 users) will processor selection make any real difference ? Website with some simple php scripting and mysql databases tied in . thanks for any advice, Darryl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 14:23:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D8316A417 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:23:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from viefep14-int.chello.at (viefep18-int.chello.at [213.46.255.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809B613C459 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:23:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from [192.168.1.103] (really [80.99.119.201]) by viefep14-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.08.02.00 201-2186-121-20061213) with ESMTP id <20080117142312.YJLQ23496.viefep14-int.chello.at@[192.168.1.103]> for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:23:12 +0100 Message-ID: <478F64CF.7000603@shopzeus.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:23:11 +0100 From: Laszlo Nagy User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: routing question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:23:15 -0000 Hi, I have this configuration: Internet -----> [Hw Router] ---- (LAN1: 192.168.2.0/24) -----> [ 192.168.2.138 GatewayComp 192.168.0.1 ] ------ (LAN2: 192.168.0.0/24) I would like to access a computer from LAN1 to LAN2. LAN1 machine is: FreeBSD office1adsl.dyndns.org 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Fri Jan 12 10:40:27 UTC 2007 root@dessler.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 office1adsl# ifconfig fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=8 inet 192.168.2.114 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.2.255 ether 00:50:8b:f7:30:24 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active plip0: flags=108810 mtu 1500 lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 office1adsl# netstat -nr Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default 192.168.2.1 UGS 0 1262107 fxp0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 127122 lo0 192.168.0 192.168.2.138 UGS 0 4 fxp0 192.168.2 link#1 UC 0 0 fxp0 192.168.2.1 00:13:f7:26:42:69 UHLW 2 108 fxp0 1188 192.168.2.138 00:50:fc:8c:f6:62 UHLW 2 1469 fxp0 143 192.168.2.255 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff UHLWb 1 10044 fxp0 Internet6: Destination Gateway Flags Netif Expire ::1 ::1 UHL lo0 fe80::%lo0/64 fe80::1%lo0 U lo0 fe80::1%lo0 link#3 UHL lo0 ff01:3::/32 fe80::1%lo0 UC lo0 ff02::%lo0/32 fe80::1%lo0 UC lo0 office1adsl# ipfw show ipfw: getsockopt(IP_FW_GET): Protocol not available GatewayComp machine is: cassiopeia# uname -a FreeBSD cassiopeia.ronet 6.2-RELEASE-p7 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p7 #5: Wed Aug 29 14:18:01 EDT 2007 gandalf@cassiopeia.ronet:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CASSIOPEIA i386 cassiopeia# ifconfig myk0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=2b inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 ether 00:17:31:c3:d2:fe media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX ) status: active rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=8 inet 192.168.2.138 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.2.255 ether 00:50:fc:8c:f6:62 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 cassiopeia# netstat -nr Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default 192.168.2.1 UGS 0 16241 rl0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 4600 lo0 192.168.0 link#1 UC 0 0 myk0 192.168.0.121 00:02:a5:23:f3:d0 UHLW 1 153132 myk0 121 192.168.0.126 00:02:a5:e5:19:39 UHLW 1 94435 myk0 581 192.168.0.128 00:02:a5:c8:65:f8 UHLW 1 230797 myk0 130 192.168.0.130 00:02:a5:e0:e1:9c UHLW 1 124633 myk0 306 192.168.0.131 00:02:a5:e0:c8:f4 UHLW 1 258495 myk0 165 192.168.0.132 00:02:a5:08:76:85 UHLW 1 161701 myk0 957 192.168.2 link#2 UC 0 0 rl0 192.168.2.1 00:13:f7:26:42:69 UHLW 2 30 rl0 1127 192.168.2.114 00:50:8b:f7:30:24 UHLW 2 1876 rl0 72 192.168.2.138 00:50:fc:8c:f6:62 UHLW 1 70 lo0 cassiopeia# grep gateway /etc/rc.conf gateway_enable="YES" cassiopeia# ipfw show 00001 29588 12691049 allow ip from any to any 00002 0 0 allow udp from any to any 00003 0 0 allow tcp from any to any 00100 9512 297448 allow ip from any to any via lo0 00200 0 0 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 00300 0 0 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any 65000 2172178 1136712828 allow ip from any to any 65535 1 330 deny ip from any to any cassiopeia# Now, here is what I try from LAN1 machine: office1adsl# ping 192.168.0.132 PING 192.168.0.132 (192.168.0.132): 56 data bytes ^C --- 192.168.0.132 ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss office1adsl# telnet 192.168.0.132 5900 Trying 192.168.0.132... ^C The same from the GatewayComp machine: cassiopeia# ping 192.168.0.132 PING 192.168.0.132 (192.168.0.132): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 192.168.0.132: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.252 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.132: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.259 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.132: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.247 ms ^C --- 192.168.0.132 ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.247/0.253/0.259/0.005 ms cassiopeia# telnet 192.168.0.132 5900 Trying 192.168.0.132... Connected to 192.168.0.132. Escape character is '^]'. RFB 003.008 ^C ^CConnection closed by foreign host. cassiopeia# Question: what is wrong with this confing? What should I change if I want to access LAN2 from LAN1? Thanks, Laszlo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 15:12:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FB3416A417 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:12:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stapleton.41@gmail.com) Received: from hs-out-2122.google.com (hs-out-0708.google.com [64.233.178.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51E4F13C45D for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:12:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stapleton.41@gmail.com) Received: by hs-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id h53so553835hsh.11 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:12:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=pM8qmGI30+rDmfRCDH22TnBXB4x/1WBgVXO53oNVDXU=; b=QPkFMI9hR+0EcdyxIyTrZAftyIMUDoG+2NKpwOd1BvEMDGVcqb0+kizvlNf1y/f1Q6DEwaK7mNtR9VAtnRsOzNytQYsGseHENuVNLhQDG7Z3cC/3KO8Y0JBliBoqko0ygxeVTi+7OMyrrgbEcdxopxmbMf39Z8GTjPHJX+Bj8jw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=QNC1e7eI+uDcpBmZNE76PnutIkEpCHNlx5643xo22XYZK6wrgZtyUFBZOXL8KYJa2AAB+uBXJaLa/NZ/4peTK0jBqWQQ6RiOSjeuG1PXWKFkI10JBQkMNWL0SX/z6p1fchqTfmd8txXG2ldQuVlLQH/sUP8dHixoK7MTvQ+z6dY= Received: by 10.100.106.1 with SMTP id e1mr4632380anc.10.1200582735866; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:12:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.178.16 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:12:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <80f4f2b20801170712g67cb5028wfda685ab118acb78@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:12:15 -0500 From: "Jim Stapleton" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, darryl@osborne-ind.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: CPu Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:12:17 -0000 > In a smaller environment (50 users) will processor selection make > any real difference ? Website with some simple php scripting and > mysql databases tied in . This is a very tough question to answer. If you already have a test environment, see how it works on your current hardware, and ascertain the locations of the bottlenecks. All of the following are possible in your situation: -> Network: What is your server using? What is the average connection speed for the users. All the CPU speed in the world won't help you if you are attempting to pump out 50 100k pages a second on a 56k line. -> Disk: How much information are you pulling off of the disk? If you are doing complex queries on a 1GByte table, and server multi-megabyte files, and using an ATA66 drive without a RAID setup, that disk is probably going to be a slowdown for your system, and running 4x Quad Core Xeons (core-based, not netburst) overclocked to 5Ghz won't be noticably faster than a single Pentium 4 and 2.8Ghz. (OK, that might be a slight exaggeration). Memory is helpful in this case. Memory can help here too. -> CPU: How much is there in the way of calculations? Are the queries simple or complex? Are there a lot of loops (even a "simple" program with a lot of loops or recursion can be very CPU intensive)? If it is just serving up pages with fairly simple [insert web language of choice] code and SQL queries, the old K6-III 450Mhz I have for my home server is more than sufficient for a fairly large number of users. For simple timestamps and stylsheet spitting Scripting/SQL, that machine should be able to handle 50 users at a time without a problem. So, in the end, we can't answer your question without more information, but hopefully this will help you answer it. How fast will the machine need to pull data off the disk? How fast will it need to write the data? How much of the data can reside in memory (if it'll all fit in memory, then disk IO isn't nearly as big of a deal?), and how calculation intensive is your code? Does that help answer your question? -Jim Stapleton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 15:16:25 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C74F216A468 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:16:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: from pearl.ibctech.ca (pearl.ibctech.ca [208.70.104.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74BB413C46A for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:16:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 66458 invoked by uid 1002); 17 Jan 2008 15:16:24 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:RC:1(208.70.104.100):. Processed in 6.630139 secs); 17 Jan 2008 15:16:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.30.110?) (steve@ibctech.ca@208.70.104.100) by pearl.ibctech.ca with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 17 Jan 2008 15:16:17 -0000 Message-ID: <478F7142.8040506@ibctech.ca> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:16:18 -0500 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Laszlo Nagy References: <478F64CF.7000603@shopzeus.com> In-Reply-To: <478F64CF.7000603@shopzeus.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: routing question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:16:25 -0000 > Internet -----> [Hw Router] ---- (LAN1: 192.168.2.0/24) -----> [ > 192.168.2.138 GatewayComp 192.168.0.1 ] ------ (LAN2: 192.168.0.0/24) > > I would like to access a computer from LAN1 to LAN2. Perform the following and post the results of: - ping from GatewayComp to pc on 0.0 network and a pc on 2.0 network - ping from pc on 2.0 network to 192.168.0.1 - ping from pc on 0.0 network to 192.168.2.138 - sysctl -a net.inet.ip.forwarding (on the GatewayComp) Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 15:20:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E48016A418 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:20:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darryl@osborne-ind.com) Received: from ws2.cnweb.com (ws2.cnweb.com [69.50.194.62]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CC2E13C4D9 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:20:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darryl@osborne-ind.com) Received: (qmail 28822 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2008 09:20:28 -0600 Received: from p245n23.ruraltel.net (HELO Europa) (24.225.23.245) by ws2.cnweb.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2008 09:20:28 -0600 From: "Darryl Hoar" To: "'Jim Stapleton'" , In-Reply-To: <80f4f2b20801170712g67cb5028wfda685ab118acb78@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:19:29 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6000.16545 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: CPu Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: darryl@osborne-ind.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:20:34 -0000 > In a smaller environment (50 users) will processor selection make > any real difference ? Website with some simple php scripting and > mysql databases tied in . -->> Network: 100Mb switched soon to be GB switched. -> Disk: How much information are you pulling off of the disk? If you are doing complex queries on a 1GByte table, and server multi-megabyte files, and using an ATA66 drive without a RAID setup, that disk is probably going to be a slowdown for your system, and running 4x Quad Core Xeons (core-based, not netburst) overclocked to 5Ghz won't be noticably faster than a single Pentium 4 and 2.8Ghz. (OK, that might be a slight exaggeration). Memory is helpful in this case. Memory can help here too. -->> Disk: Databases will be text lookup (think customer records, and a bug tracker). sorting records will possibly be on multiple keys. Data insertion will be VERY low volume. -> CPU: How much is there in the way of calculations? Are the queries simple or complex? Are there a lot of loops (even a "simple" program with a lot of loops or recursion can be very CPU intensive)? -->>CPU: Don't expect queries to be super complex. Every once in a while there might be a more complex query, but meat and potatoes will be simple. Does that help answer your question? -->> partially -Jim Stapleton --Darryl -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.6/1229 - Release Date: 1/17/2008 11:12 AM From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 15:24:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E11C16A41A for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:24:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from viefep33-int.chello.at (viefep18-int.chello.at [213.46.255.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC4D13C4DD for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:24:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from [192.168.1.103] (really [80.99.119.201]) by viefep33-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.08.02.00 201-2186-121-20061213) with ESMTP id <20080117152412.CATC28696.viefep33-int.chello.at@[192.168.1.103]>; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:24:12 +0100 Message-ID: <478F731B.5050201@shopzeus.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:24:11 +0100 From: Laszlo Nagy User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Bertrand References: <478F64CF.7000603@shopzeus.com> <478F7142.8040506@ibctech.ca> In-Reply-To: <478F7142.8040506@ibctech.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: routing question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:24:15 -0000 Steve Bertrand wrote: >> Internet -----> [Hw Router] ---- (LAN1: 192.168.2.0/24) -----> [ >> 192.168.2.138 GatewayComp 192.168.0.1 ] ------ (LAN2: 192.168.0.0/24) >> >> I would like to access a computer from LAN1 to LAN2. >> > > Perform the following and post the results of: > > - ping from GatewayComp to pc on 0.0 network and a pc on 2.0 network > cassiopeia# ping 192.168.2.114 PING 192.168.2.114 (192.168.2.114): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 192.168.2.114: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.171 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.2.114: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.184 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.2.114: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.229 ms ^C --- 192.168.2.114 ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.171/0.195/0.229/0.025 ms cassiopeia# ping 192.168.0.132 PING 192.168.0.132 (192.168.0.132): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 192.168.0.132: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.260 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.132: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.235 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.132: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.133 ms ^C --- 192.168.0.132 ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.133/0.209/0.260/0.055 ms cassiopeia# > - ping from pc on 2.0 network to 192.168.0.1 > office1adsl# ping 192.168.0.1 PING 192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.270 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.456 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.178 ms ^C --- 192.168.0.1 ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.178/0.301/0.456/0.116 ms > - ping from pc on 0.0 network to 192.168.2.138 > Well, I cannot do this from here. Those computers are X terminals, they do not run inetd nor sshd. I cannot login from here and I cannot leave now, but I can do it later if necessary. > - sysctl -a net.inet.ip.forwarding (on the GatewayComp) > cassiopeia# sysctl -a net.inet.ip.forwarding net.inet.ip.forwarding: 1 cassiopeia# I can answer the missed question in about an hour. Thanks, Laszlo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 15:32:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD0CD16A420 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:32:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB0DE13C4E8 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:32:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JFWjb-0008Q8-8l for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:32:51 -0800 Message-ID: <14921862.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:32:51 -0800 (PST) From: cathlyn rubio To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <000601c5e7d8$6813afc0$0301a8c0@mindcrash> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Nabble-From: explosiveadvertising12@gmail.com References: <000601c5e7d8$6813afc0$0301a8c0@mindcrash> Subject: Re: Problems with hard drives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:32:51 -0000 have you your BIOS? Javier Matos wrote: >=20 > Hi, I was trying to install FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT in my box but when I do > it... Usually my hard drive make a strange noise... and the screen show > DMA problems (ok, it may be the hard drive)... but... I change my hard > drive and I take one more time problems with the hard drive... (ok, it ma= y > be the hard drive, the second hard drive that is broke... maybe)... I tak= e > a third hard drive and have the same problem... but... I don't know If is > possible to have bad luck to put 3 hard drivers brokens... . Anyone is > having problems with FreeBSD and Seagate hard drives? > My system is so unstable and I don=C2=B4t know how to solve the situation= ... > hard drives hare Seagate 160 Gb SATA > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 >=20 ----- http://www.binaryz.com http://www.binaryz.com=20 --=20 View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Problems-with-hard-driv= es-tp1457453p14921862.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 15:33:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F1BA16A420 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:33:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3654113C45A for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:33:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m0HFV75e093639; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:31:07 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m0HFV7Pb093638; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:31:07 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:31:07 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Bob Hall , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080117153107.GC93480@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <6efa8680801161248r4ef067a8u5d6480d996e37f9e@mail.gmail.com> <20080116214248.GB89024@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20080117033053.GA14728@kongemord.krig.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080117033053.GA14728@kongemord.krig.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Jerry McAllister Subject: Re: how to be *nix programmer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:33:31 -0000 On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 10:30:53PM -0500, Bob Hall wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 04:42:48PM -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 03:48:47PM -0500, Radheshyam Bhatt wrote: > > > > > Hello People, > > > > > > How's it going? I am interested in to developing drivers > > > for FreeBSD. How do I go about start learning program for that? What > > > books & resources I should look in to. I know C, and I am learning about > > > processes, and system calls. Also where would I take my questions to if I > > > don't get something and need help for something in system's programming... > > > Please email me back.. > > > > Learning C and probably C++ and maybe some Assembly is good. > > > > After that, you might want to absorb the McKusic books: 'Design and > > Implementaiton of the (4.3 and) 4.4 BSD Operating System. > > Actually, McKusic's 'Design and Implementaion of the FreeBSD Operating > System' might be more useful. It's based on FBSD 5.2, but it's still > more up to date. Yes, I forgot he had a newer one out now. ////jerry > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 15:42:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50B4016A46B for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:42:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rafael.carre@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2062313C465 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:42:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rafael.carre@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so801625fgg.35 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:42:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:sender; bh=kTpDuJA1hfDhJtKv3QpJIkusvwEP5gOryPcM21TG4d0=; b=P4wYrH4aVI/LP/+uPyiJEKxj9EA2ftbxO05nbz+X5uFAE1NBbiNuZa+dXHUFj7mbVH3K4g4l3vu/3slP32CaN4JFV1eZIn6yS/rkHPNv7kHzEdnzfQoochXGNQSFoiZEGjZOUX0Zz5CENwJ156AuZ2htnQ4xK168jSDnxdrtjsc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:sender; b=cg8E/UQ/lhC/g0yKEMH/iAeFNIA7xRJUDZprlG1UnwocaS+1hi8apDPIuk/3Z4Io2N9i3Spmg2kqt8Srx/9rCHNhftBicP+VwYxJnreog4wraL4xvafUH1oAJkmRwKvR6UtqgB41/2yeMqDc0lbvsljIGtqfWb3SBzO3M7D0XOw= Received: by 10.86.1.1 with SMTP id 1mr2018972fga.2.1200582832538; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:13:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from zod.zod ( [138.195.130.70]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 4sm2515211fge.3.2008.01.17.07.13.50 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:13:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:13:29 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcOrbCBDYXJyw6k=?= To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080117161329.69fe4135@zod.zod> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/E.JkcNTlRDC02h.7oneId8g"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Sender: =?ISO-8859-1?B?UmFmYetsIENhcnLp?= Cc: Subject: Some UTF-8 characters are not representable on FreeBSD7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:42:31 -0000 --Sig_/E.JkcNTlRDC02h.7oneId8g Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, I noticed I couldn't use some characters with libncursesw: namely =E2=9A=91= =E2=9A=90 and =E2=8F=8F. I run into some tests and found that some characters were reported as unprintable, while on Linux all was fine. I found it extremely strange since those characters would show up in my terminal (gnome-terminal) when I pasted them. Here are the results of the test I ran on Linux and FreeBSD: [fun@zod ~]% uname -a ;./test FreeBSD zod 7.0-BETA3 FreeBSD 7.0-BETA3 #0: Sun Dec 2 02:30:18 CET 2007 root@zod:/media/externe/usr/src/sys/ZOD i386 Locale: fr_FR.UTF-8 OK a : 1=20 OK =E2=9A=91 : 0 OK =C3=B6 : 1 OK =E2=86=91 : 1 OK =C2=A9 : 1 OK =E2=9A=90 : 0 OK =C3=A9 : 1 OK =E2=8F=8F : 0 [fun@zod ~]% uname -a ; LANG=3Dfr_FR.ISO8859-15 ./test FreeBSD zod 7.0-BETA3 FreeBSD 7.0-BETA3 #0: Sun Dec 2 02:30:18 CET 2007 root@zod:/media/externe/usr/src/sys/ZOD i386 Locale: fr_FR.ISO8859-15 OK a : 1 OK =E2=9A=91 : 1 OK =C3=B6 : 1 OK =E2=86=91 : 1 OK =C2=A9 : 1 OK =E2=9A=90 : 1 OK =C3=A9 : 1 OK =E2=8F=8F : 1 16:03 funman@altair ~% uname -a ; ./test=20 Linux altair 2.6.22-2-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Aug 30 23:43:59 UTC 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux Locale: fr_FR.UTF-8 OK a : 32768 OK =E2=9A=91 : 1 OK =C3=B6 : 1 OK =E2=86=91 : 1 OK =C2=A9 : 1 OK =E2=9A=90 : 1 OK =C3=A9 : 1 OK =E2=8F=8F : 1 A value of 0 means unprintable, a positive value means printable (there is a graphical representation). And here is the test I used: #include #include #include #include int main(void) { printf( "Locale: %s\n", setlocale( LC_ALL, getenv( "LANG" ) ) ); #define MAX 8 const char const tab[MAX][6] =3D { "a", "=E2=9A=91", "=C3=B6", "=E2=86=91", "=C2=A9", "=E2=9A=90", "= =C3=A9", "=E2=8F=8F" }; int i; wchar_t wc; for( i =3D 0; i < MAX; i++ ) { printf("%s ", mbtowc( &wc, tab[i], 6 ) ? "OK" : "KO" ); printf("%s : %d\n", tab[i], iswgraph( wc ) ); } return 0; } I suppose this is a bug in UTF-8 locale, I tested with different $LANG finished by "UTF-8" and the result was the same. Am I right that an Unicode character should always have a graphical representation in an UTF-8 locale ? Thanks --=20 Rafa=C3=ABl Carr=C3=A9 --Sig_/E.JkcNTlRDC02h.7oneId8g Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHj3CcYWCeGMCv8Q8RAhTGAKCvuh60BrgBl8fQHEWgg+LFmj+fAACgzBaH 614hND+LTvD6IrwtSVH3Xtc= =RJlK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/E.JkcNTlRDC02h.7oneId8g-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 15:44:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47DC416A41B for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:44:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D89913C458 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:44:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m0HFgSmf093697; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:42:28 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m0HFgSca093696; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:42:28 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:42:28 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Eric LaVoie Message-ID: <20080117154227.GD93480@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <160593.63098.qm@web45105.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <160593.63098.qm@web45105.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: external hard drive for mobile pc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:44:48 -0000 On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 07:55:20PM -0800, Eric LaVoie wrote: > Will FreeBSD work if I install it on an external hard drive, connected to a mobile PC via USB or FireWire, as a partition ( the two partitions being the mobile PC's internal Hardrive and this external hard drive which I am asking about.)? > If the answer is yes: can you provide me with links to some documentation covering how I would create the partition on the external hard drive ( this partition would cover as much of this drive as possible with the internal one being used for Windows Vista.); and how I can burn bootable DVD-RWs from the .iso image files of FreeBSD which I downloaded from your site? > Thank-you for your time, > Eric Well, I have an external USB drive on my deskside machine and I don't see how it should be different for a mobile one, except you might not want to always carry the external drive with you. So, you will want to 'noauto' it in fstab, so it doesn't always try to mount it at boot time. Then you can mount it manually when you need it. You will most likely have to have it plugged in at boot time if you want to use it so the system knows to make a device for it. The process of creating slices and partitions/filesystems on an external drive are exactly the same as doing it on an internal drive. You should be able to use either fdisk/bsdlabel/newfs or have sysinstall do it for you. I had some trouble because the drive I had was larger than the slice size limit those things would handle on V 6.1 which I was using on that machine then. So, I had to use gparted to create 3 slices. Then I was able to do it in a standard manner - just as described in the handbook for adding drives and in numerous posts to the list - I have made several - and some FAQs in online publications. So, just a little searching for adding a disk will get you what you need. Remember, that in FreeBSD, primary divisions of the disk are called 'slices' and slices can be subdivided in to 'partitions'. Microsloth mangles those so that primary divisions are called primary partitions and subdivisions are called extended partitions but their extended partitions are not compatible with UNIX, although there are UNIX ways of talking to them. ////jerry > __________________________________________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 15:45:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA41D16A420 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:45:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from netslists@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.152]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C47213C45D for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:45:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from netslists@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so802829fgg.35 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:45:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Qkte+mghmfQWy8I7+CLIw0Rus6CTNRE1RvcpEEpWHoo=; b=fHUzsH/SLswLBIOoSN5Unvwiz7vvge/d0dD2Lo9yv0cRqsZ+LWRq9QiUG5zzBtatxZNnu9vwdMoFan5crZ96MefEvfC7+yoQCfvGmaUdxzBklLDD0iRFgQACNt1EbIkyCRWhaN3+dASDz5Nwid8hC/JxjhHRnyCFPEgM3EfIcm0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=SIGPwNy9CNYbrbZ61wPFzp7inioW+wRm3S39sipr9r5ilTfzMf4fBs8XAN3kaO4elR7fPXTiLGJXh5LbAwS+Mo0vTUE7eCOpSN4pvTrlwJyx8q+PbC2HCtWqRY8IyYDJYHAaOD3SEtGD97KzjdGlupMycAN4kiDG/nIMnAt3/wo= Received: by 10.86.99.9 with SMTP id w9mr2038354fgb.22.1200584745543; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:45:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.9.8? ( [91.135.49.10]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 4sm2544915fge.3.2008.01.17.07.45.43 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:45:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <478F7825.4030107@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:45:41 +0100 From: Sten Daniel Soersdal User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wojciech Puchar References: <20080113175319.K1468@border.lukas.is-a-geek.org> <20080114074736.L1166@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <33530618.20080114175618@bk.ru> <20080114170016.N2442@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20080114170016.N2442@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Michael Lednev , Christian Baer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RAID mirror really worked X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:45:47 -0000 Wojciech Puchar wrote: >>>> gmirror works too very good without any hardware :) >> >> CB> Yes, but a hardware RAID works without the OS having to know about >> it. :-) >> >> ...and its failures? ;) >> > :) > > for mirroring there is almost no CPU overhead so buying extra hardware > doesn't make sense at all. not mentioning that most of such hardware are > actually normal disk controllers with extra soft in BIOS. these are > supported by ataraid driver. > > > much better is to use gmirror so it will be completely portable. > > and - with gmirror you DO NOT have to mirror/stripe/concat whole drives. > and that's what i do most often - mirror important data but store > unimportant data without it. ... But with a raid controller mirror you do not have to send the data twice over the host bus. gmirror is awesome -- Sten Daniel Soersdal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 16:49:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FAB816A418 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:49:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from viefep32-int.chello.at (viefep32-int.chello.at [62.179.121.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9934313C468 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:49:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from [192.168.1.103] (really [80.99.119.201]) by viefep32-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.08.02.02 201-2186-121-104-20070414) with ESMTP id <20080117164955.GMJR10429.viefep32-int.chello.at@[192.168.1.103]>; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:49:55 +0100 Message-ID: <478F8732.4040208@shopzeus.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:49:54 +0100 From: Laszlo Nagy User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Bertrand References: <478F64CF.7000603@shopzeus.com> <478F7142.8040506@ibctech.ca> <478F731B.5050201@shopzeus.com> In-Reply-To: <478F731B.5050201@shopzeus.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: routing question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:49:58 -0000 >> - ping from pc on 0.0 network to 192.168.2.138 >> > Well, I cannot do this from here. Those computers are X terminals, > they do not run inetd nor sshd. I cannot login from here and I cannot > leave now, but I can do it later if necessary. > >> - sysctl -a net.inet.ip.forwarding (on the GatewayComp) >> > cassiopeia# sysctl -a net.inet.ip.forwarding > net.inet.ip.forwarding: 1 > cassiopeia# > > > I can answer the missed question in about an hour. I'm sorry, not today. I'll try tomorrow. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 17:00:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09DA216A418 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:00:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from mx1.highperformance.net (dsl081-163-122.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.163.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E940513C442 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:00:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from w16.stradamotorsports.com (w16.stradamotorsports.com [192.168.1.16]) by mx1.highperformance.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0HGxfvt046471; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:59:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Message-ID: <478F8980.1090301@highperformance.net> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:59:44 -0800 From: "Jason C. Wells" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marc Silver References: <478F0D5A.9090107@highperformance.net> <20080117081414.GB12470@draenor.org> <478F1049.3000706@boosten.org> <20080117083837.GC12470@draenor.org> <20080117094332.K1563@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080117090210.GD12470@draenor.org> In-Reply-To: <20080117090210.GD12470@draenor.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=2.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_05 autolearn=failed version=3.1.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.6 (2006-10-03) on s4.stradamotorsports.com Cc: Wojciech Puchar , freebsd general questions , Peter Boosten Subject: Re: Gutman Method on Empty Space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:00:45 -0000 Marc Silver wrote: > Obviously it all comes down to how important the data is that you're > removing, but a single write is not enough if the data needs to be > disposed of 'securely'. Yep. The magnetic media retains a trace of everything that was recorded on it. If you have recorded over an old cassette tape, you may still be able to discern the original recording under the new recording. Gutmann method might be excessive but any software that uses it shows a seriousness about security. Plus I don't have to do all that writing. The computer does it for me. Wipe looks like a good start. Thanks for the tip. Later, Jason From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 17:12:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C6716A420 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:12:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5323A13C47E for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:12:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0HH7dSE004613; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:07:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0HH7PVl004610; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:07:28 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:07:25 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Sten Daniel Soersdal In-Reply-To: <478F7825.4030107@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080117180635.X4606@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20080113175319.K1468@border.lukas.is-a-geek.org> <20080114074736.L1166@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <33530618.20080114175618@bk.ru> <20080114170016.N2442@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <478F7825.4030107@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Michael Lednev , Christian Baer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RAID mirror really worked X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:12:39 -0000 > > ... But with a raid controller mirror you do not have to send the data twice > over the host bus. please reread what i said. most todays "RAID" controllers are actually normal controllers with BIOS with software support. these are supported with ataraid. there is nothing done by "hardware" > > gmirror is awesome > > -- > Sten Daniel Soersdal > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 17:27:18 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4434E16A468 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:27:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jacks@sage-american.com) Received: from mail.sagedata.net (mail.sagedata.net [63.214.156.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 453BA13C465 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:27:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jacks@sage-american.com) Received: from sagesuper (sageweb.net [65.68.247.73]) by mail.sagedata.net (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id m0HGxw67063369 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:59:58 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from jacks@sage-american.com) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.sagedata.net: Host sageweb.net [65.68.247.73] claimed to be sagesuper Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.20080117110046.011eee60@sage-american.com> X-Sender: jacks@sage-american.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (32) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:00:46 -0600 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Jack L. Stone" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Scanned-By: milter-spamc/1.13.385 (mail.sagedata.net [63.214.156.21]); Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:59:58 -0600 X-Scanned-By: milter-sender/1.16.915 (mail.sagedata.net [63.214.156.21]); Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:59:58 -0600 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92/5491/Thu Jan 17 09:13:54 2008 on mail.sagedata.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: NO, hits=-15.00 required=4.90 X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-15.0 points, 4.9 required) | | pts rule name description | ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- | -15 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP | Subject: MySQL Library upgrade issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:27:18 -0000 Am running FBSD-6.2p10 Recently, I upgraded MySQL-4.1.22 to 5.0.x and while things seem to work okay, I keep getting this warning in phpMyAdmin: "Your PHP MySQL library version 4.1.22 differs from your MySQL server version 5.0.51. This may cause unpredictable behavior." Perhaps my manner of jumping the versions of MySQL...?? How do I get it to recognize the proper library version? Thanks for any help. (^_^) Happy trails, Jack L. Stone System Admin Sage-american From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 17:22:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6E416A41A; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:22:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06DAB13C46A; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:22:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from phobos.samsco.home (phobos.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0HHAAAv001430; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:10:10 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <478F8BF2.4070700@samsco.org> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:10:10 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071128 SeaMonkey/1.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rick Macklem References: <18CC5A4A2AC36D7FF57615EE@ganymede.hub.org> <478AF6BC.8050604@highperformance.net> <20080114142124.Y55696@fledge.watson.org> <876FB8E38251C27B14CCCA29@atlantis.pc.cs.cmu.edu> <20080116203521.K15541@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]); Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:10:10 -0700 (MST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.4 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on pooker.samsco.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:39:37 +0000 Cc: rra@stanford.edu, port-freebsd@openafs.org, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Robert Watson , matt@linuxbox.com, freebsd-afs@freebsd.org, "Jason C. Wells" , openafs-devel@openafs.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Jeffrey Hutzelman Subject: Re: VFS KPI was Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Re: AFS ... or equivalent ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:22:19 -0000 Rick Macklem wrote: > > > On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Robert Watson wrote: > > [good stuff snipped] >> >> Right now we maintain a relatively stable VM/VFS KPI withing a major >> release (i.e, FreeBSD 6.0 -> 6.1 -> 6.2 -> 6.3), but see fairly >> significant changes between major releases (5.x -> 6.x -> 7.x, etc). >> I expect to see further changes in VFS for 8.x (and some of the >> locking-related ones have already started going in). >> > This is loosely related to both the OpenAFS thread and the Mac OS X ZFS > port thread, so I thought I'd ask... > > Has anyone considered trying to bring the FreeBSD VFS KPI (and others, for > that matter) closed to the Darwin/Mac OS X ones? The Apple folks made > quite dramatic changes to their VFS when going from Panther (very FreeBSD > like) to Tiger, but seemed to have stabilized, at least for Leopard. It > just seems that using the Mac OS X KPIs might leverage some work being > done on both sides? (I don't know if there is an OpenAFS port to Mac OS X > or interest in one, but I would think there would be a use for one, if it > existed?) > > Although I'm far from an expert on the Mac OS X VFS (when I ported to it, > I just cribbed the code and it worked:-), it seems that they pretty well > got rid of the concept of a vnode-lock. If the underlying file system > isn't SMP safe, it can put a lock on the subsystem at the VFS call. > (I think it optionally does a global lock or a uses an smp lock in the > vnode, but don't quote me on this. My code currently runs with the > thread-safe flag false in the vfs_conf structure entry, which enables > the automagic locking.) > Both Solaris and OSX seem to have found the path out of the VFS locking woods, and it would indeed be really nice if FreeBSD could follow suit. You're not the first to suggest the vnode locking move out of VFS and into the filesystems. I think that the work it would take to adapt the existing filesystems to this design would be far less than the ongoing work by everyone to fight the old design (both in FreeBSD proper and in companies that do their own custom filesystems in FreeBSD), but it does come at a cost of making things like nullfs much harder, if not nearly impossible. I wish I had time to work on something like this, but I encourage others to look into it and experiment. Scott From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 17:47:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CD0916A421 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:47:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pprocacci@datapipe.com) Received: from fmailhost04.isp.att.net (fmailhost04.isp.att.net [204.127.217.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E3613C4E7 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:47:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pprocacci@datapipe.com) Received: from nat.myhome.net (adsl-157-36-209.bna.bellsouth.net[70.157.36.209]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc04) with SMTP id <20080117174754H0400a8fvpe>; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:47:54 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [70.157.36.209] Received: (qmail 23155 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2008 17:48:17 -0000 Received: from 2.21.5.10.in-addr.arpa (10.5.21.2) by 1.21.5.10.in-addr.arpa with QMQP; 17 Jan 2008 17:48:17 -0000 Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:48:11 -0600 From: Paul Procacci To: "Jack L. Stone" Message-ID: <20080117174810.GA86225@procacci.kicks-ass.org> References: <3.0.1.32.20080117110046.011eee60@sage-american.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3.0.1.32.20080117110046.011eee60@sage-american.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MySQL Library upgrade issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:47:55 -0000 On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 11:00:46AM -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote: > Am running FBSD-6.2p10 > > Recently, I upgraded MySQL-4.1.22 to 5.0.x and while things seem to work > okay, I keep getting this warning in phpMyAdmin: > > "Your PHP MySQL library version 4.1.22 differs from your MySQL server > version 5.0.51. This may cause unpredictable behavior." > > Perhaps my manner of jumping the versions of MySQL...?? > > How do I get it to recognize the proper library version? > > Thanks for any help. The error stems from php5-mysql (or php4-mysql) being compiled against a different set of mysql libs. The easiest method for silencing the error is to recompile the php5-mysql (or php4-mysql) port. /usr/ports/databases/php5-mysql Cheers. > (^_^) > Happy trails, > Jack L. Stone > > System Admin > Sage-american > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Paul Procacci Manager, UNIX Support DataPipe Managed Global IT Services pprocacci@datapipe.com 1.201.792.4847 (international) 1.888.749.5821 (toll free) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 18:51:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 724D616A469 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:51:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hakmi@rogers.com) Received: from smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F80313C468 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:51:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hakmi@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 57705 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2008 18:24:35 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:X-MimeOLE; b=6BtarzJMyvE8RhqyOxLKUnrP4o8l9tEWeBq1fppFDvfzwBqx80D0tWpWYWVyuDTdaMc2D4O48KqCgUuGW/VGTxqL+pgBLvoGbRTx1j/YMnpPAFYz6SJIzXqMXfATPOewAPF8hro6zumBAfMnkHb7/j5vYevrv7MRZ51bwD9Q2c4= ; Received: from unknown (HELO tamouh) (hakmi@rogers.com@99.224.65.182 with login) by smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2008 18:24:35 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: y6.PwmsVM1kq4q9UIge2R9qRKqRZksU2sH_ct0CfWyZ3Z20eLhkhopApkrCQlm1IZg-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: "Tamouh H." To: Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:22:32 -0500 Message-ID: <0d1801c85935$ed607700$6900a8c0@tamouh> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AchZNez1gprhbQxnQ1WHvM9x5mw4Fg== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Cc: Subject: Support for Intel RAID X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:51:16 -0000 Hello, Anyone know if Intel 5000V chipset with ESB2 SATA 3.0 onboard RAID is = supported on FreeBSD 6.2/6.3/7 ? Last time I've checked on 6.1 it didn't work in RAID mode. Thanks, Tamouh Hakmi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 19:15:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3029716A420 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:15:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from njt@ayvali.org) Received: from starfish.geekisp.com (mail.geekisp.com [216.168.135.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968B113C457 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:15:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from njt@ayvali.org) Received: (qmail 15010 invoked by uid 1003); 17 Jan 2008 19:16:47 -0000 Received: from clam.int.geekisp.com (HELO clam.geekisp.com) (192.168.4.38) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 17 Jan 2008 19:16:47 -0000 Received: from clam.geekisp.com (njt@localhost.geekisp.com [127.0.0.1]) by clam.geekisp.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m0HJFjCI025309 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:15:45 -0500 (EST) Received: (from njt@localhost) by clam.geekisp.com (8.14.0/8.14.0/Submit) id m0HJFjsi028297 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:15:45 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: clam.geekisp.com: njt set sender to njt@ayvali.org using -f Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:15:45 -0500 From: "N.J. Thomas" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080117191545.GC9286@ayvali.org> References: <20080117010329.GD6007@ayvali.org> <20080117012511.GA74669@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080117012511.GA74669@owl.midgard.homeip.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Subject: Re: lockfile -- posix compliant? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:15:47 -0000 * Erik Trulsson [2008-01-17 02:25:11+0100]: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 08:03:29PM -0500, N.J. Thomas wrote: > > Can someone tell me if lockfile(1) is a POSIX-defined utility? > > Considering that lockfile(1) is usually installed as part of procmail Ah, gotcha. Coincidently, the RHEL 5, OpenBSD 4.1, and FreeBSD 6.2 boxes that I tested it on all happened to have procmail installed and I assumed that lockfile(1) was a POSIX util. Thanks for the heads up. Thomas -- N.J. Thomas njt@ayvali.org Etiamsi occiderit me, in ipso sperabo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 19:40:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F56E16A419 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:40:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shulbert@toolwire.com) Received: from smtp1.toolwire.com (smtp1.toolwire.com [206.132.208.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C5EE13C44B for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:40:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shulbert@toolwire.com) Received: from ginger.toolwire.com (unknown [10.2.0.40]) by smtp1.toolwire.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 110034801C for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:09:48 -0800 (PST) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:08:25 -0800 Message-ID: <133A1C67A2D4284A91A113F4D951E8DA2E3BF6@ginger.toolwire.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: FreeBSD Stable Thread-Index: AchZPFWyi9mJd7wHRLKyl6wsWC/xzw== X-Priority: 1 Priority: Urgent Importance: high From: "Sean Hulbert" To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: FreeBSD Stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:40:51 -0000 Hello =20 I am trying to download FreeBSD stable. All I get is a cvsups file. I need to download the ISO to my winbox = then burn it to CD. =20 Is there a program or link to the direct ISO that will allow me to = download it. =20 Thank You Sean Hulbert Work Ph: 925.227.8500 x136 Cell Email: shulbert@vtext.com Cell: 209.814.2276 AIM: Navbase1 Yahoo: Ghosthunter007 www.toolwire.com =20 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication with its contents may contain = confidential and/or legally privileged information. It is solely for the = use of the intended recipient(s). Unauthorized interception, review, use = or disclosure is prohibited and may violate applicable laws including = the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If you are not the intended = recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of the = communication. =20 igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum!!! =20 Epitoma Rei Militaris =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 19:47:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 789CF16A417 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:47:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 831A613C46E for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:47:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay11.apple.com (relay11.apple.com [17.128.113.48]) by mail-out3.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C22E81E5D13E; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:47:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay11.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay11.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id A4F5C28080; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:47:25 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 11807130-a443abb0000028a7-3f-478fb0cdcc6e Received: from cswiger1.apple.com (cswiger1.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay11.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 91C5F28081; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:47:25 -0800 (PST) From: Chuck Swiger To: Sean Hulbert In-Reply-To: <133A1C67A2D4284A91A113F4D951E8DA2E3BF6@ginger.toolwire.com> X-Priority: 1 References: <133A1C67A2D4284A91A113F4D951E8DA2E3BF6@ginger.toolwire.com> Message-Id: <4CC1F8A0-F415-4DD9-8AB4-9D19F45F8B19@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:47:24 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:47:27 -0000 On Jan 17, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Sean Hulbert wrote: > I am trying to download FreeBSD stable. > All I get is a cvsups file. I need to download the ISO to my winbox > then burn it to CD. > > Is there a program or link to the direct ISO that will allow me to > download it. See http://www.freebsd.org/where.html ...right now, the following is the 32-bit x86 version of 6-STABLE that is probably going to become 6.3-RELEASE shortly: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/6.3/ Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 20:41:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49C8616A41A for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:41:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philippe@nenert.net) Received: from slow1-v.mail.gandi.net (slow1-v.mail.gandi.net [217.70.178.88]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD5E13C4D1 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:41:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philippe@nenert.net) Received: from relay3-v.mail.gandi.net (relay3-v.mail.gandi.net [217.70.178.77]) by slow1-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C85A688CE1 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:28:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (mfilter5-v.gandi.net [217.70.178.39]) by relay3-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC30EBA13 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:28:01 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter5-v.mgt.gandi.net Received: from relay3-v.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.77]) by localhost (mfilter5-v.gandi.net [217.70.178.39]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wNb2WGn9ghRG for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:20:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.7] (dyn-83-156-220-76.ppp.tiscali.fr [83.156.220.76]) by relay3-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48828BA18 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:27:50 +0100 (CET) From: Philippe Nenert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:27:48 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801172127.48945.philippe@nenert.net> Subject: FreeBSD CDs don't boot with my Sony Vaio BGN-BX397XP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:41:02 -0000 Hello, I'have a Sony Vaio BGN-BX397XP. I'have Windows XP and Mandriva installed, but I want use FreeBSD. I cant boot with any CD, the system displays rapidly lines on the screen incomprehensible, I have a picture for that. I'have test 6.2, 6.3 and 7.0 beta 4 CDs You can see on back the model SONY PCG-9X1M. You can have a description of my computer on Sony web site : http://support.vaio.sony.co.uk/login/login.asp?site=voe_en_GB_cons Product Code : 28245051 Serial Number : 5000578 Thank you for your ideas, Philippe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 20:43:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B3B16A41B for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:43:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@webtent.net) Received: from esmtp.webtent.net (esmtp.webtent.net [208.38.145.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2244113C447 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:43:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@webtent.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by esmtp.webtent.net (WebTent ESMTP Postfix Internet Mail Gateway) with ESMTP id 3F46D7FF18 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:43:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from esmtp.webtent.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.webtent.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 46969-01 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:43:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from [70.110.70.43] (columbus.webtent.org [70.110.70.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by esmtp.webtent.net (WebTent ESMTP Postfix Internet Mail Gateway) with ESMTP id 47F547FD91 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:43:27 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Fitzpatrick To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain Organization: WebTent Networking, Inc. Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:43:26 -0500 Message-Id: <1200602606.7281.48.camel@columbus.webtent.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: WebTent Mailguard 1.0.2a Subject: db performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: robert@webtent.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:43:48 -0000 We have several postfix transport gateways on different networks all working with local amavisd-maia+SA using a remote postgresql backend at one location. I am getting delays in the queues on a gateway server at a remote site since we added more memory to the db server. After seeing the issues of "SA TIMED OUT" in the logs, seems this was happening prior to the upgrade, but never to the extent, I guess, to delay much mail. Queues on a gateway of the same network as the db server working fine, but messages with the timeouts differ from one server to another. After reading tuning, it suggests the SWAP should be double RAM. According to dmesg... real memory = 3220635648 (3071 MB) avail memory = 3150565376 (3004 MB) we have 3GB of RAM available with actually 4GB physical RAM installed? Anyway, the SWAP is only 2GB, even with the average usage shown here, will increasing SWAP to 6-8GB help? last pid: 49828; load averages: 0.23, 0.21, 0.18 up 8+18:33:08 15:42:23 184 processes: 5 running, 158 sleeping, 21 waiting CPU states: 2.6% user, 0.0% nice, 1.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 96.4% idle Mem: 446M Active, 1646M Inact, 236M Wired, 138M Cache, 112M Buf, 30M Free Swap: 2048M Total, 164K Used, 2048M Free I also have assumed in the past that db performance could be better if I get off the system RAID-5 and put it on 1+0? The system has 4 SATA drives. All servers running FreeBSD 6.2 and latest ports of postfix+amavisd-maia +SA+ClamAV. Thanks for any input. -- Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 20:44:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24E816A418 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:44:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from per-olof.nilsson2@comhem.se) Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84ACF13C4EB for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:44:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from per-olof.nilsson2@comhem.se) Received: from c83-249-36-53.bredband.comhem.se ([83.249.36.53]:52276) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JFbb2-0006Kj-6v for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:44:20 +0100 From: tesolarisc To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1200548971.2924.14.camel@zeus.se> References: <1200548971.2924.14.camel@zeus.se> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-X5EslqhUVD5RWqj4cO0O" Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:44:40 +0100 Message-Id: <1200602680.5058.6.camel@zeus.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Originating-IP: 83.249.36.53 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1JFbb2-0006Kj-6v. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1JFbb2-0006Kj-6v 638e5602334e20b998ea87bab87d4814 Subject: Re: recomendations for webb shop software X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:44:21 -0000 --=-X5EslqhUVD5RWqj4cO0O Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable nice solution found, thx anyway. >=20 --=20 /Peo ---------------------------------------------- - PGP signed/encrypted emails is prefered -=20 ---------------------------------------------- =20 [novice about this? ~> visit: www.gnupg.org] --=-X5EslqhUVD5RWqj4cO0O Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkePvjQACgkQgWSfflYlIbwjtACgpe70Q2s+mpSbI9MyizUDPSJF agEAn0ZKbNj+cDACt5y0RVwrYQHo1AXj =mbL5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-X5EslqhUVD5RWqj4cO0O-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 20:53:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 935AE16A418 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:53:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84EAF13C4EC for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:53:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36596EBC3B; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:53:37 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:53:36 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: robert@webtent.com Message-Id: <20080117155336.0c38d86d.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <1200602606.7281.48.camel@columbus.webtent.org> References: <1200602606.7281.48.camel@columbus.webtent.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Robert Fitzpatrick , FreeBSD Subject: Re: db performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:53:38 -0000 In response to Robert Fitzpatrick : > We have several postfix transport gateways on different networks all > working with local amavisd-maia+SA using a remote postgresql backend at > one location. I am getting delays in the queues on a gateway server at a > remote site since we added more memory to the db server. After seeing > the issues of "SA TIMED OUT" in the logs, seems this was happening prior > to the upgrade, but never to the extent, I guess, to delay much mail. > Queues on a gateway of the same network as the db server working fine, > but messages with the timeouts differ from one server to another. > > After reading tuning, it suggests the SWAP should be double RAM. > According to dmesg... > > real memory = 3220635648 (3071 MB) > avail memory = 3150565376 (3004 MB) > > we have 3GB of RAM available with actually 4GB physical RAM installed? > Anyway, the SWAP is only 2GB, even with the average usage shown here, > will increasing SWAP to 6-8GB help? > > last pid: 49828; load averages: 0.23, 0.21, 0.18 up 8+18:33:08 15:42:23 > 184 processes: 5 running, 158 sleeping, 21 waiting > CPU states: 2.6% user, 0.0% nice, 1.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 96.4% idle > Mem: 446M Active, 1646M Inact, 236M Wired, 138M Cache, 112M Buf, 30M Free > Swap: 2048M Total, 164K Used, 2048M Free Adding swap is unlikely to help you, as you're not really using much memory. > I also have assumed in the past that db performance could be better if I > get off the system RAID-5 and put it on 1+0? The system has 4 SATA > drives. That will speed things up if IO is your bottleneck, but you've not demonstrated that. Which machine in this system is the bottleneck? Are the Amavis machines timing out, or is the PostgreSQL server too slow? If I understand your description, it sounds like a network problem to me ... i.e., machines not on the same gateway as the PG server are experience slow network response (or dropped packets?) that's causing amavis to time out while trying to talk to PG. I would suggest investigating there first. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 19:52:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5875316A507; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:52:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) Received: from ccshst09.cs.uoguelph.ca (ccshst09.cs.uoguelph.ca [131.104.94.206]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F08C13C474; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:52:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) Received: from muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca (muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca [131.104.91.102]) by ccshst09.cs.uoguelph.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m0HGZofS012317; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:35:50 -0500 Received: from localhost (rmacklem@localhost) by muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca (8.11.7p3+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id m0HGcwT22995; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:38:58 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca: rmacklem owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:38:58 -0500 (EST) From: Rick Macklem X-X-Sender: rmacklem@muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca To: Robert Watson In-Reply-To: <20080116203521.K15541@fledge.watson.org> Message-ID: References: <18CC5A4A2AC36D7FF57615EE@ganymede.hub.org> <478AF6BC.8050604@highperformance.net> <20080114142124.Y55696@fledge.watson.org> <876FB8E38251C27B14CCCA29@atlantis.pc.cs.cmu.edu> <20080116203521.K15541@fledge.watson.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 131.104.94.206 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:02:13 +0000 Cc: rra@stanford.edu, port-freebsd@openafs.org, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, matt@linuxbox.com, freebsd-afs@freebsd.org, "Jason C. Wells" , openafs-devel@openafs.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Jeffrey Hutzelman Subject: VFS KPI was Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Re: AFS ... or equivalent ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:52:13 -0000 On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Robert Watson wrote: [good stuff snipped] > > Right now we maintain a relatively stable VM/VFS KPI withing a major release > (i.e, FreeBSD 6.0 -> 6.1 -> 6.2 -> 6.3), but see fairly significant changes > between major releases (5.x -> 6.x -> 7.x, etc). I expect to see further > changes in VFS for 8.x (and some of the locking-related ones have already > started going in). > This is loosely related to both the OpenAFS thread and the Mac OS X ZFS port thread, so I thought I'd ask... Has anyone considered trying to bring the FreeBSD VFS KPI (and others, for that matter) closed to the Darwin/Mac OS X ones? The Apple folks made quite dramatic changes to their VFS when going from Panther (very FreeBSD like) to Tiger, but seemed to have stabilized, at least for Leopard. It just seems that using the Mac OS X KPIs might leverage some work being done on both sides? (I don't know if there is an OpenAFS port to Mac OS X or interest in one, but I would think there would be a use for one, if it existed?) Although I'm far from an expert on the Mac OS X VFS (when I ported to it, I just cribbed the code and it worked:-), it seems that they pretty well got rid of the concept of a vnode-lock. If the underlying file system isn't SMP safe, it can put a lock on the subsystem at the VFS call. (I think it optionally does a global lock or a uses an smp lock in the vnode, but don't quote me on this. My code currently runs with the thread-safe flag false in the vfs_conf structure entry, which enables the automagic locking.) Just a thought, rick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 21:11:44 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FDFA16A41A for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:11:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@webtent.net) Received: from esmtp.webtent.net (esmtp.webtent.net [208.38.145.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8802113C457 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:11:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@webtent.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by esmtp.webtent.net (WebTent ESMTP Postfix Internet Mail Gateway) with ESMTP id B4BC77FDBC; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:11:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from esmtp.webtent.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.webtent.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 48333-06; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:09:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from [70.110.70.43] (columbus.webtent.org [70.110.70.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by esmtp.webtent.net (WebTent ESMTP Postfix Internet Mail Gateway) with ESMTP id A8A327FBB1; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:09:29 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Fitzpatrick To: Bill Moran In-Reply-To: <20080117155336.0c38d86d.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <1200602606.7281.48.camel@columbus.webtent.org> <20080117155336.0c38d86d.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: WebTent Networking, Inc. Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:09:28 -0500 Message-Id: <1200604168.7281.65.camel@columbus.webtent.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: WebTent Mailguard 1.0.2a Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: db performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: robert@webtent.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:11:44 -0000 On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 15:53 -0500, Bill Moran wrote: > In response to Robert Fitzpatrick : > > > I also have assumed in the past that db performance could be better if I > > get off the system RAID-5 and put it on 1+0? The system has 4 SATA > > drives. > > That will speed things up if IO is your bottleneck, but you've not > demonstrated that. > > Which machine in this system is the bottleneck? Are the Amavis machines > timing out, or is the PostgreSQL server too slow? If I understand your > description, it sounds like a network problem to me ... i.e., machines > not on the same gateway as the PG server are experience slow network > response (or dropped packets?) that's causing amavis to time out while > trying to talk to PG. I would suggest investigating there first. > The SA timeouts I'm finding on all the servers. Even the db server that runs it's own amavisd process for backup purposes and some minor domains just to make sure it is there and working. This is why I think you're right, the pgsql db is too slow. Would I possibly see dramatic differences in speed with the RAID switch? -- Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 21:19:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E71D16A41B for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:19:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084DF13C4CC for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:19:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JFc8u-0003xi-5f for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:19:20 +0000 Received: from 89-172-63-18.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([89.172.63.18]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:19:20 +0000 Received: from ivoras by 89-172-63-18.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:19:20 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:19:09 +0100 Lines: 32 Message-ID: References: <1200602606.7281.48.camel@columbus.webtent.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigB98D099BFD002DF2F082DD86" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 89-172-63-18.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) In-Reply-To: <1200602606.7281.48.camel@columbus.webtent.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Sender: news Subject: Re: db performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:19:26 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigB98D099BFD002DF2F082DD86 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > real memory =3D 3220635648 (3071 MB) > avail memory =3D 3150565376 (3004 MB) >=20 > we have 3GB of RAM available with actually 4GB physical RAM installed? If you're using a 32-bit (i386) kernel you need PAE. Or switch to 64-bit = (amd64). --------------enigB98D099BFD002DF2F082DD86 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHj8ZOldnAQVacBcgRAiodAJ92CVraq7hXV+d1k0evXDaUEMGyQgCgvx/t U83mSrGGfpvp5JX7yFKmQ/4= =/WGO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigB98D099BFD002DF2F082DD86-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 21:21:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EFBB16A418 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:21:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EB2713C457 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:21:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0HLHEOq005577; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:17:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0HLH9eq005574; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:17:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:17:09 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: robert@webtent.com In-Reply-To: <1200602606.7281.48.camel@columbus.webtent.org> Message-ID: <20080117221629.Y5573@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <1200602606.7281.48.camel@columbus.webtent.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: db performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:21:37 -0000 > After reading tuning, it suggests the SWAP should be double RAM. > According to dmesg... installing database on RAID-5 or asking if to add swap (when almost none is used)? what is more stupid? whould we vote? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 21:32:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB8F16A418 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:32:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@webtent.net) Received: from esmtp.webtent.net (esmtp.webtent.net [208.38.145.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2110813C459 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:32:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@webtent.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by esmtp.webtent.net (WebTent ESMTP Postfix Internet Mail Gateway) with ESMTP id 8135E7FE81; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:32:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from esmtp.webtent.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.webtent.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 49973-04; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:32:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from [70.110.70.43] (columbus.webtent.org [70.110.70.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by esmtp.webtent.net (WebTent ESMTP Postfix Internet Mail Gateway) with ESMTP id B68507FDB9; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:32:13 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Fitzpatrick To: Wojciech Puchar In-Reply-To: <20080117221629.Y5573@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <1200602606.7281.48.camel@columbus.webtent.org> <20080117221629.Y5573@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: WebTent Networking, Inc. Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:32:12 -0500 Message-Id: <1200605532.7281.74.camel@columbus.webtent.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: WebTent Mailguard 1.0.2a Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: db performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: robert@webtent.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:32:23 -0000 On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 22:17 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > After reading tuning, it suggests the SWAP should be double RAM. > > According to dmesg... > > installing database on RAID-5 or asking if to add swap (when almost none > is used)? what is more stupid? whould we vote? That was my whole point of showing you the low usage. I take that as a yes, RAID 1+0 would provide a dramatic difference in speed, thanks! -- Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 21:34:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EAD916A419 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:34:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EABF13C44B for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:34:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30CF2EBC3B; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:34:21 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:34:20 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: robert@webtent.com Message-Id: <20080117163420.ba23dc30.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <1200604168.7281.65.camel@columbus.webtent.org> References: <1200602606.7281.48.camel@columbus.webtent.org> <20080117155336.0c38d86d.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <1200604168.7281.65.camel@columbus.webtent.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Robert Fitzpatrick , FreeBSD Subject: Re: db performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:34:22 -0000 In response to Robert Fitzpatrick : > On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 15:53 -0500, Bill Moran wrote: > > In response to Robert Fitzpatrick : > > > > > I also have assumed in the past that db performance could be better if I > > > get off the system RAID-5 and put it on 1+0? The system has 4 SATA > > > drives. > > > > That will speed things up if IO is your bottleneck, but you've not > > demonstrated that. > > > > Which machine in this system is the bottleneck? Are the Amavis machines > > timing out, or is the PostgreSQL server too slow? If I understand your > > description, it sounds like a network problem to me ... i.e., machines > > not on the same gateway as the PG server are experience slow network > > response (or dropped packets?) that's causing amavis to time out while > > trying to talk to PG. I would suggest investigating there first. > > The SA timeouts I'm finding on all the servers. Even the db server that > runs it's own amavisd process for backup purposes and some minor domains > just to make sure it is there and working. This is why I think you're > right, the pgsql db is too slow. Would I possibly see dramatic > differences in speed with the RAID switch? You're not even close to proposing a solution yet. Take a deep breath and take a little time to understand the problem before you start throwing hardware at it. I don't know anything about amavisd's usage of databases. If it's doing a lot of small writes, then it's likely that getting off RAID 5 will make a marked difference. You need to investigate more, though. Otherwise you're just randomly flipping switches. Watching top on the PG machine, how much RAM is in use? What is the average CPU usage when you see timeouts? Run top -m io in another terminal and see if a lot of IO is happening on the part of PostgreSQL ... is it reads or writes? And what tuning have you done to PostgreSQL? PG doesn't perform well without tuning. Install the pg_buffercache addon and see if you've got enough shared_buffers to get decent performance out of it. Are you running vacuum and analyze frequently? Turn on query timing and watch the logs to see what queries are taking up time. Read the following links and follow the advice therein: http://www.powerpostgresql.com/PerfList http://www.revsys.com/writings/postgresql-performance.html -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 21:37:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5836516A417 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:37:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from giotissl@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38E7E13C458 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:37:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from giotissl@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so207193anc.13 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:37:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=55m7cwfV8KoBhI3zKFLmreId4z/2TnztyfIH6zYhbXQ=; b=JnJ0zxLxlRK03zveoEPVnMkxvQ/j50QglomH9GECAtOXYDibrijWetNGfZ10dT/0U9tDyxFIAXQjnHE3PlI6oqyesrlfNVEguuycXKcvoGagnIRoQ9BNx89BE4mX/tluJtIJ9PlfPnLa92+Z4B4L3fuqygSKStsESZ5RoHtdWFc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=ud1JXOiNsYLEPPnuUCSsIJC2Lg4HijNQcF3Us7MijSPoXCG+uDCRNbIJUJY781KsB8DqN27sZTMYLWzWGqZI5el+F1DvuiQxou9uY93rHosoOy2PZE0zsfjRq/9z8M3cnpcXV95OfRwZ1dewOoh9t5S863FC5FhdUQyt6iD3PcQ= Received: by 10.100.241.17 with SMTP id o17mr5323333anh.72.1200604284422; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:11:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.211.9 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:11:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <795c613b0801171311kc1edau2fe2f0bc6a131f6b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:11:24 +0200 From: "Giotis Eugen" To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: ftp setup - giotissl - ASAP - SOS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:37:06 -0000 hello, I just bought a dedicated server (unmanaged server) Can you help me? I want to install the ftp. Can you help me step by step ? I can connect to my server via SSH and I have installed the cpanel/whm. Please reply me as soon as if its possible. Thank you, GiotisSL From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 21:40:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7AF316A419 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:40:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@webtent.net) Received: from esmtp.webtent.net (esmtp.webtent.net [208.38.145.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA27813C45D for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:40:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@webtent.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by esmtp.webtent.net (WebTent ESMTP Postfix Internet Mail Gateway) with ESMTP id 962EF7FE78; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:40:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from esmtp.webtent.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.webtent.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 50756-01; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:40:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from [70.110.70.43] (columbus.webtent.org [70.110.70.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by esmtp.webtent.net (WebTent ESMTP Postfix Internet Mail Gateway) with ESMTP id 3F84F7FDE5; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:39:00 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Fitzpatrick To: Ivan Voras In-Reply-To: References: <1200602606.7281.48.camel@columbus.webtent.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: WebTent Networking, Inc. Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:38:57 -0500 Message-Id: <1200605937.7281.79.camel@columbus.webtent.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: WebTent Mailguard 1.0.2a Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: db performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: robert@webtent.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:40:39 -0000 On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 22:19 +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: > Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > > > real memory = 3220635648 (3071 MB) > > avail memory = 3150565376 (3004 MB) > > > > we have 3GB of RAM available with actually 4GB physical RAM installed? > > If you're using a 32-bit (i386) kernel you need PAE. Or switch to 64-bit > (amd64). Yes, this is something else I've found I need to do to these i386 servers since we upgraded the memory, I guess I'll get PAE in the kernel and switch the RAID, should provide quite a difference, yes? Some people have suggested the PAE drivers may not be stable with my hardware. -- Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 21:48:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66F1916A469 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:48:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5530513C469 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:48:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A99EEBC3B; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:48:15 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:48:14 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: robert@webtent.com Message-Id: <20080117164814.e1c7a086.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <1200605937.7281.79.camel@columbus.webtent.org> References: <1200602606.7281.48.camel@columbus.webtent.org> <1200605937.7281.79.camel@columbus.webtent.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Robert Fitzpatrick , Ivan Voras , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: db performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:48:16 -0000 In response to Robert Fitzpatrick : > On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 22:19 +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: > > Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > > > > > real memory = 3220635648 (3071 MB) > > > avail memory = 3150565376 (3004 MB) > > > > > > we have 3GB of RAM available with actually 4GB physical RAM installed? > > > > If you're using a 32-bit (i386) kernel you need PAE. Or switch to 64-bit > > (amd64). > > Yes, this is something else I've found I need to do to these i386 > servers since we upgraded the memory, I guess I'll get PAE in the kernel > and switch the RAID, should provide quite a difference, yes? Some people > have suggested the PAE drivers may not be stable with my hardware. I don't recommend PAE simply because amd64 works so well and PAE is a holdover hack. That being said, if your hardware is i386 only, you're stuck with PAE. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 21:53:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 646BA16A477 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:53:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E01C13C448 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:53:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0HLnTMO005636; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:49:29 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0HLnP8t005633; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:49:28 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:49:25 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: robert@webtent.com In-Reply-To: <1200605532.7281.74.camel@columbus.webtent.org> Message-ID: <20080117224645.D5606@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <1200602606.7281.48.camel@columbus.webtent.org> <20080117221629.Y5573@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <1200605532.7281.74.camel@columbus.webtent.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: db performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:53:57 -0000 >> is used)? what is more stupid? whould we vote? > > That was my whole point of showing you the low usage. I take that as a > yes, RAID 1+0 would provide a dramatic difference in speed, thanks! the only adventage of RAID-5 is less "wasted" space than RAID-1. one and the only adventage. write performance is terrible on small writes - exactly what happens on database usage. with today sizes of disks more "wasted" space doesn't make much a problem, as i don't think your database have hundreds of gigabytes. did you look how much disks (no matter what RAID or just devices) are actually used?! use systat From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 21:54:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7482A16A4C7 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:54:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@webtent.net) Received: from esmtp.webtent.net (esmtp.webtent.net [208.38.145.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B70B13C46E for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:54:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@webtent.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by esmtp.webtent.net (WebTent ESMTP Postfix Internet Mail Gateway) with ESMTP id B48737FE1A; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:54:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from esmtp.webtent.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.webtent.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 51272-05-2; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:53:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from [70.110.70.43] (columbus.webtent.org [70.110.70.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by esmtp.webtent.net (WebTent ESMTP Postfix Internet Mail Gateway) with ESMTP id 9CE227FE2C; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:52:51 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Fitzpatrick To: Bill Moran In-Reply-To: <20080117163420.ba23dc30.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <1200602606.7281.48.camel@columbus.webtent.org> <20080117155336.0c38d86d.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <1200604168.7281.65.camel@columbus.webtent.org> <20080117163420.ba23dc30.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: WebTent Networking, Inc. Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:52:46 -0500 Message-Id: <1200606767.7281.90.camel@columbus.webtent.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: WebTent Mailguard 1.0.2a Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: db performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: robert@webtent.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:54:02 -0000 On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 16:34 -0500, Bill Moran wrote: > In response to Robert Fitzpatrick : > I don't know anything about amavisd's usage of databases. If it's doing > a lot of small writes, then it's likely that getting off RAID 5 will make > a marked difference. I believe this is the case with SA learning on and auto-whitelisting. Disabling things like that are my last resort. > You need to investigate more, though. Otherwise you're just randomly > flipping switches. I really appreciate the pointers! > Watching top on the PG machine, how much RAM is in use? What is the > average CPU usage when you see timeouts? Run top -m io in another terminal > and see if a lot of IO is happening on the part of PostgreSQL ... is it > reads or writes? I see mainly postgres in the top 8-10 with mainly WRITEs of mainly less than 100 regularly, mostly less than 30 WRITES at a time. > > And what tuning have you done to PostgreSQL? PG doesn't perform well > without tuning. Install the pg_buffercache addon and see if you've got > enough shared_buffers to get decent performance out of it. Are you > running vacuum and analyze frequently? Turn on query timing and watch > the logs to see what queries are taking up time. > > Read the following links and follow the advice therein: > http://www.powerpostgresql.com/PerfList > http://www.revsys.com/writings/postgresql-performance.html > This is what I have setup now, thanks for the links, I'll re-check my tuning... mx1# cat /etc/sysctl.conf kern.ipc.shm_use_phys=1 kern.ipc.shmmax=1073741824 kern.ipc.shmall=262144 kern.ipc.semmsl=512 kern.ipc.semmap=256 I'm sure some of my tuning could use some help, like the shm_use_phys, maybe this is why my swap is not being used much? This is what I've changed from defaults in postgresql.conf... max_connections = 250 shared_buffers = 500MB work_mem = 64MB # min 64kB maintenance_work_mem = 256MB # min 1MB max_fsm_pages = 256000 -- Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 21:55:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D8AC16A476 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:55:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamesh@lanl.gov) Received: from mailwasher.lanl.gov (mailwasher.lanl.gov [204.121.3.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A22F13C4D9 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:55:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamesh@lanl.gov) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mailwasher.lanl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB71540497; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:55:28 -0700 (MST) X-CTN5-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mailwasher.lanl.gov Received: from mailwasher.lanl.gov (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mailwasher.lanl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A05E54061B; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:55:28 -0700 (MST) Received: from mailrelay2.lanl.gov (mailrelay2.lanl.gov [128.165.4.103]) by mailwasher.lanl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77CE5540497; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:55:28 -0700 (MST) Received: from oppie-mail.lanl.gov (oppie-mail.lanl.gov [128.165.4.123]) by mailrelay2.lanl.gov (8.13.8/8.13.8/(ccn-5)) with ESMTP id m0HLtSEr003514; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:55:28 -0700 Received: from [128.165.86.60] (p25dual1.lanl.gov [128.165.86.60]) by oppie-mail.lanl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95CAD1F8007; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:55:18 -0700 (MST) From: James Harrison To: Giotis Eugen In-Reply-To: <795c613b0801171311kc1edau2fe2f0bc6a131f6b@mail.gmail.com> References: <795c613b0801171311kc1edau2fe2f0bc6a131f6b@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Los Alamos National Labs Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:55:18 -0700 Message-Id: <1200606918.4510.12.camel@p25dual1.lanl.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.0 (2.8.0-33.0.1.el5) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CTN-5-MailScanner-Information: Please see http://network.lanl.gov/email/virus-scan.php X-CTN-5-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CTN-5-MailScanner-From: jamesh@lanl.gov X-Spam-Status: No Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ftp setup - giotissl - ASAP - SOS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jamesh@lanl.gov List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:55:29 -0000 On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 23:11 +0200, Giotis Eugen wrote: > hello, > I just bought a dedicated server (unmanaged server) > Can you help me? > I want to install the ftp. > Can you help me step by step ? > I can connect to my server via SSH and I have installed the cpanel/whm. > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-ftp.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 22:07:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19A6716A41A for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:07:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@webtent.net) Received: from esmtp.webtent.net (esmtp.webtent.net [208.38.145.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 107F913C442 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:07:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@webtent.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by esmtp.webtent.net (WebTent ESMTP Postfix Internet Mail Gateway) with ESMTP id 6D32F800A1; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:07:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from esmtp.webtent.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.webtent.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 52122-07-2; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:07:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from [70.110.70.43] (columbus.webtent.org [70.110.70.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by esmtp.webtent.net (WebTent ESMTP Postfix Internet Mail Gateway) with ESMTP id E95EB7FE43; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:07:04 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Fitzpatrick To: Wojciech Puchar In-Reply-To: <20080117224645.D5606@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <1200602606.7281.48.camel@columbus.webtent.org> <20080117221629.Y5573@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <1200605532.7281.74.camel@columbus.webtent.org> <20080117224645.D5606@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: WebTent Networking, Inc. Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:07:04 -0500 Message-Id: <1200607624.7281.95.camel@columbus.webtent.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: WebTent Mailguard 1.0.2a Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: db performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: robert@webtent.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:07:21 -0000 On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 22:49 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >> is used)? what is more stupid? whould we vote? > > > > That was my whole point of showing you the low usage. I take that as a > > yes, RAID 1+0 would provide a dramatic difference in speed, thanks! > > the only adventage of RAID-5 is less "wasted" space than RAID-1. one and > the only adventage. write performance is terrible on small writes - > exactly what happens on database usage. > > with today sizes of disks more "wasted" space doesn't make much a problem, > as i don't think your database have hundreds of gigabytes. > > did you look how much disks (no matter what RAID or just devices) are > actually used?! > > use systat Using 'systat -iostat' it shows mostly idle with 25-70 MB/s on the aacd0 array. Most of time above 50. Thanks for the help! -- Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 22:08:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB11416A420 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:08:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9079F13C4E5 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:08:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m0HM6OHw095346; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:06:24 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m0HM6Okg095345; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:06:24 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:06:24 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Wojciech Puchar Message-ID: <20080117220624.GA95312@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <1200602606.7281.48.camel@columbus.webtent.org> <20080117221629.Y5573@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080117221629.Y5573@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: robert@webtent.com, FreeBSD Subject: Re: db performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:08:45 -0000 On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:17:09PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >After reading tuning, it suggests the SWAP should be double RAM. > >According to dmesg... > > installing database on RAID-5 or asking if to add swap (when almost none > is used)? what is more stupid? whould we vote? That is not a very helpful response. ////jerry > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 22:24:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E72BD16A418 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:24:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brent.jones@otago.ac.nz) Received: from mailhub2.otago.ac.nz (mailhub2.otago.ac.nz [139.80.64.247]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A93E13C442 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:24:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brent.jones@otago.ac.nz) Received: from its-ex-p04.registry.otago.ac.nz (its-ex-p04.registry.otago.ac.nz [10.4.15.133]) by mailhub2.otago.ac.nz (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0HMORhb023479; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:24:28 +1300 Received: from its-ex-p04.registry.otago.ac.nz ([10.4.15.138]) by its-ex-p04.registry.otago.ac.nz with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:24:27 +1300 Received: from MAIL1.registry.otago.ac.nz ([10.4.15.129]) by its-ex-p04.registry.otago.ac.nz with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:24:27 +1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:24:27 +1300 Message-ID: <31AE442CCBC1094ABC40CE85B0149F0652370B@MAIL1.registry.otago.ac.nz> In-Reply-To: <478F0D5A.9090107@highperformance.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Gutman Method on Empty Space Thread-Index: AchY4HhOk9W3+Fq7TQGe4HoEL0pRsQAdc52w References: <478F0D5A.9090107@highperformance.net> From: "Brent Jones" To: "Jason C. Wells" , "freebsd general questions" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Jan 2008 22:24:27.0822 (UTC) FILETIME=[B8D78CE0:01C85957] X-PMX-Version: 5.4.0.320885, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.2.313940, Antispam-Data: 2008.1.17.141150 X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='BODY_SIZE_800_899 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __IMS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Cc: Subject: RE: Gutman Method on Empty Space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:24:31 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org=20 > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of=20 > Jason C. Wells > Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2008 9:10 p.m. > To: freebsd general questions > Subject: Gutman Method on Empty Space >=20 > Can anyone recommend a utility for the secure overwriting of=20 > unused disc=20 > space? split -b 200m /dev/random randomdata ; sync && rm randomdata* Run as many times as your paranoia factor requires on your file system. Gutman suggests in his own writings that overwriting with random data makes the most sense with modern disks. Run as root to extend the writes past the soft filesystem limit. Use whatever split parameters you fancy for the file sizes. The "srm" port has fancy features for file/directory deletions. Cheers, Brent From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 22:32:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B67F16A41A for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:32:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E73B013C45D for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:32:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0HMS00p005752; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:28:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0HMRv16005749; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:28:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:27:57 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: robert@webtent.com In-Reply-To: <1200607624.7281.95.camel@columbus.webtent.org> Message-ID: <20080117232650.W5729@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <1200602606.7281.48.camel@columbus.webtent.org> <20080117221629.Y5573@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <1200605532.7281.74.camel@columbus.webtent.org> <20080117224645.D5606@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <1200607624.7281.95.camel@columbus.webtent.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: db performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:32:28 -0000 >> use systat > > Using 'systat -iostat' it shows mostly idle with 25-70 MB/s on the aacd0 > array. Most of time above 50. Thanks for the help! > > -- > Robert > > 70MB/s can't be "mostly idle". or you meant CPU mostly idle. changing to RAID-not5 will help. seeking why disk traffic is so high - will help even more. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 23:20:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA68216A41A for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:20:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from enno@bashful.metva.com.au) Received: from bashful.metva.com.au (bashful.metva.com.au [202.0.82.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D71413C46A for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:20:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from enno@bashful.metva.com.au) Received: from bashful.metva.com.au (localhost.metva.com [127.0.0.1]) by bashful.metva.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E71633C50 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:48:41 +1100 (EST) Received: (from enno@localhost) by bashful.metva.com.au (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m0HMmf6G018775 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:48:41 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from enno) Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:48:41 +1100 From: Enno Davids To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080117224841.GA1162@bashful.metva.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: disk recovery tools... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:20:26 -0000 Guys, moving disks from an old server to a new one I suffered from a moment of brain fade last night and newfs'ed a drive I shouldn't have. One of that new crop that is so large you won't have an adequate backup for it... :( So, just wondering if there are any disk recovery tools that might be able to find whats left of the files or some portion thereof. My guess is that things like the indirect blocks live on in the data area and some portion of what was there might be recoverable to a greater or lesser degree... Thanks in advance, Enno. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 01:06:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C96D16A41B for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:06:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.153]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC54213C45B for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:06:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so976216fgg.35 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:06:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=9lgeRfbrfxoOkv9e5MYvKJcKe7JWfR7lBa+/EggS//Y=; b=TJdB77ChTkoxFZpHjc9dRt95U8mnct6X2TCJgB4p8TJGILJX+sbXHi8bz66em3a+4Kb+57f0lH1q9YvfaWt1mM0tTdrZ0vjqDWsEVm7/2lWBrFRZjCFFNyHB06QKmgRcgrcm3HL1lBSL79BigjhBwQ76sLIBdDVs+oVnBcSd9vM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=QcGo7x3DLvIpBQVlfzusLwsgdBSYbBXlBP/fSLDCSGe+In83xvM415QlBpEEz3ISHr4XKRc++Hf6MltmHqp+/y/WRbVoMy5ZMObYbgz6MHS+qqi63B+eEM8Ee7ZAjlwVkHkthH04uGqGHFnCp579AmHpp9p3sQxPrDyD2swxu9k= Received: by 10.82.167.5 with SMTP id p5mr4868554bue.2.1200618389131; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:06:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.180.16 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:06:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <560f92640801171706w7023ee1eq746b2dfec468b675@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:06:29 -0800 From: "Nerius Landys" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <31AE442CCBC1094ABC40CE85B0149F0652370B@MAIL1.registry.otago.ac.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <478F0D5A.9090107@highperformance.net> <31AE442CCBC1094ABC40CE85B0149F0652370B@MAIL1.registry.otago.ac.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Gutman Method on Empty Space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:06:31 -0000 > > Can anyone recommend a utility for the secure overwriting of > > unused disc > > space? > > split -b 200m /dev/random randomdata ; sync && rm randomdata* > > Run as many times as your paranoia factor requires on your file system. > Gutman suggests in his own writings that overwriting with random data > makes the most sense with modern disks. Run as root to extend the > writes past the soft filesystem limit. Use whatever split parameters > you fancy for the file sizes. The "srm" port has fancy features for > file/directory deletions. If I didn't misunderstand your question. If you're trying to write bits onto your disk so that nobody could recover data from it, there is a very simple way to blank out either YOUR WHOLE HARD DRIVE or AN ENTIRE SLICE ON YOUR HARD DRIVE. Using the `dd' utility you can write zero bits to an entire slice of your hard drive (or to the whole hard drive): dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ Don't do this unless you want to lose all data on a slice or hard drive. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 01:49:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BE1B16A417 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:49:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cypheros@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 250BB13C46E for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:49:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cypheros@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so225937anc.13 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:49:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=A7S5WfbGVIl+tGXCZuFLoXJJ8xMrd7rEbVY2sI73imc=; b=Mch5uXX/vpMigaVpUfyB/brM+nWQr41Bo5WdPte/9OAboXY9KkbU0WJn/0OqO8FtohvmbbPLb8xuoI0Kp+WO281Wl5Uh5o4DG0H5eoNcDl3NipRIxZTAjhRPJdYxZ8Gnt4HBPL99YJpznNMJtFxkbMrfQJv96QkUCjE5FQt69Y8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FT4b4LOnuNl6w7AlzMrDY/boS5G4a2sQLprbnpbCBIp7hNsZ7/rw1ZbJkSkqzQJBihxo4uGsiVuoO0Ba9dWuuB0LZ9PrjezzD2DuYbhZCCY+3Hab9G8ax7Yg5Dv75HGLriuo1i4Q6xsydZX1v/DcXeicuswZi2EG1rVt/bZng0M= Received: by 10.101.68.19 with SMTP id v19mr5737287ank.104.1200619354916; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:22:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.57.20 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:22:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <9a7bbc700801171722g560cbd09j8c4528a6133bf744@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:22:34 -0500 From: "Michael Hawkins" To: "Enno Davids" In-Reply-To: <20080117224841.GA1162@bashful.metva.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080117224841.GA1162@bashful.metva.com.au> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: disk recovery tools... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:49:54 -0000 >From professional experience as a data recovery technician, I can tell you that ufs2 drives are among the hardest to recover from after a format. So far the best applications that I have found for recovering data in a situation like this are testdisk and Easy Recovery Professional (by Kroll Ontrack). Obviously the ideal situation would be to get your data back in its original form, so I would try testdisk first. If that fails, however, you are going to have to use ERP (which cost money) to do a RAW recovery. Please note, however, that if you perform a RAW recovery,you will NOT recover the intact filestructure, but instead, a set of folders with your files, and the files will be renamed 'Fil001' followed by the extension. I hope this helps, Cypheros On 1/17/08, Enno Davids wrote: > Guys, > > moving disks from an old server to a new one I suffered from a moment of > brain fade last night and newfs'ed a drive I shouldn't have. One of that > new crop that is so large you won't have an adequate backup for it... :( > > So, just wondering if there are any disk recovery tools that might be able > to find whats left of the files or some portion thereof. My guess is that > things like the indirect blocks live on in the data area and some portion > of what was there might be recoverable to a greater or lesser degree... > > > Thanks in advance, > > Enno. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 05:07:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C3EE16A419 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 05:07:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from replay@sdf.lonestar.org) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.freeshell.ORG [192.94.73.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02E6713C447 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 05:07:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from replay@sdf.lonestar.org) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (replay@sdf.lonestar.org [192.94.73.1]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0I4qioF022880 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 04:52:44 GMT Received: (from replay@localhost) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.1/8.12.8/Submit) id m0I4qi9F028651; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 04:52:44 GMT Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 04:52:44 +0000 (UTC) From: Juan Ortega To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Subject: ssh tunnel question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 05:07:23 -0000 Hi, I installed freeBSD 6.3RC2 on my computer. SSH deamon is installed and working. On my linux computer I can connect easily "ssh -D 8080 myserver.com" and use it as SOCKS for firefox as proxy server. But on windows I cant using putty, I can make it local like "-L" in linux but i cant make it dynamic, i tried it but all i get is "the proxy server is refusing connections" in firefox. It works on all linux pcs but not windows, same error msg. I disabled firewall and still not working. wats wrong with it? replay@sdf.lonestar.org SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 06:18:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C802716A41A for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 06:18:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists-fbsd@shadypond.com) Received: from mx-outbound01.easydns.com (mailout1.easydns.com [205.210.42.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A9B713C458 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 06:18:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists-fbsd@shadypond.com) Received: from lilypad.shadypond.com (69-12-173-117.static.humboldt1.com [69.12.173.117]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx-outbound01.easydns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B3F1482FC for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:16:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from slider.shadypond.com (slider.shadypond.com [192.168.1.11]) by lilypad.shadypond.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F46B841 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 06:17:59 +0000 (UTC) From: Pollywog To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 06:17:34 +0000 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801180617.35477.lists-fbsd@shadypond.com> Subject: Re: ssh tunnel question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 06:18:01 -0000 On Friday 18 January 2008 04:52:44 Juan Ortega wrote: > Hi, I installed freeBSD 6.3RC2 on my computer. > SSH deamon is installed and working. > On my linux computer I can connect easily "ssh -D 8080 myserver.com" > and use it as SOCKS for firefox as proxy server. > But on windows I cant using putty, I can make it local like "-L" in linux > but i cant make it dynamic, i tried it but all i get is "the proxy server > is refusing connections" in firefox. It works on all linux pcs but not > windows, same error msg. I disabled firewall and still not working. > wats wrong with it? In Firefox, are you using SOCKS4 when connecting? Try SOCKS4. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 05:40:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF3416A417 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 05:40:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from webmaster@web-tricks.net) Received: from smtp2.abac.com (smtp2.abac.com [216.55.128.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1569613C455 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 05:40:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from webmaster@web-tricks.net) Received: from c-67-166-139-235.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([67.166.139.235] helo=dragon) by smtp2.abac.com with esmtpa id 1JFjHB-000JkO-QF for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:56:21 -0800 Message-ID: <001201c8598e$7f015140$f5dca8c0@dragon> From: "Jon" To: Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:56:32 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 06:19:20 +0000 Subject: 6.3 REL or not X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 05:40:29 -0000 Ok I was wondering around, Then found the 6.3 ISO's are these the real 6.3 release's ? Can I use these ISO's as the 6.3 release CD's ? I am asking because I never saw a word of 6.3 REL being ready. Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 06:52:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39F5F16A417 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 06:52:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C15E313C44B for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 06:52:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from c83-253-25-183.bredband.comhem.se ([83.253.25.183]:58347 helo=falcon.midgard.homeip.net) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JFl5B-0000Hc-7Y for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:52:05 +0100 Received: (qmail 16050 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2008 07:52:04 +0100 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with ESMTP; 18 Jan 2008 07:52:04 +0100 Received: (qmail 2970 invoked by uid 1001); 18 Jan 2008 07:52:04 +0100 Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:52:04 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson To: Jon Message-ID: <20080118065204.GA2954@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: Jon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <001201c8598e$7f015140$f5dca8c0@dragon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001201c8598e$7f015140$f5dca8c0@dragon> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Originating-IP: 83.253.25.183 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1JFl5B-0000Hc-7Y. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1JFl5B-0000Hc-7Y 7a89fc7fbf3d8672a025ef9c4a2e7fa1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.3 REL or not X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 06:52:07 -0000 On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 08:56:32PM -0800, Jon wrote: > Ok I was wondering around, > Then found the 6.3 ISO's > > are these the real 6.3 release's ? Maybe. Unless some last second problem is found in which case the ISO's will be rebuilt. > > Can I use these ISO's as the 6.3 release CD's ? Can? Yes. Should? Maybe not. > > I am asking because I never saw a word of 6.3 REL being ready. > Assume that 6.3 is not finished until the official announcement has gone out. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 09:38:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2519A16A46E for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:38:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.152]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C25313C46A for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:38:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so1125736fgg.35 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:38:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=AFkeekCVIq+PJAdL94thnG0EsRINfbhHXGqxeP65Zwg=; b=AX1SR5uNsJuekZl6bLclRIs6x4U+TruwfmekOuwb3hQw3TGvBX+xbczJAmdDg7BblZdyNkFEGBGpbig46e8uC33zhUjJQqmZk7tf+bszyF2GfpCseN2mbL8NRte3bI3v3cDsJlNGJwwb3QRk4+mh7DuxXCOU6N3/9hMENG4phJU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=ZdgGINALM0ykk95Bw2QmmXgteN10HWdX8hVNIdiBnEM0QomTotvZiRVjcGqHLLmgy+dh8q4bSGUMrJaTml7bLi4Y8YAObnbFf/yJ8LO85SMKscg36lZRTIaXAsvfejYzgDtlLxlTf5tlAQLs/pXMxgcfuJteNfyF+aJ5dRPevFg= Received: by 10.78.142.14 with SMTP id p14mr4155075hud.75.1200647412252; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:10:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.130.5 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:10:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <94136a2c0801180110v2e43ea2esc96393c4c3ca56f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:10:11 +0100 From: "Zbigniew Szalbot" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: FBSD or PCBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:38:43 -0000 Hello, I have a basic Acer Aspire with Vista on it but I am very unhappy about the speed of work on it. I do not want to wipe out MS system (at least not yet) but would like to give FreeBSD or PCBSD a try. 1. Am I safe by installing FreeBSD alongside Vista? Will the installation not destroy MS system? 2. I have installed FreeBSD a few times but only with console access, never with X windows. Would it be better to install PCBSD on the Acer machine? I have never configured X windows and not sure how long it could take with FreeBSD (actually I mean things like Gnome or KDE). 3. The wi-fi card is probably Acer InviLink 802.11b/g Wi-Fi. Any chance such wireless card will be supported by FreeBSD or PCBSD? Which is a better solution for a home user? Thank you very much for your practical recommendations! Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 10:01:44 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A24E16A418 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:01:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wahjava@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EC8513C44B for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:01:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wahjava@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so1647827waf.3 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 02:01:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-face:x-attribution:x-os:x-os-version:x-os-architecture:x-uptime:face:organization:pgp:x-pgp:x-pgp-fp:user-agent:sender; bh=H3Ra0DlOLLsyldfPQXFwQQakl0Wo+EY3N/+FsDvt3qs=; b=GPQi0XKQyNbiCqbfYpqBzsp05Ju9u/rn4Vi4NdpBUHtAqHP5v1HJ4h3BlqE/sudDlJj+q9O5H6owkybjqLiEnsFbwEZL3eTZQFNjmzaV8httGH+5dze7fpZDAzl0p0WIW54QuHd5I8pNEeqEpfrI97d8mEFk2JQq7/4N35uGMMg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-face:x-attribution:x-os:x-os-version:x-os-architecture:x-uptime:face:organization:pgp:x-pgp:x-pgp-fp:user-agent:sender; b=Jkejr5A2jEIpqaR9FDZvJ9SlgDGpE0XM/KLfLVr3Jy4i9Qu9hmxK6Fd2/iQ8HsqPflJPr+aBVJ0bmGuvqViFoZQAjizbmXgYrlFUj7HMCTfxbciU6Sft2Ovbej/C0VonRcPBin6EAyfvrwCFjwFQNYLkSZ1caiSWFfsBW4lKAe0= Received: by 10.114.112.1 with SMTP id k1mr681439wac.24.1200650503412; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 02:01:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from chateau.d.lf ( [122.162.250.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k9sm7049696wah.3.2008.01.18.02.01.41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 02:01:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:31:50 +0530 From: =?utf-8?B?4KSG4KS24KWA4KS3IOCktuClgeCkleCljeCksg==?= Ashish Shukla To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080118100150.GB17891@chateau.d.lf> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <94136a2c0801180110v2e43ea2esc96393c4c3ca56f@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <94136a2c0801180110v2e43ea2esc96393c4c3ca56f@mail.gmail.com> X-Face: "\:nMpJ)EA!j>2nEu-[(+&o:N+CtL^AS\, Jv*LO5qBr#W2.\=d Subject: Re: FBSD or PCBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:01:44 -0000 --0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ,--[ On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 10:10:11AM +0100, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: | Hello, |=20 | I have a basic Acer Aspire with Vista on it but I am very unhappy | about the speed of work on it. I do not want to wipe out MS system (at | least not yet) but would like to give FreeBSD or PCBSD a try. |=20 | 1. Am I safe by installing FreeBSD alongside Vista? Will the | installation not destroy MS system? Yup you're safe. But make sure you've read FreeBSD Handbook[1] before proceeding to install. | 2. I have installed FreeBSD a few times but only with console access, | never with X windows. Would it be better to install PCBSD on the Acer | machine? I have never configured X windows and not sure how long it | could take with FreeBSD (actually I mean things like Gnome or KDE). No ideas about FreeBSD supporting your Acer box. Anyways, it won't be difficult configuring X in FreeBSD, but if you're new to FreeBSD, you can try PC-BSD. | 3. The wi-fi card is probably Acer InviLink 802.11b/g Wi-Fi. Any | chance such wireless card will be supported by FreeBSD or PCBSD? No ideas. | Which is a better solution for a home user? I never used PC-BSD so no comments. References: [1] - http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ HTH --=20 Ashish Shukla =E0=A4=86=E0=A4=B6=E0=A5=80=E0=A4=B7 =E0=A4=B6=E0=A5=81=E0=A4= =95=E0=A5=8D=E0=A4=B2 http://wahjava.wordpress.com/ =C2=B7-- =C2=B7- =C2=B7=C2=B7=C2=B7=C2=B7 =C2=B7--- =C2=B7- =C2=B7=C2=B7=C2= =B7- =C2=B7- =C2=B7--=C2=B7-=C2=B7 --=C2=B7 -- =C2=B7- =C2=B7=C2=B7 =C2=B7-= =C2=B7=C2=B7 =C2=B7-=C2=B7-=C2=B7- -=C2=B7-=C2=B7 --- -- --0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHkHkOHy+EEHYuXnQRAmd4AKDeetHmfy/b4Ik1RtRE8IcJdsTgLACfXEsf PZDtILyk+t4Iytn6nXdKRLM= =+vjA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 10:06:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C650916A41A for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:06:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 399D713C461 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:06:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b27so797299fka.11 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 02:06:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.134.2 with SMTP id h2mr4239654hud.77.1200650796836; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 02:06:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.0.3? ( [217.196.247.135]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g17sm6026838nfd.10.2008.01.18.02.06.35 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 02:06:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <47907A2B.601@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:06:35 +0000 From: Robin Becker User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zbigniew Szalbot References: <94136a2c0801180110v2e43ea2esc96393c4c3ca56f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <94136a2c0801180110v2e43ea2esc96393c4c3ca56f@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FBSD or PCBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:06:38 -0000 Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: ........ > > Which is a better solution for a home user? > > Thank you very much for your practical recommendations! ....... I have had great success using PCBSD on various acers, I eventually got fed up with it being not quite identical to FreeBSD and I now have FreeBSD 6.2 on my current acer laptop (a 1680). -- Robin Becker From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 10:12:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F90316A421 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:12:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from navneet.upadhyay@gmail.com) Received: from hs-out-2122.google.com (hs-out-0708.google.com [64.233.178.246]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAC2B13C4DB for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:12:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from navneet.upadhyay@gmail.com) Received: by hs-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id h53so879196hsh.11 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 02:12:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=tQ90R4I0sXlXDj2N+LbuUVAEIGzgub9/UiizFk3XVAs=; b=FvCEDiMqGR6+LBCJ1CpIBbGIyCws4nTRlF+0QxW8V+CB1/unaqZbwJgtCi435HSw3WhASsoTeFTY+bhvShaYT7OARBON9/DDE/9CmQnYpqZBc8bRfskuP4CPXHPAOqxxDmY3KGSukX4pjT1xvlJu6JOloJPKZbIY9eAP7FtHLjU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=mohQ15295eFmweuNdFqbs2JWL2pTV2FZHVJHSYQlgoopLCUq5Tinz1NnvrfSranjopi/VM0hwAltup8tHxSfk45mv+QM/AFynjoi8IwEKYzrsZONG34WnRxdajH8uc2fDp2wNGwTbktI4PtbmaLoTaVmlVHKDZl+EkUFN9rER9E= Received: by 10.151.10.7 with SMTP id n7mr1029351ybi.6.1200649668132; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:47:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.185.7 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:47:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1563a4fd0801180147y4fb6a83s41142ac9a68c3d28@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:17:48 +0530 From: "navneet Upadhyay" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Trying to support my product on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:12:05 -0000 Hi , My product is successfully running on Linux( all most all versions) and HP- UX and Windows . *It is 100 % C++ code*. I am planning to support it on FreeBSD, i have two queries : 1. *How to build my code into binaries* on FreeBSD , i have my unix make files. Just to give an idea i have around 200 cpp files and they complile to 5 binaries . I am using multithreading(posix on linux) and sockets heavily. I dont want to run my application in linux mode, i have clear cut instructions to have BSD specific binaries.I have to see what is the difference between Linux and Free BSD in terms of file management, their structure, threading model etc. 2.* How to package the binaries*(RPM sort of thing). Idea is to provide a package to user who can install them binaries using this package by issuing single command. Please let me know if there is anyother forum where i can get answers to my queries, as i will be needing lot of help in near future. *Help will be appreciated.* Thanks, Navneet From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 10:19:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 314F516A417 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:19:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoot.lafn.org (zoot.lafn.ORG [206.117.18.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A9E13C45A for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:19:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from [10.0.1.2] (pool-71-109-145-228.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.109.145.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m0I9hv0S073143 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:43:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Message-Id: <67534DA8-62E7-4162-877D-84E00C3DBB2A@lafn.org> From: Doug Hardie To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915) Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:43:56 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.7/5493/Thu Jan 17 10:09:26 2008 on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Dell PowerEdge 1900 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:19:11 -0000 Has anyone used the 1900 with FreeBSD? The NIC is listed as a Intel=AE =20= PRO 1000PT Dual Port Server Adapter. I didn't find any reference to =20 that device in the 6.3 hardware information.= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 10:19:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B03E16A475 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:19:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from viefep32-int.chello.at (viefep32-int.chello.at [62.179.121.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B2F113C4E1 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:19:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from [192.168.1.103] (really [80.99.119.201]) by viefep32-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.08.02.02 201-2186-121-104-20070414) with ESMTP id <20080118101943.SGLP10429.viefep32-int.chello.at@[192.168.1.103]> for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:19:43 +0100 Message-ID: <47907D3F.7000207@shopzeus.com> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:19:43 +0100 From: Laszlo Nagy User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: gnumeric fails to install, 6.3-PRERELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:19:46 -0000 Enviroment: cassiopeia# uname -a FreeBSD cassiopeia.ronet 6.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.3-PRERELEASE #2: Tue Jan 15 04:41:41 EST 2008 root@cassiopeia.ronet:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CASSIOPEIA amd64 cassiopeia# portsnap fetch Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found. Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap2.FreeBSD.org... done. Latest snapshot on server matches what we already have. No updates needed. cassiopeia# portsnap update Ports tree is already up to date. The problem itself: "portupgrade -a" fails to install gnumeric. I tried to do this: cd /usr/ports/math/gnumeric make distclean make make install It starts to install gnumeric and stops with this: gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/math/gnumeric/work/gnumeric-1.8.0/doc/C/figures' gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/math/gnumeric/work/gnumeric-1.8.0/doc/C/figures' gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/math/gnumeric/work/gnumeric-1.8.0/doc/C' gmake[4]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/math/gnumeric/work/gnumeric-1.8.0/doc/C' gmake[4]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'. /bin/sh ../../mkinstalldirs /usr/local/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C for file in about-authors.xml about-history.xml about-license.xml analysis-complexNumbers.xml analysis-goalseek.xml analysis-overview.xml analysis-scenarios.xml analysis-simulation.xml analysis-solver.xml analysis-statistical.xml appendix-glossary.xml appendix-keybindings.xml bugs.xml compiling.xml configuration-localization.xml configuration-overview.xml configuration-plugins.xml configuration-preferences.xml configuration-toolbars.xml data-commentNlink.xml data-delete.xml data-entry-advanced.xml data-entry-external.xml data-entry.xml data-format.xml data-generate.xml data-insert.xml data-modify.xml data-filter.xml data-move-copy.xml data-overview.xml data-selections.xml data-types.xml documenting.xml extending-functions.xml extending-overview.xml extending-plugins.xml extending-python.xml files-formats.xml files-email.xml files-opening.xml files-overview.xml files-saving.xml files-ssconvert.xml files-textopen.xml files-textsave.xml getting-involved.xml graphics-drawings.xml graphics-images.xml graphics-overview.xml graphics-plots.xml graphics-widgets.xml gui-menus.xml gui-mouse.xml gui-other-elements.xml gui-overview.xml gui-toolbars.xml installing.xml legal.xml manual-usage.xml morehelp.xml printing.xml quick-start.xml welcome.xml workbooks.xml worksheets.xml functions.xml gnumeric.xml; do \ cp ./$file /usr/local/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C; \ done if test "figures"; then \ /bin/sh ../../mkinstalldirs /usr/local/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/figures; \ for file in ./figures/*.png; do \ basefile=`echo $file | sed -e 's,^.*/,,'`; \ install -o root -g wheel -m 444 $file /usr/local/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/figures/$basefile; \ done \ fi test -z "/usr/local/man/man1" || /usr/local/bin/gmkdir -p "/usr/local/man/man1" install -o root -g wheel -m 444 'gnumeric.1' '/usr/local/man/man1/gnumeric.1' install -o root -g wheel -m 444 'ssconvert.1' '/usr/local/man/man1/ssconvert.1' install -o root -g wheel -m 444 'ssindex.1' '/usr/local/man/man1/ssindex.1' gmake install-data-hook gmake[5]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/math/gnumeric/work/gnumeric-1.8.0/doc/C' /bin/sh ../../mkinstalldirs /usr/local/share/omf/gnumeric for file in gnumeric-C.omf; do \ install -o root -g wheel -m 444 $file.out /usr/local/share/omf/gnumeric/$file; \ done install: gnumeric-C.omf.out: No such file or directory gmake[5]: *** [install-data-hook-omf] Error 71 gmake[5]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/math/gnumeric/work/gnumeric-1.8.0/doc/C' gmake[4]: *** [install-data-am] Error 2 gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/math/gnumeric/work/gnumeric-1.8.0/doc/C' gmake[3]: *** [install-am] Error 2 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/math/gnumeric/work/gnumeric-1.8.0/doc/C' gmake[2]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/math/gnumeric/work/gnumeric-1.8.0/doc/C' gmake[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/math/gnumeric/work/gnumeric-1.8.0/doc' gmake: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/math/gnumeric. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/math/gnumeric. Is this a known bug? Should I post a PR? Thanks, Laszlo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 10:22:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EC2916A417 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:22:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norman@apache.org) Received: from vs159071.vserver.de (hiphopcorner.de [62.75.159.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B5913C461 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:22:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norman@apache.org) Received: from [10.99.0.2] (unknown [213.188.107.182]) by vs159071.vserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 646F1BE848E; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:22:11 +0000 (UTC) From: Norman Maurer To: Doug Hardie In-Reply-To: <67534DA8-62E7-4162-877D-84E00C3DBB2A@lafn.org> References: <67534DA8-62E7-4162-877D-84E00C3DBB2A@lafn.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:22:03 +0100 Message-Id: <1200651723.6968.13.camel@norman-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Dell PowerEdge 1900 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:22:13 -0000 We use a Poweredge 1950... works without probs.. bye Norman Am Freitag, den 18.01.2008, 01:43 -0800 schrieb Doug Hardie: > Has anyone used the 1900 with FreeBSD? The NIC is listed as a Intel® > PRO 1000PT Dual Port Server Adapter. I didn't find any reference to > that device in the 6.3 hardware information._______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 10:25:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E4216A421 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:25:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: from smtp3.versatel.nl (smtp3.versatel.nl [62.58.50.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4515B13C448 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:25:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 20681 invoked by uid 0); 18 Jan 2008 09:58:21 -0000 Received: from ip176-173-59-62.adsl.versatel.nl (HELO Rena.FStaals.net) ([62.59.173.176]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp3.versatel.nl (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for < >; 18 Jan 2008 09:58:21 -0000 Message-ID: <479077FC.6040001@gmx.net> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:57:16 +0100 From: Frank Staals User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071224) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zbigniew Szalbot References: <94136a2c0801180110v2e43ea2esc96393c4c3ca56f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <94136a2c0801180110v2e43ea2esc96393c4c3ca56f@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FBSD or PCBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:25:35 -0000 Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > Hello, > > I have a basic Acer Aspire with Vista on it but I am very unhappy > about the speed of work on it. I do not want to wipe out MS system (at > least not yet) but would like to give FreeBSD or PCBSD a try. > > 1. Am I safe by installing FreeBSD alongside Vista? Will the > installation not destroy MS system? > Just make sure you have free space and go. You probably want to use the FreeBSD Bootmanager but I'm not 100% sure about that ( Only running a dualboot system with FreeBSD and WinXP for which the FreeBSD bootmanager is required ) > 2. I have installed FreeBSD a few times but only with console access, > never with X windows. Would it be better to install PCBSD on the Acer > machine? I have never configured X windows and not sure how long it > could take with FreeBSD (actually I mean things like Gnome or KDE). > Depends on your needs. If you are planning on running an other WM/DE than KDE (Or at least I thought PCBSD came with KDE by default ) and you are familliar with the ports system you are better off choosing FreeBSD. Setting up X is a piece of cake nowadays. In most cases Xorg wil generate it's own configfile at start and you don't realy have to worry about it. If something doesn't work or you want to configure it somehow you can just run 'Xorg --configure' which wil generate a configfile you can edit by hand. On the other hand if you are completely new to FreeBSD, the portsystem etc than I guess you're better off installing PCBSD. > 3. The wi-fi card is probably Acer InviLink 802.11b/g Wi-Fi. Any > chance such wireless card will be supported by FreeBSD or PCBSD? > > I don't know in what way it is supported. Google will probably give you an answer. If it isn't supported natively take a look at ndis > Which is a better solution for a home user? > > Thank you very much for your practical recommendations! > > Zbigniew Szalbot > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Good Luck, -- -Frank Staals From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 10:54:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A1C616A46D for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:54:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3458E13C458 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:54:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu ([151.77.240.163]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0IAt5KB001292 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:55:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0IAsLxE031650; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:54:21 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <4790854B.70601@netfence.it> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:54:03 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: navneet Upadhyay References: <1563a4fd0801180147y4fb6a83s41142ac9a68c3d28@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1563a4fd0801180147y4fb6a83s41142ac9a68c3d28@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 212.31.247.179 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Trying to support my product on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:54:20 -0000 navneet Upadhyay ha scritto: > 1. *How to build my code into binaries* on FreeBSD , i have my unix make > files. Just to give an idea i have around 200 cpp files and they complile to > 5 binaries . I am using multithreading(posix on linux) and sockets heavily. > > I dont want to run my application in linux mode, i have clear cut > instructions to have BSD specific binaries.I have to see what is the > difference between Linux and Free BSD in terms of file management, their > structure, threading model etc. You may want to look at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/index.html. > 2.* How to package the binaries*(RPM sort of thing). Idea is to provide a > package to user who can install them binaries using this package by issuing > single command. And http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/index.html. bye av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 11:01:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88DD916A417 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:01:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB30513C4E8 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:00:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0IAuShe001681; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:56:28 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0IAuObn001678; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:56:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:56:24 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Enno Davids In-Reply-To: <20080117224841.GA1162@bashful.metva.com.au> Message-ID: <20080118115555.I1655@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20080117224841.GA1162@bashful.metva.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: disk recovery tools... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:01:01 -0000 > moving disks from an old server to a new one I suffered from a moment of > brain fade last night and newfs'ed a drive I shouldn't have. One of that > new crop that is so large you won't have an adequate backup for it... :( no rescue. newfs overwrote inodes that contained your files metadata. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 11:01:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C31E16A41A for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:01:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F63813C447 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:01:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JFoyf-0007Ma-Gn for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:01:37 +0000 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:01:37 +0000 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:01:37 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:01:29 +0100 Lines: 61 Message-ID: References: <1563a4fd0801180147y4fb6a83s41142ac9a68c3d28@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig95F51FBB25EED6D10AF5B597" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20070801) In-Reply-To: <1563a4fd0801180147y4fb6a83s41142ac9a68c3d28@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Sender: news Subject: Re: Trying to support my product on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:01:41 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig95F51FBB25EED6D10AF5B597 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable navneet Upadhyay wrote: > Hi , > My product is successfully running on Linux( all most all versio= ns) > and HP- UX and Windows . >=20 > *It is 100 % C++ code*. >=20 > I am planning to support it on FreeBSD, i have two queries : >=20 > 1. *How to build my code into binaries* on FreeBSD , i have my unix mak= e > files. Just to give an idea i have around 200 cpp files and they compli= le to > 5 binaries . I am using multithreading(posix on linux) and sockets heav= ily. gcc and g++ are included in FreeBSD base system - you get them by default. Other possible dependencies (X11, etc.) you need to install from the ports, then proceed "as usual". > I dont want to run my application in linux mode, i have clear cut > instructions to have BSD specific binaries.I have to see what is the > difference between Linux and Free BSD in terms of file management, thei= r > structure, threading model etc. >=20 >=20 > 2.* How to package the binaries*(RPM sort of thing). Idea is to provide= a > package to user who can install them binaries using this package by iss= uing > single command. Create a port directory structure, then create a binary package from the port. Take care to read hier(7), specifically about the /usr/local tree - that's where your application will install, and where the libraries installed from ports will be installed (i.e. you need -L /usr/local/lib and -I /usr/local/include, adapt as needed). --------------enig95F51FBB25EED6D10AF5B597 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHkIcKldnAQVacBcgRAk36AJ48Xank5Dt6paMmUbvhYrJOnl5iVQCfZYJl SAjGylS0IlUdGYTnXUjpj8M= =R1xE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig95F51FBB25EED6D10AF5B597-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 11:02:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 957FB16A417 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:02:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1096713C447 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:02:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0IAvhx2001688; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:57:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0IAvfQX001685; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:57:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:57:41 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Michael Hawkins In-Reply-To: <9a7bbc700801171722g560cbd09j8c4528a6133bf744@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080118115653.W1655@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20080117224841.GA1162@bashful.metva.com.au> <9a7bbc700801171722g560cbd09j8c4528a6133bf744@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Enno Davids , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: disk recovery tools... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:02:05 -0000 >> From professional experience as a data recovery technician, I can tell > you that ufs2 drives are among the hardest to recover from after a there is a little change as UFS2 use lazy inode initialization. so possibly lots can be recovered. but i don't know any soft that does it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 11:04:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C809716A41A for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:04:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D8E913C4E5 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:04:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0IAxgX4001697; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:59:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0IAxfPj001694; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:59:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:59:41 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: navneet Upadhyay In-Reply-To: <1563a4fd0801180147y4fb6a83s41142ac9a68c3d28@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080118115814.W1655@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <1563a4fd0801180147y4fb6a83s41142ac9a68c3d28@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Trying to support my product on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:04:08 -0000 > > I am planning to support it on FreeBSD, i have two queries : > > 1. *How to build my code into binaries* on FreeBSD , i have my unix make > files. Just to give an idea i have around 200 cpp files and they complile to > 5 binaries . I am using multithreading(posix on linux) and sockets heavily. > same as in linux. possibly LITTLE code change (use ifdefs) may be needed as some libc things are different. but not much. > instructions to have BSD specific binaries.I have to see what is the > difference between Linux and Free BSD in terms of file management, their > structure, threading model etc. i don't use threads so i won't tell you. rest is the same. open, read, write lseek works the same. mmap is mostly the same. > > > 2.* How to package the binaries*(RPM sort of thing). Idea is to provide a > package to user who can install them binaries using this package by issuing > single command. man pkg_create From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 11:04:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0B2016A418 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:04:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8291F13C448 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:04:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0IB0PLS001717; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:00:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0IB0PoM001714; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:00:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:00:25 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: navneet Upadhyay In-Reply-To: <1563a4fd0801180147y4fb6a83s41142ac9a68c3d28@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080118115948.A1655@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <1563a4fd0801180147y4fb6a83s41142ac9a68c3d28@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Trying to support my product on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:04:50 -0000 > Hi , > My product is successfully running on Linux( all most all versions) > and HP- UX and Windows . > if your program has both unix (any) and windows version, porting to freebsd would be at most few % of work needed to port to windows. or less From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 12:00:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF65B16A4AB for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:00:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from rosebud.otenet.gr (rosebud.otenet.gr [195.170.0.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 432A613C459 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:00:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from [192.168.0.1] (athedsl-318563.home.otenet.gr [85.72.100.1]) by rosebud.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m0IC0A3v029676; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:00:10 +0200 Message-ID: <479094D2.3000505@otenet.gr> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:00:18 +0200 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zbigniew Szalbot , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" References: <94136a2c0801180110v2e43ea2esc96393c4c3ca56f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <94136a2c0801180110v2e43ea2esc96393c4c3ca56f@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: FBSD or PCBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:00:13 -0000 Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > Hello, > > I have a basic Acer Aspire with Vista on it but I am very unhappy > about the speed of work on it. I do not want to wipe out MS system (at > least not yet) but would like to give FreeBSD or PCBSD a try. > > 1. Am I safe by installing FreeBSD alongside Vista? Will the > installation not destroy MS system? > > 2. I have installed FreeBSD a few times but only with console access, > never with X windows. Would it be better to install PCBSD on the Acer > machine? I have never configured X windows and not sure how long it > could take with FreeBSD (actually I mean things like Gnome or KDE). > > 3. The wi-fi card is probably Acer InviLink 802.11b/g Wi-Fi. Any > chance such wireless card will be supported by FreeBSD or PCBSD? > > Which is a better solution for a home user? > > Thank you very much for your practical recommendations! > > Zbigniew Szalbot > > I happen to have an Acer Aspire laptop with both FreeBSD and Vista. Have a look at some of my past posts for hints on how to install both: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2007-December/164389.html http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2007-December/165171.html As for your wifi, I can't really tell you. Mine has an Intel 3945 and lately there has been a lot of progress on the driver (Thank you Benjamin!). I do have a PCMCIA atheros based backup as well. If you need to get to a GUI quickly rather than building it yourself, PCBSD (or DesktopBSD, try www.desktopbsd.net) would be your best bet. Depending on how you choose to setup your system, in pure FreeBSD, going graphical will take you anything from a few hours (using precompiled packages) to maybe a couple of days (using ports). Read the relevant handbook chapters for information. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 12:27:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A38416A494 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:27:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from giotissl@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9568213C455 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:27:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from giotissl@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so259083anc.13 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 04:27:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=MpcxO/z9OowJOuNoLUkjMeCe2Ktq6yCEvncsbWdLwSI=; b=IYDbi0MeuBhA/YUpyJf9YICVg4ey325HIHZEmjmY2NuQfKDbzSOVzY+vQHkFOJUzXxl9FmqYEHHXRPFN+yyjrl0KMlYGrA0hQlRBi9AlkrGX10iqvtghlImi4Pg1L0M3Gc2q1M0zhLKgRBYXNWXXwM14eqeC5JqQMca33xXn+jA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=lJJ/03Jc4TL1PayHVXslvaYmygxn9SwbUuRS+wtM3h/3gLuOzG8CTvHFiUszzPaiRha/emRSO8+4iXC5pSrYebYKTcTcSRmjK7Z9xlVpxg4A2x+YDGdIQD5XqKF3QtR/hYKtg3p8HH7Awo/YCEjlIJtU/gMHNVlZezvVKJ10k3A= Received: by 10.100.167.3 with SMTP id p3mr6956179ane.69.1200659272800; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 04:27:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.211.9 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 04:27:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <795c613b0801180427r42b5c481vd8641cc0a5112f9e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:27:52 +0200 From: "Giotis Eugen" To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: freebsd - ftp setup - giotissl - ASAP - SOS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:27:54 -0000 I have a dedicated server which is based on freebsd and i forgot to install ftp at the installation. I have no access for ftp but i have the root level accounts. For control panel i have cpanel/whm. Can i install the ftp now ? How ? Can you help me step by step ? Please help me as soon as if its possible... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 12:47:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C86B16A417 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:47:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ben@iugo.com.au) Received: from ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B64213C442 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:47:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ben@iugo.com.au) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAKUpkEd5LS8n/2dsb2JhbAAIrUk X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,216,1199626200"; d="scan'208";a="38241418" Received: from ppp121-45-47-39.lns10.adl2.internode.on.net (HELO [192.168.1.5]) ([121.45.47.39]) by ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 18 Jan 2008 23:02:17 +1030 Message-ID: <47909C4D.8030500@iugo.com.au> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:02:13 +1030 From: Ben Williams User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: fsck_msdosfs failing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:47:36 -0000 Hi all, I've got a problem with fsck_msdosfs. My FAT32 drive came up with errors after a power-failure-induced reboot, and recommended that I run fsck_msdosfs manually. However, fsck_msdosfs fails: # fsck_msdosfs /dev/ad3s1 ** /dev/ad3s1 ** Phase 1 - Read and Compare FATs No space for FAT (Cannot allocate memory)# I've tried googling for it and I can't find anything other than a bug being mentioned/filed for netbsd which is obviously related, but no fix was forthcoming. Does anyone have any ideas how I can proceed? Thanks, - Ben From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 13:16:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E9916A421 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:16:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lenzi.sergio@gmail.com) Received: from ro-out-1112.google.com (ro-out-1112.google.com [72.14.202.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DE1613C459 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:16:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lenzi.sergio@gmail.com) Received: by ro-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k4so29232rog.13 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 05:16:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=vJ9lL58pJ7guyPZeY+iIV3W1Rmee7OhSUiwN3qsh/gk=; b=Mev2wbHrfRIYabgWGO/js0BrTmZK9ZW4FmnQP3p0WH7k1VT0cdRB5sB1+7GlqKn0PKOO47Js/X6w13IvA9UDKJoCquKGbuvzC+Wp4uV4jPBYXk6lRJKLEJdmAAfjiqC4lchXcER7QL4R2UIFNhIPF0MZRJbOP+YIq40MSexFC1I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; b=T07vrczNtVLr4VH9VvYv3qOtjQA5+EQyr0sQ4Q8nAnYjcPIZJRTTp5vtaNuDq2Pe7VJl/uo5PV3B76ogWZaR3K+9CMcx12w2eDT23tg+QhUJVUXgOUrxQOaWxhDewvcsd19bxipBLm30it5gRYYl04d2vNipNoGOopR/AR0E4cQ= Received: by 10.142.115.10 with SMTP id n10mr2012368wfc.19.1200662195564; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 05:16:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.32.172? ( [201.47.3.162]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm4896355wrh.22.2008.01.18.05.16.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 05:16:34 -0800 (PST) From: Sergio Lenzi To: Giotis Eugen , questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <795c613b0801180427r42b5c481vd8641cc0a5112f9e@mail.gmail.com> References: <795c613b0801180427r42b5c481vd8641cc0a5112f9e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:14:59 +0000 Message-Id: <1200654899.1845.1.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: freebsd - ftp setup - giotissl - ASAP - SOS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:16:37 -0000 Em Sex, 2008-01-18 às 14:27 +0200, Giotis Eugen escreveu: > I have a dedicated server which is based on freebsd and i forgot to install > ftp at the installation. > I have no access for ftp but i have the root level accounts. > For control panel i have cpanel/whm. > Can i install the ftp now ? > How ? > Can you help me step by step ? > > > Please help me as soon as if its possible... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" at the root console prompt......... sysinstall go to the configure -> networking-> ftp choose install option. exit sysinstall and you are done.... Sergio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 13:38:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9288C16A417 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:38:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msherman77@yahoo.com) Received: from web88302.mail.re4.yahoo.com (web88302.mail.re4.yahoo.com [216.39.53.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 27C9C13C448 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:38:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msherman77@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 83996 invoked by uid 60001); 18 Jan 2008 13:38:18 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=lCzVgKvo2GUpKNM4JAIA8VIkad37RLr7gh04CHloeoZqW7dJiNIP2ISjV8CWp8Pfxs0sBb4eBQqJNxR87zOagSaCf/vOPIu05YSR26vnr6GYHznAtwpulAMEXkdxUp9Ckg2n2b3WkPju6lz+QrabfBrmitHIZw/kdKhg4etu8A0=; X-YMail-OSG: iwgmHHIVM1nv5LgzsCY4_BOtSWdjiv8FRlUnV1Ie40q8gy7isSMO2_CA8tXm7TIrk_4P3unbntqUG.rda5gM6MYxUfpXBP6jbcpwINYnbSHlxLVBd64fMXr_y_f5xypZSpV76qlIuJ5Dsw-- Received: from [204.253.245.126] by web88302.mail.re4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:38:18 EST Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:38:18 -0500 (EST) From: Michael S To: freesbie@gufi.org, FreeBSD Mailing List MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <474105.82987.qm@web88302.mail.re4.yahoo.com> Cc: Subject: Freesbie on USB stick + qemu X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:38:19 -0000 Good day all, Just recently I discovered a new (for me) way of using Freesbie and I wanted to share it with you. A few months ago the motherboard on my FreeBSD machine gave up, and I had no way of running Unix anymore (aside from my ancient Toshiba that runs OpenBSD). Ive always liked Freesbie, but using it as a LiveCD and rebooting between it and XP is daunting. Googling for linux usb brought me to this site http://www.pendrivelinux.com/ . I tried most of the Linux distros they have on that site, however for some reason or another I was not satisfied, either it didnt have gcc (damn small) or couldnt connect to the internet (ubuntu). Then I remembered Freesbie and decided to give it a try, running it from a usb stick using Qemu. I followed the instructions for Ubuntu http://www.pendrivelinux.com/2008/01/11/run-ubuntu-710-from-windows/ And the only thing that I had to do was to replace the Ubuntu ISO image with the one of Freesbie. It feels pretty snappy with Kqemu acceleration driver installed. I can even store stuff on the stick; after running the mountdisks script, an ext2fs partition is mounted and I was able to save files on it and they were there the next time I started Freesbie. I am able to connect to the network. The only issue that I have is when running X (startx), the window is tiny (800 X 600 pixels I believe), but its not a big deal. Hope someone finds it interesting, Michael Michael Sherman http://msherman77.blogspot.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 13:50:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2A0316A4A1 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:50:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from williamkow@gmail.com) Received: from po-out-1718.google.com (po-out-1718.google.com [72.14.252.155]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A42713C4E1 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:50:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from williamkow@gmail.com) Received: by po-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id b23so33551poe.3 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 05:50:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=bIob24pC5ySFvc73nA03EaEIlojFtrMDSAN40V/AX2o=; b=Qz5xy8b5EOZwJJMwgb8cjPDLySsFkL553HP7vK36DVAb/h1IpU1pVhVBtgoPNf4vZrVPK5BIpnL2Q1nGrwuXi0fv8FMzy99YzgDCOjH7DfCj+3hp9va0uVK0xPxjW9TQlhLBfkN48NDdDhSzdtBrjeEyn3UDF+P5SQ6gDKF6W28= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; b=MabksFaCJvJ0i2KlLtrChasrV9gBFWcEKjgE2IXPdnjtcjcHTLq7O/N18h47/yfLzOY+lPtgU2TVzHlnDQ+XF7ROnX3E4ap1+l9cDlwaTBA2i3YMYWwH/C/J0f94+hzAXOCuXyVcrkysgaGizH6cox4l3VZplF8H26pRLX+tV7g= Received: by 10.141.193.1 with SMTP id v1mr2385375rvp.73.1200663360115; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 05:36:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.32.131.138? ( [203.92.154.37]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f14sm2552031qba.25.2008.01.18.05.35.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 05:35:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4790AB33.606@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:35:47 +0800 From: williamkow User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071114) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zbigniew Szalbot References: <94136a2c0801180110v2e43ea2esc96393c4c3ca56f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <94136a2c0801180110v2e43ea2esc96393c4c3ca56f@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FBSD or PCBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:50:49 -0000 The FreeBSD Laptop Compatibility List http://laptop.bsdgroup.de/freebsd/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_BSD_operating_systems http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freebsd Both DesktopBSD & PC-BSD are suitable for home users. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PC-BSD http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DesktopBSD Architecture : Desktop Environment | Window Manager | X Server (X.org/XFree.org) | Kernel KDE ===== - Memory consuming (but user friendly) - use QT library but may not free (http://trolltech.com/products/qt/licenses) - Very suitable for home users - full multimedia support (eg. good CD writer) - Highly customisable for window environment settings. GNOME ====== - Efficient memory usage (simple & fast) - uses Gtk library, is free & part of GNU project (http://www.gtk.org/) - major enterprise linux distributions (Redhat, Suse, Fedora, Debian, CentOS, - Highest distribution due to popularity of Ubuntu (http://distrowatch.com/) KDE vs. GNOME, Which is better ? http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/article.php/3671906 Which Has the Best Applications? KDE or GNOME http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/osrc/article.php/3673321 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > Hello, > > I have a basic Acer Aspire with Vista on it but I am very unhappy > about the speed of work on it. I do not want to wipe out MS system (at > least not yet) but would like to give FreeBSD or PCBSD a try. > > 1. Am I safe by installing FreeBSD alongside Vista? Will the > installation not destroy MS system? > > 2. I have installed FreeBSD a few times but only with console access, > never with X windows. Would it be better to install PCBSD on the Acer > machine? I have never configured X windows and not sure how long it > could take with FreeBSD (actually I mean things like Gnome or KDE). > > 3. The wi-fi card is probably Acer InviLink 802.11b/g Wi-Fi. Any > chance such wireless card will be supported by FreeBSD or PCBSD? > > Which is a better solution for a home user? > > Thank you very much for your practical recommendations! > > Zbigniew Szalbot > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 13:58:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEAED16A468 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:58:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msherman77@yahoo.com) Received: from web88310.mail.re4.yahoo.com (web88310.mail.re4.yahoo.com [216.39.53.233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6959913C468 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:58:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msherman77@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 63200 invoked by uid 60001); 18 Jan 2008 13:58:18 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=Db7vk8ZuBv5x72WiTYti/7HXt4fodiMMMsjACbdLedFVlYcnqQ8PWfEasu4yJZEHpg0pbSyosJmPSQ0VTy5G7eOY8BSQETsXd085IdsZpVABp8QM7TLmu10JppOt58mB9P2KfXJFE7lrSr22lZ0+HvLxcnwt/2dJs4vVFNogiwc=; X-YMail-OSG: ni9UnZwVM1l8ftDRh5OgqgmpqF2dQmAiR_jVE5fXHf0b6cpI4TKxaCJMn2cMVg7MzcSplEugshTp.BhWEYRNV_pOVAzQvFKLVN_d1MIVfFH4w3JFrSU- Received: from [204.253.245.126] by web88310.mail.re4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:58:18 EST Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:58:18 -0500 (EST) From: Michael S To: William Bulley , FreeBSD Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20080118135748.GD35080@dell1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <355840.62625.qm@web88310.mail.re4.yahoo.com> Cc: Subject: Re: Freesbie on USB stick + qemu X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:58:20 -0000 I should have been clearer, I am running Freesbie from a usb stick. However it is running inside Qemu with XP being the host machine. Michael --- William Bulley wrote: > According to Michael S : > > > > Then I remembered Freesbie and > > decided to give it a try, running it from a usb > stick > > using Qemu. I followed the instructions for Ubuntu > > > http://www.pendrivelinux.com/2008/01/11/run-ubuntu-710-from-windows/ > > And the only thing that I had to do was to replace > the > > Ubuntu ISO image with the one of Freesbie. It > feels > > pretty snappy with Kqemu acceleration driver > installed. > > G'day! > > I must be dense today, but I don't understand the > QEMU > connection in your above post. Are you using QEMU > on > the host machine or on the Freesbie pendrive system? > > And if the former, what is the point (or benefit) to > you? > And does this have anything to do with your broken > main > board? I take it you are running Freesbie on your > OpenBSD > laptop? Else why make the reference to it? > > Like I said, I am confused... :-( > > Regards, > > web... > > -- > William Bulley Email: > web@umich.edu > > Michael Sherman http://msherman77.blogspot.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 14:27:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0128E16A418 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:27:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA5A313C4DD for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:27:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (jn@ns1 [69.55.238.237]) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m0IERBQV030574; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:27:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: (from www@localhost) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id m0IERBRt030573; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:27:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) X-Authentication-Warning: ns1.jnielsen.net: www set sender to lists@jnielsen.net using -f Received: from nc-2wac-zop06.wachovia.com (nc-2wac-zop06.wachovia.com [162.111.235.17]) by newwebmail.jnielsen.net (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:27:11 -0500 Message-ID: <20080118092711.t7725zf7xckwswck@newwebmail.jnielsen.net> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:27:11 -0500 From: John Nielsen To: Zbigniew Szalbot , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <94136a2c0801180110v2e43ea2esc96393c4c3ca56f@mail.gmail.com> <47907A2B.601@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <47907A2B.601@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.4) / FreeBSD-4.9 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: Re: FBSD or PCBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:27:12 -0000 Quoting Robin Becker : > Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > ........ >> >> Which is a better solution for a home user? >> >> Thank you very much for your practical recommendations! > ....... > > I have had great success using PCBSD on various acers, I eventually > got fed up with it being not quite identical to FreeBSD and I now > have FreeBSD 6.2 on my current acer laptop (a 1680). > -- I was unable to even boot my Wife's Acer (an Aspire 5520) with FreeBSD 6.3-pre or 7.0-pre. I'm also pretty sure the Acer wireless is NOT supported by any native drivers; I haven't seen any success or failure stories from anyone trying NDIS. I expect the same will be true with PC-BSD, since AFAIK their kernel is pretty much stock FreeBSD (main differences are in the installer and package management). JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 15:17:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C015E16A41B for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:17:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from toreld@netscape.net) Received: from mail49.e.nsc.no (mail49.e.nsc.no [193.213.115.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11C7213C442 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:17:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from toreld@netscape.net) Received: from [62.16.186.121] (062016186121.customer.alfanett.no [62.16.186.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail49.nsc.no (8.13.8/8.13.5) with ESMTP id m0IEwvCf008825; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:58:58 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <4790BE6F.9030704@netscape.net> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:57:51 +0100 From: Tore Lund User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071208) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frank Staals , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <94136a2c0801180110v2e43ea2esc96393c4c3ca56f@mail.gmail.com> <479077FC.6040001@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <479077FC.6040001@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: FBSD or PCBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:17:11 -0000 Frank Staals wrote: > Just make sure you have free space and go. You probably want to use the > FreeBSD Bootmanager but I'm not 100% sure about that ( Only running a > dualboot system with FreeBSD and WinXP for which the FreeBSD bootmanager > is required ) FreeBSD boot manager shouldn't be required for WinXP. I am using the Windows 2000 boot loader myself. It's very simple as long as FreeBSD is on the first disk. Watch your steps if FreeBSD is on another disk: http://www.unixguide.net/freebsd/faq/09.10.shtml -- Tore From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 15:25:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7084616A418 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:25:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thiago.matias@tecnologiabr.com.br) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39BA313C46B for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:25:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thiago.matias@tecnologiabr.com.br) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m34so1969057wag.9 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:25:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.115.74.1 with SMTP id b1mr938427wal.93.1200668810083; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:06:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.115.89.12 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:06:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <428ea670801180706i4d12689fr46718fd88cf995a2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:06:50 -0200 From: "Thiago Matias" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Partnership X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:25:04 -0000 Good Afternoon. I dsa TecnologiaBR school of Informatica in Brasilia, and would like to see the possibility to achieve a partnership with FreeBSD, because I have a very good demand of companies that training for the use of their products. I Grato for your attention -- Att, Thiago Matias Gerente de Treinamentos e Projetos TecnologiaBR www.tecnologiabr.com.br thiago.matias@tecnologiabr.com.br ou tmatias23@gmail.com Skype: tmatias23 QI 15 lote 1/3 - Taguatinga Norte SGAS 906 Conj F - Plano Piloto TEL 5561 3354-3162 ou 5561 8423-4142 The TecnologiaBR, focuses on the area of education and development of technology. Our trainings have excellent technical level and didactic. Our instructors are certified in the most important evidence of the market. With excellent infrastructure and teaching material. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 15:44:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A29116A417 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:44:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdq@peterk.org) Received: from poshta.pknet.net (poshta.pknet.net [216.241.167.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3EB4E13C44B for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:44:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdq@peterk.org) Received: (qmail 79273 invoked by uid 98); 18 Jan 2008 15:19:41 -0000 Received: from 216.241.167.213 by poshta.pknet.net (envelope-from , uid 82) with qmail-scanner-2.01 (clamdscan: 0.91.2/5145. spamassassin: 3.2.3. Clear:RC:1(216.241.167.213):. Processed in 0.06341 secs); 18 Jan 2008 15:19:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.pknet.net) (216.241.167.213) by poshta.pknet.net with SMTP; 18 Jan 2008 15:19:40 -0000 Received: from 63.65.46.186 (SquirrelMail authenticated user fbsdq@peterk.org) by webmail.pknet.net with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:19:41 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <1147.63.65.46.186.1200669581.squirrel@webmail.pknet.net> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:19:41 -0700 (MST) From: fbsdq@peterk.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: apache coredump with 'mhash' php extension enabled X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:44:19 -0000 iH, Apache is dumping core if I have the following enabled in php/mod_php: mailds:#grep -v ^# /usr/local/etc/php/extensions.ini extension=mhash.so mailds:#/usr/local/etc/rc.d/apache start Starting apache. mailds:#tail -3 /var/log/messages Jan 18 07:57:37 mailds kernel: pid 95875 (httpd), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) Jan 18 07:58:30 mailds kernel: pid 95885 (httpd), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) Jan 18 07:58:31 mailds kernel: pid 95894 (httpd), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) nothing is being written to httpd-error.log mailds:#tail -1 /var/log/httpd-error.log [Thu Jan 17 12:49:18 2008] [notice] caught SIGTERM, shutting down but with that php extension commented out: mailds:#grep -v ^# /usr/local/etc/php/extensions.ini mailds:# mailds:#tail -3 /var/log/httpd-error.log [Thu Jan 17 12:49:18 2008] [notice] caught SIGTERM, shutting down [Fri Jan 18 08:01:29 2008] [notice] Apache/1.3.39 (Unix) PHP/5.2.5 with Suhosin-Patch configured -- resuming normal operations [Fri Jan 18 08:01:29 2008] [notice] Accept mutex: flock (Default: flock) mailds:#ps auxw|grep httpd|wc -l 6 I've also tried this another box,fresh install yesterday with latest cvsup RELENG_7; It does the same apache core dump, with only apache13/php5/php5-mhash installed. This was all installed from ports [make install], I've tested with my httpd.conf file and default one, still this php extension causes apache to coredump mailds:#pkg_info |egrep "apache|php|hash" apache-1.3.39_2 The extremely popular Apache http server. Very fast, very c mhash-0.9.9 An easy-to-use library for strong hashes such as MD5 and SH php5-5.2.5 PHP Scripting Language php5-gettext-5.2.5 The gettext shared extension for php php5-iconv-5.2.5 The iconv shared extension for php php5-mbstring-5.2.5 The mbstring shared extension for php php5-mhash-5.2.5 The mhash shared extension for php php5-openssl-5.2.5 The openssl shared extension for php php5-pcre-5.2.5 The pcre shared extension for php php5-pgsql-5.2.5 The pgsql shared extension for php php5-session-5.2.5 The session shared extension for php php5-xml-5.2.5 The xml shared extension for php I've got the latest code cvsup from Jan 17, world rebuilt for RELENG_7, latest portsnap from about the same time - this is fresh install of 7-beta4, cvsupped to "7.0-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE #0: Thu Jan 17 09:33:41 MST 2008" I've got the mhash running on another box, but that was done awhile ago with with version 0.9.7.. [it's required for squirrelmail]. Any ideas anyone? gdb httpd /httpd.core doesn't give out much info, php in debug mode, still not seeing anything in logs. php cli works fine: [php code from php.net mhash example] mailds:#grep -v ^# /usr/local/etc/php/extensions.ini extension=mhash.so mailds:#php php.t The hash is d03cb659cbf9192dcd066272249f8412
The hmac is 750c783e6ab0b503eaa86e310a5db738
and with extension disabled [no surprise]; mailds:#grep -v ^# /usr/local/etc/php/extensions.ini mailds:#php php.t PHP Fatal error: Call to undefined function mhash() in /usr/local/etc/apache/php.t on line 6 so I know it works, just curious if anyone has mhash 0.9.9 working with apache13/any ideas about what is going on? ]Peter[ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 16:02:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A07916A46C for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:02:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a@jenisch.at) Received: from srvdmz13.oekb.co.at (srvdmz13.oekb.co.at [143.245.5.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98FB513C4CE for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:02:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a@jenisch.at) Received: from msc01-n1 [143.245.2.187] by srvdmz13.oekb.co.at - SurfControl E-mail Filter (6.0.0); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:02:15 +0100 Received: from aurora.oekb.co.at ([143.245.9.16]) by MAIL1.oekb.co.at with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:02:15 +0100 Received: from aurora.oekb.co.at (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by aurora.oekb.co.at (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0IF2EOS003105 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:02:14 +0100 Received: (from ej@localhost) by aurora.oekb.co.at (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m0IF2EYG003104 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:02:14 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: aurora.oekb.co.at: ej set sender to a@jenisch.at using -f Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:02:14 +0100 From: Ewald Jenisch To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080118150214.GA3092@aurora.oekb.co.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Jan 2008 15:02:15.0502 (UTC) FILETIME=[1CC28EE0:01C859E3] X-SEF-ZeroHour-RefID: fgs=0 X-SEF-7853D99-ADF1-478E-8894-213D316B8FFA: 1 X-SEF-Processed: 6_0_0_39__2008_01_18_16_02_15 Subject: Anycast DNS - anybody? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:02:59 -0000 Hi, Has anybody out there configured anycast DNS (where multiple instances of a DNS-server run under the same IP-address in different parts of the network) under FreeBSD? I'm looking for some hints to get started, but googling around didn't provide much info on that topic... Thanks much in advance for any clue. Regards, -ewald From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 16:13:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C810A16A41B for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:13:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4483F13C458 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:13:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l15so986109rvb.43 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:13:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=9I5vnCxHVoK1W+1AA4NhxxHmoAlwKdTt9Y+2oqV9pR8=; b=TZBTlWiq8qT9r+UylQD0Pj9/e+1KrcEZGqNoVudMOZIpAMqQAEZaP5EokGrOAfq4iWUc3uZlkZlLAX346ivhikyEqKyq3uwxQV7Pfo7UHep1EzmU2kaYcVDixGN+04m9T9kwJG1U6dUOYouZ/DL3/unEqQUUTwTIQD8UtEgBBp8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=GuA5JfydfiP79/2EVzc2tZVXebhQTKyZYJSbBY0dTs2fuyPitwJx+VjDSS+h2n2ht9lPxhxeuI3fZJkX2alFDK+gv4OY5bUvISF4+DCqLhz7iCZ4UekzjWkxBRNG8KTKvDXlqxYh1VuMcOJzy8EjUvtP91DzX6y5xY+UHMdZrJg= Received: by 10.141.62.15 with SMTP id p15mr2488397rvk.159.1200672800641; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:13:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.141.7 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:13:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:13:20 -0600 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Ben Williams" In-Reply-To: <47909C4D.8030500@iugo.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <47909C4D.8030500@iugo.com.au> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fsck_msdosfs failing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:13:21 -0000 On 18/01/2008, Ben Williams wrote: > Hi all, > > I've got a problem with fsck_msdosfs. My FAT32 drive came up with errors > after a power-failure-induced reboot, and recommended that I run > fsck_msdosfs manually. However, fsck_msdosfs fails: > > # fsck_msdosfs /dev/ad3s1 > ** /dev/ad3s1 > ** Phase 1 - Read and Compare FATs > No space for FAT (Cannot allocate memory)# > > I've tried googling for it and I can't find anything other than a bug > being mentioned/filed for netbsd which is obviously related, but no fix > was forthcoming. > > Does anyone have any ideas how I can proceed? Are you still in single user mode at this point? -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 16:36:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEEEA16A420 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:36:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from javier@kjsl.org) Received: from cat1.kjsl.com (cat1.kjsl.com [216.129.110.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F9DD13C45D for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:36:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from javier@kjsl.org) Received: from cat1.kjsl.com (localhost.kjsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by cat1.kjsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C425D02; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:16:57 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=kjsl.org; h=date:from:to: cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version: content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns/txt; s=selector1; bh= KtS6MrvwN1sK2YNiNYCh34QhANc=; b=MHwIcN3s9avgeKIJVyvtojIMvzdXM5+h 3G9cij2z18aB8NsuGpl+yLrbFJr7p3K8pL58O7Ul25SE3ZCpcnTylZVrqYltsIaf WGNV2jx5IRHSwRZfRkhvIRSubgdVI+Xox4fsvUw6QhXHz1u8uUuNJa41E88V5aUp Mv74MATRl8E= Received: from dhcp-64-102-159-44.cisco.com (dhcp-64-102-159-44.cisco.com [64.102.159.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: javier) by cat1.kjsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30F5C5CEC; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:16:57 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:16:31 -0500 From: Javier Henderson To: Ewald Jenisch Message-ID: <20080118111631832931.685a1215@kjsl.org> In-Reply-To: <20080118150214.GA3092@aurora.oekb.co.at> References: <20080118150214.GA3092@aurora.oekb.co.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: GyazMail version 1.5.7 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anycast DNS - anybody? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:36:05 -0000 On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:02:14 +0100, Ewald Jenisch wrote: > Has anybody out there configured anycast DNS (where multiple instances > of a DNS-server run under the same IP-address in different parts of > the network) under FreeBSD? Yes. Nothing really special on the FreeBSD side though. Just an alias address on one of the NIC's. -jav From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 16:39:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB54416A468 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:39:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdq@peterk.org) Received: from poshta.pknet.net (poshta.pknet.net [216.241.167.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 312DD13C46A for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:39:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdq@peterk.org) Received: (qmail 97065 invoked by uid 98); 18 Jan 2008 16:41:23 -0000 Received: from 216.241.167.213 by poshta.pknet.net (envelope-from , uid 82) with qmail-scanner-2.01 (clamdscan: 0.91.2/5145. spamassassin: 3.2.3. Clear:RC:1(216.241.167.213):. Processed in 0.034784 secs); 18 Jan 2008 16:41:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.pknet.net) (216.241.167.213) by poshta.pknet.net with SMTP; 18 Jan 2008 16:41:23 -0000 Received: from 63.65.46.186 (SquirrelMail authenticated user fbsdq@peterk.org) by webmail.pknet.net with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:41:23 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <4119.63.65.46.186.1200674483.squirrel@webmail.pknet.net> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:41:23 -0700 (MST) From: fbsdq@peterk.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: enno.davids@metva.com.au Subject: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:39:20 -0000 I've used /usr/ports/sysutils/testdisk to recover my BSD partitions, but it was just a HD failure/MBR nukage, no newfs was run on it - Try that. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 16:41:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E9916A419 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:41:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdq@peterk.org) Received: from poshta.pknet.net (poshta.pknet.net [216.241.167.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 107D813C457 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:41:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdq@peterk.org) Received: (qmail 97490 invoked by uid 98); 18 Jan 2008 16:43:20 -0000 Received: from 216.241.167.213 by poshta.pknet.net (envelope-from , uid 82) with qmail-scanner-2.01 (clamdscan: 0.91.2/5145. spamassassin: 3.2.3. Clear:RC:1(216.241.167.213):. Processed in 0.034738 secs); 18 Jan 2008 16:43:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.pknet.net) (216.241.167.213) by poshta.pknet.net with SMTP; 18 Jan 2008 16:43:20 -0000 Received: from 63.65.46.186 (SquirrelMail authenticated user fbsdq@peterk.org) by webmail.pknet.net with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:43:20 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <4131.63.65.46.186.1200674600.squirrel@webmail.pknet.net> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:43:20 -0700 (MST) From: fbsdq@peterk.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: enno.davids@metva.com.au Subject: Re: disk recovery tools... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:41:17 -0000 with a subject this time... I've used /usr/ports/sysutils/testdisk to recover my BSD partitions, but it was just a HD failure/MBR nukage, no newfs was run on it - Try that. ]Peter[ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 16:55:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5329016A418 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:55:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0011A13C448 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:55:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m0IGqo0Z099206; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:52:50 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m0IGqolw099205; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:52:50 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:52:50 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Jon Message-ID: <20080118165250.GE98944@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <001201c8598e$7f015140$f5dca8c0@dragon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001201c8598e$7f015140$f5dca8c0@dragon> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.3 REL or not X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:55:14 -0000 On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 08:56:32PM -0800, Jon wrote: > Ok I was wondering around, > Then found the 6.3 ISO's > > are these the real 6.3 release's ? They are not release unless they say RELEASE. Having said that, they are very much the same thing at this point. > > Can I use these ISO's as the > 6.3 release CD's ? You probably can. > > I am asking because I never saw a word of 6.3 REL being ready. It hasn't been officially announced yet. I suspect that final copies and mirrors are being built. Maybe there was a little setback because I notice a couple of security bug announcements a couple days ago. So, they probably had to start the builds over again with the fixes. ////jerry > > Thanks > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 17:01:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 767D016A474 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:01:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from giles.williams@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D19113C448 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:01:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from giles.williams@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id l8so814488nzf.13 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:01:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=IgSSgbEGhHUKoQ6CoRG8caIscnPUaMvWq3OXrwUUVOM=; b=nTAGRCBIQaIcSfH0q3TT2ZpPCFaq2QGxA05lPO8afYi6EShX8ZQiXW52e6Zp+NBEdQfBFl0I8XaJWX4Ikmj6YnqZaSKxLDTl8q82firtWUz1tzNFN1HiQ5MLCRHZfzFXPmYnFUZEmb4ymik06cuyrLbDDfcwsSrAgicX6W5WH9w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=O4Gm7OqMYk96kzP6hDefir9yEds1KJCeoAm3kLKPb38XxsZypxhX1spYlF7FCA+zgVKk1/CCyHO8eVnyIR7Dokm8UyAOwUN6mU1n224ENjhxCPTAbRKCEBPt09NrGePphlRxszeuqxIj5PWepzYJm0NfsHCyVyBlXW/aKPIym6E= Received: by 10.141.115.6 with SMTP id s6mr2511545rvm.47.1200674162452; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:36:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.193.1 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:36:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:36:02 +0000 From: "Giles Williams" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: L2TP over IPSec X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:01:38 -0000 Hi Everyone. I'm attempting to connect to my home network (running behind FreeBSD router) using L2TP over IPSec. The client's are Windows XP machines. I reckon I've got the IPSec running, but have no idea how to setup certificate or keys. Can anyone talk through the steps to get it all setup? I've already tried and failed to setup openvpn too... Thanks! Giles Williams. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 17:02:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id 4AFC816A46D; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:02:01 +0000 (UTC) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20080118170201.4AFC816A46D@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:02:01 +0000 (UTC) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Cc: Subject: How to get best results from FreeBSD-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:02:01 -0000 How to get the best results from FreeBSD questions. =================================================== Last update $Date: 2005/08/10 02:21:44 $ This is a regular posting to the FreeBSD questions mailing list. If you got it in answer to a message you sent, it means that the sender thinks that at least one of the following things was wrong with your message: - You left out a subject line, or the subject line was not appropriate. - You formatted it in such a way that it was difficult to read. - You asked more than one unrelated question in one message. - You sent out a message with an incorrect date, time or time zone. - You sent out the same message more than once. - You sent an 'unsubscribe' message to FreeBSD-questions. If you have done any of these things, there is a good chance that you will get more than one copy of this message from different people. Read on, and your next message will be more successful. This document is also available on the web at http://www.lemis.com/questions.html. ===================================================================== Contents: I: Introduction II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions III: Should I ask -questions or -hackers? IV: How to submit a question to FreeBSD-questions V: How to answer a question to FreeBSD-questions I: Introduction =============== This is a regular posting aimed to help both those seeking advice from FreeBSD-questions (the "newcomers"), and also those who answer the questions (the "hackers"). Note that the term "hacker" has nothing to do with breaking into other people's computers. The correct term for the latter activity is "cracker", but the popular press hasn't found out yet. The FreeBSD hackers disapprove strongly of cracking security, and have nothing to do with it. In the past, there has been some friction which stems from the different viewpoints of the two groups. The newcomers accused the hackers of being arrogant, stuck-up, and unhelpful, while the hackers accused the newcomers of being stupid, unable to read plain English, and expecting everything to be handed to them on a silver platter. Of course, there's an element of truth in both these claims, but for the most part these viewpoints come from a sense of frustration. In this document, I'd like to do something to relieve this frustration and help everybody get better results from FreeBSD-questions. In the following section, I recommend how to submit a question; after that, we'll look at how to answer one. II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions ============================================== When you subscribed to FreeBSD-questions, you got a welcome message from freebsd-questions-request@FreeBSD.ORG. In this message, amongst other things, it told you how to unsubscribe. Here's a typical message: Welcome to the freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list! If you ever want to unsubscribe or change your options (eg, switch to or from digest mode, change your password, etc.), visit your subscription page at: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions/me@me.org (obviously, substitute your mail address for "me@me.org"). You can also make such adjustments via email by sending a message to: freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org with the word 'help' in the subject or body (don't include the quotes), and you will get back a message with instructions. You must know your password to change your options (including changing the password, itself) or to unsubscribe. Normally, Mailman will remind you of your freebsd.org mailing list passwords once every month, although you can disable this if you prefer. This reminder will also include instructions on how to unsubscribe or change your account options. There is also a button on your options page that will email your current password to you. Here's the general information for the list you've subscribed to, in case you don't already have it: FREEBSD-QUESTIONS User questions This is the mailing list for questions about FreeBSD. You should not send "how to" questions to the technical lists unless you consider the question to be pretty technical. Normally, unsubscribing is even simpler than the message suggests: you don't need to specify your mail ID unless it is different from the one which you specified when you subscribed. If Majordomo replies and tells you (incorrectly) that you're not on the list, this may mean one of two things: 1. You have changed your mail ID since you subscribed. That's where keeping the original message from majordomo comes in handy. For example, the sample message above shows my mail ID as grog@lemis.de. Since then, I have changed it to grog@lemis.com. If I were to try to remove grog@lemis.com from the list, it would fail: I would have to specify the name with which I joined. 2. You're subscribed to a mailing list which is subscribed to FreeBSD-questions. If that's the case, you'll have to figure out which one it is and get your name taken off that one. If you're not sure which one it might be, check the headers of the messages you receive from freebsd-questions: maybe there's a clue there. If you've done all this, and you still can't figure out what's going on, send a message to Postmaster@FreeBSD.org, and he will sort things out for you. Don't send a message to FreeBSD-questions: they can't help you. III: Should I ask -questions or -hackers? ========================================= Two mailing lists handle general questions about FreeBSD, FreeBSD-questions and FreeBSD-hackers. In some cases, it's not really clear which group you should ask. The following criteria should help for 99% of all questions, however: If the question is of a general nature, first check whether this isn't a Frequently Asked Question (FAQ). There's a list of these questions at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/index.html, and also on your own system (once you've installed it) at /usr/share/doc/en/books/faq/index.html. Check there, and if you don't find an answer, ask FreeBSD-questions. Examples might be questions about installing FreeBSD or the use of a particular UNIX utility. If you think the question relates to a bug, but you're not sure, or you don't know how to look for it, send the message to FreeBSD-questions. If the question relates to a bug, and you're almost sure that it's a bug (for example, you can pinpoint the place in the code where it happens, and you maybe have a fix), then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. You should also enter a problem report with the send-pr utility. If the question relates to enhancements to FreeBSD, and you can make suggestions about how to implement them, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. If the question is of particularly technical nature, such as implementation details or suggestions for improvements, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. There are also a number of other specialized mailing lists, for example FreeBSD-isp, which caters to the interests of ISPs (Internet Service Providers) who run FreeBSD. If you happen to be an ISP, this doesn't mean you should automatically send your questions to FreeBSD-isp. The criteria above still apply, and it's in your interest to stick to them, since you're more likely to get good results that way. IV: How to submit a question ============================= When submitting a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider the following points: 1. Remember that nobody gets paid for answering a FreeBSD question. They do it of their own free will. You can influence this free will positively by submitting a well-formulated question supplying as much relevant information as possible. You can influence this free will negatively by submitting an incomplete, illegible, or rude question. It's perfectly possible to send a message to FreeBSD-questions and not get an answer even if you follow these rules. It's much more possible to not get an answer if you don't. In the rest of this document, we'll look at how to get the most out of your question to FreeBSD-questions. 2. Not everybody who answers FreeBSD questions reads every message: they look at the subject line and decide whether it interests them. Clearly, it's in your interest to specify a subject. ``FreeBSD problem'' or ``Help'' aren't enough. If you provide no subject at all, many people won't bother reading it. If your subject isn't specific enough, the people who can answer it may not read it. 3. When sending a new message, well, send a new message. Don't reply to some other message, erase the old content and change the subject line. That leaves an In-reply-to: header which many mail readers use to thread messages, so your message shows up as a reply to some other message. People often delete messages a whole thread at a time, so apart from irritating people, you also run a chance of having the message deleted unread. 4. Format your message so that it is legible, and PLEASE DON'T SHOUT!!!!!. We appreciate that a lot of people don't speak English as their first language, and we try to make allowances for that, but it's really painful to try to read a message written full of typos or without any line breaks. A lot of badly formatted messages come from bad mailers or badly configured mailers. The following mailers are known to send out badly formatted messages without you finding out about them: Eudora exmh Microsoft Exchange Microsoft Internet Mail Microsoft Outlook Netscape As you can see, the mailers in the Microsoft world are frequent offenders. If at all possible, use a UNIX mailer. If you must use a mailer under Microsoft environments, make sure it is set up correctly. Try not to use MIME: a lot of people use mailers which don't get on very well with MIME. For further information on this subject, check out http://www.lemis.com/email.html. 5. Make sure your time and time zone are set correctly. This may seem a little silly, since your message still gets there, but many of the people you are trying to reach get several hundred messages a day. They frequently sort the incoming messages by subject and by date, and if your message doesn't come before the first answer, they may assume they missed it and not bother to look. 6. Don't include unrelated questions in the same message. Firstly, a long message tends to scare people off, and secondly, it's more difficult to get all the people who can answer all the questions to read the message. 7. Specify as much information as possible. This is a difficult area, and we need to expand on what information you need to submit, but here's a start: If you get error messages, don't say ``I get error messages'', say (for example) ``I get the error message 'No route to host'''. If your system panics, don't say ``My system panicked'', say (for example) ``my system panicked with the message 'free vnode isn't'''. If you have difficulty installing FreeBSD, please tell us what hardware you have. In particular, it's important to know the IRQs and I/O addresses of the boards installed in your machine. If you have difficulty getting PPP to run, describe the configuration. Which version of PPP do you use? What kind of authentication do you have? Do you have a static or dynamic IP address? What kind of messages do you get in the log file? 8. If you don't get an answer immediately, or if you don't even see your own message appear on the list immediately, don't resend the message. Wait at least 24 hours. The FreeBSD mailer offloads messages to a number of subordinate mailers around the world, and sometimes it can take several hours for the mail to get through. And once it gets through, the one person who might know the answer will probably just have gone to bed in his part of the world. 9. If you do all this, and you still don't get an answer, there could be other reasons. For example, the problem is so complicated that nobody knows the answer, or the person who does know the answer was offline. If you don't get an answer after, say, a week, it might help to re-send the message. If you don't get an answer to your second message, though, you're probably not going to get one from this forum. Resending the same message again and again will only make you unpopular. To summarize, let's assume you know the answer to the following question (yes, it's the same one in each case :-). You choose which of these two questions you would be more prepared to answer: Message 1: Subject: (none) I just can't get hits damn silly FereBSD system to workd, and Im really good at this tsuff, but I have never seen anythign sho difficult to install, it jst wont work whatever I try so why don't y9ou guys tell me what I doing wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message 2: Subject: Problems installing FreeBSD I've just got the FreeBSD 2.1.5 CD-ROM from Walnut Creek, and I'm having a lot of difficulty installing it. I have a 66 MHz 486 with 16 MB of memory and an Adaptec 1540A SCSI board, a 1.2GB Quantum Fireball disk and a Toshiba 3501XA CD-ROM drive. The installation works just fine, but when I try to reboot the system, I get the message "Missing Operating System". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- V: How to follow up to a question ================================= Often you will want to send in additional information to a question you have already sent. The best way to do this is to reply to your original message. This has three advantages: 1. You include the original message text, so people will know what you're talking about. Don't forget to trim unnecessary text out, though. 2. The text in the subject line stays the same (you did remember to put one in, didn't you?). Many mailers will sort messages by subject. This helps group messages together. 3. The message reference numbers in the header will refer to the previous message. Some mailers, such as mutt, can thread messages, showing the exact relationships between the messages. VI: How to answer a question ============================ Before you answer a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider: 1. A lot of the points on submitting questions also apply to answering questions. Read them. 2. Has somebody already answered the question? The easiest way to check this is to sort your incoming mail by subject: then (hopefully) you'll see the question followed by any answers, all together. If somebody has already answered it, it doesn't automatically mean that you shouldn't send another answer. But it makes sense to read all the other answers first. 3. Do you have something to contribute beyond what has already been said? In general, "Yeah, me too" answers don't help much, although there are exceptions, like when somebody is describing a problem he's having, and he doesn't know whether it's his fault or whether there's something wrong with the hardware or software. If you do send a "me too" answer, you should also include any further relevant information. 4. Are you sure you understand the question? Very frequently, the person who asks the question is confused or doesn't express himself very well. Even with the best understanding of the system, it's easy to send a reply which doesn't answer the question. This doesn't help: you'll leave the person who submitted the question more frustrated or confused than ever. If nobody else answers, and you're not too sure either, you can always ask for more information. 5. Are you sure your answer is correct? If not, wait a day or so. If nobody else comes up with a better answer, you can still reply and say, for example, "I don't know if this is correct, but since nobody else has replied, why don't you try replacing your ATAPI CD-ROM with a frog?". 6. Unless there's a good reason to do otherwise, reply to the sender and to FreeBSD-questions. Many people on the FreeBSD-questions are "lurkers": they learn by reading messages sent and replied to by others. If you take a message which is of general interest off the list, you're depriving these people of their information. Be careful with group replies; lots of people send messages with hundreds of CCs. If this is the case, be sure to trim the Cc: lines appropriately. 7. Include relevant text from the original message. Trim it to the minimum, but don't overdo it. It should still be possible for somebody who didn't read the original message to understand what you're talking about. 8. Use some technique to identify which text came from the original message, and which text you add. I personally find that prepending ``> '' to the original message works best. Leaving white space after the ``> '' and leave empty lines between your text and the original text both make the result more readable. 9. Put your response in the correct place (after the text to which it replies). It's very difficult to read a thread of responses where each reply comes before the text to which it replies. 10. Most mailers change the subject line on a reply by prepending a text such as ``Re: ''. If your mailer doesn't do it automatically, you should do it manually. 11. If the submitter didn't abide by format conventions (lines too long, inappropriate subject line), please fix it. In the case of an incorrect subject line (such as ``HELP!!??''), change the subject line to (say) ``Re: Difficulties with sync PPP (was: HELP!!??)''. That way other people trying to follow the thread will have less difficulty following it. In such cases, it's appropriate to say what you did and why you did it, but try not to be rude. If you find you can't answer without being rude, don't answer. If you just want to reply to a message because of its bad format, just reply to the submitter, not to the list. You can just send him this message in reply, if you like. $Id: Howto-ask-questions,v 1.6 2005/08/10 02:21:44 grog Exp $ _______________________________________________ Thanks to Josh Paetzel for updating this document to describe mailman. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 17:02:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id 4BC9516A46E; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:02:01 +0000 (UTC) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20080118170201.4BC9516A46E@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:02:01 +0000 (UTC) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Cc: Subject: "The Complete FreeBSD": errata and addenda X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:02:01 -0000 The trouble with books is that you can't update them the way you can a web page or any other online documentation. The result is that most leading edge computer books are out of date almost before they are printed. Unfortunately, The Complete FreeBSD, published by O'Reilly, is no exception. Inevitably, a number of bugs and changes have surfaced. "The Complete FreeBSD" has been through a total of five editions, including its predecessor "Installing and Running FreeBSD". Two of these have been reprinted with corrections. I maintain a series of errata pages. Start at http://www.lemis.com/errata-4.html to find out how to get the errata information. Note also that the book has now been released for free download in PDF form. Instead of downloading the changed pages, you may prefer to download the entire book. See http://www.lemis.com/grog/Documentation/CFBSD/ for more information. Have you found a problem with the book, or maybe something confusing? Please let me know: I'm no longer constantly updating it, but I may be able to help Greg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 17:09:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C464B16A41A for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:09:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp3.utdallas.edu (smtp3.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A3313C4CC for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:09:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp3.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C8376550F for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:09:14 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:09:14 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <043D043618599C4017DE8774@utd59514.utdallas.edu> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Shell scripting kungfu X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:09:14 -0000 I need to do the following: Take a list of various strings, one of which is a quoted IP address, and extract the IPs. (Done that.) Then take the list of IPs and convert them to a list of IPs with masks on a single line. IOW, I have converted the original list to this: x.x.x.x x.x.x.x x.x.x.x x.x.x.x Now I need to remove the newlines and add /32, to the end of each IP so that I have this: x.x.x.x/32,x.x.x.x/32,x.x.x.x/32,etc. I got close with sed, but I'm not quite there. I got this: x.x.x.x/32,x.x.x.x x.x.x.x/32,x.x.x.x x.x.x.x/32,x.x.x.x Here's the code I used: cat hostlist | cut -d',' -f2 | cut -d'"' -f2 | sort | uniq | grep -v "inet" | sed '/[^*]$/N;s/\n */\/32,/' What am I missing? -- Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 17:17:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 574E916A41A for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:17:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from atxnomad@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F61B13C461 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:17:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from atxnomad@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id y2so634060uge.37 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:17:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=rauJ0fQg0kDbxJeVeJQLBUvGXaGvkXIA011ZouNnf04=; b=Ro0IIkE4gZny/Ob8GvUoRRGw9uYZFZIKkBYbXiwqL4KnmI4vdYYW1rckOxfgl+rKJ4G/QqA0KxcWY92RSBGGGmuBcLeO2WMB42liQhTOFLD3yF9omCWW2dFUnHI2im9FMjbh8zCaqpkmHZkytnoWzx2ECLRIc5X58vdaUCAIyvY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=aGyA5ObUg2xJ9yjIT6roVMpxgMievfTUO1CBer2JHeJbRF8aGbRLrG+nObu/CiT3D10s4FM0FLPFh5VmuVngdvlCuqQs8EmfgBsQVeU9o5RFeov5c05tYTZO+Q1Hzw0/omZIF0+OgQF/KguTKrGbaXhIzFxKtR8pPY/zG7kmhjw= Received: by 10.66.216.9 with SMTP id o9mr717384ugg.16.1200676633124; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:17:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.31.4 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:17:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:17:13 -0600 From: Nomad To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Upgrading network card driver on FreeBSD 6.2 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:17:16 -0000 Just recently found out that FreeBSD 6.2 doesn't have native support for my network card: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 1000Base-T (B2) It does work on machines with the B0 rev. In order to upgrade the driver, is it sufficient to replace the contents of: /usr/src/sys/dev/bce/ ?? Or are there other src files I also need to replace? While browsing one of the ftp mirrors I noticed there were 6.3-RELEASEimages available but I'm always wary of using a brand new release. Any information would be appreciated. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 17:28:33 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4091C16A419 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:28:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from unsane.co.uk (www.unsane.co.uk [85.233.185.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A70D613C4F6 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:28:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from prawn.unsane.co.uk (150.117-84-212.staticip.namesco.net [212.84.117.150]) (authenticated bits=0) by unsane.co.uk (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m0IHR82d050522 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:27:09 GMT (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Message-ID: <4790E1BB.2020001@unsane.co.uk> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:28:27 +0000 From: Vince Hoffman User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Schmehl References: <043D043618599C4017DE8774@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <043D043618599C4017DE8774@utd59514.utdallas.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Shell scripting kungfu X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:28:33 -0000 Paul Schmehl wrote: > I need to do the following: > > Take a list of various strings, one of which is a quoted IP address, and > extract the IPs. (Done that.) > > Then take the list of IPs and convert them to a list of IPs with masks > on a single line. > > IOW, I have converted the original list to this: > > x.x.x.x > x.x.x.x > x.x.x.x > x.x.x.x > > Now I need to remove the newlines and add /32, to the end of each IP so > that I have this: > x.x.x.x/32,x.x.x.x/32,x.x.x.x/32,etc. > > I got close with sed, but I'm not quite there. > > I got this: > > x.x.x.x/32,x.x.x.x > x.x.x.x/32,x.x.x.x > x.x.x.x/32,x.x.x.x > > Here's the code I used: > cat hostlist | cut -d',' -f2 | cut -d'"' -f2 | sort | uniq | grep -v > "inet" | sed '/[^*]$/N;s/\n */\/32,/' > > What am I missing? > Its a bit heavy to fireup but perl -pe 's/\n/\/32,/' hostlist should work (if you then remove the final tailing ,) Vince > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 17:32:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4659F16A420 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:32:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdq@peterk.org) Received: from poshta.pknet.net (poshta.pknet.net [216.241.167.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D1D3813C45A for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:32:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdq@peterk.org) Received: (qmail 8627 invoked by uid 98); 18 Jan 2008 17:34:05 -0000 Received: from 216.241.167.213 by poshta.pknet.net (envelope-from , uid 82) with qmail-scanner-2.01 (clamdscan: 0.91.2/5145. spamassassin: 3.2.3. Clear:RC:1(216.241.167.213):. Processed in 0.054951 secs); 18 Jan 2008 17:34:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.pknet.net) (216.241.167.213) by poshta.pknet.net with SMTP; 18 Jan 2008 17:34:04 -0000 Received: from 63.65.46.186 (SquirrelMail authenticated user fbsdq@peterk.org) by webmail.pknet.net with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:34:05 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <1354.63.65.46.186.1200677645.squirrel@webmail.pknet.net> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:34:05 -0700 (MST) From: fbsdq@peterk.org To: "Paul Schmehl" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Shell scripting kungfu X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:32:02 -0000 > I need to do the following: > > Take a list of various strings, one of which is a quoted IP address, and > extract the IPs. (Done that.) > > Then take the list of IPs and convert them to a list of IPs with masks on > a > single line. > > IOW, I have converted the original list to this: > > x.x.x.x > x.x.x.x > x.x.x.x > x.x.x.x > > Now I need to remove the newlines and add /32, to the end of each IP so > that I > have this: > x.x.x.x/32,x.x.x.x/32,x.x.x.x/32,etc. > > I got close with sed, but I'm not quite there. > > I got this: > > x.x.x.x/32,x.x.x.x > x.x.x.x/32,x.x.x.x > x.x.x.x/32,x.x.x.x > > Here's the code I used: > cat hostlist | cut -d',' -f2 | cut -d'"' -f2 | sort | uniq | grep -v > "inet" | > sed '/[^*]$/N;s/\n */\/32,/' > > What am I missing? you are missing 'tr' I guess; chernogorsk:#cat /tmp/x x.x.x.x x.x.x.x x.x.x.x x.x.x.x chernogorsk:#cat /tmp/x | sed 's/$/\/32,/g'|tr -d "\r\n" > /tmp/x2; echo >> /tmp/x2 chernogorsk:#cat /tmp/x2 x.x.x.x/32,x.x.x.x/32,x.x.x.x/32,x.x.x.x/32, some fine tunning and getting rid of the trailing ',' you can add another sed pipe, etc.etc. ]Peter[ > > > > -- > Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) > Senior Information Security Analyst > The University of Texas at Dallas > http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 18:09:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E941E16A419 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:09:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.78.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A33A313C447 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:09:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 4B90B2844C; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:51:40 -0500 (EST) To: "Nilesh Bedekar" References: From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:51:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Nilesh Bedekar's message of "Wed\, 16 Jan 2008 13\:41\:33 +0530") Message-ID: <44y7anauoj.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Installation freezes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: questions@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:09:24 -0000 "Nilesh Bedekar" writes: > I am trying to install FreeBSD 6.2 on my system with the following > configuration : > Intel Core2Duo 2.00 GHz > Intel 945 Mother Board > 1GB DDR2 Ram (Transcend) > 160 GB SATA Western Digital Hard Drive > Sony DVD-RW (IDE) > Realtek RTL 8168 10/100 On-Board Ethernet Controller > Realtek High Definition Audio (On-Board) > > When I boot using the FreeBSD_Install disc (Disc-1) the system goes to > Welcome to FreeBSD and if I let it take the default choice of 1 then it goes > through the Device Probing and then freezes at the following line > md0:Preloaded Image 4423680 bytes at a hex address. > Nothing happens after this and the system comes to a stand still. > I would be really greatful if you resolve my issue or give me any advise > that would help me to get around this issue. Have you tried letting it boot in the "safe" (I think that's what it's called...) mode? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 18:23:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7BD216A419 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:23:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+SI=fd0fe4ff@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from turtle-out.mxes.net (turtle-out.mxes.net [216.86.168.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67FE913C467 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:23:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+SI=fd0fe4ff@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by turtle-in.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE817164679 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:58:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22338D05AB for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:58:34 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:58:31 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080118175831.72929086@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <478F8980.1090301@highperformance.net> References: <478F0D5A.9090107@highperformance.net> <20080117081414.GB12470@draenor.org> <478F1049.3000706@boosten.org> <20080117083837.GC12470@draenor.org> <20080117094332.K1563@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080117090210.GD12470@draenor.org> <478F8980.1090301@highperformance.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.5; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Gutman Method on Empty Space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:23:40 -0000 On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:59:44 -0800 "Jason C. Wells" wrote: > Gutmann method might be excessive but any software that uses it shows > a seriousness about security. Gutmann himself regards the continued use of his method as "Voodoo" Gutmann's paper was about wiping the kind of disks that were being disposed of in 1996. The write patterns used in his method are specific to drives that were already out of production at the time. For drives that were in production, a few random passes are the best that can be done. His opinion now is that with modern drive technologies the chances of recovering anything useful are virtually zero. I've never heard any indication that agencies like the FBI can do it, or that commercial companies can provide such a service - at any price. If you are serious about security, one or two passes from /dev/random to the device are fine. If you are paranoid about what the NSA might be able to do, buy a pickaxe. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 18:34:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7589016A417 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:34:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-unix@embarqmail.com) Received: from mailrelay.embarq.synacor.com (mailrelay.embarq.synacor.com [208.47.184.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 235F513C447 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:34:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-unix@embarqmail.com) X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=msmEVWto3Ff5DUbb20cA:9 a=VXDBxgiI5dxMX8bhZFsA:7 a=s5-H0bo-mtW2iYCzp81oYy6HheMA:4 a=LY0hPdMaydYA:10 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp09.embarq.synacor.com smtp.mail=bsd-unix@embarqmail.com; spf=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp09.embarq.synacor.com smtp.user=rpratt1950@embarqmail.com; auth=pass (LOGIN) Received-SPF: neutral (smtp09.embarq.synacor.com: 76.6.199.167 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of embarqmail.com) Received: from [76.6.199.167] ([76.6.199.167:53788] helo=kt.weeeble.com) by mailrelay.embarq.synacor.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.1.21 r(19176)) with ESMTPA id 11/81-21205-A41F0974; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:34:51 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:34:49 -0500 From: Randy Pratt To: Paul Schmehl Message-Id: <20080118133449.8c6972b8.bsd-unix@embarqmail.com> In-Reply-To: <043D043618599C4017DE8774@utd59514.utdallas.edu> References: <043D043618599C4017DE8774@utd59514.utdallas.edu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; i386-portbld-freebsd6.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Shell scripting kungfu X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:34:52 -0000 On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:09:14 -0600 Paul Schmehl wrote: > I need to do the following: > > Take a list of various strings, one of which is a quoted IP address, and > extract the IPs. (Done that.) > > Then take the list of IPs and convert them to a list of IPs with masks on a > single line. > > IOW, I have converted the original list to this: > > x.x.x.x > x.x.x.x > x.x.x.x > x.x.x.x > > Now I need to remove the newlines and add /32, to the end of each IP so that I > have this: > x.x.x.x/32,x.x.x.x/32,x.x.x.x/32,etc. > > I got close with sed, but I'm not quite there. > > I got this: > > x.x.x.x/32,x.x.x.x > x.x.x.x/32,x.x.x.x > x.x.x.x/32,x.x.x.x > > Here's the code I used: > cat hostlist | cut -d',' -f2 | cut -d'"' -f2 | sort | uniq | grep -v "inet" | > sed '/[^*]$/N;s/\n */\/32,/' > > What am I missing? I'm sure you'll get a lot of comments on this one ;-) Here's my one-liner take: while read line; do echo -n "${line}/32,"; done < hostlist | sed 's/\,$//' or to be a bit more understandable: while read line; do echo -n "${line}/32," done < hostlist | sed 's/\,$//' the little sed part just removes the last comma from the list. HTH, Randy -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 18:35:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB80716A478 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:35:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85CE013C4E8 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:35:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A49EBC3B; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:35:03 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:35:02 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: RW Message-Id: <20080118133502.efde80a4.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20080118175831.72929086@gumby.homeunix.com.> References: <478F0D5A.9090107@highperformance.net> <20080117081414.GB12470@draenor.org> <478F1049.3000706@boosten.org> <20080117083837.GC12470@draenor.org> <20080117094332.K1563@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080117090210.GD12470@draenor.org> <478F8980.1090301@highperformance.net> <20080118175831.72929086@gumby.homeunix.com.> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gutman Method on Empty Space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:35:04 -0000 In response to RW : > On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:59:44 -0800 > "Jason C. Wells" wrote: > > > Gutmann method might be excessive but any software that uses it shows > > a seriousness about security. > > Gutmann himself regards the continued use of his method as "Voodoo" > > Gutmann's paper was about wiping the kind of disks that were being > disposed of in 1996. The write patterns used in his method are specific > to drives that were already out of production at the time. For drives > that were in production, a few random passes are the best that can be > done. His opinion now is that with modern drive technologies the chances > of recovering anything useful are virtually zero. > > I've never heard any indication that agencies like the FBI can do it, > or that commercial companies can provide such a service - at any > price. If you are serious about security, one or two passes > from /dev/random to the device are fine. If you are paranoid about what > the NSA might be able to do, buy a pickaxe. Many companies provide secure disposal services -- which generally involve dramatic physical destruction of the media. Seems to me that this the accepted approach these days. You know, they crush the drive, then burn it, then stomp on the ashes ... Of course, that only applies if you're disposing of an entire drive. If you just want to do a clean wipe of a file, rm -P is enough. There's no way for a logged in user to recover what was there before rm overwrote the file with zeros. If you're concerned about a user physically examining a disk then you have to enforce physical security, either through physically securing the device, or with HDD encryption (via geli or similar). If this is an isolated incident (i.e. you accidentally put a sensitive file on an insecure drive), I think you'll be fine if you overwrite it from /dev/random once or twice, then rm -P it. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 18:54:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2550C16A418 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:54:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from annkok2001@yahoo.com) Received: from web53310.mail.re2.yahoo.com (web53310.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.49.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6394713C459 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:54:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from annkok2001@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 36195 invoked by uid 60001); 18 Jan 2008 18:28:16 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=vUVzOFZvDMOc6YiWdmsd0PIZJ+bVVfyxKaCgwsYdHd07dfH/D0spGIcNkGh3FfY6uWVx7Dfex7BaToWL/zdLQK+n8y0Ni9iixjBic7uQsZB/wJPm4HjidCrMCnm+uwyGBo/m7Z8FxMwG4k2kruu95WGcuqHems8iaWOi1A7LTdA=; X-YMail-OSG: XIIn8EIVM1kF0.YQ9ZvZizrQcNAji6WW.Fs30ck61SHK4swfrpiSk9DFX6M2MHklhKIFDdu7ZlHy824sc3Rrh6ubibvviJBUzcwBSbcZ_hb5vMH3BJJ5rz6kdBdP1vdoG6U3fwPDztgVZpCeYaqAFA-- Received: from [66.49.254.13] by web53310.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:28:16 PST Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:28:16 -0800 (PST) From: ann kok To: fbsdq@peterk.org, Paul Schmehl In-Reply-To: <1354.63.65.46.186.1200677645.squirrel@webmail.pknet.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <174078.33010.qm@web53310.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Shell scripting kungfu X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:54:59 -0000 how about this cat file | sed 's/\/32//g' |tr -s "," "\n" --- fbsdq@peterk.org wrote: > > I need to do the following: > > > > Take a list of various strings, one of which is a > quoted IP address, and > > extract the IPs. (Done that.) > > > > Then take the list of IPs and convert them to a > list of IPs with masks on > > a > > single line. > > > > IOW, I have converted the original list to this: > > > > x.x.x.x > > x.x.x.x > > x.x.x.x > > x.x.x.x > > > > Now I need to remove the newlines and add /32, to > the end of each IP so > > that I > > have this: > > x.x.x.x/32,x.x.x.x/32,x.x.x.x/32,etc. > > > > I got close with sed, but I'm not quite there. > > > > I got this: > > > > x.x.x.x/32,x.x.x.x > > x.x.x.x/32,x.x.x.x > > x.x.x.x/32,x.x.x.x > > > > Here's the code I used: > > cat hostlist | cut -d',' -f2 | cut -d'"' -f2 | > sort | uniq | grep -v > > "inet" | > > sed '/[^*]$/N;s/\n */\/32,/' > > > > What am I missing? > you are missing 'tr' I guess; > > chernogorsk:#cat /tmp/x > x.x.x.x > x.x.x.x > x.x.x.x > x.x.x.x > chernogorsk:#cat /tmp/x | sed 's/$/\/32,/g'|tr -d > "\r\n" > /tmp/x2; echo > >> /tmp/x2 > chernogorsk:#cat /tmp/x2 > x.x.x.x/32,x.x.x.x/32,x.x.x.x/32,x.x.x.x/32, > > some fine tunning and getting rid of the trailing > ',' you can add another > sed pipe, etc.etc. > > ]Peter[ > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) > > Senior Information Security Analyst > > The University of Texas at Dallas > > http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 19:23:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4582F16A418 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:23:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1549913C46B for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:23:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0IJIaxL002858; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:18:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0IJIW8v002855; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:18:34 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:18:32 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Nomad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080118201821.X2812@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading network card driver on FreeBSD 6.2 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:23:21 -0000 > It does work on machines with the B0 rev. In order to upgrade the driver, > is it sufficient to replace the contents of: > > /usr/src/sys/dev/bce/ > > ?? Or are there other src files I also need to replace? > most probably yes. > > While browsing one of the ftp mirrors I noticed there were > 6.3-RELEASEimages available but I'm always wary of using a brand new > release. > > Any information would be appreciated. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 19:24:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F11FC16A41B for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:24:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBADE13C465 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:24:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0IJK5PI002871; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:20:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0IJK4AO002868; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:20:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:20:04 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Nomad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080118201842.Q2812@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading network card driver on FreeBSD 6.2 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:24:44 -0000 > > /usr/src/sys/dev/bce/ > > ?? Or are there other src files I also need to replace? sorry. i should say probably enough. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 20:32:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53F8F16A468 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:32:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lenzi.sergio@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECE1213C468 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:32:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lenzi.sergio@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so748327wxd.7 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:32:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=T3hoKrZtgPhYWSpj7oub3PAMLcxPCLjQi/Uf5YWFyc0=; b=pzjAAYEHTop+ofjDWfVu6yMRP5FjxRmvxtygY2O8xJqPNLQLEfhnZzIYkmnMLl7Sq1dKCZjJHPvelFwcs5AntGCpPqvWnMLP0K1MzC3y1WgsTLWSu01K7OhDG0xa6nOX5MupqPXmc+LPyXIYk+pCJbpKGuva5Hi2IHjWg/5V1Vk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; b=phxq1xYOQMYOpC9KUgzREn7FTNace0AdK4wIEi6aW4+qpwUpXzKgiVgh4xi33tA3epBrUgpjUIjEN9ro8Dd6Pu6/ZNLLj57YLsY9uSpVr2K9xrB22I+3MlbDjNpQ2R5EC9jx5uWtX4LpLiW2ZECAk47Ajjzn4sMEMlwO4GE5L3s= Received: by 10.142.107.1 with SMTP id f1mr2393078wfc.77.1200688370363; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:32:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.32.172? ( [201.47.3.162]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 8sm5708565wrl.8.2008.01.18.12.32.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:32:49 -0800 (PST) From: Sergio Lenzi To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4790F39D.8010404@chuckr.org> References: <64c038660801040516u5c42a6cpadb475ad67fb4730@mail.gmail.com> <20080104174955.52aa33fd@gumby.homeunix.com> <64c038660801041029t1a9662bayed3ca02fd46c7ece@mail.gmail.com> <64c038660801041226k1d350bc6p727e4666ea295727@mail.gmail.com> <477FFE14.1010704@monkeybrains.net> <477FFF63.50004@gmail.com> <47801D54.8050709@gmail.com> <47803E3F.2080005@monkeybrains.net> <47804901.6090007@gmail.com> <4786BF45.8030602@monkeybrains.net> <4786CEDC.3050009@chuckr.org> <20080111170711.t6wxj1bc68cgwwk4@webmail.leidinger.net> <4787E597.9040902@chuckr.org> <40077827@bb.ipt.ru> <478BC152.8060200@chuckr.org> <20080115103304.us4jtiziec44o8c0@webmail.leidinger.net> <478D09E7.5020609@chuckr.org> <07863149@bb.ipt.ru> <478D2137.1010203@chuckr.org> <41782057@bb.ipt.ru> <478E5C3F.1050301@chuckr.org> <20080117084150.q0i92yzjkskckwss@webmail.leidinger.net> <4790F39D.8010404@chuckr.org> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:31:14 +0000 Message-Id: <1200681074.51232.9.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: HOW-TO get Flash9 work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:32:52 -0000 Well... after all the endless reading... and with the weekend ahead... May I conclude that: 1) Flash 9 works as long as I relocate the libs in /compat 2) I must use version 6 of the linux libraries 3) Must use the linux firefox Am I missing something??? Will try to put all the libraries in /usr/compat/lib and try to run firefox??? Or will try to use nspluginwrapper code ???? I will ask SUN about opensolaris and flash player... I received an DVD from sun and the sistem installed without problems. seems to be as fast as a FreeBSD, with a beautifull gnome 2.20 running... It is a little bit closed, and I have not enough time to test it.. but seens very good. May be an emulation of SVR4 in ELF would solve the flash problem... Thanks for the attention, Sergio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 20:40:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7279016A473 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:40:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@nicoelro.net) Received: from smtp20.orange.fr (smtp20.orange.fr [80.12.242.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A41013C43E for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:40:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@nicoelro.net) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf2011.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id B3A561C000AD for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:40:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from orthanc.nicoelro.net (ALyon-252-1-96-122.w86-202.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.202.223.122]) by mwinf2011.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 8DD4F1C000A4 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:40:39 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20080118204039581.8DD4F1C000A4@mwinf2011.orange.fr Message-ID: <47910EC7.1030507@nicoelro.net> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:40:39 +0100 From: Nicolas Letellier User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080113) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Eclipse and FreeBSD7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nicolas@nicoelro.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:40:41 -0000 Hello, I have a problem with FreeBSD7 and the last Eclipse. It doesn't work. I have this error when I launch : JVM terminated. Exit code=1 /usr/local/bin/java -Xms40m -Xmx256m -jar /usr/local/eclipse/startup.jar -os freebsd -ws gtk -arch x86 -launcher /usr/local/eclipse/eclipse -name Eclipse -showsplash 600 -exitdata 1000b -vm /usr/local/bin/java -vmargs -Xms40m -Xmx256m -jar /usr/local/eclipse/startup.jar I saw this page (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=118115) which says that the last version has corrected the problem (3.2.2_1). But the problem is the same. The new version doesn't install jdk*. I just installed diablo. What must I do ? Nicolas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 20:47:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF5416A420 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:47:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wahjava@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CACA13C46E for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:47:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wahjava@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id l8so872143nzf.13 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:47:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; bh=W8dTrp2Pc6Sk48FWbBZDzS6Ik7NOMlSpLEixok/XsVk=; b=DJV0ZfycR74dL10F64zuvIyolOz3DpU6/wLn2krUi+YWzC4Zje170OyyWYSSU9CzelSFQOx1B3wxfQ3OjbB6lwNR9kGEAQU7mK1fvjuF5oTqoe1q0deQgFxKzrWrVeLSrJxiUegmi18gGqBfxYhESCD5TEWyR9fMX/PiJiUN6JA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=eJ4lyeTP4vVWk1TqmRjD1gjePVeM5XaKopiPsY/4BIOeCasTay5/iWrwjdBae+QnfSxqesqCFX30q85bVdB1XExnQCxqLp4r2DYvrh8Z5zog/8UVHqZtQXSHCW1SFfQRVTfqZGjDBWmCDc39TDOlDU1wSxlWioRqyXacT3prlzk= Received: by 10.142.158.17 with SMTP id g17mr2395149wfe.106.1200689262384; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:47:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.221.10 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:47:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 02:17:42 +0530 From: "=?UTF-8?Q?=E0=A4=86=E0=A4=B6=E0=A5=80=E0=A4=B7_=E0=A4=B6?= =?UTF-8?Q?=E0=A5=81=E0=A4=95=E0=A5=8D=E0=A4=B2_A?= =?UTF-8?Q?shish_Shukla?=" Sender: wahjava@gmail.com To: "FreeBSD Questions List" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: 089dadcf3851a5b9 Subject: Trying to setup a serial console on my desktop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: wahjava.ml@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:47:44 -0000 SGksCgpJJ20gdHJ5aW5nIHRvIHNldHVwIHNlcmlhbCBjb25zb2xlIG9uIG15IEZyZWVCU0QgNy4w LUJFVEE0LCBJJ20gZmFjaW5nCnNvbWUgaXNzdWVzLgoKLS0tLTg8LS0tLTg8LS0tLQpbYWJiZUBj aGF0ZWF1IH5dJCBjYXQgL2Jvb3QuY29uZmlnCi1EUApbYWJiZUBjaGF0ZWF1IH5dJCBjYXQgL2Jv b3QvbG9hZGVyLmNvbmYKc291bmRfbG9hZD0iWUVTIiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAjIERpZ2l0YWwg c291bmQgc3Vic3lzdGVtCnNuZF9oZGFfbG9hZD0iWUVTIiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIyBJbnRlbCBI aWdoIERlZmluaXRpb24gQXVkaW8gKENvbnRyb2xsZXIpCnNuZF9kczFfbG9hZD0iWUVTIiAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgIyBkczEKY29tY29uc29sZV9zcGVlZD0iMTE1MjAwIgpib290X211bHRpY29ucz0i WUVTIgpib290X3NlcmlhbD0iWUVTIgpjb25zb2xlPSJjb21jb25zb2xlLHZpZGNvbnNvbGUiICAg ICAgICAgIyBBIGNvbW1hIHNlcGFyYXRlZCBsaXN0IG9mIGNvbnNvbGUocykKW2FiYmVAY2hhdGVh dSB+XSQgY2F0IC9ldGMvdHR5cyB8Z3JlcCAtdiBeIyB8ZmdyZXAgLXYgbm9uZQp0dHl2MCAgICIv dXNyL2xpYmV4ZWMvZ2V0dHkgUGMiICAgICAgICAgY29uczI1ICBvbiAgc2VjdXJlCnR0eXYxICAg Ii91c3IvbGliZXhlYy9nZXR0eSBQYyIgICAgICAgICBjb25zMjUgIG9uICBzZWN1cmUKdHR5djIg ICAiL3Vzci9saWJleGVjL2dldHR5IFBjIiAgICAgICAgIGNvbnMyNSAgb24gIHNlY3VyZQp0dHl2 MyAgICIvdXNyL2xpYmV4ZWMvZ2V0dHkgUGMiICAgICAgICAgY29uczI1ICBvbiAgc2VjdXJlCnR0 eXY0ICAgIi91c3IvbGliZXhlYy9nZXR0eSBQYyIgICAgICAgICBjb25zMjUgIG9uICBzZWN1cmUK dHR5djUgICAiL3Vzci9saWJleGVjL2dldHR5IFBjIiAgICAgICAgIGNvbnMyNSAgb24gIHNlY3Vy ZQp0dHl2NiAgICIvdXNyL2xpYmV4ZWMvZ2V0dHkgUGMiICAgICAgICAgY29uczI1ICBvbiAgc2Vj dXJlCnR0eXY3ICAgIi91c3IvbGliZXhlYy9nZXR0eSBQYyIgICAgICAgICBjb25zMjUgIG9uICBz ZWN1cmUKdHR5djggICAiL3Vzci9sb2NhbC9iaW4veGRtIC1ub2RhZW1vbiIgIHh0ZXJtICAgb2Zm IHNlY3VyZQp0dHlkMCAgICIvdXNyL2xpYmV4ZWMvZ2V0dHkgc3RkLjExNTIwMCIgdnQyMjAgICBv biAgc2VjdXJlCnR0eWQxICAgIi91c3IvbGliZXhlYy9nZXR0eSBzdGQuOTYwMCIgICBkaWFsdXAg IG9mZiBzZWN1cmUKdHR5ZDIgICAiL3Vzci9saWJleGVjL2dldHR5IHN0ZC45NjAwIiAgIGRpYWx1 cCAgb2ZmIHNlY3VyZQp0dHlkMyAgICIvdXNyL2xpYmV4ZWMvZ2V0dHkgc3RkLjk2MDAiICAgZGlh bHVwICBvZmYgc2VjdXJlCmRjb25zICAgIi91c3IvbGliZXhlYy9nZXR0eSBzdGQuOTYwMCIgICB2 dDEwMCAgIG9mZiBzZWN1cmUKW2FiYmVAY2hhdGVhdSB+XSQgc3R0eSAtYSAtZiAvZGV2L3R0eWQw CnNwZWVkIDExNTIwMCBiYXVkOyAwIHJvd3M7IDAgY29sdW1uczsKbGZsYWdzOiBpY2Fub24gaXNp ZyBpZXh0ZW4gZWNobyBlY2hvZSAtZWNob2sgZWNob2tlIC1lY2hvbmwgZWNob2N0bAogICAgICAg IC1lY2hvcHJ0IC1hbHR3ZXJhc2UgLW5vZmxzaCAtdG9zdG9wIC1mbHVzaG8gcGVuZGluIC1ub2tl cm5pbmZvCiAgICAgICAgLWV4dHByb2MKaWZsYWdzOiAtaXN0cmlwIGljcm5sIC1pbmxjciAtaWdu Y3IgaXhvbiAtaXhvZmYgaXhhbnkgaW1heGJlbCAtaWduYnJrCiAgICAgICAgYnJraW50IC1pbnBj ayAtaWducGFyIC1wYXJtcmsKb2ZsYWdzOiBvcG9zdCBvbmxjciAtb2Nybmwgb3h0YWJzIC1vbm9j ciAtb25scmV0CmNmbGFnczogY3JlYWQgY3M4IC1wYXJlbmIgLXBhcm9kZCBodXBjbCBjbG9jYWwg LWNzdG9wYiBjcnRzY3RzIC1kc3JmbG93CiAgICAgICAgLWR0cmZsb3cgLW1kbWJ1ZgpjY2hhcnM6 IGRpc2NhcmQgPSBeTzsgZHN1c3AgPSBeWTsgZW9mID0gXkQ7IGVvbCA9IDx1bmRlZj47CiAgICAg ICAgZW9sMiA9IDx1bmRlZj47IGVyYXNlID0gXj87IGVyYXNlMiA9IF5IOyBpbnRyID0gXkM7IGtp bGwgPSBeVTsKICAgICAgICBsbmV4dCA9IF5WOyBtaW4gPSAxOyBxdWl0ID0gXlw7IHJlcHJpbnQg PSBeUjsgc3RhcnQgPSBeUTsKICAgICAgICBzdGF0dXMgPSBeVDsgc3RvcCA9IF5TOyBzdXNwID0g Xlo7IHRpbWUgPSAwOyB3ZXJhc2UgPSBeVzsKLS0tLTg8LS0tLTg8LS0tLQoKSSd2ZSBhIGRlc2t0 b3AgbW9ibyAoSW50ZWwgRDk0NUdOVEwpIHdpdGggb25ib2FyZCBJbnRlbCBHcmFwaGljcy4gTXkK QklPUyBkb2Vzbid0IHN1cHBvcnQgcmVkaXJlY3RpbmcgaXRzIG91dHB1dCB0byBDT00xLgoKRm9s bG93aW5nIGFyZSB0aGUgaXNzdWVzOgoKMS4gY29tY29uc29sZV9zcGVlZCBpbiAvYm9vdC9sb2Fk ZXIuY29uZiBpcyBub3Qgd29ya2luZy4gSSB3YW50ZWQgdG8KdHJ5IDExNTIwMCBiYXVkIHJhdGUs IGJ1dCBpdHMgbm90IHdvcmtpbmcgd2hlbiBzZXQgaW4gbG9hZGVyLmNvbmYuIElmCkkgc2V0IGNv bWNvbnNvbGVfc3BlZWQgYXQKbG9hZGVyIHByb21wdCwgaXQgd29ya3MuCgoyLiBLZXlib2FyZCBk b2Vzbid0IHdvcmsgaXJyZXNwZWN0aXZlIG9mICctUCcgYmVpbmcgcHJlc2VudCBpbgovYm9vdC5j b25maWcgLiBTbyBJIGNhbid0IGxvZ2luIHRvIGFueSBUVFkgb3IgbG9naW4gdG8gWCB2aWEgR0RN LgoKSSdtIGZvbGxvd2luZyBodHRwOi8vd3d3LmZyZWVic2Qub3JnL2RvYy9lbl9VUy5JU084ODU5 LTEvYm9va3MvaGFuZGJvb2svc2VyaWFsY29uc29sZS1zZXR1cC5odG1sCi4KClRJQQotLSAKQXNo aXNoIFNodWtsYSDgpIbgpLbgpYDgpLcg4KS24KWB4KSV4KWN4KSyICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgIGh0dHA6Ly93YWhqYXZhLndvcmRwcmVzcy5jb20vCsK3LS0gwrctIMK3wrfCt8K3IMK3LS0t IMK3LSDCt8K3wrctIMK3LSDCty0twrctwrcgLS3CtyAtLSDCty0gwrfCtyDCty3Ct8K3IMK3LcK3 LcK3LSAtwrctwrcgLS0tIC0tCg== From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 21:40:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A5916A421 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:40:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wahjava@gmail.com) Received: from ag-out-0708.google.com (ag-out-0708.google.com [72.14.246.247]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C35313C46A for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:40:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wahjava@gmail.com) Received: by ag-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id 31so650423aga.3 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:40:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:to:cc:subject:x-face:references:x-pgp-fp:x-pgp:x-mailer:x-attribution:pgp:organization:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:face:mime-version:content-type:sender; bh=hIJf5xwJLNr/q4X7m6tm4m+31e9fw9sNKwZnARfAu/I=; b=qE4FAucwovr9KjGhm72dZxxoTfdlsjRgfsy/UTaOSGGLj/GUBLi9MTwZ43q2DRT839Kzl5Y9ugPLfTr/0W1cgKtXCEU8ahzAEBuJnVw5uWgTLrIag46CrQBCetdNGtY+ffaJTkYPTkJl0r5f6ECeJNmh4ZliY0GotZ0sELwlqFs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=to:cc:subject:x-face:references:x-pgp-fp:x-pgp:x-mailer:x-attribution:pgp:organization:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:face:mime-version:content-type:sender; b=H0rZ/QOIvx+hi/YjMPNHRxJT5oPyrnZBUXsyADAicPAIFww0R9zmR3qBjG1NaIMkIWp4vp8QaHXtKyzFcz9Pgers9pHOn4aSgO6Qh7ENd+CLpGlxF425xaajtX9D1FfjLBN9+gIqax3anNAZ/1TrLdjuMklzodAXn1Mk/LDRB6I= Received: by 10.100.171.10 with SMTP id t10mr8042663ane.94.1200692435304; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:40:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from chateau.d.lf ( [122.162.237.78]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 30sm3944441hso.14.2008.01.18.13.40.32 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:40:34 -0800 (PST) To: Ewald Jenisch X-Face: "\:nMpJ)EA!j>2nEu-[(+&o:N+CtL^AS\, Jv*LO5qBr#W2.\=d X-PGP-FP: 1E00 4679 77E4 F8EE 2E4B 56F2 1F2F 8410 762E 5E74 X-PGP: 762E5E74 X-Mailer: Gnus/5.11 (Oort 5.11) Emacs/22.1.50.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Attribution: =?utf-8?B?4KSG4KS24KWA4KS3?= PGP: 762E5E74 Organization: /\/0/\/3 From: wahjava.ml@gmail.com (Ashish Shukla =?utf-8?B?4KSG4KS24KWA4KS3IA==?= =?utf-8?B?4KS24KWB4KSV4KWN4KSy?=) Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 03:10:38 +0530 In-Reply-To: <20080118150214.GA3092@aurora.oekb.co.at> (Ewald Jenisch's message of "Fri\, 18 Jan 2008 16\:02\:14 +0100") Message-ID: <87r6geke21.fsf@chateau.d.lf> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEVfX1/8/PwTExMDAwO0 tLSampr////f398oKCi/v78MDAwICAihq32EAAACU0lEQVQ4jW3UvWvbQBQA8LOJsJIsOajtZAtH Aqq8FLQUvNjhCex2UYpE7XYytPJalxJnFMImqrOkIJfcZtwGgrqEhELQ/XN9p+jLbc+Drfvx7r17 9jNxszXCV2mR9P3ACoKAOM5bugn1hRBRFAnxeErLMN4RIpbwYKwmZfgkMGDNol8PhlFrFDDalQcx BMMwXpwV8KElYqYzpmOA0a4UsC/EmrEU4ptGDq9kghTabP09g9EuFiSpJQOYXslgrEd6Aj8Q7pl+ kcFH3NRlUTIFfvyZwV4sEzwV20a4y2A/BWEYLxdYwk0Gn+Mohfa2X4bXsn8StC0uYdVI4T02cK0F is15ArcZYKeER5Q+f4JofZZHiPshJPt8BwtPrp4kF+KOp+sdpjvOjqpf3n+1bD6dTjk3ySKuZVU1 ezcdpm3h/pL4h9eP3Rw6R5bqa9t86a/1W3OVd7dpzgBMx8YAxVFgvgmqDTwEdQignOVgI1ggoQMA x40CFHzmCHgXcEoAig39MOSATTGt5znQL4qDIRIgNK2LAqYWAl47lBGDSgHNjoOt6vdDkNAtQc9E wN0EJgXQN7aMSABIGU7mMiI5CtQJzX9w9PwQYOApVqBwCMqwp9lmkKzh0qM5uPTAn/Vw0ogazK9m JRjR6pHqEVyqd1XbgPPfKkgAddClxRi49NmKcNMh+JV4T7mzqW1e2jwk3pAPjugGuCfHPLRIP/Qr tLEB9daW7HrvcLIx55i/9zjkfMlO//pnwLHyPcupzrL9AtxrFgTaN/dfGFcjreb+B9wmnzaKpz8p dKsBFjzeRQAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: =?UTF-8?B?4KSG4KS24KWA4KS3IOCktuClgeCkleCljeCksg==?= Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anycast DNS - anybody? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:40:37 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> Regarding Anycast DNS - anybody?; Ewald Jenisch adds: Ewald> Hi, Ewald> Has anybody out there configured anycast DNS (where multiple ins= tances Ewald> of a DNS-server run under the same IP-address in different parts= of Ewald> the network) under FreeBSD? AFAIK, anycast requires magic at routing level. So that user will connect to the nearest DNS server (holding the anycast address). Ewald> I'm looking for some hints to get started, but googling around d= idn't Ewald> provide much info on that topic... It has do with routing so you need to investigate on routing protocols, like RIP, etc. 192.168.1.1 10.0.0.1 network 10.0.0.2 192.168.1.1 [server1] --- [router1] =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D [router2] --- [server2] router1, router2 -- redundant routers connecting to different ISPs So if router2 receives packet destined for 192.168.1.1, instead of sending = to server1 it'll send it to server2, since server2 is nearest to it, and vice versa. Above is a very simple configuration describing anycast. Since Anycast works only for connection-less protocols, you don't need to keep TCP connections synchronized between two servers, although both ser= vers should behave identically, i.e. return similar records. BtW, I've never implemented anycast ever, so its fully based on my imaginat= ion. HTH =2D-=20 Ashish Shukla =E0=A4=86=E0=A4=B6=E0=A5=80=E0=A4=B7 =E0=A4=B6=E0=A5=81=E0=A4= =95=E0=A5=8D=E0=A4=B2 http://wahjava.wordpress.com/ =C2=B7-- =C2=B7- =C2=B7=C2=B7=C2=B7=C2=B7 =C2=B7--- =C2=B7- =C2=B7=C2=B7=C2= =B7- =C2=B7- =C2=B7--=C2=B7-=C2=B7 --=C2=B7 -- =C2=B7- =C2=B7=C2=B7 =C2=B7-= =C2=B7=C2=B7 =C2=B7-=C2=B7-=C2=B7- -=C2=B7-=C2=B7 --- -- --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHkRzaHy+EEHYuXnQRAhtVAKDWqY4wtfpFW3BdYa55w7zsoAg7sACgvu4F U62oTUxRGhXcQn8WABZPQLc= =kUly -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 21:41:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D6516A41B for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:41:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perlcat@alltel.net) Received: from ispmxmta06-srv.windstream.net (ispmxmta06-srv.windstream.net [166.102.165.167]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33FC813C455 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:41:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perlcat@alltel.net) Received: from ispmxaamta04-gx.windstream.net ([72.37.126.77]) by ispmxmta09-srv.windstream.net with ESMTP id <20080118212510.EPJF8692.ispmxmta09-srv.windstream.net@ispmxaamta04-gx.windstream.net> for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:25:10 -0600 Received: from ext-b14-077.omhq.uprr.com ([72.37.126.77]) by ispmxaamta04-gx.windstream.net with ESMTP id <20080118212510.TWCA7087.ispmxaamta04-gx.windstream.net@ext-b14-077.omhq.uprr.com> for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:25:10 -0600 From: perlcat Organization: dis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:21:47 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801181521.47956.perlcat@alltel.net> Subject: bind: Can't assign requested address using ssh (or anything else) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:41:45 -0000 Trying to access a vpn using ssh on 6.2 - STABLE. Haven't found an answer anywhere, and so I must be totally missing the right questions to ask or configurations to look at. This problem is consistent regardless of port chosen or access method. I can duplicate at will with ssh. Here's the command that fails: $ ssh -X -N -L 127.0.0.3:13390:192.168.1.44:3390 tyson@xx.xx.xx.xx tyson@xx.xx.xx.xx's password: bind: Can't assign requested address channel_setup_fwd_listener: cannot listen to port: 13390 Could not request local forwarding. I know that it can be done -- the guy next to me is working using Linux, but his answer to this issue was to edit the /etc/network/interfaces file. He figures that I didn't have one or don't have the loopback started. (his interfaces file): ~$ more /etc/network/interfaces auto lo iface lo inet loopback address 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 Here's my config info: ====================================== ifconfig output: smedley# ifconfig fwe0: flags=108802 mtu 1500 options=8 ether 02:e0:b8:02:9c:8e ch 1 dma -1 lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 ath0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 72.37.126.77 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 72.37.126.255 ether 00:13:f7:35:39:5e media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (OFDM/18Mbps) status: associated ssid UPRR_X channel 8 bssid 00:0f:90:7b:60:00 authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpowmax 36 bmiss 7 protmode CTS burst bintval 100 ====================================== rc.conf: hostname="smedley.alltel.net" ifconfig_ath0="DHCP" inetd_enable="YES" keymap="us.iso" moused_enable="YES" linux_enable="YES" sshd_enable="YES" tcp_extensions="YES" usbd_enable="YES" nfs_client_enable="YES" cupsd_enable="YES" smartd_enable="YES" ====================================== Maybe I need to get rid if the inet6 for the loopback? Thanks! Tyson From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 22:17:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B183F16A418 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:17:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BEB413C455 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:17:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b2so132099nfb.33 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:17:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=z3ExUMbVZaZlpaPmhphsJHwQPwpcbwgMBuzx3euBG1w=; b=BJnqbpMZPZTNI4GerWBORxG8SopYlkOfLF7vYwsoVKrtQIqDkR2V037vTkKea7szrYaNcQ9941eb8wIDtKXUeQWP3m3MFWpaWnIKg5miWgOBNDwJUzOwCTpMn9zhUf9riXFXOogxSHpCDGuQetePkv9OUvXqw1hQxk9LdaC+QkM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Zb0b1nujiqTPjACetmCQ+QTq9vBSK8AX1T6ECP7xA4hny+Eb2eswBxxLy9cwdp01nO6t9GDRudJn//YccMstTG0MBR8FOu9RE0lb+381RVBbjW5md0gOfDZY5+3mfncEmt6fUozwVBd/WVUrd1kJEflZJNu5bqmJ8mVXQSVJFq0= Received: by 10.78.131.8 with SMTP id e8mr5727395hud.1.1200694665312; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:17:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.130.5 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:17:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <94136a2c0801181417w395f7532w4761fc76388ed60@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:17:45 +0100 From: "Zbigniew Szalbot" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: going from 6.2 to 6.3 and custom kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:17:47 -0000 Hello, I thought I would try to upgrade from 6.2 to 6.2-Release now that it is officially avilable. However, I do have custom kernel on my machine. And when using advice written by Colin (thanks!) http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2007-11-10-freebsd-minor-version-upgrade.html I get this warning: WARNING: This system is running a "szalbot" kernel, which is not a kernel configuration distributed as part of FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE. This kernel will not be updated: you MUST update the kernel manually before running "freebsd-update.sh install". How do I update the kernel manually then? Do I have to fetch the latest source and then follow the advice given here? http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-building.html Thanks! Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 22:25:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0008616A41B for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:25:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from colin.brace@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.154]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 785DF13C457 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:25:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from colin.brace@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so1364879fgg.35 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:25:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=iI+KIv0mmDZHsgtOj562eo0Bqg1zW6QuIclHv61NnS4=; b=nOwIKW/ZPLNCm0DhTBP188gD9ubWHZqX2oU9ypMjr6dQp2WBxFmeDydzorlA4m4QDMP/EoUVFbe1qCDMneb7UOm0nmEcOSewwDsogukgDUUTbxI/PkPYJXdnelSqamd7wWvA4CG4n9y/UOkgj/IDUhsQg7DcJMJyjYEOoTAwwSc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=iADrcLf1UP/EgxzESBJwADEqa2e57+bOAw+pyijBYtkFqkDDyo/prHGfEUaCLqeL0YCEtto4uc3LI13i/whgIsEc5ZvWl4bPqJPf9VOKYYt0O8yEj8z56X1GEaBZjwerwknh892MVt2Cr00Abfqhjx8ufOsh8IpfbHx8Bl5/II8= Received: by 10.82.107.15 with SMTP id f15mr6963800buc.0.1200695116527; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:25:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.108.2 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:25:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:25:16 +0100 From: "Colin Brace" Sender: colin.brace@gmail.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20080118092711.t7725zf7xckwswck@newwebmail.jnielsen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <94136a2c0801180110v2e43ea2esc96393c4c3ca56f@mail.gmail.com> <47907A2B.601@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk> <20080118092711.t7725zf7xckwswck@newwebmail.jnielsen.net> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2ec482b9196dc2cc Subject: Re: FBSD or PCBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:25:19 -0000 On Jan 18, 2008 3:27 PM, John Nielsen wrote: > Quoting Robin Becker : > > I have had great success using PCBSD on various acers, I eventually > > got fed up with it being not quite identical to FreeBSD and I now > > have FreeBSD 6.2 on my current acer laptop (a 1680). > I was unable to even boot my Wife's Acer (an Aspire 5520) with FreeBSD > 6.3-pre or 7.0-pre. I'm also pretty sure the Acer wireless is NOT > supported by any native drivers; FWIW, my Acer Aspire 5500Z has Intel 2200 wireless chipset which is supported by FreeBSD and runs FreeBSD and PC-BSD fine. Sounds like Acer laptops don't all have the same wireless NIC... -- Colin Brace Amsterdam http://lim.nl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 22:40:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC1716A417 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:40:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from rosebud.otenet.gr (rosebud.otenet.gr [195.170.0.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5ED713C469 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:40:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from [192.168.0.1] (athedsl-318563.home.otenet.gr [85.72.100.1]) by rosebud.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m0IMeJDw026038; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 00:40:19 +0200 Message-ID: <47912AE1.6000603@otenet.gr> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 00:40:33 +0200 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zbigniew Szalbot References: <94136a2c0801181417w395f7532w4761fc76388ed60@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <94136a2c0801181417w395f7532w4761fc76388ed60@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: going from 6.2 to 6.3 and custom kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:40:22 -0000 Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > Hello, > > I thought I would try to upgrade from 6.2 to 6.2-Release now that it > is officially avilable. However, I do have custom kernel on my > machine. And when using advice written by Colin (thanks!) > http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2007-11-10-freebsd-minor-version-upgrade.html > I get this warning: > > WARNING: This system is running a "szalbot" kernel, which is not a > kernel configuration distributed as part of FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE. > This kernel will not be updated: you MUST update the kernel manually > before running "freebsd-update.sh install". > > How do I update the kernel manually then? > > Do I have to fetch the latest source and then follow the advice given here? > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-building.html > > Thanks! > > Zbigniew Szalbot > > It will not update your kernel, but if you do freebsd-update install you will get an updated GENERIC kernel in /boot/GENERIC. This is what I did: freebsd-update -r 6.3-RELEASE upgrade (got the warning you mentioned) freebsd-update install Got a message about installing kernel updates. Got a new generic kernel in /boot/GENERIC (check to see this exists!) Depending on whether you have console access to the machine or not: 1. If you don't have console access (you are doing this remotely), mv /boot/kernel /boot/mykernel.old and mv /boot/GENERIC /boot/kernel and reboot. This is because you can't (normally) interrupt the loader remotely - unless someone does it for you. Continue from step 3. 2. If you are in front of the machine, reboot. Stop the boot sequence when the boot loader comes up, and escape to loader prompt. Type: unload load /boot/GENERIC/kernel boot 3. You are now running a 6.3-RELEASE kernel, albeit a GENERIC one. Run freebsd-update install again to install the rest of the system. 4. Recompile your custom kernel the usual way, i.e. make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL make installkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL reboot 5. You are done! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 22:58:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0582E16A419 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:58:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: from chen.org.nz (chen.org.nz [202.89.146.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1BBF13C447 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:58:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 812E6284D2; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 11:58:07 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 11:58:07 +1300 From: Jonathan Chen To: Nicolas Letellier Message-ID: <20080118225807.GA87703@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: <47910EC7.1030507@nicoelro.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47910EC7.1030507@nicoelro.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Eclipse and FreeBSD7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:58:09 -0000 On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 09:40:39PM +0100, Nicolas Letellier wrote: [...] > I saw this page (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=118115) > which says that the last version has corrected the problem (3.2.2_1). > But the problem is the same. The new version doesn't install jdk*. > I just installed diablo. Eclipse will only work with the native-jdk. Use your installed diablo-jdk to build the native-jdk, and then remove the diablo-jdk. -- Jonathan Chen ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "One, with God, is always a majority, but many a martyr has been burned at the stake while the votes were being counted." -- Thomas B. Reed From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 23:16:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9C4C16A420 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:16:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from benw04@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A453213C4D9 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:15:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from benw04@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l15so1080376rvb.43 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:15:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=t0Q7rhJAInvMWL/rNvsON6AMF71Nzzys+5T6qRGa9ig=; b=dwA0f9wwdJC54CKkh4Ee8gTeC2y6TDZWjtx86J7DZD8TPv9mms4+v8jnhfbKyKzXCMXEcqL+s0XT5iIg5Tjl307LXk0cMmY/17VHm68nKYILGXDVZr1RsuItOV4BaND2nP/2THs0ib/z3x+MCM3iCf0WP/6HLsemwcl4+DkbUcw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=wXocEpMrrtv0+syAsxfSi0qQaPGlCDbqvZidK8ebl1Oc82Bjr0KrD8RU4PoiGcMG4hoPZ9gyksIENnZMl1iG70INsdR2lmp6+H5ihwBWIYDuV1XwyQjBGLTnQWGb3rzWnuM5LkeZB/VecbAddB/qeJ0fSMR6z/X9TrZVSslzjZ8= Received: by 10.141.141.3 with SMTP id t3mr2768777rvn.226.1200698159313; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:15:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.5? ( [121.45.47.39]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 3sm2277806rvi.14.2008.01.18.15.15.57 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:15:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <47913325.7000903@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:45:49 +1030 From: Ben Williams User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <47909C4D.8030500@iugo.com.au> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: fsck_msdosfs failing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:16:00 -0000 illoai@gmail.com wrote: > On 18/01/2008, Ben Williams wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I've got a problem with fsck_msdosfs. My FAT32 drive came up with errors >> after a power-failure-induced reboot, and recommended that I run >> fsck_msdosfs manually. However, fsck_msdosfs fails: >> >> # fsck_msdosfs /dev/ad3s1 >> ** /dev/ad3s1 >> ** Phase 1 - Read and Compare FATs >> No space for FAT (Cannot allocate memory)# >> >> I've tried googling for it and I can't find anything other than a bug >> being mentioned/filed for netbsd which is obviously related, but no fix >> was forthcoming. >> >> Does anyone have any ideas how I can proceed? > > Are you still in single user mode at this point? Well, I was. I have made a tiny bit of progress - I edited /etc/fstab and turned the fsck at boot time off for that drive, so I can boot normally now, just without that drive mounted. However, I still get the same error message from fsck_msdosfs. I am able to run top at the same time, as as far as I can tell, it doesn't actually run out of memory - Mem has ~564k free, and Swap has 158mb free at its lowest when fsck_msdosfs is running. It's an old machine, with 192mb ram, and 359mb swap. - Ben From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 23:35:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB64E16A417 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:35:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF1113C447 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:34:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0INX7ob005241; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 00:33:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0INWoHX005231; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 00:33:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 00:32:50 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Ben Williams In-Reply-To: <47913325.7000903@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080119003216.Y5183@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <47909C4D.8030500@iugo.com.au> <47913325.7000903@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fsck_msdosfs failing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:35:34 -0000 > fsck_msdosfs. > > I am able to run top at the same time, as as far as I can tell, it doesn't > actually run out of memory - Mem has ~564k free, and Swap has 158mb free at > its lowest when fsck_msdosfs is running. It's an old machine, with 192mb ram, > and 359mb swap. but ulimit's defaults possibly limit memory... check ulimit -a From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 23:47:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9DEE16A420 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:47:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from benw04@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0961B13C474 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:47:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from benw04@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l15so1086825rvb.43 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:47:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+YSi+CFHHOGod/KmA7jg6N8/hdp0js3NUjz0NRPiNiI=; b=emIu8zA+jK50b2XGuaIF+yM+oIRDhls4TFSkUFqQCNASpvU6ZffWZI2KX6+7ueybmuRwYs4d/zQkyKyPRnaMjVPSCXVA9EocupfJ4yeXIiW9t52vMhDn1HA+c4c8XJlRYoM+/l2KOBi7ycMYs3p2OE/M0ujUu8Q/065pdD2vgNQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=COM+gAe4qkycbZsmmUiBZAS9C3EVknEhcEKvTozNhw5CTHzsiydnRgVYvtO0VEz4IkeorBYoTbIKaWiv8wb+0Kt6EjcFx4rUrQ3iMLyx1RBBXTLQAerVTconO+1itHGy6NArpg80yRX+5QOzMwarTpBk8taJ9vXpt+H/RAqWcCU= Received: by 10.140.208.14 with SMTP id f14mr2781452rvg.283.1200700071300; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:47:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.4? ( [121.45.47.39]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b39sm286015rvf.8.2008.01.18.15.47.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:47:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <47913AA3.8080108@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:17:47 +1030 From: Ben Williams User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <47909C4D.8030500@iugo.com.au> <47913325.7000903@gmail.com> <20080119003216.Y5183@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20080119003216.Y5183@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: fsck_msdosfs failing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:47:52 -0000 Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> fsck_msdosfs. >> >> I am able to run top at the same time, as as far as I can tell, it >> doesn't actually run out of memory - Mem has ~564k free, and Swap has >> 158mb free at its lowest when fsck_msdosfs is running. It's an old >> machine, with 192mb ram, and 359mb swap. > > but ulimit's defaults possibly limit memory... > check ulimit -a [ben@roma ~]$ ulimit -a core file size (blocks, -c) unlimited data seg size (kbytes, -d) 524288 file size (blocks, -f) unlimited max locked memory (kbytes, -l) unlimited max memory size (kbytes, -m) unlimited open files (-n) 2656 pipe size (512 bytes, -p) 1 stack size (kbytes, -s) 65536 cpu time (seconds, -t) unlimited max user processes (-u) 1328 virtual memory (kbytes, -v) unlimited [ben@roma ~]$ - Ben From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 00:01:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06CC716A418 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 00:01:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from four.harrisons@virgin.net) Received: from n068.sc1.he.tucows.com (smtpout0181.sc1.he.tucows.com [64.97.136.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C917213C46B for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 00:01:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from four.harrisons@virgin.net) Received: from sc1-out03.emaildefenseservice.com (64.97.139.2) by n068.sc1.he.tucows.com (7.2.069.1) id 4769316E0074F9F5 for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:32:50 +0000 X-SpamScore: 2 X-Spamcatcher-Summary: 2, 0, 0, 00d649fd5de354aa, ac80556619e0e5c4, four.harrisons@virgin.net, -, RULES_HIT:355:379:946:947:966:973:981:988:989:1260:1261:1277:1312:1313:1314:1345:1437:1516:1518:1519:1534:1540:1593:1594:1595:1596:1711:1730:1747:1766:1792:2196:2199:2393:2559:2562:2895:3352:3865:3866:3867:3868:3869:3871:3872:3874:4250:4362:4385:5007:6119:6261, 0, RBL:none, CacheIP:none, Bayesian:0.5, 0.5, 0.5, Netcheck:none, DomainCache:0, MSF:not bulk, SPF:, MSBL:none, DNSBL:none X-Spamcatcher-Explanation: Received: from desktop.piggybox (unknown [64.97.206.40]) by sc1-out03.emaildefenseservice.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:32:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from desktop.piggybox (localhost.piggybox [127.0.0.1]) by desktop.piggybox (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0INWb1A001083 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:32:42 GMT (envelope-from peter@desktop.piggybox) Received: (from peter@localhost) by desktop.piggybox (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m0INWbjB001082 for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:32:37 GMT (envelope-from peter) Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:32:37 +0000 From: peter harrison To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080118233237.GA1069@desktop.piggybox> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Subject: Build server for ports and world... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 00:01:39 -0000 I'd like to set up a build server at home to save me time when running portupgrade and building world. I've read the handbook on this, and I'm happy with the process of NFS mounting /usr/src /usr/obj and /usr/ports etc.. I've two questions though. First, my home server currently runs 6.2-RELEASE - I update it using freebsd-update and it doesn't have the source for world & kernel. Is it possible to put the 7.0 source on this and build for installation on my desktop, or do I need to take the server to 7.0 before I do this? Second, is there anyway of building packages without installing them? I'm not keen to put X and all my desktop gubbins on the server when I only need it to build the packages. Thanks for any help. Peter Harrison. -- "`That young girl is one of the least benightedly unintelligent organic life forms it has been my profound lack of pleasure not to be able to avoid meeting.'" - Marvin's first ever compliment about anybody. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 00:08:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB2B216A417 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 00:08:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) Received: from darklight.org.ru (darklight.org.ru [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:81::dead:c0de]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41CD913C457 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 00:08:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) Received: from darklight.org.ru (yuri@darklight.org.ru [IPv6:::1]) by darklight.org.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0J07s0G022737; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 03:07:55 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) Received: (from yuri@localhost) by darklight.org.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m0J07sWe022736; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 03:07:54 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: darklight.org.ru: yuri set sender to yuri.pankov@gmail.com using -f Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 03:07:54 +0300 From: Yuri Pankov To: peter harrison Message-ID: <20080119000754.GD24750@darklight.org.ru> References: <20080118233237.GA1069@desktop.piggybox> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080118233237.GA1069@desktop.piggybox> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Build server for ports and world... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 00:08:03 -0000 On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 11:32:37PM +0000, peter harrison wrote: > I'd like to set up a build server at home to save me time when running portupgrade and building world. > > I've read the handbook on this, and I'm happy with the process of NFS mounting /usr/src /usr/obj and /usr/ports etc.. > > I've two questions though. > > First, my home server currently runs 6.2-RELEASE - I update it using freebsd-update and it doesn't have the source for world & kernel. > Is it possible to put the 7.0 source on this and build for installation on my desktop, or do I need to take the server to 7.0 before I do this? Yes, it should be possible. > Second, is there anyway of building packages without installing them? > I'm not keen to put X and all my desktop gubbins on the server when I only need it to build the packages. Look at ports-mgmt/tinderbox, does exactly what you want :-) > Thanks for any help. > > > Peter Harrison. > -- > "`That young girl is one of the least benightedly > unintelligent organic life forms it has been my profound > lack of pleasure not to be able to avoid meeting.'" > > - Marvin's first ever compliment about anybody. HTH, Yuri From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 01:48:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA9616A418 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:48:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com) Received: from web32710.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web32710.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.207.254]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0037A13C43E for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:48:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 64699 invoked by uid 60001); 19 Jan 2008 01:22:00 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=mdf/mZb3wf9VPAcLuZFjAWorM62mEAiOX/FCKN6Mw3oZ/wG3sKkfNKk/RCn8I67jHVY0jkfunqMclIMAdyCA3ioAh73y7hCqxuBJPOqPIjxwTh/PMj0dm90tcwG2hKOlOqKn4cKWLtwF6eCj6QjQ0afO6MVLrNRq+DavVv0lyXo=; X-YMail-OSG: 0Q2P6rUVM1lDy2ysizapTpnUSp1iuQlA5ggUajDnBw114OohgMjNCLibyAuOYt0sltoSST6CHHVL_W3ApVwxmsF2orM54ILveIjmbKSBn4QEDfaNyZvdgWrC9vsC4w-- Received: from [190.157.121.205] by web32710.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 02:22:00 CET Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 02:22:00 +0100 (CET) From: To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <182015.63912.qm@web32710.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Cc: Subject: relocation and USB keyboards X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:48:42 -0000 Hi guys; I moved my computer to another room and in the process I unplugged all the USB devices. After pluging everything again my USB keyboard doesn't respond unless I start in single user mode first. I tried changing the keyboard to all the other USB slots with no luck. Any idea what is going on? FWIW, this is and amd64x2 running 6.3-RC2. cheers, Pedro. ___________________________________ L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo! Mail: http://it.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 02:02:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3200416A41B for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 02:02:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from outbound-mail-17.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-17.bluehost.com [69.89.20.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DFE2813C44B for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 02:02:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 4331 invoked by uid 0); 19 Jan 2008 02:02:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box183.bluehost.com) (69.89.25.183) by mailproxy1.bluehost.com with SMTP; 19 Jan 2008 02:02:25 -0000 Received: from c-24-9-123-251.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.9.123.251] helo=demeter.hydra) by box183.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JG32P-0004l0-9Y for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:02:25 -0700 Received: by demeter.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:02:23 -0700 Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:02:23 -0700 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd general questions Message-ID: <20080119020223.GE63533@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd general questions References: <478F0D5A.9090107@highperformance.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <478F0D5A.9090107@highperformance.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {737:box183.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.com} {sentby:smtp auth 24.9.123.251 authed with perrin@apotheon.com} Subject: Re: Gutman Method on Empty Space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 02:02:26 -0000 On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 12:10:02AM -0800, Jason C. Wells wrote: > Can anyone recommend a utility for the secure overwriting of unused disc > space? I am a satisfied customer of "Eraser" for Windows. I'm looking > for the same thing for FreeBSD. Have you looked into the `shred` utility (gshred on FreeBSD)? http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=388 -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] Kent Beck: "I always knew that one day Smalltalk would replace Java. I just didn't know it would be called Ruby." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 03:51:44 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F6C216A417 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 03:51:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53DCD13C442 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 03:51:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so2131752waf.3 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:51:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=0IY6rH/Q3/FFF1yrQDBFJbtWsT4P0LSSjrKDdcToRQ4=; b=U6CwSDkBeuDViOAi+WdT1498HQ6br4GnObdX89bLWJZljRq5jTDJ7tuMplFIv9rI305+F4ER7J2URYZa2Lay117bESswejOR/C6VGxylzITLhZnTBziWufCecMES6U2qG2GtN1eRGP//Zcyjy/anTOiPvjcWlIIuJ0+kGL10Wpo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=ZNbvHtge6cOiuuU0dtzMy3fQ20RxiP+BZyaHWcw9aNMkggHoLsZpj/NEWf4vzFSoXQwvXKRCfDFwvQuJQ4NhNRImAzOjh+QpmeCw03WZCJAY4NJxneXek4Srijfi7ATCtYQV2U6jQWHk+GG97y3lV5vozCXpugEI1ilfy6eFR9k= Received: by 10.114.176.1 with SMTP id y1mr1277714wae.86.1200714703502; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:51:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from sniper ( [71.221.189.14]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j28sm6609663waf.36.2008.01.18.19.51.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:51:42 -0800 (PST) From: Andrew Falanga To: FreeBSD Questions Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:51:28 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801182051.28869.af300wsm@gmail.com> Subject: KDE won't allow me to logout and restart kdm after upgrade to xorg 7.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 03:51:44 -0000 Hi, About two months ago (yes, I'm only now getting around to fixing this), I decided it was time to upgrade my Xorg install from 6.9 to the current. I followed the instructions in /usr/ports/UPDATING from 20070519. After the upgrade, everything was going ok, until I logged out of KDE. I ended the session and was redirected to ttyv0. The following was on the system console: Jan 18 20:22:36 sniper kdm-bin[788]: X server for display :0 terminated unexpectedly Jan 18 20:22:36 sniper kdm-bin: :0[948]: IO Error in XOpenDisplay Jan 18 20:22:36 sniper kdm-bin[788]: Display :0 cannot be opened Jan 18 20:22:36 sniper kdm-bin[788]: Unable to fire up local display :0; disabling. I then went to another console and, as root, did: sniper# sockstat | grep x root kdm-bin 788 9 stream /var/run/xdmctl/dmctl/socket Which cleared out whatever was wrong and restarted kdm-bin and allowed me to start another session. What exactly is going on here? The reason it isn't too big a deal, and took me until now to mention it is because I'm about the only person who uses FreeBSD here at home and so when I logout, it's usually to shut off the computer. Any thoughts on how to fix this? Andy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 04:48:44 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D37FD16A419; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 04:48:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gad@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp6.server.rpi.edu (smtp6.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC5613C4E3; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 04:48:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gad@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp6.server.rpi.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m0J3fToT021926; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:41:30 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20080102141419.GB61289@sandvine.com> References: <972994690801011020u60ed0a0et6d8356cdb1f6f974@mail.gmail.com> <20080102141419.GB61289@sandvine.com> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:41:28 -0500 To: Ed Maste , James Jeffery From: Garance A Drosehn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-RPI-SA-Score: undef - spam scanning disabled X-CanItPRO-Stream: default X-Canit-Stats-ID: Bayes signature not available X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 128.113.2.226 Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Asus eee (was Re: G4 Quicksilver as Web Server?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 04:48:44 -0000 At 9:14 AM -0500 1/2/08, Ed Maste wrote: >On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 06:20:22PM +0000, James Jeffery wrote: > >> Before i end the toipic, anyone got any feeback on the Asus Eee (mini >> laptops) with FreeBSD? > >It works, but no drivers exist for the wireless or wired Ethernet ports. >The wireless is a newer Atheros part and ath(4) should gain support for >it, but I have no idea what the timeline will be. The wired Ethernet >is an Atheros (formerly Attansic) L2 10/100, and I'm not aware of any >concrete plans for a driver for it. > >I've used a Linksys USB200M USB ethernet (axe(4) driver) with mine and >that works well. One of the guys I know is running FreeBSD on the Eee, and has written up the following information for anyone who is interested in doing what he did: http://nighthack.org/wiki/EeeBSD This includes tips on how to get the wireless working, and sound, and some oddities with how X11 works. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = drosehn@rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@FreeBSD.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Troy, NY; USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 07:21:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12FCE16A41B for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 07:21:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ws@au.dyndns.ws) Received: from ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB4813C4FA for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 07:21:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ws@au.dyndns.ws) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAANwtkUeWZWdv/2dsb2JhbAAIriw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,220,1199626200"; d="scan'208";a="38571252" Received: from ppp103-111.static.internode.on.net (HELO [192.168.1.131]) ([150.101.103.111]) by ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 19 Jan 2008 17:36:33 +1030 From: Wayne Sierke To: Jonathan Chen In-Reply-To: <20080118225807.GA87703@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: <47910EC7.1030507@nicoelro.net> <20080118225807.GA87703@osiris.chen.org.nz> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 17:36:17 +1030 Message-Id: <1200726377.4218.20.camel@predator-ii.buffyverse> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Nicolas Letellier , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Eclipse and FreeBSD7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 07:21:43 -0000 On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 11:58 +1300, Jonathan Chen wrote: > On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 09:40:39PM +0100, Nicolas Letellier wrote: > > [...] > > I saw this page (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=118115) > > which says that the last version has corrected the problem (3.2.2_1). > > But the problem is the same. The new version doesn't install jdk*. > > I just installed diablo. > > Eclipse will only work with the native-jdk. Use your installed > diablo-jdk to build the native-jdk, and then remove the diablo-jdk. Does that only apply for 7.0 and/or eclipse-3.2? I previously had eclipse-3.3 (eclipse-devel) running with diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01 on RELENG_6. eclipse is one of the few remaining ports I've yet to update since moving this box to RELENG_7. It actually did get put through a portupgrade cycle but I neglected to have WITHOUT_MOZILLA set which seems to be necessary for eclipse to run on FreeBSD. Wayne From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 07:38:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59D9C16A420 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 07:38:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from mx1.highperformance.net (dsl081-163-122.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.163.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1667F13C45D for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 07:38:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from w16.stradamotorsports.com (w16.stradamotorsports.com [192.168.1.16]) by mx1.highperformance.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0J7cLVV056875 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:38:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Message-ID: <4791A8F3.7090601@highperformance.net> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:38:27 -0800 From: "Jason C. Wells" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071201) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <478F0D5A.9090107@highperformance.net> <20080117081414.GB12470@draenor.org> <478F1049.3000706@boosten.org> <20080117083837.GC12470@draenor.org> <20080117094332.K1563@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080117090210.GD12470@draenor.org> <478F8980.1090301@highperformance.net> <20080118175831.72929086@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20080118175831.72929086@gumby.homeunix.com.> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=2.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_05 autolearn=failed version=3.1.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.6 (2006-10-03) on s4.stradamotorsports.com Subject: Re: Gutmann Method on Empty Space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 07:38:24 -0000 RW wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:59:44 -0800 > "Jason C. Wells" wrote: > > >> Gutmann method might be excessive but any software that uses it shows >> a seriousness about security. > > Gutmann himself regards the continued use of his method as "Voodoo" Yes well. We lay people have only the best voodoo to go by. There are many things that I do with computers that can be called voodoo by virtue of the fact that I do them superstitiously. And if I don't happen to know the optimal patterns/passes to apply to a specific drive, then I'll do what was last known to be adequate until I hear otherwise. (As I have just now.) It's interesting to note that Gutmann's earlier work said, loosely "If you do this, you should be fairly certain you data is unrecoverable." He now says, "A few passes of random data is as good as can be expected." Those two standards of performance are very different. Too bad wikipedia didn't cite the follow on work. And no I don't want to physically shred my drive in a running server. I just want to make sure that any given day that the police come take my functioning computers way that nothing can be recovered that I explicitly deleted. The blank space should be blank. Later, Jason From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 09:15:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4E4A16A417 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:15:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5910413C467 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:15:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b27so1069616fka.11 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:15:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=DiiFMtaz/N4fsBBILoxVFjHO+w1Hfh8Nohng1EiwNlk=; b=A2YJJmiD/O6GMr7fVW0ImwyRIT4uxXNzde2dblGOOTrt9KSeW0ocQd9Fhe7I7kqJpH6SfXmr1uKlexNJKopLucXaRAZwRR7DhyY3UMuPIRn2CoSmSELDpd7OFP4lJpKSbxRsUFOJwKzoKMTamB3+1unH369tSMSMrVwU9NrsOGE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=irI3Z/HRXUq3NUCEaKobi+/z8+Oz6B9Lpppdv8d5t7ncmcv7L3+M/Fw7m4sh4cJsWPN4vL+v4oP34YrJz719DAIkwcMpGtp1eLCY39Ds05PjqOt4ArpWykRhuIo4r/QLMt/qqjPpPoVVuQu48JtsUZskF8VnQbSrgOgCRU/XK0U= Received: by 10.78.201.10 with SMTP id y10mr6089391huf.11.1200734099790; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:14:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.130.5 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:14:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <94136a2c0801190114u46f872eas8f6afd5e52dd73b1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:14:59 +0100 From: "Zbigniew Szalbot" To: "Manolis Kiagias" In-Reply-To: <47912AE1.6000603@otenet.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <94136a2c0801181417w395f7532w4761fc76388ed60@mail.gmail.com> <47912AE1.6000603@otenet.gr> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: going from 6.2 to 6.3 and custom kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:15:01 -0000 Hello again, > > How do I update the kernel manually then? > > > > Do I have to fetch the latest source and then follow the advice given here? > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-building.html > > > > Thanks! > > > > Zbigniew Szalbot > > > > > It will not update your kernel, but if you do freebsd-update install you > will get an updated GENERIC kernel in /boot/GENERIC. > > This is what I did: > > freebsd-update -r 6.3-RELEASE upgrade > > (got the warning you mentioned) > > freebsd-update install > > Got a message about installing kernel updates. Got a new generic kernel > in /boot/GENERIC (check to see this exists!) > > Depending on whether you have console access to the machine or not: > > 1. If you don't have console access (you are doing this remotely), mv > /boot/kernel /boot/mykernel.old and mv /boot/GENERIC /boot/kernel and > reboot. This is because you can't (normally) interrupt the loader > remotely - unless someone does it for you. Continue from step 3. > > 2. If you are in front of the machine, reboot. Stop the boot sequence > when the boot loader comes up, and escape to loader prompt. Type: > > unload > load /boot/GENERIC/kernel > boot > > 3. You are now running a 6.3-RELEASE kernel, albeit a GENERIC one. Run > freebsd-update install again to install the rest of the system. > > 4. Recompile your custom kernel the usual way, i.e. I do have to fetch the latest sources before building a custom kernel, don't I? > > make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL > make installkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL > reboot > > 5. You are done! Thanks! Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 09:22:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 365E816A419 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:22:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A761F13C465 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:22:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from [192.168.0.1] (athedsl-318563.home.otenet.gr [85.72.100.1]) by aiolos.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m0J9Miar021929; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 11:22:45 +0200 Message-ID: <4791C177.6030304@otenet.gr> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 11:23:03 +0200 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zbigniew Szalbot References: <94136a2c0801181417w395f7532w4761fc76388ed60@mail.gmail.com> <47912AE1.6000603@otenet.gr> <94136a2c0801190114u46f872eas8f6afd5e52dd73b1@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <94136a2c0801190114u46f872eas8f6afd5e52dd73b1@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: going from 6.2 to 6.3 and custom kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:22:48 -0000 Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > Hello again, > > >>> How do I update the kernel manually then? >>> >>> Do I have to fetch the latest source and then follow the advice given here? >>> >>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-building.html >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Zbigniew Szalbot >>> >>> >>> >> It will not update your kernel, but if you do freebsd-update install you >> will get an updated GENERIC kernel in /boot/GENERIC. >> >> This is what I did: >> >> freebsd-update -r 6.3-RELEASE upgrade >> >> (got the warning you mentioned) >> >> freebsd-update install >> >> Got a message about installing kernel updates. Got a new generic kernel >> in /boot/GENERIC (check to see this exists!) >> >> Depending on whether you have console access to the machine or not: >> >> 1. If you don't have console access (you are doing this remotely), mv >> /boot/kernel /boot/mykernel.old and mv /boot/GENERIC /boot/kernel and >> reboot. This is because you can't (normally) interrupt the loader >> remotely - unless someone does it for you. Continue from step 3. >> >> 2. If you are in front of the machine, reboot. Stop the boot sequence >> when the boot loader comes up, and escape to loader prompt. Type: >> >> unload >> load /boot/GENERIC/kernel >> boot >> >> 3. You are now running a 6.3-RELEASE kernel, albeit a GENERIC one. Run >> freebsd-update install again to install the rest of the system. >> >> 4. Recompile your custom kernel the usual way, i.e. >> > > I do have to fetch the latest sources before building a custom kernel, don't I? > > >> make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL >> make installkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL >> reboot >> >> 5. You are done! >> > > Thanks! > > Zbigniew Szalbot > > Assuming you had the sources for 6.2 installed (how else could you had compiled a custom kernel anyway?), freebsd-update will also update your sources (look at freebsd-update.conf and you will realize it immediately). Just go ahead and compile your new custom kernel! Manolis From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 09:57:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 309FD16A419 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:57:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4C2D13C457 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:57:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b27so1074521fka.11 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:57:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=WhEpZEn8HyK7385yXtCQmSUICX7hiv1b669BOyKlYxI=; b=ONPrKICsVRfcl6lTLfVsBWf/srw18mpWzon52zgqABZiHO+8jk7I26vQJnVSU7aD3ieqZltx/3YPRAfoePvIvricvriNBm1Sz9oRnncWS0NAW3SuAppHVixoC1UDP5t9WBodWeD5JbrrmJUiGuvm/J+HDGRHN7xfE31nfhiPoLk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=OSEAmm1jKxO7T2tRqifkB3tmBkCLhgKyuVJZchoklMkOAKBNLe9M4B1TWv5oNGDNbo1JBkVkKQ8YZ+UhqTlIcVTyNgfBmARFg5tnplS2nSZ9v3LWP5vQ4xGda/dhxEFz21Z9Epz80cktYR2KB5PfOr0KvORJwZXXh9McJbucigE= Received: by 10.78.176.20 with SMTP id y20mr6125065hue.36.1200736671048; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:57:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.130.5 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:57:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <94136a2c0801190157l7a4ad431pd54e65804d80edf9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:57:51 +0100 From: "Zbigniew Szalbot" To: "Manolis Kiagias" In-Reply-To: <4791C177.6030304@otenet.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <94136a2c0801181417w395f7532w4761fc76388ed60@mail.gmail.com> <47912AE1.6000603@otenet.gr> <94136a2c0801190114u46f872eas8f6afd5e52dd73b1@mail.gmail.com> <4791C177.6030304@otenet.gr> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: going from 6.2 to 6.3 and custom kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:57:53 -0000 Hello, > Assuming you had the sources for 6.2 installed (how else could you had > compiled a custom kernel anyway?), freebsd-update will also update your > sources (look at freebsd-update.conf and you will realize it > immediately). Just go ahead and compile your new custom kernel! Thank you! FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE #6: Sat Jan 19 10:19:28 CET 2008 :) I'd like to thank all people involved with FreeBSD development and support for a great, great product! You're doing an incredible work for the benift of a large community. Thank you! Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 11:02:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D83AC16A421 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 11:02:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: from chen.org.nz (chen.org.nz [202.89.146.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 713CA13C4DB for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 11:02:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 443D3284D2; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:02:20 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:02:20 +1300 From: Jonathan Chen To: Wayne Sierke Message-ID: <20080119110220.GA94573@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: <47910EC7.1030507@nicoelro.net> <20080118225807.GA87703@osiris.chen.org.nz> <1200726377.4218.20.camel@predator-ii.buffyverse> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1200726377.4218.20.camel@predator-ii.buffyverse> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Nicolas Letellier , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Eclipse and FreeBSD7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 11:02:21 -0000 On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 05:36:17PM +1030, Wayne Sierke wrote: > On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 11:58 +1300, Jonathan Chen wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 09:40:39PM +0100, Nicolas Letellier wrote: > > > > [...] > > > I saw this page (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=118115) > > > which says that the last version has corrected the problem (3.2.2_1). > > > But the problem is the same. The new version doesn't install jdk*. > > > I just installed diablo. > > > > Eclipse will only work with the native-jdk. Use your installed > > diablo-jdk to build the native-jdk, and then remove the diablo-jdk. > > Does that only apply for 7.0 and/or eclipse-3.2? I previously had > eclipse-3.3 (eclipse-devel) running with diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01 on > RELENG_6. According to the commit message on the eclipse port, this would apply to FreeBSD 7.x and higher. Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen ------------------------------------------------------------------------ "We laugh in the face of danger, we drop icecubes down the vest of fear" - Edmond Blackadder III From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 12:28:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE3E16A417 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 12:28:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from giotissl@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D179313C447 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 12:28:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from giotissl@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so345088anc.13 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 04:28:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=M14lML+ox4J+sLCDB4p5Zp3CiqFWlg1qORJeOpxVZ3s=; b=hGIbYvcDKCFTClGEWWJURsd8/68bq+q23i85jJg9t2F9cd34q/lcwSb0vgdfZVgI0AUr/V64DnDHK1dczBVxv+Mb/AXrK4H3tI0GSjSRbu25F7zYjpO+PgVi/s+LDCP4nO4phnl8n1is7ifKm1uepGu+SRf7Ec5ocjp27bLWHms= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=dvd4isEDsyRRNpa3WBKr+RGbVfi2TX9dbS8SI+7Bo2AwmFcBM8DmjTEgFnfaDiHWVkmcAoMAJK9/0AosFiXaVhZTpVrj6LevdZTPQCgpeZkK4z7WHRzdPoCj1k1YzfU9MW+GSXyL4IiCcqVDfHgOG9j2AbYY+koDjcdImfMlvHA= Received: by 10.100.123.4 with SMTP id v4mr9570213anc.99.1200745696029; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 04:28:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.211.9 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 04:28:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <795c613b0801190428n569b8262ufd6e2cb9f65cd512@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:28:15 +0200 From: "Giotis Eugen" To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: ftp setup - asap - giotissl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 12:28:17 -0000 hello i am looking at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/packages-using.html im trying to setup my ftp server. I can not connect to my ftp via the ftp softwares. I tried with windows (FlashFXP and smartFXP) and via the Terminal of Linux CentOS5. # ftp -a *ftp2.FreeBSD.org* Connected to ftp2.FreeBSD.org. 220 ftp2.FreeBSD.org FTP server (Version 6.00LS) ready. -------------------------------------------------------------------> ftp3... 331 Guest login ok, send your email address as password. 230- 230- This machine is in Vienna, VA, USA, hosted by Verio. 230- Questions? E-mail freebsd@vienna.verio.net. 230- 230- 230 Guest login ok, access restrictions apply. Remote system type is UNIX. Using binary mode to transfer files. ftp> cd /pub/FreeBSD/ports/packages/sysutils/ 250 CWD command successful. ftp> get lsof-4.56.4.tgz -----------------------------------------------------> I recieve the following error: ftp> get 1sof-4.56.4.tar.gz local: 1sof-4.56.4.tar.gz remote: 1sof-4.56.4.tar.gz 229 Entering Extended Passive Mode (|||54352|) 550 1sof-4.56.4.tar.gz: No such file or directory. local: lsof-4.56.4.tgz remote: lsof-4.56.4.tgz 200 PORT command successful. 150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for 'lsof-4.56.4.tgz' (92375 bytes). 100% |**************************************************| 92375 00:00 ETA 226 Transfer complete. 92375 bytes received in 5.60 seconds (16.11 KB/s) ftp> exit # pkg_add *lsof-4.56.4.tgz** * Can anyone help me ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 13:07:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B51716A417 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:07:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 833C513C448 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:07:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0JD6pi6006271; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:06:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0JD6m8l006268; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:06:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:06:48 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Zbigniew Szalbot In-Reply-To: <94136a2c0801181417w395f7532w4761fc76388ed60@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080119140633.Y6267@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <94136a2c0801181417w395f7532w4761fc76388ed60@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: going from 6.2 to 6.3 and custom kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:07:30 -0000 > WARNING: This system is running a "szalbot" kernel, which is not a > kernel configuration distributed as part of FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE. > This kernel will not be updated: you MUST update the kernel manually > before running "freebsd-update.sh install". > > How do I update the kernel manually then? simply recompile - sources are updated by freebsd-update From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 13:15:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A289C16A41A for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:15:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from colin.brace@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09B3413C457 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:15:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from colin.brace@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so1540575fgg.35 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 05:15:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:x-google-sender-auth; bh=rVz26ZH4BqnZ8Cxaj6CiZp6cscT4OSjU5k28nGJcj54=; b=w1V6THlkzG8aR+cIEEN09Ai9+EFlpUFecxABnEW4eyi4LcDP4tttw6fhyOF4bqYYrfeyLB1717+DX+GCXcVcX7H2J24+eHg4l9WIMGCCztUMb2kBTZX15oLfVl0SalikousPWAVegRtWoZspaXiR5XmXxxYzQgIJ3V4K4rusx8o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:x-google-sender-auth; b=UgaSnHush5Dc5/7/Wjtq0/LxwSzVHgzbbcH3rhqGmEAFyEu/ih51AwSAjjGh5kJzuneP8ryWNxSsti5+D0WjZ7jpg0QkDapNUKowbccwf8INybwMVMqulpSSWHgHmpF8FcDiDwR5fqRqnmb3mLpocn522sMidnhTsmEzTa1zxDY= Received: by 10.82.150.20 with SMTP id x20mr8229150bud.5.1200748551570; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 05:15:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.108.2 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 05:15:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:15:51 +0100 From: "Colin Brace" Sender: colin.brace@gmail.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Google-Sender-Auth: b74fcd9219c74185 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: kernel make error: /usr/src/sys/crypto/rijndael/* missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:15:54 -0000 Hi all, I am trying to compile the kernel for the first time, and I got an error message: make -V CFILES -V SYSTEM_CFILES -V GEN_CFILES | MKDEP_CPP="cc -E" CC="cc" xargs mkdep -a -f .newdep -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -std=c99 -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-extensions -nostdinc -I. -I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/altq -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/pf -I/usr/src/sys/dev/ath -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/ngatm -I/usr/src/sys/dev/twa -I/usr/src/sys/gnu/fs/xfs/FreeBSD -I/usr/src/sys/gnu/fs/xfs/FreeBSD/support -I/usr/src/sys/gnu/fs/xfs -D_KERNEL -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param large-function-growth=1000 -mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-sse3 -ffreestanding cc: /usr/src/sys/crypto/rijndael/rijndael-alg-fst.c: No such file or directory cc: /usr/src/sys/crypto/rijndael/rijndael-api-fst.c: No such file or directory cc: /usr/src/sys/crypto/rijndael/rijndael-api.c: No such file or directory cc: /usr/src/sys/crypto/sha1.c: No such file or directory cc: /usr/src/sys/crypto/sha2/sha2.c: No such file or directory /usr/src/sys/dev/random/hash.c:34:46: error: crypto/rijndael/rijndael- api-fst.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/sys/dev/random/hash.c:35:30: error: crypto/sha2/sha2.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/sys/dev/random/yarrow.c:40:46: error: crypto/rijndael/rijndael- api-fst.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/sys/dev/random/yarrow.c:41:30: error: crypto/sha2/sha2.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/sys/net80211/ieee80211_crypto_ccmp.c:51:38: error: crypto/rijndael/rijndael.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/src/sys/netinet/sctp_os.h:59, from /usr/src/sys/netinet/sctp_pcb.h:39, from /usr/src/sys/netinet/in_proto.c:80: /usr/src/sys/netinet/sctp_os_bsd.h:448:25: error: crypto/sha1.h: No such file or directory [...] mkdep: compile failed *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/VENUS. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. I installed the base and kernel source (CURRENT) with cvsup last night. Any idea what files I am still missing? Thanks -- Colin Brace Amsterdam http://lim.nl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 13:33:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0AF16A41B for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:33:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77DD613C474; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:33:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4791FC2B.5070205@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:33:31 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Colin Brace References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel make error: /usr/src/sys/crypto/rijndael/* missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:33:37 -0000 Colin Brace wrote: > I installed the base and kernel source (CURRENT) with cvsup last night. Any > idea what files I am still missing? Probably you are missing the src-sys-crypto cvsup collection. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 14:07:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEBF416A418 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:07:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from four.harrisons@virgin.net) Received: from n068.sc1.he.tucows.com (smtpout0179.sc1.he.tucows.com [64.97.136.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD0D213C44B for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:07:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from four.harrisons@virgin.net) Received: from sc1-out05.emaildefenseservice.com (64.97.139.2) by n068.sc1.he.tucows.com (7.2.069.1) id 4769316E007633D1; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:07:04 +0000 X-SpamScore: 2 X-Spamcatcher-Summary: 2, 0, 0, e4d8140b5042adf8, eac3de9e7a069b7b, four.harrisons@virgin.net, -, RULES_HIT:355:379:599:601:945:946:947:966:967:973:980:981:988:989:1260:1261:1277:1312:1313:1314:1345:1358:1359:1437:1516:1518:1519:1534:1542:1593:1594:1595:1596:1711:1730:1747:1766:1792:2196:2199:2376:2379:2393:2525:2553:2559:2563:2682:2685:2857:2859:2895:2933:2937:2939:2942:2945:2947:2951:2954:3022:3027:3353:3622:3865:3866:3867:3868:3869:3870:3871:3872:3873:3874:3934:3936:3938:3941:3944: 4250:4362:4385:4860:5007:6119:6261:7679, 0, RBL:none, CacheIP:none, Bayesian:0.5, 0.5, 0.5, Netcheck:none, DomainCache:0, MSF:not bulk, SPF:, MSBL:none, DNSBL:none X-Spamcatcher-Explanation: Received: from desktop.piggybox (client-82-26-24-199.winn.adsl.virgin.net [82.26.24.199]) by sc1-out05.emaildefenseservice.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:07:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from desktop.piggybox (localhost.piggybox [127.0.0.1]) by desktop.piggybox (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0JE74BE004281; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:07:05 GMT (envelope-from peter@desktop.piggybox) Received: (from peter@localhost) by desktop.piggybox (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m0JE744G004111; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:07:04 GMT (envelope-from peter) Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:07:04 +0000 From: peter harrison To: Yuri Pankov Message-ID: <20080119140704.GA1240@desktop.piggybox> References: <20080118233237.GA1069@desktop.piggybox> <20080119000754.GD24750@darklight.org.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080119000754.GD24750@darklight.org.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: questions@freebsd.org, peter harrison Subject: Re: Build server for ports and world... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:07:06 -0000 On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 03:07:54AM +0300, Yuri Pankov wrote: > On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 11:32:37PM +0000, peter harrison wrote: > > I'd like to set up a build server at home to save me time when running portupgrade and building world. > > > > I've read the handbook on this, and I'm happy with the process of NFS mounting /usr/src /usr/obj and /usr/ports etc.. > > > > I've two questions though. > > > > First, my home server currently runs 6.2-RELEASE - I update it using freebsd-update and it doesn't have the source for world & kernel. > > Is it possible to put the 7.0 source on this and build for installation on my desktop, or do I need to take the server to 7.0 before I do this? > > Yes, it should be possible. > > > Second, is there anyway of building packages without installing them? > > I'm not keen to put X and all my desktop gubbins on the server when I only need it to build the packages. > > Look at ports-mgmt/tinderbox, does exactly what you want :-) > > > Thanks for any help. > > > > > > Peter Harrison. > > -- > > "`That young girl is one of the least benightedly > > unintelligent organic life forms it has been my profound > > lack of pleasure not to be able to avoid meeting.'" > > > > - Marvin's first ever compliment about anybody. > > HTH, > Yuri > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Thanks Yuri, I'll take a look at Tinderbox. Peter Harrison. -- "`Maybe somebody here tipped off the Galactic Police,' said Trillian. `Everybody saw you come in.' `You mean they want to arrest me over the phone?' said Zaphod, `Could be. I'm a pretty dangerous dude when I'm cornered.' `Yeah,' said a voice from under the table [Ford's now completely rat-arsed at this point], `you go to pieces so fast people get hit by the shrapnel.'" - Zaphod getting paranoid over a phone call. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 14:13:33 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9523C16A419 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:13:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from colin.brace@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.152]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B7E013C467 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:13:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from colin.brace@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so1554048fgg.35 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 06:13:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=KW/k+MN2XVL+lIbIVD5NXkD4+nUgjZO5WiXpYUgji5E=; b=Rb4Zifx0u1+p6pH9PRT+//9ehMbQXuPmhNgCwGkLKyi/frZxPR5RlNJSLxzheWGZhkoNNEsAglbjJGgowNo7lcvq53kkslD5bvVCjWpeNiwPoMy0pHxDmUHnGGsUXoHnvKUQbg/XIfy0AxaWFTXDjIoPmjJpg33qY84oPTDHKq8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=fS1jwTBD5FHA0aSWoR7tUM3yi6pquY8mxL5hF3T354cFj2kVtjpLqpConL+l21ArUWrF+zE1Obe83icXB7ueY97dwjFJTNH9GylSwYjayFUylicvb/Hvg8PWpR/+VKdpy84bqyFfixoIc1V/jfDMTpUQq8pgaeIBGmEvia9iQiI= Received: by 10.82.158.12 with SMTP id g12mr8301109bue.18.1200752011305; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 06:13:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.108.2 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 06:13:31 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:13:31 +0100 From: "Colin Brace" Sender: colin.brace@gmail.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4791FC2B.5070205@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4791FC2B.5070205@FreeBSD.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: d12313ae6859189b Subject: Re: kernel make error: /usr/src/sys/crypto/rijndael/* missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:13:33 -0000 On Jan 19, 2008 2:33 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Probably you are missing the src-sys-crypto cvsup collection. Thanks. Fixed. Unfortunately, I got another error. Any ideas what is going wrong here? MAKE=make sh /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh VENUS cc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -std=c99 -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-extensions -nostdinc -I. -I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/altq -D_KERNEL -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param large-function-growth=1000 -mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-sse3 -ffreestanding -Werror vers.c linking kernel scvidctl.o(.text+0xb1): In function `sc_render_match': : undefined reference to `__start_set_scrndr_set' scvidctl.o(.text+0xb6): In function `sc_render_match': : undefined reference to `__stop_set_scrndr_set' scvidctl.o(.text+0xbd): In function `sc_render_match': : undefined reference to `__start_set_scrndr_set' scvidctl.o(.text+0xe6): In function `sc_render_match': : undefined reference to `__stop_set_scrndr_set' scvidctl.o(.text+0x10f): In function `sc_set_graphics_mode': : undefined reference to `vidsw' scvidctl.o(.text+0x342): In function `sc_set_text_mode': : undefined reference to `vidsw' scvidctl.o(.text+0x888): In function `sc_vid_ioctl': : undefined reference to `vidsw' scvidctl.o(.text+0x914): In function `sc_vid_ioctl': : undefined reference to `vidsw' scvidctl.o(.text+0xa50): In function `sc_vid_ioctl': : undefined reference to `vidsw' scvidctl.o(.text+0xac8): more undefined references to `vidsw' follow scvidctl.o(.text+0xbfb): In function `sc_vid_ioctl': : undefined reference to `vid_get_adapter' scvidctl.o(.text+0xc0d): In function `sc_vid_ioctl': : undefined reference to `vidsw' scvidctl.o(.text+0xc50): In function `sc_vid_ioctl': : undefined reference to `vidsw' scvidctl.o(.text+0xc80): In function `sc_vid_ioctl': : undefined reference to `vid_get_adapter' scvidctl.o(.text+0xd2b): In function `sc_vid_ioctl': : undefined reference to `vid_get_adapter' scvidctl.o(.text+0xd43): In function `sc_vid_ioctl': : undefined reference to `vidsw' scvidctl.o(.text+0xdb3): In function `sc_vid_ioctl': : undefined reference to `vidsw' scvidctl.o(.text+0xdf6): In function `sc_vid_ioctl': : undefined reference to `vidsw' scvidctl.o(.text+0xe32): In function `sc_vid_ioctl': : undefined reference to `vidsw' scvidctl.o(.text+0xe4e): In function `sc_vid_ioctl': : undefined reference to `vidsw' scvidctl.o(.text+0xee4): more undefined references to `vidsw' follow syscons.o(.text+0xf6d): In function `sc_cnterm': : undefined reference to `vid_release' syscons.o(.text+0x1005): In function `set_mode': : undefined reference to `vidsw' syscons.o(.text+0x1054): In function `set_mode': : undefined reference to `vidsw' syscons.o(.text+0x124e): In function `init_scp': : undefined reference to `vidsw' syscons.o(.text+0x1744): In function `exchange_scr': : undefined reference to `vidsw' syscons.o(.text+0x1c74): In function `scvidprobe': : undefined reference to `vid_configure' syscons.o(.text+0x1c84): In function `scvidprobe': : undefined reference to `vid_find_adapter' syscons.o(.text+0x317e): In function `scinit': : undefined reference to `vid_release' syscons.o(.text+0x31bf): In function `scinit': : undefined reference to `vid_allocate' syscons.o(.text+0x31ca): In function `scinit': : undefined reference to `vid_get_adapter' syscons.o(.text+0x3222): In function `scinit': : undefined reference to `vidsw' syscons.o(.text+0x3241): In function `scinit': : undefined reference to `vidsw' syscons.o(.text+0x34c1): In function `scinit': : undefined reference to `vidsw' umass.o(.text+0x19): In function `umass_cam_detach_sim': : undefined reference to `xpt_bus_deregister' umass.o(.text+0x35): In function `umass_cam_detach_sim': : undefined reference to `cam_sim_free' umass.o(.text+0x489): In function `umass_cam_sense_cb': : undefined reference to `xpt_done' umass.o(.text+0x62b): In function `umass_cam_cb': : undefined reference to `xpt_done' umass.o(.text+0x64b): In function `umass_cam_cb': : undefined reference to `xpt_done' umass.o(.text+0x8e9): In function `umass_cam_action': : undefined reference to `xpt_done' umass.o(.text+0x91b): In function `umass_cam_action': : undefined reference to `xpt_done' umass.o(.text+0x99b): more undefined references to `xpt_done' follow umass.o(.text+0xae7): In function `umass_cam_action': : undefined reference to `cam_calc_geometry' umass.o(.text+0xaef): In function `umass_cam_action': : undefined reference to `xpt_done' umass.o(.text+0xb26): In function `umass_cam_action': : undefined reference to `xpt_done' umass.o(.text+0xbb9): In function `umass_cam_action': : undefined reference to `xpt_done' umass.o(.text+0xcb8): In function `umass_cam_action': : undefined reference to `xpt_done' umass.o(.text+0xcfa): In function `umass_cam_action': : undefined reference to `xpt_done' umass.o(.text+0xfe5): In function `umass_attach': : undefined reference to `cam_simq_alloc' umass.o(.text+0x1039): In function `umass_attach': : undefined reference to `cam_sim_alloc' umass.o(.text+0x1065): In function `umass_attach': : undefined reference to `xpt_bus_register' umass.o(.text+0x1145): In function `umass_attach': : undefined reference to `cam_simq_free' umass.o(.text+0x1281): In function `umass_cam_rescan_callback': : undefined reference to `xpt_free_path' umass.o(.text+0x22de): In function `umass_cam_rescan': : undefined reference to `xpt_periph' umass.o(.text+0x22ed): In function `umass_cam_rescan': : undefined reference to `xpt_create_path' umass.o(.text+0x2323): In function `umass_cam_rescan': : undefined reference to `xpt_setup_ccb' umass.o(.text+0x2340): In function `umass_cam_rescan': : undefined reference to `xpt_action' umass.o(.text+0x43b): In function `umass_cam_quirk_cb': : undefined reference to `xpt_done' umass.o(.text+0x453): In function `umass_cam_quirk_cb': : undefined reference to `xpt_done' *** Error code 1 -- Colin Brace Amsterdam http://lim.nl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 14:17:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D5216A41A for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:17:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E625813C457; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:16:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <47920657.4070206@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:16:55 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Colin Brace References: <4791FC2B.5070205@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel make error: /usr/src/sys/crypto/rijndael/* missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:17:00 -0000 Colin Brace wrote: > On Jan 19, 2008 2:33 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >> Probably you are missing the src-sys-crypto cvsup collection. > > Thanks. Fixed. > > Unfortunately, I got another error. Any ideas what is going wrong here? Some things incorrectly removed from your kernel config. Compare carefully to GENERIC or just revert. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 14:28:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADAB916A468 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:28:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danger@FreeBSD.org) Received: from virtual.micronet.sk (smtp.micronet.sk [84.16.32.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70EDB13C461 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:28:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danger@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by virtual.micronet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 751E210E708; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:27:40 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at virtual.micronet.sk Received: from virtual.micronet.sk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (virtual.micronet.sk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id itVqysvnnhdk; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:27:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from DANGER-PC (danger.mcrn.sk [84.16.37.254]) by virtual.micronet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id F19D610E6A0; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:27:35 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:28:23 +0100 From: Daniel Gerzo X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.99.3) Professional Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <2310211738.20080119152823@rulez.sk> To: "Colin Brace" In-Reply-To: References: <4791FC2B.5070205@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: kernel make error: /usr/src/sys/crypto/rijndael/* missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Gerzo List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:28:32 -0000 Hello Colin, Saturday, January 19, 2008, 3:13:31 PM, you wrote: > Unfortunately, I got another error. Any ideas what is going wrong here? I would guess a missing device scbus and/or da in your kernel configuration file. -- Best regards, Daniel mailto:danger@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 15:11:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC65B16A475 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:11:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd08@dfwlp.com) Received: from pollux.dfwlp.com (rrcs-64-183-212-244.sw.biz.rr.com [64.183.212.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89BE413C4EB for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:11:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd08@dfwlp.com) Received: from athena.dfwlp.com (athena.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.82]) (authenticated bits=0) by pollux.dfwlp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0JFBlb6039483 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:11:47 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from freebsd08@dfwlp.com) From: Jonathan Horne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:08:18 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801190908.19272.freebsd08@dfwlp.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on pollux.dfwlp.com Subject: upgraded from 62-p10 to 6.3-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:11:50 -0000 ... and something i never expected to happen... happened. my backup app (veritas netbackup) relies on compat4x and compat5x to operate. ive never had any previous issues getting netbackup to run, but after the 6.3 upgrade, suddenly the compat 4x and 5x ports were uninstalled? i reinstalled them again, but this didnt help. i have no idea where to go with this issue now, except to start a new system from scratch and see where that leads me. stranger still... i have several 7.0 systems, and they all work without a hitch. btw, the netbackup agent specifies that is compatible with FreeBSD 4.5, but with the compat4x and 5x packages, the agent has never had any trouble operating. did something change in 6.3 that would affect how applications operate with the compat libraries? at a loss, -- Jonathan Horne http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org freebsd08 _@_ dfwlp.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 16:05:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D63816A421 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 16:05:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from colin.brace@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.152]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2817213C461 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 16:05:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from colin.brace@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so1585149fgg.35 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 08:05:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=UYbWtTzicFlER7WpMgG1a5J/kkY4hgyBiLVWOdwYYms=; b=jvgFCKhKFCFp4j74yiXwwYMvRXx4KoZlc3sgcf1Zh2MdfUGECQg+f2L544FEBf60NOgJgZ9A7dSF4H0DQO9tpXHVCydLZISQOc1skvUuEkUboIv3z+MIdIfS/77PHAOraY+p0UqsGXmXC8I4WBZsdfgf9n33NgXiv46yec0W3mQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=rSwPcxXakAUSqHHoLiJLczw3Q+/lh5S8Tf2rV1aogdPAZunTRcHzmvPt0r69CPMNld0IjVI1jl4Gk4wn+5dHmRUZrI/Ya6GAgSNxbCZBIN1aSZNNkKn7B8ylLuzMEb3FY4Wc/QfBM36b2zirfYSEw7RjmPv76X478wuNx/OZDU0= Received: by 10.82.158.12 with SMTP id g12mr8471811bue.18.1200758722507; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 08:05:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.108.2 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 08:05:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 17:05:22 +0100 From: "Colin Brace" Sender: colin.brace@gmail.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <47920657.4070206@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4791FC2B.5070205@FreeBSD.org> <47920657.4070206@FreeBSD.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 46ad84188ceff927 Subject: Re: kernel make error: /usr/src/sys/crypto/rijndael/* missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 16:05:24 -0000 On Jan 19, 2008 3:16 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Some things incorrectly removed from your kernel config. Compare > carefully to GENERIC or just revert. I reverted, then added the ALTQ lines. Compile time was about an hour on a 1.6Ghz Pentium IV, so that wasn't so bad. Rebooted OK. Thanks again. -- Colin Brace Amsterdam http://lim.nl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 16:30:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 276D516A47C for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 16:30:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from ns1.kq6up.org (adsl-76-238-148-145.dsl.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [76.238.148.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 035A713C458 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 16:30:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([192.168.1.2]) by ns1.kq6up.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m0JGUooX021264 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 08:30:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Message-ID: <479225B9.1030507@chrismaness.com> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 08:30:49 -0800 From: Chris Maness User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Dual Processor? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 16:30:52 -0000 Is there a way to see if the system is utilizing both processors on a two processor system? I seem to remember the top command in Linux showed the load balance between the two processors (I could be wrong it has been a while since I used it). Is there some ap that can display these kinds of statistics? Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 16:37:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 256B716A417 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 16:37:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd08@dfwlp.com) Received: from pollux.dfwlp.com (rrcs-64-183-212-244.sw.biz.rr.com [64.183.212.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C8713C46E for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 16:37:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd08@dfwlp.com) Received: from athena.dfwlp.com (athena.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.82]) (authenticated bits=0) by pollux.dfwlp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0JGbuE4040986 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:37:56 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from freebsd08@dfwlp.com) From: Jonathan Horne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:37:56 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <479225B9.1030507@chrismaness.com> In-Reply-To: <479225B9.1030507@chrismaness.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801191037.56296.freebsd08@dfwlp.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on pollux.dfwlp.com Subject: Re: Dual Processor? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 16:37:59 -0000 On Saturday 19 January 2008 10:30:49 am Chris Maness wrote: > Is there a way to see if the system is utilizing both processors on a > two processor system? I seem to remember the top command in Linux > showed the load balance between the two processors (I could be wrong it > has been a while since I used it). Is there some ap that can display > these kinds of statistics? > > Chris > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" its still top, it just doesnt display the same way it does in linux. look for a column C: PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 2211 jhorne 1 96 0 125M 50892K CPU1 0 18.9H 4.59% Xorg 35271 jhorne 1 96 0 107M 88500K select 1 20:03 0.44% opera 2301 jhorne 1 96 0 81652K 50320K select 0 100:57 0.20% kstars the C column tells you what processor the thread is using. cheers, -- Jonathan Horne http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org freebsd08 _@_ dfwlp.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 16:43:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D79C316A418 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 16:43:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd08@dfwlp.com) Received: from pollux.dfwlp.com (rrcs-64-183-212-244.sw.biz.rr.com [64.183.212.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A186313C455 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 16:43:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd08@dfwlp.com) Received: from athena.dfwlp.com (athena.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.82]) (authenticated bits=0) by pollux.dfwlp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0JGhags041057 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:43:36 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from freebsd08@dfwlp.com) From: Jonathan Horne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:43:36 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <795c613b0801190428n569b8262ufd6e2cb9f65cd512@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <795c613b0801190428n569b8262ufd6e2cb9f65cd512@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801191043.36715.freebsd08@dfwlp.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on pollux.dfwlp.com Subject: Re: ftp setup - asap - giotissl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 16:43:39 -0000 On Saturday 19 January 2008 06:28:15 am Giotis Eugen wrote: > hello > i am looking at > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/packages-using.ht >ml im trying to setup my ftp server. > I can not connect to my ftp via the ftp softwares. > I tried with windows (FlashFXP and smartFXP) and via the Terminal of Linux > CentOS5. > > > # ftp -a *ftp2.FreeBSD.org* > Connected to ftp2.FreeBSD.org. > 220 ftp2.FreeBSD.org FTP server (Version 6.00LS) ready. > -------------------------------------------------------------------> > ftp3... > 331 Guest login ok, send your email address as password. > 230- > 230- This machine is in Vienna, VA, USA, hosted by Verio. > 230- Questions? E-mail freebsd@vienna.verio.net. > 230- > 230- > 230 Guest login ok, access restrictions apply. > Remote system type is UNIX. > Using binary mode to transfer files. > ftp> cd /pub/FreeBSD/ports/packages/sysutils/ > 250 CWD command successful. > ftp> get lsof-4.56.4.tgz > -----------------------------------------------------> I recieve the > following error: > ftp> get 1sof-4.56.4.tar.gz local: > 1sof-4.56.4.tar.gz remote: 1sof-4.56.4.tar.gz > 229 Entering Extended Passive Mode > (|||54352|) 550 1sof-4.56.4.tar.gz: No such file or directory. > > local: lsof-4.56.4.tgz remote: lsof-4.56.4.tgz > 200 PORT command successful. > 150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for 'lsof-4.56.4.tgz' (92375 > bytes). 100% |**************************************************| 92375 > 00:00 ETA 226 Transfer complete. > 92375 bytes received in 5.60 seconds (16.11 KB/s) > ftp> exit > # pkg_add *lsof-4.56.4.tgz** > > > > > > > > > * > > Can anyone help me ? by your examples, im having difficulty understanding that the issue is. i dont see any output from connecting to *your* ftp server, and the associated errors. can you be more specific about what is not working? -- Jonathan Horne http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org freebsd08 _@_ dfwlp.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 17:03:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 970EF16A41A for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 17:03:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from punosevac@math.arizona.edu) Received: from smtp-gs.math.arizona.edu (math051.cs.arizona.edu [150.135.82.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A3B513C478 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 17:03:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from punosevac@math.arizona.edu) Received: from Debian-exim by smtp-gs.math.arizona.edu with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JGH6b-00039Y-20 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:03:42 -0700 Received: from 71-220-164-236.tcsn.qwest.net ([71.220.164.236] helo=.domain.actdsltmp) by smtp-gs.math.arizona.edu with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JGH6M-00039G-PT; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:03:26 -0700 Message-ID: <47922D5C.40401@math.arizona.edu> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:03:24 -0700 From: Predrag Punosevac User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070916) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Horne References: <479225B9.1030507@chrismaness.com> <200801191037.56296.freebsd08@dfwlp.com> In-Reply-To: <200801191037.56296.freebsd08@dfwlp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ACL-Warn: The HELO/EHLO greeting .domain.actdsltmp is invalid X-Outgoing-Spam-Score: -3.7 (---) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dual Processor? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 17:03:43 -0000 Jonathan Horne wrote: > On Saturday 19 January 2008 10:30:49 am Chris Maness wrote: > >> Is there a way to see if the system is utilizing both processors on a >> two processor system? I seem to remember the top command in Linux >> showed the load balance between the two processors (I could be wrong it >> has been a while since I used it). Is there some ap that can display >> these kinds of statistics? >> >> Chris >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > its still top, it just doesnt display the same way it does in linux. look for > a column C: > > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND > 2211 jhorne 1 96 0 125M 50892K CPU1 0 18.9H 4.59% Xorg > 35271 jhorne 1 96 0 107M 88500K select 1 20:03 0.44% opera > 2301 jhorne 1 96 0 81652K 50320K select 0 100:57 0.20% kstars > > the C column tells you what processor the thread is using. > > cheers, > systat [pedja@ /usr/home/Pedja]$ systat /0 /1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 Load Average /0% /10 /20 /30 /40 /50 /60 /70 /80 /90 /100 root idle: cpu0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX root idle: cpu1 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 18:24:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F5216A469 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:24:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfalang.bob@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E63813C4D3 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:24:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfalang.bob@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so1627523fgg.35 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:24:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=H6If61uFLRO/AR4L12U58ImCEgnRsVGHZ0pWOXa2whU=; b=h7dDcSasNmlVojH442bdq7iMl4zdB3q6toUCcBw0Pyaju0HA+RHl48iRpgyW+S6Ro0ZwkElxB6BNEfrIe+I+dVAqYZBFXUpz3LKdJc2TcAwlb9h0lqSHhaA5bwLL0qzKcyUnWkyA7TVxynVvcFjELq0FEUGz4DVwhpWCeK7sVlI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=Rvp90ebfCZPp6AoCqvYKxqVknh2J5X2cVkGiEsLSMJKgnkYuXGpcDOzsX7dKED285tjk8LP/KrDKHObFimntx5J0QjsSCiclPpPzZdvwAY+9rW47WPoYLBQhBXoK+rVEG4LmfrIXiDTjH2FjigksD7hv/I6OaWNsh+D8+sAcMYs= Received: by 10.86.28.5 with SMTP id b5mr4437325fgb.76.1200767091041; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:24:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.86.59.15 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:24:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <58d1e8d30801191024i21696d8ek9f14b326f1f505a0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:24:51 -0500 From: "Bob Falanga" To: freebsd-questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: XWINDOWS is giving me a problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:24:53 -0000 I ran /usr/ports/UPDATING which took all day. When I was finished I started xwindows and it worked fine, so as usual I shutdown the machine. Later when I restarted the computer and tried to restart xwindows it would not start but gave me several errors, the log is included below: Jan 19 12:23:49 twcny kdm-bin[754]: X server for display :0 terminated unexpectedly Jan 19 12:23:49 twcny kdm-bin: :0[758]: IO Error in XOpenDisplay Jan 19 12:23:49 twcny kdm-bin[754]: Unable to fire up local display :0; disabling. HELP Thank you, Bob Falanga From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 18:39:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D1B616A41A for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:39:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46A4B13C45D for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:39:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0JIbmPB001464; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:37:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0JIbfVg001461; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:37:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:37:41 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Bob Falanga In-Reply-To: <58d1e8d30801191024i21696d8ek9f14b326f1f505a0@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080119193618.D1445@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <58d1e8d30801191024i21696d8ek9f14b326f1f505a0@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: XWINDOWS is giving me a problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:39:52 -0000 > I ran /usr/ports/UPDATING which took all day. When I was finished I started > xwindows and it worked fine, so as usual I shutdown the machine. Later when X window system, not x-windows. it's not a kind of windows (fortunately). > I restarted the computer and tried to restart xwindows it would not start > but gave me several errors, the log is included below: > Jan 19 12:23:49 twcny kdm-bin[754]: X server for display :0 terminated > unexpectedly > Jan 19 12:23:49 twcny kdm-bin: :0[758]: IO Error in XOpenDisplay > Jan 19 12:23:49 twcny kdm-bin[754]: Unable to fire up local display :0; > disabling. > look at /var/log/XOrg.0.log to see why x server doesn't work From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 18:44:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA9116A419 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:44:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob89@bobj.org) Received: from eastrmmtai107.cox.net (eastrmmtai107.cox.net [68.230.240.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D794113C44B for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:44:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob89@bobj.org) Received: from eastrmimpo01.cox.net ([68.1.16.119]) by eastrmmtao101.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20080119182012.FLKO129.eastrmmtao101.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net> for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:20:12 -0500 Received: from mail.bobj.org ([70.185.102.217]) by eastrmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id f6K51Y00J4hS3Ka0000000; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:19:06 -0500 Received: from bob.wb4jcm.org (bob.wb4jcm.org [192.168.132.33]) (AUTH: PLAIN bobj, ) by mail.bobj.org with esmtp; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:20:11 -0500 From: Bob Johnson To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:20:09 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801191320.09985.bob89@bobj.org> Cc: Subject: Wrong times written by mkisofs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:44:07 -0000 I recently built a CD of images to give to a friend. I noticed the timestamps displayed when I list the CD contents are five hours earlier than they should be. Five hours matches my GMT offset. This is a dual-boot system with Win XP, so the hardware clock is set to local time. E.g. a file on my hard drive has a correct timestamp -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 2246671 Jan 19 12:22 IMG_0660_080115_2348.JPG while the same file on the resulting CD looks like -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 2246671 Jan 19 07:22 IMG_0660_080115_2348.JPG The "date" command returns the correct local time. Did I do something incorrectly, or is this a bug in mkisofs? It appears to me that mkisofs decided to correct for GMT offset when it shouldn't have. The sequence of operations I followed is below. - Bob # ls -l ToJoe total 62544 -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 2246671 Jan 19 12:22 IMG_0660_080115_2348.JPG -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 3346787 Jan 19 12:22 IMG_0661_080116_0524.JPG -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 3623969 Jan 19 12:22 IMG_0662_080116_0525.JPG -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 3966310 Jan 19 12:22 IMG_0663_080116_0526.JPG -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 3971338 Jan 19 12:22 IMG_0664_080116_0526.JPG -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 3946837 Jan 19 12:22 IMG_0665_080116_0528.JPG -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 3873753 Jan 19 12:22 IMG_0666_080116_0528.JPG -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 3832501 Jan 19 12:22 IMG_0667_080116_0529.JPG -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 3854064 Jan 19 12:22 IMG_0668_080116_0531.JPG -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 3849156 Jan 19 12:22 IMG_0669_080116_0532.JPG -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 3868314 Jan 19 12:23 IMG_0670_080116_0533.JPG -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 3901654 Jan 19 12:23 IMG_0671_080116_0534.JPG -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 3851665 Jan 19 12:23 IMG_0672_080116_0537.JPG -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 3850832 Jan 19 12:23 IMG_0673_080116_0538.JPG -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 3876448 Jan 19 12:23 IMG_0674_080116_0542.JPG -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 3866105 Jan 19 12:23 IMG_0675_080116_0543.JPG -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 3881576 Jan 19 12:23 IMG_0676_080116_0543.JPG [bobo@sniffles ~/images]$ mkisofs -J -R -o FMband.iso ToJoe/* 16.05% done, estimate finish Sat Jan 19 12:24:16 2008 32.04% done, estimate finish Sat Jan 19 12:24:16 2008 48.00% done, estimate finish Sat Jan 19 12:24:18 2008 64.04% done, estimate finish Sat Jan 19 12:24:17 2008 80.04% done, estimate finish Sat Jan 19 12:24:17 2008 96.01% done, estimate finish Sat Jan 19 12:24:18 2008 Total translation table size: 0 Total rockridge attributes bytes: 1801 Total directory bytes: 0 Path table size(bytes): 10 Max brk space used d064 31250 extents written (61 MB) [bobo@sniffles ~/images]$ su Password: [root@sniffles /home/bobo/images]# burncd -f /dev/acd0 -s 8 data FMband.iso fixate next writeable LBA 0 writing from file FMband.iso size 62500 KB written this track 62500 KB (100%) total 62500 KB fixating CD, please wait.. [root@sniffles /home/bobo/images]# mount_cd9660 /dev/acd0 /mnt [root@sniffles /home/bobo/images]# ls -l /mnt total 62113 -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 2246671 Jan 19 07:22 IMG_0660_080115_2348.JPG -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 3346787 Jan 19 07:22 IMG_0661_080116_0524.JPG -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 3623969 Jan 19 07:22 IMG_0662_080116_0525.JPG -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 3966310 Jan 19 07:22 IMG_0663_080116_0526.JPG -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 3971338 Jan 19 07:22 IMG_0664_080116_0526.JPG -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 3946837 Jan 19 07:22 IMG_0665_080116_0528.JPG -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 3873753 Jan 19 07:22 IMG_0666_080116_0528.JPG -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 3832501 Jan 19 07:22 IMG_0667_080116_0529.JPG -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 3854064 Jan 19 07:22 IMG_0668_080116_0531.JPG -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 3849156 Jan 19 07:22 IMG_0669_080116_0532.JPG -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 3868314 Jan 19 07:23 IMG_0670_080116_0533.JPG -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 3901654 Jan 19 07:23 IMG_0671_080116_0534.JPG -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 3851665 Jan 19 07:23 IMG_0672_080116_0537.JPG -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 3850832 Jan 19 07:23 IMG_0673_080116_0538.JPG -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 3876448 Jan 19 07:23 IMG_0674_080116_0542.JPG -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 3866105 Jan 19 07:23 IMG_0675_080116_0543.JPG -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 3881576 Jan 19 07:23 IMG_0676_080116_0543.JPG [root@sniffles /home/bobo/images]# date Sat Jan 19 12:27:25 EST 2008 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 18:58:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 742B516A418 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:58:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwhiteh@onetel.com) Received: from smtp1.bethere.co.uk (smtp1.betherenow.co.uk [87.194.0.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C9513C4D1 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:58:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwhiteh@onetel.com) Received: from [192.168.1.71] (87-194-3-32.bethere.co.uk [87.194.3.32]) by smtp1.bethere.co.uk (Postfix) with SMTP id 05D5B98007 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:58:50 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <47924869.2000909@onetel.com> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:58:49 +0000 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: localhost in sudoers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:58:51 -0000 Hi, If I put my computers ip address in sudoers a command runs successfully. If I put localhost I am prompted for a password. Check I can't run it normally: %/root/testsudo /root/testsudo: Permission denied. Entry in sudoers: chrisw 192.168.1.71=NOPASSWD:/root/testsudo %sudo /root/testsudo hello Entry in sudoers: chrisw localhost=NOPASSWD:/root/testsudo %sudo /root/testsudo Password: chrisw is not allowed to run sudo on eco. This incident will be reported. %ping localhost PING localhost (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.034 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.021 ms ^C /var/log/messages says 'user NOT authorized on host' The problem is this machine gets its ip address by dhcp so I shouldn't enter an ip in sudoers. Is there a neat way round this? Thanks Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 19:32:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4724416A417 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:32:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jorn@wcborstel.com) Received: from mail.wcborstel.com (www.wcborstel.com [82.93.93.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D040D13C447 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:32:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jorn@wcborstel.com) Received: from mail.wcborstel.com (localhost [10.0.0.2]) by mail.wcborstel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 946C3433B4E; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:33:16 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.wcborstel.com (Postfix, from userid 58) id 3BBF9433B4D; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:33:16 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on mail.wcborstel.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Report: * -1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from [10.0.1.26] (unknown [10.0.1.26]) by mail.wcborstel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB7E7433A60; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:33:11 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4792505B.5000004@wcborstel.com> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:32:43 +0100 From: Jorn Argelo User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Almberg References: <87A9631B-EAC5-41B8-B4C2-001C3ADBA486@identry.com> <200801150237.m0F2bqEg000116@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <360AB6AE-B3C1-4CA6-AFC1-378B48B3C6DF@identry.com> <200801160254.m0G2skn2022882@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <6FF7BE89-140E-4D61-9FB3-247F88A42998@identry.com> In-Reply-To: <6FF7BE89-140E-4D61-9FB3-247F88A42998@identry.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No spam??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:32:52 -0000 John Almberg wrote: >>> 2008-01-14 09:30:37.074087500 rblsmtpd: 123.20.89.67 pid 72121: 451 >>> http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=123.20.89.67 >> >> Just one comment, in my installation of SpamAssassin, it reports in >> syslog as spamd, not at rblsmtpd. This looks like logs from the >> rblsmtpd program that is not SpamAssasin. >> >> As some one mentionned, one way to prevent false positive and too >> agressive black lists is to use them through SpamAssassin only, where >> the black list score is only part of the spaminess. The draw back is >> that it puts more load the server and SpamAssassin that has to >> scrutinize every email, while dropping at the SMTP level is fast and >> uses very low resources. >> > > Ah... I see. Yes, you are correct. It is rblsmtpd that is doing the > filtering. > > One of my goals with this mail server set up (primarily pf, qmail, > spamassassin, maildrop, courier) was to minimize processing, since my > last set up got totally bogged down handling my, and my client's > email, frequently running with a load of 8 or more with several spam > per second. A real drag. > > This set up runs at a much lower load, and seems to do a better job > filtering spam. Since you're already using PF, why not use OpenBSD spamd (not spamassassin) as well? You don't need rblsmtpd then, and OpenBSD spamd operates together with PF. Maybe rblsmtpd does as well, I don't know - I never tried it. Also in combination with relaydb to create your own blacklists it can be pretty interesting. Check out http://www.openbsd.org/spamd/ for additional info. Anyway, to go a little more on the background about blacklists; we were troubled by a lot of "false positive" entries in the blacklists (we use uatraps and nixspam, and spamassassin checks on blacklists like spamhaus since they only allow DNS queries if you don't want to pay). We had big ISPs blacklisted, and seeing at the amount of mailservers they have you don't want to check all of that by hand. And I'm sure somebody else noticed Gmail's awkward way of handling outgoing e-mail. They apparently have one global mail queue or something and try another mail server (of the hundereds they have) when the delivery fails once - a horrible situation for greylisting. So what we did is create a Perl script that checks every blacklisted entry for a PTR record and tried to give an SMTP HELO command. We filter the PTR record on several keywords (like dsl, dynamic, cable, ip address, stuff like that). If a valid PTR record or a valid SMTP HELO reply has been recieved we remove that entry automatically from the blacklist. So you still blacklist the zillions of DSL connection and filter out the big ISPs or other customers. Naturally you will filter some spammers out using this method, but we still have SpamAssassin as a second layer doing a fine job.(And FYI: it picks a random IP address and has a 1 second delay on everything it checks - we don't want to cause a fuss at ISPs with a lot of blacklisted entries). There's more stuff in this script but the point of this e-mail is not a lecture of that :P Anyway, ever since we put this script into place we got zero complains about blacklists, while still effectively trapping spammers into OpenBSD spamd and keeping them busy. Quite a story - I hope someone might find this info useful one way or another. As always, YMMV. - Jorn > > -- John > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 19:42:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A29916A41A for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:42:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.157]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39BF713C45B for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:42:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so1646542fgg.35 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 11:42:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=s/h4RV3LhTNm+o57yKzgfSfT5y8U/4+4WrSTB/cHj3E=; b=A3H3EFUtmIHqKrcwqt/ftaHMCvTxg8h+RSdfOxHTWmsQE6XlBFBOEO9TmC4ZieivhZX7hIBaC059LlLQ9VVwFD2w8fM+b+2oL1akARsICVxowZlYrWcngfKdB9bptt7woPA0WQFWZhwA3l/6DJNYgiXV9z+t2GJXG+xkj5BRNP8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=IjBQxp+tXNxxmfCs1gG+0HIvZvO9AeicRzt6aRJfhGosooU3Uc82ss7cRJFEUpwKYHguEsUp3F0xu/TzyRXU6OruF8v/pwAa+cxnWLr5kRT5AmorTRmvBt+BsXyTn3tSL9H7kY+vF2LSpH9nePxV5lwp26lu5s+YNxb060dL31Q= Received: by 10.78.183.8 with SMTP id g8mr6972344huf.55.1200771777653; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 11:42:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.130.5 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 11:42:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <94136a2c0801191142r51a7715by99e56ee658621e5d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:42:57 +0100 From: "Zbigniew Szalbot" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: 6.2-Release to 6.3-Release and automatically merge changes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:42:59 -0000 Hello, Encouraged by an apparent ease of use of FreeBSD update utility to go to 6.3 I decided to perform the update on an office machine, too. I issued: $ sh freebsd-update.sh -f freebsd-update.conf -r 6.3-RELEASE upgrade and after some time there came a screen like this: Attempting to automatically merge changes in files... done. The following file could not be merged automatically: /etc/defaults/periodic.conf Press Enter to edit this file in vi and resolve the conflicts manually... <<<<<<< current version # $FreeBSD: src/etc/defaults/periodic.conf,v 1.33.2.1 2006/03/08 23:01:18 brueffer Exp $ ======= # $FreeBSD: src/etc/defaults/periodic.conf,v 1.33.2.3.2.1 2007/12/06 08:11:19 jhb Exp $ >>>>>>> 6.3-RELEASE Now, I can't be 100% certain but I think I have never touched periodic.conf and not really sure how to progress on from here. Another example is rc.conf which of course I edited in the past adding various services as needed. <<<<<<< current version ======= #background_dhclient_fxp0="YES" # Start dhcp client on fxp0 in the background. synchronous_dhclient="YES" # Start dhclient directly on configured # interfaces during startup. >>>>>>> 6.3-RELEASE Then it asked about sendmail files which I have never ever touched (I do not use sendmail). Some others are not sendmail-related but I have not touched them either. /etc/mail/freebsd.cf /etc/mail/freebsd.mc /etc/mail/freebsd.submit.cf /etc/mail/freebsd.submit.mc /etc/mail/helpfile /etc/mail/sendmail.cf /etc/mail/submit.cf /etc/network.subr /etc/pccard_ether /etc/rc.d/ldconfig /etc/rc.d/mountcritlocal /etc/rc.d/moused /etc/rc.d/netif /etc/rc.d/nsswitch /etc/rc.d/ppp /etc/rc.d/ypxfrd /etc/rc.initdiskless /etc/rc.subr /etc/snmpd.config What would you advise me to do? I seem to remember I had a similar trouble going from 6.1 to 6.2. In that case I must have made some mistakes while merging changes because the machine wouldn't start. I seem to recall that I had to copy /etc from backup to make the machine work. I fear it may happen again and I am not really sure which part of the files I should be editing as - frankly - I have no idea what the changes are. Any advice? Many thanks in advance! Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 20:12:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BBD216A494 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:12:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from russo@bogodyn.org) Received: from mx1a.swcp.com (mx1a.swcp.com [216.184.2.64]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBCC313C448 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:12:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from russo@bogodyn.org) Received: from ame3.swcp.com (ame3.swcp.com [216.184.2.120]) by mx1a.swcp.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge3) with ESMTP id m0JK0Hn0027890 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:00:18 -0700 Received: from bogodyn.org (mail.bogodyn.org [69.49.164.40]) by ame3.swcp.com (8.14.1/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m0JK0En8015589 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:00:14 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from russo@bogodyn.org) Received: from bogodyn.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bogodyn.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m0JK0AFZ048492; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:00:10 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from russo@bogodyn.org) Received: (from russo@localhost) by bogodyn.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id m0JK0Adh048491; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:00:10 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from russo) Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:00:10 -0700 From: Tom Russo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080119200010.GA48420@bogodyn.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Organization: International Institute for Advanced Quantum Bogodynamical Studies User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=no version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on ame3.swcp.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 216.184.2.127 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (ame3.swcp.com [216.184.2.127]); Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:00:15 -0700 (MST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.2/5497/Sat Jan 19 10:22:49 2008 on ame3.swcp.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Level: Subject: X Forwarding problems since upgrading to 6-Stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: russo@bogodyn.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:12:26 -0000 I have three BSD machines running 6-Stable, all of them only recently upgraded from 5-STABLE. Ever since the upgrades, I cannot get remote hosts to which I've ssh'd to connect to the tunneled X server. For example: hostb> ssh -X hostA hosta> echo $DISPLAY localhost:10.0 hosta> xev Xlib: connection to "localhost:10.0" refused by server Xlib: Invalid MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 key xev: unable to open display 'localhost:10.0' hosta> exit hostb> ssh -Y hostA hosta> echo $DISPLAY localhost:10.0 hosta> xev Xlib: connection to "localhost:10.0" refused by server Xlib: Invalid MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 key xev: unable to open display 'localhost:10.0' If hosta is not a FreeBSD machine, the *OPPOSITE* attempt works fine. For example, if hosta is my linux laptop: hosta> ssh -X hostb hostb> echo $$DISPLAY localhost:10.0 hostb> xev [... xev starts up just fine and displays on the laptop...] But if the machine from which I'm sshing is one of my 6-stable BSD machines, it never works. All the 6-stable machines are running the latest ports, as I keep my ports tree csup'd and portupgrade regularly. I've googled the issue and the only thing I ever find is people answering "you should use -Y instead of -X to enable 'trusted' forwarding." This clearly doesn't work for me, either. Since I am not seeing tons of recent references to this all over the net, I am pretty much concluding that I must have some kind of configuration mistake on my BSD machines' X or ssh setups, but I don't immediately see one. I thought I left my sshd config pretty much as it was out of the box, but perhaps I screwed something up. Can anyone suggest a place to start looking for the error? -- Tom Russo KM5VY SAR502 DM64ux http://www.swcp.com/~russo/ Tijeras, NM QRPL#1592 K2#398 SOC#236 AHTB#1 http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?DDTNM "And, isn't sanity really just a one-trick pony anyway? I mean all you get is one trick, rational thinking, but when you're good and crazy, oooh, oooh, oooh, the sky is the limit!" --- The Tick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 20:52:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A7D616A419 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:52:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wahjava@gmail.com) Received: from po-out-1718.google.com (po-out-1718.google.com [72.14.252.152]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 000A213C442 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:52:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wahjava@gmail.com) Received: by po-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id b23so974053poe.3 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 12:52:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:to:cc:subject:x-face:references:x-pgp-fp:x-pgp:x-mailer:x-attribution:pgp:organization:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:face:mime-version:content-type:sender; bh=7IrEF/jbpu1mo7rc4PDFUN1Z0VxA9bMTv+65vfdtSck=; b=R00Jsj+bsAONG5vq3KA0b6hy/uMgmykXsGoKSIniWo1edjv+FwdH4BPY5PK3DRYymEz7ZiyWXd2JEiuIBfIsICV+MOKPOBL5Q5EdA5yrJrb/QHzgddnbzJ4uCijNf/4fdkUU2CnnEl6EI2OQoTjIxOA6NY0WJIrh65XUV8VBkIg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=to:cc:subject:x-face:references:x-pgp-fp:x-pgp:x-mailer:x-attribution:pgp:organization:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:face:mime-version:content-type:sender; b=g6ULCAyg67gOjH9q4OF3vYW7IHnkK0slYisLW5BYb4KhHAGaEzX7wVW548e8TAMY3IvGodXJLHxEXa51wv5EWjCTXsnLs1CbIkv6h2IrQ14/FM10I5/wEW24TzlBxnDk6jpI4lN3cDrgG1MvbhHFNK2jQEsAOWtn5v+EuvLvOKU= Received: by 10.140.164.1 with SMTP id m1mr3378636rve.266.1200775957593; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 12:52:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from chateau.d.lf ( [122.162.237.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f21sm833872rvb.15.2008.01.19.12.52.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 19 Jan 2008 12:52:37 -0800 (PST) To: Chris Whitehouse X-Face: "\:nMpJ)EA!j>2nEu-[(+&o:N+CtL^AS\, Jv*LO5qBr#W2.\=d X-PGP-FP: 1E00 4679 77E4 F8EE 2E4B 56F2 1F2F 8410 762E 5E74 X-PGP: 762E5E74 X-Mailer: Gnus/5.11 (Oort 5.11) Emacs/22.1.50.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Attribution: =?utf-8?B?4KSG4KS24KWA4KS3?= PGP: 762E5E74 Organization: /\/0/\/3 From: wahjava.ml@gmail.com (Ashish Shukla =?utf-8?B?4KSG4KS24KWA4KS3IA==?= =?utf-8?B?4KS24KWB4KSV4KWN4KSy?=) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 02:22:43 +0530 In-Reply-To: <47924869.2000909@onetel.com> (Chris Whitehouse's message of "Sat\, 19 Jan 2008 18\:58\:49 +0000") Message-ID: <877ii5fsh0.fsf@chateau.d.lf> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEVfX1/8/PwTExMDAwO0 tLSampr////f398oKCi/v78MDAwICAihq32EAAACU0lEQVQ4jW3UvWvbQBQA8LOJsJIsOajtZAtH Aqq8FLQUvNjhCex2UYpE7XYytPJalxJnFMImqrOkIJfcZtwGgrqEhELQ/XN9p+jLbc+Drfvx7r17 9jNxszXCV2mR9P3ACoKAOM5bugn1hRBRFAnxeErLMN4RIpbwYKwmZfgkMGDNol8PhlFrFDDalQcx BMMwXpwV8KElYqYzpmOA0a4UsC/EmrEU4ptGDq9kghTabP09g9EuFiSpJQOYXslgrEd6Aj8Q7pl+ kcFH3NRlUTIFfvyZwV4sEzwV20a4y2A/BWEYLxdYwk0Gn+Mohfa2X4bXsn8StC0uYdVI4T02cK0F is15ArcZYKeER5Q+f4JofZZHiPshJPt8BwtPrp4kF+KOp+sdpjvOjqpf3n+1bD6dTjk3ySKuZVU1 ezcdpm3h/pL4h9eP3Rw6R5bqa9t86a/1W3OVd7dpzgBMx8YAxVFgvgmqDTwEdQignOVgI1ggoQMA x40CFHzmCHgXcEoAig39MOSATTGt5znQL4qDIRIgNK2LAqYWAl47lBGDSgHNjoOt6vdDkNAtQc9E wN0EJgXQN7aMSABIGU7mMiI5CtQJzX9w9PwQYOApVqBwCMqwp9lmkKzh0qM5uPTAn/Vw0ogazK9m JRjR6pHqEVyqd1XbgPPfKkgAddClxRi49NmKcNMh+JV4T7mzqW1e2jwk3pAPjugGuCfHPLRIP/Qr tLEB9daW7HrvcLIx55i/9zjkfMlO//pnwLHyPcupzrL9AtxrFgTaN/dfGFcjreb+B9wmnzaKpz8p dKsBFjzeRQAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: =?UTF-8?B?4KSG4KS24KWA4KS3IOCktuClgeCkleCljeCksg==?= Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: localhost in sudoers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:52:38 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Pj4+Pj4gQ2hyaXMgV2hpdGVob3VzZSB3cml0ZXM6DQoNCiAgICBDaHJpcz4gVGhlIHByb2JsZW0g aXMgdGhpcyBtYWNoaW5lIGdldHMgaXRzIGlwIGFkZHJlc3MgYnkgZGhjcCBzbyBJIHNob3VsZG4n dA0KICAgIENocmlzPiBlbnRlciBhbiBpcCBpbiBzdWRvZXJzLiBJcyB0aGVyZSBhIG5lYXQgd2F5 IHJvdW5kIHRoaXM/DQoNCldoeSBub3QgdXNlIGhvc3RuYW1lIGZyb20gRE5TLCBpbnN0ZWFkLCBo bW0uLi4/DQoNCkhUSA0KLS0gDQpBc2hpc2ggU2h1a2xhIOCkhuCktuClgOCktyDgpLbgpYHgpJXg pY3gpLIgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgaHR0cDovL3dhaGphdmEud29yZHByZXNzLmNvbS8N CsK3LS0gwrctIMK3wrfCt8K3IMK3LS0tIMK3LSDCt8K3wrctIMK3LSDCty0twrctwrcgLS3CtyAt LSDCty0gwrfCtyDCty3Ct8K3IMK3LcK3LcK3LSAtwrctwrcgLS0tIC0tDQo= --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHkmMeHy+EEHYuXnQRAg02AKCB+zu/QiKexpJnKcurpdj7iPKYAgCgsuSw ZoS378j+9boFDlTEEzxGWfI= =Pxe6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 22:36:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFC8916A418 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:36:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from giorgio_v@mac.com) Received: from smtpoutm.mac.com (smtpoutm.mac.com [17.148.16.67]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C438713C469 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:36:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from giorgio_v@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (asmtp005-s [10.150.69.68]) by smtpoutm.mac.com (Xserve/smtpout004/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id m0JMaOqW020909 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:36:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.54] (88-149-177-167.static.ngi.it [88.149.177.167]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/asmtp005/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id m0JMaJFB014751 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:36:23 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753) To: freebsd-questions Message-Id: <70F64C4A-51CB-4301-B7C5-200FD8D5BC41@mac.com> From: Giorgio Valoti Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:35:42 +0100 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: portupgrade: the -P options rarely works X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:36:24 -0000 Hi all, I=92ve noticed that using the -P option with portupgrade, which should =20= try to fetch the binary version of a package rarely works. Most of =20 the times it tries to fetch the package from the freebsd site, it =20 fails and then proceed to build it from the sources. While I can expect from to time that a pre-compiled version of a =20 package to be unavailable, it surprises me to see this so many times. Thank you -- Giorgio Valoti From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 22:50:25 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D7A16A41A for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:50:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de) Received: from mailgw27.noc.fraunhofer.de (mailgw2-out.fraunhofer.de [153.96.1.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68E0113C448 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:50:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de) Received: from mailgw27.noc.fraunhofer.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw27.noc.fraunhofer.de (8.13.5+/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m0JMXN9a014361; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:33:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from pluto.fokus.fraunhofer.de (pluto.fokus.fraunhofer.de [195.37.77.164]) by mailgw27.noc.fraunhofer.de (8.13.5+/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m0JMWsnK012859 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:33:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from EXCHSRV.fokus.fraunhofer.de (bohr [10.147.9.231]) by pluto.fokus.fraunhofer.de (8.13.7/8.13.7) with SMTP id m0JMMwfE008165; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:22:58 +0100 (MET) Received: from rigel ([10.147.65.195]) by EXCHSRV.fokus.fraunhofer.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:22:58 +0100 Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:22:58 +0100 From: Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, bob89@wb4jcm.org Message-ID: <47927842.9laQQcD/42mYWXA0%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> User-Agent: nail 11.22 3/20/05 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Jan 2008 22:22:58.0446 (UTC) FILETIME=[D8655AE0:01C85AE9] X-Fraunhofer-Email-Policy: accepted Cc: Subject: Re: Wrong times written by mkisofs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:50:26 -0000 > Irecently built a CD of images to give to a friend. I noticed the timestamps > displayed when I list the CD contents are five hours earlier than they should > be. Five hours matches my GMT offset. This is a dual-boot system with Win XP, > so the hardware clock is set to local time. > E.g. a file on my hard drive has a correct timestamp > -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 2246671 Jan 19 12:22 IMG_0660_080115_2348.JPG > while the same file on the resulting CD looks like > -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 2246671 Jan 19 07:22 IMG_0660_080115_2348.JPG > The "date" command returns the correct local time. > Did I do something incorrectly, or is this a bug in mkisofs? It appears to me > that mkisofs decided to correct for GMT offset when it shouldn't have. > The sequence of operations I followed is below. Let me asume you use a _recent_ mkisofs and set up a correct timezone... Then you found a FreeBSD kernel bug in your filesystem code. BTW: The first bug I found in mkisofs (this was in 1995) was a TZ bug and mkisofs did use the wrong sign for the timezone offset. Since this has been fixed, the only reported problems where in effect +- 24 hours from New-year. What do you get from "mkisofs -version"? What timezone do you have (how many hours from GMT and which location)? What do you have in the TZ= variable? What do you see with "TZ=GMT ls -l ToJoe"? Jrg -- EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jrg Schilling D-13353 Berlin js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 23:18:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96C216A418 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:18:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from smtp.utwente.nl (unknown [IPv6:2001:610:1908:1000:204:23ff:feb5:7e66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32B7613C448 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:18:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from lux.student.utwente.nl (lux.student.utwente.nl [130.89.170.81]) by smtp.utwente.nl (8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m0JNIXtS010265; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:18:34 +0100 From: Pieter de Goeje To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:18:33 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <70F64C4A-51CB-4301-B7C5-200FD8D5BC41@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <70F64C4A-51CB-4301-B7C5-200FD8D5BC41@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801200018.33454.pieter@degoeje.nl> X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact servicedesk@icts.utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UTwente-MailScanner-From: pieter@degoeje.nl X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Giorgio Valoti Subject: Re: portupgrade: the -P options rarely works X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:18:41 -0000 On Saturday 19 January 2008, Giorgio Valoti wrote: > Hi all, > I=92ve noticed that using the -P option with portupgrade, which should > try to fetch the binary version of a package rarely works. Most of > the times it tries to fetch the package from the freebsd site, it > fails and then proceed to build it from the sources. > While I can expect from to time that a pre-compiled version of a > package to be unavailable, it surprises me to see this so many times. > > > Thank you > -- > Giorgio Valoti This is expected, since the packages are built from the ports tree. Thus=20 binary packages are always late. -P is most useful when distributing your o= wn=20 centrally built packages. =2D Pieter de Goeje From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 23:19:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8A916A420 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:19:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C5A813C467; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:19:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <47928564.1050602@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:19:00 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Giorgio Valoti References: <70F64C4A-51CB-4301-B7C5-200FD8D5BC41@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <70F64C4A-51CB-4301-B7C5-200FD8D5BC41@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: portupgrade: the -P options rarely works X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:19:02 -0000 Giorgio Valoti wrote: > Hi all, > Ive noticed that using the -P option with portupgrade, which should try > to fetch the binary version of a package rarely works. Most of the times > it tries to fetch the package from the freebsd site, it fails and then > proceed to build it from the sources. > While I can expect from to time that a pre-compiled version of a package > to be unavailable, it surprises me to see this so many times. We can not guarantee that a given package is available at any given moment, except during release cycles when the tree is frozen. The continual process of changes and updates mean that from time to time a randomly selected package may not be buildable. However, taken as a whole, almost all of the packages are available at any given moment. You can check the status for yourself on http://pointyhat.freebsd.org if you like. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 23:20:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6742F16A46B; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:20:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A7A13C457; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:20:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <479285BB.30700@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:20:27 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <70F64C4A-51CB-4301-B7C5-200FD8D5BC41@mac.com> <47928564.1050602@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <47928564.1050602@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Giorgio Valoti , freebsd-questions Subject: Re: portupgrade: the -P options rarely works X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:20:28 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > Giorgio Valoti wrote: >> Hi all, >> Ive noticed that using the -P option with portupgrade, which should >> try to fetch the binary version of a package rarely works. Most of the >> times it tries to fetch the package from the freebsd site, it fails >> and then proceed to build it from the sources. >> While I can expect from to time that a pre-compiled version of a >> package to be unavailable, it surprises me to see this so many times. > > We can not guarantee that a given package is available at any given > moment, except during release cycles when the tree is frozen. The > continual process of changes and updates mean that from time to time a > randomly selected package may not be buildable. However, taken as a > whole, almost all of the packages are available at any given moment. You > can check the status for yourself on http://pointyhat.freebsd.org if you > like. > > Kris > It is also worth remembering that there are a number of packages (including some popular ones) that we cannot distribute for legal reasons, due to the restrictive licenses imposed by the authors. These will never be available for download via portupgrade -P. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 23:22:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ADBD16A417 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:22:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from authentec@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.236]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C3CF13C455 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:22:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from authentec@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so859830wxd.7 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:22:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=P8j1El+S3MRdr9gLZxs7x7Jhk+kURbKMc5iZWhnaJsQ=; b=W3gS+QpkzDJa/SSeWtf2B94eS6BeeI3TQn3JlLjC2IeZsAH3mS9XG2O/OUsJnSuSy4lVeUkortDMazu7a71jJ7oXYtep0BvIEqTjDcuaJODQL3pS+1r2qfpN5BNg9F4/LHL269zmO6xKD4YgQTXcTjTgtr7/6vTFWonsPXWxoZk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=xKLqjsaqigT8oAOMf3vHateZSVfm8sQvezHl3L68iNlm1RzR0pD9lNUvl08MEWROd7thY4PfWgaobOKOwmzzwlh6SAoHDbY7zkKTUChai3T2ep4iBqKZJPATntaKt0m1WEqw16wT+0E60mv9GKItBj+DUjZVNbc6UZIYdUPlNcM= Received: by 10.70.39.18 with SMTP id m18mr3294441wxm.50.1200784966206; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:22:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from Samson.home.net ( [69.177.150.191]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i20sm18979180wxd.2.2008.01.19.15.22.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:22:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <47928642.2090707@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:22:42 -0500 From: Greg Mars User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080104) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Realtek 8111B LAN Chipset X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:22:47 -0000 I'm buying parts for a computer and want to make sure that the core components are as freebsd friendly as possible. So far, I've decided on a core 2 quad q6600 and I'm choosing the motherboard now. However it seems many of the popular motherboards have Realtek ALC888 as built-in audio and Realtek 8111B as built-in LAN. I read at: http://www.freebsd.org/relnotes/CURRENT/hardware/i386/article.html that the sound should work but I couldn't find any info on the LAN. Does anyone on the list have any experience with it? By the way, I'm going to run FreeBSD 7. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 23:40:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 645D416A46C for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:40:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwhiteh@onetel.com) Received: from smtp1.bethere.co.uk (smtp1.betherenow.co.uk [87.194.0.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 339C213C46A for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:40:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwhiteh@onetel.com) Received: from [192.168.1.71] (87-194-3-32.bethere.co.uk [87.194.3.32]) by smtp1.bethere.co.uk (Postfix) with SMTP id 76A7398032 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:40:35 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <47928A73.2040904@onetel.com> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:40:35 +0000 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071228) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <47924869.2000909@onetel.com> <877ii5fsh0.fsf@chateau.d.lf> In-Reply-To: <877ii5fsh0.fsf@chateau.d.lf> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: localhost in sudoers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:40:37 -0000 Ashish Shukla आशीष शुक्ल wrote: >>>>>> Chris Whitehouse writes: > > Chris> The problem is this machine gets its ip address by dhcp so I shouldn't > Chris> enter an ip in sudoers. Is there a neat way round this? > > Why not use hostname from DNS, instead, hmm...? > > HTH I'm not sure what you mean. This computer is on a local network behind a nat box and doesn't have a dns entry. %host 192.168.1.71 71.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer eco.config. %host localhost localhost has address 127.0.0.1 I think my question really is why doesn't sudoers recognise localhost or 127.0.0.1? Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 23:50:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6425B16A41A for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:50:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+SJ=dd5dfa55@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from turtle-out.mxes.net (turtle-out.mxes.net [216.86.168.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3886113C45B for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:50:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+SJ=dd5dfa55@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by turtle-in.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E5C163F6D for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:21:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40C02D059E for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:21:03 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:21:00 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080119232100.7fc1c195@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <4791A8F3.7090601@highperformance.net> References: <478F0D5A.9090107@highperformance.net> <20080117081414.GB12470@draenor.org> <478F1049.3000706@boosten.org> <20080117083837.GC12470@draenor.org> <20080117094332.K1563@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080117090210.GD12470@draenor.org> <478F8980.1090301@highperformance.net> <20080118175831.72929086@gumby.homeunix.com.> <4791A8F3.7090601@highperformance.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.5; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Gutmann Method on Empty Space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:50:21 -0000 On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:38:27 -0800 "Jason C. Wells" wrote: > It's interesting to note that Gutmann's earlier work said, loosely > "If you do this, you should be fairly certain you data is > unrecoverable." He now says, "A few passes of random data is as good > as can be expected." Those two standards of performance are very > different. But he goes on to say: "Looking at this from the other point of view, with the ever-increasing data density on disk platters and a corresponding reduction in feature size and use of exotic techniques to record data on the medium, it's unlikely that anything can be recovered from any recent drive except perhaps a single level via basic error-cancelling techniques." So even those few passes of random data are overkill. > I just want to make sure that any given day that the police > come take my functioning computers way that nothing can be recovered > that I explicitly deleted. The police just take disk images.