From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 2 09:14:03 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 807EA37B401; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 09:14:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81DC243F3F; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 09:14:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h52GDwVm089352; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 09:13:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h52GDuRr089351; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 09:13:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 09:13:56 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Message-ID: <20030602161356.GA89038@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200306020029.h520TZwK088820@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.1-BETA Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/include profile.h X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 16:14:04 -0000 On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 10:56:15AM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > "David E. O'Brien" writes: > > Log: > > Use C99 compatable asm statements. > > Wrong. The keyword reserved by C99 for inline assembly is asm, not > __asm. J.5.10 _The_asm_keyword_ The 'asm' keyword may be used to insert assembly language directly into the translator output (6.8). The most common implementation is via a statement of the form: asm ( 'character-string-literal' ) ; my read is that the compiler *may* implement it as above, or it may use something different. Since GCC uses ("character-string-literal" : : ); I guess they decided GCC isn't compatable with J.5.10. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)