From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Sep 7 6:49:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from t-mta1.odn.ne.jp (mfep1.odn.ne.jp [143.90.131.179]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294EC37B424 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2000 06:49:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from athena.shige.org ([210.188.10.71]) by t-mta1.odn.ne.jp (InterMail vM.4.01.02.27 201-229-119-110) with ESMTP id <20000907134953790.EFSE.880.t-mta1.odn.ne.jp@mta1.odn.ne.jp>; Thu, 7 Sep 2000 22:49:53 +0900 To: kiri@pis.toba-cmt.ac.jp Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsd.ruby.mk, bsd.gnome.mk, ... etc. From: Shigeyuki Fukushima (=?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCSiFFZ0xQRzcbKEI=?=) In-Reply-To: <200009050109.e8519VG20062@pis.toba-cmt.ac.jp> References: <200009050109.e8519VG20062@pis.toba-cmt.ac.jp> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.95b3 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 =?iso-2022-jp?B?KBskQjJWMWMbKEIp?= Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2000 22:49:41 +0900 X-Dispatcher: imput version 990905(IM130) Lines: 20 Message-Id: <20000907134953790.EFSE.880.t-mta1.odn.ne.jp@mta1.odn.ne.jp> Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org From: kiri@pis.toba-cmt.ac.jp Subject: Re: bsd.ruby.mk, bsd.gnome.mk, ... etc. Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2000 10:09:31 +0900 > At Sat, 19 Feb 2000 21:24:10 +0100 (CET), > Juergen Lock wrote: > > I think that bsd.emacs.mk does not need to rename. :) Is this right? ;) > But according to scheme of inclusion bsd.*.mk files by > category_name, it takes to rename whether elisp to emacs or > bsd.emacs.mk to bsd.elisp.mk. > # I think it better to the former. If we take bsd..mk policy, shall we rename category from "elisp" to "emacs"? --- shige To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message