Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 4 Mar 2011 15:15:36 -0800
From:      David Brodbeck <gull@gull.us>
To:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Purchased Binaries
Message-ID:  <AANLkTi=N_dv=x+X5w-r2CeoQA2XnQdqhELyhEHpeyx17@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <98DE64E1-EE7F-4B52-A204-A2AF70005FDE@lafn.org>
References:  <5F4DD89C-5F3B-46B8-BA91-A25B8BF11EEB@lafn.org> <20110304224553.GD28710@comcast.net> <98DE64E1-EE7F-4B52-A204-A2AF70005FDE@lafn.org>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Doug Hardie <bc979@lafn.org> wrote:
> Pretty much I will have the real software on Monday and will need to get =
it up and going very quickly. =A0I want to use FreeBSD because all the othe=
r parts of what he needs I already have running on various FreeBSD servers.=
 =A0Also, I very much like the FreeBSD approach (like to pf) of don't break=
 things that previously worked without workarounds so that production syste=
ms are not killed.

The only problem I can see -- assuming it runs at all -- is that any
tech support contracts for the software will likely assume you're
running it under Linux.  They may not be happy trying to troubleshoot
it under FreeBSD and may want to blame the OS for any problems you
encounter.  I try to run commercial software on "officially supported"
operating systems just for that reason.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTi=N_dv=x+X5w-r2CeoQA2XnQdqhELyhEHpeyx17>