Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 18:41:11 -0600 From: Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Good Terminal for X? Message-ID: <20100808004111.GA42550@guilt.hydra> In-Reply-To: <20100806201247.GA6715@saltmine.radix.net> References: <4C5BC3DB.4080406@gmail.com> <20100806092610.GA14470@slackbox.erewhon.net> <20100806201247.GA6715@saltmine.radix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 04:12:47PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 11:26:10AM +0200, Roland Smith wrote: > >=20 > > Try x11/rxvt-unicode. It doesn't require Gnome nor KDE libraries, and i= t does > > handle unicode well. It's a lot lighter than xterm. And it has transpar= ancy or > > backgrounds if you like that. >=20 > It's not "a lot lighter" - I made a table recently to investigate. > See >=20 > http://invisible-island.net/xterm/xterm.faq.html#bug_rxvt Thanks for the research. I had no idea rxvt-unicode had gotten so big. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkxd/ScACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKW+EACfVrfkYw3StWTfr8o9P7fmQE3x NMkAnRUwYzopO140j4o4KzrGh6HogJz5 =Gwdw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100808004111.GA42550>