Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 28 Oct 2020 17:02:09 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        net@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC
Message-ID:  <bug-248652-7501-8RyELPGJQa@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-248652-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-248652-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248652

--- Comment #43 from Sylvain Galliano <sg@efficientip.com> ---
I made same tests on vmware + vmxnet NIC + latest patch and I got a panic:

spin lock 0xfffff80003079cc0 (turnstile lock) held by 0xfffffe0009607e00 (t=
id
100006) too long
panic: spin lock held too long
cpuid =3D 1
time =3D 1603884508
KDB: stack backtrace:
db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2b/frame 0xfffffe0008480=
680
vpanic() at vpanic+0x182/frame 0xfffffe00084806d0
panic() at panic+0x43/frame 0xfffffe0008480730
_mtx_lock_indefinite_check() at _mtx_lock_indefinite_check+0x64/frame
0xfffffe0008480740
_mtx_lock_spin_cookie() at _mtx_lock_spin_cookie+0xd5/frame 0xfffffe0008480=
7b0
turnstile_trywait() at turnstile_trywait+0xe3/frame 0xfffffe00084807e0
__mtx_lock_sleep() at __mtx_lock_sleep+0x119/frame 0xfffffe0008480870
doselwakeup() at doselwakeup+0x179/frame 0xfffffe00084808c0
nm_os_selwakeup() at nm_os_selwakeup+0x13/frame 0xfffffe00084808e0
netmap_notify() at netmap_notify+0x3d/frame 0xfffffe0008480900
softclock_call_cc() at softclock_call_cc+0x13d/frame 0xfffffe00084809a0
callout_process() at callout_process+0x1c0/frame 0xfffffe0008480a10
handleevents() at handleevents+0x188/frame 0xfffffe0008480a50
timercb() at timercb+0x24e/frame 0xfffffe0008480aa0
lapic_handle_timer() at lapic_handle_timer+0x9b/frame 0xfffffe0008480ad0
Xtimerint() at Xtimerint+0xb1/frame 0xfffffe0008480ad0
--- interrupt, rip =3D 0xffffffff80f5bd46, rsp =3D 0xfffffe0008480ba0, rbp =
=3D
0xfffffe0008480ba0 ---
acpi_cpu_c1() at acpi_cpu_c1+0x6/frame 0xfffffe0008480ba0
acpi_cpu_idle() at acpi_cpu_idle+0x2eb/frame 0xfffffe0008480bf0
cpu_idle_acpi() at cpu_idle_acpi+0x3e/frame 0xfffffe0008480c10
cpu_idle() at cpu_idle+0x9f/frame 0xfffffe0008480c30
sched_idletd() at sched_idletd+0x2e4/frame 0xfffffe0008480cf0
fork_exit() at fork_exit+0x7e/frame 0xfffffe0008480d30
fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0xe/frame 0xfffffe0008480d30
--- trap 0, rip =3D 0, rsp =3D 0, rbp =3D 0 ---

I used the first patch you sent (Draft patch to test the netmap tx timer), =
no
issue this time.

the only major difference I can see between 2 patches (except sysctl) is:
+               txq->ift_timer.c_cpu =3D cpu;
and
+               txq->ift_netmap_timer.c_cpu =3D cpu;

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-248652-7501-8RyELPGJQa>