From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Feb  8 06:53:46 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id GAA23470
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 8 Feb 1996 06:53:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tfs.com (tfs.com [140.145.250.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id GAA23464
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 8 Feb 1996 06:53:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from critter.tfs.com by tfs.com (smail3.1.28.1) with SMTP
	id m0tkXjD-0003w4C; Thu, 8 Feb 96 06:53 PST
Received: from localhost.tfs.com (localhost.tfs.com [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id PAA00473; Thu, 8 Feb 1996 15:53:42 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: critter.tfs.com: Host localhost.tfs.com didn't use HELO protocol
To: Julian Elischer <julian@ref.tfs.com>
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: TERRY patches.. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 07 Feb 1996 03:18:02 PST."
             <199602071118.DAA00521@ref.tfs.com> 
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 1996 15:53:42 +0100
Message-ID: <471.823791222@critter.tfs.com>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> I like the namei/lookup addition of the EXCLUDE 
> flag.  Seems good to me.. the moving of some functionality from filesystems
> to common code is a good idea.
yes, I like this part.

> The reworking of mount() is ingenious, but I think we should not
> impliment much of it.
agree.

> I think 'cosmetic reworks' should be avoided, as it tends to:
> 1/ make it harder to merge/compare code
> 2/ obfuscate the real nature of the change.
agree.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp           | phk@FreeBSD.ORG       FreeBSD Core-team.
http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk    Private mailbox.
whois: [PHK]                | phk@ref.tfs.com       TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.