Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 00:39:15 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Jacob <mj@feral.com> To: Harti Brandt <harti@FreeBSD.org> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org, Matthew Jacob <mj@feral.com>, sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 Message-ID: <20060202003821.K82118@ns1.feral.com> In-Reply-To: <20060202093623.H56261@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> References: <20060201165326.6E44E7302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20060201180223.O52964@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <43E0F41C.5020907@samsco.org> <86fyn242w0.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060202002644.M82118@ns1.feral.com> <20060202093623.H56261@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > MJ>Is the tinderbox still failing? I haven't seen that mail- maybe I'm not on > MJ>the list it's being sent to? > > You may look into either stable@ or spar64@ Ah. I'm subscribed to neither. Okay- thanks for the headsup that it's still broken. I have a slow 420R making its way thru an updated LINT tree right now.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060202003821.K82118>