From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 6 14:51:33 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E037106567C for ; Tue, 6 May 2008 14:51:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from z@zlo.nu) Received: from mzh.zlo.nu (ns0.zlo.nu [85.17.141.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F3AA8FC18 for ; Tue, 6 May 2008 14:51:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from z@zlo.nu) Received: by mzh.zlo.nu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A931A143D7; Tue, 6 May 2008 16:51:31 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 16:51:31 +0200 From: Marc Olzheim To: Lukasz Jaroszewski Message-ID: <20080506145131.GA24882@zlo.nu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: utmp.h: UT_HOSTSIZE X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 14:51:33 -0000 On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 03:11:35PM +0200, Lukasz Jaroszewski wrote: > just by curiosity, why #define UT_HOSTSIZE is 16, not 256, like in > OtherBSDs and some unix-like-like OSes? :) Probably historical reasons. It's very much possible to change it though. We've defined it to 64 since FreeBSD 2.05 and never really had any trouble. Marc