Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 13:41:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@sneakerz.org> Cc: <smp@FreeBSD.ORG>, <audit@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: planned change to mbinit code and minor changes to mp startup Message-ID: <20010714134008.F29314-100000@wonky.feral.com> In-Reply-To: <20010714132629.D29314-100000@wonky.feral.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The more I look at the resource wastage for allocating for CPUs that aren't active, the more I think that this is not right. You're going to suck down not only maps but filled buckets. I would appreciate further discussion on this. -matt On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > One other note: > > > The mbuf subsystem shouldn't look for holes/sparseness in the > > number of cpus. > > I'm not sure you understood the dense/sparse issue. > > CPUID != #cpus, so in order to keep your semantics of mp_ncpus equal the > maxmimum possible # cpus, mp_ncpus will equal, perforce, the highest possible > cpuid. > > -matt > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010714134008.F29314-100000>