Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 28 Jun 2006 04:37:49 -0400
From:      Francisco Reyes <lists@stringsutils.com>
To:        Marc =?ISO-8859-1?B?Ry4=?= Fournier <scrappy@hub.org>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Are hardware vendors starting to bail on FreeBSD ... ?
Message-ID:  <cone.1151483869.677488.14057.5001@35st-server.simplicato.com>
References:  <20060620060845.U1114@ganymede.hub.org> <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNOECCFEAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com> <ef10de9a0606211118v43e0c3f4g1631c6c617bb6970@mail.gmail.com> <20060621183832.H1114@ganymede.hub.org> <ef10de9a0606211523h566b86c7u636889d826ce38e5@mail.gmail.com> <20060621195523.I1114@ganymede.hub.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Marc G. Fournier writes:

> b. are ppl actually using/promoting SATA drives in a server environment?

I think for a small company there is little choice if you need serious 
capacity on a budget.

300GB SATA.. in the $150 and lower
300GB 10K RPM SCSI $650 and up

$500 difference per drive.
2U with 8 drives: 4,000 Difference.

Not to mention you can get 750GB SATA drives cheaper than 300GB SCSI.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cone.1151483869.677488.14057.5001>