Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 18:44:51 -0700 From: Brad Walker <bwalker@musings.com> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> Cc: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org" <freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ? about kernel size.. Message-ID: <CAPKZHbVoaD0rGzpYaOadu9iZ-QCfDvN2qBM4mwUWUk3Fp0o%2Bcw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmonHkXmUKvYJ%2BJTiCG%2B8KZ-gOvJ-C5iXGMs3r5GpdwhaDQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAPKZHbVyPji-bZwDzM77TN6qybjRcf%2BZe5r6WZmbG98LkhT-rg@mail.gmail.com> <CANCZdfriqr24Lh9ZuptaC0gEm6gAV6LN9XHcVAJtbyaBejEgNg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPKZHbW%2BG7WnSU__yeYBVPqs8MPmFm-5q_wM4sm9FxHhEEgPDg@mail.gmail.com> <1457473674.1406.46.camel@freebsd.org> <CAPKZHbX8BXKC_=8PPvtasqE%2BRj96_mPQkqdRt=hqU6fazxpPfA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmo=yW0=VHkjed8NYxRmE7dqtd8=bN8KLmav9-bBEZ-U1YQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPKZHbV1D5hTXCCRAYy6XkkcqJEizHH8ymK5dgsCsvXEeRd5jQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmonHkXmUKvYJ%2BJTiCG%2B8KZ-gOvJ-C5iXGMs3r5GpdwhaDQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
That is a thought.. And for some projects it definitely makes sense. But, the ease with which one can work in a modern kernel is a pretty strong motivator these days. My god, the tiny processors are mostly 32 bit these days. I'm working on a ColdFire (68000 knock off) and it's 32bits and feature reach for an embedded processor. Even looking at the embedded processors for FPGAs are relatively robust. -brad w. On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> wrote: > Right. So grab something that already exists, like ECOS or RTEMS. > > (They use FreeBSD bits iirc..) > > > -a >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPKZHbVoaD0rGzpYaOadu9iZ-QCfDvN2qBM4mwUWUk3Fp0o%2Bcw>