From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 18 08:11:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC40A106566C; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 08:11:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from atte.peltomaki@iki.fi) Received: from kameli.org (kameli.org [83.150.86.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E258FC0C; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 08:11:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kameli.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D556211F81E; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:11:40 +0300 (EEST) Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:11:40 +0300 From: Atte =?iso-8859-1?Q?Peltom=E4ki?= To: Outback Dingo Message-ID: <20120618081140.GK96212@ass.kameli.org> References: <20120615124849.GI96212@ass.kameli.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" , Richard Yao , openrc@gentoo.org, Nathan Whitehorn Subject: Re: Replacing rc(8) (Was: FreeBSD Boot Times) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 08:11:48 -0000 On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 03:43:37PM -0400, Outback Dingo wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Atte Peltomäki wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 02:09:38PM -0400, Richard Yao wrote: > >> Also, I am certain that the OpenRC developers would be thrilled if > >> FreeBSD adopted OpenRC. If FreeBSD core is interested in OpenRC, feel > >> free to contact the OpenRC and/or the Gentoo FreeBSD developers. We > >> would all love to see OpenRC in upstream FreeBSD. > > > > Replacing rc(8) has a lot of risks and not many benefits. Current system > > is somewhat limited, but it works, it's simple to understand and > > everyone already knows it and uses it. > > > > Solaris SMF is by far the most advanced bootup/service manager I've come > > across, [...] > > > > Personally, as much as I like power of SMF, I think FreeBSD devs have > > much more important (and interesting) things to do. > > Theres always Launchd also......... Launchd is strikingly similar to SMF, which probably isn't a coincidence, knowing how much other code Apple pulled from Solaris during those days. -- Atte Peltomäki atte.peltomaki@iki.fi <> http://kameli.org "Your effort to remain what you are is what limits you"