Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 24 Feb 2011 22:34:11 -0430
From:      Andres Perera <andres.p@zoho.com>
To:        Rob Farmer <rfarmer@predatorlabs.net>
Cc:        Chip Camden <sterling@camdensoftware.com>, "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Backtick versus $()
Message-ID:  <AANLkTik=MvD6qhpOUcxfKn2qxGofxaEM0DGuGm6C-yvo@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinQJkgybrwRW3mSW7Ypu=NWoxscyGopyRE0nbW8@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <AANLkTikAB--0Hrw76cbdzgfmeJMPt_N7isaw%2Byn_-QMn@mail.gmail.com> <20110224234044.0df661c1.freebsd@edvax.de> <20110224225425.GB13490@guilt.hydra> <20110225001301.e4f6d95f.freebsd@edvax.de> <21929_1298589484_4D66E72C_21929_309_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499BD35499F@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> <AANLkTinu1KB=Lz7rsH5TiZXHr61gH8AWFP=quJ9=8iJH@mail.gmail.com> <20110224232404.GA13838@guilt.hydra> <AANLkTik0r5skC0vn0OAGX1_MQDMdsrTK3943iF_rwNzD@mail.gmail.com> <20110225002644.GA14159@guilt.hydra> <AANLkTikBAtV-Yav0oxGaGejmbSdRN4Q3XDCdtdBWBSoP@mail.gmail.com> <20110225010037.GA25929@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <AANLkTimb2dbn8ufyzFharRcFTnhpSGQxcm03FFMgMRhV@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinQJkgybrwRW3mSW7Ypu=NWoxscyGopyRE0nbW8@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Rob Farmer <rfarmer@predatorlabs.net> wro=
te:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Andres Perera <andres.p@zoho.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Chip Camden
>> <sterling@camdensoftware.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterling@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F
>>> http://chipsquips.com =C2=A0| http://camdensoftware.com =C2=A0 | http:/=
/chipstips.com
>>>
>>
>> btw, would you stop putting ads on your signature? it's annoying
>>
>
> LOL - how hypocritical. This thread was four days dead then suddenly
> two people show up and start pushing this mksh shell, which seems to
> be part of some obscure OpenBSD fork. If anyone is "advertising" it's
> you.

actually, *any* modern ksh variant, including both oksh and mksh would be
better than tcsh as default shell. both would be a huge improvement over th=
e
rotting pile of poop that is tcsh

and if you're going to qualify, you better know wtf you're talking about,
because mksh is used by android and red hat

the only major os, excluding variants, with tcsh on the base system is free=
bsd

nevermind that the tcsh comparison was done way before anyone explained mks=
h...

noob

>
> --
> Rob Farmer
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTik=MvD6qhpOUcxfKn2qxGofxaEM0DGuGm6C-yvo>