Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 30 May 2009 11:42:57 -0500
From:      Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To:        Mel Flynn <mel.flynn+fbsd.ports@mailing.thruhere.net>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Policy on removed ports
Message-ID:  <20090530164257.GA14079@lonesome.com>
In-Reply-To: <200905301648.15697.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.ports@mailing.thruhere.net>
References:  <200905301648.15697.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.ports@mailing.thruhere.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 04:48:15PM +0200, Mel Flynn wrote:
> but what is the general policy on such ports?

They can come back if they're not vulnerable and someone volunteers
to maintain them.  (deleted ports may have had ports@ as the maintainer,
but we don't allow that for port (re)additions.)

We have ports that get marked vulnerable and then get updated and
fixed all the time.  It's just when someone doesn't update them that
they go away :-)

mcl



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090530164257.GA14079>