Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 9 Aug 2007 09:35:20 +0400 (GST)
From:      Rakhesh Sasidharan <rakhesh@rakhesh.com>
To:        "Philip M. Gollucci" <philip@riderway.com>
Cc:        "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: No updates needed to update system to 6.2-RELEASE-p7?
Message-ID:  <20070809092552.K93573@obelix.home.rakhesh.com>
In-Reply-To: <46BA188E.5050606@riderway.com>
References:  <20070808222628.B49848@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> <0B124FFF-D212-4373-9D58-9F65A1E4E64A@mac.com> <20070808230920.R53363@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> <46BA188E.5050606@riderway.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help

Philip M. Gollucci wrote:

>> I see. Thanks. Didn't realize that only when the kernel gets updated does
>> the suffix change to -p7. I was under the impression that all updates
>> change the kernel string to -p7 just to show that there's been some
>> updates.
> That actually sounds like a bad thing IMHO.  Because not -p4 is not -p4
> -p4 = -p7 but for others it might =-p5 depending on the last time they
> updated.
>
> It might be nice to have freebsd-update update this portion of the
> kernel even if thats the only part thats updated.

I second that. Was confusing to me atleast, and I kept wondering all this 
file if something was wrong with my setup. Would be nice if the kernel was 
given a version bump to -p7 or whatever. Maybe its not possible for other 
practical reasons, in which perhaps the man page could mention this fact?

By the way, is there some way I can verify that my system has been patched 
for the newer updates? (Just so that I get the nagging feeling off my head 
that something's not alright). Some way I can check the named executable 
for instance to see its the latest ...?

Thanks,
Rakhesh




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070809092552.K93573>