Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:12:07 +0100 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Jason Evans <jasone@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: New malloc ready, take 42 Message-ID: <26940.1135332727@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:05:03 %2B0800." <43ABCBCF.8060500@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <43ABCBCF.8060500@freebsd.org>, David Xu writes: >If I have linked " aj>>>>>>>" to /etc/malloc.conf for phkmalloc, the >super-smack get better result, on my Pentium-D 2.8Ghz machine, >before this set, the select-key.smack can only reach 19500 q_per_s, >after the set, it can reach 20791.33 q_per_s ! yes, this is not suprising. >The '>' option should be supported in jemalloc because mysql relies >on it. That is indeed a strange usage of the word "relies" and it sort of indicates that you don't even have the foggiest notion about what the '>' option does in phkmalloc. Maybe a reading of the relevant manual page might be in order ? Poul-Henning -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?26940.1135332727>