Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 12:36:54 -0400 From: Dan Moschuk <dan@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> Cc: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: problem building modules for release. Message-ID: <20000615123654.J1043@spirit.jaded.net> In-Reply-To: <20000615093140.L18462@fw.wintelcom.net>; from bright@wintelcom.net on Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 09:31:40AM -0700 References: <20000615090242.A32679@dragon.nuxi.com> <20000615093140.L18462@fw.wintelcom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
| > Now that we've had a taste of both ways, I have two questions of people: | > | > 1. Should the symbol be MODULES_WITH_KERNEL or MODULES_WITH_WORLD, (or | > something else)? | > | > 2. Which should be the default? Building modules with world or kernel. | | I haven't see an "oops my modules and kernel are out of sync" mail since | the change. The extra time it takes to build is a bit annoying but very | worth the protection it allows. | | I'd stick with building the modules along with the kernel. I would definately keep it in the kernel build rather than the world build. Yes, it takes a few more minutes building a kernel, but there is always make -DNO_MODULES. -- Dan Moschuk (TFreak!dan@freebsd.org) "Meep meep!" - Roadrunner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000615123654.J1043>