From owner-freebsd-current Wed Dec 15 13: 4:42 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mail.enteract.com (mail.enteract.com [207.229.143.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A1EA1553B for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 13:04:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dscheidt@enteract.com) Received: from shell-1.enteract.com (dscheidt@shell-1.enteract.com [207.229.143.40]) by mail.enteract.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA22713; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 15:04:26 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dscheidt@enteract.com) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 15:04:25 -0600 (CST) From: David Scheidt To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: Warner Losh , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Init Re: MAKEDEV (Re: Speaking of moving files (Re: make world broken building fortunes ) ) ) In-Reply-To: <12188.945290928@critter.freebsd.dk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <199912152044.NAA63531@harmony.village.org>, Warner Losh writes: > > I would really like to see the devd functionality to live in init > and at the same time I wouldn't mind if init were taught to keep > important programs running, things like sshd, inetd, syslogd and > similar should be restarted if they die. > > No, I don't want sysV runlevels or the weird shit AIX has. I'm sure > a clean and sensible way can be found, if some mental energies are > poured into the problem. What's wrong with run with system V runlevels? Other than it's system V and everything AT^HUSL did is evil, of course. David To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message