Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 11:13:52 +0100 From: "Nuno Antunes" <nuno.antunes@gmail.com> To: "Tom Judge" <tom@tomjudge.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, "Bruce M. Simpson" <bms@freebsd.org>, Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Strange behaviour of route command Message-ID: <262949390709170313t649a40d2n5b0598a8bcc034a7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <46EE4CC8.4000906@tomjudge.com> References: <46E11515.8090007@tomjudge.com> <46E174DB.8070004@FreeBSD.org> <20070907185757.GA25624@kobe.laptop> <262949390709091803s507265e6mf3929c4dd26ecc56@mail.gmail.com> <20070910110528.GB2476@kobe.laptop> <20070910115636.GA8326@kobe.laptop> <46EE4CC8.4000906@tomjudge.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9/17/07, Tom Judge <tom@tomjudge.com> wrote: > Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > On 2007-09-10 14:05, Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> On 2007-09-10 02:03, Nuno Antunes <nuno.antunes@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> Tom Judge wrote: > >>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>> While making some changes to the routing table on one of our routers > >>>>>> today I noticed that "route add" was showing some strange > >>>>>> behaviour. When adding a route for 128/8 to the table rather than > >>>>>> adding 128.0.0.0/8 it would add 0.0.0.0/8, however adding 10/9 works > >>>>>> correctly. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Is this a bug in route or the routing table? > >>> Hi, > >>> Can you take a look at this patch, please? > >>> > >>> http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/submit/2007-09/msg00000.html > >> Fantastic, thanks for the pointer! :-) > >> > >> Skimming fast through the diff it seems to be ok. It doesn't apply > >> cleanly over HEAD so some merging was required to get this version > >> instead: BTW, there's also a fix for netstat to print CIDR network addresses correctly: http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/submit/2007-09/msg00005.html Cheers, Nuno
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?262949390709170313t649a40d2n5b0598a8bcc034a7>