From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Oct 29 10:53:19 1995
Return-Path: owner-stable
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id KAA12682
          for stable-outgoing; Sun, 29 Oct 1995 10:53:19 -0800
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA12672
          for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 29 Oct 1995 10:53:16 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA08464; Sun, 29 Oct 1995 10:52:45 -0800
To: "Andrew V. Stesin" <stesin@elvisti.kiev.ua>
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 2.1.0-951026-SNAP still fails on 4meg system 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 29 Oct 1995 17:22:04 +0200."
             <199510291522.RAA14695@office.elvisti.kiev.ua> 
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 1995 10:52:45 -0800
Message-ID: <8462.814992765@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> 	please wouldn't you personally and FreeBSD team mind considering
> 	a two-floppy install option, too -- at least, for future?

There are various ways of solving this problem, Andrey, and you may
rest assured that various people will be looking into all of them.  As
I told everyone on hackers: I'm not saying that it's wrong to try and
solve this problem, it's just wrong to try and do so at the last
minute every time.  Our margins are exhausted and the solution isn't
to keep pecking it down just under the limit - we've proven that
doesn't work, were it not already obviously a flawed strategy! :)

As for now, you might try it anyway. Apparently, it does install
for some people - we're hovering that much on the knife-edge.

					Jordan