Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 17:27:50 +0200 From: Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@digiware.nl> To: Lee Dilkie <lee@dilkie.com>, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>, "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@yandex-team.ru> Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, Luigi Rizzo <luigi@freebsd.org>, "Andrey V. Elsukov" <ae@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ipfw <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [CFT] new tables for ipfw Message-ID: <53ECD576.8040801@digiware.nl> In-Reply-To: <53ECAFB9.50507@dilkie.com> References: <53EBC687.9050503@yandex-team.ru> <CA%2BhQ2%2Bg=A_rLHCVpBqn0AtFLu_gNGtzbmXvc-7JhpLqPSWw44A@mail.gmail.com> <53EC880B.3020903@yandex-team.ru> <CA%2BhQ2%2BiPPhy47eN0=KaSYBaNMdObY20yko7dRY1MMuP_mfnmOQ@mail.gmail.com> <53EC960A.1030603@yandex-team.ru> <CA%2BhQ2%2BgxVYmXb%2BHOw4qUm6tykmEvBRkrV0RhZsnC6B08FLKvdA@mail.gmail.com> <53ECA6B2.8010003@digiware.nl> <53ECAFB9.50507@dilkie.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 14-8-2014 14:46, Lee Dilkie wrote: > > On 8/14/2014 08:08, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: >> I've found the notation ipnr:something rather frustrating when using >> ipv6 addresses. Sort of like typing a ipv6 address in a browser, the >> last :xx is always interpreted as portnumber, UNLESS you wrap it in []'s. >> compare >> 2001:4cb8:3:1::1 >> 2001:4cb8:3:1::1:80 >> [2001:4cb8:3:1::1]:80 >> The first and the last are the same host but a different port, the >> middle one is just a different host. >> >> Could/should we do the same in ipfw? > > the first and second forms are valid, but as ipv6 addresses *with no port*, > > The third is an ipv6 address with a port. > > If the intent of the second form is an address and port, it will not be > parsed that way by standard parsers and violates the ivp6 addressing rfc's. I agree, but ipfw does not understand [2001:4cb8:3:1::1] last time I tried. So I think you rephrased what I meant to say. Thanx, --WjW
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53ECD576.8040801>