From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 21:24:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6824B1065674; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:24:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmmtao102.cox.net (eastrmmtao102.cox.net [68.230.240.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC9FE8FC16; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:24:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmimpo01.cox.net ([68.1.16.119]) by eastrmmtao102.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20090111212455.JLYX8735.eastrmmtao102.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net>; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:24:55 -0500 Received: from localhost ([68.103.37.153]) by eastrmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id 2MQs1b00C3JFCbG02MQsS8; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:24:53 -0500 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=9hxJgBN4UzgA:10 a=7sLkkQMOswkA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=lfydo2j0K1x2_BnvR4oA:9 a=oG9jB7JqVAlABJSYb8IA:7 a=Pg9xa_E4aBiTYaZNwveuQACfyYIA:4 a=WKKDnHgqpS8A:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=4vB-4DCPJfMA:10 a=LY0hPdMaydYA:10 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:24:43 -0600 To: "Alexander Churanov" From: "Jeremy Messenger" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3cb459ed0901091434y3ec4cb5cr56bf358b527515d7@mail.gmail.com> <1231602062.44156.28.camel@hood.oook.cz> <3cb459ed0901101407m2c72487aqf35ea2c81761290e@mail.gmail.com> <1231629954.10829.0.camel@hood.oook.cz> <3cb459ed0901111038k6b290194k949e43d96a822092@mail.gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <3cb459ed0901111038k6b290194k949e43d96a822092@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.63 (Linux) Cc: pav@freebsd.org, Simon Barner , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: STILL OPEN: ports/129226: update devel/boost from 1.34.1 to 1.37 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:24:54 -0000 On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:38:10 -0600, Alexander Churanov wrote: > 2009/1/11 Pav Lucistnik > >> >> That's certainly a possibility -- but can two boost versions coexist in >> a single system? >> > That's a real problem. To my mind there are no problems for shared > libraries, but for header files the suggested solution would require > placing > headers under /usr/local/include/boost-134/boost and modify all ports' > build > processes to include /usr/local/include/boost-134 in a search path. I rather to put only a version and fix the rest port. With that include/boost-134 hack is going to require hack in every port that depend on it. Cheers, Mezz > I'll carry out this experiment. > Another thing I've heard about port versioning is that Gentoo Linux > handles > different versions of the same port installed on a system. Probably, > it's a > good idea to examine how they do that slotting. > Sincerely, > Alexander Churanov -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org