Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 10 May 2006 14:03:03 +0100
From:      Florent Thoumie <flz@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez <rnsanchez@gmail.com>
Cc:        arch@freebsd.org, Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@freebsd.org>, m m <needacoder@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: Patch for adding /media to FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <1147266183.27229.2.camel@mayday.esat.net>
In-Reply-To: <52b3de6f0605100557u792b74b8i75bf1a01fd868d7@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <1e4841eb0605091838u39a46dfw81cc9f452d9722b6@mail.gmail.com> <1147230589.45319.33.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <1e4841eb0605092016r701e9bb3uc3e02dbd3e0ebf6a@mail.gmail.com> <1147237741.45319.50.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <52b3de6f0605100557u792b74b8i75bf1a01fd868d7@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--=-saymLjU5qlcF3B1g7kML
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 09:57 -0300, Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez wrote:
> On 5/10/06, Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > It's not backwards compatible if system administrators are already usin=
g
> > it as a mount point itself.  In that case we're trying to create mount
> > points within a mounted file system.  Plus, one of the big things
> > adding /media is will help is HAL support on FreeBSD.  If we picked
> > another name, this would mean additional FreeBSD-specific hacks on port=
s
> > that expect removable media mounts to exist under /media.
>=20
> I don't have strong reasons to object against /media, I just think
> that this covers applications' errors assuming /media exists and
> contains removable media mount points.  Or, more specifically, HAL's
> assumption of /media, instead of accepting some configuration
> parameter telling where it should look for removable-media mount
> points.
>=20
> Personally I'd mount removable media under /mnt (as I always did) and
> change HAL to accept configuration like this, specifying where it
> should look for instead of assuming /media.  Perhaps this affects less
> users.

/mnt is meant to be used as a mount point, /media will be a directory
containing mount points.

The main idea behind using /media is to reduce the porting efforts, read
Marcus' posts.

PS: This really is bikeshedding.

--=20
Florent Thoumie
flz@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD Committer

--=-saymLjU5qlcF3B1g7kML
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBEYeSGMxEkbVFH3PQRAiEBAJwL+Rb426D2mg4TwyoXjHlThm+vPACfYYXw
a2WYzlUxQWJLx4dKxBx2m8E=
=aAUz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-saymLjU5qlcF3B1g7kML--




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1147266183.27229.2.camel>