From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Feb 19 0:46:21 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from herring.nlsystems.com (nlsys.demon.co.uk [158.152.125.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA4B115C6 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 1999 00:46:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) Received: from localhost (dfr@localhost) by herring.nlsystems.com (8.9.2/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA67092; Fri, 19 Feb 1999 08:45:46 GMT (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 08:45:46 +0000 (GMT) From: Doug Rabson To: Matthew Jacob Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Panic in FFS/4.0 as of yesterday In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 18 Feb 1999, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > Oh, btw- I should clarify a little about this test and some spice to the > mix... The same test on a system that is 25% of the cpu power and 25% of > the memory running solaris 2.7 Intel not only successfully has always runs > this test but also retains a quite acceptable responsiveness. Please don't > make me claim Slowlaris is better! I'm sure that something very wrong is happening, don't worry. Hopefully, I will be able to see something. -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 442 9037 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message