Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 00:10:06 +0200 (EET) From: Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee> To: "=?iso-8859-1?q?Pedro=20F.=20Giffuni?=" <giffunip@yahoo.com> Cc: Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@online.fr>, <freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: GGI (was: Project Status) Message-ID: <20030205233350.R43637-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee> In-Reply-To: <20030205213021.42357.qmail@web13406.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, [iso-8859-1] Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: > --- Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee> ha scritto: > > ... > > > > Linux on Desktop has failed? On the contrary, Linux > > on Desktop has never > > been doing better and is in a major upswing. > > > It has never been better cause it has never been > there. > You really don't like homework, do you? ;) > You assume things that aren't true. > http://kt.zork.net/kernel-traffic/latest.html#1 He is basicly ... just totally wrong in most areas and in the ones he isn't he doesn't realise that these don't actually pertain to a Linux desktop. For all I know he might well be right on the PDAs, but on desktop he is just plain wrong. In fact, looking into the very issue of 'linux on desktop' on kernel traffic is stupid. The overlap between people who have a clue about linux kernel and linux desktop is very small. Oh - and I actually work for a company that does unix on desktop & is going to release a linux desktop. > > cheers, > > Pedro. > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030205233350.R43637-100000>