Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 28 Jul 2002 09:20:35 -0700
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
To:        ticso@cicely.de
Cc:        cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk bsd.cpu.mk
Message-ID:  <20020728162035.GA86944@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020728141424.GH97768@cicely5.cicely.de>
References:  <200207272204.g6RM46Ji040820@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020727221313.C48442A7D6@canning.wemm.org> <20020728033812.GA86714@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020728141424.GH97768@cicely5.cicely.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 04:14:25PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
> > EV56 please.  Maybe even EV6.
> 
> ev56 will break compatibility with many supported older machines.
> What happens with releases and packages?

You weren't paying attention to the originial commit. :-)

----------------------------
revision 1.13
date: 2002-07-27 22:04:05;  author: jhb;  state: Exp;  lines: +14 -6
If there is not a CPUTYPE defined by default, then allow for _CPUCFLAGS
to tune for more advanced processors while still supporting the minimum
processor in an architecture.  We can do this with the '-mtune=' option
to gcc for alpha, sparc64, and powerpc and with the mis-named '-mcpu='
option for i386.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020728162035.GA86944>