Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 09:49:01 +0000 (GMT) From: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> To: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Hand up on Voodoo1 vs. Voodoo2 Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.01.9901190948170.40696-100000@herring.nlsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <19990118154054.A3946@cons.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 18 Jan 1999, Martin Cracauer wrote: > If you have a Voodoo Card, please let me know whether it is Voodoo1, > 2, Rush or whatever. I assume there are many more V1 folks around, but > need proof. Also, nowaday's Xi has OpenGL drivers for other cards, so > Voodoo isn't the only option now. Anyone did try this with Quake? > > I have some time to work on the 3d-related ports, amoung them > emulators/linux_glide. This currently installs a Voodoo1-only shared > library. It doesn't run on a V2 and a V2 lib doesn't run on a > V1. Nice. > > The Voodoo 1 Linux stuff is much nicer anyway, it has everything you > need including header files and some test programs in one nice > .tar.gz, while the newer stuff is rpm and to get the header files you > have to download a 3MB SDK with lots of useless stuff. > > Opinions? I have a Voodoo 2 card sitting idle in my work machine waiting for a FreeBSD port of Glide... -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 442 9037 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-multimedia" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.01.9901190948170.40696-100000>