Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 11 May 2015 15:40:49 -0400
From:      Ernie Luzar <luzar722@gmail.com>
To:        Jon Radel <jon@radel.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: c_rehash pgm missing from 10.1
Message-ID:  <555105C1.50401@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5550FCBE.1020909@radel.com>
References:  <554E3771.5060709@gmail.com> <20150509180516.3471c1ae@curlew.lan> <554E4119.9010206@gmail.com> <5550FCBE.1020909@radel.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
Jon Radel wrote:
> On 5/9/15 1:17 PM, Ernie Luzar wrote:
>>        The real question is why is it not included in the base system?
>>
> Things might get better if you install source; I swear we discussed 
> that in one of the gazillion threads you've kicked off.  Or more 
> precisely, the fact that CA.pl is installed in /usr/src along with 
> other openssl utilities that come along with the base version of openssl.
>
> --Jon Radel
> jon@radel.com
>
Well I do install a fresh operating system from a .iso file every time a 
new RELEASE is published . Its my understanding that the RELEASE build 
is from a system maintained from source. So there is no reason for a 
.iso installed OS to be any different from  a OS installed from source.  
If there is a difference then the RELEASE build method has a big 
problem.  Also missing is c_client and the CA.pl & CA.sh scripts from a 
base op install from a .iso cdrom.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?555105C1.50401>