Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:28:30 -0800 From: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> To: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [Call for Testers] ACPI-CA 20071114 Message-ID: <20071116232830.GB7943@bunrab.catwhisker.org> In-Reply-To: <200711161823.17730.jkim@FreeBSD.org> References: <200711161338.54270.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <200711161626.46834.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <20071116230910.GZ7943@bunrab.catwhisker.org> <200711161823.17730.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--/Z3Qj54wC++taHdq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 06:23:14PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > ... > > FWIW, I'm pretty sure this is the same (fairly broken) behavior as > > I see now. > > > > The machine is a Dell Inspiron 8200. >=20 > You mean it did not improve nor regress anything, right? Correct: no leakage of "magic smoke;" no behavioral change that I see. I didn't even get the LOR (though if that was specific to the IBM ACPI stuff, it would make a certain amount of sense that I wouldn'tsee it.) Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Proprietary data formats obfuscate, rather than disseminate, information. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --/Z3Qj54wC++taHdq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkc+J50ACgkQmprOCmdXAD0yLwCeKzWCrKMKFrLpBUJ9gNsIzF6u aCwAnioobQe//JvkD3kF227VMwCZz7YG =/JVR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/Z3Qj54wC++taHdq--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071116232830.GB7943>