Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 8 Jun 2004 12:36:47 -0400
From:      Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>
To:        Peter Risdon <peter@circlesquared.com>
Cc:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   [OT] What's "QED"? (was Re: Wisdom of automating upgrades)
Message-ID:  <20040608123647.2cab2e91.wmoran@potentialtech.com>
In-Reply-To: <40C5E758.5050406@circlesquared.com>
References:  <40C5BCAC.6090401@circlesquared.com> <20040608144433.D31793@unsane.co.uk> <40C5DBD1.5010607@circlesquared.com> <16581.57971.324955.793717@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <40C5E758.5050406@circlesquared.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Risdon <peter@circlesquared.com> wrote:

> Robert Huff wrote:
> 
> >Peter Risdon writes:
> >
> >> I suppose what I'm driving at is whether the RELENG_4 branch sees
> >> many commits that are likely to be problematic.
> >>    
> >	In general, no.
> >	On the other hand ... think of this as a Murphy's Law scenario:
> >if you automate, it _will_ break horribly two days before some
> >absolutely critical deadline.
> >  
> 
> QED

I must be "out of touch" with my jargon ...

What's "QED"?

-- 
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040608123647.2cab2e91.wmoran>