Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 29 May 2008 16:53:19 +0200
From:      Michael Reifenberger <mike@reifenberger.com>
To:        Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/jexec jexec.8 jexec.c
Message-ID:  <20080529145319.GC94385@gw.reifenberger.com>
In-Reply-To: <20080529151233.I3678@fledge.watson.org>
References:  <200805261157.m4QBvnpF025029@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080526144831.K26343@fledge.watson.org> <20080526140735.GA35960@gw.reifenberger.com> <200805281309.49683.jhb@freebsd.org> <20080529140557.GA94385@gw.reifenberger.com> <20080529151233.I3678@fledge.watson.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 03:14:20PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
...
> The other concept that might be of benefit is a "dead" jail vs. a "live" 
> jail -- with TCP connections taking a while to run down, there can often be 
> dangling jail references that don't garbage collect for a few minutes. 
> Perhaps, where there is ambiguity, live jails (ones with referencing 
> processes) should be preferred to dead ones.

Thats something that the admin should take care for.

-- 
Bye/2
---
Michael Reifenberger
Michael@Reifenberger.com
http://www.Reifenberger.com




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080529145319.GC94385>