Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 20 Aug 1999 15:29:45 +0200
From:      Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>
To:        Cillian Sharkey <cillian@baker.ie>
Cc:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Change to /sys/net/if.c & /sys/dev/syscons/syscons.c 
Message-ID:  <25881.935155785@axl.noc.iafrica.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 20 Aug 1999 15:09:59 %2B0100." <37BD61B7.F4C2CD28@baker.ie> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Fri, 20 Aug 1999 15:09:59 +0100, Cillian Sharkey wrote:

> +               log(LOG_INFO, "%s%d: promiscuous mode disabled\n",
> +                   ifp->if_name, ifp->if_unit);

You're the second person other than me to request this. :-)

So are there any _objections_ to having the kernel match promiscuous
"enabled" messages with "disabled" counterparts?

Ciao,
Sheldon.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?25881.935155785>