From owner-freebsd-current Thu Feb 11 07:45:41 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA04555 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 11 Feb 1999 07:45:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from solaris.matti.ee (solaris.matti.ee [194.126.98.135]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA04539 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 1999 07:45:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from vallo@myhakas.matti.ee) Received: from myhakas.matti.ee (myhakas.matti.ee [194.126.114.87]) by solaris.matti.ee (8.8.8/8.8.8.s) with ESMTP id RAA28898; Thu, 11 Feb 1999 17:45:30 +0200 (EET) Received: (from vallo@localhost) by myhakas.matti.ee (8.9.2/8.9.1) id RAA46436; Thu, 11 Feb 1999 17:45:32 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from vallo) Message-ID: <19990211174532.A46364@matti.ee> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 17:45:32 +0200 From: Vallo Kallaste To: Mikhail Teterin Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: umount -f Reply-To: vallo@matti.ee References: <19990211144449.A45575@matti.ee> <199902111324.IAA25866@kot.ne.mediaone.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: <199902111324.IAA25866@kot.ne.mediaone.net>; from Mikhail Teterin on Thu, Feb 11, 1999 at 08:24:52AM -0500 Organization: =?iso-8859-15?Q?AS_Matti_B=FCrootehnika?= Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Feb 11, 1999 at 08:24:52AM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > =Do you have "hard" mount or "soft" mount? I have seen such behavior > =for "hard" mounts. > > Soft. But it should not matter, should it? I don't know, I'm not a expert to say for sure. Only know that about two months ago I tried to soft mount some exports from our Solaris 2.5.1 box and after that I was able to forcibly umount them. That's all I can say, I haven't used any NFS mounts since. -- Vallo Kallaste vallo@matti.ee To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message