Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 02:16:29 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: reg@shale.csir.co.za Cc: hasty@rah.star-gate.com, jkh@zippy.cdrom.com, imp@village.org, peter@netplex.com.au, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/linux-devel - Imported sources Message-ID: <199907120916.CAA68449@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <19990712005914.A61574@shale.csir.co.za> (message from Jeremy Lea on Mon, 12 Jul 1999 00:59:14 %2B0200) References: <13439.931564878@zippy.cdrom.com> <199907100120.SAA05444@rah.star-gate.com> <19990712005914.A61574@shale.csir.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: Jeremy Lea <reg@shale.csir.co.za> * I don't want to question anyone's capabilites, but there have been many * new committers added who I've never heard of before, and I read way too * much FreeBSD mail... Up till a few months ago you really had to earn * your stripes, by either submitting stuff to maintainers or through * send-pr, and in that process you learnt the CVS tree rules, the Ports * tree rules, and how to behave on the mailing lists. Now it seems that * you only need to raise your hand. I know it's over used, but while * "many hands make light work", "too many cooks spoil the broth". Actually, this is still a rule for the ports committers (since that's exactly the criteria I use when judging new ports committers proposals). As I said before, the current case (Marcel) sort of slipped through since he wasn't proposed as a ports committer. -PW To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907120916.CAA68449>