From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 25 18:18:31 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E63EC38D for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 18:18:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oa0-x22f.google.com (mail-oa0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACAE02D8B for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 18:18:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id k1so4791828oag.34 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 10:18:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=6iI09ssepuyL7KNKZcPVnh5VLoQTgjIWsLghcDdCMeM=; b=KYFsTFN+WlR9RIc0JdrEjkwZaY1v/eOie65GJOPIVZ5EbUa+5G6ZminkUie0EbhpFd V9LCNuWRZ11TFL7jgaduheRMrRWuTVnxh2d38M2jD382kk5BXSw3lAAy+MtEKWMZyk0A oZpvHIg1ok9z6GGfMKmNLcQyOdbBSY26qH5NSDvD0CuPG+5uF7XGmUDF3x+FWFczLNry s8yvFqiLBTGaCDvRfvydNhAId1qnPw4MtUScr4i8aylORmgWKnyBOkbwtnFVAuhSKek9 EI2//Q9DTUVArleKm9vxdCF9kEYf8gp5Eam+XbFKdM+y5nvDARGgClHJS3yv5CwMXmQ0 ztog== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.93.67 with SMTP id cs3mr26037297oeb.12.1385403510984; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 10:18:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.132.9 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 10:18:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <2103733116.16923158.1384866769683.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca> <9F76D61C-EFEB-44B3-9717-D0795789832D@gmail.com> <5969250F-0987-4304-BB95-52C7BAE8D84D@gmail.com> <18391B9C-2FC4-427B-A4B6-1739B3C17498@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 10:18:30 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Performance difference between UFS and ZFS with NFS From: Freddie Cash To: Eric Browning Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.16 Cc: FreeBSD FS X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 18:18:32 -0000 On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Eric Browning < ericbrowning@skaggscatholiccenter.org> wrote: > I am using /dev/zero > > /usr/bin/time -h dd if=3D/dev/zero of=3Dsometestfile bs=3D1024 count=3D30= 00000 > You really shouldn't use /dev/zero to "benchmark" ZFS. It doesn't work the way you think it will, especially if dedupe or compression are enabled. Either use a proper filesystem benchmarking tool like iozone or bonnie++ or fio; or create a big file using /dev/random and then dd that file to various places in the filesystem.=E2=80=8B=E2=80=8B # =E2=80=8Bdd if=3D/dev/random of=3Dbigfile.100M bs=3D1M count=3D100=E2=80= =8B =E2=80=8BReboot to clear caches. Then use if=3Dbigfile.100M in your actual= testing.=E2=80=8B --=20 Freddie Cash fjwcash@gmail.com