Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 21:01:28 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r400699 - in head/net: p5-ldap2pf p5-ldap2pw p5-srv2pf Message-ID: <868u6eq2cn.fsf@desk.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20151103183818.GB78371@FreeBSD.org> (Alexey Dokuchaev's message of "Tue, 3 Nov 2015 18:38:18 %2B0000") References: <201511031307.tA3D7vYm038599@repo.freebsd.org> <20151103135940.GA16036@FreeBSD.org> <86h9l3otgu.fsf@desk.des.no> <20151103183818.GB78371@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> writes: > I was under impression that this GH vs. GHC distinction is obsolete now, > but I'm not an expert here. If I understand correctly, GH is for tarballs which Github automatically creates when you tag a release, while GHC is for tarballs that you create yourself and then upload. For instance, if your project uses autotools or a parser generator or documentation generator or something similar, you want to include the output in the distribution, but you don't want to check it into the repo. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?868u6eq2cn.fsf>