From owner-freebsd-alpha Fri May 4 19:34: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from femail6.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail6.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.95.86]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B24D837B423 for ; Fri, 4 May 2001 19:34:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from miklic@home.com) Received: from c109118a3 ([24.10.140.87]) by femail6.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id <20010505023407.SQJQ29527.femail6.sdc1.sfba.home.com@c109118a3> for ; Fri, 4 May 2001 19:34:07 -0700 Message-ID: <000801c0d50c$5288ba30$6401a8c0@c109118a3> From: "Andrew M. Miklic" To: Subject: PCI_RF_DENSE Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 19:37:26 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Does anyone know if the PCI_RF_DENSE flag works with allocating system memory resources in -CURRENT? It used to work on 4.0, but when I tried to port my TGA driver to 5.0 on my AlphaStation200, I keep getting NULL returned in the resource's r_virtual field when allocated from the driver's attach() routine...apparently no machine-specific method is being properly initialized for alphapci_cvt_dense(), as the default null_cvt() is always being called (which just returns NULL)--does anyone have any ideas? Is anyone successfully using a pci driver that uses "dense" memory? Thanks, Andrew Miklic To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message