From owner-freebsd-mobile Tue Nov 28 12:47:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from zorch.sf-bay.org (zorch.sf-bay.org [192.150.103.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BB5837B402 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 12:47:51 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by zorch.sf-bay.org (8.11.1/8.8.2) with UUCP id eASKj5608776; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 12:45:05 -0800 (PST) Received: (from scott@localhost) by zorba.sf-bay.org (8.11.1/8.8.8) id eASKgRK53231 for imp@village.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 12:42:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scott) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 12:42:27 -0800 (PST) From: Scott Hazen Mueller Message-Id: <200011282042.eASKgRK53231@zorba.sf-bay.org> Subject: Re: Aviator 2.4 To: imp@village.org, freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG X-Envelope-To: imp@village.org Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >: these working in a FreeBSD-to-FreeBSD configuration? >That's how I tested them. However, they worked out of the box, but >were really bad about losing packets after a while (at random). Heavy >load never did work right (cvs update over nfs, for example). Didn't >use any raycontrol options to make it work beyond ifconfig. I seem to recall that you dropped MTU down on your cards. Did you drop wsize and rsize down on your NFS mounts? I've got 512-byte MTUs on my ethernet here because of a bogus router, and I had to drop wsize and rsize down to 1024 for NFS to work properly. \scott To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message