From owner-freebsd-current Wed Oct 30 12: 0:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AC2737B401 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:00:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.gnf.org (ns1.gnf.org [63.196.132.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0BB743E6E for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:00:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gtetlow@gnf.org) Received: from EXCHCLUSTER01.lj.gnf.org (exch02.lj.gnf.org [172.25.10.20]) by ns1.gnf.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g9UK0qMf071514 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:00:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gtetlow@gnf.org) Received: from roark.gnf.org ([172.25.24.15]) by EXCHCLUSTER01.lj.gnf.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.4905); Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:01:41 -0800 Received: from roark.gnf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by roark.gnf.org (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g9UK0t7j082339; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:00:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gtetlow@gnf.org) Received: (from gtetlow@localhost) by roark.gnf.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id g9UK0tk3082338; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:00:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:00:55 -0800 From: Gordon Tetlow To: Tim Kientzle Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RCng Awkwardness Message-ID: <20021030200055.GA30253@roark.gnf.org> References: <3DC03815.2050003@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aEQgRVFBwimJ3+rv" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3DC03815.2050003@acm.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Oct 2002 20:01:41.0444 (UTC) FILETIME=[29F44040:01C2804F] Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --aEQgRVFBwimJ3+rv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:50:45AM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote: > I find the standard arguments used by RCng quite > awkward. In particular, especially for people who > have worked with SysV-style init scripts, it's > rather surprising that "/etc/rc.d/nfsd stop" does > not actually stop the nfsd process. Likewise, 'start' > doesn't actually start the specified system. As one of the people that supposedly worked on this. I'm heartily in favor of this. I've found this behavior to be quite annoying. I'll see if I can put something together. If you want to help me out and put together the patches, I'd be more than happy to commit them. -gordon --aEQgRVFBwimJ3+rv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9wDp3Ru2t9DV9ZfsRAkQCAJ9oytrH0Gi7HGZR+34KWuTlsaMXnACfTkm2 e0mwLvQ+OUUMPCJEO4Jrhpc= =xRnN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --aEQgRVFBwimJ3+rv-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message