Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 06:26:27 -0900 From: Mel <fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Steve Franks <bahamasfranks@gmail.com>, matt donovan <kitchetech@gmail.com>, Eitan Adler <eitanadlerlist@gmail.com> Subject: Re: unhappy XOrg upgrade ate the linux version of libuuid.so.1 Message-ID: <200903030626.28527.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: <539c60b90903022121o152a8512s43083525f4033c17@mail.gmail.com> References: <539c60b90903021610j53138295jfa0d11b8caff30fa@mail.gmail.com> <28283d910903021943j511daba3n8b6f4cb4b4a2d74e@mail.gmail.com> <539c60b90903022121o152a8512s43083525f4033c17@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 02 March 2009 20:21:21 Steve Franks wrote:
> > There has always been a /usr/ports/UPDATING atleast as far back as 6.0 is
> > when I noticed itbut that's when I started using FreeBSD
>
> Well, I'll be d###'ed. So there is. Makes sense, I guess. Wonder
> how many other "UPDATING"'s are floating around the system...
There's even a pkg_updating(1), allthough it's matching is flakey at times.
--
Mel
Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules
and never get to the software part.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200903030626.28527.fbsd.questions>