From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 15 23:25:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AFEC1065678; Thu, 15 May 2008 23:25:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@tao.org.uk) Received: from mailhost.tao.org.uk (tao.uscs.susx.ac.uk [139.184.131.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3748FC1C; Thu, 15 May 2008 23:25:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@tao.org.uk) Received: from genius (wireless59.dhcp.tao.org.uk [82.153.225.59]) (Authenticated sender: joemail@transwarp.tao.org.uk) by mailhost.tao.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CB2C81C6; Fri, 16 May 2008 00:25:26 +0100 (BST) From: "Dr Josef Karthauser" To: "'Tony Finch'" References: <20080511102730.DBD0A600F@mailhost.tao.org.uk> In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 00:25:26 +0100 Organization: Tao Research Message-ID: <07f101c8b6e2$f4b13f20$de13bd60$@org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Aci0T1To4GbZ6Q7dTnmaAknGu4EvVACk5EyQ Content-Language: en-gb Cc: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: cvsup.uk.FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: joe@tao.org.uk List-Id: "FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 23:25:29 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > hubs@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Tony Finch > Sent: 12 May 2008 17:06 > To: Dr Joe Karthauser > Cc: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: cvsup.uk.FreeBSD.org > > On Sun, 11 May 2008, Dr Joe Karthauser wrote: > > > > I have reclassified this faulty mirror as cvsup1 and made cvsup a > cname to > > cvsup3, which is the most recent addition and best hardware > available. In > > the future we will always point to the most available machine in this > way. > > Looks like I'm getting a bit more traffic than before - peaking at over > 100 logins an hour. As a matter of interest, do you know what the peak bandwidth usage is? Joe